The AVAIL ME study: a multinational survey of VTE risk and prophylaxis

A Multi-center Cross-Sectional Assessment of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Thromboprophylaxis

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially avoidable condition that affects hospitalized patients. Risk stratification and preventative strategies have substantial evidence supporting their use, but reasons hinder widespread adoption, compliance, and success, explaining the continuation of VTE. Thromboprophylaxis consists of several measures that are frequently adopted to avoid the complications of VTE. The study evaluated knowledge, attitude, and practice toward using thromboprophylaxis by health professionals. Methods This multi-center cross-sectional study was carried out on health professionals involved in patient care working in various secondary and tertiary hospitals in the study region between October 2023 and February 2024. A previously published questionnaire was sent in the form of an online survey to the study participants. Fifteen, ten, and nine questions evaluated the participants' knowledge, attitude, and practice of thromboprophylaxis, respectively. The study followed the checklist for reporting results of the Internet E-survey (CHERRIES) guidelines. Frequency and percentages were calculated. Bi-variable and multi-variable logistic regression were carried out and presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results Of the 219 participants, 115 (52.5%) and 104 (47.5%) were males and females. More than 50.7% were in the age group of >30 years, and the majority of the participants possessed a bachelor's (104 (47.5%)) degree. One hundred seventy-six (80.4%) of the study participants were working in government hospitals, and the majority (112 (51.1%)) were nurses. One hundred sixty-two (74% (67.63-79.65)), 175 (79.9% (73.98-85.01)) and 211 (96.3% (92.93)) had satisfactory knowledge, a positive attitude, and good practice regarding thromboprophylaxis, respectively. Regarding the facility characteristics, 196 (89.5%), 150 (68.5%), and 164 (74.9%) respondents agreed with the availability of a VTE prevention policy, VTE prevention consultants, and the availability of anticoagulants. Eighty (36.5%) participants responded with a 'not availability' of pneumatic compression devices. Of the 15 knowledge questions, the majority (124 (56.6%)) participants faulted the false statements regarding 'patients of DVT being symptomatic' and 119 (54.3%) on the statement that helping patients 'out of bed activity does not prevent VTE'. On multi-variable analysis, participants who were aware of having a VTE prevention policy and availability of anticoagulants were more knowledgeable with adjusted odds ratios of 5.39 (1.88-15.39) and 2.52 (1.12-5.63) respectively. Every practice domain received >90% approval ratings. Conclusions The study concludes that an overall satisfactory knowledge and positive attitude regarding thromboprophylaxis exists among the participants. The study proposes more training sessions on VTE prevention and orientation of health professionals on the availability of VTE policy guidelines and facility availability of resources for thromboprophylaxis.

Increasing venous thromboembolism risk assessment through a whole hospital-based intervention: a pre-post service evaluation to demonstrate quality improvement

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. VTE risk assessment is a crucial part of the VTE prevention guideline. However, VTE risk assessment was not consistently undertaken for admitted patients. The aim of this study was to identify whether a quality improvement project implemented to change documentation of VTE risk assessment for hospitalized patients impacted patient safety by decreasing the rate of VTE incidences. The study was set in a 600+ bed acute hospital that provides medical and surgical services for adult patients during the period October 2018-September 2020. The hospital adopted the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 9th edition VTE prevention guidelines and followed the Modified Caprini risk assessment tool. Following the FOCUS-Plan-Do-Check-Act (FOCUS PDCA) improvement methodology, the improvement team implemented multicomponent interventions over a 3-month period, including conducting educational sessions, sharing VTE documentation compliance results, giving reminders during rounds, assigning a VTE liaison physician within each clinical specialty, and updating and communicating the hospital adopted VTE guidelines. A total of 17 612 patients were included, respectively, 8971 in pre-intervention and 8641 post-intervention period. Documentation of VTE risk assessment upon admission increased significantly in the post quality improvement intervention period (60% vs. 42%, relative increase of 30%, χ2 = 1.43, P < 0.001). The run chart trend analysis demonstrated significant improvement shift and improvement trend after quality improvement project implementation, and it was sustained for 15 months. There was no impact on patient safety with a slight not statistically significant decrease in the VTE incidences rate post intervention period (0.4% vs. 0.5%, relative decrease of 1%, χ2 = 0.82, P < 0.397). The quality improvement project intervention significantly increased the percentage of patients assessed for VTE risk in a hospital setting.

Physicians' perceptions and preferences for implementing venous thromboembolism (VTE) clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism is a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalised patients. Clinical practice guidelines were developed to prevent venous thromboembolism events. This study adopted the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore the beliefs and perceptions of physicians adoption of clinical practice guidelines for the uptake of venous thromboembolism prevention guidelines.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a stratified purposive sample of internal medicine physicians in an acute hospital. The interview topic guide was developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify the factors perceived to influence the practice. Two researchers coded the interview transcripts using thematic content analysis. Emerging relevant themes were mapped to TDF domains.

RESULTS

A total of sixteen medical physicians were interviewed over a six-month period. Nine theoretical domains derived from thirty-three belief statements were identified as relevant to the target behaviour; knowledge (education about the importance of VTE guidelines); beliefs about capabilities (with practice VTE tool easier to implement); beliefs about consequences (positive consequences in reducing the development of VTE, length of stay, financial burden and support physician decision) and (negative consequence risk of bleeding); reinforcement (recognition and continuous reminders); goals (patient safety goal); environmental context and resources (workload and availability of medications were barriers, VTE coordinator and electronic medical record were enablers); social influences (senior physicians and patient/family influence the VTE practice); behavioural regulation (monitoring and mandatory hospital policy); and nature of the behaviour.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Theoretical Domains Framework, factors thought to influence the implementation of VTE clinical practice guidelines were identified which can be used to design theoretically based interventions by targeting specific psychological constructs and linking them to behaviour change techniques to change the clinical practice of physicians.

Safety and effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis use in hospitalized elderly medical patients at a Saudi tertiary care center

Introduction

Appropriate prescribing of thromboprophylaxis according to guidelines' recommendations can heighten over- or underutilization risk. The study intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of appropriate/inappropriate thromboprophylaxis use among hospitalized elderly medical patients.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, including patients who were ≥60 years old, hospitalized for an acute medical illness that required hospitalization in a medical ward for >48 h, and received thromboprophylaxis. Against the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, the thromboprophylaxis use appropriateness was assessed.

Results

A total of 370 patients met the inclusion criteria, in 71.9% of whom thromboprophylaxis use was appropriate. The mean age of the included patients was 75 years (±9.1), and 72.4% of them were at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and almost all these patients received appropriate thromboprophylaxis. The occurrence of bleeding was significantly higher in the appropriate use group during hospitalization than the inappropriate use group (11.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.009); the majority of these bleeding events were classified as major. There were no differences in VTE events during hospitalization or 90 days all-cause mortality between the two groups.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates high prescribers' compliance with recommendations in high-risk patients. In patients at low risk for VTE, the overutilization of thromboprophylaxis did not increase their bleeding risk. This study suggests that the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in elderly patients, regardless of their VTE risk, may outweigh the risk of bleeding.

A cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study to assess the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in Lebanese and Jordanian hospitals

Background

There is a growing body of evidence showing substantial underuse of appropriate venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients at risk. In the present study, our goal was to assess the current practices in the use rate of VTE prophylaxis among hospitalized patients in Jordan and Lebanon.

Methods

A cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study was conducted on 40 centers across Lebanon and Jordan. We included patients who were admitted to the participating hospitals for the treatment of a serious medical or surgical illness. The patients’ records were screened for the fulfillment of inclusion/exclusion criteria during a single assessment visit. The proportion of medical and surgical patients who were at risk of VTE and the thrombo-prophylactic measures employed by physicians for these patients were assessed according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP 2016) guidelines.

Results

The present study included 704 patients (400 from Jordan and 304 from Lebanon) with a mean age of 54.9 ± 17.5 years. Almost 59% of the patients received prophylaxis treatment in form of pharmacological anticoagulant prophylaxis and/or mechanical prophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin was the most commonly used anticoagulant for VTE prophylaxis in 366 out of the total 704 (51.9%) patients in the analysis cohort. Two hundred and sixteen patients (52, 95% confidence interval [47.1–56.9%]) received appropriate prophylactic agents out of 415 patients who were eligible for prophylaxis according to the ACCP 2016 guidelines. On the other hand, 199 (72.1, 95% confidence interval [66.4–77.3%) patients received prophylaxis out of 276 ineligible patients. The rate of compliance to guidelines showed wide variations according to the type of hospital, specialty, and the patients’ age. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only age was a significant predictor of appropriate VTE prophylaxis (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The rates of the appropriate use of VTE prophylaxis are low in Lebanon and Jordan. There is a lack of compliance to guidelines for VTE prophylaxis use for hospitalized patients in both countries.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-021-00261-2.

[Prevention of thromboembolic disease in elderly patients admitted to medical wards]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the suitability of the prevention of thromboembolic disease in elderly patients admitted to medical departments, as well as some associated factors, such as the measures required in order to improve quality and safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study in a tertiary level hospital that included elderly patients that were admitted to medical departments. A simple, non-proportional, randomised sample was used, stratified by department. The risk was measured using the Padua prediction model and the risk assessment model of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) adjusting depending on the number of discharges. A Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) plan was used with three levels, good, (standard 95%, threshold 70%), acceptable (standard 95%, threshold 50%), and not acceptable.

RESULTS

A total of 72 cases from 8 departments were evaluated. Just over half (51.4%) of patients had a high risk of thromboembolic disease (Padua≥4), and 23.6% of bleeding (IMPROVE≥7). Besides the advanced age, the adjusted scores were particularly due to cancer (22%) and reduced mobility (19%) for Padua, and male gender (13%) and renal failure (12%) for IMPROVE. The adjusted overall suitability was 57.5% (95%CI: ±19.0%). The OR for suitable conduct on not starting medication, 1.56 (95%CI: 1.07-2.26). The suitability by department was not uniform: all the lots were acceptable, in 3 with level "good" and in 5 with "acceptable".

CONCLUSIONS

The suitability of thromboembolic prophylaxis in the study hospital maintains acceptable levels, although not homogeneous. There is an opportunity for improvement that must be taken. The data obtained may help in deciding interventions, with LQAS being useful to optimise the evaluation effort.

Prevention of health care associated venous thromboembolism through implementing VTE prevention clinical practice guidelines in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Numerous VTE prevention clinical practice guidelines are available but not consistently implemented. This systematic review explored effectiveness of implementing VTE prevention clinical practice guidelines on VTE risk assessment and appropriateness of prophylaxis in hospitalized adult medical patients and identified the interventions followed to improve the adherence to these guidelines.

METHODS

Six electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, clinical controlled trials, or pre/post evaluation studies up to January 2019. Studies identified were screened for eligibility by two reviewers independently. Data were extracted by two reviewers using a standardized form. Risk of bias was assessed using MINORS and the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Of the 3537 records identified, 36 were eligible; eight studies were included for qualitative synthesis and four for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the studies assessing the impact of implementing VTE clinical practice guidelines favored appropriate prophylaxis (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.97, 552 patients). Potential risk of bias was assessed to be low for 28% of the studies. However, using GRADE, the certainty of the evidence of all outcomes was rated very low quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of randomized controlled trials in this area reduces the quality of the evidence available. The evidence from before-after studies suggests that the implementation of VTE clinical practice guidelines may increase the practice of VTE risk assessment and appropriate prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018085506.

A Prospective Observational Cohort of Clinical Outcomes in Medical Inpatients prescribed Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis Using Different Clinical Risk Assessment Models(COMPT RAMs)

The Caprini and Padua venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment models (RAMs) are used to assess VTE risk in surgical and in medical patients respectively. This study aims to compare the proportion of medical inpatients eligible for VTE prophylaxis using the hospital Caprini-based RAM to using the Caprini and Padua RAMs and to assess the associated clinical outcomes. In a prospective observational study, we assessed 297 adult medical inpatients for whom VTE thromboprophylaxis was initiated according to the hospital Caprini-based RAM, referred to as the Lebanese American University Medical Center RAM (LAUMC-RAM). The Padua, Caprini and IMPROVE bleeding risk scores were also assessed for all patients. Bleeding and thromboembolism were evaluated at 14 and 30 days post VTE risk assessment. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis was warranted in 97.6%, 99.7%, and 52.9% of patients using the Caprini-based, Caprini, and Padua RAMs respectively. The Caprini-based and Caprini RAMs were highly correlated (r = 0.873 p < 0.001) and were significantly less correlated with the Padua RAM. Major and overall bleeding occurred in 1.4% and 9.2% respectively. VTE was reported in 0.4% with no VTE related mortality. In hospitalized medical patients, the Caprini-based RAM can accurately distinguish low and high VTE risk without resulting in increased risk of bleeding.

Graduated compression stockings in prevention of venous thromboembolism among acutely ill medical patients aged over 75 years: a French national survey

Background: The thromboprophylactic efficacy of graduated compression stockings (GCS) has not yet been demonstrated in acutely ill medical patients, and guidelines vary considerably. Older acutely ill medical patients appear to constitute a distinctive population presenting high risks of both thrombosis and bleeding.

Objective: To evaluate the practices and beliefs of a panel of French geriatricians regarding GCS management in acutely ill medical patients aged over 75 years.

Methods: A survey was designed to study French geriatric practice concerning GCS use for thromboprophylaxis.

Results: A total of 111 geriatricians answered the questionnaire. Among the responders, 46% declared frequent or very frequent prescription of GCS for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients, 54% declaring that they frequently re-evaluated GCS prescription during the patient’s hospitalization. The main reason reported for discontinuing GCS use was patient request. Regarding complications of GCS, 87% of responders declared having already noted adverse effects with the use of GCS, although 80% estimated the risk of complications to be low or very low. In the context considered, the efficacy of wearing GCS was believed to be high or very high for 73% of responders. GCS prescription was judged to be in accordance with evidence-based medicine for 69%.

Conclusion: There is a gap between the frequent use of GCS to prevent VTE in older patients presenting an acute medical illness and the availability of data concerning their efficacy, safety, and management by nurses. Prospective trials including clinical and cost effectiveness are needed.

What has changed in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for hospitalized patients over recent decades: review article

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common disease with high rates of morbidity and mortality and is considered the number one cause of avoidable mortality among hospitalized patients. Although VTE incidence is extremely high in all countries and there is ample evidence that thromboprophylaxis inexpensively reduces the rate of thromboembolic complications in both clinical and surgical patients, a great deal of doubt remains with respect to patient safety with this type of intervention and in relation to the ideal thromboprophylaxis methods. Countless studies and evidence-based recommendations confirm the efficacy of prophylaxis for prevention of VTE and/or patient deaths, but it remains underutilized to this day. This article presents a wide-ranging review of existing prophylaxis methods up to the present, from guidelines and national and international studies of thromboprophylaxis.

Compliance with current VTE prophylaxis guidelines and risk factors linked to complications of VTE prophylaxis in medical inpatients: a prospective cohort study in a Spanish internal medicine department

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the degree of compliance with the current guidelines regarding venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in medical patients during admission and to identify risk factors linked to complications of VTE prophylaxis.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

The Internal Medicine Department of the University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (tertiary referral hospital).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 396 hospitalised, elderly patients who did not undergo surgery and had no active or previous oral anticoagulation or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment (during the previous year) and who received VTE prophylaxis during admission.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The degree of compliance with the current guidelines was estimated by calculating PADOVA and IMPROVE indexes in all cases. We analysed the development of the following complications: major and minor bleeding, major and minor haematoma and decrease of platelet count.

RESULTS

We found that VTE prophylaxis was correctly indicated in 88.4% of patients. We found two (0.5%) cases with major bleeding, 17 (4.3%) with minor bleeding, 30 (7.6%) with decreased platelet count, 29 (7.3%) with major haematoma and 82 (20.7%) with minor haematoma. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, the presence of major haematomas was linked to obesity (OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.8 to 9.2, p=0.001), concomitant antiplatelet treatment (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1 to 6.5, p=0.03) and enoxaparin use (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.1 to 10.9, p=0.029), and the presence of minor haematomas was associated with PADOVA index <4 points (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.5 to 6.4, p=0.003) and diabetes mellitus (OR 2; 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7, p=0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications during VTE prophylaxis in elderly hospitalised medical patients are frequent even with correct application of current guidelines. The main factors linked to haematomas were obesity and concomitant antiplatelet treatment, the presence of which should lead physicians to exercise extreme caution. The use of tinzaparin for VTE prophylaxis in these patients could have a better safety profile.

Venous thromboembolism risks and prophylaxis in King Fahad Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk factors, physician's compliance, and implementation of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis at our hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in King Fahad Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia, from July 2015 to September 2015. We used the ACCP 2012 guidelines to assess the VTE risk and to determine whether patients had received the recommended prophylaxis. All hospital inpatients aged 14years or older were assessed for risk of VTE by reviewing the hospital chart. The primary endpoint was the rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 414 patients were studied. Their mean age was 47.74±20.4years, and 208 (50.2%) were female. There were 292 (70.5%) patients at high risk and 73 (17.6%) at moderate risk. As per the ACCP criteria, 375 (90.5%) patients were at risk for VTE and qualified for prophylaxis. Although 227 (60.5%) received some form of prophylaxis, only 144 (38.4%) of them received ACCP-recommended VTE prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

In our hospital, most of the patients are at high risk for developing VTE. The VTE prophylaxis guideline is not properly implemented and is underutilized. Strategies should be developed and implemented to ensure patient safety.

Thromboprophylaxis and mortality among patients who developed venous thromboembolism in seven major hospitals in Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) during hospitalization is a serious and potentially fatal condition. Despite its effectiveness, evidence-based thromboprophylaxis is still underutilized in many countries including Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

Our objectives were to determine how often hospital-acquired VTE patients received appropriate thromboprophylaxis, VTE-associated mortality, and the percentage of patients given anticoagulant therapy and adherence to it after discharged.

METHODS

This study was conducted in seven major hospitals in Saudi Arabia. From July 1, 2009, till June 30, 2010, all recorded deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) cases were noted. Only patients with confirmed VTE diagnosis were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1241 confirmed VTE cases occurred during the 12-month period. Most (58.3%) of them were DVT only, 21.7% were PE, and 20% were both DVT and PE. 21.4% and 78.6% of confirmed VTE occurred in surgical and medical patients, respectively. Only 40.9% of VTE cases received appropriate prophylaxis (63.2% for surgical patients and 34.8% for medical patients; P < 0.001). The mortality rate was 14.3% which represented 1.6% of total hospital deaths. Mortality was 13.5% for surgical patients and 14.5% for medical patients (P > 0.05). Appropriate thromboprophylaxis was associated with 4.11% absolute risk reduction in mortality (95% confidence interval: 0.24%-7.97%). Most (89.4%) of the survived patients received anticoagulation therapy at discharge and 71.7% of them were adherent to it on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Thromboprophylaxis was underutilized in major Saudi hospitals denoting a gap between guideline and practice. This gap was more marked in medical than surgical patients. Hospital-acquired VTE was associated with significant mortality. Efforts to improve thromboprophylaxis utilization are warranted.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: adherence and compliance to ACCP guidelines in DIONYS registry

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health care problem resulting in significant mortality, morbidity and increase in medical expenses. Patients with malignant diseases represent a high risk population for VTE. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) proposed, since 1986, prophylaxis guidelines that are unequally respected in surgical practice.

METHODS

DIONYS is a multinational, longitudinal and non-interventional registry including patients having undergone abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer in Latin America, Africa and the Middle East. Patients were evaluated with regard to VTE prophylaxis, during three consecutive visits, for their adherence to ACCP 2008 guidelines. Data were collected on type and duration of VTE prophylaxis, adherence to guidelines, and compliance with prescriptions, complications and possible reasons for omission of prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and June 2012, 921 adult patients were included and divided into abdominal (435), pelvic (390) and combined abdominal and pelvic surgery (96), 65.4 % being females. VTE prophylaxis was prescribed to 90 % of patients during hospitalization and to 28.3 % after hospital discharge. Prescriptions adhered to ACCP guidelines in 73.9 % of patients during hospitalization and 18.9 % after discharge. The reason of non-adherence was mainly the clinical judgment by the physician that the patient did not need a prophylaxis. The most commonly prescribed type of prophylaxis was pharmacological (low molecular weight heparin).

CONCLUSION

A wide gap exists between VTE prophylaxis in daily practice and the ACCP 2008 guidelines, in abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery. A better awareness of surgeons is probably the best guarantee for improvement of VTE prophylaxis in surgical wards.

Evaluation of VTE Prophylaxis in an Educational Hospital

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common preventable cause of hospital death; the burden of VTE includes the management of the acute event (deep vein thrombosis [DVT]/pulmonary embolism) and the chronic subsequents such as postthrombotic syndrome and recurrent DVT. All experts agree that despite the abundance of knowledge available on VTE and how to prevent it, it is still underused, and since the first step in prophylaxis is to identify those who are at high risk of VTE, several risk assessment models have been developed to identify these patients and provide appropriate prophylaxis. In our study, the institutional guideline in a tertiary educational hospital is the Caprini score (2006), a comparison was conducted between the institutional guideline and the American College of Chest Physicians guideline (ACCP ninth edition [ACCP-9]) in terms of the degree of agreement of the actual prophylaxis with the institutional guideline and the ACCP-9 and the differences in risk levels. The concordance with the ACCP-9 guideline was higher than with the institutional guideline, specifically in those patients receiving prophylaxis, and there was an overestimation of the risk levels in the institutional guideline, especially in medical patients. The replacement of the existing Caprini-2006 with the ACCP-9 is prudent, since it agrees with the physicians’ clinical judgment and may result in reduced use of pharmacologic prophylaxis which could lead to lower costs and fewer adverse effects.

Common characteristics of patients diagnosed with upper-extremity venous thromboembolism during hospitalization: a descriptive study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore the common characteristics of patients diagnosed with upper-extremity venous thromboembolism (UEVTE) during hospitalization.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective chart review.

SETTING

This study was performed at a Midwest multisite hospital of 5 acute-care hospitals and 2051 beds.

SAMPLE

The sample was composed of 777 hospitalized adult patients who had a positive upper-extremity venous Doppler from July 2008 to July 2009.

RESULTS

Patients were adults with a mean age of 66.6 (SD, 17.0) years and mean hospital stay of 15.7 (SD, 12.4) days. When assessing the arm clots, 398 patients (51.2%) had a right arm clot, 317 patients (40.8%) had a left arm clot, and 62 patients (8.0%) had clots in both arms. Patients were primarily admitted with medical conditions, and more than one-half were overweight or obese (59.2%). Nearly 50% of patients were at the highest venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk upon admission (n = 362), were tobacco users (n = 379), and had surgeries or invasive procedures performed prior to upper-extremity venous Doppler (n = 395). In 58.6% of the patients, chemoprophylaxis through intravenous anticoagulation therapy was administered during the first 3 days of admission. In patients with an intravenous catheter in an arm, UEVTE was likely to occur in the same arm (right and left arm, P < .001).

IMPLICATIONS

Nurses caring for patients with characteristics commonly found in cases of UEVTE should regularly monitor the arms of their patients and communicate findings in shift reports to heighten awareness of UEVTE risk. In addition, patients with medical diagnoses that prevent use of early anticoagulation for VTE prophylaxis such as gastrointestinal bleed, hematologic disorders, trauma, and hemorrhagic strokes should be frequently assessed for UEVTE. Learning the characteristics of patients who had UEVTE during their hospitalization and the role of early and late anticoagulation in the development of UEVTE would advance nurse assessment and lead to novel interventions and future research.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients. A retrospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the incidence of VTE in hospitalized medical patients and prophylaxis applied in accordance with the 8th ACCP guidelines and the National PRETEMED guide for thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

Discharge lists were reviewed to select the first consecutive 20 patients, aged ≥ 40 years and admitted ≥ 4 days to the Internal Medicine Departments of 79 Spanish hospitals. Exclusion criteria were: admission for diagnostic procedures, VTE or surgical illness, or care during hospitalization provided by the local investigator.

RESULTS

From September 2011 to July 2012, 2845 discharge reports were evaluated and 1623 were considered eligible for the study. Overall 930 (57.3%) patients of this group were at risk of VTE according to the ACCP guidelines, 759 (81.6%) received VTE prophylaxis (mechanical or pharmacological) and 159 (17.1%) had at least one risk factor that might contraindicate anticoagulant use. The proportion of patients at VTE risk according to the ACCP and National PRETEMED guidelines with no risk factors of bleeding that did not receive prophylaxis was 16.3% and 17.2%, respectively. During hospitalization, there were 14 (0.9%) episodes of symptomatic VTE, 12 (86%) of which occurred in patients receiving prophylaxis. VTE rate was 1.3% among patients with VTE risk that received prophylaxis and 3.5% in patients that also had one risk factor that might contraindicate anticoagulant use.

CONCLUSIONS

In a setting characterized by high thromboprophylaxis compliance most of the episodes occurred in patients receiving pharmacological prophylaxis. Patients with combined VTE and bleeding risk factors showed the highest rate of both symptomatic VTE and prophylaxis failure.

Thromboprophylaxis use and concordance with guidelines among medical and surgical patients in Morocco

INTRODUCTION

No data are available on thromboprophylaxis use in Morocco. Our aim was to characterize patients at risk of venous thromboembolism and assess the rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a national, observational, multicentre survey of venous thromboembolism risk and thromboprophylaxis use in hospitalized patients. Data were collected on a predefined date in three university hospitals in Morocco using a standardized pre-printed form. Thromboembolic risk was assessed according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 2008 guidelines. Patients were classified as "thromboprophylaxis indicated" or "thromboprophylaxis not indicated".

RESULTS

784 patients were analysed: 307 (39.2%) medical and 477 (60.8%) surgical. 421 (53.7%) were female. Medical patients were older than surgical patients (57.6 ± 11.5 vs. 46.2 ± 16.9 years, p<0.0001) and were more likely to have risk factors for thromboembolism (50.5% vs. 45.7% of patients, p=NS). 57% of patients without contraindications or bleeding risk were at risk of thromboembolism according to ACCP guidelines and thromboprophylaxis was prescribed to 42.8% of these patients. In contrast, 7.4% of patients with no thromboembolic risk also received thromboprophylaxis (proportion agreement: 61.0%; Kappa=0.296). Over half (54.5%) of medical patients at risk of thromboembolism did not receive thromboprophylaxis whereas 6.3% of those with no risk did receive it (proportion agreement: 76.4%; Kappa=0.433). These figures were 57.9% and 9.2%, respectively, for surgical patients (proportion agreement: 52.7%; Kappa=0.191). Thromboprophylaxis was given to 19.2% of patients with contraindications or a bleeding risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational initiatives are imperative to inform doctors about appropriate thromboprophylaxis.

Venous thromboembolism risk assessment, prophylaxis practices and interventions for its improvement (AVAIL-ME Extension Project, Iran)

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health issue worldwide. Data about VTE prophylaxis practices in developing countries are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives of this survey were to define the VTE risk factors in hospitalized patients, to determine the rates of VTE prophylaxis administration and guideline compliance and to assess the effects of an educational program on VTE prophylaxis practices in Iran.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on 1219 patients from twenty hospitals in Iran were extracted from the AVAIL-ME Extension project main databank. VTE risks were categorized according to the Caprini Risk Assessment Model. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to assess factors influencing VTE prophylaxis. We also examined the impact of an educational program which consisted of awareness, risk assessment, internal protocol implementation and re-assessment, on VTE prophylaxis practices.

RESULTS

Of 1219 patients, 789 (65%) and 430 (35%) were surgical and medical, respectively. VTE risks, categorized in low, moderate, high and very high were detected in 14%, 17%, 26% and 43% of patients respectively with a total of 1042(85%) patients being at risk for VTE. Of 882 (85%) eligible patients for VTE prophylaxis, 737 (83.5%) received any drug prophylaxis of whom 265 (62%) were medical and 472 (60%) were surgical. ACCP guidelines compliance was 60% and 33% in surgical and medical patients respectively. Any VTE prevention, drug prophylaxis, mechanical prophylaxis and guideline adherence were, 48% vs. 64%, 45% vs. 60%, 6% vs. 9% and 34% vs. 45% respectively (p<00.1) before and after implementation of the VTE educational program.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an overall improvement in VTE prevention, areas such as inappropriate use of VTE prophylaxis in a large number of patients, significant under-use of mechanical devices and guideline adherence require closer attention. VTE awareness education is beneficial in improving VTE prophylaxis in Iran.

Renal failure as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in critically Ill patients: a cohort study

RATIONALE

The relationship between kidney function and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in critically ill patients is not well studied. The main objective of this study was to evaluate this relationship in patients admitted to a medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 798 patients admitted to a tertiary-care ICU and prospectively followed for the development of clinically suspected and radiologically diagnosed deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Patients were divided based on admission creatinine and dialysis history into five groups: normal kidney function, RIFLE classes R, I and F (combined=acute kidney injury [AKI]) and endstage renal disease (ESRD). We compared VTE prophylaxis practices and VTE incidence in these groups and evaluated renal failure as a VTE risk factor using multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 798 patients, 27.2% had AKI and 10.1% had ESRD. Unfractionated heparin use was similar in the five groups but enoxaparin use was less frequent in AKI (13.4%) and ESRD (3.8%) patients compared with patients with normal kidney function (39.0%). VTE occurred in 7.6% of patients with normal renal function, 7.8% AKI patients and 2.5% ESRD patients (p=0.22). The adjusted hazard ratios for VTE compared to patients with normal kidney function were 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-1.47) for RIFLE class R, 1.19 (95% CI, 0.83-1.70) for RIFLE class I, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.59-1.14) for RIFLE class F and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.49-1.02, p=0.06) for ESRD.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither AKI nor ESRD was an independent risk factors for critically ill patients.

Venous thromboembolism-related mortality and morbidity in King Fahd General Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious and underestimated potentially fatal disease with an effective prophylactic antithrombotic therapy that is usually underused.

OBJECTIVES

The primary study objective is to determine the percentage of VTE patients who received prophylactic antithrombotic therapy according to ACCP guidelines. Secondary study objectives are determining prevalence of confirmed VTE mortality among all cause hospital mortalities, measuring adherence to anticoagulation treatment after discharge and number of VTE events among those patients.

METHODS

During the period from first of July 2008 till 30 of June 2009, we collected all hospital deaths, all patients with confirmed VTE diagnosis at King Fahd General Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Only patients with confirmed VTE diagnosis were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Five hundred cases with clinical diagnosis of VTE were identified. Out of them 178 were confirmed to be VTE. 36.5% of them received prophylactic antithrombotic therapy. Case fatality rate was 20.8% representing 1.9% of hospital deaths. Case fatality rate was 31% and 3.1% for patients who did not receive thromboprophylaxis and patients who received it, respectively (P < 0.0001). 66.3% and 33.7% of confirmed VTE cases occurred in surgical and medical patients respectively. Only 44.1% of surgical patients and 21.7% of medical patients received prophylaxis (P < 0.01). Case fatality rate is 11% for surgical patients and 40% for medical patients (P < 0.001). Of 141 survived cases, 118 (83.7%) were adherent to anticoagulation therapy after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

VTE prophylaxis guideline is not properly implemented and extremely underutilized. Mortality from VTE is significantly higher in patients who did not receive VTE prophylaxis. In the absence of regular post-mortem practice VTE related mortality rate would be difficult to estimate and likely will be underestimated. Health authorities should enforce VTE prophylaxis guideline within the healthcare system.

The appropriateness of enoxaparin use in Lebanese hospitals: a quality evaluation study

BACKGROUND

Although, guidelines for the appropriate use of enoxaparin are published, yet the extent of their implementation in clinical practice is still questionable. Furthermore, the optimal dosing of enoxaparin in special populations such as renal insufficiency and obesity remains controversial. In the Middle East, there are insufficient data on the appropriateness of enoxaparin use in different indications.

OBJECTIVE

(1) To assess the appropriateness of enoxaparin dosing and duration per indication in compliance with the recommended guidelines and their impact on safety and efficacy outcomes in Lebanese health care centers. (2) To evaluate the influence of the hospital type (teaching vs. non-teaching) on the extent of compliance with established guidelines.

SETTING

Seventeen health care centers in Lebanon, including teaching and non-teaching hospitals.

METHODS

An observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted in 17 Lebanese hospitals. Data on demographics, indication, dosing regimen and clinical outcomes were collected. The appropriateness of dosing practices was determined as per the ACCP guidelines and the FDA dosing recommendations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The appropriateness of enoxaparin dosing was compared across different hospital type and among special populations including severe renal insufficiency and very obese patients.

RESULTS

Of the 463 patients who participated in the study, 40% received improper enoxaparin dosing, which was mostly observed in the VTE prophylaxis group (41.6%, P < 0.001). When comparing the overall dosing practices in Lebanese hospitals, there was no statistically significant difference in the correctness of enoxaparin dosing between teaching and non-teaching hospitals (61.6% vs. 58.2%, P = 0.449), respectively. Only 11.5% of renally impaired patients and 59.4% of obese patients received correct doses.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the improper practice and thus the need of implementation of clinical practice guidelines for the dosing of enoxaparin, in Lebanese hospitals.

The AVAIL ME Extension: a multinational Middle Eastern survey of venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major worldwide problem.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives of this survey were to identify patients at risk for VTE, to define the rate of patients receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis and to examine the frequency of the presence of guidelines and their application.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten countries, 101 hospitals and a total of 4983 patients were included in this multinational cross-sectional survey. Standardized case report forms were filled out by trained individuals on one predefined day. Risks were categorized according to the Caprini Risk Assessment Model. Logistic regressions were carried out to assess factors that determined VTE prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Of 4983 patients, 3368 (68%) and 1615 (32%) were surgical and medical, respectively. Seven hundred and seventy-two (15.5%) were considered to be at low risk, 1001 (20%) at moderate risk, 1289 (26%) at high risk and 1921 (38.5%) at very high risk for VTE. Of 3575 (72%) patients who were eligible to receive VTE prophylaxis, 2747 (77%) received any drug prophylaxis. Among these patients 720/1056 (68%) and 2027/2519 (80%) were medical and surgical patients, respectively. The overall compliance with ACCP guidelines was 38%, being 24% for medical patients and 44% for surgical patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this large multinational survey, although indicating overall improvement in VTE prophylaxis, identify a considerable number of patients who either did not receive any VTE prophylaxis or received it inappropriately. Although more medical patients were at risk for VTE, they were given prophylaxis less frequently than surgical patients. Concordance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines was higher in surgical patients, but overall application of these tools was unacceptably low.

Antithrombotic prophylaxis in the middle East

Several factors have been proposed to explain the persistence of a high incidence of venous thromboembolism worldwide with its associated morbidity and mortality. Underutilization of anticoagulants and failure of adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines are emerging global health concerns. We herein review this alarming observation with special emphasis on the Middle East region. We also discuss strategies that could help control this increasingly reported problem.