1
|
McAleavey AA, de Jong K, Nissen-Lie HA, Boswell JF, Moltu C, Lutz W. Routine Outcome Monitoring and Clinical Feedback in Psychotherapy: Recent Advances and Future Directions. Adm Policy Ment Health 2024:10.1007/s10488-024-01351-9. [PMID: 38329643 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01351-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
In the past decade, there has been an increase in research related to the routine collection and active use of standardized patient data in psychotherapy. Research has increasingly focused on personalization of care to patients, clinical skills and interventions that modulate treatment outcomes, and implementation strategies, all of which appear to enhance the beneficial effects of ROM and feedback. In this article, we summarize trends and recent advances in the research on this topic and identify several essential directions for the field in the short to medium term. We anticipate a broadening of research from the focus on average effects to greater specificity around what kinds of feedback, provided at what time, to which individuals, in what settings, are most beneficial. We also propose that the field needs to focus on issues of health equity, ensuring that ROM can be a vehicle for increased wellbeing for those who need it most. The complexity of mental healthcare systems means that there may be multiple viable measurement solutions with varying costs and benefits to diverse stakeholders in different treatment contexts, and research is needed to identify the most influential components in each of these contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A McAleavey
- Helse Førde Hospital Trust, Svanehaugvegen 2, Førde, 6812, Norway.
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Førde, Norway.
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Kim de Jong
- Institute of Psychology, Clinical Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - James F Boswell
- Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Christian Moltu
- Helse Førde Hospital Trust, Svanehaugvegen 2, Førde, 6812, Norway
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Førde, Norway
| | - Wolfgang Lutz
- Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Young J, Jimenez A, Pruett M, Hancock L, Schruff M. A randomized controlled trial of analogue pharmacogenomic testing feedback for psychotropic medications. PEC Innov 2023; 2:100119. [PMID: 37214496 PMCID: PMC10194257 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective To examine the impact of various presentations of pharmacogenomic testing results using a published, color-coded decision support tool (DST) format as a standard stimulus to list possible medications. Methods Participants were randomly assigned to groups and asked to decide which psychotropic medication they would prefer if depressed. Three of the groups varied the color-coded category of fluoxetine and received a statement indicating that this was the most prescribed drug for depression. A fourth control condition omitted base rate information. Participants also provided detail about their decision-making processes through a qualitative interview. Results Comparison of the first three groups indicated that significantly more participants selected medications from the highest category of likely effectiveness when fluoxetine appeared in this list. Comparison of the control group to its relevant analogue suggested no significant differences in selection strategy. Qualitative interview responses indicated participant comfort with genetic testing despite awareness of having very limited understanding of these techniques and their implications. Conclusions Both DST color-coding and base rates were influential in driving drug selection decisions, despite most participants indicating they did not understand this information. Innovation Efforts to standardize pharmacogenomic stimuli may lead to advances in methods of studying quantifiable healthcare decisions. Attention to the context for presenting test results may also be a useful source of understanding patient responses, particularly regarding complex tests that are likely to be interpreted heuristically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Young
- University of Mississippi, Department of Psychology, 207 Peabody Hall, University, MS 38677, USA
| | - Aileen Jimenez
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Pharmacy, 301 Pharmacy Lane, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Madeline Pruett
- University of Mississippi, Department of Psychology, 207 Peabody Hall, University, MS 38677, USA
| | - Laken Hancock
- University of Mississippi, Department of Psychology, 207 Peabody Hall, University, MS 38677, USA
| | - McCall Schruff
- University of Mississippi, Department of Psychology, 207 Peabody Hall, University, MS 38677, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schiffman J, Horton LE, Landa Y, Woods SW. Considerations for providing feedback to patients and families regarding clinical high-risk for psychosis status. Schizophr Res 2022; 244:55-57. [PMID: 35597133 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.01.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leslie E Horton
- University of Pittsburgh Department of Psychiatry, United States of America
| | - Yulia Landa
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States of America
| | - Scott W Woods
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tagle L, Shen M, Leininger L, Kim GJ. Flipping the feedback script: Using a bottom-up feedback tool in surgical education. Am J Surg 2021; 222:1178-1179. [PMID: 34030868 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lorena Tagle
- University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Mary Shen
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Lisa Leininger
- Graduate Medical Education, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Grace J Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bowen JL, Chiovaro J, O'Brien BC, Boscardin CK, Irby DM, Ten Cate O. Exploring current physicians' failure to communicate clinical feedback back to transferring physicians after transitions of patient care responsibility: A mixed methods study. Perspect Med Educ 2020; 9:236-244. [PMID: 32514883 PMCID: PMC7459044 DOI: 10.1007/s40037-020-00585-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION After patient care transitions occur, communication from the current physician back to the transferring physician may be an important source of clinical feedback for learning from outcomes of previous reasoning processes. Factors associated with this communication are not well understood. This study clarifies how often, and for what reasons, current physicians do or do not communicate back to transferring physicians about transitioned patients. METHODS In 2018, 38 physicians at two academic teaching hospitals were interviewed about communication decisions regarding 618 transitioned patients. Researchers recorded quantitative and qualitative data in field notes, then coded communication rationales using directed content analysis. Descriptive statistics and mixed effects logistic regression analyses identified communication patterns and examined associations with communication for three conditions: When current physicians 1) changed transferring physicians' clinical decisions, 2) perceived transferring physicians' clinical uncertainty, and 3) perceived transferring physicians' request for communication. RESULTS Communication occurred regarding 17% of transitioned patients. Transferring physicians initiated communication in 55% of these cases. Communication did not occur when current physicians 1) changed transferring physicians' clinical decisions (119 patients), 2) perceived transferring physicians' uncertainty (97 patients), and 3) perceived transferring physicians' request for communication (12 patients). Rationales for no communication included case contextual, structural, interpersonal, and cultural factors. Perceived uncertainty and request for communication were positively associated with communication (p < 0.001) while a changed clinical decision was not. DISCUSSION Current physicians communicate infrequently with transferring physicians after assuming patient care responsibilities. Structural and interpersonal barriers to communication may be amenable to change. Clarity about transferring physicians' uncertainty and desire for communication back may improve clinical feedback communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith L Bowen
- Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Elson S Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
| | - Joseph Chiovaro
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Bridget C O'Brien
- Department of Medicine and Center for Faculty Educators, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christy Kim Boscardin
- Department of Medicine and Center for Faculty Educators, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David M Irby
- Department of Medicine and Center for Faculty Educators, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Olle Ten Cate
- Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Center for Faculty Educators, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bowen JL, Boscardin CK, Chiovaro J, Ten Cate O, Regehr G, Irby DM, O'Brien BC. A view from the sender side of feedback: anticipated receptivity to clinical feedback when changing prior physicians' clinical decisions-a mixed methods study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2020; 25:263-282. [PMID: 31552531 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-019-09916-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
When physicians transition patients, the physician taking over may change the diagnosis. Such a change could serve as an important source of clinical feedback to the prior physician. However, this feedback may not transpire if the current physician doubts the prior physician's receptivity to the information. This study explored facilitators of and barriers to feedback communication in the context of patient care transitions using an exploratory sequential, qualitative to quantitative, mixed methods design. Twenty-two internal medicine residents and hospitalist physicians from two teaching hospitals were interviewed and data were analyzed thematically. A prominent theme was participants' reluctance to communicate diagnostic changes. Participants perceived case complexity and physical proximity to facilitate, and hierarchy, unfamiliarity with the prior physician, and lack of relationship to inhibit communication. In the subsequent quantitative portion of the study, forty-one hospitalists completed surveys resulting in 923 total survey responses. Multivariable analyses and a mixed-effects model were applied to survey data with anticipated receptivity as the outcome variable. In the mixed-effects model, four factors had significant positive associations with receivers' perceived receptivity: (1) feedback senders' time spent on teaching services (β = 0.52, p = 0.02), (2) receivers' trustworthiness and clinical credibility (β = 0.49, p < 0.001), (3) preference of both for shared work rooms (β = 0.15, p = 0.006), and (4) receivers being peers (β = 0.24, p < 0.001) or junior colleagues (β = 0.39, p < 0.001). This study suggests that anticipated receptivity to feedback about changed clinical decisions affects clinical communication loops. Without trusting relationships and opportunities for low risk, casual conversations, hospitalists may avoid such conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith L Bowen
- Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Spokane Academic Center, Elson S Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, 412 E. Spokane Falls Blvd, Spokane, WA, 99202, USA.
- Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Christy Kim Boscardin
- Department of Medicine and Center for Faculty Educators, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joseph Chiovaro
- Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Olle Ten Cate
- Department of Medicine and Center for Faculty Educators, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Glenn Regehr
- Department of Surgery and Centre for Health Education Scholarship, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David M Irby
- Department of Medicine and Center for Faculty Educators, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bridget C O'Brien
- Department of Medicine and Center for Faculty Educators, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|