The quick loss of carbapenem susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa at intensive care units

Risk factors and outcome associated with coinfection with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumanii: a descriptive analysis

Background

Nearly 30% of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) were previously shown to be coinfected with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) or Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Infections caused by multiple carbapenem-resistant pathogens present significant challenge to infection control and therapeutic management. The study objective was to identify risk factors for acquisition of multiple carbapenem-resistant pathogens and associated outcomes.

Methods

A descriptive analysis of adults infected with either CRKP alone or coinfected with CRPA or CRAB was performed. Patient groups were compared on demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome.

Results

86 patients with CRKP monoinfection and 60 patients with coinfections were evaluated. Respiratory tract was the predominant infection site for coinfected patients involving mostly CRPA whereas urinary tract was the primary site for CRKP-only group. More coinfected patients were severely debilitated, had prior carbapenem exposure (37% vs 13%, p<0.001) and history of pneumonia in the past year (67% vs 41%, p<0.01). More coinfected patients required direct ICU admission (45% vs 27%, p=0.02) and had prolonged length of stay (median 15 vs 10 days, p<0.01) than the CRKP-only group but mortality rates (18% vs 16%) were similar.

Conclusions

CRKP coinfection with another carbapenem-resistant pathogen adds significant morbidity and healthcare burden overall. Empiric therapy with reliable activity against both CRKP and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa may be prudent for at risk patients with pneumonia.

Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in Elderly Patients: Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, Risk Factors and Impact on Clinical Outcomes

Objective

The prevalence and clinical impact on mortality of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection are unclear in elderly patients. Here, we aimed to clarify the prevalence, the clinical manifestations, antimicrobial resistance, risk factors and outcomes of elderly inpatients with CRPA infection.

Methods

A retrospective study of 600 elderly inpatients infected with P. aeruginosa was conducted at Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine from January 1st 2018 to December 31st 2020. All 155 patients with CRPA infection were designated as a case group. Patients with carbapenem-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CSPA) were randomly selected from remaining 445 cases in a 1:1 ratio to case group as a control group.

Results

Of 600 P. aeruginosa isolates, the overall rates of CRPA, MDR PA (multidrug-resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were 25.8% (155), 22.3% (134), respectively. The rankings of the top five resistant rates of CRPA to tested antimicrobial drugs were imipenem (87.7%), meropenem (70.3%), ciprofloxacin (51.0%), levofloxacin (48.4%), cefoperazone (43.2%). Independent risk factors for patients with CRPA infection were cerebrovascular disease (OR = 3.517, P < 0.001), foley catheter (OR = 2.073, P = 0.018), length of hospital stay ≥ 14 days (OR = 1.980, P = 0.013), albumin < 35 g/L (OR = 2.049, P = 0.020), previous antibiotic exposure to carbapenems (OR = 7.022, P = 0.004), previous antibiotic exposure to third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins (OR = 12.649, P = 0.002). Of 155 patients with CRPA infection, the mortality rate was 16.8% (26/155). Independent risk factors for mortality were receiving mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.671, P = 0.007) and neutrophil percentage ≥ 80% (OR = 2.908, P = 0.024).

Conclusion

The study revealed high rates of CRPA, MDR PA among the hospitalized elderly patient with P. aeruginosa infection. The analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility emphasizes the necessity for antimicrobial stewardship and infection control in hospitals. These findings of risk factors are practical significant to identify patients at high risk for CRPA infection and mortality that may benefit from alternate empiric treatment.

Ceftazidime, Carbapenems, or Piperacillin-tazobactam as Single Definitive Therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infection: A Multisite Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The optimal antibiotic regimen for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia is controversial. Although β-lactam monotherapy is common, data to guide the choice between antibiotics are scarce. We aimed to compare ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive monotherapy.

METHODS

A multinational retrospective study (9 countries, 25 centers) including 767 hospitalized patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia treated with β-lactam monotherapy during 2009-2015. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate, including propensity-adjusted, analyses were conducted introducing monotherapy type as an independent variable.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was 37/213 (17.4%), 42/210 (20%), and 55/344 (16%) in the ceftazidime, carbapenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam groups, respectively. Type of monotherapy was not significantly associated with mortality in either univariate, multivariate, or propensity-adjusted analyses (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-2.46, for ceftazidime; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.67-2.51, for piperacillin-tazobactam, with carbapenems as reference in propensity adjusted multivariate analysis; 542 patients). No significant difference between antibiotics was demonstrated for clinical failure, microbiological failure, or adverse events. Isolation of P. aeruginosa with new resistance to antipseudomonal drugs was significantly more frequent with carbapenems (36/206 [17.5%]) versus ceftazidime (25/201 [12.4%]) and piperacillin-tazobactam (28/332 [8.4%] (P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference in mortality, clinical, and microbiological outcomes or adverse events was demonstrated between ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive treatment of P. aeruginosa bacteremia. Higher rates of resistant P. aeruginosa after patients were treated with carbapenems, along with the general preference for carbapenem-sparing regimens, suggests using ceftazidime or piperacillin-tazobactam for treating susceptible infection.

Evaluation of carbapenem use in a tertiary hospital: antimicrobial stewardship urgently needed

Background

China launched a 3-year rectification scheme for the clinical use of antibiotics in 2011, and a specific scheme for carbapenem use in 2017. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of government policies on carbapenem use, and their correlation with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA).

Methods

The study was divided into four stages: preintervention (2010), antimicrobial programme (2011-2013), post-antimicrobial programme (2014-2016) and carbapenem programme (2017). A point-score system was proposed for evaluating the rationality of carbapenem use, and evaluated based on the indications, microbial culture, single dose, interval, and duration. Any prescription without a global score of 10 points was judged as irrational. The trend was analyzed by regression analysis, and Spearman correlation analysis was used for testing the correlation.

Findings

The rate of rational use of carbapenems was 29.7% in 2010, and increased by 55.5, 45.2, and 51.5% during the subsequent three stages. The rationality declined slightly during the post-antimicrobial programme (2014-2016) while the consumption of carbapenems was markedly increased. These two parameters improved slightly in 2017. Moreover, the prevalence of CRPA was significantly negatively correlated with the rate of rational carbapenem use (Coefficient = - 0.553, P < 0.05), and not with the consumption of carbapenems (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The rational application of carbapenems was related to government policies in this study, with irrational carbapenem use possibly related to the development of CRPA. The current point-score system could be a useful tool for performing assessments.