Preoperative somatostatin analogues versus direct transsphenoidal surgery for newly-diagnosed acromegaly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the GRADE system

Acromegaly management in the Nordic countries: A Delphi consensus survey

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The therapeutic options include surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy. Several guidelines and recommendations on treatment algorithms and follow-up exist. However, not all recommendations are strictly evidence-based. To evaluate consensus on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries.

METHODS

A Delphi process was used to map the landscape of acromegaly management in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Iceland. An expert panel developed 37 statements on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly. Dedicated endocrinologists (n = 47) from the Nordic countries were invited to rate their extent of agreement with the statements, using a Likert-type scale (1-7). Consensus was defined as ≥80% of panelists rating their agreement as ≥5 or ≤3 on the Likert-type scale.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached in 41% (15/37) of the statements. Panelists agreed that pituitary surgery remains first line treatment. There was general agreement to recommend first-generation somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment after failed surgery and to consider repeat surgery. In addition, there was agreement to recommend combination therapy with first-generation SSA and pegvisomant as second- or third-line treatment. In more than 50% of the statements, consensus was not achieved. Considerable disagreement existed regarding pegvisomant monotherapy, and treatment with pasireotide and dopamine agonists.

CONCLUSION

This consensus exploration study on the management of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries revealed a relatively large degree of disagreement among experts, which mirrors the complexity of the disease and the shortage of evidence-based data.

Surgical and non-surgical interventions for primary and salvage treatment of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in adults

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma is a severe endocrine disease. Surgery is the currently recommended primary therapy for patients with GH-secreting tumours. However, non-surgical therapy (pharmacological therapy and radiation therapy) may be performed as primary therapy or may improve surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of surgical and non-surgical interventions for primary and salvage treatment of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search of all databases was 1 August 2022. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of more than 12 weeks' duration, reporting on surgical, pharmacological, radiation, and combination interventions for GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in any healthcare setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance, screened for inclusion, completed data extraction, and performed a risk of bias assessment. We assessed studies for overall certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We estimated treatment effects using random-effects meta-analysis. We expressed results as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, or in descriptive format when meta-analysis was not possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs that evaluated 445 adults with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Four studies reported that they included participants with macroadenomas, one study included a small number of participants with microadenomas. The remaining studies did not specify tumour subtypes. Studies evaluated surgical therapy alone, pharmacological therapy alone, or combination surgical and pharmacological therapy. Methodological quality varied, with many studies providing insufficient information to compare treatment strategies or accurately judge the risk of bias. We identified two main comparisons, surgery alone versus pharmacological therapy alone, and surgery alone versus pharmacological therapy and surgery combined. Surgical therapy alone versus pharmacological therapy alone Three studies with a total of 164 randomised participants investigated this comparison. Only one study narratively described hyperglycaemia as a disease-related complication. All three studies reported adverse events, yet only one study reported numbers separately for the intervention arms; none of the 11 participants were observed to develop gallbladder stones or sludge on ultrasonography following surgery, while five of 11 participants experienced any biliary problems following pharmacological therapy (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.47; 1 study, 22 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Health-related quality of life was reported to improve similarly in both intervention arms during follow-up. Surgery alone compared to pharmacological therapy alone may slightly increase the biochemical remission rate from 12 weeks to one year after intervention, but the evidence is very uncertain; 36/78 participants in the surgery-alone group versus 15/66 in the pharmacological therapy group showed biochemical remission. The need for additional surgery or non-surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent disease was described for single study arms only. Surgical therapy alone versus preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery Five studies with a total of 281 randomised participants provided data for this comparison. Preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery may have little to no effect on the disease-related complication of a difficult intubation (requiring postponement of surgery) compared to surgery alone, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.19 to 21.34; 1 study, 98 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Surgery alone may have little to no effect on (transient and persistent) adverse events when compared to preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery, but again, the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.03; 5 studies, 267 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Concerning biochemical remission, surgery alone compared to preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery may not increase remission rates up until 16 weeks after surgery; 23 of 134 participants in the surgery-alone group versus 51 of 133 in the preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery group showed biochemical remission. Furthermore, the very low-certainty evidence did not suggest benefit or detriment of preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery compared to surgery alone for the outcomes 'requiring additional surgery' (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.06; 1 study, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or 'non-surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent disease' (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.28; 2 studies, 100 participants; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies measured health-related quality of life. None of the eight included studies measured disease recurrence or socioeconomic effects. While three of the eight studies reported no deaths to have occurred, one study mentioned that overall, two participants had died within five years of the start of the study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Within the context of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, patient-relevant outcomes, such as disease-related complications, adverse events and disease recurrence were not, or only sparsely, reported. When reported, we found that surgery may have little or no effect on the outcomes compared to the comparator treatment. The current evidence is limited by the small number of included studies, as well as the unclear risk of bias in most studies. The high uncertainty of evidence significantly limits the applicability of our findings to clinical practice. Detailed reporting on the burden of recurrent disease is an important knowledge gap to be evaluated in future research studies. It is also crucial that future studies in this area are designed to report on outcomes by tumour subtype (that is, macroadenomas versus microadenomas) so that future subgroup analyses can be conducted. More rigorous and larger studies, powered to address these research questions, are required to assess the merits of neoadjuvant pharmacological therapy or first-line pharmacotherapy.

Long-term control of acromegaly after pituitary surgery in South-Eastern Norway

PURPOSE

Sustained cure of acromegaly can only be achieved by surgery. Most growth hormone (GH) secreting pituitary adenomas are macroadenomas (≥ 10 mm) at diagnosis, with reported surgical cure rates of approximately 50%. Long-term data on disease control rates after surgery are limited. Our aim was to estimate short- and long-term rates of biochemical control after pituitary surgery in acromegaly and identify predictive factors.

METHODS

Patients operated for GH-secreting pituitary adenomas between 2005-2020 were included from the local pituitary registry (n = 178). Disease activity and treatment data were recorded at one-year (short-term) and five-year (long-term) postoperative follow-up. Biochemical control was defined as insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) ≤ 1.2 × upper limit of normal value. Multivariate regression models were used to identify factors potentially predicting biochemical control.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients with acromegaly (median age at diagnosis 49 (IQR: 38-59) years, 46% women) were operated for a pituitary adenoma. Biochemical control was achieved by surgery in 53% at short-term and 41% at long-term follow-up, without additional treatment for acromegaly. Biochemical control rates by surgery were of same magnitude in paired samples (45% vs. 41%, p = 0.213) for short- and long-term follow-up, respectively. At short-term, 62% of patients with microadenomas and 51% with macroadenomas, achieved biochemical control. At long-term, the biochemical control rate was 58% for microadenomas and 37% for macroadenomas (p = 0.058). With adjunctive treatment, 82% achieved biochemical control at long-term. Baseline IGF-1 levels significantly predicted biochemical control by surgery at short-term (OR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), p = 0.011), but not at long-term (OR: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.57-1.00), p = 0.053).

CONCLUSION

In unselected patients with acromegaly, the long-term biochemical control rate remains modest. Our findings indicate a need to identify patients at an earlier stage and improve therapeutic methods and surgical outcomes.

A retrospective study of the role of hypercapnia in patients with acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is a multisystemic disease characterized by an excessive release of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common consequence of acromegaly, and hypercapnia is frequently observed in patients with acromegaly, OSA, and obesity. However, the effects of hypercapnia on acromegaly remain unknown. This study was designed to investigate whether there are differences in clinical symptoms, sleep variables, and biochemical remission after surgery for acromegaly in patients with OSA with or without hypercapnia.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted involving patients with acromegaly and OSA. The pharmacotherapy history for acromegaly before surgery, anthropometric measures, blood gas, sleep monitoring data, and biochemical assays of hypercapnic and eucapnic individuals were collected 1-2 weeks before surgery. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for failed postoperative biochemical remission.

RESULTS

In this study, 94 patients with OSA and acromegaly were included. Among them, 25 (26.6%) had hypercapnia. The hypercapnic group had higher body mass index (92% vs. 62.3%; p = 0.005) and poorer nocturnal hypoxemia index. No serological differences were found between the two groups. According to the post-surgery GH level, 52 patients (55.3%) reached biochemical remission. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR], 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-6.55), instead of hypercapnia (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.24-1.58), was associated with lower remission rates. Patients who received pharmacotherapy for acromegaly before surgery (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.79) and had higher thyroid-stimulating hormone levels (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88) were more likely to have biochemical remission after surgery. Multivariate analysis further showed that only diabetes mellitus (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.15-9.46) and preoperative pharmacotherapy (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83) remained significant. Hypercapnia, hormone levels, and sleep indicators had no effect on biochemical remission after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-center evidence shows that hypercapnia alone may not be a risk factor for lower biochemical remission rates. Correcting hypercapnia does not appear to be required before surgery. More evidence is needed to further support this conclusion.

Diagnosis and Management of Pituitary Adenomas: A Review

Importance

Pituitary adenomas are neoplasms of the pituitary adenohypophyseal cell lineage and include functioning tumors, characterized by the secretion of pituitary hormones, and nonfunctioning tumors. Clinically evident pituitary adenomas occur in approximately 1 in 1100 persons.

Observations

Pituitary adenomas are classified as either macroadenomas (≥10 mm) (48% of tumors) or microadenomas (<10 mm). Macroadenomas may cause mass effect, such as visual field defects, headache, and/or hypopituitarism, which occur in about 18% to 78%, 17% to 75%, and 34% to 89% of patients, respectively. Thirty percent of pituitary adenomas are nonfunctioning adenomas, which do not produce hormones. Functioning tumors are those that produce an excess of normally produced hormones and include prolactinomas, somatotropinomas, corticotropinomas, and thyrotropinomas, which produce prolactin, growth hormone, corticotropin, and thyrotropin, respectively. Approximately 53% of pituitary adenomas are prolactinomas, which can cause hypogonadism, infertility, and/or galactorrhea. Twelve percent are somatotropinomas, which cause acromegaly in adults and gigantism in children, and 4% are corticotropinomas, which secrete corticotropin autonomously, resulting in hypercortisolemia and Cushing disease. All patients with pituitary tumors require endocrine evaluation for hormone hypersecretion. Patients with macroadenomas additionally require evaluation for hypopituitarism, and patients with tumors compressing the optic chiasm should be referred to an ophthalmologist for formal visual field testing. For those requiring treatment, first-line therapy is usually transsphenoidal pituitary surgery, except for prolactinomas, for which medical therapy, either bromocriptine or cabergoline, is usually first line.

Conclusions and Relevance

Clinically manifest pituitary adenomas affect approximately 1 in 1100 people and can be complicated by syndromes of hormone excess as well as visual field defects and hypopituitarism from mass effect in larger tumors. First-line therapy for prolactinomas consists of bromocriptine or cabergoline, and transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is first-line therapy for other pituitary adenomas requiring treatment.

Trends in incidence and mortality risk for acromegaly in Norway: a cohort study

PURPOSE

Recent data have shown a decreasing overall mortality in acromegaly over the last decades. However, cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality still appear to be increased. Our aim was to obtain updated epidemiological data from Norway in a clinically well-defined cohort with complete register-based follow-up.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with acromegaly from South-Eastern Norway between 1999-2019 (n = 262) and age and sex matched population controls (1:100) were included (n = 26,200). Mortality and cancer data were obtained from the Norwegian Cause of Death and Cancer Registry. Mortality and cancer incidence were compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression; we report hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 48.0 years (interquartile range (IQR): 37.6-58.0). Mean annual acromegaly incidence rate was 4.7 (95% CI 4.2-5.3) cases/10⁶ person-years, and the point prevalence (2019) was 83 (95% CI 72.6-93.5) cases/10⁶ persons. Overall mortality was not increased in acromegaly, HR 0.8 (95% CI 0.5-1.4), cancer-specific and cardiovascular-specific mortality was also not increased (HR: 0.7 (95% CI 0.3-1.8) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.3-2.5) respectively). The HR for all cancers was 1.45 (1.0-2.1; p = 0.052).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort study, covering the period 1999-2019, patients were treated with individualized multimodal management. Mortality was not increased compared to the general population and comparable with recent registry studies from the Nordic countries and Europe. Overall cancer risk was slightly, but not significantly increased in the patients.

Preoperative Medical Treatment for Patient with Acromegaly: yes or no?

Transsphenoidal surgery is the first-line treatment for acromegaly. However, several factors can modify surgical remission rates, such as the initial hormone levels, the size and invasiveness of the tumor, and the degree of experience of the surgeon. Physicians treating patients with acromegaly should thus consider how to improve surgical remission rates. As stated in recent guidelines, the major point is to consider that any patient with acromegaly should be referred to an expert neurosurgeon to maximize the chances of surgical sure. The benefits of presurgical medical treatment, mainly using somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), given 3 to 6 months before surgery, remain controversial. By normalizing growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, SRLs may improve the overall condition of the patient, thus decreasing anesthetic and surgical complications. By decreasing the tumor size and modifying the consistency of the tumor, SRLs might also make surgical excision easier. This is however theoretical as published data are contradictory on both points, and only limited data support the use of a systematical presurgical medical treatment. The aim of this review is to analyze the potential benefits and pitfalls of using presurgical medical treatment in acromegaly in view of the contradictory literature data. We also attempt to determine the profile of patients who might most benefit from this presurgical medical treatment approach as an individualized therapeutic management of acromegaly.

Anesthetic management during transsphenoidal pituitary surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pituitary adenoma resections comprise a large proportion of intracranial tumor surgeries. This patient population is medically and physiologically complex and requires careful perioperative planning and management on the part of the anesthesiologist. This review will summarize anesthetic considerations for pre, intra, and postoperative management of patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

An endoscopic approach is favored for patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Hemodynamic monitoring is important to maintain cerebral perfusion and avoid risk of bleeding; however, 'controlled' hypotension may have adverse effects. Multimodal analgesia is effective for the management of postoperative pain and may reduce the risk of postoperative complications, including respiratory depression and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

SUMMARY

Transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is a preferred approach for the surgical management of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas with symptoms of mass effect and functioning adenomas that cannot be otherwise managed medically. Understanding tumor pathologies and systemic effects are essential for preoperative planning and providing safe anesthetic care during the perioperative period.

The Dose of Somatostatin Analogues during Pre-Surgical Treatment Is a Key Factor to Achieve Surgical Remission in Acromegaly

Purpose: to determine whether pre-surgical treatment using long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs) may improve surgical outcomes in acromegaly. Methods: retrospective study of 48 patients with acromegaly operated by endoscopic transsphenoidal approach and for first time. Surgical remission was evaluated based on the 2010 criteria. Results: most patients, 83.3% (n = 40), harbored macroadenomas and 31.3% (n = 15) invasive pituitary adenomas. In this case, 14 patients were treated with lanreotide LAR and 6 with octreotide LAR, median monthly doses of 97.5 [range 60–120] and 20 [range 20–30] mg, respectively, for at least 3 months preoperatively. Presurgical variables were comparable between pre-treated and untreated patients (p > 0.05). Surgical remission was more frequent in those pre-treated with monthly doses ≥90 mg of lanreotide or ≥30 mg of octreotide than in untreated or pre-treated with lower doses (OR = 4.64, p = 0.025). However, no differences were found between pre-treated and untreated patients when lower doses were included or between those treated for longer than 6 months compared to those untreated or pre-treated for shorter than 6 months. Similarly, no differences were found either in terms of surgical or endocrine complications (OR = 0.65, p = 0.570), independently of the doses and the duration of SSA treatment (p > 0.05). Conclusions: the dose of SSAs is a key factor during pre-surgical treatment, since the beneficial effects in surgical remission were observed with monthly doses equal or higher than 90 mg of lanreotide and 30 mg of octreotide, but not with lower doses.

Predictors for Remission after Transsphenoidal Surgery in Acromegaly: A Dutch Multicenter Study

CONTEXT

Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is the primary treatment of choice in acromegaly. It is important to identify patients in whom surgical cure is not attainable at an early stage, both to inform patients on expected treatment outcome and to select those who are more likely to need additional therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors for remission after TSS in acromegaly.

METHODS

Large multicenter study with retrospective data collection from 3 tertiary neurosurgical referral centers in The Netherlands. We analyzed clinical data since 2000 from 3 cohorts (Groningen, Nijmegen, and Rotterdam, total n = 282). Multivariate regression models were used to identify predictors of early biochemical remission (12 weeks to 1 year postoperatively) according to the 2010 consensus criteria, long-term remission (age- and sex-normalized insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1] and the absence of postoperative treatment until last follow-up), and relative IGF-1 and growth hormone [GH] reduction.

RESULTS

A larger maximum tumor diameter (odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.96, P ≤ .0001) was associated with a lower chance of early biochemical remission. A larger maximum tumor diameter (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.97, P = .0022) and a higher random GH concentration at diagnosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, P = .0053) were associated with a lower chance of long-term remission.

CONCLUSION

Maximum tumor diameter and random GH concentration at diagnosis are the best predictors for remission after TSS in acromegaly.

Multidisciplinary protocol of preoperative and surgical management of patients with pituitary tumors candidates to pituitary surgery

The optimal planning of preoperative diagnosis, management and treatment of pituitary tumors (PT) candidates to pituitary surgery (PS) requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a team of endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, ENT, neuro-ophthalmologists and neuroradiologists with experience in pituitary diseases. Such teams improve surgical results, minimize complications and facilitate their correct treatment if occurring, and optimize the hormonal, ophthalmological and radiological preoperative and follow-up evaluation. We have developed a clinical practice protocol for patients with PT who are candidates to PS based on the most recent national and international guidelines and the relevant literature regarding PT published in the last years. The protocol has been elaborated by a multidisciplinary team of a Spanish Pituitary Tumor Center of Excellence (PTCE) that includes at least one neurosurgeon, ENT, neuroradiologist, neuro-ophthalmologist, endocrine pathologist and endocrinologist specialized in pituitary diseases. We elaborated this guideline with the aim of sharing our experience with other centers involved in the perioperative and surgical management of PT thereby facilitating the management of patients undergoing PS.

Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus

The 13th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was held in November 2019 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and comprised acromegaly experts including endocrinologists and neurosurgeons who considered optimal approaches for multidisciplinary acromegaly management. Focused discussions reviewed techniques, results, and side effects of surgery, radiotherapy, and medical therapy, and how advances in technology and novel techniques have changed the way these modalities are used alone or in combination. Effects of treatment on patient outcomes were considered, along with strategies for optimizing and personalizing therapeutic approaches. Expert consensus recommendations emphasize how best to implement available treatment options as part of a multidisciplinary approach at Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence.

Development and assessment of machine learning algorithms for predicting remission after transsphenoidal surgery among patients with acromegaly

PURPOSE

Preoperative prediction of transsphenoidal surgical (TSS) response is important for determining individual treatment strategies for acromegaly. There is currently no accurate predictive model for TSS response for acromegaly. The current study sought to develop and validate machine learning (ML)-based models for preoperative prediction of TSS response for acromegaly.

METHODS

Six hundred sixty-eight patients with acromegaly were enrolled and divided into training (n = 534) and text datasets (n = 134) in this retrospective, data mining and ML study. The forward search algorithm was used to select features, and six ML algorithms were applied to construct TSS response prediction models. The performance of these ML models was validated using receiver operating characteristics analysis. Model calibration, discrimination ability, and clinical usefulness were also assessed.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-nine (52.2%) patients achieved postoperative remission criteria and exhibited good TSS response. A univariate analysis was conducted and eight features, including age, hypertension, ophthalmic disorders, GH, IGF-1, nadir GH, maximal tumor diameter, and Knosp grade, were significantly associated with the TSS response in patients with acromegaly. After feature selection, the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), which was constructed with the eight significant features showed the best favorable discriminatory ability both the training (AUC = 0.8555) and validation (AUC = 0.8178) cohorts. The GBDT model showed good discrimination ability and calibration, with the highest levels of accuracy and specificity, and provided better estimates of TTS responses of patients with acromegaly compared with using only the Knosp grade. Decision curve analysis confirmed that the model was clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

ML-based models could aid neurosurgeons in the preoperative prediction of TTS response for patients with acromegaly, and could contribute to determining individual treatment strategies.

Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME) and Italian AACE Chapter Position Statement for Clinical Practice: Acromegaly - Part 2: Therapeutic Issues

Any newly diagnosed patient should be referred to a multidisciplinary team experienced in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. The therapeutic management of acromegaly always requires a personalized strategy. Normal age-matched IGF-I values are the treatment goal. Transsphenoidal surgery by an expert neurosurgeon is the primary treatment modality for most patients, especially if there are neurological complications. In patients with poor clinical conditions or who refuse surgery, primary medical treatment should be offered, firstly with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). In patients who do not reach hormonal targets with first-generation depot SSAs, a second pharmacological option with pasireotide LAR or pegvisomant (alone or combined with SSA) should be offered. Irradiation could be proposed to patients with surgical remnants who would like to be free from long-term medical therapies or those with persistent disease activity or tumor growth despite surgery or medical therapy. Since the therapeutic tools available enable therapeutic targets to be achieved in most cases, the challenge is to focus more on the quality of life.

Preoperative Somatostatin Analogues in Patients with Newly-diagnosed Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

Biochemical remission after transsphenoidal surgery is still unsatisfied in acromegaly patients with macroadenomas, especially with invasive macroadenomas. Concerning the impact of preoperative somatostatin analogues (SSAs) on surgical outcomes, previous studies with limited cases reported conflicting results. To assess current evidence of preoperative medical treatment, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. A literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Five randomized controlled trials (RCT) and seven non-RCT comparative studies were included. These studies mainly focused on pituitary macroadenomas though a small number of microadenoma cases were included. For safety, preoperative SSAs were not associated with elevated risks of postoperative complications. With respect to efficacy, the short-term cure rate was improved by preoperative SSAs, but the long-term cure rate showed no significant improvement. For invasive macroadenomas, the short-term cure rate was also improved, but the long-term results were not evaluable in clinical practice because adjuvant therapy was generally required. In conclusion, preoperative SSAs are safe in patients with acromegaly, and the favorable impact on surgical results is restricted to the short-term cure rate in macroadenomas and invasive macroadenomas. Further well-designed RCTs to examine long-term results are awaited to update the finding of this meta-analysis.

The effects of pre-operative somatostatin analogue therapy on treatment cost and remission in acromegaly

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of preoperative somatostatin analogue (SSA) treatment on the annual cost of all acromegaly treatment modalities and on remission rates.

METHODS

The medical records of 135 patients with acromegaly who were followed at endocrinology clinic of Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty for at least 2 years after surgery between 2009 and 2016 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 50.9 ± 25.7 months. Early remission was defined according to 3rd month values in patients who didn't achieve remission, and 6th month values in patients who achieved remission at the 3rd month after surgery. The early and late remission rates of the entire study population were 40% and 80.7%, respectively. The early remission of the preoperative SSA-treated group (61.5%) was significantly higher than SSA-untreated group (31.2%) (p = 0.002). The early remission of the preoperative SSA-treated patients with macroadenomas (52.2%) was also significantly higher than the SSA-untreated group (23.5%) (p = 0.02). In the subgroup analysis; this difference was much more pronounced in invasive macroadenomas (p = 0.002). There were no differences between the groups in terms of late remission.The median annual cost of all acromegaly treatment modalities in study population was €3788.4; the cost for macroadenomas was significantly higher than for microadenomas (€4125.0 vs. €3226.5, respectively; p = 0.03). Preoperative SSA use in both microadenomas and macroadenomas didn't alter the cost of treatment. The increase in the duration of preoperative medical treatment had no effect on early or late remissions (p = 0.09; p = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative medical treatment had no effect on the costs of acromegaly treatment. There was a benefical effect of pre-operative SSA use on early remission in patients with macroadenomas; however, this effect didn't persist long term.

Effects of somatostatin analog treatment on cardiovascular parameters in patients with acromegaly: A systematic review

Background:

There is a belief that in patients with acromegaly, first-generation somatostatin analogs (SSAs) might improve cardiovascular (CV) structure and function. However, most published clinical trials involved only a few patients and their results are rather variable. We aimed to conduct a systematic review on available studies on the impact of these drugs on CV parameters.

Materials and Methods:

A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBase, Cochrane, and ISI Web of Science for citations published until April 30 2018 to identify studies on our objective that considered changes in CV parameters. For this search, we established a Boolean search strategy using keywords related to “acromegaly,” “Somatostatin analog,” and “cardiovascular diseases and parameters.” All study types except for case reports or conference abstracts were included. Twenty-four studies (n = 558) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for final analysis.

Results:

In 12 studies (n = 350), decrease in heart rate (HR) and in 4 studies (n = 128), decrease in blood pressure (BP) was significant. In 15 studies (n = 320), left ventricular mass index (LVMi) changes were significant. In 9 studies (n = 202), the early diastole to peak velocity flow in late diastole (E/A ratio) was evaluated, and in 5 of them (n = 141), the improvement was significant. Eighteen studies (n = 366) examined changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 5 of which (n = 171) reported that these changes were significant. Decrease of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was reported in only 2 studies (n = 27).

Conclusion:

We found that first-generation SSAs have a beneficial effect on cardiac parameters such as HR and LVMi. For other parameters such as LVEF, BP, LV diameter, and E/A ratio, we were not able to draw a firm conclusion.

Long-Term Effects of Intracapsular Debulking and Adjuvant Somatostatin Analogs for Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Macroadenoma: 10 Years of Experience in a Single Institute

OBJECTIVE

Long-term effects of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal intracapsular debulking and adjuvant somatostatin analogs (SSAs) were evaluated in patients with growth hormone- (GH) secreting pituitary macroadenomas.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 45 patients with acromegalic macroadenoma who underwent endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal intracapsular debulking and received adjuvant SSAs (octreotide) between 2006 and 2015 who had >1 year of follow-up. To evaluate the predictive factors for 1 year and long-term biochemical outcomes, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Biochemical remission was achieved in 1 year in 20 of the 45 (44.4%) patients, and in 31 of the 45 patients after long-term adjuvant SSA treatment. Tumor control was achieved in 43 of the 45 (93.3%) patients. The univariate analysis showed age (≥55 years), tumor size (diameter ≤1.5 cm), premedication GH levels (≤2.8 ng/mL), premedication insulin-like growth factor 1 levels (≤2-fold of upper limit of normal range), cavernous sinus invasion (Knops grades 2, 3, and 4), and near-total tumor resection were associated with long-term outcomes. The multivariate analysis showed near-total resection was a significant predictor for long-term outcomes (P = 0.019). There were no new pituitary dysfunctions. The observed complications included one case of cerebrospinal fluid leakage and one case of epistaxis requiring intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracapsular debulking and adjuvant SSAs are a safe and viable treatment for patients with GH secreting pituitary macroadenoma to achieve biochemical remission and tumor control. Although adjuvant SSA treatment enhances residual tumor control, cavernous sinus invasion impedes the remission of endocrine tumors.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST₂ and SST₅ receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST₂ is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.

A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes

The 11th Acromegaly Consensus Conference in April 2017 was convened to update recommendations on therapeutic outcomes for patients with acromegaly. Consensus guidelines on the medical management of acromegaly were last published in 2014; since then, new pharmacological agents have been developed and new approaches to treatment sequencing have been considered. Thirty-seven experts in the management of patients with acromegaly reviewed the current literature and assessed changes in drug approvals, clinical practice standards and clinical opinion. They considered current treatment outcome goals with a focus on the impact of current and emerging somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists and dopamine agonists on biochemical, clinical, tumour mass and surgical outcomes. The participants discussed factors that would determine pharmacological choices as well as the proposed place of each agent in the guidelines. We present consensus recommendations highlighting how acromegaly management could be optimized in clinical practice.

Medical Treatments for Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly results from the hypersecretion of growth hormone. Because of the low incidence rates of this disease worldwide, few clinical trials evaluating drug treatments have been conducted.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct the first network meta-analysis simultaneously comparing all available drugs used in acromegaly treatment so as to provide more robust evidence in this field.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane Collaboration recommendations (PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD42017059880). The electronic searches were conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing any drug for the treatment of acromegaly head-to-head or versus placebo were included. Outcomes concerning the efficacy and safety of treatments were evaluated. The statistical analyses were performed using Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16.8 (drugis.org, Groningen, The Netherlands).

RESULTS

The initial search retrieved 2059 articles. Of these, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in a qualitative analysis and 7 in a quantitative analysis. The network meta-analysis for the efficacy outcome (number of patients achieving insulinlike growth factor 1 control) showed that pegvisomant and lanreotide autogel were statistically superior to placebo (odds ratio [95% credible interval] 0.06 [0.00-0.55] and 0.09 [0.01-0.88]). No further differences were found. The probability rank indicated that pegvisomant and pasireotide have the highest probabilities (33% and 34%, respectively) of being the best therapeutic options. No major side effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegvisomant is still a good option for acromegaly treatment, but pasireotide seems to be a promising alternative. Nevertheless, other important key factors such as drug costs and effectiveness (real-world results) should be taken into account when selecting acromegaly treatment.

Prolonged preoperative treatment of acromegaly with Somatostatin analogs may improve surgical outcome in patients with invasive pituitary macroadenoma (Knosp grades 1-3): a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate preoperative somatostatin analogs (SSAs) treatment on the surgical outcome in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

An analysis of 358 patients with acromegaly was conducted. The preoperative medical therapy group (81 patients) received SSA treatment for at least 3 months prior to surgery, while the primary surgery group (277 patients) underwent transsphenoidal surgery directly. Follow-up duration was ≥3 months. Tumor invasion was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and classified according to the Knosp grading system.

RESULTS

Most patients were diagnosed with macroadenoma. Among all patients (Knosp grades 0-4), preoperative SSA therapy did not significantly improve the curative effect of surgery, according to the levels of growth hormone (GH) and/or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) markers. In patients with macroadenoma (Knosp grades 1-3), the remission rates were significantly higher in the SSA group compared to the surgery group when considering GH (56.4% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.048) and IGF-1 (43.2% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.004). In the preoperative medical therapy group, long-term use of SSAs (>6 months) led to higher remission rates (GH, 72.2% vs. 51.0%; and IGF-1, 61.1% vs. 29.8%; P = 0.12 and 0.02, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term preoperative SSAs treatment may improve the surgical curative rate in acromegalic patients with invasive macroadenomas (Knosp grades 1-3).

Efficacy of transsphenoidal surgery in achieving biochemical cure of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas among patients with cavernous sinus invasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in adults can result in severe craniofacial disfigurement and potentially fatal medical complications. Surgical resection leading to remission of the disease is dependent on complete surgical resection of the tumor. Lesions that invade the cavernous sinus may not be safely accessible via an endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), and the rates of biochemical remission of patients with residual disease vary widely in the literature. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the prevalence of biochemical remission after TSS among patients with growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas with and without cavernous sinus invasion.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant publications. Fourteen studies with 972 patients with biochemically confirmed growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The overall remission prevalence under a fixed-effect model was 47.6% (95% CI = 40.8-54.4%) for patients with invasive macroadenomas (I² = 74.6%, p < 0.01); 76.4% (95% CI = 72.2-80.1%) for patients with non-invasive macroadenomas (I² = 59.6%, p = 0.03); and 74.2% (95% CI = 66.3-80.7%) for patients with non-invasive microadenomas (I² = 36.4, p = 0.10). The significant difference among the three groups resulted from the difference between patients with or without cavernous sinus invasion (p = 0.01) and not from the size of adenomas among those without cavernous sinus invasion (p = 0.66).

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of biochemical remission in patients with cavernous sinus invasion was lower than in patients without cavernous sinus invasion after TSS for acromegaly.

Pros and cons in endocrine practice: pre-surgical treatment with somatostatin analogues in acromegaly

The aim of this commentary is to balance the pros and cons for pre-surgical SSA treatment in a modern perspective ending up with a pragmatic recommendation for treatment based on the current evidence and expertise of the authors. Even though prospective and randomized studies in this particular area are hampered by obvious limitations, the interpretation of the four published trials has in general been in favor of pre-treatment with SSA, showing a better outcome following surgery. However, major drawbacks of these studies, such as non-optimal diagnostic criteria for cure, potential selection bias, and timing of the postoperative evaluation in SSA pre-treated patients, limit their overall interpretation. Three matched-controlled studies showed remarkably similar results with no apparent beneficial effect of SSA pre-treatment on surgical outcome. Both prospective, randomized studies and retrospective studies did not find any significant difference in the rate of endocrine and non-endocrine complications related to surgery, despite the beneficial clinical effects of SSA treatment in most acromegalic patients. The newly diagnosed patient with acromegaly should be carefully evaluated in the trans-disciplinary neuroendocrine team and treatment individualized accordingly. The issue of SSA pre-treatment to improve surgical outcome is yet to be settled and further methodologically sound studies are probably necessary to clarify this point.

Evidence-based guidelines in acromegaly: implications on the clinic

Acromegaly is a rare disease with many challenges in its management. In order to address these challenges, many clinical practice guidelines were recently published. They were based on the literature evidence, aiming at guiding primary care physicians, general endocrinologists and neuroendocrinologists. The majority of these guidelines were developed following the GRADE system that classifies the recommendations according to strength (weak or strong) and quality of the evidence that supports them. In this review, we discuss how the evidence-based guidelines are developed, how to interpret the different strengths of recommendations and discuss the clinical implications of the evidence-based guidelines in acromegaly, pointing its utility and limitations on the diagnosis, management of comorbidities and in the disease treatment.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of preoperative treatment of acromegaly with somatostatin analogue on surgical outcome

CONTEXT

There is no uniform standard of care for acromegaly. Due to the high costs involved, steps must be taken to ensure the cost-effective delivery of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Taking the results of an earlier meta-analysis as a starting point, this study aims to determine whether treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogue (SSA) prior to surgery improves the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of acromegaly.

METHODS

The results are presented as an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) immediately after surgery, for the following year and over the next four decades. The cure rates percentage (95% CI) for the three randomized prospective controlled trials were 44.4% (34.2-54.7) and 18.2% (10.1-26.3) for preoperative treated and untreated patients respectively. The cost of pharmacological treatments was based on the number of units prescribed, dose and length of treatment.

RESULTS

The mean (95% CI) ICER immediately after surgery was €17,548 (12,007-33,250). In terms of the postoperative SSA treatment, the ICER changes from positive to negative before two years after surgery. One decade after surgery the ICER per patient/year was €-9973 (-18,798; -6752) for postoperative SSA treatment and €-31,733 (-59,812; -21,483) in the case of postoperative pegvisomant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In centres without optimal surgical results, preoperative treatment of GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas with SSA not only shows a significant improvement in the surgical results, but is also highly cost-effective, with an ICER per patient/year one decade after surgery, of between €-9973 (-18,798; -6752) and €-31,733 (-59,812; -21,483) for SSA and pegvisomant respectively.

60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: Acromegaly

Acromegaly (ACM) is a chronic, progressive disorder caused by the persistent hypersecretion of GH, in the vast majority of cases secreted by a pituitary adenoma. The consequent increase in IGF1 (a GH-induced liver protein) is responsible for most clinical features and for the systemic complications associated with increased mortality. The clinical diagnosis, based on symptoms related to GH excess or the presence of a pituitary mass, is often delayed many years because of the slow progression of the disease. Initial testing relies on measuring the serum IGF1 concentration. The oral glucose tolerance test with concomitant GH measurement is the gold-standard diagnostic test. The therapeutic options for ACM are surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy (RT). The outcome of surgery is very good for microadenomas (80-90% cure rate), but at least half of the macroadenomas (most frequently encountered in ACM patients) are not cured surgically. Somatostatin analogs are mainly indicated after surgical failure. Currently their routine use as primary therapy is not recommended. Dopamine agonists are useful in a minority of cases. Pegvisomant is indicated for patients refractory to surgery and other medical treatments. RT is employed sparingly, in cases of persistent disease activity despite other treatments, due to its long-term side effects. With complex, combined treatment, at least three-quarters of the cases are controlled according to current criteria. With proper control of the disease, the specific complications are partially improved and the mortality rate is close to that of the background population.