Bracketing Estimation of Intentional Polysubstance Use in the United States

Evidence from diverse sources suggests that persons who have a substance use disorder (SUD) often have problems with one or more additional substances, a situation broadly, if imprecisely, termed polysubstance use or more preferably multiple substance use disorder (mSUD). Because of the heavy toll of maladaptive neuronal dysregulation, morbidity, and mortality of SUDs, and increasingly of mSUD, on the individual, their families, the healthcare system, insurers, regulators, and society at large, it seems of value to have an estimate of the prevalence of mSUD. This turns out to be surprisingly difficult, due to nebulous or disparate definitions and to weaknesses in data acquisition methodology. We here attempt a pragmatic way of bracketing an estimate of mSUD prevalence in the US. We conclude that a reasonable estimated range of mSUD in the US is about 8 to 14 million persons. This approach provides a quick estimate for stakeholders involved in efforts to understand or deal with the immediate crisis of mSUD, as more refined estimations are pursued.

A New Rat Study Suggests There May Be a Biologic Explanation for Higher Fentanyl Mortality in Men Than in Women

Could it be possible that we should give some weight to the contribution of biological differences as contributors to the greater fentanyl mortality in males than in females? Most current explanations for a sex difference are based largely on psychosocial and other non-physiologic contributions. Our recent findings suggest a biological contribution. This could have broad implications for the interpretation and prevention of fentanyl overdose deaths.

A Novel Agnostic Respiratory Stimulant as a Treatment for Apnea of Prematurity: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Aim/Objective: ENA-001 is a novel selective antagonist of large-conductance BK (big potassium) channels located in the carotid bodies, where they act as chemoreceptors that sense low arterial oxygen levels and establish a feedback loop to brainstem nuclei responsible for initiating spontaneous breathing and maintaining adequate oxygen to tissues. ENA-001 attenuates respiratory depression induced by a variety of chemical agents, essentially "agnostic" to the precipitating drug (e.g., opioid(s), benzodiazepine, alcohol, or propofol). But it had not been tested against respiratory depression resulting from a physiological cause, such as apnea of prematurity (AOP). This proof-of-principle study used a well-described animal model (premature lamb) to test the effectiveness of ENA-001 in the setting of an under-developed respiratory control system, similar to that in human AOP.

Materials and Methods: A set of twin lambs was delivered prematurely via caesarian section at 135 ± 2 d gestational age (GA). An arterial catheter was connected to a transducer for pressure monitoring and a venous catheter was connected to a pump for continuous infusion of 5% dextrose in water (D5W). Lambs were to receive four mechanical breaths for lung recruitment and then started on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). After a stabilization period of 15 minutes, the protocol called for the first lamb to be started on continuous infusion of ENA-001, with ascending dose hourly (0.4, 1.1, 2.0, 12.0 mg/kg/hr), while the second lamb was to serve as a sham (D5W) control. At least 10 representative breaths free of artifact from motion or atypical breaths were recorded using a pulmonary function system designed for neonatal research. To maintain a stable plane of anesthesia, repeat doses of fentanyl (1 µg IM) were given as needed based on blood pressure response to stimulation.

Results: Two male lambs were delivered. Unexpectedly, neither lamb exhibited a drive for spontaneous breathing. Each required manual ventilation, with a complete absence of spontaneous effort. Despite the poor prognosis owing to the absence of ventilatory effort, continuous infusion of the first dose of ENA-001 was started 20 minutes after birth. The test animal continued to require manual ventilation, which was continued for an additional 10 minutes. An intravenous (IV) bolus of ENA-001 was given. Nearly instantaneously following the delivery of the IV bolus, the lamb began breathing spontaneously and did not require manual intervention for the remainder of the study. The sham animal was delivered approximately an hour following the test animal. As with the test animal, the sham animal lacked spontaneous breathing efforts. A decision was made to manually ventilate for 30 minutes to match the course for the test animal. At the 30-minute time point, an IV bolus infusion of ENA-001 was delivered. Nearly instantaneously following the delivery of the IV bolus, the lamb began breathing spontaneously. After several minutes, the spontaneous breathing efforts abated, and manual ventilation was resumed. The animal was then sacrificed for tissue harvest.

Conclusion: These results suggest that ENA-001 might be an effective therapy, alone or as a co-medication, for the treatment of AOP. They further suggest that ENA-001 might have broader applications in situations of neurological ventilatory insufficiency. 

Potential neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a narrative review

Neurological manifestations are increasingly reported in a subset of COVID-19 patients. Previous infections related to coronaviruses, namely Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) also appeared to have neurological effects on some patients. The viruses associated with COVID-19 like that of SARS enters the body via the ACE-2 receptors in the central nervous system, which causes the body to balance an immune response against potential damage to nonrenewable cells. A few rare cases of neurological sequelae of SARS and MERS have been reported. A growing body of evidence is accumulating that COVID-19, particularly in severe cases, may have neurological consequences although respiratory symptoms nearly always develop prior to neurological ones. Patients with preexisting neurological conditions may be at elevated risk for COVID-19-associated neurological symptoms. Neurological reports in COVID-19 patients have described encephalopathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myopathy, neuromuscular disorders, encephalitis, cephalgia, delirium, critical illness polyneuropathy, and others. Treating neurological symptoms can pose clinical challenges as drugs that suppress immune response may be contraindicated in COVID-19 patients. It is possible that in some COVID-19 patients, neurological symptoms are being overlooked or misinterpreted. To date, neurological manifestations of COVID-19 have been described largely within the disease trajectory and the long-term effects of such manifestations remain unknown.

The epidemiology of apnoea of prematurity

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Many premature infants less than 37 weeks gestational age (GA), and almost all infants less than 28 weeks GA, will experience apnoea of prematurity (AOP)-a cessation of respiration for 20 or more seconds (or less than 20 s if accompanied by other signs). Because the treatment options for AOP are so limited, we explore its epidemiology, with the ultimate hope of learning how to decrease its incidence.

COMMENT

Although AOP usually resolves with maturation of the respiratory system, many short- and long-term negative effects are correlated statistically with AOP (although direct causality has not been established). The primary risk factor for AOP is preterm birth, but delivery technique, genetics, socioeconomic status, racial disparities and other influences are suspected to be involved. Anaemia, asthma and gastric reflux have also been associated with preterm birth, but the relationship with AOP is unclear. The postulated associations and the strength of the evidence are briefly reviewed and discussed.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Attempts to elucidate the epidemiology of apnoea of prematurity have been challenging. Studies of AOP are hampered in part by challenges in monitoring the condition, the interplay of multiple comorbidities in preterm neonates and lack of expert consensus definitions. However, since the primary risk factor is preterm birth, efforts to decrease the prevalence of preterm birth would have a positive secondary effect on the prevalence of AOP. Until then, better pharmacotherapeutic options are needed.

The limited management options for apnoea of prematurity

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

About 10% of all infants are born prematurely. Almost all of those of gestational age less than about 30 weeks, and about half of those of gestational age up to about 35 weeks, are subject to unpredictable interruptions of breathing-known as "apnoea of prematurity" (AOP). We present a synopsis of the problem and point out the limited management options.

COMMENT

A basal rate for spontaneous breathing is normally maintained by integrated action of generator cells in the brainstem and feedback from central and peripheral chemosensors. In AOP, there are intermittent periods (seconds) lacking spontaneous firing, which results in hypoxia and hypercapnia. The long-term consequences of these interruptions in oxygen supply to tissues are not known. Although many treatment modalities are used, including drug therapy, nonpharmacologic care and mechanical intervention, there is no universally effective first-line management for AOP. Caffeine citrate is generally the most frequently used pharmacotherapeutic agent, but its side effect profile narrows with higher doses and the upper limit is still being investigated to discern the greatest benefit-to-risk ratio; thus, most infants do not achieve complete resolution of apnoeas.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Given the widespread and serious nature of the problem of AOP, there is a surprising lack of treatment options. A more consistent and effective treatment, alone or as adjunct, would be welcome.

Pharmacologic agents directed at the treatment of pain associated with maladaptive neuronal plasticity

INTRODUCTION

The definition of nociplastic pain in 2016 has changed the way maladaptive chronic pain is viewed in that it may emerge without neural lesions or neural disease. Many endogenous and pharmacologic substances are being investigated for their role in treating the pain associated with neuronal plasticity.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review promising pharmacologic agents for the treatment of pain associated with maladaptive neuronal plasticity. The authors then provide the reader with their expert opinion and provide their perspectives for the future.

EXPERT OPINION

An imbalance between the amplification of ascending pain signals and the poor activation of descending inhibitory signals may be at the root of many chronic pain syndromes. The inhibitory activity of noradrenaline reuptake may play a role in neuropathic and nociplastic analgesia. A better understanding of the brain's pain matrix, its signaling cascades, and the complex bidirectional communication between the immune system and the nervous system may help meet the urgent and unmet medical need for safe, effective chronic pain treatment, particularly for pain with a neuropathic and/or nociplastic component.

Wooden Chest syndrome: The atypical pharmacology of fentanyl overdose

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

A large percentage of opioid overdose fatalities involve fentanyl or one of its legal or illegal analogs (F/FAs). Is there something about the pharmacology of these drugs that make them unusually dangerous in an overdose?

COMMENT

Some of the reasons for the dangers of overdose of F/FAs is their high potency and low cost (that leads to wide distribution). But it is rarely asked if the basic pharmacology of F/FAs differ in some fundamental way from conventional opioids such as morphine and heroin. In addition to centrally mediated respiratory depression via opioid receptors, F/FAs cause rigidity in the key respiratory muscles of the chest, upper airway and diaphragm ("wooden chest syndrome," WCS) by a non-opioid mechanism.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

WCS is an atypical pharmacology of F/FAs. Because of its rapid onset and non-opioid mechanism, WCS makes F/FA overdose particularly dangerous.

Overdoses due to fentanyl and its analogues (F/FAs) push naloxone to the limit

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMs) encourage emergency responders, paramedics, law enforcement agents, and even laypeople to be trained in the administration of naloxone with the intent of rescuing individuals from a known or suspected opioid overdose.

COMMENT

Although naloxone is generally safe and effective at reversing respiratory depression caused by a conventional opioid such as morphine or heroin by competing with the opioid and displacing it from the μ-opioid receptor, questions increasingly are arising as to whether naloxone can adequately reverse opioid overdoses that may involve the potent opioids fentanyl and its analogues (F/FAs). In other words, as more and more opioid overdoses involve F/FAs, can naloxone keep up?

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

As a competitive antagonist at μ-opioid receptors, naloxone is often a life-saving agent in cases of overdose caused by conventional opioids, but it may not be versatile or powerful enough to combat the rising tide of overdoses due to fentanyl and its illicit analogues, or in cases of overdose involving combinations of opioids and non-opioids.

Benefit-Risk Analysis of Buprenorphine for Pain Management

Health care providers in the United States are facing challenges in selecting appropriate medication for patients with acute and chronic pain in the midst of the current opioid crisis and COVID-19 pandemic. When compared with conventional opioids, the partial µ-opioid receptor agonist buprenorphine has unique pharmacologic properties that may be more desirable for pain management. The formulations of buprenorphine approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for pain management include intravenous injection, transdermal patch, and buccal film. A comparison of efficacy and safety data from studies of buprenorphine and conventional opioids suggests that buprenorphine may be a better-tolerated treatment option for many patients that provides similar or superior analgesia. Our benefit-risk assessment in this narrative review suggests that health care providers should consider that buprenorphine may be an appropriate alternative for pain management over other opioids.

Are opioid receptor antagonists adequate for "Opioid" overdose in a changing reality?

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Deaths due to opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) continue to rise despite intense regulatory and professional actions. COVID-19 has only worsened this situation.¹ An opioid receptor antagonist (ORA) such as naloxone is the most common intervention for OIRD. However, with increasing overdose from highly potent illicit opioids and polysubstance abuse, appraisal of the adequacy of ORA seems warranted and timely.

COMMENT

OIRD results from the binding of an excess number of agonist molecules to opioid receptors. Mechanistically, it makes sense to reverse this by displacing agonist molecules by administering an ORA. But realistically, the trend to higher-potency agonists and polysubstance abuse diminishes the effectiveness of this approach. We are left facing a crisis without a solution.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

For the increasingly common OIRD from highly potent illicit agonists and polysubstance overdose, ORAs are correspondingly less effective. Alternatives are needed-soon.

History of Respiratory Stimulants

The interest in substances that stimulate respiration has waxed and waned throughout the years, intensifying following the introduction of a new class of drugs that causes respiratory depression, and diminishing when antidotes or better drug alternatives are found. Examples include the opioids--deaths increasing during overprescribing, diminishing with wider availability of the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, increasing again during COVID-19; the barbiturates--until largely supplanted by the benzodiazepines; propofol; and other central nervous system depressants. Unfortunately, two new troubling phenomena force a reconsideration of the status-quo: (1) overdoses due to highly potent opioids such as fentanyl, and even more-potent licit and illicit fentanyl analogs, and (2) overdose due to polysubstance use (the combination of an opioid plus one or more non-opioid drug, such as a benzodiazepine, sedating antidepressant, skeletal muscle relaxant, or various other agents). Since these now represent the majority of cases, new solutions are again needed. An interest in respiratory stimulants has been revived. This interest can be informed by a short review of the history of this interesting class of medications. We present a short history of the trajectory of advances toward more selective and safer respiratory stimulants.

Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion

Objective

An expert panel convened to reach a consensus on common misconceptions surrounding buprenorphine, a Schedule III partial µ-opioid receptor agonist indicated for chronic pain. The panel also provided clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of buprenorphine and conversion strategies for switching to buprenorphine from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist for chronic pain management.

Methods

The consensus panel met on March 25, 2019, to discuss relevant literature and provide recommendations on interpreting buprenorphine as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist, prescribing buprenorphine before some Schedule II, III, or IV options, perioperative/trauma management of patients taking buprenorphine, and converting patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine.

Results

The panel recommended that buprenorphine’s classification as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist not be clinically translated to mean partial analgesic efficacy. The panel also recommended that buprenorphine be considered before some Schedule II, III, or IV opioids in patients with a favorable risk/benefit profile on the basis of metabolic factors, abuse potential, and tolerability and that buprenorphine be continued during the perioperative/trauma period. In addition, switching patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine should be considered with no weaning period at starting doses that are based on the previous opioid dose.

Conclusions

These recommendations provide a framework for clinicians to address most clinical scenarios regarding buprenorphine use. The overall consensus of the panel was that buprenorphine is a unique Schedule III opioid with favorable pharmacologic properties and a safety profile that may be desirable for chronic pain management.

Neuronal Effects of Listening to Entrainment Music Versus Preferred Music in Patients With Chronic Cancer Pain as Measured via EEG and LORETA Imaging

Previous studies examining EEG and LORETA in patients with chronic pain discovered an overactivation of high theta (6–9 Hz) and low beta (12–16 Hz) power in central regions. MEG studies with healthy subjects correlating evoked nociception ratings and source localization described delta and gamma changes according to two music interventions. Using similar music conditions with chronic pain patients, we examined EEG in response to two different music interventions for pain. To study this process in-depth we conducted a mixed-methods case study approach, based on three clinical cases. Effectiveness of personalized music therapy improvisations (entrainment music – EM) versus preferred music on chronic pain was examined with 16 participants. Three patients were randomly selected for follow-up EEG sessions three months post-intervention, where they listened to recordings of the music from the interventions provided during the research. To test the difference of EM versus preferred music, recordings were presented in a block design: silence, their own composed EM (depicting both “pain” and “healing”), preferred (commercially available) music, and a non-participant’s EM as a control. Participants rated their pain before and after the EEG on a 1–10 scale. We conducted a detailed single case analysis to compare all conditions, as well as a group comparison of entrainment-healing condition versus preferred music condition. Power spectrum and according LORETA distributions focused on expected changes in delta, theta, beta, and gamma frequencies, particularly in sensory-motor and central regions. Intentional moment-by-moment attention on the sounds/music rather than on pain and decreased awareness of pain was experienced from one participant. Corresponding EEG analysis showed accompanying power changes in sensory-motor regions and LORETA projection pointed to insula-related changes during entrainment-pain music. LORETA also indicated involvement of visual-spatial, motor, and language/music improvisation processing in response to his personalized EM which may reflect active recollection of creating the EM. Group-wide analysis showed common brain responses to personalized entrainment-healing music in theta and low beta range in right pre- and post-central gyrus. We observed somatosensory changes consistent with processing pain during entrainment-healing music that were not seen during preferred music. These results may depict top–down neural processes associated with active coping for pain.

The problem of postoperative respiratory depression

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Postsurgical recovery is influenced by multiple pre-, intra- and perioperative pharmacotherapeutic interventions, including the administration of medications that can induce respiratory depression postoperatively. We present a succinct overview of the topic, including the nature and magnitude of the problem, contributing factors, current limited options, and potential novel therapeutic approach.

COMMENT

Pre-, intra- and perioperative medications are commonly administered for anxiety, anaesthesia, muscle relaxation and pain relief among other reasons. Several of the medications alone or in joint-action can be additive or synergistic producing respiratory depression. Given the large number of surgical procedures that are performed each year, even a small percentage of postoperative respiratory complications translates into a large number of affected patients.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Due to the large number of surgeries performed each year, and the variety of medications used before, during, and after surgery, the occurrence of postoperative respiratory depression is surprisingly common. It is a significant medical problem and burden on hospital resources. There is a need for new strategies to prevent and treat the acute and collateral problems associated with postoperative respiratory depression.

The conundrum of polysubstance overdose

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Treating an opioid overdose using an opioid receptor antagonist (such as naloxone) makes mechanistic sense and can be effective. Unfortunately, the majority of current drug overdose deaths involve polysubstance use (i.e., an opioid plus a non-opioid).

COMMENT

Respiratory depression induced by opioids results from excessive opioid molecules binding to opioid receptors. This effect can be reversed by an opioid receptor antagonist. However, the respiratory depression induced by non-opioid drugs is not due to action at opioid receptors; thus, an opioid receptor antagonist is ineffective in many of these cases. For respiratory depression induced by non-opioids, receptor antagonists are either not available (e.g., for propofol overdose) or there may be attendant risks with their use (e.g., seizures with flumazenil). This gives rise to a need for more effective ways to treat polysubstance overdose.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

A new approach to treating opioid-induced respiratory depression due to drug overdose focuses on agents that stimulate respiratory drive rather than competing for opioid receptors. Such an approach is "agnostic" to the cause of the respiratory depression, so might be a potential way to treat polysubstance overdose.

Benzodiazepines: Thinking outside the black box

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a Drug Safety Communication requiring Boxed Warning updating and other changes in order to improve the safe use of the benzodiazepine drug class. These changes were prompted because 'The current prescribing information for benzodiazepines does not provide adequate warnings about [the] serious risks and harms associated with these medicines so they may be prescribed and used inappropriately'.

COMMENT

The FDA Communication points out that benzodiazepines can be an important option for treating disorders for which these drugs are indicated. However, the acknowledged problems of these drugs, which historically were considered an acceptable trade-off against their benefits, need to be reassessed in light of their widespread (over?) prescribing (for example, in 2019 an estimated 92 million benzodiazepine prescriptions were dispensed from US retail and mail-order pharmacies).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The FDA Communication can be viewed as an important step in reminding healthcare providers of the 'serious risks and harms associated with these medicines', and validation of such reports by patients. Importantly, the FDA Communication includes an often-neglected aspect of benzodiazepine prescribing, namely how to discontinue use, and the perplexing protracted withdrawal syndrome experienced by some patients. The Communication advises to providers: 'No standard benzodiazepine tapering schedule is suitable for all patients; therefore, create a patient-specific plan to gradually reduce the dosage, and ensure ongoing monitoring and support as needed to avoid serious withdrawal symptoms or worsening of the patient's medical condition'.

The Zika virus: Lurking behind the COVID-19 pandemic?

What is known and objective

The sudden and extensive outbreak of coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) has overshadowed another developing viral threat: the Zika flavivirus. Of particular concern is that pregnant women can pass Zika virus to the foetus, and there is a strong implication of an association between Zika virus infection and foetal microcephaly. Currently, there is no vaccine, and there is no cure.

Methods

Published literature and Internet sources were searched for information related to Zika virus, its transmission, its clinical presentation and sequalae, prevention and implications (practice and regulatory) for healthcare providers. The identified English sources were reviewed, assessed and synthesized. Emphasis was placed on providing an overview of the problem, and identification of unmet needs and future directions.

Results and discussion

Zika virus poses a major challenge for healthcare providers, particularly in areas unaccustomed to it, since it is transmitted to humans by the vector Aedes aegypti mosquito. The outbreak impacts every healthcare provider, because every provider is required to report cases of Zika infection to their state or local health agencies––whether the infection is confirmed or merely suspected. Since the virus has become a worldwide crisis, healthcare providers will need to work across national boundaries and medical disciplines in order to educate patients about Zika symptoms and the mosquito vector. Until further information is known, infected patients (male and female) are being advised to avoid conceiving a child.

What is new and Conclusion

Until a vaccine is developed or effective treatment for Zika virus is discovered, healthcare providers must be AVP (aware, vigilant and proactive) in order to lessen the spread and impact of the implicated devastating birth defects (microcephaly) and other neurological disorders (eg Guillain‐Barré Syndrome) of this infection. Unfortunately, many knowledge gaps exist. There is an urgent need for a reliable, inexpensive diagnostic test, an effective treatment and an approved and readily available vaccine.

Until a vaccine is developed or effective treatment for Zika virus is discovered, healthcare providers must be proactive to lessen its spread and impact of implicated birth defects (eg, microcephaly) and other neurological disorders (eg, Guillain‐Barré Syndrome). Unfortunately, knowledge gaps exist. There is urgent need for a reliable, inexpensive diagnostic test, effective treatment and readily available vaccine.

Bone fractures during the time of coronavirus

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

In response to rapid spread of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and lack of vaccine or effective treatment for COVID-19 disease, governments imposed measures that resulted in a shift from work and school to isolation at home. Studies from three countries (China, Belgium and the United States) report the consequences on traumatic bone fractures.

COMMENT

The coronavirus pandemic has resulted in a widespread change to a relative sedentary lifestyle and decreased exposure to light (vitamin D). A consequence of the stay-at-home policies is a negative change in bone-health and environmental surroundings that has led to age-related changes in the number of traumatic bone fractures.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

A consequence of stay-at-home policies has been a decline in bone fractures for young and middle-aged adults; but an increase for the elderly. The trends are predicted to reverse, and present new problems, when isolation restrictions are removed.

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Survey of Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain in Taiwan-Comparison of Pain and Non-Pain Physicians

BACKGROUND

Prescribing opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) has been strictly regulated in Taiwan. This study was undertaken to survey pain and non-pain related physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding prescribing opioids for CNCP.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey was conducted in this comparison study. All 66 physicians who were treating officially registered CNCP outpatients were visited and completed anonymous questionnaires. The other physicians (anesthesiologists, oncologists, and non-pain physicians) were surveyed by a mailed questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 266 (75%) questionnaires were received from 355 board-certified physicians. More CNCP physicians (81.8%) and anesthesiologists (69.7%) had received prior CNCP-related training courses than had oncologists (21.2%) and non-pain physicians (10.3%). Varied proportions of physicians by type were unfamiliar with the Taiwan opioid regulations (16.7-86.8%) and would accordingly skip or reduce dosage of opioid prescriptions (27.3-73.5%). In addition, non-pain physicians had a significantly lower knowledge level, more negative attitudes, and greater hesitation about prescribing opioids compared to the pain-related physicians (P < 0.001). CNCP physicians who had received CNCP-related training courses had a higher knowledge score than did those not receiving training (P = 0.002). Overall, the leading barriers for prescribing opioids were inadequate knowledge of pain management (76%), physician reluctance (73%), and family reluctance (78%).

CONCLUSION

There are substantial knowledge gaps, negative attitudes, and hesitation toward prescribing long-term opioids for CNCP patients by physicians in Taiwan, suggesting that efforts are needed to improve postgraduate education regarding adequate opioid management for CNCP.

Developments in combined analgesic regimens for improved safety in postoperative pain management

Introduction: Fixed-dose combination analgesic regimens may be similarly effective to opioid monotherapy but with potentially less risk. A number of individualized combination regimens can be created, including nonopioid agents such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and adjunctive agents such as gabapentin, pregabalin, and muscle relaxants. Areas covered: When such combinations have a synergistic effect, analgesic benefits may be enhanced. Many combination analgesic regimens are opioid sparing, which sometimes but not always results in reduced opioid-associated side effects. Safety concerns for all analgesics must be considered but postoperative analgesia is typically administered for a brief period (days), reducing risks that may occur with prolonged exposure. Expert opinion: Judiciously considered combination analgesic regimens can be effective postoperative analgesics that reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain control, which are important factors for patient recovery and satisfaction. The specific combinations used must be based on the patient, the type and duration of the surgical procedure, and complementary mechanisms of action of the agents used. In opioid-sparing combination analgesic regimens, the short-term use of small doses of opioids in this setting may be helpful for appropriate patients.

Galcanezumab: a humanized monoclonal antibody for the prevention of migraine and cluster headache

Migraine is a common, painful and highly disabling neurological condition that has plagued mankind for millennia, but its pathophysiology remained largely obscure until recently. The clinical success of triptans for treating migraine and the discovery that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a prominent role in migraine led to increased research interest into this disease. An important improvement has been the development of monoclonal antibodies, including galcanezumab, that bind to CGRP or to its receptor, preventing its activation. Subsequent clinical trials have reported that galcanezumab is safe and well tolerated, and is effective in reducing the frequency of migraine attacks in patients with episodic or chronic migraine. At the same time, increased study of the pathophysiology of cluster headache, a relatively rare condition with excruciatingly painful headache attacks (i.e., "suicide headaches"), led to the discovery that, as in migraine, CGRP plays an important role in its pathology. Clinical trials suggest that galcanezumab is safe and effective for the prevention of episodic cluster headache, and it is under study for chronic cluster headache. Galcanezumab is approved for the prevention of migraine in the U.S., the European Union, Canada and Mexico, and was also approved for the treatment of episodic cluster headache in the U.S.

Opioid withdrawal symptoms, a consequence of chronic opioid use and opioid use disorder: Current understanding and approaches to management

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Opioid use in the United States has reached unprecedented-some would even say crisis-levels. Although many individuals use opioid drugs as part of legitimate pain management plans, a significant number misuse prescription or illicit opioids. With regular opioid use, individuals develop tolerance and physical dependence; both are predictable, physiologic responses to repeated opioid exposure. However, a substantial number of individuals who misuse opioids will develop opioid use disorder (OUD), a complex, primary, chronic, neurobiological disease rooted in genetic, environmental and psychosocial factors. This article discusses OUD, opioid receptor physiology, and opioid withdrawal symptomatology and pathophysiology, as well as current treatment options available to reduce opioid withdrawal symptoms in individuals with physical dependence and/or OUD.

METHODS

The research articles regarding OUD and its management have been reviewed thoroughly based on a PubMed literature search using keywords related to opioid dependence, its pathophysiology and current treatment strategies.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Tolerance/physical dependence and the behavioural characteristics associated with OUD reflect complex neurobiologic adaptations in several major systems of the brain, including the locus ceruleus and mesolimbic systems. Physical dependence is responsible for the distressing withdrawal symptoms individuals experience upon abrupt cessation or rapid dose reduction of exogenous opioids. Opioid withdrawal symptoms are a key driver behind continued opioid use, and a barrier to opioid discontinuation. Several opioid-based medications are available to treat patients with OUD; these treatments can diminish opioid withdrawal symptoms and cravings as well as block opioid effects in the event of relapse. Additionally, non-opioid drugs may be used during acute detoxification to help alleviate opioid withdrawal symptoms.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The opioid crisis has produced many challenges for physicians, one being the need to determine which patients would benefit most from maintenance therapy and which may be candidates for opioid discontinuation. In addition to summarizing current understanding of OUD, we provide a new algorithm for determining the need for continued opioid use as well as examples of situations where management of opioid withdrawal symptoms is indicated.

Safety And Efficacy Of The Unique Opioid Buprenorphine For The Treatment Of Chronic Pain

Background

Chronic pain is associated with decreased quality of life and is one of the most common reasons adults seek medical care, making treatment imperative for many aspects of patient well-being. Chronic pain management typically involves the use of Schedule II full μ-opioid receptor agonists for pain relief; however, the increasing prevalence of opioid addiction is a national crisis that is impacting public health and social and economic welfare. Buprenorphine is a Schedule III partial μ-opioid receptor agonist that is an equally effective but potentially safer treatment option for chronic pain than full μ-opioid receptor agonists. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of the transdermal and buccal formulations of buprenorphine, which are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for chronic pain, compared with that of extended-release full μ-opioid receptor agonists.

Methods

Controlled or randomized controlled clinical trial information was retrieved from EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed using the search terms “buprenorphine” AND “chronic” AND “pain.”

Results

A total of 33 clinical studies were ultimately used in this review, including 29 (88%) on transdermal buprenorphine and 4 (12%) on buprenorphine buccal film. Although the measure of pain intensity varied among studies, each of these 33 trials demonstrated efficacy for buprenorphine in pain relief. A total of 28 studies also assessed safety, with each concluding that buprenorphine was generally well tolerated.

Conclusion

Comparison of current clinical data along with results of responder and safety analyses support the use of buprenorphine over full μ-opioid receptor agonists for effective preferential treatment of chronic pain; however, head-to-head clinical studies are warranted.

Treating pain in patients with dementia and the possible concomitant relief of symptoms of agitation

Dementia is an irreversible, progressive form of cognitive dysfunction that can affect memory, learning ability, thinking, orientation, comprehension, calculation, linguistic skills and executive function but which does not impair consciousness. Pain prevalence is high among the elderly who are also at elevated risk for dementia. Pain control for dementia patients is important but can be challenging for clinicians as cognitive deficits can make it difficult to identify, localize and assess pain. Cerebral changes associated with dementia may change how people process and experience pain in ways that are not entirely elucidated. Agitation is a frequent symptom of dementia and may be associated with untreated pain as agitation and aggression symptoms decrease when pain is effectively addressed.

Driving under the influence of opioids: What prescribers should know

Opioids affect the central nervous system and are known to produce dizziness, sleepiness, mood changes, and other actions that in some people have a negative impact on psychomotor or mental performance. The negative effects can be exacerbated in persons who are taking other prescription medications or illegal substances. Opioid-abusing drivers clearly represent an unnecessary danger to the public; although the vast majority of patients taking prescription opioids for pain safely drive to work and other activities, a subset may be impaired, but not be aware of or recognize the problem. The majority of pain patients would likely be surprised to learn that the legal systems in most parts of the world, including most states in the United States, do not differentiate between a pain patient taking a prescribed opioid at the right dose and frequency, and an abuser taking an illegal drug. For example, in some parts of the United States, a driver may be initially stopped for a relatively minor offense and, if the officer notices that the driver is wearing a fentanyl patch, charged with driving under the influence of drugs (DUID). The present narrative review attempts to highlight the existing problem, the different legal thresholds for arrest and prosecution for DUID, and the challenge of trying to have zero-tolerance for driving under the influence of a drug used illegally, while at the same time not arresting legitimate patients who are taking pain medication as prescribed. There is a clear and present need for an integrated assessment and addressing of the current confounding situation.

e-Cigarettes for smoking cessation: Do they deliver?

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are battery-powered devices that allow nicotine and/or other substances to be inhaled in aerosolized form. e-Cigarettes (electronic cigarettes), the most commonly used ENDS, have been proposed to be smoking cessation aids. However, despite the rapid surge in their popularity, little is known about long-term health consequences of e-cigarette usage. We assess published data to see if they deliver what they promise.

COMMENT

e-Cigarettes may contain uncertain quantities of various ingredients, and evidence of adulteration has been identified. Flavouring agents can alter the pharmacokinetics of nicotine and have uncertain impact on the nature of e-cigarette use (eg ab initio use vs smoking cessation).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Although e-cigarettes have been proposed to be a safe approach to encouraging smoking cessation, there are inconsistencies in available data. And further data are needed regarding long-term implications of primary and secondary exposure to e-cigarette products.

Sunscreen bans: Coral reefs and skin cancer

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Hawaii will ban two major ingredients of sunscreens. This article reviews the reasons and future directions. Hawaii recently enacted legislation that will ban the use of two major ingredients of the majority of commonly used sunscreens. The reason for the ban is the ingredients' putative deleterious impact on marine ecosystems, particularly coral reefs. But sunscreens also save lives by decreasing the risk of UV-induced skin cancers. We review both sides of the issue and potential implications for the healthcare system.

COMMENT

Coral reefs consist of organisms in delicate equilibria that are susceptible to small changes in their surroundings. Recent natural and man-made disruptions, direct or indirect, such as changes in ocean temperature and chemistry, ingress of invasive species, pathogens, pollution and deleterious fishing practices, have been blamed for the poor health, or even the outright destruction, of some coral reefs. The most popular sunscreen products contain two ingredients-oxybenzone and octinoxate-that have also been implicated in coral toxicity and will be banned. This creates a healthcare dilemma: Will the protection of coral reefs result in an increase in human skin cancers?

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Concentration estimates and mechanism studies support an association-direct or indirect (via promotion of viral infection)-of sunscreens with bleaching of coral reefs. A ban on the two most common sunscreen ingredients goes into effect in Hawaii on January 1, 2021. Proponents suggest that this is a trend, just the first of many such bans worldwide; opponents warn of a dire increase in human skin cancers. As a result, alternative sunscreen compounds are being sought.

Discovery of "folded DNA" structures in human cells: Potential drug targets

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The double-helical conformation of human DNA (hDNA) is so axiomatic that it is called the "canonical" form. Recently, though, intrastrand folds ("I-motifs" and "G-quadruplexes") have been identified in hDNA. These could be targets for novel drug discovery.

COMMENT

Any interruption of the canonical form of hDNA fundamentally impacts the normal progression of transduction and translation. In particular, the synthesis of receptors and cognate protein ligands would be affected, as well as their affinity for-and signal transduction of-pharmacotherapeutic agents. Recent studies have identified normally occurring, folded structures superimposed on the usual double-helix motif of hDNA.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The newly identified "folded DNA" structures ("I-motifs" and "G-quadruplexes") could represent novel drug-discovery targets, most likely for cancer.

Curcumin in turmeric: Basic and clinical evidence for a potential role in analgesia

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Current analgesic pharmacotherapy-opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen (paracetamol) and related drugs-is effective for acute pain, but their use is limited by adverse effects on the renal, hepatic, cardiovascular or gastrointestinal systems, or they have potential for abuse. Therefore, alternative options are desired. Compounds used in traditional medicine might offer such alternatives, but the evidence must be based on pharmacologic properties and on clinical trial data. This review summarizes the evidence for one of these: the analgesic properties of turmeric and other curcumins.

METHODS

The PubMed database and other sources were searched using keywords related to turmeric, curcumin, antinociception and analgesia. Primary sources and reviews of preclinical and clinical studies were identified, assessed and summarized. Bibliographies within these sources provided additional information.

RESULTS

Turmeric has consistently been demonstrated to produce analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects in animal models and in clinical trials, and appears to have less serious adverse effects than many current analgesics.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Turmeric (curcumin) appears to be a possible candidate for consideration for use as a stand-alone analgesic, or in analgesic combinations as part of opioid-, NSAID- or paracetamol (acetaminophen)-sparing strategies.

Tapentadol Extended Release in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis Pain

Tapentadol is a novel pain reliever with apparently synergistic dual mechanisms of action, capable of addressing both nociceptive and neuropathic components of chronic pain. As an effective analgesic with good tolerability, tapentadol may be appropriate for patients suffering from severe chronic pain associated with low back pain (LBP) or osteoarthritis (OA). Efficacy studies of tapentadol in populations of patients with severe chronic LBP or OA pain suggest that tapentadol is non-inferior to oxycodone. Its tolerability, especially with respect to gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, may be better than that of other strong opioids in clinical trials and analyses of multiple trials. Patient satisfaction with tapentadol extended release for chronic noncancer pain syndromes is good. Although tapentadol has an opioid component with abuse liability, it appears to be a difficult opioid for tampering with less appeal to abusers than other opioids. For patients with severe LBP and OA pain, tapentadol appears to hold promise as a safe, effective therapeutic option.

Abuse-deterrent opioids: an update on current approaches and considerations

OBJECTIVE

Abuse and misuse of prescription opioids is a significant public health concern. This review examines the strategies used to confer abuse-deterrent properties on opioid abuse-deterrent formulations (ADFs), the characteristics and supporting data for each of the available ADFs, and the role of opioid ADFs as part of a comprehensive opioid risk management plan.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for articles published within the last 10 years using the search terms "abuse deterrent opioids". Articles were limited to clinical studies and reviews focusing on United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved opioid ADFs in the US.

RESULTS

There are currently nine extended-release and one immediate-release opioid pain medications with US FDA-approved ADF labelling. All use either physical and chemical barriers or agonist/antagonist combinations to deter manipulation and abuse. Evidence is mounting that introduction of opioid ADFs has been associated with decreased rates of abuse and diversion of opioids in the US.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not sufficient by themselves to prevent prescription opioid abuse and misuse, opioid ADFs are an important component of a healthcare provider's comprehensive opioid risk management plan (along with utilization of prescription drug monitoring programs, clinical assessment tools, urine tests, co-prescribing of naloxone to patients at risk of an overdose, access to non-pharmacological treatments and addiction/mental health resources, among others). Adoption of opioid ADFs should be considered as part of an overall public health opioid risk management plan involving all stakeholders to balance legitimate safe and effective use of opioids against misuse and abuse.

The role and mechanism of action of menthol in topical analgesic products

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Menthol has been used as a non-opioid pain reliever since ancient times. A modern understanding of its molecular mechanism of action could form the basis for generating targets for discovery of novel non-opioid analgesic drugs.

METHODS

The PubMed database was queried using search words related to menthol, pain and analgesia. The results were limited to relevant preclinical studies and clinical trials and reviews published in English during the past 5 years, which yielded 31 reports. The bibliographies of these articles were sources of additional supporting articles.

RESULTS

Menthol is a selective activator of transient receptor potential melastatin-8 (TRPM8) channels and is also a vasoactive compound. As a topical agent, it acts as a counter-irritant by imparting a cooling effect and by initially stimulating nociceptors and then desensitizing them. Topically applied menthol may also activate central analgesic pathways. At high concentrations, menthol may generate cold allodynia.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Recent elucidation of TRPM8 channels has provided a molecular basis for understanding the molecular action of menthol and its ability to produce both a cooling sensation and reduction in pain associated with a wide variety of pain(ful) conditions. The more modern mechanistic understanding of menthol and its pharmacologic mechanism of action may lead to an expanded role for this substance in the search for replacements for opioid analgesics, particularly those that can be applied topically.

Nature's first "atypical opioids": Kratom and mitragynines

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Advances in pain research have led to an understanding that many pains are driven by more than one underlying (patho)physiologic cause (ie, they are "multimechanistic") and that better pain relief is obtained with fewer adverse effects when an analgesic is correspondingly multimechanistic. At least two of the more-modern analgesics combine opioid and non-opioid mechanisms, and have become known as "atypical opioids." Less well known is that just as Nature evolved opioids, it also evolved atypical opioids, presaging modern drug discovery efforts.

COMMENT

Traditional (typical) opioids are extracts or analogs of substances derived from the poppy plant. They produce their analgesic and adverse effects primarily through a single, opioid mechanism (albeit with individual differences). Two most recent analgesics were developed to have both an opioid mechanism and, a second, non-opioid mechanism of action (inhibition of monoamine neurotransmitter reuptake). Little known is that Nature had already evolved a plant source of compounds with the same properties.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

As debate about the use and abuse potential of kratom swirls, conflicting, often contradicting, opinions are expressed. A review of the basic pharmacology of kratom reveals the explanation for the bifurcation in viewpoints: kratom has both opioid and non-opioid properties. Fascinatingly, just as the poppy plant (Papaver) evolved the typical opioids, Mitragyna evolved the mitragynines-Nature's "atypical opioids."

Pharmacokinetics of Oral and Intravenous Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) When Co-Administered with Intravenous Morphine in Healthy Adult Subjects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Several features favor paracetamol (acetaminophen) administration by the intravenous rather than the oral route in the postoperative setting. This study compared the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of oral and intravenous paracetamol when given with or without an opioid, morphine.

METHODS

In this randomized, single-blind, parallel, repeat-dose study in healthy adults, subjects received four repeat doses of oral or intravenous 1000 mg paracetamol at 6-h intervals, and morphine infusions (0.125 mg/kg) at the 2nd and 3rd intervals. Comparisons of plasma pharmacokinetic profiles were conducted before, during, and after opioid co-administrations.

RESULTS

Twenty-two subjects were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Observed paracetamol peak concentration (C max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC0-6) were reduced when oral paracetamol was co-administered with morphine (reduced from 11.6 to 7.25 µg/mL and from 31.00 to 25.51 µg·h/mL, respectively), followed by an abruptly increased C max and AUC0-6 upon discontinuation of morphine (to 13.5 µg/mL and 52.38 µg·h/mL, respectively). There was also a significantly prolonged mean time to peak plasma concentration (T max) after the 4th dose of oral paracetamol (2.84 h) compared to the 1st dose (1.48 h). However, pharmacokinetic parameters of paracetamol were not impacted when intravenous paracetamol was co-administered with morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

Morphine co-administration significantly impacted the pharmacokinetics of oral but not intravenous paracetamol. The abrupt release of accumulated paracetamol at the end of morphine-mediated gastrointestinal inhibition following oral but not intravenous administration of paracetamol suggests that intravenous paracetamol provides a better option for the management of postoperative pain. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02848729.

Managing severe pain and abuse potential: the potential impact of a new abuse-deterrent formulation oxycodone/naltrexone extended-release product

Proper management of severe pain represents one of the most challenging clinical dilemmas. Two equally important goals must be attained: the humanitarian/medical goal to relieve suffering and the societal/legal goal to not contribute to the drug abuse problem. This is an age-old problem, and the prevailing emphasis placed on one or the other goal has resulted in pendulum swings that have resulted in either undertreatment of pain or the current epidemic of misuse and abuse. In an effort to provide efficacious strong pain relievers (opioids) that are more difficult to abuse by the most dangerous routes of administration, pharmaceutical companies are developing products in which the opioid is manufactured in a formulation that is designed to be tamper resistant. Such a product is known as an abuse-deterrent formulation (ADF). ADF opioid products are designed to deter or resist abuse by making it difficult to tamper with the product and extracting the opioid for inhalation or injection. To date, less than a dozen opioid formulations have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to carry specific ADF labeling, but this number will likely increase in the coming years. Most of these products are extended-release formulations.

The role of cannabinoids in pain control: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Cannabinoids appear to possess many potential medical uses, which may extend to pain control. A narrative review of the literature has found a variety of studies testing botanical and synthetic cannabinoids in different pain syndromes (acute pain, cancer pain, chronic noncancer pain, fibromyalgia pain, migraine, neuropathic pain, visceral pain, and others). Results from these studies are mixed; cannabinoids appear to be most effective in controlling neuropathic pain, allodynia, medication-rebound headache, and chronic noncancer pain, but do not seem to offer any advantage over nonopioid analgesics for acute pain. Cannabinoids seem to work no better than placebo for visceral pain and conferred only modest analgesic effect in cancer pain. Cannabinoids do many good things - they appear to be effective in treating certain types of pain without the issues of tolerance associated with opioids. Negatively, marijuana currently has a very murky legal status all over the world - laws regulating its use are inconsistent and in flux. Thus, both patients and prescribers may be unsure about whether or not it is an appropriate form of pain control. Cannabinoid-based analgesia has been linked to potential memory deficits and cognitive impairment. A great deal more remains to be elucidated about cannabinoids which may emerge to play an important role in the treatment of neuropathic and possibly other painful conditions. There remains a great deal more to learn about the role of cannabinoids in pain management.

Going beyond prescription pain relievers to understand the opioid epidemic: the role of illicit fentanyl, new psychoactive substances, and street heroin

The opioid epidemic is associated with morbidity and mortality, and it has taken a vast toll on American society. While prescription opioid abuse is part of the opioid problem, it is by no means the entirety of it. Opioid abuse appears to have entered a technology-driven new world of clandestine labs all over the globe and many new synthetic analog, counterfeit, and adulterated drugs that arrive via the internet faster than the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) can catalog and outlaw them. To deal with opioid abuse, it must be recognized that it is more - far more - than a subset of chronic pain patients who become addicted. Indeed, to reduce the opioid epidemic to this population is to misunderstand it. The opioid epidemic involves illicit opioids, counterfeit opioids, new psychoactive substances, diverted opioids, and prescription opioids. The objective of this narrative review is to consider the roles of all substances that contribute to the opioid epidemic in America.

The fentanyl family: A distinguished medical history tainted by abuse

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Beginning in the 1950s, a family of potent opioids was synthesized and developed (fentanyl and analogues). They continue to serve as valuable analgesic agents. But the recent spike and notoriety of their abuse has raised alarm, even calls for tighter control. We review the trajectory of these compounds.

COMMENT

To rectify shortcomings of the then available opioid analgesics, an analogue family of compounds was synthesized having a piperidine ring (presumptive principal active moiety in morphine and meperidine). The result was more potent and rapid-acting compounds, including alfentanil, carfentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil and others. These properties, plus availability in formulations for multiple routes of administration, impart broad therapeutic utility. They also unfortunately favour abuse.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The abuse of fentanyl and its analogues (legal and illicit) serves as a case study for the dilemma and difficulties balancing a medical need against psychosocial realities. The fentanyl family provides relief for severe pain, but their very properties also engender abuse.

The effects of food on opioid-induced nausea and vomiting and pharmacological parameters: a systematic review

Opioids remain the standard of care for treating moderate to severe pain resulting from surgery or injury in cases of acute pain, and are recommended for patients who have not responded to nonopioid analgesics. Effective management of pain has an impact on clinical course and often depends on achieving an acceptable balance between opioid efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Common opioid-related adverse events such as nausea and vomiting are associated with an overall lower achievement of effective pain management and patient satisfaction. However, in practice, clinicians employ various strategies to maximize efficacy, minimize these adverse effects, and ensure the careful, judicious, and evidence-based use of opioids for patients who require them. Typical strategies for management and minimization of these types of adverse events include dose reduction, dose titration, opioid rotation, prescription for an antiemetic, and recommending the patient take opioids with food. Overall, the most straightforward approach that clinicians tend to employ that does not require additional visits or adjustment of prescriptions, is to recommend patients take opioids with food. However, given the current climate with opioids, it is critical and imperative that decisions for use of opioids be grounded in a solid and thorough evidence-base. In fact, several opioids are recommended to be taken explicitly with or without food because of interactions with abuse-deterrent technologies that can cause increased adverse events or inadequate analgesia. Therefore, we sought to review, synthesize, and summarize the literature for randomized, controlled trials and other studies to support the hypothesis that taking opioids with food reduces opioid-related events such as nausea and vomiting. Based on the current evidence we surveyed, the recommendation to take opioids with food does not appear to consistently and unequivocally reduce nausea and vomiting and, in many cases, increases the frequency of these adverse events in the studies we examined.

Use of immediate-release opioids as supplemental analgesia during management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain with buprenorphine transdermal system

Background

The buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) is approved in the US for the management of chronic pain. Due to its high affinity for μ-opioid receptors with a slow dissociation profile, buprenorphine may potentially displace or prevent the binding of competing μ-opioid-receptor agonists, including immediate-release (IR) opioids, in a dose-dependent manner. Health care professionals may assume that the use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during BTDS therapy is not acceptable.

Materials and methods

This post hoc analysis evaluated the use of IR opioids as supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate–severe chronic pain with BTDS at 52 US sites (BUP3015S, NCT01125917). Patients were categorized into IR-opioid and no-IR-opioid groups. At each visit of the extension phase, adverse events, concomitant medications, and information from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were recorded.

Results

The most common supplemental IR opioids prescribed during BTDS treatment (n=354) were hydrocodone–acetaminophen and oxycodone–acetaminophen. The mean daily dose of IR opioids (morphine equivalents) for supplemental analgesia was 22 mg. At baseline, BPI – pain intensity and BPI – interference scores were higher for patients in the IR-opioid group. In both treatment groups, scores improved by week 4, and then were maintained throughout 6 months of the open-label extension trial. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Patients who were prescribed IR opioids reported lower scores for BPI pain intensity and pain interference to levels similar to patients receiving BTDS without IR opioids, without increasing the rate or severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. Patients prescribed concomitant use of IR opioids with BTDS had greater treatment persistence. The results of this post hoc analysis provide support for the concomitant use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate–severe chronic pain with BTDS.

Considering tapentadol as a first-line analgesic: 14 questions

Tapentadol is the newest centrally acting analgesic to be approved by the US FDA and regulatory bodies in other countries. It has been called the first-in-class of a novel-acting analgesic mechanism of action that combines µ-opioid receptor agonist activity with neuronal norepinephrine-reuptake inhibition in a single molecule. This duality of action should combine inhibition of ascending (afferent) pain-transmitting signals with activation of descending (efferent) pain-attenuating systems (e.g., diffuse noxious inhibitory controls). However, not all novel mechanisms of action impart the characteristics needed for an analgesic to be considered for first-line therapy. These key questions may help inform clinical decision making.