Cost-Utility of Acromegaly Pharmacological Treatments in a French Context

Objective

Efficacy of pharmacological treatments for acromegaly has been assessed in many clinical or real-world studies but no study was interested in economics evaluation of these treatments in France. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the cost-utility of second-line pharmacological treatments in acromegaly patients.

Methods

A Markov model was developed to follow a cohort of 1,000 patients for a lifetime horizon. First-generation somatostatin analogues (FGSA), pegvisomant, pasireotide and pegvisomant combined with FGSA (off label) were compared. Efficacy was defined as the normalization of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentration and was obtained from pivotal trials and adjusted by a network meta-analysis. Costs data were obtained from French databases and literature. Utilities from the literature were used to estimate quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

Results

The incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) of treatments compared to FGSA were estimated to be 562,463 € per QALY gained for pasireotide, 171,332 € per QALY gained for pegvisomant, and 186,242 € per QALY gained for pegvisomant + FGSA. Pasireotide seems to be the least cost-efficient treatment. Sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of the results.

Conclusion

FGSA, pegvisomant and pegvisomant + FGSA were on the cost-effective frontier, therefore, depending on the willingness-to-pay for an additional QALY, they are the most cost-effective treatments. This medico-economic analysis highlighted the consistency of the efficiency results with the efficacy results assessed in the pivotal trials. However, most recent treatment guidelines recommend an individualized treatment strategy based on the patient and disease profile.

Pharmacological Acromegaly Treatment: Cost-Utility and Value of Information Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing drug strategies involving octreotide, lanreotide, pasireotide, and pegvisomant for the treatment of patients with acromegaly who have failed surgery, from a Brazilian public payer perspective.

METHODS

A probabilistic cohort Markov model was developed. One-year cycles were employed. The patients started at 45 years of age and were followed lifelong. Costs, efficacy, and quality of life parameters were retrieved from the literature. A discount rate (5%) was applied to both costs and efficacy. The results were reported as costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated when applicable. Scenario analyses considered alternative dosages, discount rate, tax exemption, and continued use of treatment despite lack of response. Value of information (VOI) analysis was conducted to explore uncertainty and to estimate the costs to be spent in future research.

RESULTS

Only lanreotide showed an ICER reasonable for having its use considered in clinical practice (R$ 112,138/US$ 28,389 per QALY compared to no treatment). Scenario analyses corroborated the base-case result. VOI analysis showed that much uncertainty surrounds the parameters, and future clinical research should cost less than R$ 43,230,000/US$ 10,944,304 per year. VOI also showed that almost all uncertainty that precludes an optimal strategy choice involves quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

With current information, the only strategy that can be considered cost-effective in Brazil is lanreotide treatment. No second-line treatment is recommended. Significant uncertainty of parameters impairs optimal decision-making, and this conclusion can be generalized to other countries. Future research should focus on acquiring utility data.

Costs of treatment change following first-line somatostatin analog monotherapy among patients with neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

This study describes treatment characteristics and healthcare costs prior to and following treatment change from somatostatin analog (SSA) monotherapy among a privately-insured NET patient population in the US.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed NET and treated with SSA monotherapy were retrospectively identified in IBM MarketScan claims between 1/1/2014 and 3/31/2019. NET treatment change was captured ≥30 days after the SSA start date (earliest new treatment = index date). Healthcare costs (reimbursed amount in 2019 dollars) were reported for 1, 3, and 6 months pre- and post-index intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients were identified (mean age: 58 years; female: 52%; metastatic disease: 49%). Most patients started on octreotide (81%) vs. lanreotide (19%). Common treatment changes included alternate SSA (38%), targeted therapy (30%), or chemotherapy (23%). Total costs increased on average by $13,272 between the month preceding and following treatment change (p < .001), with the highest increase among patients changing to targeted therapy ($19,677, p < .001) vs. an alternate SSA ($10,240, p < .001) or chemotherapy ($4,057, p = .155). The trajectory in mean cost difference using a 1, 3, and 6-month time period followed an increasing trend for patients who changed to targeted therapy (Δ$19,677, Δ$34,856, Δ$58,387) but was flat for patients who changed to the alternate SSA (Δ$10,240, Δ$10,026, Δ$11,727).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher total healthcare costs were observed following treatment change from first-line SSA. Switching to the alternate SSA was associated with a fixed, one-time cost; whereas, switching to targeted therapy was associated with both an initial switching cost and a persistent monthly increase.

Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of a Novel Combination Regimen in Acromegaly: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

CONTEXT

Combination therapy with somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) plus pegvisomant for patients with acromegaly is recommended after a maximizing dose on monotherapy. Lower-dose combination regimens are not well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare cost-effectiveness and efficacy of 3 lower-dose combination regimens in controlled and uncontrolled acromegaly.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel arm study at a tertiary referral pituitary center.

PATIENTS

Adults with acromegaly regardless of response to prior SRL and biochemical control status at baseline, stratified by an SRL dose required for insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I normalization during any 3-month period within 12 months preceding enrollment.

INTERVENTION

Combination therapy for 24 to 32 weeks on arm A, high-dose SRL (lanreotide 120 mg/octreotide long-acting release [LAR] 30 mg) plus weekly pegvisomant (40-160 mg/week); arm B, low-dose SRL (lanreotide 60 mg/octreotide LAR 10 mg) plus weekly pegvisomant; or arm C, low-dose SRL plus daily pegvisomant (15-60 mg/day).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Monthly treatment cost in each arm in participants completing ≥ 24 weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled and 52 were evaluable. Fifty of 52 (96%) demonstrated IGF-I control regardless of prior SRL responsiveness (arm A, 14/15 [93.3%]; arm B, 22/23 [95.7%]; arm C, 14/14 [100%]). Arm B was least costly (mean, $9837 ± 1375 per month), arm C was most expensive (mean, $22543 ± 11158 per month), and arm A had an intermediate cost (mean, $14261 ± 1645 per month). Approximately 30% of patients required pegvisomant dose uptitration. Rates of adverse events were all < 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose SRL plus weekly pegvisomant represents a novel dosing option for achieving cost-effective, optimal biochemical control in patients with uncontrolled acromegaly requiring combination therapy.

Octreotide long-active release in the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding due to vascular malformations: Cost-effectiveness study

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to vascular malformations has a negative impact on patients´ quality of life and consumes an important quantity of resources.

OBJECTIVE

Analyze the cost-effectiveness of long-active releasing octreotide (OCT-LAR) in the treatment of gastrointestinal haemorrhage secondary to vascular malformations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study, including 19 pacients that were treated with mensual injections of OCTLAR between 2008-2013. The number of blood transfusions, hemoglobin levels, hospital admissions and possible side effects during the year before treatment and the year after the start of the treatment were assessed, and cost-effectiveness was analyzed.

RESULTS

After the beginning of the treatment with OCTLAR, complete response was observed in 7 patients (36.8 %), partial response in 7 patients (36.8 %) and 5 patients (26.3 %) continued to require admissions, blood transfusions and/or endoscopic treatment. We observed significant reduction in the length of admission per year (in days) before and after the start of the treatment (22.79 versus 2.01 days, p < 0.0001) as well as in the number of blood transfusions administered (11.19 versus 2.55 blood transfusions per year, p = 0.002). The mean haemoglobin levels increased from 6.9 g/dl to 10.62 g/dl (p < 0.0001). We observed reduction of costs of 61.5 % between the two periods (from 36,072.35 € to 13,867.57 € per patient and year, p = 0.01). No side effects related to treatment were described.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, OCT-LAR seems to be a costefficient and safe pharmacological treatment of gastrointestinal haemorrhage secondary to vascular malformations, mainly in patients in whom endoscopic or surgical treatment is contraindicated.

[Antidotes--often expensive and not always available]

While there is seldom need for most anti-poisoning agents and antidotes, they should be quickly available, when needed. Local worst-case scenarios, regional staggering of the treatment, and distances must be taken into account at the health care unit level. Hospitals are fairly well equipped with the recommended antidotes. Replenishment of the stocks is complicated by continual disruptions in supply of antidotes. New antidotes in the updated recommendation include calcium folinate (leucovorin) for methanol poisoning and octreotide for the treatment of hypoglycemia caused by intoxications resulting from antidiabetics of the sulfonyl urea group.

An economic evaluation of vasoactive agents used in the United Kingdom for acute bleeding oesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct an economic evaluation of terlipressin, octreotide and placebo in the treatment of bleeding oesophageal varices (BOV) where endotherapy could be used concomitantly.

METHODS

A discrete event simulation model was created with transition states: bleeding, no bleeding, no bleeding post transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, post-salvage surgery, and death. Efficacy data on survival, re-bleeding and control of bleeding were obtained from high quality studies reported in Cochrane meta-analyses. Baseline outcomes related to the course of disease and health-state utilities were derived from published sources. Vasoactive treatment costs and all related BOV costs were obtained from published UK sources.

RESULTS

The average aggregated treatment cost per person for all medical interventions at 1 year was lower for terlipressin-treated patients (2623 pounds sterling) compared with those treated using octreotide (2758 pounds sterling) or placebo (2890 pounds sterling). The incremental analysis comparing terlipressin with octreotide and placebo using a cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and cost per life year gained (LYG) approach indicated that terlipressin was the dominant BOV treatment option (i.e. it cost less and it was more effective). Based on a maximum willingness to pay of 20,000 pounds sterling/QALY terlipressin was more effective and cost-saving compared to octreotide and placebo for simulations ranging from 42 days to 2 years. In point estimation analyses octreotide was dominant compared to placebo; however, probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that octreotide was unlikely to be cost-effective compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicated that vasoactive treatment in BOV was cost-saving compared to no vasoactive treatment. Furthermore, terlipressin was the more cost-effective vasoactive treatment for BOV in cirrhotic patients.

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of emergency endoscopic variceal ligation plus octreotide in the treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients]

OBJECTIVE

To compare and evaluate the cost and effectiveness of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) at emergency plus octreotide versus octreotide alone in the treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with active variceal bleeding under emergency endoscope, were assigned to two groups receiving either combined therapy of EVL at emergency and octreotide ('EVL' group) or a continuous infusion of octreotide alone ('octreotide' group). Both efficacy and cost-effectiveness were observed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in patients' characteristics, supporting treatment or general treatment. In group EVL, there appeared a significantly higher rate in controlling bleeding and lower complication rate than that of octreotide group(94.4% vs.78.6%, P = 0.045 and 19.4% vs. 42.9%, P = 0.027, respectively). Early rebleeding and mortality rate were also lower in group EVL, but with no significant differences between them (2.9% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.358 and 5.6% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.205, respectively). The combined therapy had a significantly shorter time of hemostasis, less administration of octreoid, fewer units of blood transfusion and shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001). The median costs of the combined therapy and octreotide alone were RMB 9046.5 Yuan and 13 743.6 Yuan,respectively (P = 0.045). The cost-effective ratio of group EVL seemed superior to that of octreoid group.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic scheme of emergency EVL plus octreotide was a more cost-effective one for controlling acute esophageal variceal bleeding.

Pro/con debate: octreotide has an important role in the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin?

Whether it is the primary reason for admission or a complication of critical illness, upper gastrointestinal bleeding is commonly encountered in the intensive care unit. In this setting, in the absence of endoscopy, intensivists generally provide supportive care (transfusion of blood products) and acid suppression (such as proton pump inhibitors). More recently, octreotide (a somatostatin analogue) has been used in such patients. However, its precise role in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding is not necessarily clear and the drug is associated with significant costs. In this issue of Critical Care, two expert teams debate the merits of using octreotide in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Bench-to-bedside review: Antidotal treatment of sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycaemia with octreotide

The major potential adverse effect of use of sulfonylurea agents (SUAs) is a hyperinsulinaemic state that causes hypoglycaemia. It may be observed during chronic therapeutic dosing, even with very low doses of a SUA, and especially in older patients. It may also result from accidental or intentional poisoning in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. The traditional approach to SUA-induced hypoglycaemia includes administration of glucose, and glucagon or diazoxide in those who remain hypoglycaemic despite repeated or continuous glucose supplementation. However, these antidotal approaches are associated with several shortcomings, including further exacerbation of insulin release by glucose and glucagon, leading only to a temporary beneficial effect and later relapse into hypoglycaemia, as well as the adverse effects of both glucagon and diazoxide. Octreotide inhibits the secretion of several neuropeptides, including insulin, and has successfully been used to control life-threatening hypoglycaemia caused by insulinoma or persistent hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia of infancy. Therefore, this agent should in theory also be useful to decrease glucose requirements and the number of hypoglycaemic episodes in patients with SUA-induced hypoglycaemia. This has apparently been confirmed by experimental data, one retrospective study based on chart review, and several anecdotal case reports. There is thus a need for further prospective studies, which should be adequately powered, randomized and controlled, to confirm the probable beneficial effect of octreotide in this setting.

Systematic dose-extension of octreotide LAR: the importance of individual tailoring of treatment in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The depot long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide LAR (LAR) provides effective and well-tolerated treatment for acromegaly. Despite a 4-weekly recommended injection frequency, prolonged duration of GH suppression has been observed in some patients following treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogues. The aim of our study was to perform a prospective systematic study to determine whether extending the interval between doses of LAR allows maintenance of 'safe' GH in selected patients with acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients (15 men, seven women), mean age 58.9 years (35-81 years) with active acromegaly (mGH > 5 mU/l), requiring treatment were selected to receive treatment with LAR. Eleven patients had received previous treatment with both transsphenoidal surgery and radiotherapy, while six had received surgery alone. All patients were commenced on treatment with 20 mg LAR intramuscularly (i.m.) every 4 weeks. Mean GH (mGH) was measured after three consecutive injections immediately prior to the fourth injection. The dose frequency was systematically reduced after every four injections if mGH < 5 mU/l. Once mGH > 5 mU/l, the dose frequency was increased and mGH reassessed.

RESULTS

The dosing interval was successfully increased to greater than 4 weeks in 20/22 patients (90.9%). Six of 22 (27.3%) were receiving injections every 8 weeks and 3/22 (13.6%) every 12 weeks. GH and IGF-I were lower on treatment compared with baseline (P < 0.01). There was no difference in individual mGH and IGF-I between the values on 4-weekly dosing and those at final dose frequency. There was no relationship between final dose frequency and either mean GH or IGF-I prior to LAR, patient age, or previous treatment. The percentage suppression following 100 micro g octreotide subcutaneously did not predict subsequent dose frequency of LAR. The drug cost if patients had continued at 4-weekly intervals would be UK pound 187 850, compared with UK pound 101 065 for the individually titrated dose frequency (P < 0.01). This represents a final cost of 53.8% of the 4-weekly injection price.

CONCLUSION

Individual tailoring of LAR administration maintains control of acromegaly, with reduced injection frequency and improved cost-effectiveness.

Somatostatin versus octreotide in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal and pancreatic fistulas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Gastrointestinal and pancreatic fistulas are characterized as serious complications following abdominal surgery, with a reported incidence of up to 27% and 46%, respectively. Fistula formation results in prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity/mortality and increased treatment costs. Conservative and surgical approaches are both employed in the management of these fistulas. The purpose of the present study was to assess, evaluate and compare the potential clinical benefit and cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy (somatostatin versus its analogue octreotide) versus conventional therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:Fifty-one patients with gastrointestinal or pancreatic fistulas were randomized to three treatment groups: 19 patients received 6000 IU/day of somatostatin intravenously, 17 received 100 µg of octreotide three times daily subcutaneously and 15 patients received only standard medical treatment.

RESULTS:The fistula closure rate was 84% in the somatostatin group, 65% in the octreotide group and 27% in the control group. These differences were of statistical significance (P=0.007). Overall mortality rate was less than 5% and statistically significant differences in mortality among the three groups could not be established. Overall, treatment with somatostatin and octreotide was more cost effective than conventional therapy (control group), and somatostatin was more cost effective than octreotide. The average hospital stay was 21.6 days, 27.0 and 31.5 days for the somatostatin, octreotide and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:Data suggest that pharmacotherapy reduces the costs involved in fistula management (by reducing hospitalization) and also offers increased spontaneous closure rate. Further prospective studies focusing on the above parameters are needed to demonstrate the clinicoeconomic benefits.

Optimizing Somatostatin Analog Therapy in Acromegaly

Somatostatin peptide analogs have revolutionized the medical treatment of patients with acromegaly. More recent deep intramuscular depot preparations have further improved control, with consistent suppression of growth hormone secretion and optimal lowering of insulin-like growth factor-1. Effective control of growth hormone should, with long-term use, reduce morbidity and mortality from acromegaly and has been shown to result in partial involution of the pituitary adenoma in the majority of treated patients. The currently available depot formulations allow for an injection frequency of 14 days (lanreotide LA 30mg) to 28 days (octreotide LAR 20mg) according to the manufacturers' recommendations. In clinical practice, dose titration by evaluating a growth hormone day profile prior to the next injection can extend the interval between injection (to 6 or even 8 weeks in certain individuals). This is especially true for octreotide LAR, which also has increased flexibility regarding dosage with a 10 and 30mg preparation. The annual 'drug cost' is broadly similar between the two formulations though the additional expenditure on nurse time and clinic visits incurred by an increased injection frequency is a significant consideration. Decreased injection frequency improves acceptability for the patient without a loss in treatment efficacy. A subjective return of typical acromegalic symptoms, such as sweating and headache, also seem to be useful in predicting the timing of the next injection. Other formulations and doses of lanreotide are currently being evaluated, but more interestingly, newer analogs with greater efficacy at the type 5 somatostatin receptor subtype, and pan-receptor analogs, are being developed. These peptides, in conjunction with the likely availability of a growth hormone receptor blocking agent (pegvisomant), will further expand the medical therapy options for patients with acromegaly.

Treatment of Chinese acromegaly with a combination of bromocriptine and octreotide

BACKGROUND

Good results have been reported with combined use of octreotide and bromocriptine in acromegalic Caucasians. Data concerning the efficacy and tolerability of this combination treatment in Chinese acromegalic patients are scanty.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of combined therapy using bromocriptine and octreotide in the treatment of acromegaly in Chinese patients and to compare the cost-effectiveness of various regimes.

METHODS

Sixteen Chinese acromegalic patients with growth hormone (GH) concentration not suppressible to below 5 mU/L (2 microg/L) during an extended OGTT were recruited to undergo four phases of the study. During the study period, the patients were given bromocriptine alone, bromocriptine and low dose octreotide, bromocriptine and medium dose octreotide, and medium dose octreotide alone. Plasma concentrations of GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) were measured before and after the completion of each phase.

RESULTS

The number of patients reaching target GH concentrations was significantly higher when treated with octreotide compared to baseline (p<0.05). Bromocriptine alone had a significant effect but not to the extent of octreotide alone. A combination of low dose octreotide and bromocriptine is as efficacious in the treatment of acromegaly as high dose octreotide. None of the patients suffered from serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The results confirmed the usefulness and tolerability of bromocriptine and octreotide in Chinese acromegalics. The most cost-effective regime in this study was a combination of low dose octreotide and bromocriptine.

Octreotide in the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding caused by angiodysplasia in two patients with von Willebrand's disease

Two cases of von Willebrand's disease and angiodysplasia with intractable gastrointestinal bleeding are presented. Replacement therapy with cryoprecipitate and variable purity von Willebrand factor (VWF) was ineffective, as were other treatments including steroids, immunoglobulin and hormonal replacement. Both patients required massive blood transfusion and product support. The efficacy of somatostatin and an analogue is described. In one patient, we observed a rise in von Willebrand factor activity after octreotide infusion.

Economic evaluation of the use of octreotide for prevention of complications following pancreatic resection

Recent studies have concluded that octreotide can prevent complications in patients undergoing pancreatic resections. Given the acquisition cost of octreotide, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to establish whether if the additional cost associated with its use was justified by a decrease in the consumption of other resources. To evaluate success rates and complication rates, a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials was conducted. The rates for pancreatic fistula and fluid collection were 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9 to 13.4) and 3.6% (95% CI 1.9 to 5.2) for octreotide vs. 23.4% (95% CI 19.7 to 27. 1) and 8.8% (95% CI 6.2 to 11.3) for placebo. In a second phase we evaluated the treatment cost for patients with and without complications using two different models of cost savings. In the first model the cost to treat a pancreatic fistula was calculated as the per diem rate (as determined by Statistics Canada) multiplied by the incremental length of stay associated with the complication. In the second model we used data from institutions participating in the Ontario Case Costing Project. In model 1 the estimated incremental length of hospital stay attributed to a pancreatic fistula was 7 days, based on a review of the literature, and the per diem was $552. In model 2 the average cost of care for patients with or without complication was $32,347 (n = 17; 95% CI $20,882 to $43,812) and $11, 169 (n = 18; 95% CI $7558 to $14,779), respectively. The data suggest that when compared to placebo, octreotide is a dominant treatment strategy. In model 1, in a cohort of 100 patients, octreotide saved an average of $853 per patient while allowing 16 incremental patients to avoid complications. In model 2 use of octreotide resulted in an average savings of $1642 per patient while still allowing 16 patients to avoid complications. Detailed one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses suggest that both models were robust. The use of octreotide is a cost-effective strategy in patients undergoing elective pancreatic resection. Consideration should be given to extending its use to patients who are at high risk for development of complications following pancreatic surgery and who do not have any contraindications to the use of this drug.

The cost-effectiveness of octreotide acetate in the treatment of carcinoid syndrome and VIPoma

Markov modeling was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of octreotide in treating carcinoid syndrome and VIPoma. For each condition, using octreotide was associated with doubled survival time. Octreotide was cost-effective for treating carcinoid tumor ($752 per additional year of life, two additional years on average), and cost saving for VIPoma.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy

We analyzed the results of conventional imaging and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in 150 patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

The outcomes of combinations of imaging modalities were compared in terms of tumor localization, effect on patient management and financial costs.

RESULTS

In patients with carcinoids, a combination of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, chest radiograph and ultrasound of the upper abdomen had a high sensitivity for tumor localization, and detected lesions in patients in whom no tumor was found with conventional imaging, justifying the greater cost. In patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy adds little to the information obtained with conventional imaging and therefore should not be used as a screening method. In patients with paraganglioma, CT scanning of the region where a paraganglioma is suspected, followed by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy to detect multicentricity has the best cost effectiveness ratio. In patients with gastrinomas, the combination of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT scanning of the upper abdomen had the highest sensitivity. The relatively high cost of this process is outweighed by its demonstrating a resectable tumor. In patients with insulinomas, the highest yield against the lowest cost is obtained if somatostatin receptor scintigraphy is only performed if CT scanning fails to demonstrate the tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy should be performed in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma because it can lead to a change of stage and may demonstrate otherwise undetected brain metastases. The cost increase is outweighed by the omission of unnecessary treatment for some of the patients and by the possibility of irradiating brain metastases at an early stage, which may lead to a better quality of life.

Acromegaly Therapy Consensus Development Panel. Consensus statement: benefits versus risks of medical therapy for acromegaly

A consensus panel defined the risks and benefits of medical management of acromegaly and determined a place for the use of the somatostatin analogue, octreotide, in the overall management strategy of patients with acromegaly. Octreotide was considered effective in managing acromegaly, and its role as an adjuvant to surgery was defined. Octreotide is beneficial to radiotherapy-treated patients in that the drug suppresses growth hormone (GH) secretion until the long-term effects of radiation occur. Complications associated with octreotide are minor relative to the benefits, but requirements for multiple daily injections and drug cost are drawbacks. Approximately 20% to 30% of octreotide-treated acromegalic patients develop gallstones or sludge, which are usually asymptomatic and require no treatment. Surgery continues to be the principal therapeutic approach for GH-secreting pituitary tumors, and improved octreotide delivery methods and second-generation analogues will provide further advantages for pharmacotherapy.

Octreotide versus terlypressin in acute variceal hemorrhage in liver cirrhosis. Emergency control and prevention of early rebleeding

Sixty patients with endoscopically confirmed active variceal bleeding entered a randomized controlled clinical trial aimed at comparing the efficacy of octreotide vs. terlypressin in the control of acute variceal hemorrhage (period I, 24 h) and in the prevention of early rebleeding (period II, 6 days). Of the sixty 30 received octreotide (period I, 100 micrograms bolus followed by continuous intravenous infusion at 25 micrograms/h; period II, 100 micrograms t.i.d. subcutaneously), and 30 received terlypressin (period I, 2 mg intravenous bolus every 4 h; period II, 2nd day, 2 mg every 6 h; from 3th to 7th days, 1 mg every 6 h). Control of bleeding was achieved in 23 (76.6%) patients receiving octreotide and in 16 (53%) treated with terlypressin (NS); none of these patients suffered rebleeding during treatment. No significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups during the hospitalization period. Complications due to therapy were lower with octreotide than with terlypressin (P < 0.01). Under the same effectiveness conditions the cost/benefit ratio must be taken into account.