1
|
Youn SJ, Jaso B, Eyllon M, Sah P, Hoyler G, Barnes JB, Jarama K, Murillo L, O'Dea H, Orth L, Pennine M, Rogers E, Welch G, Nordberg SS. Leveraging Implementation Science to Integrate Digital Mental Health Interventions as part of Routine Care in a Practice Research Network. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024; 51:348-357. [PMID: 37615809 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01292-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
The supply / demand issue in behavioral health care is a well-established fact, and the mental health toll of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to add challenges to an already taxed system. Existing healthcare models are not set up to adequately address the increasing mental health related needs. As such, innovative models are needed to provide patients with access to appropriate, evidence-based behavioral health care within routine clinical care. This paper introduces Precision Behavioral Health (PBH) as an example of such a model. PBH is an innovative, digital first care delivery model that provides an ecosystem of evidence-based digital mental health interventions to patients as a frontline behavioral health treatment within routine care in a large multispecialty group medical center in the United States. This paper describes the implementation of PBH within a practice research network set-up as part of an integrated behavioral health department. We will present how our team leveraged the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance; "What is RE-AIM?," n.d.) implementation science framework, which emphasizes the design, dissemination, and implementation processes at the individual, staff, and organizational levels, to prioritize key implementation constructs to enhance the successful integration of PBH within routine care. We describe how each of these constructs were operationalized to aid data gathering for rapid evaluation and lessons learned. We discuss the benefits of these types of initiatives across multiple stakeholders including patients, providers, organizations, payers, and digital intervention vendors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Jeong Youn
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Harvard Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | - Brittany Jaso
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Mara Eyllon
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Pratha Sah
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Georgia Hoyler
- Corporate Office of Strategy & Innovation, United Health Group, Minnetonka, MN, USA
| | - John Ben Barnes
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Kevin Jarama
- Corporate Office of Strategy & Innovation, United Health Group, Minnetonka, MN, USA
| | - Lily Murillo
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Heather O'Dea
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Laura Orth
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | | | - George Welch
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
McAleavey AA, de Jong K, Nissen-Lie HA, Boswell JF, Moltu C, Lutz W. Routine Outcome Monitoring and Clinical Feedback in Psychotherapy: Recent Advances and Future Directions. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024; 51:291-305. [PMID: 38329643 PMCID: PMC11076375 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01351-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
In the past decade, there has been an increase in research related to the routine collection and active use of standardized patient data in psychotherapy. Research has increasingly focused on personalization of care to patients, clinical skills and interventions that modulate treatment outcomes, and implementation strategies, all of which appear to enhance the beneficial effects of ROM and feedback. In this article, we summarize trends and recent advances in the research on this topic and identify several essential directions for the field in the short to medium term. We anticipate a broadening of research from the focus on average effects to greater specificity around what kinds of feedback, provided at what time, to which individuals, in what settings, are most beneficial. We also propose that the field needs to focus on issues of health equity, ensuring that ROM can be a vehicle for increased wellbeing for those who need it most. The complexity of mental healthcare systems means that there may be multiple viable measurement solutions with varying costs and benefits to diverse stakeholders in different treatment contexts, and research is needed to identify the most influential components in each of these contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A McAleavey
- Helse Førde Hospital Trust, Svanehaugvegen 2, Førde, 6812, Norway.
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Førde, Norway.
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Kim de Jong
- Institute of Psychology, Clinical Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - James F Boswell
- Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Christian Moltu
- Helse Førde Hospital Trust, Svanehaugvegen 2, Førde, 6812, Norway
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Førde, Norway
| | - Wolfgang Lutz
- Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Douglas S, Page AC, Moltu C, Kyron M, Satterthwaite T. The Connections Matter: Bi-Directional Learning in Program Evaluation and Practice-Oriented Research. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024; 51:318-335. [PMID: 37768486 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01304-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Intended for researchers and clinical leaders, this article suggests that embedded program evaluation is a good fit with the desired features of practice-oriented research. The systematic nature of evaluation that is built into the operational workflow of a practice setting may increase the diversity of methods available to explore processes and outcomes of interest. We propose a novel conceptual framework that uses a human-centered systems lens to foster such embedded evaluation in clinical routine. This approach emphasizes the evaluator-practitioner partnership to build confidence in the bi-directional learning of practice-based evidence with evidence-based practice. The iterative cycles inherent to design thinking are aimed at developing better evaluation questions. The attention to structure and context inherent to systems thinking is intended to support meaningful perspectives in the naturally complex world of health care. Importantly, the combined human-centered systems lens can create greater awareness of the influence of individual and systemic biases that exist in any endeavor or institution that involves people. Recommended tools and strategies include systems mapping, program theory development, and visual facilitation using a logic model to represent the complexity of mental health treatment for communication, shared understanding, and connection to the broader evidence base. To illustrate elements of the proposed conceptual framework, two case examples are drawn from routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and progress feedback. We conclude with questions for future collaboration and research that may strengthen the partnership of evaluators and practitioners as a community of learners in service of local and system-level improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, 230 Appleton Place PMB #414, Nashville, TN, 37203-5721, USA.
| | - Andrew C Page
- School of Psychological Science and WA Mental Health Research Centre, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Christian Moltu
- District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Førde, Norway
| | - Michael Kyron
- School of Psychological Science and WA Mental Health Research Centre, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Helleseth MM, McAleavey AA, Moltu C. Case report: A dual case study of how clinical feedback can be a communication aide and influence therapeutic work. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1199431. [PMID: 38152559 PMCID: PMC10752420 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback may improve outcomes after psychotherapy, results from efficiency studies have been mixed. Moreover, how clinical feedback is implemented influences how it works for patients and clinicians, and working mechanisms are hitherto not thoroughly explored. Researchers have argued that inviting and using feedback from patients is best conceived of as a clinical skill. In this paper, we use case study methodology to explore and describe feedback's functions within three clinical skill themes: actualizing alliance work, concretizing change and stagnation and verbalizing the non-verbal. Case presentation Sonja is a young adult patient with a trauma background. She has a history of serious suicide attempts and distrust in relationships. She attended psychotherapy for eight months. Harald is a middle-aged man with a stable family. Traumatic events in his past has made him conceal own needs and developing depression. He attended psychotherapy for 19 months. Case material include the patient's clinical feedback over a range of life areas, medical health notes and the therapist's process notes. Conclusion Clinical feedback can be a positive supplement to the therapeutic work and process. The importance of making this as a joint tool between the client and the therapist is significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christian Moltu
- District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barkham M, De Jong K, Delgadillo J, Lutz W. Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and Feedback: Research Review and Recommendations. Psychother Res 2023:1-15. [PMID: 36931228 DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2023.2181114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a research review of the components and outcomes of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and recommendations for research and therapeutic practice. METHOD A narrative review of the three phases of ROM - data collection, feeding back data, and adapting therapy - and an overview of patient outcomes from 11 meta-analytic studies. RESULTS Patients support ROM when its purpose is clear and integrated within therapy. Greater frequency of data collection is more important for shorter-term therapies, and use of graphs, greater specificity of feedback, and alerts are helpful. Overall effects on patient outcomes are statistically significant (g ≈ 0.15) and increase when clinical support tools (CSTs) are used for not-on-track cases (g ≈ 0.36-0.53). Effects are additive to standard effects of psychological therapies. Organizational, personnel, and resource issues remain the greatest obstacles to the successful adoption of ROM. CONCLUSION ROM offers a low-cost method for enhancing patient outcomes, on average resulting in an ≈ 8% advantage (success rate difference; SRD) over standard care. CSTs are particularly effective for not-on-track patients (SRD between ≈ 20% and 29%), but ROM does not work for all patients and successful implementation is a major challenge, along with securing appropriate cultural adaptations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Barkham
- Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kim De Jong
- Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jaime Delgadillo
- Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Wolfgang Lutz
- Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aafjes-van Doorn K, de Jong K. How to make the most of routine outcome monitoring (ROM): A multitude of clinical decisions and nuances to consider. J Clin Psychol 2022; 78:2054-2065. [PMID: 36041193 DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) involves the use of patient-reported standardized outcome measures to monitor progress throughout the course of treatment, followed by feedback of the patient's scores to the therapist. The potential benefits of ROM have been established, however, from our own experiences, we know that the implementation in clinical practice can be challenging. We therefore wanted to explore in more detail exactly how we might be able to apply ROM in difficult clinical contexts. The inspiring case illustrations in this issue of Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session highlight the heterogeneity in ROM systems, and the way in which ROM can be used in treatment. Just as there are many ways of interpreting a survey data-point, there are also many ways in which ROM may be used to complement the treatment and supervision. Whether or not ROM is implemented may partly be determined by clinic policies and routines, but there remain a multitude of clinical decisions that require careful consideration by the individual therapist. To complement the evidence supporting the benefits of using ROM, further empirical support and clinical guidance is needed on how exactly therapists are to use ROM in their work and how ROM may be used in evidence-based practice. We make suggestions for additional uses of ROM for deliberate practice, and teletherapy practice, and look toward novel ways of assessing progress in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim de Jong
- Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aafjes-Van Doorn K, Meisel J. Implementing routine outcome monitoring in a psychodynamic training clinic: it’s complicated. COUNSELLING PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/09515070.2022.2110451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jordan Meisel
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Outcome measurement in the field of psychotherapy has developed considerably in the last decade. This review discusses key issues related to outcome measurement, modeling, and implementation of data-informed and measurement-based psychological therapy. First, an overview is provided, covering the rationale of outcome measurement by acknowledging some of the limitations of clinical judgment. Second, different models of outcome measurement are discussed, including pre-post, session-by-session, and higher-resolution intensive outcome assessments. Third, important concepts related to modeling patterns of change are addressed, including early response, dose-response, and nonlinear change. Furthermore, rational and empirical decision tools are discussed as the foundation for measurement-based therapy. Fourth, examples of clinical applications are presented, which show great promise to support the personalization of therapy and to prevent treatment failure. Finally, we build on continuous outcome measurement as the basis for a broader understanding of clinical concepts and data-driven clinical practice in the future. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Volume 18 is May 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Lutz
- Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany;
| | - Brian Schwartz
- Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany;
| | - Jaime Delgadillo
- Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boehnke JR, Rutherford C. Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:3007-3013. [PMID: 34635961 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03008-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jan R Boehnke
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, City Campus, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, DD1 4HJ, UK.
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moltu C, McAleavey AA, Helleseth MM, Møller GH, Nordberg SS. How therapists and patients need to develop a clinical feedback system after 18 months of use in a practice-research network: a qualitative study. Int J Ment Health Syst 2021; 15:43. [PMID: 33975630 PMCID: PMC8111973 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-021-00465-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A personalized computer-adaptive system for clinical feedback and routine outcome monitoring in mental health, Norse Feedback aims to bridge the needs for standardized and idiographic measures in ordinary practice. METHODS Item response theory analyses of completed treatment processes (n = 800) informed a qualitative study comprising individual in-depth interviews and focus groups with patients (n = 9) and clinicians (n = 10). The research question was: How do clinicians and patients contribute to developing a clinical feedback system in a continuous process aimed at refining its clinical usefulness? RESULTS We conducted thematic analyses and found five themes: 1. Added clinical needs, 2. Needs for re-organizing the clinician report, 3.Needs for differentiation of clinical content, 4. User-interface needs, and 5. Item level suggestions. CONCLUSION In this article, we detail resulting needs for continuous adaptation to practice, and discuss implications of the concrete experiences with the Norse action research program for the larger field of ROM/CFS implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Moltu
- Department of Psychiatry, District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway. .,Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Førde, Norway.
| | - Andrew A McAleavey
- Department of Psychiatry, District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Geir Helge Møller
- Department of Psychiatry, District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway
| | - Sam S Nordberg
- Department of Psychiatry, District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway
| |
Collapse
|