Effectiveness of a children's home and community-based services waiver program

1915(c) Medicaid Waivers for Children With Severe Emotional Disturbance: Participant Characteristics, Enrollment, and Out-of-Home Service Use

Several states have invested in 1915(c) Home and Community Based Service (HCBS) Medicaid policies to improve outcomes and reduce costs for children and youth with significant behavioral health needs, or Severe Emotional Disturbance (SED). However, little is known about these programs and the children they serve. Through a retrospective cross-sectional analysis, this study aimed to understand if the program was successfully reaching its target population: children and youth with the highest clinical need, at the greatest risk for out-of-home care, and who may not otherwise be eligible for Medicaid through other avenues. Results describe the demographic, clinical, and service use characteristics of children and youth enrolled in one SED Waiver program, comparing them with those of similar, non-waiver enrolled children with behavioral health needs. Findings report that the waiver program examined rarely served children and families not otherwise eligible for Medicaid, but that waiver-enrolled children and youth had substantially more severe clinical need, were at higher risk for out-of-home placement and incurred greater public expenditures for service use. Findings suggest the program studied is serving children with more significant psychiatric needs, as the program intends, but points to the need for further research to understand the impacts of such programs on system and clinical outcomes.

Medicaid Waivers for Youth with Severe Emotional Disturbance: Associations with Public Health Coverage, Unmet Mental Health Needs & Adequacy of Health Coverage

Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Medicaid waivers for Serious Emotional Disturbance (SED) extend Medicaid eligibility to youth who otherwise would be financially ineligible and finance a broad array of highly specialized mental health services specific to the needs of youth with SED. This study examines whether these policies are associated with greater public health insurance coverage among youth with severe mental health diagnoses. It also assesses, among youth with severe mental health diagnoses who have public health coverage, whether waiver policies are associated with reduced reports of unmet mental health treatment need and increased reports of adequate mental health coverage. Analysis uses CMS reported data on state HCBS Medicaid waivers in conjunction with data from the National Survey of Children's Health for the years 2016 through 2018. Multi-level, fixed-effects logistic regression models demonstrate that living in a state with an HCBS Medicaid waiver is associated with significantly increased odds of having public insurance among children with concurrent private health coverage (OR 1.89), reduced odds of unmet mental health needs among youth with public coverage (OR 0.45), but not significantly associated with reported adequacy of mental health insurance coverage.

State Approaches to Funding Home and Community-Based Mental Health Care for Non-Medicaid Youth: Alternatives to Medicaid Waivers

Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Medicaid waivers for children increase the availability of public funding for HCBS by waiving or expanding the means tests for parents' income, basing child eligibility for Medicaid coverage primarily on clinical need. But many states provide mechanisms apart from HCBS waivers to increase coverage for youth with significant mental health needs. Through interviews with public mental health officials from 37 states, this study identifies and explains non-waiver funding strategies for HCBS services for otherwise ineligible youth. Results demonstrate that states expand Medicaid-eligibility through CHIP or use state general revenue funds to pay for medically necessary HCBS for non-Medicaid youth.

Home- and community-based waivers for children with autism: effects on service use and costs

We examined (a) the associations between Medicaid home and community-based waiver participation and service use and expenditures among children with ASD; and (b) how states' waiver spending moderates these effects. We used 2005 Medicaid claims to identify a sample of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We selected two comparison groups who had no waiver participation: (a) children who were eligible for Medicaid through disability (disability group), and (b) children who had at least one inpatient/long-term care (IP/LT) episode (IP/LT group). Waiver participants were less likely to use IP/LT services and had lower associated expenditures than the disability group. As states' waiver spending increased, waiver participants became increasingly less likely to use IP/LT services. Waiver participants had more outpatient visits and associated expenditures; this difference increased as state waiver spending increased. Compared with the IP/LT group, waiver participants had lower IP/LT expenditures, more outpatient visits, and associated expenditures. Higher state waiver generosity increased this effect on outpatient visits and expenditures.

Maintaining Employment Among Caregivers of Individuals on a Medicaid Waitlist for Services

Many individuals with developmental or intellectual and other disabilities are on waitlists to receive supportive services through state Medicaid waiver programs. Being waitlisted can place considerable burden on the ability of a caregiver to maintain employment outside the home. This article reports on results of a survey of 442 caregivers of individuals waitlisted for services within the Florida Medicaid program. Logistic regression was used to model characteristics of caregiver and clients that are associated with the need for additional supports in order for the caregiver to maintain employment. Male caregivers and caregivers in fair or poor health were more likely to report needing support. Caregivers of clients who had behavior problems or problems with self-care were also more likely to need support to maintain employment. Policy responses to these findings include a call for increased supports or prioritization of services for caregivers who are in poor health or those who care for individuals with particularly problematic behaviors.