The functional sites of chlorophylls in D1 and D2 subunits of photosystem II identified by pulsed EPR

Triplet states in the reaction center of Photosystem II

In oxygenic photosynthesis sunlight is harvested and funneled as excitation energy into the reaction center (RC) of Photosystem II (PSII), the site of primary charge separation that initiates the photosynthetic electron transfer chain. The chlorophyll ChlD1 pigment of the RC is the primary electron donor, forming a charge-separated radical pair with the vicinal pheophytin PheoD1 (ChlD1+PheoD1-). To avert charge recombination, the electron is further transferred to plastoquinone QA, whereas the hole relaxes to a central pair of chlorophylls (PD1PD2), subsequently driving water oxidation. Spin-triplet states can form within the RC when forward electron transfer is inhibited or back reactions are favored. This can lead to formation of singlet dioxygen, with potential deleterious effects. Here we investigate the nature and properties of triplet states within the PSII RC using a multiscale quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) approach. The low-energy spectrum of excited singlet and triplet states, of both local and charge-transfer nature, is compared using range-separated time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT). We further compute electron paramagnetic resonance properties (zero-field splitting parameters and hyperfine coupling constants) of relaxed triplet states and compare them with available experimental data. Moreover, the electrostatic modulation of excited state energetics and redox properties of RC pigments by the semiquinone QA- is described. The results provide a detailed electronic-level understanding of triplet states within the PSII RC and form a refined basis for discussing primary and secondary electron transfer, charge recombination pathways, and possible photoprotection mechanisms in PSII.

Triplet Delocalization over the Reaction Center Chlorophylls in Photosystem II

The triplet state of chlorophyll formed by charge recombination in photosystem II (PSII) is a precursor of harmful singlet oxygen. Although main localization of the triplet state on the monomeric chlorophyll, Chl_D1, at cryogenic temperatures has been suggested, how the triplet state is delocalized on other chlorophylls remains unclear. Here, we investigated the distribution of the triplet state of chlorophyll in PSII using light-induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy. Measurements of triplet-minus-singlet FTIR difference spectra with PSII core complexes from cyanobacterial mutants, D1-V157H, D2-V156H, D2-H197A, and D1-H198A, in which the interactions of the 13¹-keto C═O groups of the reaction center chlorophylls, P_D1, P_D2, Chl_D1, and Chl_D2, respectively, were perturbed, identified the 13¹-keto C═O bands of the individual chlorophylls and showed that the triplet state is delocalized over all of these chlorophylls. It is suggested that the triplet delocalization plays important roles in the photoprotection and photodamage mechanisms in PSII.

Primary donor triplet states of Photosystem I and II studied by Q-band pulse ENDOR spectroscopy

The photoexcited triplet state of the "primary donors" in the two photosystems of oxygenic photosynthesis has been investigated by means of electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) at Q-band (34 GHz). The data obtained represent the first set of ¹H hyperfine coupling tensors of the ³P700 triplet state in PSI and expand the existing data set for ³P680. We achieved an extensive assignment of the observed electron-nuclear hyperfine coupling constants (hfcs) corresponding to the methine α-protons and the methyl group β-protons of the chlorophyll (Chl) macrocycle. The data clearly confirm that in both photosystems the primary donor triplet is located on one specific monomeric Chl at cryogenic temperature. In comparison to previous transient ENDOR and pulse ENDOR experiments at standard X-band (9-10 GHz), the pulse Q-band ENDOR spectra demonstrate both improved signal-to-noise ratio and increased resolution. The observed ENDOR spectra for ³P700 and ³P680 differ in terms of the intensity loss of lines from specific methyl group protons, which is explained by hindered methyl group rotation produced by binding site effects. Contact analysis of the methyl groups in the PSI crystal structure in combination with the ENDOR analysis of ³P700 suggests that the triplet is located on the Chl a' (P_A) in PSI. The results also provide additional evidence for the localization of ³P680 on the accessory Chl_D1 in PSII.

Site-directed mutations at D1-Thr179 of photosystem II in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 modify the spectroscopic properties of the accessory chlorophyll in the D1-branch of the reaction center

D1-Thr179, which overlies the reaction center chlorophyll Chl D1 of Photosystem II was replaced with His and Glu through site-directed mutation in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Spectroscopic characterization of the mutants indicates that, compared to wild type, the main bleaching in the triplet-minus-singlet absorbance difference spectrum and the electrochromic band shift in the (P680 (+)Q A (-)-P680Q A) absorbance difference spectrum are displaced to the red by approximately 2 nm in the D1-Thr179His mutant and to the blue by approximately 1 nm in the D1-Thr179Glu mutant. These difference spectra are compared with the absorbance difference spectra, measured on the same states in the D1-His198Gln mutant in which the axial ligand D1-His198 of the special pair chlorophyll, P D1, was replaced by glutamine. Together, these results give direct evidence that (a) the reaction center triplet state, produced upon charge recombination from (3)[P (+)Pheo (-)], is primarily localized on Chl D1; (b) the cation of the oxidized donor P (+) is predominantly localized on chlorophyll P D1 of the special pair; and (c) the Q Y band of the accessory chlorophyll Chl D1 is electrochromically shifted in response to charges on P (+) and Q A (-). Light-induced absorbance difference spectra (between 650 and 710 nm), associated with the oxidation of secondary donors and the reduction of Q A, exhibit a bleaching attributed to the oxidation of a Chl Z and strong electrochromic band shifts. On the basis of mutation-induced spectroscopic changes and of structure-based calculations, we conclude that the experimental spectra are best explained by a blue-shift of the Q Y band of the accessory chlorophyll Chl D1, arising from charges on Car D2 (+) and Chl ZD2 (+) and on reduced Q A.

On Cu(II)-Cu(II) distance measurements using pulsed electron electron double resonance

The effects of orientational selectivity on the 4-pulse electron electron double resonance (PELDOR) ESR spectra of coupled Cu(II)-Cu(II) spins are presented. The data were collected at four magnetic fields on a poly-proline peptide containing two Cu(II) centers. The Cu(II)-PELDOR spectra of this peptide do not change appreciably with magnetic field at X-band. The data were analyzed by adapting the theory of Maryasov, Tsvetkov, and Raap [A.G. Maryasov, Y.D. Tsvetkov, J. Raap, Weakly coupled radical pairs in solids:ELDOR in ESE structure studies, Appl. Magn. Reson. 14 (1998) 101-113]. Simulations indicate that orientational effects are important for Cu(II)-PELDOR. Based on simulations, the field-independence of the PELDOR data for this peptide is likely due to two effects. First, for this peptide, the Cu(II) g-tensor(s) are in a very specific orientation with respect to the interspin vector. Second, the flexibility of the peptide washes out the orientation effects. These effects reduce the suitability of the poly-proline based peptide as a good model system to experimentally probe orientational effects in such experiments. An average Cu(II)-Cu(II) distance of 2.1-2.2 nm was determined, which is consistent with earlier double quantum coherence ESR results.

Long-range distance determinations in biomacromolecules by EPR spectroscopy

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy provides a variety of tools to study structures and structural changes of large biomolecules or complexes thereof. In order to unravel secondary structure elements, domain arrangements or complex formation, continuous wave and pulsed EPR methods capable of measuring the magnetic dipole coupling between two unpaired electrons can be used to obtain long-range distance constraints on the nanometer scale. Such methods yield reliably and precisely distances of up to 80 A, can be applied to biomolecules in aqueous buffer solutions or membranes, and are not size limited. They can be applied either at cryogenic or physiological temperatures and down to amounts of a few nanomoles. Spin centers may be metal ions, metal clusters, cofactor radicals, amino acid radicals, or spin labels. In this review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of the different EPR spectroscopic methods, briefly describe their theoretical background, and summarize important biological applications. The main focus of this article will be on pulsed EPR methods like pulsed electron-electron double resonance (PELDOR) and their applications to spin-labeled biosystems.

Function of two beta-carotenes near the D1 and D2 proteins in photosystem II dimers

The antenna proteins in photosystem II (PSII) not only promote energy transfer to the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) but provide also an efficient cation sink to re-reduce chlorophyll a if the electron transfer (ET) from the Mn-cluster is inhibited. Using the newest PSII dimer crystal structure (3.0 A resolution), in which 11 beta-carotene molecules (Car) and 14 lipids are visible in the PSII monomer, we calculated the redox potentials (Em) of one-electron oxidation for all Car (Em(Car)) by solving the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. In each PSII monomer, the D1 protein harbors a previously unlocated Car (CarD1) in van der Waals contact with the chlorin ring of ChlZ(D1). Each CarD1 in the PSII dimer complex is located in the interface between the D1 and CP47 subunits, together with another four Car of the other PSII monomer and several lipid molecules. The proximity of Car bridging between CarD1 and plastoquinone/Q(A) may imply a direct charge recombination of Car+Q(A)-. The calculated Em(CarD1) and Em(ChlZ(D1)) are, respectively, 83 and 126 mV higher than Em(CarD2) and Em(ChlZ(D2)), which could explain why CarD2+ and ChlZ(D2)+ are observed rather than the corresponding CarD1+ and ChlZ(D1)+.