Thermodynamics of primary photosynthesis

A life in light - in honor of David Mauzerall on his 95th birthday

David Mauzerall was born on July 22, 1929 to a working-class family in the small, inland textile town of Sanford, Maine. Those humble origins instilled a lifelong frugality and an innovative spirit. After earning his PhD degree in 1954 in physical organic chemistry with Frank Westheimer at the University of Chicago, he joined The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now University) as a postdoctoral fellow that summer, rose to the rank of professor, and remained there for the rest of his career. His work over more than 60 years encompassed porphyrin biosynthesis, photoinduced electron-transfer reactions in diverse architectures (solutions, bilayer lipid membranes, reaction centers, chromatophores, and intact leaves), the light-saturation curve of photosynthesis, statistical treatments of photoreactions, and "all-things porphyrins." His research culminated in studies he poetically referred to as "listening to leaves" through the use of pulsed photoacoustic spectroscopy to probe the course and thermodynamics of photosynthesis in its native state. His research group was always small; indeed, of 185 total publications, 39 were singly authored. In brief, David Mauzerall has blended a deep knowledge of distinct disciplines of physical organic chemistry, photochemistry, spectroscopy and biophysics with ingenious experimental methods, incisive mathematical analysis, pristine personal integrity, and unyielding love of science to deepen our understanding of photosynthesis in its broadest context. He thought creatively - and always independently. His work helped systematize the fields of photosynthesis and the origin of life and made them more quantitative. The present article highlights a number of salient scientific discoveries and includes comments from members of his family, friends, and collaborators (Gary Brudvig, Greg Edens, Paul Falkowski, Alzatta Fogg, G. Govindjee, Nancy Greenbaum, Marilyn Gunner, Harvey Hou, Denise and Michele Mauzerall, Thomas Moore, and William Parson) as part of a celebration of his 95th birthday.

Entropy Perspectives of Molecular and Evolutionary Biology

Attempts to find and quantify the supposed low entropy of organisms and its preservation are revised. The absolute entropy of the mixed components of non-living biomass (approximately −1.6 × 10³ J K⁻¹ L⁻¹) is the reference to which other entropy decreases would be ascribed to life. The compartmentation of metabolites and the departure from the equilibrium of metabolic reactions account for reductions in entropy of 1 and 40–50 J K⁻¹ L⁻¹, respectively, and, though small, are distinctive features of living tissues. DNA and proteins do not supply significant decreases in thermodynamic entropy, but their low informational entropy is relevant for life and its evolution. No other living feature contributes significantly to the low entropy associated with life. The photosynthetic conversion of radiant energy to biomass energy accounts for most entropy (2.8 × 10⁵ J K⁻¹ carbon kg⁻¹) produced by living beings. The comparatively very low entropy produced in other processes (approximately 4.8 × 10² J K⁻¹ L⁻¹ day⁻¹ in the human body) must be rapidly exported outside as heat to preserve low entropy decreases due to compartmentation and non-equilibrium metabolism. Enzymes and genes are described, whose control minimizes the rate of production of entropy and could explain selective pressures in biological evolution and the rapid proliferation of cancer cells.

The controversy over the minimum quantum requirement for oxygen evolution

During the early- to mid-twentieth century, a bitter controversy raged among researchers on photosynthesis regarding the minimum number of light quanta required for the evolution of one molecule of oxygen. From 1923 until his death in 1970, Otto Warburg insisted that this value was about three or four quanta. Beginning in the late 1930s, Robert Emerson and others on the opposing side consistently obtained a value of 8-12 quanta. Warburg changed the protocols of his experiments, sometimes in unexplained ways, yet he almost always arrived at a value of four or less, except eight in carbonate/bicarbonate buffer, which he dismissed as "unphysiological". This paper is largely an abbreviated form of the detailed story on the minimum quantum requirement of photosynthesis, as told by Nickelsen and Govindjee (The maximum quantum yield controversy: Otto Warburg and the "Midwest-Gang", 2011); we provide here a scientific thread, leaving out the voluminous private correspondence among the principal players that Nickelsen and Govindjee (2011) examined in conjunction with their analysis of the principals' published papers. We explore the development and course of the controversy and the ultimate resolution in favor of Emerson's result as the phenomenon of the two-light-reaction, two-pigment-system scheme of photosynthesis came to be understood. In addition, we include a brief discussion of the discovery by Otto Warburg of the requirement for bicarbonate in the Hill reaction.

Antenna entropy in plant photosystems does not reduce the free energy for primary charge separation

We have investigated the concept of the so-called "antenna entropy" of higher plant photosystems. Several interesting points emerge: 1. In the case of a photosystemwhich harbours an excited state, the “antenna entropy” is equivalent to the configurational (mixing) entropy of a thermodynamic canonical ensemble. The energy associated with this parameter has been calculated for a hypothetical isoenergetic photosystem, photosystem I and photosystem II, and comes out in the range of 3.5 - 8% of the photon energy considering 680 nm. 2. The “antenna entropy” seems to be a rather unique thermodynamic phenomenon, in as much as it does not modify the free energy available for primary photochemistry, as has been previously suggested. 3. It is underlined that this configurational (mixing) entropy, unlike heat dispersal in a thermal system, does not involve energy dilution. This points out an important difference between thermal and electronic energy dispersal.