Identification, Diagnosis and Treatment of Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis: A Registry of Prolonged Heparin Use and Thrombocytopenia among Hospitalized Patients with and without Cardiovascular Disease

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in a Patient with Essential Thrombocythemia: A Case Based Update

Vascular thrombosis is a common clinical feature of both essential thrombocythemia (ET) and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The development of HIT in a patient with ET is rare and underrecognized. We report the case of a 77-year-old woman with preexisting ET, who was admitted with acute coronary syndrome, and IV heparin was started. She was exposed to unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5 days prior to this admission. Decrease in platelet count was noted, and HIT panel was sent. Heparin was discontinued. Patient developed atrial fibrillation, and Dabigatran was started. On day three, patient also developed multiple tiny cerebral infarctions and acute right popliteal DVT. On day ten of admission, HIT panel was positive, and Dabigatran was changed to Lepirudin. Two days later, Lepirudin was also discontinued because patient developed pseudoaneurysm on the right common femoral artery at the site of cardiac catheterization access. A progressive increase in the platelet count was noted after discontinuing heparin. Physicians should be aware of the coexistence of HIT and ET, accompanied challenges of the prompt diagnosis, and initiation of appropriate treatment.

Evaluation of a pretest scoring system (4Ts) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a university hospital setting

The initial diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is made on clinical grounds because the assays with the highest sensitivity (eg, heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) and specificity (eg, serotonin release assay) may not be readily available. The clinical utility of the pretest scoring system, the 4Ts, was developed and validated by Lo et al in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis in 2006. The pretest scoring system looks at the degree and timing of thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, and the possibility of other etiologies. Based on the 4T score, patients can be categorized as having a high, intermediate, or low probability of having HIT. We conducted a retrospective study of 100 consecutive patients who were tested for HIT during their hospitalization at Hahnemann University Hospital (Philadelphia, PA) in 2009. Of the 100 patients analyzed, 72, 23, and 5 patients had 4T pretest probability scores of low, intermediate, and high, respectively. A positive HIT ELISA (optical density > 1.0 unit) was detected in 0 of 72 patients (0%) in the low probability group, in 5 of 23 patients (22%) in the intermediate probability group, and in 2 of 5 patients (40%) in the high probability group. The average turnaround time for the HIT ELISA was 4 to 5 days. Fourteen (19%) of the 72 patients with a low pretest probability of HIT were treated with a direct thrombin inhibitor. Ten (71%) of the 14 patients in the low probability group treated with a direct thrombin inhibitor had a major complication of bleeding requiring blood transfusion support. In this retrospective study, a low 4T score showed 100% correlation with a negative HIT antibody assay. We recommend incorporating the 4T scoring system into institutional core measures when assessing a patient with suspected HIT, selecting only patients with intermediate to high probability for therapeutic intervention, which may translate into reduced morbidity and lower health care costs.

On the use of prothrombin complex concentrate in patients with coagulopathy requiring tooth extraction

In patients on high-level anticoagulant therapy (prothrombin time-international normalized ratio [PT-INR] ≥ 4.5), surgical procedures can be carried out with bridging therapy using heparin. However, surgical treatment options are severely limited in patients on high-level anticoagulant therapy and who have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), as heparin use is contraindicated. We performed tooth extraction using prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in 2 HIT patients on high-level anticoagulation therapy (PT-INR ≥ 4.5). Five hundred units of PCC were administered intravenously, and after 15 minutes, it was confirmed that PT-INR was less than 2.0. Tooth extraction was then performed and sufficient local hemostasis was achieved. At 3 hours after tooth extraction, PT-INR was 2.0 or higher and later increased to 4.0 or higher, but postoperative bleeding was mostly absent. When performing tooth extraction in HIT patients on high-level anticoagulant therapy, favorable hemostatic management was achieved through sufficient local hemostasis and transient warfarin reversal using PCC.

Update in hematology: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and bivalirudin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is important because it is common, and it significantly increases mortality after cardiac surgery. Although thrombocytopenia after cardiac surgery is common, it predicts serious adverse outcome when it is severe. Despite the high prevalence of heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies in cardiac surgical patients, they typically do not indicate a higher perioperative risk. Recent evidence suggests, however, that when these antibodies are in the immunoglobulin M class, there is an increased risk of nonthrombotic adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. According to the guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians, patients with HIT require parenteral anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor such as lepirudin, argatroban, or bivalirudin. The transition to oral anticoagulation must be undertaken cautiously and only after the platelet count has recovered. Patients with a remote history of HIT can have cardiac surgery safely with unfractionated heparin. Patients with clinically active HIT who require cardiac surgery before the resolution of the HIT preferably should be anticoagulated with bivalirudin, dosed according to body weight and the goal-activated coagulation time. Given that bivalirudin is an established alternative to heparin as a thrombin inhibitor for cardiac surgery, it is likely that future trials will investigate which anticoagulant confers better outcomes after cardiac surgery, as is the case in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Six-month follow-up of patients with in-hospital thrombocytopenia during heparin-based anticoagulation (from the Complications After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin [CATCH] registry)

Thrombocytopenia is a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in critically ill patients. The Complications After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) registry was designed to explore the incidence, management, and clinical consequences of in-hospital thrombocytopenia occurring during heparin-based anticoagulation in diverse clinical settings. We conducted a prospective observational study of 37 United States hospitals participating in the CATCH registry to assess the relation of in-hospital thrombocytopenia to long-term outcomes. A total of 2,104 patients at increased risk of developing in-hospital thrombocytopenia or thrombosis were identified, and the 6-month mortality and rehospitalization rates were determined. Thrombocytopenia was not a significant predictor of 6-month mortality. In an adjusted model for in-hospital death in this cohort, thrombocytopenia had an odds ratio of 3.59 (95% confidence interval 2.24 to 5.77). The postdischarge mortality rate at 6 months was 9.7%. No significant difference was observed in the long-term mortality between patients who developed thrombocytopenia and those who did not. Thrombocytopenia was a weak, but statistically significant, predictor of a composite of mortality and rehospitalization at 6 months (hazards ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.98, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the 6-month mortality rate among heparin-treated patients with thrombocytopenia is high, although the risk independently related to thrombocytopenia appears to be restricted to the acute hospital phase.

Contribution of bleeding and thromboembolic events to in-hospital mortality among patients with thrombocytopenia treated with heparin

In a population of patients experiencing thrombocytopenia while treated with heparin, bleeding and thromboses are well-appreciated complications, but their relative contributions to mortality have been less well described. In this population, the aims of this study were (1) to identify the independent predictors of bleeding and (2) to compare the incidence and the strength of association of bleeding and of new thromboses to in-hospital mortality. The independent predictors of bleeding and in-hospital mortality were identified using multivariate logistic regression models on the 1,478 patients who developed thrombocytopenia after their enrollment in the Complications After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) study. The independent predictors of bleeding were chronic hematologic disorders, intra-aortic balloon pump, congestive heart failure, and platelet count nadir <120 x 10(9)/L. Although bleeding (n = 141 [10%]) and thromboembolic complications (n = 135 [9%]) were equally prevalent, the former was less strongly associated than the latter with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 3.03, and odds ratio 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.67 to 4.61, respectively). In conclusion, medical management should be directed mainly at the prevention of thromboembolic complications, while additionally considering the risk for bleeding.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A contemporary clinical approach to diagnosis and management

Thrombocytopenia following heparin administration can be associated with an immune reaction, now referred to as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is essentially a prothrombotic disorder mediated by an IgG antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibody, which induces platelet, endothelial cell, monocyte, and other cellular activation, leading to thrombin generation and thrombotic complications. Indeed, HIT can also be regarded as a serious adverse drug effect. Importantly, HIT can be a life-threatening and limb-threatening condition frequently associated with characteristically severe and extensive thromboembolism (both venous and arterial) rather than with bleeding. This article provides an overview of HIT, with an emphasis on the clinical diagnosis and management.

Evaluation and management of thrombocytopenia and suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients: The Complications After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) registry

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are potentially devastating paradoxical side effects of heparin therapy. We explored the evaluation, management, and clinical consequences of thrombocytopenia occurring during heparin therapy in diverse clinical settings.

METHODS

CATCH was a prospective observational study that enrolled 3,536 patients in 48 US hospitals. Data were collected on 3 strata: patients receiving any form of heparin for > or =96 hours (n = 2,420); cardiac care unit (CCU) patients treated with heparin who developed thrombocytopenia (n = 1,090); patients who had an HIT assay performed (n = 449).

RESULTS

Thrombocytopenia occurred in 36.4% of patients in the prolonged heparin stratum and was associated with an increased risk of death or thromboembolic complication (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9). Among a subset of patients whose clinical presentation suggested they were at high risk for HIT, suspicion for HIT was uncommon (prolonged heparin stratum 19.8%, CCU stratum 37.6%) and often did not arise until > or =1 day after patients developed thrombocytopenia. Often patients were not evaluated for HIT until after they had had a thromboembolic complication (prolonged heparin stratum 43.8%, CCU stratum 61%). Even after HIT was suspected, patients often continued to receive heparin. Direct thrombin inhibitor use was infrequent (prolonged heparin stratum 29.4%, CCU stratum 35.6%). Among the few patients who underwent evaluation, HIT was confirmed in 46.7% of the prolonged heparin stratum and 31.4% of the CCU stratum.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombocytopenia is common among patients receiving heparin, and it is associated with substantial risk for catastrophic complications. Despite the high risk for HIT in this population, recognition, evaluation, and appropriate treatment are infrequent and delayed.

Heparin/PF4 antibodies formation after heparin treatment: temporal aspects and long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is characterized by the presence of heparin-induced antibodies against heparin/platelet factor-4 (PF4) complex and paradoxical thrombosis. Little is known on the persistence of antiheparin antibodies in blood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time course of heparin/PF4 antibodies in patients exposed to heparin.

METHODS

We initially enrolled 500 patients treated with unfractionated heparin as part of perioperative management of coronary artery bypass graft; those who developed serologically confirmed heparin/PF4 antibodies were selected for further follow-up. Over 3 years, we repeatedly assessed serum concentration of antibodies (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and occurrence of thrombotic events.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one patients (26.2%) developed anti-PF4/heparin antibodies, which persisted for a median time of 90 days (Quartile 1-Quartile 3, 31-186). At 30 days, patients with antibodies had higher incidence of thrombotic events (28.2% vs 14.9%, P < .01) and death/myocardial infarction (14.5% vs 7.8%, P < .001). Of the 131 patients with antiheparin/PF4 antibodies, 78 had already developed antibodies before cardiac surgery; such patients became serologically negative more slowly than patients who developed antibodies after surgery. Over 3 years of follow-up, patients with anti-PF4/heparin antibodies developed 65 thrombotic events, 25 patients developed deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, and 20 patients myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with heparin-induced antibodies are more likely to develop thrombosis after cardiac surgery. Patients in whom antibodies are present before surgery show longer persistence of antibodies and increased incidence of thrombotic events over time. Persistence of antibodies suggests that these patients may be at risk for developing thrombosis; and therefore, further exposure to heparin should be limited.

Thrombocytopenia associated with antithrombotic therapy in patients with cardiovascular diseases: diagnosis and treatment

Agents with antiplatelet and anticoagulant activity have been proved to be effective in reducing the incidence of complications following acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention, and cardiopulmonary bypass. However, these agents, including heparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, and thienopyridines, are associated with increased risk of bleeding and thrombocytopenia and have been administered together with increasing frequency in a variety of cardiovascular settings. Therefore, clinicians must be familiar with the safety and rational use of these potent antithrombotic agents. Clinical features of thrombocytopenia range from bleeding to thrombosis, even death, and therapy is very different depending on the underlying cause. Additionally, patients may sometimes need urgent intervention or surgery. Thus, it is essential to quickly discriminate the etiology and start appropriate therapy. This review highlights the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory manifestation, differential diagnosis, and treatment of antithrombotic drug-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiovascular diseases.

The prevalence of pantoprazole associated thrombocytopenia in a community hospital

OBJECTIVE

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in the treatment of gastritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer disease. Thrombocytopenia is not listed as one of the main side effects of PPI therapy. However, there have been documented cases of thrombocytopenia with the use of PPIs in the literature. Our objective was to determine whether exposure to PPIs leads to an increased incidence of thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study examined the platelet counts of 468 hospitalized patients who were 18 - 80 years of age, were prescribed pantoprazole for a minimum of 3 days and were matched to 468 non-medicated controls. The primary outcome was defined as either a drop in the platelet count by >/= 50% relative to baseline, or a drop to < 150,000/ml. Exclusion criteria were baseline thrombocytopenia and hospitalization for < 3 days.

RESULTS

No difference was found in the occurrence of thrombocytopenia between the two groups (6.2%; 95% CI = 4.1 - 8.7%) in the study group versus (6.6%; 95% CI = 4.5 - 9.2%) in the control group (p = 0.90). Post-hoc analysis revealed a higher incidence of > 20% drop in platelet count in the study group compared with the controls (23%; 95% CI = 19 - 27% versus 11%; 95% CI = 8 - 14%, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate an increased incidence of thrombocytopenia for patients treated with pantoprazole. Our study adds support to the favorable safety profile of PPI therapy in hospitalized patients. Further investigation is needed to evaluate the effects of PPI use in the outpatient setting.

Spontaneous superior sagittal sinus thrombosis secondary to type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presenting as an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage

Cerebral sinus thrombosis is a rare cause of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. The development of cerebral sinus thrombosis as a complication of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is even rarer. In this paper, we present a 59-year-old patient admitted to our service with cerebral sinus thrombosis secondary to type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. We also review the literature in regard to the incidence, pathophysiology and management of this rare clinicopathological entity.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the critical care setting: Diagnosis and management^

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is a common occurrence in critical illness, reported in up to 41% of patients. Systematic evaluation of thrombocytopenia in critical care is essential to accurate identification and management of the cause. Although sepsis and hemodilution are more common etiologies of thrombocytopenia in critical illness, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one potential etiology that warrants consideration.

OBJECTIVE

This review will summarize the pathogenesis and clinical consequences of HIT, describe the diagnostic process, and review currently available treatment options.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE/PubMed search of all relevant primary and review articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS

HIT is a clinicopathologic syndrome characterized by thrombocytopenia (>/=50% from baseline) that typically occurs between days 5 and 14 after initiation of heparin. This temporal profile suggests a possible diagnosis of HIT, which can be supported (or refuted) with a strong positive (or negative) laboratory test for HIT antibodies. When considering the diagnosis of HIT, critical care professionals should monitor platelet counts in patients who are at risk for HIT and carefully evaluate for, a) temporal features of the thrombocytopenia in relation to heparin exposure; b) severity of thrombocytopenia; c) clinical evidence for thrombosis; and d) alternative etiologies of thrombocytopenia. Due to its prothrombotic nature, early recognition of HIT and prompt substitution of heparin with a direct thrombin inhibitor (e.g., argatroban or lepirudin) or the heparinoid danaparoid (where available) reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, some of which may be life-threatening.

Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Comprehensive Review

As the non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) include unstable angina pectoris (UAP) and the non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), acute diagnosis and risk stratification can often prove challenging. This review will cover guidelines and strategies for risk assessment, contemporary approaches to acute patient management as well as recommendations for timing of specialist referral.