1
|
Ghanei M, Ghalebaghi B, Sami R, Torabizadeh M, Mirsadraee M, Amra B, Tavakol M, Raji H, Fallahpour M, Kiani A, Abedini A, Jabbari Azad F, Mahdaviani SA, Attaran D, Samet M, Tavana S, Haddadzadeh shoushtari M, Nazari J, AghaeiMeybodi F, Fazlollahi MR, Ghasemi R, Sabzvari A, Kafi H, Idani E. Efficacy and safety of a proposed omalizumab biosimilar compared to the reference product in the management of uncontrolled moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: a multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, equivalency clinical trial. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1425906. [PMID: 39136011 PMCID: PMC11317399 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1425906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Allergic asthma has a considerable burden on the quality of life. A significant portion of moderate-to-severe allergic asthma patients need omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin-E monoclonal antibody, as an add-on therapy. In this phase III clinical trial P043 (Zerafil®, CinnaGen, Iran) efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were compared with Xolair® (the originator omalizumab). The primary outcome was the rate of protocol-defined asthma exacerbations. Methods Exacerbation rates, Asthma Control Test (ACT) results, spirometry measurements, immunogenicity, and safety were evaluated. Each subject received either medication with a dose ranging from 150 to 375 mg based on pre-treatment serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg) every two or four weeks for a duration of 28 weeks. Results Exacerbation rates were 0.150 (CI: 0.079-0.220) in the P043 group, and 0.190 (CI: 0.110-0.270) in the omalizumab group (per-protocol). The least squares mean differences of predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in the First second (FEV1) were -2.51% (CI: -7.17-2.15, P=0.29) and -3.87% (CI: -8.79-1.04, P=0.12), pre- and post-bronchodilator use. The mean ± SD of ACT scores at the screening and the last visit were 10.62 ± 2.93 and 20.93 ± 4.26 in P043 and 11.09 ± 2.75 and 20.46 ± 5.11 in the omalizumab group. A total of 288 adverse events were reported for the 256 enrolled participants. Among all, "dyspnea" and "headache" were the most reported ones. The overall incidence of adverse events (P=0.62) and serious adverse events (P=0.07) had no significant differences between the two groups. None of the samples were positive for anti-drug antibodies. Conclusion P043 was equivalent to omalizumab in the management of asthma in reduction of exacerbations. There was no significant difference in other efficacy and safety parameters. Clinical trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05813470) and www.IRCT.ir (IRCT20150303021315N20).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Ghanei
- Chemical Injuries Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Babak Ghalebaghi
- Ear, Nose, Throat and Head and Neck Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ramin Sami
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Khorshid Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mehdi Torabizadeh
- Golestan Hospital Clinical Research Development Unit, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Majid Mirsadraee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Babak Amra
- Bamdad Respiratory and Sleep Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Marzieh Tavakol
- Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
| | - Hanieh Raji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Air Pollution and Respiratory Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Morteza Fallahpour
- Allergy Department, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arda Kiani
- Tracheal Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran
| | - Atefeh Abedini
- Chronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Seyed Alireza Mahdaviani
- Pediatric Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Davood Attaran
- Respiratory & Critical Care Division, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mohammad Samet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Sasan Tavana
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Clinical Research and Development Center, Shahid Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Haddadzadeh shoushtari
- Air Pollution and Respiratory Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Javad Nazari
- Lung Department, Ebnesina Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - FatemehAlsadat AghaeiMeybodi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Fazlollahi
- Immunology, Asthma and Allergy Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ramin Ghasemi
- Eisabne Maryam Hospital, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Araz Sabzvari
- CinnaGen Medical Biotechnology Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
| | - Hamidreza Kafi
- Medical Department, Orchid Pharmed Company, Tehran, Iran
| | - Esmaeil Idani
- Pulmonary Rehabilitation Research Center (PRRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang W, Li J, Zou C, Zhao L, Zhu Y, Guo Y, Wang F. Omalizumab for Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma in real-world clinical setting: a prospective, observational study. BMJ Open Respir Res 2023; 10:e001549. [PMID: 37734750 PMCID: PMC10514615 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma in real-world clinical practice. METHODS This single-centre, prospective, observational study included Chinese patients aged 14-75 years with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma according to the Global Initiative for Asthma criteria. Omalizumab was administered subcutaneously, and the investigator collected real-world data on exacerbations, steroid exposure, pulmonary function and laboratory assessments at weeks 16, 24, 52, 104 and 156 after treatment initiation. The primary outcome was reduced exacerbations, measured as the proportion of patients with exacerbations in the year following omalizumab initiation. Bowker's test for paired proportions was performed to compare exacerbation rates before and after treatment initiation. A generalised linear mixed model was used to compare the number of exacerbations. RESULTS The mean treatment duration was 46.6 weeks for the full analysis set (n=398). The proportion of patients with exacerbations in the year before and after omalizumab initiation was 80.4% (181/225) and 18.7% (42/225) (difference: -61.8%, 95% CI -68.5 to -54.0, p<0.0001), respectively. At week 52, 67.4% of patients discontinued oral corticosteroids, and 19.5% reduced inhaled corticosteroids. The Asthma Control Test scores increased by 4.6 at week 52 from baseline (p<0.001). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s increased by 11.2% and 9.0% at weeks 24 and 52, respectively, from baseline (p<0.01). Injection site reactions (5.2%) were the most frequently reported adverse event. CONCLUSIONS In real-world clinical practice, omalizumab treatment remarkably reduced exacerbations in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. Omalizumab reduced the use of oral corticosteroids and improved asthma control and pulmonary function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Wang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jieying Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Congying Zou
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lifang Zhao
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ya Zhu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Guo
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Feiran Wang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gvalani A, Athavale A, Gupta D. Biomarkers in severe asthma: Identifying the treatable trait. Lung India 2023; 40:59-67. [PMID: 36695260 PMCID: PMC9894287 DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_271_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Asthma is a chronic condition of bronchial hyper-reactivity associated with inflammation ranges from mild to severe form. It affects 1 - 18% of the population globally and it is estimated that > 300million people in the world have asthma. Of this 5 - 10% have severe asthma. while the proportion of patients suffering from severe are smaller, the morbidity and mortality are higher in this group. With the advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of asthma there is a need to understand the role of various biomarkers. We live in an era of precision medicine and today there is a clear unmet need to understand targeted therapies. This review aims to raise awareness to the available biomarkers used in clinical practice in India and their role in predicting response to targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aanchal Gvalani
- Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amita Athavale
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and EPRC, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Disha Gupta
- Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li Y, Li X, Zhang B, Yu Q, Lu Y. Predictive biomarkers for response to omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Respir Med 2022; 16:1023-1033. [PMID: 35730466 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2022.2092100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predicting omalizumab treatment response has been a challenge and significant aspect for selecting suitable severe allergic asthma patients for omalizumab use. OBJECTIVE To determine which domains of pretreatment baseline characteristics predict omalizumab treatment response among asthmatic patients. METHODS Electronic bases were searched for eligible studies that reported potential biomarkers that could predict omalizumab responsiveness and efficacy. Patients who accepted omalizumab treatment were stratified into responders and non-responders. WMD, OR, and their 95%CI were used to access the differences between those omalizumab receivers. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted for potential heterogeneity. RESULTS A total of 41 studies evaluating efficacy predictors of omalizumab were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that omalizumab responders had significantly younger age in the adult subgroup, higher pretreatment total serum IgE level, percent predicted FEV1 and FeNO than that non-responder. We further confirmed that higher blood eosinophil counts and total serum IgE levels are useful markers for selecting asthma patients who may benefit more from omalizumab. CONCLUSIONS Pre-treatment blood eosinophil counts and total serum IgE level can be a useful efficacy predictor in selecting allergic asthma patients for omalizumab treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaqin Li
- Department of Pediatric, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoyan Li
- Department of Pediatric, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Biyu Zhang
- Department of Pediatric, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Yu
- Department of Pediatric, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanming Lu
- Department of Pediatric, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Omalizumab: An Optimal Choice for Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12020165. [PMID: 35207654 PMCID: PMC8878072 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Omalizumab is the first monoclonal antibody that was globally approved as a personalized treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. This review summarizes the knowledge of almost two decades of use of omalizumab to answer some important everyday clinical practice questions, concerning its efficacy and safety and its association with other asthma-related and drug-related parameters. Evidence suggests that omalizumab improves asthma control and reduces the incidence and frequency of exacerbations in patients with severe allergic asthma. Omalizumab is also effective in those patients in reducing corticosteroid use and healthcare utilization, while it also seems to improve lung function. Several biomarkers have been recognized in predicting its efficacy in its target group of patients, while the optimal duration for evaluating its efficacy is between 16 and 32 weeks.
Collapse
|
6
|
Calzetta L, Aiello M, Frizzelli A, Bertorelli G, Rogliani P, Chetta A. Oral Corticosteroids Dependence and Biologic Drugs in Severe Asthma: Myths or Facts? A Systematic Review of Real-World Evidence. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22137132. [PMID: 34281184 PMCID: PMC8269277 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22137132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Airway inflammation represents an important characteristic in asthma, modulating airflow limitation and symptom control, and triggering the risk of asthma exacerbation. Thus, although corticosteroids represent the cornerstone for the treatment of asthma, severe patients may be dependent on oral corticosteroids (OCSs). Fortunately, the current humanised monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab, and reslizumab have been proven to induce an OCS-sparing effect in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), thus overcoming the problem of OCS dependence in severe asthma. Nevertheless, a large discrepancy has been recognized between selected patients enrolled in RCTs and non-selected asthmatic populations in real-world settings. It is not possible to exclude that the OCS-sparing effect of mAbs resulting from the RCTs could be different than the real effect resulting in clinical practice. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and correlation analysis to assess whether mAbs are effective in eliciting an OCS-sparing effect and overcoming the OCS dependence in severe asthmatic patients in real-world settings. Overall, real-world studies support the evidence that OCS dependence is a real condition that, however, can be found only in a small number of really severe asthmatic patients. In most patients, the dependence on OCS can be related to modifying factors that, when adequately modulated, may lead to a significant reduction or suspension of OCS maintenance. Conversely, in severe asthmatics in whom OCS resistance is proved by a high daily dose intake, mAbs allow reversion of the OCS dependence, leading to the suspension of OCS therapy in most patients or >50% reduction in the daily OCS dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigino Calzetta
- Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (M.A.); (A.F.); (G.B.); (A.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Marina Aiello
- Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (M.A.); (A.F.); (G.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Annalisa Frizzelli
- Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (M.A.); (A.F.); (G.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Giuseppina Bertorelli
- Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (M.A.); (A.F.); (G.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Paola Rogliani
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Alfredo Chetta
- Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (M.A.); (A.F.); (G.B.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bousquet J, Humbert M, Gibson PG, Kostikas K, Jaumont X, Pfister P, Nissen F. Real-World Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Severe Allergic Asthma: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:2702-2714. [PMID: 33486142 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of clinical outcomes in the real-world corroborates findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis evaluated real-world data of omalizumab on treatment response, lung function, exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), health care resource utilization (HCRU), and school/work absenteeism at 4, 6, and 12 months after treatment. METHODS Observational studies in patients with severe allergic asthma (≥6 years) treated with omalizumab for ≥16 weeks, published from January 2005 to October 2018, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. A random-effects model was used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS In total, 86 publications were included. Global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) was good/excellent in 77% patients at 16 weeks (risk difference: 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.84; I2 = 96%) and in 82% patients at 12 months (0.82, 0.73-0.91; 97%). The mean improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 160, 220, and 250 mL at 16 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. There was a decrease in Asthma Control Questionnaire score at 16 weeks (-1.14), 6 months (-1.56), and 12 months (-1.13) after omalizumab therapy. Omalizumab significantly reduced annualized rate of severe exacerbations (risk ratio [RR]: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.30-0.56; I2 = 96%), proportion of patients receiving OCS (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47-0.75; I2 = 96%), and number of unscheduled physician visits (mean difference: -2.34, 95% CI: -3.54 to -1.13; I2 = 98%) at 12 months versus baseline. CONCLUSION The consistent improvements in GETE, lung function, and PROs, and reductions in asthma exacerbations, OCS use, and HCRU with add-on omalizumab in real-life confirm and complement the efficacy data of RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bousquet
- Contre les Maladies Chroniques pour un VIeillissement Actif (MACVIA) en France European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing Reference Site, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Marc Humbert
- School of Medicine, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM UMR_S 999, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis-Robinson, France; AP-HP, Department of Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Peter G Gibson
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; Priority Research Centre for Asthma and Respiratory Disease, the University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Konstantinos Kostikas
- Respiratory Medicine Department, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Faulkner KM, MacDonald K, Abraham I, Alhossan A, Lee CS. 'Real-world' effectiveness of omalizumab in adults with severe allergic asthma: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2020; 17:73-83. [PMID: 33307892 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2020.1856658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: Severe asthma affects 5-10% of the 350 million people with asthma worldwide. Findings from the authors' previous meta-analysis supported omalizumab use as an adjuvant treatment for severe allergic asthma. The publication of fourteen new articles necessitates an update of the meta-analysis.Objective: To evaluate the 'real-world' effectiveness of omalizumab in the treatment of acute allergic asthma in adults by calculating pooled effects estimates from data in published articles.Methods: Articles on omalizumab effectiveness in 'real-world' settings were identified. Effect sizes, including point estimates of the proportion of patients who met a given criteria, mean improvements relative to baseline, and change in the proportion of patients requiring oral corticosteroids compared to baseline were extracted. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to pool effect sizes based on proportions. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were calculated from means and standard deviations. Relative risk was calculated from changes in proportions. Variability within and between studies was evaluated.Results: Omalizumab increases the percentage of individuals rated 'good' or 'excellent' on the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness Scale. Omalizumab also improves respiratory function, quality-of-life, and asthma control while reducing medication usage, exacerbations, hospitalizations, and adverse events.Conclusion: 'Real-world' evidence continues to support the use of omalizumab as adjuvant treatment for severe allergic asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth M Faulkner
- Connell School of Nursing, Boston College William F, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.,School of Nursing, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | | | - Ivo Abraham
- Division of Research, Matrix45, Tucson, AZ, USA.,Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona Center For, Tucson, AZ, USA.,Pharmacy and College of Medicine, University of Arizona College Of, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Christopher S Lee
- Connell School of Nursing, Boston College William F, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cataldo D, Louis R, Michils A, Peché R, Pilette C, Schleich F, Ninane V, Hanon S. Severe asthma: oral corticosteroid alternatives and the need for optimal referral pathways. J Asthma 2020; 58:448-458. [PMID: 31928102 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1705335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with severe asthma require high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, with or without add-on treatments, to maintain asthma control. Because symptom control remains unsatisfactory in some patients despite these therapies, maintenance therapy with oral corticosteroids (OCS) remains considered a treatment option by physicians. Besides physician-diagnosed exacerbations, many patients intermittently self-medicate with OCS during episodes of worsening symptoms or as a prevention of such episodes. However, long-term OCS use is associated with several comorbidities that may decrease health-related quality of life, worsen prognosis, and should ideally require monitoring and management. In this review, we discuss the adverse effects of OCS use, the OCS-sparing effect of biologics in severe asthma, and the need for optimal referral pathways to ensure the best outcomes for those at-risk asthma patients. DATA SOURCES PubMed. STUDY SELECTION Studies with results on the OCS-sparing effect of biologics in adult severe asthma were selected. RESULTS Chronic and intermittent OCS use in asthma is associated with considerable adverse effects in asthma. Omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab reduce the need for OCS in severe asthma, while also reducing the exacerbation rate and improving several patient-related outcomes. CONCLUSION Targeted biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of uncontrolled severe asthma by reducing or even eliminating the need for OCS and improving other major outcomes. Novel agents are now rapidly increasing the therapeutic armamentarium, but additional efforts are needed to optimize referral pathways in order to ensure sustainable access to these therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didier Cataldo
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, CHU Liège, GIGA-Research, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Renaud Louis
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, CHU Liège, GIGA-Research, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Alain Michils
- Chest Department, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rudi Peché
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Vésale, Montigny-le-Tilleul, Belgium
| | - Charles Pilette
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, and Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Florence Schleich
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, CHU Liège, GIGA-Research, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Vincent Ninane
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Shane Hanon
- Respiratory Division, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Johnston A, Smith C, Zheng C, Aaron SD, Kelly SE, Skidmore B, Wells GA. Influence of prolonged treatment with omalizumab on the development of solid epithelial cancer in patients with atopic asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Allergy 2019; 49:1291-1305. [PMID: 31295369 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated whether prolonged treatment with omalizumab influences development or progression of solid epithelial cancer in patients with atopic asthma or chronic idiopathic urticaria. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention and observational studies. Randomized controlled trials were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, comparative observational studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and non-comparative observational studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies. DATA SOURCES We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and grey literature for eligible studies to November 2017. All searches were updated in January 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR INCLUDED STUDIES Randomized, quasi-randomized, controlled clinical trials and observational studies were included if they involved patients ≥ 12 years with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma or chronic idiopathic urticaria treated with omalizumab for ≥ 40 weeks. Eligible comparators included standard of care, placebo, cromoglycate or no treatment. RESULTS One hundred and sixty seven unique studies were eligible for inclusion; however, only twelve (7.2%, n = 11 758) reported any outcome of interest, none of which involved patients with urticaria. 195 cancer events were reported. We found no statistically significant increase in the odds of study-emergent solid epithelial cancer in patients randomized to long-term treatment with omalizumab compared to standard of care (Peto OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.11, 3.74, I2 = 41%). Less than one per cent of participants of non-comparative observational studies (n = 2350) were diagnosed with a solid epithelial tumour (meta-proportion: 0.86% [95% CI: 0.24, 1.86%, I2 = 56%]). In the only comparative observational study reporting on cancer, the proportion of study-emergent solid epithelial tumour events was nearly identical in both study groups (omalizumab: 2.3%, standard of care: 2.2%). CONCLUSIONS There is insufficient evidence to determine whether long-term treatment with omalizumab influences development or progression of solid epithelial cancer in these patient populations. PROSPERO registration # CRD 42018082211.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Johnston
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Christine Smith
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Carine Zheng
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Shawn D Aaron
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Shannon E Kelly
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - George A Wells
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gouder C, Gouder S, Montefort S. Self-reported satisfaction of patients receiving omalizumab for severe allergic asthma in Malta. Biologicals 2019; 60:24-27. [PMID: 31227304 DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment satisfaction is of utmost importance for ensuring adherence. Omalizumab is administered long-term if effective and well-tolerated in a hospital setting. The aim was to evaluate treatment satisfaction with omalizumab in Malta and to identify factors that may influence patients' satisfaction. A questionnaire was distributed to all asthmatic adult patients receiving omalizumab for at least one year. The questionnaire included demographic data, dosing regimen, asthma control test and the 14-item English version of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Version 1.4. The TSQM 1.4 domain scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent higher satisfaction. Our cohort included 33 patients (52% males), mean age 53.7 ± 11 years, mean baseline IgE level 510.6IU/ml, mean duration of treatment 3.8 ± 1.98 years and mean number of injections per month 4.6 ± 2.6. Median TSQM scores were as follows: graded effectiveness 78%, graded side effects 100%, graded convenience 74.2% and overall satisfaction 76%. Regression analysis showed that convenience score, effectiveness score and ACT score were significantly associated with global satisfaction. Global satisfaction scored high among the Maltese cohort of patients despite the inconvenience and side effects associated with receiving omalizumab. This is an add-on beneficial effect to the efficacy and effectiveness already been achieved with this medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gouder
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
| | - Simon Gouder
- Department of Physiotherapy, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Stephen Montefort
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
MacDonald KM, Kavati A, Ortiz B, Alhossan A, Lee CS, Abraham I. Short- and long-term real-world effectiveness of omalizumab in severe allergic asthma: systematic review of 42 studies published 2008-2018. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2019; 15:553-569. [PMID: 30763137 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2019.1574571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Omalizumab is a recombinant monoclonal anti-IgE antibody approved in the US as add-on treatment in moderate-to-severe allergic asthma (in severe allergic asthma [SAA] in Europe). A 2016 review of 24 real-world effectiveness studies in SAA published between 2008-2015 concluded that omalizumab was associated with significant improvements in objective and subjective outcomes with benefits extending beyond 2 years. Several new real-world studies have been published since, bringing the total to 42 studies. Areas covered: This systematic review of 42 studies published since 2008 updates and extends the 2016 review on the real-word evidence on omalizumab in SAA. It offers greater granularity as to time windows within which outcomes are reported and includes studies extending well beyond 4 years post omalizumab initiation. Expert commentary: This review firmly establishes the short-term effectiveness of omalizumab in adolescent and adult patients with SAA at 1 year, and provides strong evidence of long-term effectiveness up to 4 years and emergent evidence of effectiveness beyond 4 years. In the aggregate, these 42 studies underscore the long-term effectiveness of omalizumab in terms of: reducing exacerbations and symptoms, achieving asthma control, improving lung function, enhancing quality of life, decreasing emergency department visits and hospitalizations, and promoting concomitant medication-sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abhishek Kavati
- b Health Economics & Outcomes Research , Novartis , East Hanover , NJ , USA
| | - Benjamin Ortiz
- c Clinical Development & Medical Affairs , Novartis , East Hanover , NJ , USA
| | | | - Christopher S Lee
- a Division of Research , Matrix45 , Tucson , AZ , USA.,e Boston College , Connell School of Nursing , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Ivo Abraham
- a Division of Research , Matrix45 , Tucson , AZ , USA.,f Center for Health Outcomes and Pharmacoeconomic Research , University of Arizona , Tucson , AZ , USA.,g Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy , University of Arizona , Tucson , AZ , USA.,h Department of Family and Community Medicine , College of Medicine - Tucson, University of Arizona , Tucson , AZ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Katsaounou P, Buhl R, Brusselle G, Pfister P, Martínez R, Wahn U, Bousquet J. Omalizumab as alternative to chronic use of oral corticosteroids in severe asthma. Respir Med 2019; 150:51-62. [PMID: 30961951 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Systemic/oral corticosteroids (OCS) have been used for decades in the management of acute asthma exacerbations and chronically in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. However, while OCS are effective at treating acute exacerbations, there is only empirical evidence regarding the efficacy of OCS at reducing the rate of exacerbations. Evidence, although scarce, is suggestive of high exacerbation rates in severe asthma patients even when receiving maintenance treatment with OCS. In addition, use of OCS is associated with undesirable effects. Despite all this, physicians have continued to use OCS for managing severe asthma and acute exacerbation due to the lack of availability of effective alternatives. Fortunately, in the last decade several biologics have been proven safe and effective for patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. This has led to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommending the use of biologics, instead of maintenance OCS, in patients with severe asthma (GINA Step 5). These include one biologic targeting immunoglobulin E (IgE) (omalizumab), and different biologics targeting interleukin-5 (IL-5), the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R) or IL-4 receptor α-unit (IL-4R α), including mepolizumab (subcutaneous), reslizumab (intravenous), benralizumab (subcutaneous) and dupilumab (subcutaneous). Omalizumab for the treatment of severe allergic asthma reduces exacerbations, irrespective of blood eosinophil levels. Anti-IL-5/IL-5R biologics are indicated in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and repetitive exacerbations, irrespective of the presence or absence of allergy. Recently, an anti-IL4Rα biologic has been approved by the FDA for eosinophilic phenotype or oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Finally, physicians should consider using biologics as an alternative to chronic OCS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevi Katsaounou
- School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1st ICU Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Roland Buhl
- Pulmonary Department, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Guy Brusselle
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Epidemiology and Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Pascal Pfister
- Global Medical Department, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Rafael Martínez
- Global Medical Department, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ulrich Wahn
- Department of Paediatric Pneumology & Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jean Bousquet
- Service des Maladies Respiratoires, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Johansson SGO, Lilja G, Hallberg J, Nopp A. A clinical follow-up of omalizumab in routine treatment of allergic asthma monitored by CD-sens. IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE 2018; 6:382-391. [PMID: 29737044 PMCID: PMC6113766 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Omalizumab has been available for treatment of allergic asthma for more than a decade and thus, its efficacy in routine treatment was of interest to evaluate. Basophil allergen threshold sensitivity (CD‐sens) has been shown to correlate with the bronchial allergen threshold sensitivity and can be used to objectively measure omalizumab treatment efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the effect of omalizumab treatment of allergic asthma by CD‐sens, as an objective marker of the IgE‐mediated inflammation, and related to SPT, spirometry, FeNO, Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE). Methods Thirty‐two patients were treated with omalizumab for 16 weeks. CD‐sens was used to define the response and related to clinical parameters. If CD‐sens was negative (<0.1) (CD‐sens low Group) the patient continued with the standard dose. If CD‐sens was ≥0.1 (CD‐sens high Group) a second 16 weeks period with 25–50% dosage increase was started and evaluated after a total of 32 weeks. Results Nine of 32 patients became CD‐sens negative after treatment (CD‐sens start: 8.0; 16 weeks: <0.01) and regarded as successful. 15/23 were unsuccessful (CD‐sens start: 13; 16 weeks: 1.65) and the omalizumab dose was increased. CD‐sens decreased significantly (p < 0.05) and further 3/15 patients became CD‐sens negative (CD‐sens at 32 weeks: 0.5). There was a significantly smaller IgE‐ab fraction (IgE‐ab/IgE) in the CD‐sens low versus the CD‐sens high Group (p < 0.0001). A significant decrease in ACQ was seen in both groups after 16 weeks treatment (p = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). No significant changes could be detected for the other clinical parameters. Conclusion By the use of the objective laboratory method CD‐sens, which effectively measure the direct effect of omalizumab, that is, the IgE‐mediated part of the allergic asthma, in combination with clinical parameters it might be possible to more effectively monitor and treat IgE‐mediated allergic asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gunnar O Johansson
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Sachś Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Lilja
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Sachś Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jenny Hallberg
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Sachś Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Nopp
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Sachś Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Effects of omalizumab therapy on peripheral nerve functions: short observational study. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2018; 36:211-216. [PMID: 31320856 PMCID: PMC6627259 DOI: 10.5114/ada.2018.74834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common neurological condition causing symmetrical and diffuse damage in nerves. The etiology of PN includes systemic diseases, toxic exposure, medications, infections, and hereditary diseases. Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody that exerts its activity by binding to free IgE in circulation. Aim To investigate the relationship between omalizumab and peripheral neuropathy. Material and methods The study included 30 patients who underwent omalizumab therapy (Xolair) due to the diagnosis of chronic urticaria. A detailed neurological and physical examination was performed in each patient both before and 3 months after the therapy. Electrophysiological examination was also performed using a Medelec Synergy instrument. Results The 30 patients included 8 (26.7%) men and 22 (73.3%) women with a mean age of 37.5 ±14.14 years. No serious side effect of the medication was detected in any patient although local wound irritation occurred in 3 (10%) patients. Moreover, no change occurred in the pre-treatment Neuropathy Symptom Score (NSS) or Neurological Disability Score (NDS) of the patients and no pathological values that could result in neuropathy were observed during motor/sensory nerve conduction. However, significant changes were detected in the sensory and motor components of the nerves with regards to pre- and post-treatment values. Conclusions Omalizumab therapy caused no peripheral neuropathy in any of our patients but altered the latency, amplitude, and velocity values of the peripheral nerves.
Collapse
|
16
|
Al-Ahmad M, Arifhodzic N, Nurkic J, Maher A, Rodriguez-Bouza T, Al-Ahmed N, Sadek A, Jusufovic E. "Real-life" Efficacy and Safety Aspects of 4-Year Omalizumab Treatment for Asthma. Med Princ Pract 2018; 27:260-266. [PMID: 29414831 PMCID: PMC6062694 DOI: 10.1159/000487482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab in asthma in a real-life setting. SUBJECTS AND METHODS This 4-year observational study included 65 patients treated with omalizumab during clinic visits; treatment response was rated as excellent, good, and partial based on a modified physician's Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (mGETE) scale of emergency room visits (ERV), hospitalization, use of oral corticosteroids, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β-agonist (LABA) dose, and short-acting β-agonist rescue. The following tests were done: forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the asthma control test (ACT). Measurements were performed 1 month before therapy and at 16 weeks, 1 year, and 4 years of treatment. Statistical analyses were done using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman rank correlation, and McNemar χ2 test. RESULTS The dropout rate was 15 (18.5%): 8 nonresponders (10.0%); 2 patients died (2.5%), and 5 were lost to follow-up (6.25%). Treatment response was excellent in 35 (53.8%); good in 23 (35.4%), and partial in 7 patients (10.8%). The number of excellent responders increased from 35 (53.8%) at 16 weeks to 48 (73.8%) at the 4-year follow-up. The number of patients who did not require ERV improved from 0 to 59 (90.8%), and the lowest rate of hospitalization was 1 in year 4 (p < 0.001); patients who did not require courses of oral corticosteroids improved from 0 to 54 (83%). ICS/LABA dose significantly reduced from 65 (100%) to 25 (38.5%) after 4 years of treatment (p < 0.001); ACT scores significantly increased from 15 ± 3 at baseline to 23 ± 3 (p < 0.001) and FEV1 level from 55.6 ± 10.6 to 76.63 ± 10.34 at year 4. CONCLUSION In this study, omalizumab therapy resulted in better asthma control, and was effective and well tolerated as an add-on therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Al-Ahmad
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait
- Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait
- *Dr. Mona Al-Ahmad, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, PO Box 24923, Safat 13110 (Kuwait), E-Mail
| | | | - Jasmina Nurkic
- Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | - Ahmed Maher
- Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | | | - Nasser Al-Ahmed
- Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | - Ali Sadek
- National Center of Health Information, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | - Edin Jusufovic
- Cathedra for Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia-Herzegovina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Paganin F, Mangiapan G, Proust A, Prudhomme A, Attia J, Marchand-Adam S, Pellet F, Milhe F, Melloni B, Bernady A, Raspaud C, Nocent C, Berger P, Guilleminault L. Lung function parameters in omalizumab responder patients: An interesting tool? Allergy 2017; 72:1953-1961. [PMID: 28517027 DOI: 10.1111/all.13202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody, is used to treat patients with severe allergic asthma. The evolution of lung function parameters over time and the difference between omalizumab responder and nonresponder patients remain inconclusive. The objective of this real-life study was to compare the changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of omalizumab responders and nonresponders at 6 months. METHODS A multicenter analysis was performed in 10 secondary and tertiary institutions. Lung function parameters (forced vital capacity (FVC), pre- and postbronchodilator FEV1, residual volume (RV), and total lung capacity (TLC) were determined at baseline and at 6 months. Omalizumab response was assessed at the 6-month visit. In the omalizumab responder patients, lung function parameters were also obtained at 12, 18, and 24 months. RESULTS Mean prebronchodilator FEV1 showed improvement in responders at 6 months, while a decrease was observed in nonresponders (+0.2±0.4 L and -0.1±0.4 L, respectively, P<.01). After an improvement at 6 months, pre- and postbronchodilator FEV1 remained stable at 12, 18, and 24 months. The FEV1/FVC remained unchanged over time, but the proportion of patients with an FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7 decreased at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (55.2%, 54.0%, 54.0%, and 44.8%, respectively, P<.05). Mean RV values decreased at 6 months but increased at 12 months and 24 months (P<.05). Residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/TLC) ratio decreased at 6 months and remained unchanged at 24 months. CONCLUSION After omalizumab initiation, FEV1 improved at 6 months in responder patients and then remained stable for 2 years. RV and RV/TLC improved at 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Paganin
- INSERM U 600, UMR 6212; Université de la Méditerranée.; Marseille France
- Université de la Réunion; St Denis France
| | - G. Mangiapan
- Service de Pneumologie; CHIC de Créteil; Créteil France
| | - A. Proust
- Service de Pneumologie; CHU de Nimes; Tarbes France
| | - A. Prudhomme
- Service de Pneumologie; CHG de Bigorre; Tarbes France
| | - J. Attia
- Cabinet de Pneumologie; Bastia France
| | | | - F. Pellet
- Cabinet de Pneumologie; Bordeaux France
| | - F. Milhe
- Service de Pneumologie; Polyclinique des Fleurs; Ollioules France
| | - B. Melloni
- Service de Pneumologie; CHU de Limoges; Limoges France
| | - A. Bernady
- Service de Pneumologie; Centre médical Toki Eder; Cambo les Bains France
| | - C. Raspaud
- Service de Pneumologie; Clinique Pasteur; Toulouse France
| | - C. Nocent
- Service de Pneumologie et d'allergologie; CH de la côte Basque; Bayonne France
| | - P. Berger
- Centre de Recherche Cardio-thoracique de Bordeaux; Univ. Bordeaux, U1045, CIC1401; Bordeaux France
- Centre de Recherche Cardio-thoracique de Bordeaux; INSERM, U1045, CIC1401; Bordeaux France
- Service d'Exploration Fonctionnelle Respiratoire; CHU de Bordeaux, CIC1401; Pessac France
| | - L. Guilleminault
- Université de la Réunion; St Denis France
- Service de Pneumologie; CHU Reunion/GHSR; Saint-Pierre France
- INSERM; UMR 1188 Diabète Athérothrombose Thérapies Réunion Océan Indien (DéTROI); Sainte-Clotilde France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gouder C, Asciak R, Montefort S. Sex differences in the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of omalizumab after 1 year in Maltese patients with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2017; 118:513-514. [PMID: 28283278 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2016] [Revised: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
19
|
Niven RM, Saralaya D, Chaudhuri R, Masoli M, Clifton I, Mansur AH, Hacking V, McLain-Smith S, Menzies-Gow A. Impact of omalizumab on treatment of severe allergic asthma in UK clinical practice: a UK multicentre observational study (the APEX II study). BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011857. [PMID: 27507234 PMCID: PMC4985870 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the impact of omalizumab on asthma management in patients treated as part of normal clinical practice in the UK National Health Service (NHS). DESIGN A non-interventional, mixed methodology study, combining retrospective and prospective data collection for 12 months pre-omalizumab and post-omalizumab initiation, respectively. SETTING Data were collected in 22 UK NHS centres, including specialist centres and district general hospitals in the UK. PARTICIPANTS 258 adult patients (aged ≥16 years; 65% women) with severe persistent allergic asthma treated with omalizumab were recruited, of whom 218 (84.5%) completed the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was change in mean daily dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) between the 12-month pre-omalizumab and post-omalizumab initiation periods. A priori secondary outcome measures included response to treatment, changes in OCS dosing, asthma exacerbations, lung function, employment/education, patient-reported outcomes and hospital resource utilisation. RESULTS The response rate to omalizumab at 16 weeks was 82.4%. Comparing pre-omalizumab and post-omalizumab periods, the mean (95% CIs) daily dose of OCS decreased by 1.61 (-2.41 to -0.80) mg/patient/day (p<0.001) and hospital exacerbations decreased by 0.97 (-1.19 to -0.75) exacerbations/patient (p<0.001). Compared with baseline, lung function, assessed by percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 s, improved by 4.5 (2.7 to 6.3)% at 16 weeks (p<0.001; maintained at 12 months) and patient quality of life (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) improved by 1.38 (1.18 to 1.58) points at 16 weeks (p<0.001, maintained at 12 months). 21/162 patients with complete employment data gained employment and 6 patients lost employment in the 12-month post-omalizumab period. The mean number of A&E visits, inpatient hospitalisations, outpatient visits (excluding for omalizumab) and number of bed days/patient decreased significantly (p<0.001) in the 12-month post-omalizumab period. CONCLUSIONS These data support the beneficial effects of omalizumab on asthma-related outcomes, quality of life and resource utilisation in unselected patients treated in 'real-world' clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Niven
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester & University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dinesh Saralaya
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Rekha Chaudhuri
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Matthew Masoli
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Ian Clifton
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Adel H Mansur
- Birmingham Regional Severe Asthma Service, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Russell R, Brightling C. Mepolizumab for the reduction of exacerbations in severe eosinophilic asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med 2016; 10:607-17. [PMID: 27058452 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2016.1176532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Asthma affects over 300 million people worldwide and is severe in 10% of sufferers. Severe asthma is associated with greater morbidity and mortality particularly as a consequence of frequent exacerbations. Advances in approaches to phenotype the heterogeneity of severe asthma has established the importance of eosinophilic inflammation and emerging new therapies are broadly designed to target T2-mediated eosinophilic inflammation with the aim to reduce exacerbation frequency. Here, we summarize the evidence that eosinophilic asthma is an important pheno(endo)type and identifies a group at risk of exacerbations; that established therapies reduce exacerbations, particularly in eosinophilic severe asthma; and discuss the role of mepolizumab, an IL-5 neutralising monoclonal antibody therapy, in reducing exacerbations in severe eosinophilic asthma compared to established and other emerging therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Russell
- a Institute for Lung Health, Department of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, Glenfield Hospital , University of Leicester , Leicester , UK
| | - Christopher Brightling
- a Institute for Lung Health, Department of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, Glenfield Hospital , University of Leicester , Leicester , UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen HC, Huang CD, Chang E, Kuo HP. Efficacy of omalizumab (Xolair®) in patients with moderate to severe predominately chronic oral steroid dependent asthma in Taiwan: a retrospective, population-based database cohort study. BMC Pulm Med 2016; 16:3. [PMID: 26747278 PMCID: PMC4706688 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-015-0156-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2015] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Omalizumab (Xolair®), a recombinant monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials conducted in patients with moderate to severe persistent allergic asthma. We aimed to investigate the efficacy, discontinuation and medical resource utilization of omalizumab in the real-life setting in Taiwan. Methods This study was a retrospective, population-based database cohort study using the Taiwan NHIRD from 2007 to 2011 assessing the efficacy of omalizumab therapy over 4 months on changes in asthma medication, asthma control, frequency of exacerbations and hospitalization rates at baseline and after omalizumab discontinuation. Results There was a reduction in asthma medication post omalizumab therapy and severe exacerbations and hospitalizations from baseline (31.2 %, n = 282) to the end of follow-up (11.8 %, n = 144, p < 0.001). Nearly all the patients received chronic oral corticosteroids at baseline (92.4 %). The number of ER visits decreased from 1.13 ± 2.04 to 0.29 ± 0.83, and the mean number of admissions decreased from 5.93 ± 16.16 to 2.75 ± 12.02 from baseline to the end of follow-up (p < 0.001). After discontinuation of omalizumab, the cost of ER medical expenses decreased from New Taiwan dollars (NTD) 3934 at 2 months to NTD 2860 at 12 months. Conclusions Patients who received omalizumab therapy for over 4 months were more likely to reduce the use of other asthma medications and less likely to experience an asthma exacerbation, ER visits, and hospitalization, even after the discontinuation of omalizumab. These data suggest that omalizumab has efficacy in improving health outcomes in patients with moderate to severe predominately chronic oral steroid dependent asthma in the real-life setting in Taiwan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Cheng Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Paul's Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Chien-Da Huang
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Department of Thoracic Medicine and Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 199 Tun Hwa N. Rd., Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Erin Chang
- Master of Medicine Management (M.M.M.); Assistant HEOR Manager, Novartis, Taiwan.
| | - Han-Pin Kuo
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chiappori A, De Ferrari L, Folli C, Mauri P, Riccio AM, Canonica GW. Biomarkers and severe asthma: a critical appraisal. Clin Mol Allergy 2015; 13:20. [PMID: 26430389 PMCID: PMC4590266 DOI: 10.1186/s12948-015-0027-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Accepted: 08/04/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe asthma (SA) is a clinically and etiologically heterogeneous respiratory disease which affects among 5–10 % of asthmatic patients. Despite high-dose therapy, a large patients percentage is not fully controlled and has a poor quality of life. In this review, we describe the biomarkers actually known in scientific literature and used in clinical practice for SA assessment and management: neutrophils, eosinophils, periostin, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, exhaled breath condensate and galectins. Moreover, we give an overview on clinical and biological features characterizing severe asthma, paying special attention to the potential use of these ones as reliable markers. We finally underline the need to define different biomarkers panels to select patients affected by severe asthma for specific and personalized therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Chiappori
- DIMI-Department of Internal Medicine, Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU S.Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Laura De Ferrari
- DIMI-Department of Internal Medicine, Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU S.Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Folli
- DIMI-Department of Internal Medicine, Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU S.Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Mauri
- Institute for Biomedical Technologies, CNR, Segrate, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Riccio
- DIMI-Department of Internal Medicine, Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU S.Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- DIMI-Department of Internal Medicine, Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU S.Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|