Feasibility and safety of a 12-week INR follow-up protocol over 2 years in an anticoagulation clinic: a single-arm prospective cohort study

Application of eHealth Tools in Anticoagulation Management After Cardiac Valve Replacement: Scoping Review Coupled With Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation management can effectively prevent complications in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement (CVR). The emergence of eHealth tools provides new prospects for the management of long-term anticoagulants. However, there is no comprehensive summary of the application of eHealth tools in anticoagulation management after CVR.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective is to clarify the current state, trends, benefits, and challenges of using eHealth tools in the anticoagulation management of patients after CVR and provide future directions and recommendations for development in this field.

METHODS

This scoping review follows the 5-step framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched 5 databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase using keywords such as "eHealth," "anticoagulation," and "valve replacement." We included papers on the practical application of eHealth tools and excluded papers describing the underlying mechanisms for developing eHealth tools. The search time ranged from the database inception to March 1, 2023. The study findings were reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). Additionally, VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) was used to construct visualization maps of countries, institutions, authors, and keywords to investigate the internal relations of included literature and to explore research hotspots and frontiers.

RESULTS

This study included 25 studies that fulfilled the criteria. There were 27,050 participants in total, with the sample size of the included studies ranging from 49 to 13,219. The eHealth tools mainly include computer-based support systems, electronic health records, telemedicine platforms, and mobile apps. Compared to traditional anticoagulation management, eHealth tools can improve time in therapeutic range and life satisfaction. However, there is no significant impact observed in terms of economic benefits and anticoagulation-related complications. Bibliometric analysis suggests the potential for increased collaboration and opportunities among countries and academic institutions. Italy had the widest cooperative relationships. Machine learning and artificial intelligence are the popular research directions in anticoagulation management.

CONCLUSIONS

eHealth tools exhibit promise for clinical applications in anticoagulation management after CVR, with the potential to enhance postoperative rehabilitation. Further high-quality research is needed to explore the economic benefits of eHealth tools in long-term anticoagulant therapy and the potential to reduce the occurrence of adverse events.

Questions and Answers on Practical Thrombotic Issues in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Guidance Document from the Italian Working Group on Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology

In patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the prevalence of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases is elevated. Moreover, various features, also including pro-thrombotic status, further predispose these patients to increased risk of ischemic cardiovascular events. Thus, the identification of optimal antithrombotic strategies in terms of the risk–benefit ratio and outcome improvement in this setting is crucial. However, debated issues on antithrombotic therapies in patients with COVID-19 are multiple and relevant. In this article, we provide ten questions and answers on risk stratification and antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatments in patients at risk of/with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection based on the scientific evidence gathered during the pandemic.

Impact of an extended International Normalized Ratio follow-up interval on healthcare use among veteran patients on stable warfarin doses

PURPOSE

To analyze the impact of a 12-week extended International Normalized Ratio (INR) follow-up interval on healthcare use.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of the use of an extended INR follow-up interval of up to 12 weeks was conducted over 2 years in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic. A detailed protocol was used to extend the INR follow-up interval to 5-6 weeks and then 7-8 weeks and 11-12 weeks. The number of planned and unplanned anticoagulation encounters, procedures requiring warfarin interruption, telephone triage phone calls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were collected. A post hoc subanalysis was also completed on participants who were scheduled for 4 consecutive 12-week intervals.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, at 12 months there was a mean decrease in planned anticoagulation encounters of 2.24 visits (p < 0.001) among 44 participants. From 12 to 24 months compared to baseline, there was a mean decrease in planned anticoagulation encounters of 3.13 visits (p < 0.001) and an increase of 0.54 unplanned anticoagulation encounters (p = 0.04) among 39 participants. The remainder of healthcare use variables were not statistically significantly different from baseline at any time point. Of the 15 participants scheduled for 4 consecutive 12-week intervals, there was a decrease from baseline of approximately 5 visits over the course of a year (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

An extended INR follow-up interval appears to decrease anticoagulation healthcare use without an increase in acute healthcare use. While this intervention could be cost-effective, institutions need to consider safety, efficacy, and feasibility prior to implementation.

Patient Satisfaction With Extended International Normalized Ratio Follow-up Intervals in a Veteran Population

Background: For highly stable warfarin patients, limited data exists regarding patient satisfaction on extended international normalized ratio (INR) follow-up intervals and how this population compares with patients on a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Objective: To assess the impact on patient satisfaction of extending INR follow-up intervals. Methods: Veterans on stable warfarin doses had extended INR follow-up intervals up to 12 weeks in a single-arm prospective cohort study for 2 years. This analysis included participants who completed at least 2 Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scales (DASS). The primary outcome was the change in the DASS. A focus group described participant experiences. Participant satisfaction was compared to patients on a DOAC. Results: Of the 51 participants, 48 were included in the warfarin extended INR follow-up group. Compared with baseline, the mean DASS score (42.9 ± 12.08) was worse at 24 months (46.82 ± 15.2, P = 0.0266), with a small effect size (Cohen's d = 0.29). The 8 participants in the focus group were satisfied with the extended INR follow-up interval but would be uncomfortable extending follow-up past 2 to 3 months. The extended INR follow-up interval study had similar DASS scores as the 33 participants included on DOAC therapy (46.8 ± 15.1, P = 0.9970) but may be limited by differing populations using DOACs. Conclusion and Relevance: For patients currently stable on warfarin therapy, extending the INR follow-up interval up to 12 weeks or changing to a DOAC does not appear to improve patient satisfaction.