Trends in management and outcomes of pulmonary embolism with a multidisciplinary response team

Evolution of Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams in the United States: A Review of the Literature

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of cardiovascular mortality, with varying presentations and management challenges. Traditional treatment approaches often differ, particularly for submassive/intermediate-risk PEs, because of the lack of clear guidelines and comparative data on treatment efficacy. The introduction of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) aims to standardize and improve outcomes in acute PE management through multidisciplinary collaboration. This review examines the conception, evolution, and operational mechanisms of PERTs while providing a critical analysis of their implementation and efficacy using retrospective trials and recent randomized trials. The study also explores the integration of advanced therapeutic devices and treatment protocols facilitated by PERTs. PERT programs have significantly influenced the management of both massive and submassive PEs, with notable improvements in clinical outcomes such as decreased mortality and reduced length of hospital stay. The utilization of advanced therapies, including catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, has increased under PERT guidance. Evidence from various studies, including those from the National PERT Consortium, underscores the benefits of these multidisciplinary teams in managing complex PE cases, despite some studies showing no significant difference in mortality. PERT programs have demonstrated potentials to reduce morbidity and mortality, streamlining the use of healthcare resources and fostering a model of sustainable practice across medical centers. PERT program implementation appears to have improved PE treatment protocols and innovated advanced therapy options, which will be further refined as they are employed in clinical practice. The continued expansion of the capabilities of PERTs and the forthcoming results from ongoing randomized trials are expected to further define and optimize management protocols for acute PEs.

Association of race, ethnicity and insurance status with outcomes for patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated by PERT: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Management of PE has become streamlined with the implementation of PE Response Teams (PERT). Race, ethnicity and insurance status are known to influence the outcomes of patients with acute PE. However, whether the implementation of PERT-based care mitigates these racial and ethnic disparities remains unknown. Our aim was to assess the association of race, ethnicity and insurance with outcomes for patients with acute PE managed by PERT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 290 patients with acute PE, who were admitted to one of three urban teaching hospitals in the Mount Sinai Health System (New York, NY) from January 2021 to October 2023. A propensity score-weighted analysis was performed to explore the association of race, ethnicity and insurance status with overall outcomes.

RESULTS

Median age of included patients was 65.5 years and 149 (51.4%) were female. White, Black and Asian patients constituted 56.2% (163), 39.6% (115) and 3.5% [10] of the cohort respectively. Patients of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity accounted for 8.3% [24] of the sample. The 30-day rates of mortality, major bleeding and 30-day re-admission were 10.3%, 2.1% and 12.8% respectively. Black patients had higher odds of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 1.445; p < 0.0001) when compared to White patients. Patients of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity had lower odds of receiving catheter-directed thrombolysis (OR: 0.966; p = 0.0003) and catheter-directed or surgical embolectomy (OR: 0.906; p < 0.0001) when compared to non-Hispanic/Latino patients. Uninsured patients had higher odds of receiving systemic thrombolysis (OR: 1.034; p = 0.0008) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (OR: 1.059; p < 0.0001), and lower odds of receiving catheter-directed or surgical embolectomy (OR: 0.956; p = 0.015) when compared to insured patients, although the odds of 30-day mortality and 30-day major bleeding were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Within a cohort of PE patients managed by PERT, there were significant associations between race, ethnicity and overall outcomes. Hispanic or Latino ethnicity and uninsured status were associated with lower odds of receiving catheter-directed or surgical embolectomy. These results suggest that disparities related to ethnicity and insurance status persist despite PERT-based care of patients with acute PE.

Racial and gender disparities in the management of acute pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess race and sex disparities in use and outcomes of various interventions in patient with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

We included 129,445 patients with acute PE from the NIS from January 2016 to December 2019. Rates of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), CDT with ultrasound, systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, percutaneous thrombectomy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and mechanical ventilation were compared between race and sex subgroups, along with length of hospital stay, major bleeding events, mortality, and other adverse events. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to adjust for variables that were significantly different between race and sex, including demographic factors, comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Compared with White male patients, all subgroups had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality highest in Hispanic male patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.090-1.640; P < .01). All subgroups also had a higher odds of major bleeding events and increased length of stay. All subgroups also had lower odds of receiving CDT, lowest in Black female patients (OR, 0.740; 95% CI, 0.660-0.820; P < .001) and Hispanic female patients (0.780; 95% CI, 0.650-0.940; P < .001) compared with White male patients. There was no significant difference in the use of systemic thrombolysis among subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Black and Hispanic patients and female patients are less likely to undergo CDT compared with White male patients, in addition to having higher odds of mortality, major bleeding, and increased length of stay after management of PE. Further efforts are needed to mitigate disparate outcomes of PE management at not only an institutional, but at a national, level to promote health care equality.

Impact of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) in the prognosis of patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

The effect of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) in the short-term prognosis of patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) lacks clarity. We therefore aimed at evaluating the effect of a PERT team on short-term mortality among patients with acute PE.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute symptomatic PE enrolled in a single-center registry between 2007 and 2022. We used propensity score matching to compare treatment effects for patients with similar predicted probabilities of receiving management by the PERT team. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days following the diagnosis of PE. The secondary outcome was 30-day PE-related mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 2,902 eligible patients who had acute symptomatic PE, 223 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7%-8.7%) were managed by the PERT team. Two hundred and seven patients who were treated by the PERT were matched with 207 patients who were not. Matched pairs did not show a statistically significant lower all-cause (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63-1.89) or PE-related death (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.47-3.62) for PERT management compared with no PERT management through 30 days after diagnosis of PE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that multidisciplinary care of patients with acute symptomatic PE by a PERT team is not associated with a significant reduction in short-term all-cause or PE-related mortality.

Effect of a pulmonary embolism response team on the management and outcomes of patients with acute pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effects of a multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism (PE) response team (PERT) on the management and outcomes of patients with acute PE.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients presenting to our institution with a diagnosis of PE from July 2020 to April 2022. The primary outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, major bleeding events defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, and use of catheter-directed interventions (CDIs). The secondary outcome measures included 30-day and 12-month mortality, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay, vasopressor requirement, and cardiac arrest. Continuous variables were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test and categorical variables using the χ2 or Fisher exact test, as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 279 patients with acute PE were identified, of whom 79 (28%), 173 (62%), and 27 (10%) were considered to have low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk, respectively. The PERT was activated for 133 patients (47.7%). Saddle and main pulmonary artery embolisms (P < .001), right ventricular strain (P= .001), right ventricular dysfunction (P < .001), coexisting deep vein thrombosis (P < .001), and dyspnea as a presenting symptom (P = .008) were significantly associated with PERT activation. Patients evaluated by the PERT were more likely to undergo CDI (49% vs 27%; P < .001) across all risk groups and less likely to have an inferior vena cava filter placed (1% vs 5%; P = .04). PERT consultation showed numerical, but nonstatistically significant, trends toward reduced in-hospital (2% vs 5%; P = .2) and 30-day (2% vs 8%; P = .06) mortality but similar rates of 12-month mortality (7% vs 8%; P = .7). PERT activation was also associated with a trend toward reduced rates of major bleeding (2% vs 7%), cardiac arrest (2% vs 7%), and vasopressor requirement (9% vs 18%). PERT consultations decreased the median number of ICU days by one half; however, we did not observe any differences in the total hospital length of stay between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, PERT consultations were associated with significantly higher usage of CDIs and improved clinical outcomes, including reduced mortality and a lower rate of major bleeding events. PERT consultations were also associated with fewer ICU days, suggesting a possible economic benefit for implementing PERTs, although further research is needed to confirm that conclusion.

Contemporary trends in mortality related to high-risk pulmonary embolism in US from 1999 to 2019

BACKGROUND

Population-based data on high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) mortality trends in the United States (US) are scant.

OBJECTIVES

To assess current trends in US mortality related to high-risk PE over the past 21 years and determine differences by sex, race, ethnicity, age and census region.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) to determine trends in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 people, due to high-risk PE. To calculate nationwide annual trends, we assessed the average (AAPC) and annual percent change (APC) with relative 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using Joinpoint regression.

RESULTS

Between 1999 and 2019, high-risk PE was listed as the underlying cause of death in 209,642 patients, corresponding to an AAMR of 3.01 per 100,000 people (95 % CI: 2.99 to 3.02). AAMR from high-risk PE remained stable from 1999 to 2007 [APC: -0.2 %, (95 % CI: -2.0 to 0.5, p = 0.22)] and then significantly increased [APC: 3.1 % (95 % CI: 2.6 to 3.6), p < 0.0001], especially in males [AAPC: 1.9 % (95 % CI: 1.4 to 2.4), p < 0.001 vs AAPC: 1.5 % (95 % CI: 1.1 to 2.2), p < 0.001]. AAMR increase was more pronounced in those <65 years, Black Americans, and residents of rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

In an US population analysis, high-risk PE mortality rate increased, with racial, sex-based, and regional variations. Further studies are needed to understand root causes for these trends and to implement appropriate corrective strategies.

Pulmonary embolism response team for hospitalized patients with submassive and massive pulmonary embolism: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of mortality with presentation varying between few or no symptoms to sudden death. This makes timely and appropriate treatment extremely important. Multidisciplinary PE response teams (PERT) have emerged to improve the management of acute PE. This study aims to describe the experience of a large multihospital single-network institution with PERT.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted for submassive and massive PE between 2012 and 2019 was conducted. The cohort was divided based on time of diagnosis and hospital into two groups: non-PERT included patients treated at hospitals that did not initiate PERT and patients diagnosed before the introduction of PERT (June 1, 2014); and the PERT group included those admitted after June 1, 2014, to a hospital with PERT. Patients with low-risk PE and those who had admissions in both time periods were excluded. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality at 30, 60, and 90 days. Secondary outcomes included causes of death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay (LOS), total hospital LOS, type of treatment, and specialty consultations.

RESULTS

We analyzed 5190 patients, with 819 (15.8%) being in the PERT group. Patients in the PERT group were more likely to receive extensive workup that included troponin-I (66.3% vs 42.3%; P < .001) and brain natriuretic peptide (50.4% vs 20.3%; P < .001). They also more often received catheter-directed interventions (12% vs 6.2%; P < .001) rather than anticoagulation monotherapy. Mortality outcomes were similar between both groups at all measured timepoints. Rates of ICU admission (65.2% vs 29.7%; P < .001), ICU LOS (median, 64.7 hours; interquartile range [IQR], 41.9-89.1 hours vs median, 38 hours; IQR, 22-66.4 hours; P < .001), and total hospital LOS (median, 5 days; IQR, 3-8 days vs median, 4 days; IQR, 2-6 days; P < .001) were all higher among the PERT group. Patients in the PERT group were more likely to receive vascular surgery consultation (5.3% vs 0.8%; P < .001) and the consultation occurred earlier in the admission when compared with the non-PERT group (median, 0 days; IQR, 0-1 days vs median, 1 day; IQR, 0-1; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented here showed that there was no difference in mortality after PERT implementation. These results suggest that the presence of PERT increases the number of patients receiving a full PE workup with cardiac biomarkers. PERT also leads to more specialty consultations and more advanced therapies such as catheter-directed interventions. Further research is needed to assess the effect of PERT on long-term survival of patients with massive and submassive PE.