Assessing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy with patient reported outcome measures: a systematic review of measurement properties and considerations for future use

Study on the Efficacy and Safety of the Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction in the Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Meta-Analysis of 32 Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) still lacks efficient therapeutic drugs. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction (HGWD) alone or combined with positive drugs on CIPN prevention and treatment.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Data, China Science and Technology Journal (VIP) and Chinese Biomedical (CBM) databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HGWD for CIPN prevention and treatment. The search time ranged from database establishment to October 17, 2023. The Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used for quality assessment, Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 12.0 were used for meta-analysis, and GRADEprofiler was used for evidence level assessment.

Results

A total of 32 RCTs involving 1987 patients were included. The meta-analysis results revealed the following: 1. In terms of the total CIPN incidence, that in the HGWD group was lower than that in the blank control group. The incidence in both the HGWD and HGWD+positive drug groups was lower than that in the monotherapy-positive drug group. 2. In terms of the incidence of severe CIPN, that in the HGWD group was lower than that in the blank control and positive drug groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the HGWD+positive drug and positive drug groups. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the results of severe incidence in the HGWD group was lower than that in the positive drug group were unstable 3. HGWD did not increase the number of chemotherapy-related adverse events.

Conclusion

HGWD can safely and effectively prevent CIPN, reduce symptoms, improve quality of life and reduce the impact of chemotherapy drugs on sensory nerve conduction. However, more high-quality RCTs are needed to compare the efficacy of HGWD with that of positive control drugs in preventing severe CIPN.

Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Evaluating Nerve Damage Following Chemotherapy

Importance

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a substantial adverse effect of anticancer treatments. As such, the assessment of CIPN remains critically important in both research and clinic settings.

Objective

To compare the validity of various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with neurophysiological and sensory functional measures as the optimal method of CIPN assessment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study evaluated participants treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy across 2 cohorts using a dual-study design. Participants commencing treatment were assessed prospectively at beginning of neurotoxic treatment, midtreatment, and at the end of treatment. Participants who completed treatment up to 5 years prior were assessed cross-sectionally and completed a single assessment time point. Participants were recruited from oncology centers in Australia from August 2015 to November 2022. Data analysis occurred from February to November 2023.

Exposures

Neurotoxic cancer treatment including taxanes, platinums, vinca-alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors, and thalidomide.

Main Outcomes and Measures

CIPN was assessed via PROMs (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC-CIPN20], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecological Cancer Group Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (FACT/GOG-Ntx), and the patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [PRO-CTCAE]), neurological and neurophysiological assessment (Total Neuropathy Score and sural and tibial compound nerve amplitudes), and sensory measures (Grating orientation, Von Frey monofilament, and 2-point discrimination tasks). Core measurement properties of CIPN outcome measures were evaluated. Convergent and known-groups validity was assessed cross-sectionally following treatment completion, and responsiveness was evaluated prospectively during treatment. Neurological, neurophysiological, and sensory outcome measure scores were compared between those who reported high and low levels of CIPN symptoms using linear regressions.

Results

A total of 1033 participants (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-59] years; 676 female [65.4%]) were recruited to this study, incorporating 1623 assessments. PROMs demonstrated best ability to accurately assess CIPN (convergent validity), especially the PRO-CTCAE composite score (r = 0.85; P < .001) and EORTC-CIPN20 (r = 0.79; P < .001). PROMS also demonstrated the best ability to discriminate between CIPN severity (known-groups validity) and to detect changes at onset of CIPN development (responsiveness), especially for EORTC-CIPN20 (d = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83), FACT/GOG-Ntx (d = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and the PRO-CTCAE (d = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.02). Other measures did not achieve threshold for convergent validity (α < 0.7). Neurophysiological and sensory measures did not demonstrate acceptable responsiveness. In regression models, neurological, neurophysiological, and sensory outcome measures were significantly impaired in participants who reported high levels of CIPN symptoms compared with those who reported low levels of CIPN symptoms.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of 1033 cancer patients, PROMs were the only measures to satisfy all 3 core measurement property criteria (convergent validity, known-groups validity, and responsiveness). These findings suggest that adoption of PROMs in clinical practice can equip clinicians with valuable information in assessing CIPN morbidity.

A qualitative evaluation of the oncologists', neurologists', and pain specialists' views on the management and care of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in The Netherlands

PURPOSE

In treating cancer, different chemotherapy regimens cause chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Despite recent international guidelines, a gold standard for diagnosis, treatment, and care is lacking. To identify the current clinical practice and the physicians' point of view and ideas for improvement, we evaluated CIPN care by interviewing different specialists involved.

METHODS

We performed semi-structured, audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded interviews with a purposive sample of oncologists, pain specialists, and neurologists involved in CIPN patients' care. Data is analyzed by a constant comparative method for content analysis, using ATLAS.ti software. Codes, categories, and themes are extracted, generating common denominators and conclusions.

RESULTS

With oncologists, pain specialists, and neurologists, nine, nine, and eight interviews were taken respectively (including three, two, and two interviews after thematic saturation occurred). While useful preventive measures and predictors are lacking, patient education (e.g., on symptoms and timely reporting) is deemed pivotal, as is low-threshold screening (e.g., anamnesis and questionnaires). Diagnosis focusses on a temporal relationship to chemotherapy, with adjuvant testing (e.g., EMG) used in severe or atypical cases. Symptomatic antineuropathic and topical medication are often prescribed, but personalized and multidimensional care based on individual symptoms and preferences is highly valued. The limited efficacy of existing treatments, and the lack of standardized protocols, interdisciplinary coordination, and awareness among healthcare providers pose significant challenges.

CONCLUSION

Besides the obvious need for better therapeutic options, and multidisciplinary exploration of patients' perspectives, a structured and collaborative approach towards diagnosis, treatment, referral, and follow-up, nurtured by improving knowledge and use of existing CIPN guidelines, could enhance care.

Characterising vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in adults: symptom development and long-term persistent outcomes

BACKGROUND

Decades following the introduction of vincristine as treatment for haematological malignancies, vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) remains a pervasive, untreatable side-effect. However there remains a gap in understanding the characteristics of VIPN in adults. This study presents a comprehensive phenotyping of VIPN.

METHODS

Adult patients (n = 57; age = 59.8 ± 14.6) were assessed cross-sectionally following completion of vincristine (months post treatment = 16.3 ± 15.6, cumulative dose = 7.6 ± 4.4), with a subset of 20 patients assessed prospectively during treatment. Patient reported measures (EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20, R-ODS) were used to profile symptoms and disability. Neurological assessment was undertaken using the Total Neuropathy Score and nerve conduction studies. Sensory threshold and fine motor tasks were also undertaken. Comparisons of data between timepoints were calculated using paired-sample t tests or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Comparisons between outcome measures were calculated with independent sample t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for non-parametric data.

RESULTS

The majority of patients developed VIPN by mid-treatment (77.8%, 7.0 ± 3.3 weeks post baseline) with the prevalence remaining stable by end-of-treatment (75%, 8.1 ± 1.7 weeks post mid-treatment). By 3 months post-completion, 50% of patients still reported VIPN although there were significant improvements on neurological grading and functional assessment (P < 0.05). VIPN presented with sensorimotor involvement in upper and lower limbs and was associated with decreased sensory and motor nerve amplitudes, reduced fine-motor function and increased disability.

CONCLUSION

VIPN in adults presents as a sensorimotor, upper- and lower-limb neuropathy that significantly impacts disability and function. Neuropathy recovery occurs in a proportion of patients; however, VIPN symptoms may persist and continue to affect long-term quality of life.

Summary of evidence on comprehensive healthcare for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to provide an evidence-based summary of the most effective strategies for comprehensive healthcare of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in cancer patients.

METHOD

Following the "6S" model, relevant evidence on CIPN management was collected from reputable evidence-based resource websites and databases nationally and internationally. The included articles were evaluated for methodological quality, and evidence was extracted using the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Center's literature evaluation standard (2016 edition).

RESULTS

A total of 60 articles were included in this study, comprising 2 guidelines, 5 expert consensus statements, and 53 systematic reviews. The findings of these articles were summarized across 7 dimensions, including risk factor screening, assessment, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, management, and health education, resulting in the identification of 42 relevant pieces of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of evidence-based recommendations for managing CIPN in cancer patients, offering guidance for healthcare professionals engaged in clinical practice. However, when implementing these recommendations, it is crucial to consider the individual patient's clinical circumstances, preferences, and expert judgment, ensuring feasibility and applicability in real-world clinical settings.

Diphenyl Diselenide Through Reduction of Inflammation, Oxidative Injury and Caspase-3 Activation Abates Doxorubicin-Induced Neurotoxicity in Rats

Neurotoxicity associated with chemotherapy is a debilitating side effect of cancer management in humans which reportedly involves inflammatory and oxidative stress responses. Diphenyl diselenide (DPDS) is an organoselenium compound which exhibits its anti-tumoral, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-mutagenic effects. Nevertheless, its possible effect on chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity is not known. Using rat model, we probed the behavioral and biochemical effects accompanying administration of antineoplastic agent doxorubicin (7.5 mg/kg) and DPDS (5 and 10 mg/kg). Anxiogenic-like behavior, motor and locomotor insufficiencies associated with doxorubicin were considerably abated by both DPDS doses with concomitant enhancement in exploratory behavior as demonstrated by reduced heat maps intensity and enhanced track plot densities. Moreover, with exception of cerebral glutathione (GSH) level, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities, biochemical data demonstrated reversal of doxorubicin-mediated decline in cerebral and cerebellar antioxidant status indices and the increase in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity by both doses of DPDS. Also, cerebellar and cerebral lipid peroxidation, hydrogen peroxide as well as reactive oxygen and nitrogen species levels were considerably diminished in rats administered doxorubicin and DPDS. In addition, DPDS administration abated myeloperoxidase activity, tumour necrosis factor alpha and nitric oxide levels along with caspase-3 activity in doxorubicin-administered rats. Chemoprotection of doxorubicin-associated neurotoxicity by DPDS was further validated by histomorphometry and histochemical staining. Taken together, DPDS through offsetting of oxido-inflammatory stress and caspase-3 activation elicited neuroprotection in doxorubicin-treated rats.

Upper-limb dysfunction in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity

INTRODUCTION

Upper-limb symptoms are often reported in the context of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN), but objective quantification of functional deficits is often lacking. We examined and compared a range of neurophysiological and functional assessments of the upper-limb in the assessment of CIPN severity.

METHODS

Cross-sectional assessment of neurotoxic chemotherapy-treated patients was undertaken using patient-reported and clinically-graded CIPN measures. Upper-limb functional assessments comprised of assessing fine motor skills, sensory perception, and neurophysiological measures of the median nerve. Group comparisons between participants who reported absence or presence of upper-limb functional deficits were investigated.

RESULTS

60 participants who were 11.5 (IQR = 4.0-26.0) months post-neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment reported CIPN. 65% (n = 39) reported upper-limb CIPN symptoms. Reduction in fine motor skills, sensory perception and median nerve SNAP amplitudes were associated with higher CIPN severity. Participants who self-reported presence of upper-limb functional deficits had worse CIPN severity across all measures, compared to participants who reported no upper-limb functional deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants who reported upper-limb symptoms and functional deficits had worse CIPN severity and quality-of-life. There is a high burden of upper-limb dysfunction long after neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment cessation. Focus on research into supportive care and rehabilitation options to improve upper-limb function is warranted to improve patient quality-of-life.

Oxaliplatin-related dysphagia: Mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate participant-reported atypical dysphagia symptoms and their association with oxaliplatin treatment.

METHODS

This observational study recruited 73 adults with solid tumours outside the head, neck or upper gastrointestinal tract. All had dysphagia, were in hospital or hospice and were treated by Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology or Palliative Care. Participants reported their experiences of swallowing difficulties by semistructured interview. Oral Health Assessment Tool was used to ensure swallow difficulties were not due to mucositis. Responses were transcribed and analysed by content analysis. Atypical difficulties were examined for association with oxaliplatin treatment by Fischer's Exact.

RESULTS

Oxaliplatin treatment was associated with three unusual dysphagia symptoms: problems with cold or hot bolus (p=0.01), pins and needles (p=0.001) and throat spasm (p=0.035). Carbonation was problematic for one participant. Chemotherapy commencement coincided with swallow problem onset for 67%. Dysphagia symptoms were unrelated to mucositis (p=0.165).

CONCLUSIONS

Swallowing difficulties in oxaliplatin-treated patients are atypical and attributable to chemotherapy commencement. Previous research suggests that dysphagia is triggered by cold exposure, but hot and carbonated boluses also caused problems here. Dysphagia symptoms and triggers should be studied more fully to help patients safely enjoy their meals and prevent food avoidance, which could exacerbate malnutrition.

Preclinical research in paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain: a systematic review

Introduction

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common consequence of cancer treatment and pain is a frequent complaint of the patients. Paclitaxel, a cytostatic drug, generates a well-described peripheral nerve injury and neuroinflammation, which may be experimentally mimicked in animal models. We conducted a systematic review analyzing the experimental design, reporting and mechanisms underlying paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in the included studies to establish the perspectives of translation of the current literature in models of CIPN.

Methods

We elected studies published in Pubmed and Scopus between 1 January 2018 and 3 December 2022.

Results

According to a defined mesh of keywords searched, and after applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, 70 original studies were included and analyzed in detail. Most studies used male Sprague-Dawley rats to induce paclitaxel-induced neuropathy, used low doses of paclitaxel, and the analyzed studies mainly focused at 14-28 days of CIPN. Mechanical nociceptive tests were preferred in the behavioral evaluation. The mechanisms under study were mainly neuroinflammation of peripheral nerves. The overall methodological quality was considered moderate, and the risk of bias was unclear.

Discussion

Despite the ample preclinical research in paclitaxel-induced neuropathy, this systematic review alerts to some flaws in the experimental design along with limitations in reporting, e.g., lack of representation of both sexes in experimental work and the lack of reporting of the ARRIVE guidelines. This may limit the reproducibility of preclinical studies in CIPN. In addition, the clinical features of CIPN should be considered when designing animal experiments, such as sex and age of the CIPN patients. In this way the experimental studies aiming to establish the mechanisms of CIPN may allow the development of new drugs to treat CIPN and translation in the research of CIPN could be improved.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Nurse-Led Auricular Acupressure on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major symptom of distress among chemotherapy-treated cancer survivors. Although various interventions have been attempted, there is no criterion-standard treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of auricular acupressure (AA) in improving peripheral neuropathy symptoms in breast cancer patients undergoing taxane-based treatment.

METHODS

A total of 51 eligible participants were enrolled and randomly allocated (1:1) to AA or sham control groups. The intervention was performed weekly for 3 weeks using different ear points, depending on the group. The Total Neuropathy Score was used to measure CIPN objectively. The Numerical Rating Scale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy-20 were used to measure the subjective symptoms of CIPN. Outcomes were compared between groups by time interaction using generalized estimating equations based on the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Only 1 participant dropped out because of nausea and mild fever. The results of generalized estimating equations showed significant improvement in Numerical Rating Scale scores on the hands and feet and total Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy-20 in the experimental group compared with the sham control group (all Ps < .05). Although the experimental group showed a greater reduction in Total Neuropathy Score scores than the sham control group, no significant differences were found.

CONCLUSION

Auricular acupressure is an effective and safe nurse-led intervention for managing CIPN symptoms in breast cancer patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings help nurses to integrate AA easily and usefully into nursing care, contributing to managing symptoms of CIPN in cancer patients and survivors.

Exploring Outcome Priorities and Real-Life Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: A Survey of the Italian Association for the Study of Pain members

Introduction

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) affects nearly 70% of cancer patients after chemotherapy, causing sensory, motor, autonomic dysfunction, and neuropathic pain. The Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) framework is proposed as a better way to assess preventive or therapeutic interventions for CIPN.

Methods

A survey was conducted among Italian healthcare professionals and researchers affiliated to the Italian Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (AISD) to identify the most important outcomes in clinical management and research.

Results

Among the 73 respondents, 61 qualified for the survey, with an overall response rate of 1.2%. The vast majority were physicians (77%), most of whom were anesthesiologists (47.5%). The results showed that pain, survival, sensory impairment, motor impairment, and quality of life were consistently ranked as the most important outcomes, but there was significant disagreement in the outcomes relative ranking, making it difficult to develop a DOOR algorithm. The study also revealed that clinicians commonly use structured interviews to evaluate patients with CIPN, and the most prescribed drugs or supplements were palmitoylethanolamide, pregabalin, gabapentin and alpha lipoic acid as preventive agents and pregabalin, palmitoylethanolamide, duloxetine, gabapentin, and amitriptyline as therapeutic agents. However, many of these drugs have not been clinically proven to be effective for CIPN.

Discussion

This study suggests that the implementation of a DOOR framework for CIPN using healthcare professionals is more difficult than expected, given the significant disagreement in our respondents' ranking of outcomes. Our work provides interesting topics for future research in CIPN, but its limitations include a small sample size, a low response rate, and a possible selection bias.

Effect of cilostazol on preventing paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy is a significant clinical problem can markedly deteriorate patient's quality of life (QoL). Preclinical evidence exists about the preventive capacity of cilostazol against peripheral neuropathy. However, this hypothesis has not yet been clinically investigated. This proof-of-concept study evaluated the effect of cilostazol on the incidence of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.

DESIGN

This is a parallel randomized placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

The Oncology Center at Mansoura University, Egypt.

PATIENTS

Patients with breast cancer scheduled to receive paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 biweekly.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to either cilostazol group who received cilostazol tablets 100 mg BID, or to control group who received placebo instead.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary endpoint was the incidence of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy evaluated through common terminology criteria for adverse event (NCI-CTCAE) version 4. Secondary endpoints included assessment of the patient's QoL by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTx) subscale. Exploratory outcome measures included changes in serum levels of biomarkers namely nerve growth factor (NGF), and neurofilament light chain (NfL).

MAIN RESULTS

The incidence of grade 2 and 3 peripheral neuropathies were significantly lower in the cilostazol group (40%) compared to the control group (86.7%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of clinically significant worsening in neuropathy-related QoL was higher in control group compared to the cilostazol group (p = 0.001). A higher percent increase from baseline in serum NGF was observed in the cilostazol group (p = 0.043). The circulating levels of NfL deemed comparable between the two arms at the end of the study (p = 0.593).

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive use of cilostazol is as a novel option that might reduce the incidence of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy and improve the patients' QoL. Future larger clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Metrics in Cancer Rehabilitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current panorama of measurement tools for use in cancer rehabilitation is reviewed. For rehabilitation purposes, evaluating function is of the highest priority.

RECENT FINDINGS

From a patient-reported outcome (PRO) standpoint, SF-36 and EORTC-QLQ-C30 are in most common use in cancer rehabilitation research; these are quality of life measures that contain functional subdomains. Newer tools which are based on item response theory and have options for both computer assisted or short form (SF) administration, including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Activity Measure for Post-acute Care (AMPAC) instruments, show increasing use, especially PROMIS Physical Function SF, and, recently, PROMIS Cancer Function Brief 3D, which has been validated in the cancer population, with domains of physical function, fatigue, and social participation, to track clinical rehabilitation outcomes. Evaluating objective measures of function in cancer patients is also crucial. Utilization of clinically feasible tools for cancer rehabilitation, to employ for both screening purposes and for monitoring of rehabilitation treatment efficacy, is an evolving area, much needed to promote further research and improved, consistent clinical care for cancer patients and survivors.

Efficacy of metformin in prevention of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial

Background: Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a serious clinical problem with no approved drug for prevention. This study aimed to examine the neuroprotective effect of metformin against paclitaxel-induced PN in breast cancer patients. Methods: Patients with confirmed breast cancer diagnosis who were planned to receive paclitaxel were randomized to receive either metformin or placebo. Both groups received the standard chemotherapy protocol for breast cancer. Patients started metformin/placebo 1 week before paclitaxel initiation and continued study interventions thereafter for nine consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was the incidence of development of grade two or more paclitaxel-induced sensory PN. The PN was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE). Patients' quality of life (QoL) was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACTGOG-Ntx) subscale. Pain severity was measured by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF). Serum levels of nerve growth factor (NGF) and neurotensin (NT) were measured at baseline and at the end paclitaxel treatment. Results: A total of 73 patients (36 in the metformin arm and 37 in the control arm) were evaluated. The cumulative incidence of development of grade two or more PN was significantly lower in the metformin arm (14 (38.9%) than the control arm (28 (75.7%); p = 0.001). At the end of paclitaxel treatment, patients' QoL was significantly better in the metformin arm [median (IQR) FACTGOG-Ntx subscale of (24.0 (20.5-26.5)] compared to the control arm (21.0 (18.0-24.0); p = 0.003). The metformin arm showed lower "average" and "worst" pain scores than those detected in the control arm. At the end of the paclitaxel treatment, there was a significant difference in the median serum NGF levels between the two arms, favoring metformin (p < 0.05), while NT serum levels were deemed comparable between the two study arms (p = 0.09). Conclusion: The use of metformin in breast cancer patients offered a marked protection against paclitaxel-induced PN, which translated to better patient QoL. Clinical Trial Registration: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05351021, identifier NCT05351021.

Chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy in cancer care-the patient perspective

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-related polyneuropathy (CIPN) is a very common, often dose-limiting side effect that affects the patients' quality of life. Treatment usually consists of a combination of medicinal, medical, and individualized treatment approaches, although the effectiveness of these therapies is insufficient for many patients. The aim of this article is to review and evaluate the impact of CIPN on patients' daily lives and possible effective treatment approaches.

METHODS

A standardized questionnaire was developed based on ten anonymous telephone interviews with CIPN patients. The content of the questionnaire was divided into 5 categories: demographics, clinical presentation, everyday symptoms, treatment of CIPN symptoms, and medical care. Mostly closed questions were used but multiple choice and individual additions by free text answers were possible.

RESULTS

CIPN limits patients' quality of life over a long period of time. In addition to diurnal and situational fluctuations, the emotional burden negatively affects patients' daily lives in many ways. From the patients' point of view, the individually implemented therapy measures were most effective in treating their complaints. But even the combination of different therapy methods insufficiently alleviates the symptoms of the patients.

CONCLUSION

It is important and necessary to comprehensively inform patients about CIPN as a possible side effect, to point out prevention strategies, and to critically examine and evaluate different therapy approaches. In this way, misunderstandings of the doctor-patient relationship can be avoided. In addition, patient satisfaction and quality of life can be increased in the long term.

Association of electrochemical skin conductance with neuropathy in chemotherapy-treated patients

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an adverse event of cancer treatment that can affect sensory, motor, or autonomic nerves. Assessment of autonomic neuropathy is challenging, with limited available tools. Accordingly, it is not routinely assessed in chemotherapy-treated patients. In this study, we aimed to examine whether electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) via Sudoscan, a potential measure of autonomic function, associates with subjective and objective measures of CIPN severity and autonomic neuropathy.

METHODS

A cross-sectional assessment of patients who completed neurotoxic chemotherapy 3-24 months prior was undertaken using CIPN patient-reported outcomes (EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20), clinically graded scale (NCI-CTCAE), neurological examination score (TNSc), autonomic outcome measure (SAS), and Sudoscan. Differences in CIPN severity between participants with or without ESC dysfunction were investigated. Linear regression analyses were used to identify whether ESC values could predict CIPN severity.

RESULTS

A total of 130 participants were assessed, with 93 participants classified with CIPN according to the clinically graded scale (NCI-CTCAE/grade ≥ 1), while 49% demonstrated hands or feet ESC dysfunction (n = 46). Participants with ESC dysfunction did not significantly differ from those with no dysfunction on multiple CIPN severity measures (clinical-grade, patient-report, neurological examination), and no differences on the autonomic outcome measure (SAS) (all p > 0.0063). Linear regression analyses showed that CIPN could not be predicted by ESC values.

CONCLUSIONS

The inability of ESC values via Sudoscan to predict clinically-graded and patient-reported CIPN or autonomic dysfunction questions its clinical utility for chemotherapy-treated patients. The understanding of autonomic neuropathy with chemotherapy treatment remains limited and must be addressed to improve quality of life in cancer survivors.