Platelet count trends and response to fondaparinux in a cohort of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia suspected patients after pulmonary endarterectomy

Long-term Outcomes and Predictors of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension After Pulmonary Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the preferred treatment for CTEPH patients which can significantly improve symptoms and pulmonary hemodynamics. Therefore, this retrospective study evaluated the long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and analyze the predictors of long-term outcomes for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

METHODS

From 2002-2020, 76 CTEPH patients successfully discharged after PEA in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital were followed-up by scheduled clinical visits or telephone interviews. The follow-up time lasted for 18 years and median time was 7.29 years.

RESULTS

The survival rate at 1,3,5,10,15 years postoperatively was 100.00%, 97.10%, 95.40%, 89.80% and 82.90%, respectively. Multivariate logistics regression analysis showed that postoperative mPAP (hazard ratio: 1.144; 95%confidence interval: 1.018-1.285; P = 0.023) was associated with a higher risk of late death, right atrium right and left diameters (hazard ratio: 1.113; 95%confidence interval, 1.006-1.231; P = 0.038) were associated with a higher risk of major adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary endarterectomy is an effective way to treat CTEPH. Long-term outcome is excellent for patients who undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy who survived from peri-operation time. Postoperative mPAP is a significant prognostic factor for long-term death and right atrium right and left diameters is a significant prognostic factor for major adverse events. That shows patients with high postoperative mPAP and right atrium right and left diameter should be followed up closely.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: Risk factors and management

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) may cause chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Current knowledge regarding prevalence and risk factors for CTEPH among APS patients is limited. We sought to determine clinical features and biomarkers that could identify APS subjects suffering from CTEPH, and describe the prevalence, course and treatment outcomes of patients with APS-CTEPH.

METHODS

504 APS patients were treated in our center during 2008 to 2019. We studied clinical and laboratory features of 69 APS patients, comparing 19 patients diagnosed with CTEPH (APS-CTEPH) and treated accordingly, with 50 consecutive age and gender matched patients with no evidence of pulmonary hypertension (APS-No-CTEPH).

RESULTS

CTEPH prevalence was 3.8% in our APS cohort and was linked with the following parameters: primary APS (p < 0.05); prior pulmonary embolism (p < 0.001); recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) (p < 0.001); lower platelet counts (p < 0.001); triple anti-phospholipid antibodies positivity (p < 0.001), higher titers of anti-cardiolipin IgG (p < 0.001), anti-B2GPI IgG (p < 0.001), and high Russell viper venom time ratio (RVVT-ratio) (p < 0.05). Additionally, history of catastrophic APS was more prevalent in APS-CTEPH vs APS-No-CTEPH (p < 0.05). Of APS-CTEPH patients, 15/19 underwent pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA): In 12/15 the procedure was elective and resulted in good perioperative and long-term outcomes, while only 1 of 3 patients that underwent urgent PEA survived.

CONCLUSIONS

CTEPH is relatively common in APS. Primary APS, prior PE, recurrent VTE, thrombocytopenia and specific anti-phospholipid antibodies predict CTEPH in APS. Active assessment for CTEPH in APS patients should be considered, as PEA was found to be effective and relatively safe, especially if electively performed.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of anticoagulants for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of non-heparin anticoagulants for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are not fully established, and the optimal treatment strategy is unknown. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine precise rates of platelet recovery, new or progressive thromboembolism (TE), major bleeding, and death for all non-heparin anticoagulants and to study potential sources of variability.

METHODS

Following a detailed protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42020219027), EMBASE and Medline were searched for all studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients treated with non-heparin anticoagulants (argatroban, danaparoid, fondaparinux, direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC], bivalirudin, and other hirudins) for acute HIT. Proportions of patients with the outcomes of interest were pooled using a random-effects model for each drug. The influence of the patient population, the diagnostic test used, the study design, and the type of article was assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 3194 articles screened, 92 studies with 119 treatment groups describing 4698 patients were included. The pooled rates of platelet recovery ranged from 74% (bivalirudin) to 99% (fondaparinux), TE from 1% (fondaparinux) to 7% (danaparoid), major bleeding from 1% (DOAC) to 14% (bivalirudin), and death from 7% (fondaparinux) to 19% (bivalirudin). Confidence intervals were mostly overlapping, and results were not influenced by patient population, diagnostic test used, study design, or type of article.

DISCUSSION

Effectiveness and safety outcomes were similar among various anticoagulants, and significant factors affecting these outcomes were not identified. These findings support fondaparinux and DOACs as viable alternatives to conventional anticoagulants for treatment of acute HIT in clinical practice.

Ovarian vein thrombosis after coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection in a pregnant woman: case report

Corona virus outbreak started in December 2019, and the disease has been defined by the World Health Organization as a public health emergency. Coronavirus is a source of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) due to complications such as over-coagulation, blood stasis, and endothelial damage. In this study, we report a 26-year-old pregnant woman with coronavirus who was hospitalized with a right ovarian vein thrombosis at Besat Hospital in Sanandaj. Risk classification for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) disease is of crucial importance for the forecast of coronavirus.