1
|
Ali A, Siddiqui AA, Shahid I, Van Spall HGC, Greene SJ, Fudim M, Khan MS. Prognostic value of quality of life and functional status in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Egypt Heart J 2024; 76:97. [PMID: 39101961 DOI: 10.1186/s43044-024-00532-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional health status is increasingly being recognized as a viable endpoint in heart failure (HF) trials. We sought to assess its prognostic impact and relationship with traditional clinical outcomes in patients with HF. METHODS MEDLINE and Cochrane central were searched up to January 2021 for post hoc analyses of trials or observational studies that assessed independent association between baseline health/functional status, and mortality and hospitalization in patients with HF across the range of left ventricular ejection fractions to evaluate the prognostic ability of NYHA class [II, III, IV], KCCQ, MLHFQ, and 6MWD. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals were pooled. RESULTS Twenty-two studies were included. Relative to NYHA I, NYHA class II (HR 1.54 [1.16-2.04]; p < 0.01), NYHA class III (HR 2.08 [1.57-2.77]; p < 0.01), and NYHA class IV (HR 2.53 [1.25-5.12]; p = 0.01) were independently associated with increased risk of mortality. 6MWD (per 10 m) was associated with decreased mortality (HR 0.98 [0.98-0.99]; p < 0.01). A 5-point increase in KCCQ-OSS (HR 0.94 [0.91-0.96]; p < 0.01) was associated with decreased mortality. A high MLHFQ score (> 45) was significantly associated with increased mortality (HR 1.30 [1.14-1.47]; p < 0.01). NHYA class, 6MWD (per 10 m), KCCQ-OSS, and MLHFQ all significantly associated with all-cause mortality in patients with HF. CONCLUSION Identifying such patients with poor health status using functional health assessment can offer a complementary assessment of disease burden and trajectory which carries a strong prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraish Ali
- Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Road, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Asad Ali Siddiqui
- Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Road, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan.
| | - Izza Shahid
- Division of Preventive Cardiology, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Harriette G C Van Spall
- Department of Medicine and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Research Institute of St Joe's, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen J Greene
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marat Fudim
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nabavizadeh B, Master VA. Let's ask the patient: Self-reported quality-of-life measures help to predict kidney cancer mortality. Cancer 2021; 128:447-448. [PMID: 34609747 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Behnam Nabavizadeh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Viraj A Master
- Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.,Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alam R, Patel HD, Su ZT, Cheaib JG, Ged Y, Singla N, Allaf ME, Pierorazio PM. Self-reported quality of life as a predictor of mortality in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 2021; 128:479-486. [PMID: 34609761 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the utility of self-reported quality of life (QOL) metrics in predicting mortality among all-comers with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and externally tested the findings in a registry of patients with small renal masses. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) captured QOL metrics composed of mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores. Regression models assessed associations of MCS and PCS with all-cause, RCC-specific, and non-RCC-specific mortality. Harrell's concordance statistic (the C-index) and the Akaike information criterion (AIC) determined predictive accuracy and parsimony, respectively. Findings were tested in the prospective Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses (DISSRM) registry. RESULTS In SEER-MHOS, 1494 patients had a median age of 73.4 years and a median follow-up time of 5.6 years. Each additional MCS and PCS point reduced the hazard of all-cause mortality by 1.3% (95% CI, 0.981-0.993; P < .001) and 2.3% (95% CI, 0.971-0.984; P < .001), respectively. Models with QOL metrics demonstrated higher predictive accuracy (C-index, 72.3% vs 70.1%) and parsimony (AIC, 9376.5 vs 9454.5) than models without QOL metrics. QOL metrics exerted a greater effect on non-RCC-specific mortality than RCC-specific mortality. External testing in the DISSRM registry confirmed these findings with similar results for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS Models with self-reported QOL metrics predicted all-cause mortality in patients with RCC with higher accuracy and parsimony than those without QOL metrics. Physical health was a stronger predictor of mortality than mental health. The findings support the incorporation of QOL metrics into prognostic models and patient counseling for RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ridwan Alam
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hiten D Patel
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Zhuo T Su
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph G Cheaib
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yasser Ged
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nirmish Singla
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mohamad E Allaf
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Phillip M Pierorazio
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tombal B, Saad F, Penson D, Hussain M, Sternberg CN, Morlock R, Ramaswamy K, Ivanescu C, Attard G. Patient-reported outcomes following enzalutamide or placebo in men with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (PROSPER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:556-569. [PMID: 30770294 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30898-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the PROSPER trial, enzalutamide significantly improved metastasis-free survival in patients with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here, we report the results of patient-reported outcomes of this study. METHODS In the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PROSPER trial, done at 254 study sites worldwide, patients aged 18 years or older with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of up to 10 months were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive voice web recognition system to receive oral enzalutamide (160 mg per day) or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by prostate-specific antigen doubling time and baseline use of a bone-targeting agent. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival, reported elsewhere. Secondary efficacy endpoints, reported here, were pain progression (assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form [BPI-SF] questionnaire) and health-related quality of life (assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ-PR25], the EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Levels health questionnaire visual analogue scale [EQ-5D-FL, EQ-VAS], and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate [FACT-P] questionnaires). Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, week 17, and every 16 weeks thereafter until treatment discontinuation. We used predefined questionnaire thresholds to identify clinically meaningful changes. Enrolment for PROSPER is complete and follow-up continues. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02003924. FINDINGS Between Nov 26, 2013, and June 28, 2017, 1401 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive enzalutamide (n=933) or placebo (n=468). Median follow-up was 18·5 months (IQR 10·7-29·2) in the enzalutamide group and 15·1 months (7·4-25·9) in the placebo group. Patient-reported outcome scores at baseline were similar between groups. Changes in least squares mean from baseline to week 97 favoured enzalutamide versus placebo for FACT-P social and family wellbeing (0·30 [95% CI -0·25 to 0·85] vs -0·64 [-1·51 to 0·24]; difference 0·94 [95% CI 0·02 to 1·85]; p=0·045) and disfavoured enzalutamide versus placebo for EORTC QLQ-PR25 hormonal treatment-related symptoms (1·55 [0·26 to 2·83) vs -1·83 [-3·86 to 0·20]; difference 3·38 [1·24 to 5·51]; p=0·0020); neither of these changes were clinically meaningful. No significant differences were observed between treatments for changes from baseline to week 97 in any other patient-reported outcome score. Time to clinically meaningful pain progression as assessed by BPI-SF pain severity was longer with enzalutamide than with placebo (median 36·83 months, [95% CI 34·69 to not reached [NR] vs NR; hazard ratio [HR] 0·75 [95% CI 0·57 to 0·97]; p=0·028); there was no significant difference for BPI-SF item 3 or pain interference. Time to clinically meaningful symptom worsening was longer with enzalutamide than with placebo for EORTC QLQ-PR25 urinary symptoms (median 36·86 months [95% CI 33·35 to NR] vs 25·86 [18·53 to 29·47]; HR 0·58 [95% CI 0·46 to 0·72]; p<0·0001) and bowel symptoms (33·15 [29·50 to NR] vs 25·89 [18·43 to 29·67]; 0·72 [0·59 to 0·89]; p=0·0018), and clinically meaningful health-related quality of life as assessed by FACT-P total score (22·11 [18·63 to 25·86] vs 18·43 [14·85-19·35]; 0·83 [0·69 to 0·99]; p=0·037), emotional wellbeing (36·73 [33·12 to 38·21] vs 29·47 [22·18 to 33·15]; 0·69 [0·55 to 0·86]; p=0·0008), and prostate cancer subscale (18·43 [14·85 to 18·66] vs 14·69 [11·07 to 16·20]; 0·79 [0·67 to 0·93]; p=0·0042), although there was no significant difference for other FACT-P scores. Time to clinically meaningful deterioration in EORTC QLQ-PR25 hormonal treatment-related symptoms was shorter with enzalutamide than with placebo (median 33·15 months [95% CI 29·60 to NR] vs 36·83 [29·47 to NR]; HR 1·29 [95% CI 1·02 to 1·63]; p=0·035). Time to deterioration of EQ-VAS was significantly longer for enzalutamide than for placebo (median 22·11 months [95% CI 18·46 to 25·66] vs 14·75 [11·07 to 18·17]; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·63 to 0·90]; p=0·0013). INTERPRETATION Patients with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide had longer metastasis-free survival than did those who received placebo, while maintaining low pain levels and prostate cancer symptom burden and high health-related quality of life. Enzalutamide showed a clinical benefit by delaying pain progression, symptom worsening, and decrease in functional status, compared with placebo. These findings suggest that enzalutamide is a treatment option that should be discussed with patients presenting with high-risk, non- metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. FUNDING Astellas Pharma Inc, Medivation LLC (a Pfizer Company).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Tombal
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal/CRCHUM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Penson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Maha Hussain
- Northwestern University Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
The association between health-related quality-of-life scores and clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: Exploratory analyses of AFFIRM and PREVAIL studies. Eur J Cancer 2017; 87:21-29. [PMID: 29096157 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our exploratory analysis examined the association between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (baseline and change over time) and clinical outcomes (overall survival [OS]/radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS]) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS HRQoL, OS and rPFS were assessed in phase III trials comparing enzalutamide with placebo in chemotherapy-naïve (PREVAIL; NCT01212991) or post-chemotherapy (AFFIRM; NCT00974311) mCRPC. HRQoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P). Multivariate analyses evaluated the prognostic significance of baseline and time-dependent scores after adjusting for treatment and clinical/demographic variables. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) represented the hazard of rPFS or OS per minimally important difference (MID) score change in HRQoL variables. RESULTS In baseline and time-dependent multivariate analyses, OS was independently associated with multiple HRQoL measures across both studies. In time-dependent analyses, a 10-point (upper bound of MID range) increase (improvement) in FACT-P total score was associated with reductions in mortality risk of 19% in AFFIRM (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.78-0.84]) and 21% in PREVAIL (HR 0.79 [0.76-0.83]). For baseline analyses, a 10-point increase in FACT-P total score was associated with reductions in mortality risk of 12% (HR 0.88 [0.84-0.93]) and 10% (HR 0.90 [0.86-0.95]) in AFFIRM and PREVAIL, respectively. rPFS was associated with a subset of HRQoL domains in both studies. CONCLUSION Several baseline HRQoL domains were prognostic for rPFS and OS in patients with mCRPC, and this association was maintained during treatment, indicating that changes in HRQoL are informative for patients' expected survival.
Collapse
|
6
|
Phippen NT, Secord AA, Wolf S, Samsa G, Davidson B, Abernethy AP, Cella D, Havrilesky LJ, Burger RA, Monk BJ, Leath CA. Quality of life is significantly associated with survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: An ancillary data analysis of the NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG-0218) study. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 147:98-103. [PMID: 28743369 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2017] [Revised: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate association between baseline quality of life (QOL) and changes in QOL measured by FACT-O TOI with progression-free disease (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS Patients enrolled in GOG-0218 with completed FACT-O TOI assessments at baseline and at least one follow-up assessment were eligible. Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were sorted by quartiles (Q1-4) and outcomes compared between Q1 and Q2-4 with log-rank statistic and multivariate Cox regression adjusting for age, stage, post-surgical residual disease size, and performance status (PS). Trends in FACT-O TOI scores from baseline to the latest follow-up assessment were evaluated for impact on intragroup (Q1 or Q2-4) outcome by log-rank analysis. RESULTS Of 1152 eligible patients, 283 formed Q1 and 869 formed Q2-4. Mean baseline FACT-O TOI scores were 47.5 for Q1 vs. 74.7 for Q2-4 (P<0.001). Q1 compared to Q2-4 had worse median OS (37.5 vs. 45.6months, P=0.001) and worse median PFS (12.5 vs. 13.1months, P=0.096). Q2-4 patients had decreased risks of disease progression (HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.953-0.995, P=0.018), and death (HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.939-0.987, P=0.003) for each five-point increase in baseline FACT-O TOI. Improving versus worsening trends in FACT-O TOI scores were associated with longer median PFS (Q1: 12.7 vs. 8.6months, P=0.001; Q2-4: 16.7 vs. 11.1months, P<0.001) and median OS (Q1: 40.8 vs. 16months, P<0.001; Q2-4: 54.4 vs. 33.6months, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were independently prognostic of PFS and OS while improving compared to worsening QOL was associated with significantly better PFS and OS in women with EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N T Phippen
- Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - A A Secord
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - S Wolf
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - G Samsa
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - B Davidson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - A P Abernethy
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - D Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - L J Havrilesky
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - R A Burger
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - B J Monk
- Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Creighton University, USA
| | - C A Leath
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garvin P, Nilsson E, Ernerudh J, Kristenson M. The joint subclinical elevation of CRP and IL-6 is associated with lower health-related quality of life in comparison with no elevation or elevation of only one of the biomarkers. Qual Life Res 2015. [PMID: 26195318 PMCID: PMC4706574 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1068-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), like the Short Form (SF)-36, have been suggested to correlate with inflammatory biomarkers. It is, however, unclear whether a joint measure of two inflammatory biomarkers would bring additional information in comparison with evaluation of one inflammatory biomarker. Objective To evaluate associations between SF-36 and low-grade inflammation in a Swedish population, with emphasis on a combined measure of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) as a proxy for low-grade inflammation. Methods In a randomly selected sample of a middle-aged Swedish general population (n = 905; aged 45–69 years, 50 % women), relations between SF-36 parameters and the biomarkers were tested. Regression and correlation analyses were adjusted for sex, age, presence of disease, lifestyle, and psychological factors. Results After adjustment for sex and age, HRQoL was significantly lower in the group with a joint elevation of CRP and IL-6 in comparison with either the group with no elevation or the groups showing elevation of one of the two biomarkers. Also after full adjustments, the combined measure of elevated CRP and IL-6, with few exceptions, was associated with significantly lower HRQoL in comparison with elevations in one of them, difference ranging from 4 (Mental Health scale) to 18 scale steps (Role-Physical scale). Conclusion This study confirms that there is a relationship between HRQoL and low-grade inflammation. In particular, SF-36 scores are significantly lower in a group with joint elevation of IL-6 and CRP, in comparison with elevation of either one of them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Garvin
- Unit of Research and Development in Local Health Care (FoU-enheten för Närsjukvården i Östegötland), County of Östergötland, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden. .,Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Evalill Nilsson
- Unit of Research and Development in Local Health Care (FoU-enheten för Närsjukvården i Östegötland), County of Östergötland, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.,Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Jan Ernerudh
- Division of Neuro and Inflammatory Sciences, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Margareta Kristenson
- Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xie G, Laskowitz DT, Turner EL, Egger JR, Shi P, Ren F, Gao W, Wu Y. Baseline health-related quality of life and 10-year all-cause mortality among 1739 Chinese adults. PLoS One 2014; 9:e101527. [PMID: 25007092 PMCID: PMC4090174 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2014] [Accepted: 06/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) may be associated with the longevity of patients; yet it is not clear whether this association holds in a general population, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of this study was to determine whether baseline HRQOL was associated with 10-year all-cause mortality in a Chinese general population. METHODS A prospective cohort study was conducted from 2002 to 2012 on 1739 participants in 11 villages of Beijing. Baseline data on six domains of HRQOL, chronic diseases and cardiovascular risk factors were collected in either 2002 (n = 1290) or 2005 (n = 449). Subjects were followed through the end of the study period, or until they were censored due to death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first. RESULTS A multivariable Cox model estimated that Total HRQOL score (bottom 50% versus top 50%) was associated with a 44% increase in all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-2.06), after adjusting for sex, age, education levels, occupation, marital status, smoking status, fruit intake, vegetable intake, physical exercise, hypertension, history of a stroke, myocardial infarction, chronic respiratory disease, and kidney disease. Among the six HRQOL domains, the Independence domain had the largest fully adjusted HR (HR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.13-2.42), followed by Psychological (HR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.03-2.09), Environmental (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.003-2.03), Physical (HR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.97-1.95), General (HR = 1.37; 95% CI: 0.97-1.94), and the Social domain (HR = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.81-1.65). CONCLUSION Lower HRQOL, especially the inability to live independently, was associated with a significantly increased risk of 10-year all-cause mortality. The inclusion of HRQOL measures in clinical assessment may improve diagnostic accuracy to improve clinical outcomes and better target public health promotions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaoqiang Xie
- Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- * E-mail: (YW); (GX)
| | - Daniel T. Laskowitz
- Department of Neurology, Duke University Medicine Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth L. Turner
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Joseph R. Egger
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ping Shi
- Shijingshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Fuxiu Ren
- Shijingshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Sciences, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yangfeng Wu
- Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China
- The George Institute for Global Health at Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
- * E-mail: (YW); (GX)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen RC, Chang P, Vetter RJ, Lukka H, Stokes WA, Sanda MG, Watkins-Bruner D, Reeve BB, Sandler HM. Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in prostate cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju132. [PMID: 25006192 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life Steering Committee convened four working groups to recommend core sets of patient-reported outcomes to be routinely incorporated in clinical trials. The Prostate Cancer Working Group included physicians, researchers, and a patient advocate. The group's process included 1) a systematic literature review to determine the prevalence and severity of symptoms, 2) a multistakeholder meeting sponsored by the NCI to review the evidence and build consensus, and 3) a postmeeting expert panel synthesis of findings to finalize recommendations. Five domains were recommended for localized prostate cancer: urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction and irritation, bowel-related symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and hormonal symptoms. Four domains were recommended for advanced prostate cancer: pain, fatigue, mental well-being, and physical well-being. Additional domains for consideration include decisional regret, satisfaction with care, and anxiety related to prostate cancer. These recommendations have been endorsed by the NCI for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald C Chen
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS).
| | - Peter Chang
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Richard J Vetter
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Himansu Lukka
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - William A Stokes
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Martin G Sanda
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Deborah Watkins-Bruner
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Howard M Sandler
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Joint models for predicting transplant-related mortality from quality of life data. Qual Life Res 2013; 24:31-9. [PMID: 24129669 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0550-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/01/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test whether longitudinally measured health-related quality of life (HRQL) predicts transplant-related mortality (TRM) in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). METHODS The predictors of interest were emotional functioning, physical functioning, role functioning, and global HRQL, as rated by the parent about the child up to 6 times over 12 months of follow-up and measured by the Child Health Ratings Inventories. We used joint models, specifically shared parameter models, with time to TRM as the outcome of interest and other causes of mortality as a competing risk, via the JM software package in R. Choosing shared parameter models instead of standard survival models, such as Cox models with time-dependent covariates, enabled us to address measurement error in the HRQL trajectories and appropriately handle missing data. The nonlinear trajectories for each HRQL domain were modeled by random spline functions. The survival submodels were adjusted for baseline patient, family, and transplant characteristics. RESULTS Hazard ratios per one-half standard deviation difference in emotional, physical, and role functioning, and global HRQL were 0.61 (95 % CI 0.46-0.81; p < 0.001), 0.70 (0.51-0.96; p = 0.03), 0.54 (0.34-0.85; p = 0.007), and 0.57 (0.41-0.79; p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS HRQL trajectories were predictive of TRM in pediatric HSCT, even after adjusting the survival outcome for baseline characteristics.
Collapse
|
11
|
Möller A, Sartipy U. Quality of life six months after lung cancer surgery is associated with long-term survival. Acta Oncol 2012; 51:1029-35. [PMID: 22663251 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2012.689112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the association between quality of life six months following lung cancer surgery and survival. METHODS In a prospective population-based cohort study, quality of life was estimated by the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire before and six months after surgery for lung cancer. Cox regression models adjusting for potential confounding factors were used to analyze the association between SF-36 scores six months after surgery and survival. We also estimated the risk of death in patients scoring below the normal population mean at six months after surgery. RESULTS We included 249 patients, and 79 patients were excluded because of histopathology other than primary lung cancer. After six months, 11 patients had died, and 18 patients did not respond to the second SF-36 questionnaire, leaving a study population of 141 patients with SF-36 data from both baseline and follow-up. During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 35 deaths occurred. The SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores assessed at six months after lung cancer surgery were significantly associated with survival. Mental component summary scores below the mean of the age- and gender-matched normal population were associated with a three-fold increase in the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS Quality of life scores six months after surgery contained prognostic information regarding long-term survival that was independent of baseline scores. If these findings can be validated, cross-sectional post-treatment measurements of quality of life can prove valuable, especially when baseline information is unavailable.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wong J, Taljaard M, Forster AJ, van Walraven C. Does adding risk-trends to survival models improve in-hospital mortality predictions? A cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11:171. [PMID: 21777460 PMCID: PMC3161846 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2011] [Accepted: 07/21/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinicians informally assess changes in patients' status over time to prognosticate their outcomes. The incorporation of trends in patient status into regression models could improve their ability to predict outcomes. In this study, we used a unique approach to measure trends in patient hospital death risk and determined whether the incorporation of these trend measures into a survival model improved the accuracy of its risk predictions. Methods We included all adult inpatient hospitalizations between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2009 at our institution. We used the daily mortality risk scores from an existing time-dependent survival model to create five trend indicators: absolute and relative percent change in the risk score from the previous day; absolute and relative percent change in the risk score from the start of the trend; and number of days with a trend in the risk score. In the derivation set, we determined which trend indicators were associated with time to death in hospital, independent of the existing covariates. In the validation set, we compared the predictive performance of the existing model with and without the trend indicators. Results Three trend indicators were independently associated with time to hospital mortality: the absolute change in the risk score from the previous day; the absolute change in the risk score from the start of the trend; and the number of consecutive days with a trend in the risk score. However, adding these trend indicators to the existing model resulted in only small improvements in model discrimination and calibration. Conclusions We produced several indicators of trend in patient risk that were significantly associated with time to hospital death independent of the model used to create them. In other survival models, our approach of incorporating risk trends could be explored to improve their performance without the collection of additional data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Wong
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sadetsky N, Greene K, Cooperberg MR, Hubbard A, Carroll PR, Satariano W. Impact of androgen deprivation on physical well-being in patients with prostate cancer: analysis from the CaPSURE (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor) registry. Cancer 2011; 117:4406-13. [PMID: 21412760 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2010] [Revised: 12/28/2010] [Accepted: 02/01/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) becomes a standard of treatment for men with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer, evaluation of adverse effects associated with this treatment is needed. In this study, the authors evaluated the effect of ADT administered as monotherapy and in combination with local treatment on physical well-being in a longitudinal sample of men with prostate cancer. METHODS Exposure to ADT was defined by 3 groups: local (local treatment only), combination (local treatment with adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant ADT), and primary ADT. Associations between exposure to ADT and physical well-being measured by self-reported health-related quality of life outcomes over time were evaluated by repeated measures analysis using mixed modeling. Estimates adjusted for various clinical and demographic variables are reported. RESULTS A total of 2922 men, who completed both pretreatment and follow-up health-related quality of life assessment, were identified from the CaPSURE (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor) registry. During 24 months of follow-up, exposure to ADT was associated with worse physical well-being compared with local treatment at all time points (P < .001). Being exposed to ADT as primary therapy was associated with more severe declines compared with combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS The potential consequence of decline in physical well-being in patients exposed to ADT has to be included in treatment decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Sadetsky
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The measurement of patient-reported outcomes, including health-related quality of life, is a new initiative which has emerged and grown over the past four decades. Following the development of reliable and valid self-report questionnaires, health-related quality of life has been assessed in tens of thousands of patients and a wide variety of cancers. This review is based on a selection of data published in the last decade and is intended primarily for healthcare professionals. The assessments in clinical trials have been particularly useful for elucidating the effects of various cancers and their treatments on patients' lives and have provided additional information that enhances the usual clinical endpoints used for determining the benefits and toxicity of treatment. With growing experience the quality of the health-related quality of studies has improved and, in general, recent studies are more likely to be methodologically robust than those that were performed in earlier decades. Health-related quality of life has become a more accurate predictor of survival than some other clinical parameters, such as performance status. The overall outlook for the routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials is assured and, eventually, it is likely to become a standard part of clinical practice. However, there is still a need for a clear method for determining the clinical meaningfulness of changes in scores. The answer will probably come from the greater use of patient-reported outcomes and the consequent growth of experience that is necessary to make such judgements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Osoba
- Professor (retired), Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, and Quality of Life Consulting, West Vancouver, BC, Canada; 4939 Edendale Court, West Vancouver, BC, Canada V7W 3H7
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Porten SP, Cooperberg MR, Konety BR, Carroll PR. The example of CaPSURE: lessons learned from a national disease registry. World J Urol 2011; 29:265-71. [PMID: 21347810 PMCID: PMC3099175 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0658-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2010] [Accepted: 02/02/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for determining evidence-based clinical practices, large disease registries that enroll large numbers of patients have become paramount as a relatively cost-effective additional tool. Methods We highlight the advantages of disease registries focusing on the example of prostate cancer and the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE™) registry. Results CaPSURE collects approximately 1,000 clinical and patient-reported variables, in over 13,000 men that are enrolled. Thus far, CaPSURE has yielded over 130 peer-reviewed publications, with several others in press, in key areas of risk migration, practice patterns, outcome prediction, and quality of life outcomes. Conclusions Disease registries, like CaPSURE complement RCTs and CaPSURE, have provided a means to better understand many aspects of prostate cancer epidemiology, practice patterns, oncologic and HRQOL outcomes, and costs of care across populations. Specialized observational disease registries such as CaPSURE provide insight and have broad implications for disease management and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sima P Porten
- Department of Urology, UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nilsson E, Kristenson M. Psychological factors related to physical, social, and mental dimensions of the SF-36: a population-based study of middle-aged women and men. PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES 2010; 1:153-62. [PMID: 22915961 PMCID: PMC3417915 DOI: 10.2147/prom.s13209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2010] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background: Measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are increasingly used as patient-reported outcome measures in routine health care. Research on determinants and correlates of HRQoL has, therefore, grown in importance. Earlier studies have generally been patient-based and few of them have examined differences between women and men. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between psychological factors and physical, social, and mental dimensions of HRQoL, as measured by the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), in a normal population and to see if observed relations were the same for women and men. Methods: Relations between scale scores for the eight scales of SF-36 and scale scores for Self-esteem, Sense of Coherence, Perceived Control, Depressed Mood (CES-D), and Cynicism were assessed through partial correlation and multiple linear regression analyses on a sample of 505 women and 502 men (aged 45–69 years), stratified for sex and adjusted for effects of age, presence of disease, back pain, lifestyle, and social support. Results: All psychological factors tested, except Cynicism, were significantly correlated to all scales of the SF-36 for women and men (Pearson product-moment partial correlation coefficient, |r| = 0.11–0.63 and |r| = 0.11–0.60, respectively). The addition of psychological factors into regression models resulted in significant total explained variance (R2) changes in all scales of the SF-36 for both sexes. Any discrepancies between women and men pertained more to the strength of relationships rather than the significance of different psychological factors. Conclusion: In this population-based study, psychological factors showed significant correlation, for women and men alike, with the physical and social scales of SF-36, as well as the mental scales. These findings suggest that assessments of HRQoL are not merely a measure of absolute function but are also dependent on people’s perception of their ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evalill Nilsson
- Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Many options exist for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In the decision to choose a therapeutic option for localized disease, many variables need to be considered such as tumor characteristics, clinical stage, the patient's overall health and life expectancy, and preferences of both the physician and patient. Another important consideration is the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) implications of a given treatment option. The importance of HRQOL relative to the potential side effects of prostate cancer treatments has grown over the past few years. Although our collective awareness has increased, objective data on HRQOL for prostate cancer treatment are lacking due to a paucity of prospective clinical trial data. This review defines the concept of HRQOL, discusses what is currently known about the impact of various treatments on HRQOL, and summarizes the recent literature in this area relating to the management of localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
18
|
Current World Literature. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2010; 4:207-27. [DOI: 10.1097/spc.0b013e32833e8160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
19
|
Colloca G, Colloca P. Health-related quality of life assessment in prospective trials of systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: which instrument we need? Med Oncol 2010; 28:519-27. [PMID: 20354822 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-010-9495-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2010] [Accepted: 03/11/2010] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Knowledge about psychological health of men with prostate cancer is still limited. HRQoL assessment adds value in symptom management by allowing a broader understanding of the impact of symptom management beyond the targeted symptom, on functioning, and on overall QoL. In this paper, the results of the commonly used HRQoL questionnaires in phase III randomized clinical trials of chemotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has been discussed. An overview about symptom burden, treatments and HRQoL domains, a description of available HRQoL instruments used for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were reported. Finally, the characteristics of most commonly used HRQoL instruments were identified and compared. To provide better empirical justification for the selection of HRQoL instruments, head-to-head comparisons of them within the same studies are needed. Estimating a minimal important difference could be significant when interpreting trial results. The impact of HRQoL scores in clinical practice remains unclear; poor communication of clinical significance of the results and limited training of clinicians are the most important barriers to a widespread use of HRQoL questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Colloca
- Division of Medical Oncology, ASL-1 Imperiese, Via G. Borea 56, 18038, Sanremo, Imperia, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|