Growth hormone treatment in aged patients with comorbidities: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Hormonal substitution with growth hormone in aged patients remains a debated research topic and is rarely initiated in clinical practice. This reluctance may originate from concerns about adverse effects and the uncritical use as an anti-aging agent. Nevertheless, beneficial effects for selected patients suffering from certain acute and chronic illnesses could justify its use at an advanced age. This systematic review analyzes randomized controlled studies of GH interventions in older patients with different comorbidities to assess both, beneficial and harmful effects.

DESIGN

A systematic search strategy was implemented to identify relevant studies from PubMed, MEDLINE, and The Cochrane Library.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

participants aged over 65 years, randomized controlled trials involving human growth hormone (GH) and presence of at least one additional comorbidity independent of a flawed somatotropic axis.

RESULTS

The eight eligible studies encompassed various comorbidities including osteoporosis, frailty, chronic heart failure, hip fracture, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and hemodialysis. Outcomes varied, including changes in body composition, physical performance, strength, bone mineral density, cardiovascular parameters, quality of life and housing situation. Study protocols differed greatly in GH application frequency (daily, 2nd day or 3×/week), doses (0.41 mg-2.6 mg; mean 1.3 mg per 60 kg patient) and duration (1-12 months; mean 7 months). Mild dose-related side effects were reported, alongside noticeable positive impacts particularly on body composition, functionality, and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Despite limited evidence, GH treatment might offer diverse benefits with few adverse effects. Further research with IGF-I dependent indication and clear outcomes, incorporating IGF-I dependent GH titration in older adults is warranted.

Safety and Effectiveness of a Biosimilar Recombinant Human Growth Hormone in Children Requiring Growth Hormone Treatment: Analysis of Final Data from PATRO Children, an International, Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

Purpose

Omnitrope® (somatropin) was approved as a biosimilar recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in 2006. Here, we report final data from the PAtients TReated with Omnitrope® (PATRO) Children study, a post-marketing surveillance study designed to monitor the long-term safety and effectiveness of this treatment in pediatric patients.

Methods

The study population included all pediatric patients treated with Omnitrope® (biosimilar rhGH), administered via daily injection, in routine clinical practice. The primary objective was to assess long-term safety, with effectiveness assessed as a secondary objective.

Results

In total, 7359 patients were enrolled and treated in the PATRO Children study; 86.0% were treatment-naïve at baseline. Growth hormone deficiency was the most frequent indication (57.9%), followed by patients born small for gestational age (SGA; 26.6%). The mean (SD) duration of exposure to biosimilar rhGH was 3.66 years (2.39). A total of 16,628 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3981 (54.1%) patients, most of which were mild/moderate. AEs suspected to be treatment related occurred in 8.3% of patients, most frequently headache (1.6%), injection-site pain (1.1%), or injection-site hematoma (1.1%). The incidence rate (IR) of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 0.11 per 1000 person-years (PY) across all patients, and 0.13 per 1000 PY in patients born SGA. The IR of newly diagnosed primary malignancies was 0.22 per 1000 PY across all patients. In the 6589 patients included in the effectiveness population, a sustained catch-up growth was observed across all indications. After 5 years of treatment, height SDS increased from baseline by a median (range) of +1.79 (-3.7 to 6.2) in treatment-naïve patients and +0.73 (-1.4 to 3.7) in pretreated patients.

Conclusion

This final analysis of the PATRO Children study indicates that biosimilar rhGH is well tolerated and effective in real-world clinical practice. These data are consistent with the well-characterized safety profile of rhGH treatment in pediatric patients.

[Growth hormone - 30 years of clinical practice: past, present, future]

The recombinant technologies era, which began in the second half of the XX century, made it possible to produce recombinant growth hormone (rGH) necessary for the treatment of stunting of various genesis. The time of practically unlimited possibilities of rGH production has come, which served as a stimulus for studying the efficacy and safety of rGH application, searching for optimal ways of its use and dosing regimes. Many years of experience in the use of somatropin in clinical practice allowed us to obtain data on its effectiveness primarily in somatotropic insufficiency in children, to study its effect on the functional state of various organs and systems, and to expand the indications for the use of RGR.

Cerebrovascular Abnormalities in Adults Born SGA at 12 Years After Growth Hormone Cessation Compared to Controls

CONTEXT

Increased cerebrovascular morbidity was reported in adults born small for gestational age (SGA) who were treated with growth hormone (GH) during childhood compared to the general population. However, previous studies did not have an appropriate control group, which is a major limitation.

OBJECTIVE

To study cerebrovascular abnormalities (aneurysms, previous intracerebral hemorrhages and microbleeds) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in adults born SGA at 12 years after cessation of childhood GH treatment (SGA-GH) compared to appropriate controls.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective study, brain MRIs were performed between May 2016 and December 2020 on a 3T MRI system. MRI images were scored by 2 neuroradiologists who were blinded to patient groupings. Participants included adults born SGA previously treated with GH and 3 untreated control groups: adults born SGA with persistent short stature (SGA-S), adults born SGA with spontaneous catch-up growth to a normal height (SGA-CU) and adults born appropriate for gestational age with a normal height (AGA). The intervention was long-term GH treatment during childhood and the main outcome measure was cerebrovascular abnormalities.

RESULTS

A total of 301 adults were investigated. Aneurysms were found in 6 adults: 3 (3.6%) SGA-GH, 1 (2.9%) SGA-S and 2 (2.2%) AGA adults, without differences between SGA-GH adults and the controls. Previous intracerebral hemorrhages were only found in 2 SGA-S adults (4.8%). Microbleeds were found in 17 adults: 4 (4.3%) SGA-GH, 4 (9.5%) SGA-S, 3 (4.3%) SGA-CU and 6 (6.3%) AGA adults, without differences between SGA-GH adults and the controls.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that SGA-GH adults at 12 years after GH cessation have no increased prevalence of cerebrovascular abnormalities compared to appropriate controls. Further research is needed to confirm our findings.

Safety of long-term use of daily and long-acting growth hormone in growth hormone-deficient adults on cancer risk

Daily injections of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) have been used in clinical practice for almost four decades as a replacement therapy in adult patients with GH deficiency (GHD). Long-term adherence to daily injections of rhGH is a clinical concern that may result in reduced therapeutic efficacy, and long-acting GH (LAGH) formulations have been developed in an attempt of overcoming this problem. Long-term safety issues of rhGH are the other side of the coin that has been carefully monitored over the years, particularly related to the proliferative actions of GH that could increase the risk of tumor recurrence or induce the development of new benign and malignant tumors. In this review, we present what is currently known about the cancer risk in GHD adults treated with daily rhGH injections and we discuss the major concerns and responses needed from future surveillance studies regarding the safety of LAGH preparations.

Efficacy and Safety of Pegvisomant in the Treatment of Acromegaly

Pegvisomant, the first and currently only clinically available growth hormone receptor antagonist, is an effective therapeutic option for the medical treatment of acromegaly, a rare disorder characterized by excessive growth hormone secretion. With now over 20 years of real world experience, its safety and efficacy is well-established. However, several aspects of its clinical use are still controversially discussed. The high cost of pegvisomant has limited its use in several countries, and recent studies have reported a lower efficacy than the initial clinical trials. A reported increase in tumor volume under therapy varies between studies and has been attributed to either actual growth or re-expansion after cessation of somatostatin receptor ligand therapy. Furthermore, different combinations of pegvisomant and other therapeutic agents aiming at reduction of acromegaly disease activity have been proposed to increase or retain effectiveness while lowering side effects and cost. This review aims to assess current clinical data on the safety and efficacy of pegvisomant while also addressing controversies surrounding its use.

Growth hormone replacement in adults with cured acromegaly: Efficacy and safety

Between 2% and 60% of patients with cured acromegaly may eventually develop growth hormone deficiency. In adults, growth hormone deficiency is associated with abnormal body composition, decreased exercise capacity and quality of life, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and increased cardiovascular risk. Similar to patients with other sellar lesions, the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults with cured acromegaly generally requires stimulation testing, with the exception of patients with very low serum insulin-like growth factor I levels and multiple additional pituitary hormone deficiencies. In adults with cured acromegaly, growth hormone replacement may have beneficial effects on body adiposity, muscle endurance, serum lipids and quality of life. Growth hormone replacement is generally well-tolerated. Arthralgias, edema, carpal tunnel syndrome and hyperglycemia may occur in patients with cured acromegaly, as is true of patients with growth hormone deficiency of other etiologies. However, there is evidence of increased cardiovascular risk in some studies of growth hormone replacement in adults with cured acromegaly. More studies are needed to fully establish the beneficial effects and elucidate the risks of growth hormone replacement in adults with cured acromegaly. Until then, growth hormone replacement can be considered in these patients on a case-by-case basis.

Impact of long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy in adult growth hormone deficiency: Comparison between adolescent, adult, and elderly patients

The predominant features of the adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) syndrome may vary between patients of different age and age of onset of GHD. Evidence from clinical trials and long-term observational studies has informed our ability to understand the unique considerations regarding risks and benefits of daily growth hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) and specific dosing and monitoring strategies for these patient subgroups. High rates of nonadherence with daily GHRT presents a challenge to achieving optimal treatment outcomes and long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) formulations have been developed with the promise of improving treatment adherence resulting in improved therapeutic outcomes. While existing data from short-term studies have demonstrated noninferiority of efficacy and safety of LAGH compared to daily GHRT, long-term studies are needed to assess the full spectrum of outcomes of interest and long-term safety considerations specific to patients in adolescence, adulthood and the elderly GHD population. Since each LAGH formulation has a unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile optimal dosing and monitoring strategies will need to be developed to allow for the provision of individualized patient treatment.

Comparing treatment with daily and long-acting growth hormone formulations in adults with growth hormone deficiency: Challenging issues, benefits, and risks

Daily administration of growth hormone (GH) treatment has been in clinical use for treatment for GH deficiency (GHD) in adults for more than 30 years. Numerous studies have demonstrated evidence that GH treatment improves body composition, cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life with few side effects. Less frequent GH injections are hypothesized to improve adherence and several long-acting GH (LAGH) formulations have been developed and a few have been approved and marketed. Different pharmacological modifications have been applied and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LAGH are different to each other and to those of daily injections and require different dosing and monitoring specific for each LAGH. Studies have shown improved adherence with LAGH, and short-term efficacy and side effects are comparable between daily GH injections and LAGHs. Long-term treatment with daily GH injections is effective and safe, while long-term studies for LAGHs are awaited. In this review challenges, benefits, and risks of treatment with daily and long-acting GH preparations will be compared.

Effective GH Replacement With Somapacitan in Children With GHD: REAL4 2-year Results and After Switch From Daily GH

CONTEXT

Somapacitan is a long-acting GH derivative for treatment of GH deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of somapacitan in children with GHD after 2 years of treatment and after the switch from daily GH.

DESIGN

A randomized, multinational, open-labelled, controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main phase and 3-year safety extension (NCT03811535).

SETTING

Eighty-five sites across 20 countries.

PATIENTS

A total of 200 treatment-naïve prepubertal patients were randomized and exposed; 194 completed the 2-year period.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/d) during the first year, after which all patients received somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/wk.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 104. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, IGF-I SDS, and observer-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

HV was sustained in both groups between 52 and 104 weeks. At week 104, mean (SD) for HV between weeks 52 and 104 was 8.4 (1.5) cm/year after continuous somapacitan treatment and 8.7 (1.8) cm/year after 1 year of somapacitan treatment following switch from daily GH. Secondary height-related endpoints also supported sustained growth. Mean IGF-I SDS during year 2 was similar between groups and within normal range (-2 to +2). Somapacitan was well tolerated, with no safety or tolerability issues identified. GH patient preference questionnaire results show that most patients and their caregivers (90%) who switched treatment at year 2 preferred once-weekly somapacitan over daily GH treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Somapacitan in children with GHD showed sustained efficacy and tolerability for 2 years, and after switching from daily GH. Patients/caregivers switching from daily GH expressed a preference for somapacitan.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03811535.

Growth hormone therapy for children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and glucocorticoid induced short stature

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of recombinant human Growth Hormone (rhGH) therapy in patients with Duchene Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) and glucocorticoid treatment with compromised growth.

DESIGN

Four DMD patients on Deflzacort 0.6-0.85 mg/kg/day or prednisolone 0.625 mg/kg/day recieved rhGH (0.24 mg/kg/week) for 6-18 months. Primary outcomes were Growth velocity and Height for age Z-scores (Height SD).

RESULTS

Growth velocity increased from 0 to 3.25 cm/year prior to GH therapy to 3.3-7.8 cm/year over a period of 6-18 months. The typical Height SD decline in DMD was reversed in two patients and blunted in one. No adverse events or deterioration in cardiac or respiratory parameters were associated with the rhGH treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

rhGH appears to be safe and efficient in promoting growth of patients with glucocorticoid induced growth failure in DMD.

Weekly Somapacitan in GH Deficiency: 4-Year Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment/Disease Burden Results From REAL 3

CONTEXT

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children is currently treated with daily injections of GH, which can be burdensome for patients and their parents/guardians. Somapacitan is a GH derivative in development for once-weekly treatment of GHD.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of somapacitan, and associated disease/treatment burden, after 4 years of treatment and 1 year after switching to somapacitan from daily GH.

METHODS

This long-term safety extension of a multicenter, controlled phase 2 trial (NCT02616562) took place at 29 sites in 11 countries. Patients were prepubertal, GH-naive children with GHD. Fifty patients completed 4 years of treatment. Patients in the pooled group received somapacitan (0.04, 0.08, 0.16 mg/kg/week) for 1 year, followed by the highest dose (0.16 mg/kg/week) for 3 years. Patients in the switched group received daily GH 0.034 mg/kg/day for 3 years, then somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week for 1 year. Main outcome measures were height velocity (HV), change from baseline in HV SD score (SDS), change from baseline in height SDS, disease burden, and treatment burden for patients and parents/guardians.

RESULTS

Changes from baseline in HV and HV SDS were similar and as expected in both groups. Observer-reported outcomes showed that patients and parents/guardians seem to have experienced a reduced treatment burden when switching from daily GH to somapacitan. Most parents/guardians (81.8%) strongly/very strongly preferred somapacitan over daily GH.

CONCLUSIONS

Somapacitan showed similar efficacy and safety in patients who continued somapacitan treatment and those who switched from daily GH to somapacitan. Once-weekly injections may lead to a reduced treatment burden relative to once-daily injections. A plain-language summary of this work is available.

Early GH Treatment Is Effective and Well Tolerated in Children With Turner Syndrome: NordiNet® IOS and Answer Program

CONTEXT

Despite having normal growth hormone (GH) secretion, individuals with Turner syndrome (TS) have short stature. Treatment with recombinant human GH is recommended for TS girls with short stature.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Norditropin (somatropin, Novo Nordisk) with up to 10 years of follow-up in children with TS.

METHODS

Secondary analysis was conducted of Norditropin data from 2 non-interventional studies: NordiNet® IOS (NCT00960128) and the ANSWER program (NCT01009905).

RESULTS

A total of 2377 girls with TS were included in the safety analysis set (SAS), with 1513 in the treatment-naive effectiveness analysis set (EAS). At the start of treatment, 1273 (84%) participants were prepubertal (EAS); mean (SD) age was 8.8 (3.9) years. Mean (SD) dose received at the start of GH treatment was 0.045 (0.011) mg/kg/day (EAS). Mean (SD) baseline insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) SD score (SDS) was -0.86 (1.52), and mean (SD) duration of GH treatment (SAS) was 3.8 (2.8) years.Height SDS (HSDS) increased throughout follow-up, with near-adult HSDS reached by 264 (17%) participants (mean [SD] -1.99 [0.94]; change from baseline +0.90 [0.85]). During the study, 695 (46%) participants (EAS) entered puberty at a mean (SD) age of 12.7 (1.9) years (whether puberty was spontaneous or induced was unknown). Within the SAS, mean IGF-I SDS (SD) at year 10 was 0.91 (1.69); change from baseline +1.48 (1.70). Serious adverse reactions were reported in 10 participants (epiphysiolysis [n = 3]).

CONCLUSION

GH-treated participants with TS responded well, without new safety concerns. Our real-world data are in agreement with previous studies.

GH and Childhood-onset Craniopharyngioma: When to Initiate GH Replacement Therapy?

CONTEXT

Craniopharyngioma is a benign brain tumor with frequent local recurrence or progression after treatment. GH replacement therapy (GHRT) is prescribed in children with GH deficiency resulting from childhood-onset craniopharyngioma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a shorter delay of GHRT initiation after childhood-onset craniopharyngioma completion therapy increased the risk of a new event (progression or recurrence).

METHODS

Retrospective, observational, monocenter study. We compared a cohort of 71 childhood-onset patients with craniopharyngiomas treated with recombinant human GH (rhGH). Twenty-seven patients were treated with rhGH at least 12 months after craniopharyngioma treatment (>12-month group) and 44 patients before 12 months (<12-month group), among which 29 patients were treated between 6 and 12 months (6-12 month group). The main outcome was the risk of tumor new event (progression of residual tumor or tumor recurrence after complete resection) after primary treatment in the >12-month group and in the <12 month or in the 6- to 12-month group patients.

RESULTS

In the >12-month group, the 2- and 5-year event-free survivals were respectively 81.5% (95% CI, 61.1-91.9) and 69.4% (95% CI, 47.9-83.4) compared with 72.2% (95% CI, 56.3-83.1) and 69.8% (95% CI, 53.8-81.2) in the <12-month group. The 2- and 5-year event-free survivals were the same in the 6- to 12-month group (72.4%; 95% CI, 52.4-85.1). By log-rank test, the event-free survival was not different between groups (P = .98 and P = .91).The median time for event was not statistically different.In univariate and multivariate analysis, the risk of craniopharyngioma new event was not associated with the GHRT time delay after craniopharyngioma treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

No association was found between GHRT time delay after childhood-onset craniopharyngioma treatment and an increased risk of recurrence or tumor progression, suggesting GH replacement therapy can be initiated 6 months after last treatment for craniopharyngiomas.

Sex Differences in Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of GH Replacement Therapy in GH Deficient Adults

CONTEXT

Previous studies report that outcomes of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy (GHRT) might be less beneficial in growth hormone deficient (GHD) women compared with men.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated possible contributing factors regarding this previously found sex difference.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study, conducted at a nationwide outpatient clinic (the Dutch National Registry of GH Treatment in Adults), included Dutch adult GHD men (n = 1335) and women (n = 1251) treated with GHRT. The patients' baseline characteristics, details of GHRT, and the tolerability and long-term safety of GHRT were measured.

RESULTS

During treatment, sensitivity analysis showed that insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SD scores remained subnormal more often in women (P < 0.001), while scores above normal were more frequent in men (P < 0.001). Women reported more adverse events (P < 0.001), especially symptoms related to fluid retention, and more often needed a dose reduction or temporary stop of GHRT (P = 0.001). In percentages, both sexes equally discontinued GHRT, as was also true for the risk in developing type 2 diabetes mellitus, benign neoplasms, and tumor recurrence. The risk of developing malignant neoplasms was higher in men (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Data obtained from the Dutch National Registry of GH Treatment in Adults indicate that GHD women might be treated suboptimally, reflected as lower IGF-1 status and lower GHRT tolerability, leading to more frequent changes in treatment regimen but not discontinuation of GHRT. Regarding long-term safety, we found a higher risk for development of malignancies in GHD men.

Safety of Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy in Childhood-Onset Craniopharyngioma: A Systematic Review and Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Survival of childhood-onset craniopharyngioma (cCP) is excellent; however, many survivors suffer from hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction. Growth hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) is of high importance for linear growth and metabolic outcome. Optimal timing for initiation of GHRT in cCP is on debate because of concerns regarding tumor progression or recurrence.

METHODS

A systematic review and cohort studys were performed for the effect and timing of GHRT on overall mortality, tumor progression/recurrence, and secondary tumors in cCP. Within the cohort, cCP receiving GHRT ≤1 year after diagnosis were compared to those receiving GHRT >1 year after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Evidence of 18 included studies, reporting on 6,603 cCP with GHRT, suggests that GHRT does not increase the risk for overall mortality, progression, or recurrent disease. One study evaluated timing of GHRT and progression/recurrence-free survival and found no increased risk with earlier initiation. One study reported a higher than expected prevalence of secondary intracranial tumors compared to a healthy population, possibly confounded by radiotherapy. In our cohort, 75 of 87 cCP (86.2%) received GHRT for median of 4.9 years [0.0-17.1]. No effect of timing of GHRT was found on mortality, progression/recurrence-free survival, or secondary tumors.

CONCLUSION

Although the quality of the evidence is low, the available evidence suggests no effect of GHRT or its timing on mortality, tumor progression/recurrence, or secondary neoplasms in cCP. These results support early initiation of GHRT in cCP aiming to optimize linear growth and metabolic outcome. Prospective studies are needed to increase the level of evidence upon the optimal timing to start GHRT in cCP patients.

Weekly Growth Hormone (Lonapegsomatropin) Causes Severe Transient Hyperglycemia in a Child with Obesity

INTRODUCTION

A 12-year-and-9-month-old non-Hispanic black male with a history of growth hormone deficiency, pituitary hypoplasia, prediabetes, obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia was initiated on weekly growth hormone (lonapegsomatropin-tcgd) and then transiently developed symptomatic hyperglycemia to 500 mg/dL. We aimed to describe this medication's effect.

CASE PRESENTATION

He was born full term and appropriate for gestational age. He was referred to endocrinology at 3.5 years of age for short stature with a height SDS of -2.48. IGF-1 51.1 ng/mL and IGFBP-3 1.2 ng/mL were low. GH stimulation test noted baseline and peak GH of 0.1 ng/mL. MRI brain showed hypoplastic adenohypophysis, aplastic pituitary stalk, and ectopic neurohypophysis. There had been difficulty with adherence to daily GH over the following 9 years. BMI trajectory rose above 180% of the 95th percentile. By age 12, A1c was 6.6%. Metformin was started and increased to 1,000 mg twice daily. Subsequent A1c was 6.0%. Due to poor compliance with daily GH, at 12 years and 9 months, he was initiated on 22 mg (0.25 mg/kg/week) of weekly lonapegsomatropin-tcgd to improve compliance. The day after his first injection, he developed non-bloody, non-bilious emesis. He denied headaches and endorsed polyuria. Due to concern for increased intracranial pressure, he was sent to the emergency department; however, ophthalmologic exam was negative. Initial serum glucose was 500 mg/dL, then 336 mg/dL after 1-L normal saline. Hemoglobin A1c was 5.7%, urine glucose 3+ mg/dL, and urine ketones 2+ mg/dL. Venous pH of 7.379 and bicarbonate of 20.6 mmol/L ruled out diabetic ketoacidosis. Metformin was held during the hospitalization. Hyperglycemia rapidly improved with transient insulin administration. He received one dose of glargine 20 units. He was initiated on lispro carb ratio of 1:8 and correction factor 1:15 for target glucose 150 mg/dL. By day four, glucoses were below 100 mg/dL; lispro was discontinued, and he was discharged home. Weekly GH was discontinued with plans to resume daily GH therapy in several months.

CONCLUSION

Lonapegsomatropin-tcgd offers the convenience of weekly rather than daily GH treatment; however, this patient developed a rapid increase in insulin resistance and hyperglycemia requiring insulin. The discrepancy between the glucose of 500 mg/dL and A1c of 5.7%, along with the rapid resolution of hyperglycemia, is further consistent with a medication side effect. Close glucose monitoring of patients initiated on weekly growth hormone is crucial, particularly in those with a history of prediabetes.

Efficacy and safety of growth hormone therapy in children with Noonan syndrome

Patients with Noonan syndrome typically have a target height <2 standard deviations compared to the general population, and half of the affected adults remain permanently below the 3rd centile for height, though their short stature might result from a multifactorial etiology, not-yet fully understood. The secretion of growth hormone (GH) following the classic GH stimulation tests is often normal, with baseline insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels at the lower normal limits, but patients with Noonan syndrome have also a possible moderate response to GH therapy, leading to a final increased height and substantial improvement in growth rate. Aim of this review was to evaluate both safety and efficacy of GH therapy in children and adolescents with Noonan syndrome, also evaluating as a secondary aim the possible correlations between the underlying genetic mutations and GH responses.

Increase of serum lipoprotein (a), an adverse effect of growth hormone treatment

A number of reports show that high endogenous, or therapeutic administration of human growth hormone (hGH) cause an increase of serum lipoprotein a, Lp(a). Being thrombogenic Lp(a) is an independent risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Hence, it is hypothesized that the recently reported association between childhood hGH treatment and cardiovascular morbidity is probably due to the GH effect on Lp(a) synthesis. It is therefore suggested to determine serum Lp(a) levels before and during hGH treatment in children and adults.

Safety and Efficacy of Pediatric Growth Hormone Therapy: Results From the Full KIGS Cohort

CONTEXT

The Kabi/Pfizer International Growth Database (KIGS) is a large, international database (1987-2012) of children treated with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in real-world settings.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rhGH from the full KIGS cohort.

METHODS

Data were collected by investigators from children with growth disorders treated with rhGH (Genotropin [somatropin]; Pfizer). Safety was evaluated in all treated patients, and efficacy in those treated for 1 year or more. A subgroup included patients treated for 5 years or more (≥ 2 years prepubertal) who had reached near-adult height (NAH). Main outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and height growth.

RESULTS

The full KIGS cohort (N = 83 803 [58% male]) was treated for idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD; 46.9%), organic GHD (10.0%), small for gestational age (SGA; 9.5%), Turner syndrome (TS; 9.2%), idiopathic short stature (ISS; 8.2%), and others (16.2%). Median rhGH treatment duration was 2.7 years and observation 3.1 years. SAEs occurred in 3.7% of patients and death in 0.4%. The most common SAEs were recurrence of craniopharyngioma (n = 151), neoplasm (n = 99), and cancer (n = 91); and scoliosis (n = 91). Median first-year delta height-SD score (SDS) (Prader) in prepubertal patients was 0.66 (IGHD), 0.55 (ISS), 0.58 (TS), and 0.71 (SGA). Median gains in NAH-SDS were 1.79 (IGHD), 1.37 (ISS), and 1.34 (SGA) for boys, and 2.07 (IGHD), 1.62 (ISS), 1.07 (TS), and 1.57 (SGA) for girls.

CONCLUSION

Data from KIGS, the largest and longest running international database of rhGH-treated children, show that rhGH is safe and increases short-term height gain and adult height across GHD and non-GHD conditions.

Weekly Somapacitan is Effective and Well Tolerated in Children With GH Deficiency: The Randomized Phase 3 REAL4 Trial

CONTEXT

Somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, is evaluated in children with GH deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate efficacy and safety of somapacitan vs daily GH.

METHODS

REAL4 is a randomised, multinational, open-labeled, active-controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main trial and 3-year extension (NCT03811535).

SETTING

Eighty-six sites across 20 countries.

PATIENTS

200 treatment-naïve patients were randomized and exposed.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (Norditropin; 0.034 mg/kg/d), administered subcutaneously.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was annualized height velocity (HV; cm/y) at week 52. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, bone age, IGF-I SDS, patient-reported outcomes, and safety measures.

RESULTS

Estimated mean HV at week 52 was 11.2 and 11.7 cm/y for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively. Noninferiority was confirmed. Changes in HV SDS, height SDS, bone age, and IGF-I SDS from baseline to week 52 were similar between treatment groups. At week 52, mean IGF-I SDS values were similar between treatment groups and within normal range (-2 to +2). Safety of somapacitan was consistent with the well-known daily GH profile. Low proportions of injection-site reactions were reported for somapacitan (5.3%) and daily GH (5.9%). Both treatments similarly reduced disease burden from baseline to week 52, whereas a greater treatment burden reduction was observed for somapacitan.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar efficacy for somapacitan compared to daily GH was demonstrated over 52 weeks of treatment with comparable safety and mean IGF-I SDS levels in treatment-naïve children with GHD.

Childhood growth hormone treatment and metabolic and cardiovascular risk in adults born small for gestational age after growth hormone cessation in the Netherlands: a 12-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Childhood growth hormone treatment has been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in adults born small for gestational age (SGA) compared with the general population, but these risks have not been compared with untreated control groups. We aimed to investigate longitundinal metabolic and cardiovascular health in adults born SGA after cessation of growth hormone treatment.

METHODS

We longitudinally investigated the metabolic and cardiovascular health profile of 167 adults born SGA and previously treated with growth hormone during the 12 years after growth hormone cessation. Metabolic and cardiovascular parameters were assessed with the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, serum lipids and blood pressure were measured, body composition was determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and visceral fat was measured by MRI. At approximately age 30 years, we compared the metabolic and cardiovascular health profile of adults born SGA and previously treated with growth hormone (SGA-GH) with 219 untreated adults: 127 born SGA with either persistent short stature (SGA-S) or spontaneous catch-up to typical adult stature (SGA-CU), and 92 born appropriate for gestational age.

FINDINGS

During 12 years of follow-up, SGA-GH adults maintained normal β-cell function (p=0·157 for the difference from growth hormone cessation to 12-year follow-up) and showed an increase in insulin sensitivity (p=0·002), fat mass (p<0·001), total cholesterol (p<0·001), and blood pressure (p<0·001). By around age 30 years, these parameters reached similar levels to those in SGA-S adults (insulin sensitivity p=0·242; fat mass p=0·449; total cholesterol p=0·616; systolic blood pressure p=0·523; diastolic blood pressure p=0·538). By around age 30 years, SGA-GH adults also had similar metabolic and cardiovascular health parameters to adults born appropriate for gestational age, with the exception of lower lean body mass (estimated marginal mean 44·67 kg [95% CI 43·54-45·80] in SGA-GH adults vs 47·65 kg [46·39-48·92] in adults born appropriate for gestational age) and higher concentrations of adverse serum lipids, such as cholesterol (4·75 mmol/L [4·55-4·95] vs 4·33 mmol/L [4·13-4·5]), which were present in all groups born SGA. Abdominal adiposity (visceral adipose tissue p=0·107; subcutaneous adipose tissue: p=0·244), liver fat fraction (p=0·104), and blood pressure (systolic blood pressure 0·927; diastolic blood pressure: 0·737) were similar between SGA-GH adults and all control groups.

INTERPRETATION

At approximately age 30 years, SGA-GH adults had a similar metabolic and cardiovascular health profile to untreated adults born SGA or appropriate for gestational age, indicating long-term metabolic and cardiovascular safety of growth hormone treatment for children born SGA with short stature.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk.

Are there country-specific differences in the use of pegvisomant for acromegaly in clinical practice? An analysis from ACROSTUDY

OBJECTIVE

A comprehensive picture of pegvisomant use for treating acromegaly in routine clinical practice in different countries is lacking. We aimed, therefore, to document country-specific behaviors in real-life pegvisomant use, and the main safety and effectiveness outcomes in the ACROSTUDY.

DESIGN

ACROSTUDY is an open-label, non-interventional, post-marketing safety surveillance study.

METHODS

A descriptive analysis was performed using data from the six top-recruiter ACROSTUDY countries, i.e., Germany (n = 548 patients), Italy (n = 466), France (n = 312), USA (n = 207), Spain (n = 200) and the Netherlands (n = 175). These nations accounted for > 85% of the ACROSTUDY cases.

RESULTS

The mean pegvisomant dose at treatment start was lowest in the Netherlands (9.4 mg/day), whereas it ranged between 10.9 and 12.6 mg/day in the other countries. At year 5, the mean pegvisomant dose was around 15 mg/day in all countries, except France (18.1 mg/day). At starting pegvisomant, patients treated with monotherapy ranged between 15% in the Netherlands and 72% in Spain. Monotherapy remained lowest over time in the Netherlands. In all countries, the percentage of patients with normal IGF-1 increased steeply from < 20% at baseline to 43-58% at month 6 and 51-67% at year 1. After that, we observed minor changes in the rate of acromegaly control in all countries. The Netherlands peaked in disease control at year 2 (72%). The proportion of patients reporting changes in pituitary tumor size was generally low. Serious treatment-related adverse events were < 5% in all countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provided a detailed summary of real-life use of pegvisomant in the six top-recruiter ACROSTUDY nations.

Long-term Safety of Growth Hormone in Adults With Growth Hormone Deficiency: Overview of 15 809 GH-Treated Patients

CONTEXT

Data on long-term safety of growth hormone (GH) replacement in adults with GH deficiency (GHD) are needed.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the safety of GH in the full KIMS (Pfizer International Metabolic Database) cohort.

METHODS

The worldwide, observational KIMS study included adults and adolescents with confirmed GHD. Patients were treated with GH (Genotropin [somatropin]; Pfizer, NY) and followed through routine clinical practice. Adverse events (AEs) and clinical characteristics (eg, lipid profile, glucose) were collected.

RESULTS

A cohort of 15 809 GH-treated patients were analyzed (mean follow-up of 5.3 years). AEs were reported in 51.2% of patients (treatment-related in 18.8%). Crude AE rate was higher in patients who were older, had GHD due to pituitary/hypothalamic tumors, or adult-onset GHD. AE rate analysis adjusted for age, gender, etiology, and follow-up time showed no correlation with GH dose. A total of 606 deaths (3.8%) were reported (146 by neoplasms, 71 by cardiac/vascular disorders, 48 by cerebrovascular disorders). Overall, de novo cancer incidence was comparable to that in the general population (standard incidence ratio 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.01). De novo cancer risk was significantly lower in patients with idiopathic/congenital GHD (0.64; 0.43-0.91), but similar in those with pituitary/hypothalamic tumors or other etiologies versus the general population. Neither adult-onset nor childhood-onset GHD was associated with increased de novo cancer risks. Neutral effects were observed in lipids/fasting blood glucose levels.

CONCLUSION

These final KIMS cohort data support the safety of long-term GH replacement in adults with GHD as prescribed in routine clinical practice.

Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Somatrogon vs Daily Somatropin in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Phase 3 Study

CONTEXT

Somatrogon is a long-acting recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in development for once-weekly treatment of children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon with once-daily somatropin in prepubertal children with GHD.

METHODS

In this 12-month, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive once-weekly somatrogon (0.66 mg/kg/week) or once-daily somatropin (0.24 mg/kg/week) for 12 months. A total of 228 prepubertal children (boys aged 3-11 years, girls aged 3-10 years) with GHD, impaired height and height velocity (HV), and no prior rhGH treatment were randomized and 224 received ≥1 dose of study treatment (somatrogon: 109; somatropin: 115). The primary endpoint was annualized HV at month 12.

RESULTS

HV at month 12 was 10.10 cm/year for somatrogon-treated subjects and 9.78 cm/year for somatropin-treated subjects, with a treatment difference (somatrogon-somatropin) of 0.33 (95% CI: -0.24, 0.89). The lower bound of the 2-sided 95% CI was higher than the prespecified noninferiority margin (-1.8 cm/year), demonstrating noninferiority of once-weekly somatrogon vs daily somatropin. HV at month 6 and change in height standard deviation score at months 6 and 12 were similar between both treatment groups. Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar percentage of subjects experiencing mild to moderate treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups (somatrogon: 78.9%, somatropin: 79.1%).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of once-weekly somatrogon was noninferior to once-daily somatropin, with similar safety and tolerability profiles. (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT02968004).

Safety and Efficacy of Lonapegsomatropin in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: enliGHten Trial 2-Year Results

PURPOSE

The objectives of the ongoing, Phase 3, open-label extension trial enliGHten are to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of weekly administered long-acting growth hormone lonapegsomatropin in children with growth hormone deficiency.

METHODS

Eligible subjects completing a prior Phase 3 lonapegsomatropin parent trial (heiGHt or fliGHt) were invited to participate. All subjects were treated with lonapegsomatropin. Subjects in the United States switched to the TransCon hGH Auto-Injector when available. Endpoints were long-term safety, annualized height velocity, pharmacodynamics [insulin-like growth factor-1 SD score (SDS) values], and patient- and caregiver-reported assessments of convenience and tolerability.

RESULTS

Lonapegsomatropin treatment during enliGHten was associated with continued improvements in height SDS through week 104 in treatment-naïve subjects from the heiGHt trial (-2.89 to -1.37 for the lonapegsomatropin group; -3.0 to -1.52 for the daily somatropin group). Height SDS also continued to improve among switch subjects from the fliGHt trial (-1.42 at fliGHt baseline to -0.69 at week 78). After 104 weeks, the average bone age/chronological age ratio for each treatment group was 0.8 (0.1), showing only minimal advancement of bone age relative to chronological age with continued lonapegsomatropin treatment among heiGHt subjects. Fewer local tolerability reactions were reported with the TransCon hGH Auto-Injector compared with syringe/needle.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with lonapegsomatropin continued to be safe and well-tolerated, with no new safety signals identified. Children treated with once-weekly lonapegsomatropin showed continued improvement of height SDS through the second year of therapy without excess advancement of bone age.

Safety of growth hormone replacement in survivors of cancer and intracranial and pituitary tumours: a consensus statement

Growth hormone (GH) has been used for over 35 years, and its safety and efficacy has been studied extensively. Experimental studies showing the permissive role of GH/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) in carcinogenesis have raised concerns regarding the safety of GH replacement in children and adults who have received treatment for cancer and those with intracranial and pituitary tumours. A consensus statement was produced to guide decision-making on GH replacement in children and adult survivors of cancer, in those treated for intracranial and pituitary tumours and in patients with increased cancer risk. With the support of the European Society of Endocrinology, the Growth Hormone Research Society convened a Workshop, where 55 international key opinion leaders representing 10 professional societies were invited to participate. This consensus statement utilized: (1) a critical review paper produced before the Workshop, (2) five plenary talks, (3) evidence-based comments from four breakout groups, and (4) discussions during report-back sessions. Current evidence reviewed from the proceedings from the Workshop does not support an association between GH replacement and primary tumour or cancer recurrence. The effect of GH replacement on secondary neoplasia risk is minor compared to host- and tumour treatment-related factors. There is no evidence for an association between GH replacement and increased mortality from cancer amongst GH-deficient childhood cancer survivors. Patients with pituitary tumour or craniopharyngioma remnants receiving GH replacement do not need to be treated or monitored differently than those not receiving GH. GH replacement might be considered in GH-deficient adult cancer survivors in remission after careful individual risk/benefit analysis. In children with cancer predisposition syndromes, GH treatment is generally contraindicated but may be considered cautiously in select patients.

Treatment of Short Stature in Aggrecan-deficient Patients With Recombinant Human Growth Hormone: 1-Year Response

CONTEXT

Patients with aggrecan (ACAN) deficiency present with dominantly inherited short stature, often with advanced skeletal maturation and premature growth cessation. There is a paucity of information on the effects of growth-promoting interventions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy on linear growth in children with ACAN deficiency.

METHODS

Open-label, single-arm, prospective study at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Ten treatment-naïve patients were recruited. Inclusion criteria were a confirmed heterozygous mutation in ACAN, age ≥2 years, prepubertal, bone age (BA) ≥chronological age (CA), and normal insulin-like growth factor I concentration. Treatment was with rhGH (50 µg/kg/day) over 1 year. Main outcomes measured were height velocity (HV) and change in (Δ) height SD score (HtSDS).

RESULTS

Ten patients (6 females) were enrolled with median CA of 5.6 years (range 2.4-9.7). Baseline median HtSDS was -2.5 (range -4.3 to -1.1). Median baseline BA was 6.9 years (range 2.5-10.0), with median BA/CA of 1.2 (range 0.9-1.5). Median pretreatment HV was 5.2 cm/year (range 3.8-7.1), increased to 8.3 cm/year (range 7.3-11.2) after 1 year of therapy (P = .004). Median ΔHtSDS after 1 year was +0.62 (range +0.35 to +1.39) (P = .002). Skeletal maturation did not advance inappropriately (median ΔBA/CA -0.1, P = .09). No adverse events related to rhGH were observed.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with rhGH improved linear growth in a cohort of patients with short stature due to ACAN deficiency.

State of the Art of Patient-reported Outcomes in Acromegaly or GH Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Insight into the current landscape of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROM) and differences between PROs and conventional biochemical outcomes is pivotal for future implementation of PROs in research and clinical practice. Therefore, in studies among patients with acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD), we evaluated (1) used PROMs, (2) their validity, (3) quality of PRO reporting, (4) agreement between PROs and biochemical outcomes, and (5) determinants of discrepancies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched 8 electronic databases for prospective studies describing both PROs and biochemical outcomes in acromegaly and GHD patients. Quality of PRO reporting was assessed using the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) criteria. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate determinants.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Ninety studies were included (acromegaly: n = 53; GHD: n = 37). Besides nonvalidated symptom lists (used in 37% of studies), 36 formal PROMs were used [predominantly Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire in acromegaly (43%) and Quality of Life-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults in GHD (43%)]. Reporting of PROs was poor, with a median of 37% to 47% of ISOQOL items being reported per study. Eighteen (34%) acromegaly studies and 12 (32%) GHD studies reported discrepancies between PROs and biochemical outcomes, most often improvement in biochemical outcomes without change in PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective studies among patients with acromegaly and GHD use a multitude of PROMs, often poorly reported. Since a substantial proportion of studies report discrepancies between PROs and biochemical outcomes, PROMs are pivotal in the evaluation of disease activity. Therefore, harmonization of PROs in clinical practice and research by development of core outcome sets is an important unmet need.

Metabolic Impacts of Discontinuation and Resumption of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Treatment during the Transition Period in Patients with Childhood-Onset Growth Hormone Deficiency

BACKGROUND

Discontinuing growth hormone (GH) treatment during the transition to adulthood has been associated with adverse health outcomes in patients with childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency (CO-GHD). This study investigated the metabolic changes associated with interrupting GH treatment in adolescents with CO-GHD during the transition period.

METHODS

This study included 187 patients with CO-GHD who were confirmed to have adult GHD and were treated at six academic centers in Korea. Data on clinical parameters, including anthropometric measurements, metabolic profiles, and bone mineral density (BMD) at the end of childhood GH treatment, were collected at the time of re-evaluation for GHD and 1 year after treatment resumption.

RESULTS

Most patients (n=182, 97.3%) had organic GHD. The median age at treatment discontinuation and re-evaluation was 15.6 and 18.7 years, respectively. The median duration of treatment interruption was 2.8 years. During treatment discontinuation, body mass index Z-scores and total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increased, whereas fasting glucose levels decreased. One year after GH treatment resumption, fasting glucose levels, HDL cholesterol levels, and femoral neck BMD increased significantly. Longer GH interruption (>2 years, 60.4%) resulted in worse lipid profiles at re-evaluation. The duration of interruption was positively correlated with fasting glucose and non-HDL cholesterol levels after adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSION

GH treatment interruption during the transition period resulted in worse metabolic parameters, and a longer interruption period was correlated with poorer outcomes. GH treatment should be resumed early in patients with CO-GHD during the transition period.

Long-Acting Growth Hormone Preparations and Their Use in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency

BACKGROUND

Daily recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) is approved and marketed worldwide to treat children and adults with GH deficiency and other conditions. Efficacy of rhGH therapy is influenced by several variables. Drop of treatment adherence over time has been recognized as a cause of reduced rhGH efficacy and has driven considerable efforts from pharmaceutical companies and scientists to develop long-acting rhGH (LAGH) formulations in order to relieve patients and their families from the burden of daily injections.

SUMMARY

Different technologies to manipulate drug release have been produced allowing weekly, biweekly, or monthly rhGH administration. The LAGH formulations developed at present have demonstrated a comparable or even higher efficacy as compared with daily rhGH in most of the cases and no major safety issues in phase 3 studies. A greater incidence of injection-site reactions has been reported but mainly of mild and transient nature.

KEY MESSAGES

Despite LAGH analogs appearing promising, potential drawbacks still need to be addressed. Long-term consequences of nonphysiological GH profile and its consequences on metabolism and risk of cancer, optimal therapeutic monitoring, immunogenicity of LAGH molecules, and potential novel side effects related to the technologies used to develop these molecules are among the major concerns that require answers from long-term surveillance. Finally, increased acceptance of LAGH formulations from patients and their caregivers is yet to be demonstrated and cost-effectiveness evaluated consequently.

Approach to the Patient: Safety of Growth Hormone Replacement in Children and Adolescents

The use of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in children and adolescents has expanded since its initial approval to treat patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD) in 1985. rhGH is now approved to treat several conditions associated with poor growth and short stature. Recent studies have raised concerns that treatment during childhood may affect morbidity and mortality in adulthood, with specific controversies over cancer risk and cerebrovascular events. We will review 3 common referrals to a pediatric endocrinology clinic, followed by a summary of short- and long-term effects of rhGH beyond height outcomes. Methods to mitigate risk will be reviewed. Finally, this information will be applied to each clinical case, highlighting differences in counseling and clinical outcomes. rhGH therapy has been used for more than 3 decades. Data are largely reassuring, yet we still have much to learn about pharmaceutical approaches to growth in children and the lifelong effect of treatment.

A Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone in Children With Idiopathic Short Stature

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of daily somatropin (Jintropin^®), a recombinant human growth hormone, in prepubertal children with ISS in China.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 3 study. All subjects were randomized 3:1 to daily somatropin 0.05 mg/kg/day or no treatment for 52 weeks. A total of 481 subjects with a mean baseline age of 5.8 years were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was change in (△) height standard deviation score (HT-SDS) for chronological age (CA). Secondary endpoints included △height from baseline; △bone age (BA)/CA; △height velocity (HV) and △insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1 SDS).

RESULTS

△HT-SDS at week 52 was 1.04 ± 0.31 in the treatment group and 0.20 ± 0.33 in the control group (P < 0.001). At week 52, statistical significance was observed in the treatment group compared with control for △height (10.19 ± 1.47 cm vs. 5.85 ± 1.80 cm; P < 0.001), △BA/CA (0.04 ± 0.09 vs. 0.004 ± 0.01; P < 0.001), △HV (5.17 ± 3.70 cm/year vs. 0.75 ± 4.34 cm/year; P < 0.001), and △IGF-1 SDS (2.31 ± 1.20 vs. 0.22 ± 0.98; P < 0.001). The frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar for the treatment and the control groups (89.8% vs. 82.4%); most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity and 23 AEs were considered study-drug related.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily subcutaneous administration of somatropin at 0.05 mg/kg/day for 52 weeks demonstrated improvement in growth outcomes and was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03635580). URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03635580.

PEGylated Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Jintrolong® Exhibits Good Long-Term Safety in Cynomolgus Monkeys and Human Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency Patients

Jintrolong^® is a long-acting PEGylated recombinant human growth hormone (PEG-rhGH) developed for weekly injection in patients with pediatric growth hormone deficiency (PGHD). Although PEG modification of therapeutic proteins is generally considered safe, concerns persist about the potential for adverse vacuolation in tissues with long-term exposure to PEG-included therapies, particularly in children. We assessed the safety of Jintrolong^® in cynomolgus monkeys with an examination of vacuolation in the brain choroid plexus (CP) and reported long-term clinical safety data obtained from children with PGHD. The toxicity of Jintrolong^® was assessed following the 52-week administration with doses at 0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg/week. The levels of vacuolation of CP in animals were dose-dependent and at least partially reversible after a 104- or 157-week recovery period. Vacuolation in the CP epithelium did not lead to obvious subcellular structural or cell functional abnormalities. Compared with the clinical dose of 0.2 mg/kg/week Jintrolong^® in PGHD patients, exposure in monkeys under NOAEL 3 mg/kg/week exhibited safety margins greater than 120.5, the predicted minimum dose to induce vacuolation in monkeys is equivalent to 1.29 mg/kg/week in humans, which is 6.45-fold higher than the clinical dose. The safety data acquired in clinical trials for Jintrolong^® were also analyzed, which included phase III (360 patients), phase IV (3,000 patients) of 26-week treatment, and a follow-up study with treatment lasting for 3 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the Jintrolong^® group and the daily rhGH control group (no PEG), and no new adverse effects (AE) were observed in the Jintrolong^® group at the clinical therapeutic dose of 0.2 mg/kg/week.

Cardiovascular risk profile in growth hormone-treated adults with craniopharyngioma compared to non-functioning pituitary adenoma: a national cohort study

CONTEXT

Cardiovascular (CV) risk profile might differ between growth hormone-treated patients with craniopharyngioma and non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA), since patients with craniopharyngioma more frequently suffer from hypothalamic metabolic disruption.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the CV risk profile in adult patients with craniopharyngioma compared to NFPA before and after treatment with growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy due to severe GH deficiency.

DESIGN

A sub-analysis of the Dutch National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment in Adults was performed, in which we compared 291 patients with craniopharyngioma to 778 patients with NFPA. CV risk profile and morbidity were evaluated at baseline and during long-term follow-up within and between both groups.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients with craniopharyngioma demonstrated higher BMI than patients with NFPA, and men with craniopharyngioma showed greater waist circumference and lower HDL compared to men with NFPA. During follow-up, BMI, as well as diastolic blood pressure among patients using antihypertensive drugs, deteriorated in the craniopharyngioma group compared to the NFPA group. Lipid profile improved similarly in both groups over time. No differences were found between groups in the occurrence of diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accidents, CV disease, or overall mortality.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that overall CV risk profile is worse in craniopharyngioma patients with GH deficiency compared to patients with NFPA. During GH replacement therapy, patients with craniopharyngioma demonstrated an increase in BMI over time, where BMI remained stable in patients with NFPA. Also, diastolic blood pressure did not improve with antihypertensive drugs in craniopharyngioma patients as seen in patients with NFPA.

Cost-Utility of Acromegaly Pharmacological Treatments in a French Context

Objective

Efficacy of pharmacological treatments for acromegaly has been assessed in many clinical or real-world studies but no study was interested in economics evaluation of these treatments in France. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the cost-utility of second-line pharmacological treatments in acromegaly patients.

Methods

A Markov model was developed to follow a cohort of 1,000 patients for a lifetime horizon. First-generation somatostatin analogues (FGSA), pegvisomant, pasireotide and pegvisomant combined with FGSA (off label) were compared. Efficacy was defined as the normalization of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentration and was obtained from pivotal trials and adjusted by a network meta-analysis. Costs data were obtained from French databases and literature. Utilities from the literature were used to estimate quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

Results

The incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) of treatments compared to FGSA were estimated to be 562,463 € per QALY gained for pasireotide, 171,332 € per QALY gained for pegvisomant, and 186,242 € per QALY gained for pegvisomant + FGSA. Pasireotide seems to be the least cost-efficient treatment. Sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of the results.

Conclusion

FGSA, pegvisomant and pegvisomant + FGSA were on the cost-effective frontier, therefore, depending on the willingness-to-pay for an additional QALY, they are the most cost-effective treatments. This medico-economic analysis highlighted the consistency of the efficiency results with the efficacy results assessed in the pivotal trials. However, most recent treatment guidelines recommend an individualized treatment strategy based on the patient and disease profile.

Cardiac functions in children with growth hormone deficiency: Effects of one year of GH replacement therapy

INTRODUCTION

Children with Growth Hormone deficiency (GHD) are prone to heart dysfunction and, if left untreated, will result in marked cardiac dysfunction in adulthood. The aim was to evaluate the effect of GHD and growth hormone (GH) therapy on cardiac structure in children and adolescents, and to investigate the role of insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in this.

METHODS

M-mode, pulse-wave Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) were performed in 49 children with GHD who were divided into those with a peak GH response < 7 μg/L and 7-10 μg/L after two GH stimulation tests, aged 8-16 years at baseline and at six and 12 months after GH initiation, and 49 healthy peers. IGF-1 concentration was measured.

RESULTS

Although the left ventricular end diastolic and systolic diameters in both GH deficient groups were significantly lower than controls (p < 0.01), both diameters increased significantly with one year of treatment and achieved normal values (p > 0.05). Using TDI in both two patients group revealed increased E/A, prolonged isovolumic relaxation time, shortened ejection time, and a significant increase in myocardial performance index compared to controls (p < 0.001). Significant improvement was observed in these parameters from the sixth month of GH treatment (p < 0.001), this improvement does not match parameters measured in healthy peers, even after one year of treatment in both patients group. (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between IGF-1 concentration and any echocardiographic parameter.

CONCLUSION

Echocardiographic parameters were similar in children with a GH peak < 7 μg/L and 7-10 μg/L. In TDI, both systolic and diastolic function was impaired in GHD children compared to controls. These parameters improved after one year of GH therapy but did not recover to healthy control levels.

Thyroid-related ophthalmopathy development in concurrence with growth hormone administration

BACKGROUND

Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor and local infiltrate lymphocytes have been considered as major pathological factors for developing thyroid-related ophthalmopathy. Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for refractory patients. However, the relationship between activation of growth hormone (GH)/IGF-I receptor signaling and development or exacerbation of thyroid ophthalmopathy has not been elucidated. Herein we describe a case that provides further clarification into the association between thyroid-related ophthalmopathy and GH/IGF-I receptor signaling.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 62-year-old Japanese female diagnosed with thyroid-related ophthalmopathy was admitted to Kurume University Hospital. She had received daily administration of GH subcutaneously for severe GH deficiency; however, serum IGF-I levels were greater than + 2 standard deviation based on her age and sex. She exhibited mild thyrotoxicosis and elevation in levels of TSH-stimulating antibody. Discontinuation of GH administration attenuated the clinical activity scores of her thyroid-related ophthalmopathy. Additionally, concomitant use of glucocorticoid and radiation therapies resulted in further improvement of thyroid-related ophthalmopathy. The glucocorticoid administration was reduced sequentially, followed by successful termination. Thereafter, the patient did not undergo recurrence of thyroid-related ophthalmopathy and maintained serum IGF-I levels within normal physiological levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe here a case in which development of thyroid-related ophthalmopathy occurred upon initiation of GH administration. GH/IGF-I signaling was highlighted as a risk factor of developing thyroid-related ophthalmopathy. Additionally, aberrant TSH receptor expression was suggested to be a primary pathophysiological mechanism within the development of thyroid-related ophthalmopathy. Physicians should be aware of the risks incurred via GH administration, especially for patients of advanced age, for induction of thyroid-related ophthalmopathy.

Growth Hormone Treatment and Papilledema: A Prospective Pilot Study

Objective

To investigate the incidence of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS) in children treated with growth hormone (GH) in a paediatric hospital and to identify risk factors for this complication.

Methods

Prospective pilot study of paediatric patients treated with recombinant human GH, prescribed by the Paediatric Endocrinology Department, between February 2013 and September 2017. In all these patients, a fundus examination was performed before starting treatment and 3-4 months later.

Results

Two hundred and eighty-nine patients were included, of whom 244 (84.4%) had GH deficiency, 36 (12.5%) had short stature associated with small for gestational age, six (2.1%) had a mutation in the SHOX gene and three (1.0%) had Prader-Willi syndrome. Five (1.7%) developed papilledema, all were asymptomatic and had GH deficiency due to craniopharyngioma (n=1), polymalformative syndrome associated with hypothalamic-pituitary axis anomalies (n=2), a non-specified genetic disease with hippocampal inversion (n=1) and one with normal magnetic resonance imaging who had developed a primary PTCS years before.

Conclusion

GH treatment is a cause of PTCS. In our series, at risk patients had GH deficiency and hypothalamic-pituitary anatomic anomalies or genetic or chromosomal diseases. Fundus examination should be systematically screened in all patients in this at-risk group, irrespective of the presence or not of symptoms.

Long-Term Safety of Growth Hormone Treatment in Childhood: Two Large Observational Studies: NordiNet IOS and ANSWER

CONTEXT

Growth hormone (GH) treatment has a generally good safety profile; however, concerns about increased mortality risk in adulthood have been raised.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to assess the long-term safety of GH treatment in clinical practice.

METHODS

Data were collected from 676 clinics participating in 2 multicenter longitudinal observational studies: the NordiNet International Outcome Study (2006-2016, Europe) and ANSWER Program (2002-2016, USA). Pediatric patients treated with GH were classified into 3 risk groups based on diagnosis. Intervention consisted of daily GH treatment, and main outcome measures included incidence rates (events/1000 patient-years) of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and serious ADRs, and their relationship to GH dose.

RESULTS

The combined studies comprised 37 702 patients (68.4% in low-risk, 27.5% in intermediate-risk, and 4.1% in high-risk groups) and 130 476 patient-years of exposure. The low-risk group included children born small for gestational age (SGA; 20.7%) and non-SGA children (eg, with GH deficiency; 79.3%). Average GH dose up to the first adverse event (AE) decreased with increasing risk category. Patients without AEs received higher average GH doses than patients with more than one AE across all groups. A significant inverse relationship with GH dose was shown for ADR and SAE incidence rates in the low-risk group (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively) and the non-SGA subgroup (both P = .002), and for SAEs in the intermediate- and high-risk groups (P = .002 and P = .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed no indication of increased mortality risk nor AE incidence related to GH dose in any risk group. A short visual summary of our work is available (1).

Growth hormone control and cardiovascular function in patients with acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is associated with cardiovascular alterations. Up to 50% acromegalic patients suffered from treatment failure after multiple modalities. We investigated correlation between cardiovascular function and control of growth hormone (GH) in acromegalic patients following transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA).

METHODS

We recruited acromegalic patients who had undergone TSA between 2006 and 2014 in this cross-sectional study. Patients were assigned to group 1, controlled acromegaly (GH <1.0 ng/mL and normalized insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1]); group 2, partially controlled acromegaly (either GH >1.0 ng/mL or non-normalized IGF-1); or group 3, uncontrolled acromegaly (GH >1.0 ng/mL and non-normalized IGF-1). Echocardiography evaluated the left ventricular mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and the early transmitral filling velocity (E)-to-late transmitral filling velocity (A) and the E-to-the early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') ratios. Carotid tonometry evaluated the intima-media thickness of the carotid artery, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, aortic characteristic impedance (Zc), and pulse pressure amplification.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients participated in this study. Fourteen of the 33 patients were males (42%). Mean age at diagnosis was 50.33 years (SD 18.45). Compared to patients in group 1, patients in group 3 had younger age and shorter years after operation, without statistical significance. Cumulative GH levels were progressively higher from group 1 to group 3, without statistical significance. The groups did not differ with respect to cardiovascular structure and function evaluated by echocardiography and carotid tonometry. Only Zc value had a difference that was of borderline significance (group 1: 109.13 ± 32.99; group 2: 129.30 ± 32.27; group 3: 159.56 ± 77.4 dynes × s/cm5; ANOVA p = 0.088; p = 0.086 for group 1 vs group 3).

CONCLUSION

In the patients with acromegaly who had undergone TSA, cardiac structure and vascular stiffness did not differ among the groups with different levels of GH control.

Reduced Effectiveness and Comparable Safety in Biweekly vs. Weekly PEGylated Recombinant Human Growth Hormone for Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Phase IV Non-Inferiority Threshold Targeted Trial

CONTEXT

Long-acting recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) has transformed growth hormone deficiency (GHD) treatment. However, the possibility and rationality for flexible time regimen are pending.

OBJECTIVE

We studied the efficacy of biweekly versus weekly PEGylated rhGH (PEG-rhGH) therapy in GHD children.

DESIGN SETTING AND PATIENTS

This multicenter, phase IV trial with a non-inferiority threshold ≥20% enrolled 585 Tanner stage I GHD children.

INTERVENTION

Subjects randomly received 0.20 mg/kg once-weekly or biweekly PEG-rhGH, or 0.25 mg/kg.w rhGH once daily for 26 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was height SD scores for chronological age (HtSDS_CA) at week 26 and safety measurements including adverse events (AEs), IGF-2, and IGFBP-2 changes.

RESULTS

At week 26, the median HtSDS_CA changed from -2.75, -2.82, and -2.78 to -2.31, -2.43, and -2.28 with weekly and biweekly PEG-rhGH, and daily rhGH, respectively. The difference in HtSDS_CA was 0.17 ± 0.28 between weekly and biweekly PEG-rhGH, and 0.17 ± 0.27 between daily rhGH and biweekly PEG-rhGH, failing the non-inferiority threshold. Nevertheless, the height velocity of children receiving biweekly PEG-rhGH reached 76.42%-90.34% and 76.08%-90.60% that of children receiving weekly PEG-rhGH and daily rhGH, respectively. The rate of AEs was comparable among the groups. No statistical difference was observed in IGF-2 and IGFBP-2 levels among the groups. IGFBP-2 levels decreased over time in all groups, with no notable difference in IGF-2 and IGFBP-2 changes among the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although notably promoted height velocity, biweekly PEG-rhGH failed the non-inferiority threshold as compared with either weekly PEG-rhGH or daily rhGH. Compared with short-term rhGH, long-acting PEG-rhGH did not significantly increase tumor-associated IGF-2 and IGFBP-2 expressions.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02976675.

Safety of Pediatric rhGH Therapy: An Overview and the Need for Long-Term Surveillance

Growth hormone (GH) therapy dates back to 1958 and, though has shown an excellent safety profile in the short-term, has never ceased to raise concern about potential long-term side effects. In the last decade, a number of observational studies in different cohorts of young adult patients treated with GH during childhood have yielded conflicting results. The attention has mainly focused on three major potential risks associated with GH therapy: cancer, cardio and cerebrovascular diseases and diabetes. This review intends to provide a detailed overview of the main studies reporting long-term safety in subjects treated with rhGH therapy during childhood, highlighting the evidence for or against the risk of cancer, cardio and cerebrovascular diseases and diabetes.

Should Skeletal Maturation Be Manipulated for Extra Height Gain?

Skeletal maturation can be delayed by reducing the exposure to estrogens, either by halting pubertal development through administering a GnRH analogue (GnRHa), or by blocking the conversion of androgens to estrogens through an aromatase inhibitor (AI). These agents have been investigated in children with growth disorders (off-label), either alone or in combination with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). GnRHa is effective in attaining a normal adult height (AH) in the treatment of children with central precocious puberty, but its effect in short children with normal timing of puberty is equivocal. If rhGH-treated children with growth hormone deficiency or those who were born small-for-gestational age are still short at pubertal onset, co-treatment with a GnRHa for 2-3 years increases AH. A similar effect was seen by adding rhGH to GnRHa treatment of children with central precocious puberty with a poor AH prediction and by adding rhGH plus GnRHa to children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia with a poor predicted adult height on conventional treatment with gluco- and mineralocorticoids. In girls with idiopathic short stature and relatively early puberty, rhGH plus GnRHa increases AH. Administration of letrozole to boys with constitutional delay of growth puberty may increase AH, and rhGH plus anastrozole may increase AH in boys with growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature, but the lack of data on attained AH and potential selective loss-of-follow-up in several studies precludes firm conclusions. GnRHas appear to have a good overall safety profile, while for aromatase inhibitors conflicting data have been reported.

Usefulness and Potential Pitfalls of Long-Acting Growth Hormone Analogs

Daily recombinant human GH (rhGH) is currently approved for use in children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD) in many countries with relatively few side-effects. Nevertheless, daily injections can be painful and distressing for some patients, often resulting in non-adherence and reduction of treatment outcomes. This has prompted the development of numerous long-acting GH (LAGH) analogs that allow for decreased injection frequency, ranging from weekly, bi-weekly to monthly. These LAGH analogs are attractive as they may theoretically offer increased patient acceptance, tolerability, and therapeutic flexibility. Conversely, there may also be pitfalls to these LAGH analogs, including an unphysiological GH profile and differing molecular structures that pose potential clinical issues in terms of dose initiation, therapeutic monitoring, incidence and duration of side-effects, and long-term safety. Furthermore, fluctuations of peak and trough serum GH and IGF-I levels and variations in therapeutic efficacy may depend on the technology used to prolong GH action. Previous studies of some LAGH analogs have demonstrated non-inferiority compared to daily rhGH in terms of increased growth velocity and improved body composition in children and adults with GHD, respectively, with no significant unanticipated adverse events. Currently, two LAGH analogs are marketed in Asia, one recently approved in the United States, another previously approved but not marketed in Europe, and several others proceeding through various stages of clinical development. Nevertheless, several practical questions still remain, including possible differences in dose initiation between naïve and switch-over patients, methodology of dose adjustment/s, timing of measuring serum IGF-I levels, safety, durability of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Long-term surveillance of safety and efficacy of LAGH analogs are needed to answer these important questions.