1
|
Grottoli S, Maffei P, Tresoldi AS, Granato S, Benedan L, Mariani P, Giustina A. Insights from an Italian Delphi panel: exploring resistance to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands and guiding second-line medical therapies in acromegaly management. J Endocrinol Invest 2024:10.1007/s40618-024-02386-3. [PMID: 38809458 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-024-02386-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE First-line medical therapy for acromegaly management includes first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs), but resistance limits their use. Despite international guidelines, the choice of second-line therapy is debated. METHODS We aim to discuss resistance to fgSRLs, identify second-line therapy determinants and assess glycemia's impact to provide valuable insights for acromegaly management in clinical practice. A group of Italian endocrinologists expert in the pituitary field participated in a two-round Delphi panel between July and September 2023. The Delphi questionnaire encompassed a total of 75 statements categorized into three sections: resistance to fgSRLs therapy and predictors of response; determinants for the selection of second-line therapy; the role of glycemia in the therapeutic management. The statements were rated on a 6-point Likert scale. RESULTS Fifty-nine (79%) statements reached a consensus. IGF-1 levels resulted central for evaluating resistance to fgSRLs, that should be defined considering also symptomatic clinical response, degree of tumor shrinkage and complications, using clinician- and patient-reported outcome tools available. Factors to be evaluated for the choice of second-line medical therapy are hyperglycemia-that should be managed as in non-acromegalic patients-tumor remnant, resistant headache and compliance. Costs do not represent a main determinant in the choice of second-line medical treatment. CONCLUSION The experts agreed on a holistic management approach to acromegaly. It is therefore necessary to choose currently available highly effective second-line medical treatment (pegvisomant and pasireotide) based on the characteristics of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Grottoli
- Department of Medical Science, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - P Maffei
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), 3rd Medical Clinic, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | | | - S Granato
- Medical Department, Pfizer Italia, Rome, Italy
| | - L Benedan
- Università Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - P Mariani
- Università Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - A Giustina
- Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sawicka-Gutaj N, Derwich-Rudowicz A, Biczysko A, Turchyn S, Ziółkowska P, Ziemnicka K, Gut P, Nijakowski K, Ruchała M. Serum Phosphorus and Calcium as Biomarkers of Disease Status in Acromegaly. Biomedicines 2023; 11:3278. [PMID: 38137499 PMCID: PMC10741545 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11123278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Acromegaly is a chronic disease caused by the hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH), leading to changes in the growth of visceral tissues and glucose impairment. Serum biomarkers that correlate with disease status are still unclear. This study aims to assess the potential of phosphorus and calcium as biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of patients with acromegaly and clarify their relationship with SAGIT and other common biomarkers. We retrospectively analyzed data from 306 medical records of patients with acromegaly hospitalized between 2015 and 2020. Factors such as patient biometrics, duration of disease, SAGIT score, tumor size, GH, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), calcium, phosphorus, parathormone, and vitamin D were analyzed concerning current disease status (naïve, non-remission, remission). The results showed that serum phosphorus significantly correlated with IGF-1 and SAGIT scores for patients with active acromegaly. Specifically, the best predictor for the remission of acromegaly was a phosphorus level < 3.98 mg/dL and serum calcium levels < 9.88 mg/dL. Based on logistic regression, the higher the serum phosphorus level, the lower the odds of achieving remission (an increase in one unit leads to a decrease in the chance of about 80%). In conclusion, phosphorus and calcium can be effective biochemical markers for predicting disease status in acromegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Sawicka-Gutaj
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Derwich-Rudowicz
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Biczysko
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| | - Solomiya Turchyn
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| | - Paulina Ziółkowska
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Ziemnicka
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| | - Paweł Gut
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| | - Kacper Nijakowski
- Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-812 Poznan, Poland
| | - Marek Ruchała
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Trigt VR, Pelsma ICM, Biermasz NR. Patient-reported outcomes in refractory hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: an unmet need. Pituitary 2023:10.1007/s11102-023-01309-4. [PMID: 37014498 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-023-01309-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe quality and outcomes of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) used in patients with refractory hormone-producing pituitary adenomas, and to provide an overview of PROs in these challenging pituitary adenomas. METHODS Three databases were searched for studies reporting on refractory pituitary adenomas. For the purpose of this review, refractory adenomas were defined as tumors resistant to primary therapy. General risk of bias was assessed using a component approach and the quality of PROM reporting was assessed using the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) criteria. RESULTS 20 studies reported on PROMs in refractory pituitary adenomas, using 14 different PROMs, of which 4 were disease specific (median general risk of bias score: 33.5% (range 6-50%) and ISOQOL score: 46% (range 29-62%)). SF-36/RAND-36 and AcroQoL were most frequently used. Health-related quality of life in refractory patients (measured by AcroQoL, SF-36/Rand-36, Tuebingen CD-25, and EQ-5D-5L) varied greatly across studies, and was not always impaired compared to patients in remission. CONCLUSION There is a scarcity of data on PROs in the subset of pituitary adenomas that is more difficult to treat, e.g., refractory and these patients are difficult to isolate from the total cohort. The patients' perspective on quality of life, therefore, remains largely unknown in refractory patients. Thus, PROs in refractory pituitary adenomas require adequate analysis using properly reported disease specific PROMs in large cohorts to enable appropriate interpretation for use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria R van Trigt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Iris C M Pelsma
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke R Biermasz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The potential utility of the SAGIT instrument in the clinical assessment of patients with acromegaly, a large single-centre study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:3286. [PMID: 36841880 PMCID: PMC9968276 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29957-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
Abstract
SAGIT is an instrument created for the clinical assessment of acromegaly. Our objective was to test the usefulness of this tool in assessing disease activity of acromegalic patients in a single centre of Poznan, Poland using a retrospective study. Medical records of patients with acromegaly hospitalised at the Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine of Poznan University of Medical Sciences in Poland between January 2015 and December 2020 were analysed. SAGIT scores were assessed according to each patient's clinical and biochemical data. The results show that SAGIT scores were higher in treatment-naïve patients and the lowest in controlled patients. There were positive correlations between SAGIT scores and concentrations of calcium, phosphorus, HbA1C levels, and tumour invasiveness at the time of diagnosis. However, parameters such as age, vitamin D concentration, and time from diagnosis showed an inverse relationship with the SAGIT score. In ROC curve analysis, SAGIT scores of 5 or less discriminated controlled patients from uncontrolled (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 76.7%, specificity 78.5%, AUC 0.867). Also, SAGIT higher than 6 indicated for treatment start or escalation (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 80.88%, specificity 77.59%, AUC 0.866). Lack of signs and symptoms (S = 0) could not discriminate between controlled and uncontrolled disease, but predicted therapy maintenance (p < 0.0004, sensitivity 59.5%, specificity 58.2%, AUC 0.604). In conclusion, The SAGIT instrument is easy to use even when completed in the retrospective medical record review. It can be useful for distinguishing clinical stages of acromegaly and in decision-making.
Collapse
|
5
|
Coopmans EC, Andela CD, Claessen KMJA, Biermasz NR. Evaluating the Impact of Acromegaly on Quality of Life. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2022; 51:709-725. [PMID: 36244688 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecl.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Acromegaly has a substantial negative impact on quality of life (QoL). This review aims to discuss the impact of acromegaly on QoL from the clinical perspective as well as from the patient perspective. Furthermore, it aims to evaluate the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in acromegaly and how PROMs aid decision-making. The recommendations presented in this review are based on recent clinical evidence on the impact of acromegaly on QoL combined with the authors' own clinical experience treating patients with acromegaly. We recommend that a patient-centered approach should be considered in treatment decisions, integrating conventional biochemical outcomes, tumor control, comorbidities, treatment complications, and PROMs, including QoL measures. This more integrated approach seems effective in treating comorbidities and improving patient-reported outcomes and is critical, as many patients do not achieve biochemical or tumor control and comorbidities, impairment in QoL may not remit even when full biochemical control is achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva C Coopmans
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Center for Pituitary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZB Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Cornelie D Andela
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Center for Pituitary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZB Leiden, the Netherlands; Basalt Rehabilitation Center, Vrederustlaan 180, 2543 SW Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - Kim M J A Claessen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Center for Pituitary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke R Biermasz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Center for Pituitary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZB Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shimon I, Adnan Z, Hirsch D, Duskin-Bitan H, Akirov A. Subclinical acromegaly: to treat or not to treat? Endocr J 2022; 69:1323-1328. [PMID: 35732439 DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.ej22-0066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with acromegaly usually present with the classical signs of acromegaly, whereas patients without the specific signs or symptoms are rarely diagnosed. This unique entity can be named "subclinical acromegaly". This was a retrospective study. Our study group consisted of 6 patients (4 females) with incidentally diagnosed acromegaly, most following head MRI for unrelated reasons and without the specific signs of acromegaly. Mean age at diagnosis was 48.8 ± 19.2 years. Baseline IGF-1 ranged between 1.3-2.0 × upper limit of normal (ULN). MRI depicted a pituitary microadenoma in 5 patients, and one patient presented with a 12 mm intra-sellar macroadenoma. Mean calculated SAGIT clinical score was 4.8. Three patients underwent trans-sphenoidal resection; two achieved hormonal remission and one improved but did not normalize IGF-1 following surgery. Four patients (including one following surgery) were given somatostatin analogs, and three normalized IGF-1. Several patients improved clinically following treatment, reporting improvement in snoring, hypertension, or weight loss, and pituitary adenoma decreased in size in 2 patients that responded to medical treatment. We report a series of 6 patients with very mild and subclinical acromegaly. It is uncertain whether all such patients will gain clinical benefit from treatment, but most experienced clinical improvement due to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilan Shimon
- Institute of Endocrinology, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva 4941492, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Zaina Adnan
- Zvulun Medical Center, Clalit Medical Services, Kiryat Bialik 2706716, Israel
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Sefad 1311502, Israel
| | - Dania Hirsch
- Institute of Endocrinology, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva 4941492, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Hadar Duskin-Bitan
- Institute of Endocrinology, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva 4941492, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Amit Akirov
- Institute of Endocrinology, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva 4941492, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Herman R, Janež A, Goričar K, Rizzo M, Jensterle M. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Disease Control Status and Quality of Life of Patients with Acromegaly. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58121711. [PMID: 36556914 PMCID: PMC9783534 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Despite the best efforts of healthcare workers and the deployment of alternative healthcare delivery solutions through telemedicine, the pandemic has disrupted standard care for patients with chronic conditions. The long-lasting pandemic has also had a profound impact on the quality of life (QoL) of the majority of patients with chronic illnesses. The management of rare diseases has been particularly challenging. We aimed to evaluate the impacts that the long-lasting pandemic had on the disease control status and QoL in patients with acromegaly. Materials and Methods: Our prospective study included 34 patients from a national referral centre. The baseline SAGIT and AcroQoL results were obtained in October 2020 during the lockdown period of the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. The follow-up results were assessed during the summer of 2022 in a period without any public health restrictions. All the patients were additionally evaluated for their attitude towards preventative public health measures against SARS-CoV2 spread and required mask wearing during the pandemic. Results: By comparing assessments in 2020 during the lockdown period and 2022 post-lockdown, we observed some improvement in SAGIT subscores T and I, most likely reflecting treatment changes in a small number of patients. The global SAGIT score remained stable. QoL measurement by AcroQoL did not demonstrate any changes. There was a negative correlation between SAGIT subscore S and the AcroQoL results. We also noted that the group of patients with the most negative attitude toward public health measurements for preventing SARS-CoV2 spread had higher AcroQoL results than others. Conclusion: Our results showcase that the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, lasting over two years, did not impact the disease control status and QoL in patients with acromegaly. The cohort continued to be well controlled and without changes in QoL. We measured a relatively favourable attitude towards the public health measures to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV2; in particular, patients who had a lower QoL had more positive attitudes towards these measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rok Herman
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Andrej Janež
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Katja Goričar
- Pharmacogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Manfredi Rizzo
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Promise), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Mojca Jensterle
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +386-31-312-977
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Camerini S, Wennberg A, Adriani M, Martin B, Vettor R, Maffei P, Dassie F. Questionnaire and tools: clinical powerful instrument in acromegaly diagnosis and management. J Endocrinol Invest 2022; 45:1823-1834. [PMID: 35322391 PMCID: PMC9463243 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-01782-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Acromegaly is a rare chronic disease characterized by systemic comorbidity and reduced quality of life. Although achieving biochemical control has always been the primary goal of acromegaly therapy, recent evidence has shown that the traditional assessment does not adequately capture the complexity of symptoms and patients' perception. These findings result in the need to improve a fast decision-making process of the clinician, who should not only take into account biochemical-instrumental criteria, but also patients' symptoms. With the aim of supporting the clinician in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process several disease-specific tools have been developed. The aim of this review is to provide a description of the acromegaly-specific tools, presenting their main features, their application in daily practice, and their efficacy and utility. METHODS A systematic search of Medline/PubMed, ISI-Web of Knowledge, and Google Scholar databases was done. RESULTS Specific instruments and questionnaires have recently been developed to assist clinicians in the assessment of acromegaly. These are either Patient-Reported Outcome tools, such as Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL) and Pain Assessment Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ), or Clinician-Reported Outcome tools, such as ACROSCORE, SAGIT® and Acromegaly Disease Activity Tool (ACRODAT®). Such tools are extremely flexible and, therefore, have been widely adopted by endocrinologists and other professionals, so much so that they have also been included as recommendations in the 2018 international guidelines. CONCLUSION Questionnaires and tools are useful in the management of acromegaly patients. They help clinicians evaluate patients' symptoms and could assist in the evaluation of disease activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Camerini
- DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - A Wennberg
- Unit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Adriani
- DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - B Martin
- DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - R Vettor
- DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - P Maffei
- DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - F Dassie
- DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maione L, Albrici C, Grunenwald S, Mouly C, Cimino V, Lecoq AL, Souberbielle JC, Caron P, Chanson P. IGF-I Variability Over Repeated Measures in Patients With Acromegaly Under Long-Acting Somatostatin Receptor Ligands. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:e3644-e3653. [PMID: 35772775 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT In patients with acromegaly on long-term treatment with long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), the time of blood collection for IGF-I measurement after injection is not well defined. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess serum IGF-I dynamics and variability in SRL-treated patients compared with surgically cured patients and healthy controls. METHODS Thirty patients under SRLs considered controlled based on a normal previous IGF-I level, 10 patients cured by pituitary surgery, and 7 healthy subjects underwent 4 weekly IGF-I determinations. RESULTS In SRL-treated patients, the IGF-I SDS (mean ± SD) was higher just before injection (0.34 ± 0.66) than at Day 7 (-0.33 ± 0.61; P = 0.0041) and Day 14 (-0.23 ± 0.60; P = 0.047) after injection, but it did not significantly vary in cured patients and healthy controls. The IGF-I CV was higher in SRL-treated patients than in cured patients or healthy controls (14.4 ± 7.6% vs 7.9 ± 4.4% and 8.3 ± 3.2%, respectively; P < 0.05 for both). Among SRL-treated patients, IGF-I CV was higher in "nonoptimally controlled patients"-i.e., patients with at least one elevated IGF-I value out of 4 (n = 9) compared with "optimally controlled" patients for whom all 4 IGF-I SDS values were < 2.0 (21.3 ± 9.3 vs 11.6 ± 6.0%; P = 0.0019). The latter did not differ from surgically cured patients and healthy controls. The measurement at the farthest distance from the SRL injection was the most predictive of patients with nonoptimally controlled disease. CONCLUSION In patients treated with long-acting SRLs, IGF-I sampling at the farthest distance from SRL injection is the most informative and best predictor of optimal disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Maione
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie et Physiopathologie Endocriniennes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Cristina Albrici
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie et Physiopathologie Endocriniennes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Solange Grunenwald
- Service d'Endocrinologie et Maladies métaboliques, Pôle Cardio-Vasculaire et Métabolique, CHU Larrey, 31059 Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Céline Mouly
- Service d'Endocrinologie et Maladies métaboliques, Pôle Cardio-Vasculaire et Métabolique, CHU Larrey, 31059 Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Vincenzo Cimino
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie et Physiopathologie Endocriniennes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Anne-Lise Lecoq
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie et Physiopathologie Endocriniennes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Jean Claude Souberbielle
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Département de Physiologie, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Caron
- Service d'Endocrinologie et Maladies métaboliques, Pôle Cardio-Vasculaire et Métabolique, CHU Larrey, 31059 Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Philippe Chanson
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie et Physiopathologie Endocriniennes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bone metabolic indices: Promising predictors for assessing acromegaly. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 99:239-243. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
11
|
van der Meulen M, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Broersen LHA, Schoones JW, Pereira AM, van Furth WR, Claessen KMJA, Biermasz NR. State of the Art of Patient-reported Outcomes in Acromegaly or GH Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:1225-1238. [PMID: 34871425 PMCID: PMC9016456 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Insight into the current landscape of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROM) and differences between PROs and conventional biochemical outcomes is pivotal for future implementation of PROs in research and clinical practice. Therefore, in studies among patients with acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD), we evaluated (1) used PROMs, (2) their validity, (3) quality of PRO reporting, (4) agreement between PROs and biochemical outcomes, and (5) determinants of discrepancies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched 8 electronic databases for prospective studies describing both PROs and biochemical outcomes in acromegaly and GHD patients. Quality of PRO reporting was assessed using the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) criteria. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate determinants. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Ninety studies were included (acromegaly: n = 53; GHD: n = 37). Besides nonvalidated symptom lists (used in 37% of studies), 36 formal PROMs were used [predominantly Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire in acromegaly (43%) and Quality of Life-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults in GHD (43%)]. Reporting of PROs was poor, with a median of 37% to 47% of ISOQOL items being reported per study. Eighteen (34%) acromegaly studies and 12 (32%) GHD studies reported discrepancies between PROs and biochemical outcomes, most often improvement in biochemical outcomes without change in PROs. CONCLUSIONS Prospective studies among patients with acromegaly and GHD use a multitude of PROMs, often poorly reported. Since a substantial proportion of studies report discrepancies between PROs and biochemical outcomes, PROMs are pivotal in the evaluation of disease activity. Therefore, harmonization of PROs in clinical practice and research by development of core outcome sets is an important unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel van der Meulen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Correspondence: Merel van der Meulen, BSc, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Haaglanden Medical Centre and Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden and The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie H A Broersen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto M Pereira
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter R van Furth
- University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Haaglanden Medical Centre and Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden and The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Kim M J A Claessen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke R Biermasz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Herman R, Goričar K, Janež A, Jensterle M. Clinical Applicability of Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcome Tools in the Management of Patients with Acromegaly. Endocr Pract 2022; 28:678-683. [PMID: 35421593 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess treatment outcomes and disease control status in patients with acromegaly by patient- and clinician-reported outcome tools and to analyse correlations among different components of both tools. METHODS Cross-sectional study included 72 patients from the national referral centre with a median follow up of 8 (5-12) years. Baseline SAGIT at the diagnosis was determined retrospectively, while the follow up SAGIT and AcroQoL results were assessed at the most recent visit and by additional telephone interviews. RESULTS All SAGIT subscores significantly lowered from baseline to follow up (global score from 14 to 4 (P<0.001)). SAGIT at baseline did not discriminate the current disease control status. However, higher baseline SAGIT score and subscore T were associated with uncontrolled disease after the first-line treatment. Diagnostic delay correlated with baseline S, A, G, and global SAGIT scores. At follow up, global SAGIT score discriminated between cured/controlled and uncontrolled groups (4 vs. 6 (P=0.007)). AcroQoL score was 69.3, with »Personal relations subscale« being the least and »Physical scale« the most affected. There was no difference in AcroQoL between patients classified as uncontrolled or cured/controlled. At baseline and follow up, there were significant negative correlations between S and A subscores and AcroQoL. Higher BMI, presence of swelling, joint symptoms, headaches, sleep apnea, and hypertension significantly impaired QoL. CONCLUSION Our results emphasised the complementary nature of patient- and clinician-reported outcome tools in acromegaly management. We identified modifiable signs, symptoms, and comorbidities as treatment targets that might help clinicians improve QoL in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rok Herman
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
| | - Katja Goričar
- Pharmacogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
| | - Andrej Janež
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
| | - Mojca Jensterle
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bolanowski M, Adnan Z, Doknic M, Guk M, Hána V, Ilovayskaya I, Kastelan D, Kocjan T, Kužma M, Nurbekova A, Poiana C, Szücs N, Vandeva S, Gomez R, Paidac S, Simoneau D, Shimon I. Acromegaly: Clinical Care in Central and Eastern Europe, Israel, and Kazakhstan. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:816426. [PMID: 35273565 PMCID: PMC8902495 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.816426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Acromegaly is a rare condition typically caused by benign pituitary adenomas, resulting in excessive production of growth hormone. Clinical manifestations of acromegaly are diverse, varying from the overgrowth of body tissue to cardiovascular, metabolic, and osteoarticular disorders. Symptoms may emerge slowly, overlapping with other diseases and often involve many different healthcare specialists. In the last decade, efforts to provide an accurate and timely diagnosis of acromegaly have improved disease management and clinical experience. Despite this progress, marked differences in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of acromegaly exist from country-to-country. To address these inconsistencies in the region comprising Central and Eastern Europe, Israel, and Kazakhstan, a panel of acromegaly experts from 13 of these countries was convened. Acromegaly experts from each country provided available information on the approaches from their country, including regional treatment centers and multidisciplinary teams, treatment access, reimbursement and availability, and physician education, disease awareness, and patient advocacy. Across several areas of acromegaly management, divergent approaches were identified and discussed, including the provision of multidisciplinary care, approved and available treatments, and disease awareness programs. These were recognized as areas of potential improvement in the management of acromegaly, in addition to participation in national and regional acromegaly registries. Further experience exchange will facilitate the identification of specific strategies that can be adapted in each country, and widespread participation in acromegaly registries will enable their evaluation. It is anticipated that this approach will support the optimization of acromegaly patient care across this region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Bolanowski
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Isotope Therapy, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- *Correspondence: Marek Bolanowski, ; Zaina Adnan,
| | - Zaina Adnan
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Bar Ilan Faculty of Medicine, Clalit Medical Health Care Services, Safed, Israel
- *Correspondence: Marek Bolanowski, ; Zaina Adnan,
| | - Mirjana Doknic
- Neuroendocrinology Department, Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Medical Faculty University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Mykola Guk
- Department of Transsphenoidal Surgery, Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Václav Hána
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Irena Ilovayskaya
- Neuroendocrine Unit, Endocrinology Department, Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Darko Kastelan
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Tomaz Kocjan
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Martin Kužma
- Comenius University Faculty of Medicine, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | - Catalina Poiana
- Department of Endocrinology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nikolette Szücs
- Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Silvia Vandeva
- Department of Endocrinology, Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Endocrinology, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Roy Gomez
- Global Medical Affairs, Pfizer Rare Disease, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sorin Paidac
- Medical Affairs, Pfizer Rare Disease, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Damien Simoneau
- Central and Eastern Europe Medical Affairs, Pfizer Rare Disease, Paris, France
| | - Ilan Shimon
- Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alzajaji QB, Alidrisi HA, Mansour AA. Correlation Between Clinical and Biochemical Markers in Patients With Acromegaly on Different Modalities of Treatment. Cureus 2021; 13:e19438. [PMID: 34909342 PMCID: PMC8663996 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acromegaly is a disabling disease caused by growth hormone (GH) over-secretion, associated with increased morbidity and mortality through different metabolic and somatic consequences involving soft tissue, acral overgrowth, and skin thickening, which will lead to different clinical manifestations. The study aimed to assess the correlation between biochemical markers of acromegaly with different clinical findings and biochemical control with the clinical findings. Methods A cross-sectional study was done on 56 patients with acromegaly attending a tertiary center for diabetes, endocrine, and metabolism in Southern Iraq Basrah. They were 32 (57.1%) males. Fatigue, headache, excessive sweating, joint pain, backache, soft tissue swelling, numbness, snoring, and visual problems were assessed on a four-point Likert scale. In addition, biochemical dynamic GH testing was done using a five-point random GH curve and/or standard GH suppression under the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Results No significant correlation was found between symptoms severity and five-point GH parameters in respect of mean, peak, and nadir. Only backache showed a significant correlation with GH under OGTT suppression parameters in respect to mean, peak, and nadir (P-values < 0.01, < 0.01, and < 0.01), respectively. No particular biochemical control cut-off value in the 9 am random GH, mean five-point GH curve, or nadir GH under OGTT was correlated with the degree of severity for any of the clinical symptoms, as there was no difference between the biochemically controlled and uncontrolled groups in respect to any of the clinical symptom’s severity scale. Conclusion Only backache correlated with the biochemical tests of disease activity in the form of GH under OGTT. It appears in this study that the severity of the clinical symptoms does not correlate with biochemical control so that thorough evaluation and treatment of clinical complaints besides biochemical control is an essential part of the management plan in patients with acromegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qusay Baqer Alzajaji
- Diabetes and Endocrinology, Faiha Specialized Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism Center (FDEMC), Basrah, IRQ.,Internal Medicine, University of Basrah, Basrah, IRQ
| | - Haider A Alidrisi
- Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Basrah College of Medicine, Basrah, IRQ
| | - Abbas A Mansour
- Diabetes and Endocrinology, Faiha Specialized Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism Center (FDEMC) University of Basrah, Basrah, IRQ
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Giustina A, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, Petersenn S, Casanueva FF, Sert C, Houchard A, Melmed S. International Multicenter Validation Study of the SAGIT® Instrument in Acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106:3555-3568. [PMID: 34313752 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The SAGIT® instrument (SAGIT) has been developed to enable accurate characterization of acromegaly disease activity. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the ability of SAGIT to discriminate acromegaly disease control status. METHODS This multicenter, noninterventional, prospective and retrospective, longitudinal study, conducted at academic and private clinical practice sites, included patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of controlled (n = 109) or non-controlled (n = 105) acromegaly, assessed by clinical global evaluation of disease control (CGE-DC) questionnaire, investigator therapeutic decision, and international guidelines. Control status was not determined at baseline for 13 patients. Since 9 patients were enrolled retrospectively, all presented analyses are based on the prospective population (N = 227). Patients were assessed over a 2-year follow-up period. Classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed to investigate how SAGIT components at baseline (signs/symptoms [S], associated comorbidities [A], growth hormone levels [G], insulin-like growth factor 1 levels [I], tumor features [T]) discriminate between controlled and non-controlled acromegaly. RESULTS Baseline mean subscores S, G, I, and T were significantly lower in patients with CGE-DC controlled vs CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly. SAGIT components I and G for CGE-DC and S, A, G, I, and T for the clinician's therapeutic decision were retained by CART analyses. For international guidelines, only SAGIT component I was retained. The risk for undergoing ≥ 1 treatment change during the study was 3.44 times greater for CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly relative to CGE-DC controlled acromegaly. CONCLUSION The SAGIT instrument is a valid and sensitive tool to comprehensively and accurately assess acromegaly severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giustina
- Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello D Bronstein
- Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Philippe Chanson
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie et Physiopathologie Endocriniennes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Felipe F Casanueva
- Instituto Salud Carlos III, 15706 Santiago de Compostela University - CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | - Shlomo Melmed
- Pituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Varlamov EV, Niculescu DA, Banskota S, Galoiu SA, Poiana C, Fleseriu M. Clinical features and complications of acromegaly at diagnosis are not all the same: data from two large referral centers. Endocr Connect 2021; 10:731-741. [PMID: 34097642 PMCID: PMC8284952 DOI: 10.1530/ec-21-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of international acromegaly related registries is increasing; however, heterogeneity of acromegaly symptoms and signs across countries is not well described. We compared clinical disease manifestations at diagnosis between two large University referral centers from two continents. METHODS Retrospective, comparative epidemiological study of acromegaly patients at two centers: (i) C. I. Parhon National Institute of Endocrinology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania (Parhon), and (ii) Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States (OHSU) from approved data repositories was undertaken. Data were extracted from medical charts and questionnaires. Binary logistic regression analysis was undertaken for the most frequently noted symptoms and clinical signs. RESULTS The study included 216 patients (87 Parhon, 129 OHSU). Age, sex, and median delay in diagnosis were similar between centers. IGF-1 index was higher in patients at Parhon (3.3 vs 2.1, P < 0.001). The top five symptoms at both centers were enlarged hands/feet, headache, arthralgia, fatigue, and irregular menses in women. A significant difference was noted for multiple signs and symptoms frequency, often > 20 percentage points between centers. Center was a predictor of many signs and symptoms, independent of acromegaly biochemical severity or disease duration. CONCLUSION We show in the first comparative study that differences in medical practice, documentation, and likely cultural differences can influence patients' symptom(s) reporting and screening patterns in geographically different populations. Pooling data into large multicenter international registry databases may lead to loss of regional characteristics and thus a mixed overall picture of combined cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena V Varlamov
- Department of Medicine (Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Dan Alexandru Niculescu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Swechya Banskota
- Department of Medicine (Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Simona Andreea Galoiu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Catalina Poiana
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Maria Fleseriu
- Department of Medicine (Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Correspondence should be addressed to M Fleseriu:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
GH/IGF-1 Abnormalities and Muscle Impairment: From Basic Research to Clinical Practice. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22010415. [PMID: 33401779 PMCID: PMC7795003 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The impairment of skeletal muscle function is one of the most debilitating least understood co-morbidity that accompanies acromegaly (ACRO). Despite being one of the major determinants of these patients’ poor quality of life, there is limited evidence related to the underlying mechanisms and treatment options. Although growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels are associated, albeit not indisputable, with the presence and severity of ACRO myopathies the precise effects attributed to increased GH or IGF-1 levels are still unclear. Yet, cell lines and animal models can help us bridge these gaps. This review aims to describe the evidence regarding the role of GH and IGF-1 in muscle anabolism, from the basic to the clinical setting with special emphasis on ACRO. We also pinpoint future perspectives and research lines that should be considered for improving our knowledge in the field.
Collapse
|
18
|
Fleseriu M, Fogelfeld L, Gordon MB, Sisco J, Crosby RD, Ludlam WH, Haviv A, Mathias SD. An evaluation of the Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (Acro-TSQ) in adult patients with acromegaly, including correlations with other patient-reported outcome measures: data from two large multicenter international studies. Pituitary 2020; 23:347-358. [PMID: 32221764 PMCID: PMC7316852 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-020-01038-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (Acro-TSQ) is a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for patients with acromegaly receiving injectable somatostatin analogs (SSAs) to assess clinical symptoms and adverse drug reaction interference, treatment satisfaction, and convenience. We evaluated its scale structure, reliability, validity, responsiveness, and what constitutes clinically meaningful change. METHODS Data from two longitudinal studies (N = 79 and 82) of patients receiving a stable injectable SSA dose for ≥ 6 months who completed the Acro-TSQ and other collateral measures (e.g., AcroQoL, AIS, WPAI:SHP, EQ-5D-5L) were analyzed. RESULTS The first study demonstrated internal consistency of the Acro-TSQ. However, several items had high ceiling effects, responsiveness could not be established, and the minimally important difference (MID) was not estimable. In the second study, factor analysis revealed six scales: Symptom Interference, Treatment Convenience, Injection Site Interference, GI Interference, Treatment Satisfaction, and Emotional Reaction. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were confirmed; most scales demonstrated significant differences in mean scores by disease severity. Correlations between Acro-TSQ scales and other collateral measures exceeded 0.30 in absolute value, confirming convergent validity. Responsiveness in Acro-TSQ scale scores reflected improved disease control. The MID was estimated for Symptom Interference (10-12 points), Treatment Convenience (9-11) and GI Interference (8-10). CONCLUSIONS The Acro-TSQ is a brief, yet comprehensive tool to monitor important outcomes associated with injectable acromegaly SSA treatments. Its content reflects both disease and treatment burden as well as patient satisfaction, and its relevant for use in clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Fleseriu
- Departments of Medicine and Neurological Surgery and Northwest Pituitary Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3303 SW Bond Ave, CH8N, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Leon Fogelfeld
- John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Murray B Gordon
- Allegheny Neuroendocrinology Center, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Ross D Crosby
- Health Outcomes Solutions, Winter Park, FL, USA
- Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Fargo, ND, USA
- University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, ND, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Giustina A, Barkan A, Beckers A, Biermasz N, Biller BMK, Boguszewski C, Bolanowski M, Bonert V, Bronstein MD, Casanueva FF, Clemmons D, Colao A, Ferone D, Fleseriu M, Frara S, Gadelha MR, Ghigo E, Gurnell M, Heaney AP, Ho K, Ioachimescu A, Katznelson L, Kelestimur F, Kopchick J, Krsek M, Lamberts S, Losa M, Luger A, Maffei P, Marazuela M, Mazziotti G, Mercado M, Mortini P, Neggers S, Pereira AM, Petersenn S, Puig-Domingo M, Salvatori R, Shimon I, Strasburger C, Tsagarakis S, van der Lely AJ, Wass J, Zatelli MC, Melmed S. A Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acromegaly Comorbidities: An Update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105:5586717. [PMID: 31606735 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the Acromegaly Consensus Group was to revise and update the consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly comorbidities last published in 2013. PARTICIPANTS The Consensus Group, convened by 11 Steering Committee members, consisted of 45 experts in the medical and surgical management of acromegaly. The authors received no corporate funding or remuneration. EVIDENCE This evidence-based consensus was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence following critical discussion of the current literature on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly comorbidities. CONSENSUS PROCESS Acromegaly Consensus Group participants conducted comprehensive literature searches for English-language papers on selected topics, reviewed brief presentations on each topic, and discussed current practice and recommendations in breakout groups. Consensus recommendations were developed based on all presentations and discussions. Members of the Scientific Committee graded the quality of the supporting evidence and the consensus recommendations using the GRADE system. CONCLUSIONS Evidence-based approach consensus recommendations address important clinical issues regarding multidisciplinary management of acromegaly-related cardiovascular, endocrine, metabolic, and oncologic comorbidities, sleep apnea, and bone and joint disorders and their sequelae, as well as their effects on quality of life and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giustina
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ariel Barkan
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Albert Beckers
- Department of Endocrinology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Nienke Biermasz
- Division of Endocrinology and Center for Endocrine Tumors, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Beverly M K Biller
- Neuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cesar Boguszewski
- SEMPR, Endocrine Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Marek Bolanowski
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Isotope Therapy, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Vivien Bonert
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Marcello D Bronstein
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Felipe F Casanueva
- Division of Endocrinology, Santiago de Compostela University and Ciber OBN, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - David Clemmons
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Annamaria Colao
- Division of Endocrinologia, Universita' Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Diego Ferone
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Fleseriu
- Departments of Medicine and Neurological Surgery, Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Stefano Frara
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica R Gadelha
- Neuroendocrinology Research Center/Endocrinology Section, Medical School and Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ezio Ghigo
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Mark Gurnell
- University of Cambridge & Addenbrooke's Hospital, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony P Heaney
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ken Ho
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research and St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adriana Ioachimescu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, and Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Laurence Katznelson
- Departments of Medicine and Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - John Kopchick
- Edison Biotechnology Institute and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio
| | - Michal Krsek
- 2nd Department of Medicine, 3rd Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Marco Losa
- Department of Neurosurgery, San Raffaele University Health Institute Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Anton Luger
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pietro Maffei
- Department of Medicine, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Monica Marazuela
- Department of Medicine, CIBERER, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gherardo Mazziotti
- Endocrinology Unit, Humanitas University and Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Moises Mercado
- Division of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Experimental Endocrinology Unit, Centro Médico Nacional, Siglo XXI, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery, San Raffaele University Health Institute Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sebastian Neggers
- Pituitary Center Rotterdam, Endocrinology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto M Pereira
- Division of Endocrinology and Center for Endocrine Tumors, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manel Puig-Domingo
- Endocrinology Service, CIBER and CIBERES Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute and Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Roberto Salvatori
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism and Pituitary Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ilan Shimon
- Endocrine Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel
| | - Christian Strasburger
- Department of Medicine for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutritional Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stylianos Tsagarakis
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - A J van der Lely
- Pituitary Center Rotterdam, Endocrinology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John Wass
- Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Chiara Zatelli
- Section of Endocrinology & Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Shlomo Melmed
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tulipano G. How treatments with endocrine and metabolic drugs influence pituitary cell function. Endocr Connect 2020; 9:R14-R27. [PMID: 31905162 PMCID: PMC6993271 DOI: 10.1530/ec-19-0482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
A variety of endocrine and metabolic signals regulate pituitary cell function acting through the hypothalamus-pituitary neuroendocrine axes or directly at the pituitary level. The underlying intracellular transduction mechanisms in pituitary cells are still debated. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) functions as a cellular sensor of low energy stores in all mammalian cells and promotes adaptive changes in response to calorie restriction. It is also regarded as a target for therapy of proliferative disorders. Various hormones and drugs can promote tissue-specific activation or inhibition of AMPK by enhancing or inhibiting AMPK phosphorylation, respectively. This review explores the preclinical studies published in the last decade that investigate the role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the intracellular transduction pathways downstream of endocrine and metabolic signals or drugs affecting pituitary cell function, and its role as a target for drug therapy of pituitary proliferative disorders. The effects of the hypoglycemic agent metformin, which is an indirect AMPK activator, are discussed. The multiple effects of metformin on cell metabolism and cell signalling and ultimately on cell function may be either dependent or independent of AMPK. The in vitro effects of metformin may also help highlighting differences in metabolic requirements between pituitary adenomatous cells and normal cells.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cozzi R, Ambrosio MR, Attanasio R, Bozzao A, De Marinis L, De Menis E, Guastamacchia E, Lania A, Lasio G, Logoluso F, Maffei P, Poggi M, Toscano V, Zini M, Chanson P, Katznelson L. Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME) and Italian AACE Chapter Position Statement for Clinical Practice: Acromegaly - Part 2: Therapeutic Issues. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2020; 20:1144-1155. [PMID: 31995025 PMCID: PMC7579256 DOI: 10.2174/1871530320666200129113328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Any newly diagnosed patient should be referred to a multidisciplinary team experienced in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. The therapeutic management of acromegaly always requires a personalized strategy. Normal age-matched IGF-I values are the treatment goal. Transsphenoidal surgery by an expert neurosurgeon is the primary treatment modality for most patients, especially if there are neurological complications. In patients with poor clinical conditions or who refuse surgery, primary medical treatment should be offered, firstly with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). In patients who do not reach hormonal targets with first-generation depot SSAs, a second pharmacological option with pasireotide LAR or pegvisomant (alone or combined with SSA) should be offered. Irradiation could be proposed to patients with surgical remnants who would like to be free from long-term medical therapies or those with persistent disease activity or tumor growth despite surgery or medical therapy. Since the therapeutic tools available enable therapeutic targets to be achieved in most cases, the challenge is to focus more on the quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Cozzi
- Address correspondence to this author at the Endocrinologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano, Italy; Tel: +39.347.5225490; E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Xie T, Tian P, Wu S, Zhang X, Liu T, Gu Y, Sun C, Hu F. Serum phosphate: Does it more closely reflect the true state of acromegaly? J Clin Neurosci 2019; 71:26-31. [PMID: 31859176 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
An increased serum phosphate (P) level is common in acromegaly patients, however, the relationships among P, growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and disease status remain unknown. To reveal these relationships, we examined the association of P with comprehensive clinical data. We measured the serum P, calcium, GH, oral glucose tolerance test-GH (OGTT-GH), IGF-1, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGBP-3) levels in 103 acromegaly patients. SAGIT® was used to assess the disease status comprehensively. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was obtained to evaluate the associations among the above parameters. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate factors independently associated factors with the SAGIT scores. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the percentage change in the serum phosphate level in predicting remission in patients with postoperatively discordant GH and IGF-1 levels. Hyperphosphatemia was found in 68.9% of patients at baseline. The serum P level was higher in the non-remission group, but no correlation was found between hyperphosphatemia and remission. We revealed a significant correlation between the P level and SAGIT® score in patients both preoperatively (r = 0.659, p = 0.000) and 1-year postoperatively without remission patients (r = 0.534, p = 0.027). All biochemical levels decreased significantly postoperatively, and the GH and OGTT-GH levels achieved early stability (1 month); however, the P, IGF-1 and IGBP-3 levels showed a gradual decline. A percentage change in P of -8.12% is recommended as a cut-off value for predicting remission in patients with postoperatively discordant GH and IGF-1 levels. As a metabolic product which affected by the GH/IGF-1 axis, serum P appears to more closely reflect the comprehensive disease status in acromegaly. When the GH and IGF-1 levels are discordant during follow-up, perioperative change in the P level may be a potential predictor of remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Xie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Pei Tian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Silin Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaobiao Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Digital Medical Research Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Shanghai, China.
| | - Tengfei Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ye Gu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chongjing Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fan Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fleseriu M, Fogelfeld L, Gordon MB, Sisco J, Colwell HH, Ludlam WH, Haviv A, Mathias SD. Development of a novel patient-reported measure for acromegaly: the Acro-TSQ. Pituitary 2019; 22:581-593. [PMID: 31522359 PMCID: PMC6842345 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-019-00986-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) represent a mainstay of medical treatment for acromegaly, currently available as either intramuscular or deep subcutaneous injections. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly common as relevant outcomes in studies of acromegaly and its treatment, but there are no validated PRO measures available that focus on the disease burden and the impact of treatment, specifically designed for use in patients with acromegaly. We sought to develop a new and unique PRO measure, the Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (Acro-TSQ). METHODS Concept elicitation (CE) interviews were conducted with acromegaly patients in the United States receiving SSA injections at a stable dose for ≥ 6 months. A questionnaire was drafted based on these interviews; combined CE and cognitive debriefing (CE/CD) interviews were then conducted to confirm the content, clarity, and relevance of the questionnaire. RESULTS Nineteen subjects completed interviews [n = 9 CE, n = 10 CE/CD; n = 15 Lanreotide Depot/Autogel (Somatuline), n = 4 Octreotide LAR (Sandostatin LAR)]. Most subjects responded positively when asked about the effectiveness of their current treatment; however, breakthrough symptoms, injection site reactions, and side effects were commonly reported and had negative impacts on social and emotional well-being and daily activities. All 10 subjects involved in debriefing interviews found the questionnaire to be relevant, easy to complete, and found the response options to be clear. The resulting 26-item Acro-TSQ covers symptoms and symptom control, gastrointestinal side effects and their impact on daily activities, the emotional impact of treatment, convenience and ease of use, and overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS The Acro-TSQ is a novel PRO, focused on both disease burden and impact of treatment; it was found to be comprehensive, clear, and relevant for patients with acromegaly receiving injectable SSA treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Fleseriu
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Medicine, Northwest Pituitary Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3303 SW Bond Ave, CH8N, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Leon Fogelfeld
- John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Murray B Gordon
- Allegheny Neuroendocrinology Center, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Giustina A, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, Petersenn S, Casanueva FF, Sert C, Houchard A, Melmed S. Staging and managing patients with acromegaly in clinical practice: baseline data from the SAGIT® validation study. Pituitary 2019; 22:476-487. [PMID: 31338660 PMCID: PMC6728296 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-019-00977-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The SAGIT® instrument, designed to assist clinicians to stage acromegaly, assess treatment response and adapt patient management, was well received by endocrinologists in a pilot study. We report an interim analysis of baseline data from the validation phase. METHODS The SAGIT® validation study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02539927) is an international, non-interventional study. Data collection included: demographic/disease characteristics; medical/surgical histories; concomitant acromegaly treatments; investigators' subjective evaluation of disease-control status (clinical global evaluation of disease control [CGE-DC]; controlled/not controlled/yet to be clarified) and clinical disease activity (active/not active); growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels; investigators' therapeutic decision. RESULTS Of 228 patients enrolled, investigators considered disease to be controlled in 110 (48.2%), not controlled in 105 (46.1%), and yet to be clarified in 13 (5.7%) according to CGE-DC. Thirty-three patients were treatment-naïve (not controlled, n = 31; yet to be clarified, n = 2). Investigators considered 48.2% patients in the controlled and 95.2% in the not-controlled groups to have clinically active disease. In the controlled group, 29.7% of patients did not exhibit hormonal control (GH ≤ 2.5 µg/L; normalized IGF-1) and 47.3% did not have rigorous hormonal control (GH < 1.0 µg/L; normalized IGF-1) by contemporary consensus. Current acromegaly treatment was continued with no change for 91.8% of patients in the controlled and 40.0% in the not-controlled groups. CONCLUSIONS These data highlight discrepancies between investigator-evaluated disease-control status, disease activity, hormonal control, and treatment decisions in acromegaly. Once validated, the SAGIT® instrument may assist clinicians in making active management decisions for patients with acromegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giustina
- San Raffaele University Hospital Milan, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Philippe Chanson
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de l'Hypophyse (HYPO), Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction and Univ Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Paris, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Felipe F Casanueva
- Instituto Salud Carlos III, Santiago de Compostela University - CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Metabolic Fingerprint of Acromegaly and its Potential Usefulness in Clinical Practice. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8101549. [PMID: 31561638 PMCID: PMC6832216 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) levels are the main targets for monitoring acromegaly activity, but they are not in close relationship with the clinical course of the disease and the associated comorbidities. The present study was aimed at identifying metabolites that could be used as biomarkers for a better disease phenotyping. For this purpose, metabolic fingerprint using an untargeted metabolomic approach was examined in serum from 30 patients with acromegaly and 30 age-matched controls. Patients with acromegaly presented fewer branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) compared to the control group (valine: 4.75 ± 0.87 vs. 5.20 ± 1.06 arbitrary units (AUs), p < 0.05; isoleucine: 2.54 ± 0.41 vs. 2.80 ± 0.51 AUs; p < 0.05). BCAAs were also lower in patients with active disease compared to patients with normal levels of IGF-1 with or without medical treatment. GH, but not IGF-1, serum levels were inversely correlated with both valine and isoleucine. These findings indicate that low levels of BCAAs represent the main metabolic fingerprint of acromegaly and that GH, rather than IGF-1, might be the primary mediator. In addition, our results suggest that the assessment of BCAAs could help to identify active disease and to monitor the response to therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
|
26
|
Mosbah H, Brue T, Chanson P. [Not Available]. ANNALES D'ENDOCRINOLOGIE 2019; 80 Suppl 1:S10-S18. [PMID: 31606057 DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4266(19)30112-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Acromegaly is characterized by increased release of growth hormone (GH) and, consequently, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I), most often by a pituitary adenoma. Prolonged exposure to excess hormone leads to progressive somatic disfigurement and a wide range of systemic manifestations that are associated with increased mortality. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy is the treatment of choice of GH-secreting pituitary tumors but surgical cure is not achieved in around 50% of patients, then adjuvant treatment is necessary. Mortality in acromegaly is normalized with biochemical control and has decreased in the last decade with the increased use of adjuvant therapy. Both GH and IGF-I are currently biomarkers for assessing disease activity in patients with acromegaly. However, discordance between GH and IGF-I results is encountered in a quarter of treated patients. The impacts of such a discrepancy over mortality and morbidity and the risk of biochemical and/or clinical recurrence are unclear. Moreover, despite a good biochemical control, some symptoms persist, leading to a decreased quality of life. Back pain due to vertebral fractures seem to be frequent in these patients and underdiagnosed. In patients with acromegaly, bone mineral density is not a reliable predictor of fracture risk. A more accurate evaluation of bone microstructural alterations associated with GH hypersecretion and vertebral fractures may be provided by new radiological devices analyzing alteration of trabecular microarchitecture, leading to a better prevention. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Les Must de l'Endocrinologie 2019 réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel de Ipsen-Pharma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héléna Mosbah
- Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital de Bicêtre, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Faculté de médecine Paris-Sud, université Paris-Sud et Université Paris-Saclay, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
| | - Thierry Brue
- Aix-Marseille université, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), U1251, Marseille Medical Genetics (MMG), Marseille, France ; Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), service d'endocrinologie, hôpital de la Conception, centre de référence des maladies rares de l'hypophyse HYPO, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Chanson
- Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital de Bicêtre, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Faculté de médecine Paris-Sud, université Paris-Sud et Université Paris-Saclay, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Granada ML. Biochemical following-up of treated acromegaly. Limitations of the current determinations of IGF-I and perspective. MINERVA ENDOCRINOL 2019; 44:143-158. [DOI: 10.23736/s0391-1977.18.02922-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
28
|
Stieg MR, Auer MK, Berr C, Fazel J, Reincke M, Zopp S, Yassouridis A, Stalla GK. Clinical score system in the treatment of Cushing's disease: failure to identify discriminative variables from the German Cushing's Registry. Pituitary 2019; 22:129-136. [PMID: 30734142 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-019-00942-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a multidimensional and integrated clinical scoring instrument, that encompasses, summarizes and weights appropriately the desired clinical benefits of a treatment for Cushing's disease (CD). METHODS A panel of 42 variables potentially relevant to the clinical course of CD was predefined by endocrinology experts taking into account relevant literature. Variables as well as biochemical disease activity assessed as urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels were evaluated at baseline and at least after 12 months in patients treated between 2012 and 2016 in two Munich-based academic centres of the German Cushing's Registry. The primary endpoint was the identification of variables whose changes from baseline to follow-up visit(s) could characterize well biochemical cured from not cured patients after 12 months. RESULTS Ninety nine patients with at least two consecutive visits were enrolled. Biochemical data were available for 138 visit-pairs among which UFC was not controlled in 48 (34.8%) and controlled in 90 (65.2%) first visits. In 41 (29.7%) consecutive visits (visit-pairs) changes in biochemical activity categories was observed between visits; concretely: in 17 (12.3%) consecutive visits changing from previously controlled to not controlled, and in 24 (17.4%) from uncontrolled to controlled biochemical activity. Multivariate statistical analyses (especially analyses of variance) based on data of the 138 visit-pairs were performed in order to proof possible effects of biochemical activity on clinical benefits. However, in none of the considered 42 variables corresponding to quality of life-dimensions, laboratory, anthropometric, musculo-skeletal or other clinical areas any statistically significant differences between different categories of biochemical activity were observed. CONCLUSION It was not possible to provide clinical key parameters in our population of patients with CD discriminating biochemical cured from non-cured patients and to construct a clinical scoring system reflecting clinical treatment benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareike R Stieg
- Neuroendocrinology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry Munich, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804, Munich, Germany.
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matthias K Auer
- Neuroendocrinology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry Munich, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804, Munich, Germany
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Christina Berr
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Fazel
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Reincke
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie Zopp
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Yassouridis
- Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry Munich, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804, Munich, Germany
| | - Günter K Stalla
- Neuroendocrinology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry Munich, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Acromegaly is characterized by increased release of growth hormone and, consequently, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF1), most often by a pituitary adenoma. Prolonged exposure to excess hormone leads to progressive somatic disfigurement and a wide range of systemic manifestations that are associated with increased mortality. Although considered a rare disease, recent studies have reported an increased incidence of acromegaly owing to better disease awareness, improved diagnostic tools and perhaps a real increase in prevalence. Acromegaly treatment approaches, which include surgery, radiotherapy and medical therapy, have changed considerably over time owing to improved surgical procedures, development of new radiotherapy techniques and availability of new medical therapies. The optimal use of these treatments will reduce mortality in patients with acromegaly to levels in the general population. Medical therapy is currently an important treatment option and can even be the first-line treatment in patients with acromegaly who will not benefit from or are not suitable for first-line neurosurgical treatment. Pharmacological treatments include somatostatin receptor ligands (such as octreotide, lanreotide and pasireotide), dopamine agonists and the growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant. In this Primer, we review the main aspects of acromegaly, including scientific advances that underlie expanding knowledge of disease pathogenesis, improvements in disease management and new medical therapies that are available and in development to improve disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Colao
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Sezione di Endocrinologia, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Ludovica F S Grasso
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Sezione di Endocrinologia, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Giustina
- Chair of Endocrinology, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milano, Italy
| | - Shlomo Melmed
- Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Philippe Chanson
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, Centre de Référence des Maladies Endocriniennes Rares de la Croissance, Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris, France.,UMR S-1185, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud 11, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Alberto M Pereira
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Center for Endocrine Tumors, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rosario Pivonello
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Sezione di Endocrinologia, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Günther T, Tulipano G, Dournaud P, Bousquet C, Csaba Z, Kreienkamp HJ, Lupp A, Korbonits M, Castaño JP, Wester HJ, Culler M, Melmed S, Schulz S. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature. Pharmacol Rev 2019; 70:763-835. [PMID: 30232095 PMCID: PMC6148080 DOI: 10.1124/pr.117.015388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST2 and SST5 receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST2 is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Günther
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Giovanni Tulipano
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Pascal Dournaud
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Corinne Bousquet
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Zsolt Csaba
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Hans-Jürgen Kreienkamp
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Amelie Lupp
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Márta Korbonits
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Justo P Castaño
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Michael Culler
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Shlomo Melmed
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Stefan Schulz
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ramos-Leví AM, Marazuela M. Bringing Cardiovascular Comorbidities in Acromegaly to an Update. How Should We Diagnose and Manage Them? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:120. [PMID: 30930848 PMCID: PMC6423916 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with acromegaly frequently develop cardiovascular comorbidities, which significantly affect their morbidity and contribute to an increased all-cause mortality. In this regard, the most frequent complications that these patients may encounter include hypertension, cardiomyopathy, heart valve disease, arrhythmias, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. The specific underlying mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of these comorbidities are not always fully understood, but uncontrolled GH/IGF-I excess, age, prolonged disease duration, and coexistence of other cardio-vascular risk factors have been identified as significant influencing predisposing factors. It is important that clinicians bear in mind the potential development of cardiovascular comorbidities in acromegalic patients, in order to promptly tackle them, and avoid the progression of cardiac abnormalities. In many cases, this approach may be performed using straightforward screening tools, which will guide us for further diagnosis and management of cardiovascular complications. This article focuses on those cardiovascular comorbidities that are most frequently encountered in acromegalic patients, describes their pathophysiology, and suggests some recommendations for an early and optimal diagnosis, management and treatment.
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Melmed S, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, Klibanski A, Casanueva FF, Wass JAH, Strasburger CJ, Luger A, Clemmons DR, Giustina A. A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018; 14:552-561. [PMID: 30050156 PMCID: PMC7136157 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The 11th Acromegaly Consensus Conference in April 2017 was convened to update recommendations on therapeutic outcomes for patients with acromegaly. Consensus guidelines on the medical management of acromegaly were last published in 2014; since then, new pharmacological agents have been developed and new approaches to treatment sequencing have been considered. Thirty-seven experts in the management of patients with acromegaly reviewed the current literature and assessed changes in drug approvals, clinical practice standards and clinical opinion. They considered current treatment outcome goals with a focus on the impact of current and emerging somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists and dopamine agonists on biochemical, clinical, tumour mass and surgical outcomes. The participants discussed factors that would determine pharmacological choices as well as the proposed place of each agent in the guidelines. We present consensus recommendations highlighting how acromegaly management could be optimized in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shlomo Melmed
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Marcello D Bronstein
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Philippe Chanson
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de l'Hypophyse, Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris, France
- UMR S-1185, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Anne Klibanski
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Felipe F Casanueva
- Department of Medicine, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - John A H Wass
- Department of Endocrinology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Anton Luger
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David R Clemmons
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Andrea Giustina
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, San Raffaele University Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Faggi L, Giustina A, Tulipano G. Effects of metformin on cell growth and AMPK activity in pituitary adenoma cell cultures, focusing on the interaction with adenylyl cyclase activating signals. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2018; 470:60-74. [PMID: 28962892 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Revised: 09/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
For a few years we have been investigating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as a target for drug therapy of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Aim of this study was to investigate the direct effects of metformin, which causes AMPK activation in different cell types, on rat pituitary adenoma cell growth and on related cell signalling pathways. Our results suggest that metformin can exert a growth-inhibitory activity in rat pituitary tumor cells mediated by AMPK activation, although multiple mechanisms are most likely involved. Membrane proteins, including growth factor receptors, are valuable targets of AMPK. The inhibition of the mTOR-p70S6 kinase signalling pathway plays a role in the suppressive effect of metformin on pituitary tumor cell growth. Metformin did not affect the MTT reduction activity in energetic stress conditions. Finally, metformin was still able to induce AMPK activation and to inhibit cell growth in cells treated with forskolin and in transfected cells overexpressing GHRH-receptor and treated with GHRH. Hence, adenylyl cyclase over-activation does not account for the lack of response of some human pituitary tumors to AMPK-activating compounds in vitro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Faggi
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Giustina
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Italy; Endocrine Service, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tulipano
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schilbach K, Olsson DS, Boguszewski MCS, Bidlingmaier M, Johannsson G, Jørgensen JOL. Biomarkers of GH action in children and adults. Growth Horm IGF Res 2018; 40:1-8. [PMID: 29601998 DOI: 10.1016/j.ghir.2018.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Revised: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Growth hormone (GH) and IGF-I levels in serum are used as biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of GH-related disorders but have not been subject to structured validation. Auxological parameters in children and changes in body composition in adults, as well as metabolic parameters and patient related outcomes are used as clinical and surrogate endpoints. New treatment options, such as long acting GH and GH antagonists, require reevaluation of the currently used biochemical biomarkers. This article will review biomarkers, surrogate endpoints and clinical endpoints related to GH treatment in children and adults as well as in acromegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schilbach
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Daniel S Olsson
- Department of Internal medicine and clinical nutrition, Sahlgrenska academy, University of Gothenburg, Department of Endocrinology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Margaret C S Boguszewski
- Department of Pediatrics, Endocrine Division (SEMPR), Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Martin Bidlingmaier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Gudmundur Johannsson
- Department of Internal medicine and clinical nutrition, Sahlgrenska academy, University of Gothenburg, Department of Endocrinology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Johannsson G, Bidlingmaier M, Biller BMK, Boguszewski M, Casanueva FF, Chanson P, Clayton PE, Choong CS, Clemmons D, Dattani M, Frystyk J, Ho K, Hoffman AR, Horikawa R, Juul A, Kopchick JJ, Luo X, Neggers S, Netchine I, Olsson DS, Radovick S, Rosenfeld R, Ross RJ, Schilbach K, Solberg P, Strasburger C, Trainer P, Yuen KCJ, Wickstrom K, Jorgensen JOL. Growth Hormone Research Society perspective on biomarkers of GH action in children and adults. Endocr Connect 2018; 7:R126-R134. [PMID: 29483159 PMCID: PMC5868631 DOI: 10.1530/ec-18-0047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Growth Hormone Research Society (GRS) convened a Workshop in 2017 to evaluate clinical endpoints, surrogate endpoints and biomarkers during GH treatment of children and adults and in patients with acromegaly. PARTICIPANTS GRS invited 34 international experts including clinicians, basic scientists, a regulatory scientist and physicians from the pharmaceutical industry. EVIDENCE Current literature was reviewed and expert opinion was utilized to establish the state of the art and identify current gaps and unmet needs. CONSENSUS PROCESS Following plenary presentations, breakout groups discussed questions framed by the planning committee. The attendees re-convened after each breakout session to share the group reports. A writing team compiled the breakout session reports into a document that was subsequently discussed and revised by participants. This was edited further and circulated for final review after the meeting. Participants from pharmaceutical companies were not part of the writing process. CONCLUSIONS The clinical endpoint in paediatric GH treatment is adult height with height velocity as a surrogate endpoint. Increased life expectancy is the ideal but unfeasible clinical endpoint of GH treatment in adult GH-deficient patients (GHDA) and in patients with acromegaly. The pragmatic clinical endpoints in GHDA include normalization of body composition and quality of life, whereas symptom relief and reversal of comorbidities are used in acromegaly. Serum IGF-I is widely used as a biomarker, even though it correlates weakly with clinical endpoints in GH treatment, whereas in acromegaly, normalization of IGF-I may be related to improvement in mortality. There is an unmet need for novel biomarkers that capture the pleiotropic actions of GH in relation to GH treatment and in patients with acromegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gudmundur Johannsson
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical NutritionSahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Martin Bidlingmaier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IVKlinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Beverly M K Biller
- Neuroendocrine UnitMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Felipe F Casanueva
- Department of MedicineComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Peter E Clayton
- Developmental Biology & MedicineFaculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Catherine S Choong
- Department of EndocrinologyPrincess Margaret Hospital & School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia
| | - David Clemmons
- Department of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mehul Dattani
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondon, UK
| | - Jan Frystyk
- Department of EndocrinologyOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ken Ho
- Princess Alexandra Hospital and University of QueenslandBrisbane, Australia
| | - Andrew R Hoffman
- Department of MedicineStanford University and VA Palo Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Reiko Horikawa
- National Center for Child Health and DevelopmentTokyo, Japan
| | - Anders Juul
- Department of Growth and ReproductionRigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John J Kopchick
- Edison Biotechnology Institute and Heritage College of Osteopathic MedicineOhio University, Athens, Ohio, USA
| | - Xiaoping Luo
- Department of PediatricsTongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Sebastian Neggers
- Section of EndocrinologyDepartment of Medicine, Pituitary Centre Rotterdam, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Irene Netchine
- Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles EndocriniennesAP-HP, Hôpital Trousseau, Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMRs 938, Paris, France
| | - Daniel S Olsson
- Department of EndocrinologyInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sally Radovick
- Rutgers University-Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolNew Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ron Rosenfeld
- Department of PediatricsOregon Health Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Katharina Schilbach
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IVKlinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Paulo Solberg
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Peter Trainer
- The Christie NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kevin C J Yuen
- Barrow Pituitary CenterBarrow Neurological Institute, Department of Neuroendocrinology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
van der Lely AJ, Gomez R, Pleil A, Badia X, Brue T, Buchfelder M, Burman P, Clemmons D, Ghigo E, Jørgensen JOL, Luger A, van der Lans-Bussemaker J, Webb SM, Strasburger CJ. Development of ACRODAT ®, a new software medical device to assess disease activity in patients with acromegaly. Pituitary 2017; 20:692-701. [PMID: 28887782 PMCID: PMC5655576 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-017-0835-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite availability of multimodal treatment options for acromegaly, achievement of long-term disease control is suboptimal in a significant number of patients. Furthermore, disease control as defined by biochemical normalization may not always show concordance with disease-related symptoms or patient's perceived quality of life. We developed and validated a tool to measure disease activity in acromegaly to support decision-making in clinical practice. METHODS An international expert panel (n = 10) convened to define the most critical indicators of disease activity. Patient scenarios were constructed based on these chosen parameters. Subsequently, a panel of 21 renowned endocrinologists at pituitary centers (Europe and Canada) categorized each scenario as stable, mild, or significant disease activity in an online validation study. RESULTS From expert opinion, five parameters emerged as the best overall indicators to evaluate disease activity: insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) level, tumor status, presence of comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, sleep apnea), symptoms, and health-related quality of life. In the validation study, IGF-I and tumor status became the predominant parameters selected for classification of patients with moderate or severe disease activity. If IGF-I level was ≤1.2x upper limit of normal and tumor size not significantly increased, the remaining three parameters contributed to the decision in a compensatory manner. CONCLUSION The validation study underlined IGF-I and tumor status for routine clinical decision-making, whereas patient-oriented outcome measures received less medical attention. An Acromegaly Disease Activity Tool (ACRODAT) is in development that might assist clinicians towards a more holistic approach to patient management in acromegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aart J van der Lely
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roy Gomez
- Pfizer Medical Affairs, 17 Boulevard de la Plaine, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Andreas Pleil
- Pfizer Inc, 10555 Science Center Drive, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Xavier Badia
- University of Barcelona and Omakase Consulting, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 585, 08007, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Thierry Brue
- Aix-Marseille Université, APHM, Hôpital Conception, Service d'Endocrinologie, Diabète et Maladies Métaboliques, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de l'hypophyse HYPO, 13385 Cedex 15, Marseille, France
| | - Michael Buchfelder
- Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Pia Burman
- Skane University Hospital, University of Lund, Jan Waldenströms gata 24, Malmö, Sweden
| | - David Clemmons
- UNC Hospitals Diabetes and Endocrinology Clinic, 300 Meadowmont Village Cir #202, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA
| | - Ezio Ghigo
- University Hospital Città Salute e Scienza, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen
- Aarhus University, Institut for Klinisk Medicin - Medicinsk Endokrinologisk afdeling MEA, NBG, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anton Luger
- Medizinische Universität und Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Susan M Webb
- Hospital and IIB-S Pau Barcelona, UAB and CIBERER Unit 747, Padre Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Giustina A, Mazziotti G, Cannavò S, Castello R, Arnaldi G, Bugari G, Cozzi R, Ferone D, Formenti AM, Gatti E, Grottoli S, Maffei P, Maffezzoni F, Montini M, Terzolo M, Ghigo E. High-Dose and High-Frequency Lanreotide Autogel in Acromegaly: A Randomized, Multicenter Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102:2454-2464. [PMID: 28419317 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-00142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Increase in drug frequency or dose is recommended for acromegaly patients with partial response to long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). However, the efficacy and safety data with lanreotide (LAN) Autogel (LAN-ATG) at high dose (HD) or high frequency (HF) are still scanty. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the biochemical efficacy and safety of HF and HD LAN-ATG in patients with active acromegaly. DESIGN Twenty-four-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS Thirty patients with active acromegaly, partial responders to SRLs, were randomized to HF (120 mg/21 days; 15 patients) or HD (180 mg/28 days; 15 patients) LAN-ATG. OUTCOMES Normalization of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and reduction in random growth hormone (GH) values < 1.0 µg/L, reduction in serum IGF-I and GH from baseline, differences in biochemical response between HF and HD LAN-ATG, adverse events. RESULTS IGF-I decreased significantly (P = 0.007) during the 24-week treatment, with greater decrease in HD (P = 0.03) vs HF group (P = 0.08). Normalization in IGF-I values occurred in 27.6% of patients (P = 0.016 vs baseline), without a significant difference between HF and HD groups (P = 0.59). The decrease in serum IGF-I significantly correlated with serum LAN values (P = 0.04), and normalization of IGF-I was predicted by baseline IGF-I values (P = 0.02). Serum GH values did not change significantly (P = 0.22). Overall, 19 patients (63.3%) experienced adverse events, all being mild to moderate and transient, without differences between the two therapeutic arms. CONCLUSION HF and HD LAN-ATG regimens are effective in normalizing IGF-I values in about one-third of patients with active acromegaly inadequately controlled by long-term conventional SRLs therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giustina
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Gherardo Mazziotti
- Endocrinology Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Carlo Poma, 46100 Mantova, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Castello
- Division of General Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Giorgio Arnaldi
- Division of Endocrinology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanna Bugari
- Laboratory of Chemical Analysis, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Spedali Civili, 25126 Brescia, Italy
| | - Renato Cozzi
- Division of Endocrinology, Ospedale Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Ferone
- Endocrinology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-Istituto dei Tumori, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Formenti
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Enza Gatti
- Neuroradiology, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Silvia Grottoli
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Maffei
- Department of Medicine, Padua University Hospital, 35121 Padua, Italy
| | - Filippo Maffezzoni
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Ezio Ghigo
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
de Fátima Borges M, Lara BHJ, Tomé JM, de Araújo LP, Bugiga FCL, Sousa JC, Soares JMF, Dezena RA, Ferreira BP. Treatment of acromegaly patients at the Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM): Experience Report. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2017; 72:218-223. [PMID: 28492721 PMCID: PMC5401613 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017(04)05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment of acromegaly patients at the Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro. METHODS: Cross-sectional and retrospective study of thirty cases treated over a period of two decades. RESULTS: 17 men (56.7%) aged 14-67 years and 13 women aged 14-86 years were analyzed. Twenty-one patients underwent transphenoidal surgery, whichwas associated with somatostatin receptor ligands in 11 patients (39.3%), somatostatin receptor ligands + radiotherapyin 5 patients (17.8%), radiotherapy in 3 patients (10.7%), and radiotherapy + somatostatin receptorligands + cabergoline in 1 patient (3.6%). Additionally, 2 patients underwent radiotherapy and surgeryalone. Six patients received somatostatin receptor ligands before surgery, and 2 were not treated due to refusal and death. Nine patients have died, and 20 are being followed; 13 (65%) have growth hormonelevels o1 ng/mL, and 11 have normal insulin-like growth factor 1 levels. CONCLUSION: The current treatment options enable patients seen in regional reference centers to achieve strict control parameters, which allows them to be treated close to their homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria de Fátima Borges
- Divisão de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, BR
| | | | - Janaíne Machado Tomé
- Divisão de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, BR
| | | | | | - Júlio Cláudio Sousa
- Divisão de Otorrinolaringologia, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, BR
| | | | | | - Beatriz Pires Ferreira
- Divisão de Endocrinologia e Metabolismo, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, BR
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Acromegalic osteopathy is an emerging complication of acromegaly characterized by increase in bone turnover, deterioration in bone microarchitecture and high risk of vertebral fractures. Vertebral fractures, as diagnosed by a radiological and morphometric approach, occur in about one-third of acromegaly patients in close relationship with duration of active disease. However, the prediction of vertebral fractures in this clinical setting is still a matter of uncertainty, since the pathogenesis of acromegalic osteopathy is multifactorial and fractures may occur even in presence of normal bone mineral density. In this narrative article, we summarize the pathophysiology and clinical aspects of acromegalic osteopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Mazziotti
- Chair of Endocrinology, University of Brescia, Via Biseo, 17, 25123, Brescia, Italy
- Endocrinology Unit, ASST Carlo Poma of Mantua, Mantua, Italy
| | - F Maffezzoni
- Chair of Endocrinology, University of Brescia, Via Biseo, 17, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - S Frara
- Chair of Endocrinology, University of Brescia, Via Biseo, 17, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Giustina
- Chair of Endocrinology, University of Brescia, Via Biseo, 17, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Somatostatin analog treatment is first line medical treatment in patients with acromegaly. This drug is currently mainly administered by monthly depot preparations of octreotide and lanreotide. With the innovative transient permeability enhancer, a technology enabling the absorption of drug molecules via transient opening of the tight junctions of the gut epithelium, it is possible to achieve therapeutic octreotide levels after oral ingestion. The present review summarized the preclinical work and the recently reported phase I and III study on oral octreotide capsules in patients with acromegaly. Maintenance of control in 155 participating patients was achieved in 65% at the end of core period. Once controlled on oral octreotide, the response was maintained to the end of the extension phase in 85%. Side effects were comparable to currently available preparations. There was a profound suppression of growth hormone levels, and significant symptom reduction. Currently available parental somatostatin analogs are generally well tolerated and are able to achieve longstanding biochemical control in patients with somatostatin sensitive tumors. Potential advantages of an oral alternative is the lack injection-related side effects, but there will be an ongoing need for a very strict compliance with the 2 daily dose regimen and fasting around drug administrations. A second phase III study is currently being conducted. The potential place in the treatment of acromegaly is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke R Biermasz
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, BOX 9600, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
The risks of overlooking the diagnosis of secreting pituitary adenomas. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016; 11:135. [PMID: 27716353 PMCID: PMC5052978 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0516-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 09/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Secreting pituitary adenomas that cause acromegaly and Cushing’s disease, as well as prolactinomas and thyrotroph adenomas, are uncommon, usually benign, slow-growing tumours. The rarity of these conditions means that their diagnosis is not familiar to most non-specialist physicians. Consequently, pituitary adenomas may be overlooked and remain untreated, and affected individuals may develop serious comorbidities that reduce their quality of life and life expectancy. Because many signs and symptoms of pituitary adenomas overlap with those of other, more common disorders, general practitioners and non-endocrinology specialists need to be aware of the “red flags” suggestive of these conditions. A long duration of active disease in patients with secreting pituitary adenomas is associated with an increased risk of comorbidities and reduced quality of life. Appropriate treatment can lead to disease remission, and, although some symptoms may persist in some patients, treatment usually reduces the incidence and severity of comorbidities and improves quality of life. Therefore, correct, early diagnosis and characterization of a pituitary adenoma is crucial for patients, to trigger timely, appropriate treatment and to optimize outcome. This article provides an overview of the epidemiology of hormonal syndromes associated with pituitary adenomas, discusses the difficulties of and considerations for their diagnosis, and reviews the comorbidities that may develop, but can be prevented, by accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. We hope this review will help general practitioners and non-endocrinology specialists to suspect secreting pituitary adenomas and refer patients to an endocrinologist for confirmation of the diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
|
43
|
Maffezzoni F, Frara S, Doga M, Mazziotti G, Giustina A. New medical therapies of acromegaly. Growth Horm IGF Res 2016; 30-31:58-63. [PMID: 27745780 DOI: 10.1016/j.ghir.2016.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Revised: 09/26/2016] [Accepted: 10/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Acromegaly is a rare disease associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. Treatment of acromegaly aims at controlling growth hormone hypersecretion, improving patients' symptoms and comorbidities and normalizing mortality. The therapeutic options for acromegaly include surgery, medical therapies and radiotherapy. However, despite all these treatment options, approximately one-half of patients are not adequately controlled. Progress in molecular research has made possible to develop new therapeutic strategies to improve control of acromegaly. This article will review the new medical approaches to acromegaly which consist in evolution of traditional therapeutic protocols and development of new molecules with different profiles of activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Frara
- Endocrinology, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - M Doga
- Endocrinology, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - G Mazziotti
- Endocrinology, University of Brescia, Italy; Endocrinology, ASST Carlo Poma of Mantua, Italy
| | - A Giustina
- Endocrinology, University of Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Maffezzoni F, Formenti AM, Mazziotti G, Frara S, Giustina A. Current and future medical treatments for patients with acromegaly. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016; 17:1631-42. [PMID: 27352098 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1199687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acromegaly is a relatively rare condition of growth hormone (GH) excess associated with significant morbidity and, when left untreated, high mortality. Therapy for acromegaly is targeted at decreasing GH and insulin-like growth hormone 1 levels, ameliorating patients' symptoms and decreasing any local compressive effects of the pituitary adenoma. The therapeutic options for acromegaly include surgery, medical therapies (such as dopamine agonists, somatostatin receptor ligands and the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant) and radiotherapy. However, despite all these treatments option, approximately 50% of patients are not adequately controlled. AREAS COVERED In this paper, the authors discuss: 1) efficacy and safety of current medical therapy 2) the efficacy and safety of the new multireceptor-targeted somatostatin ligand pasireotide 3) medical treatments currently under clinical investigation (oral octreotide, ITF2984, ATL1103), and 4) preliminary data on the use of new injectable and transdermal/transmucosal formulations of octreotide. EXPERT OPINION This expert opinion supports the need for new therapeutic agents and modalities for patients with acromegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stefano Frara
- a Chair of Endocrinology , University of Brescia , Brescia , Italy
| | - Andrea Giustina
- a Chair of Endocrinology , University of Brescia , Brescia , Italy
| |
Collapse
|