The effect of prior biopsy scheme on prostate cancer detection for repeat biopsy population: results of the 14-core prostate biopsy technique

Correlations Between MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and PET Standard Uptake Values in Simultaneous MR-PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer

This study evaluated the hypothesis that 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET SUV, obtained via an advanced DL approach, correlates better with MR ADC maps than values from conventional PET-MR. Additionally, we aimed to identify the optimal SUV threshold for maximum correlation with ADC values. A cohort of 32 prostate cancer patients underwent CT and corresponding PET-MR imaging. The dataset underwent K-fold cross-validation, dividing it into four folds. In each fold, 24 patients were used for training, and 8 for validation to create DL models. ADC maps from 27 out of 32 patients were successfully aligned with T2 images for detailed analysis, revealing an inverse correlation (ρ = -0.20 to -0.51) between ADC and SUV values in prostate cancer zones. Statistically significant differences in mean SUV values were observed between PETMRI and PETDL. DL-based SUV values show a stronger correlation with ADC than conventional PET-MR values in our investigation.

The Role of [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer in Patients with or without Previous Negative Biopsy: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

In this paper we systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. A critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in the analysis. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, its use combined with MRI improved sensitivity for csPCa detection, thus potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies. Overall, [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. We performed a critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in this analysis. QUADAS-2 evaluation was adopted for quality analyses. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-11 was the radiotracer of choice in 15 studies, while [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-617 was used in another 3. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. The total number of patients included was 1379, ranging from 15 to 291, with a median age of 64 years (range: 42–90). The median baseline PSA value was 12.9 ng/mL, ranging from 0.85 to 4156 ng/mL. Some studies evaluated the PSMA uptake comparing the SUVmax of suspicious lesions with the SUVmax of the normal biodistribution to find out optimal cut-off points. In addition, some studies suggested a significant association between PSA levels, PSA density, and [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT finding. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT seems to be more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, in some trials, the combination of PSMA PET/CT and MRI improved the NPV in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than MRI alone. Our findings are limited by the small numbers of studies and patient heterogeneity. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT is a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI. Furthermore, its use combined with MRI improves sensitivity for csPCa detection and can avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Factors affecting the diagnosis of prostate cancer through 12 quadrant guided prostate biopsy

PURPOSE

Investigate the factors affecting the efficacy of the widely used 12-quadrant prostate biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

METHODS

The data of 1846 male patients between 45 and 75 years of age was evaluated. The patients were subdivided into groups according to age, blood prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels prostate volume (PV), digital rectal examination (DRE) findings, and pathology results. The tumour detection rates in the 12-quadrant biopsies were compared with PV, PSA levels, and DRE results of the grouped patients.

RESULTS

The tumour detection rate decreased with increasing PV in patients 45-75 years of age and with a PSA level ≤ 14.5. No decrease was detected in patients 45-60 years of age or those aged 61-75 years with a PSA ≤ 6.99 and suspicious DRE findings. A decrease in the tumour detection rate with increasing PV was observed in the other three subgroups of patients in this age group, who had a PSA ≤ 6.99, and normal DRE findings but a PV ≤ 40, PV 41-80, or PV ≥ 81.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though there is no statistically significant relationship between PV and the prostate cancer detection rate in patients 45-60 years of age, the cancer detection rate decreased with increasing PV in three of the four subgroups of patients between the ages of 61 and 75 years. Our study results have demonstrated that an individualised approach can play an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT combining ADC value of MRI in the diagnosis of naive prostate cancer: Perspective of radiologist

Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission computed tomography /computed tomography (PET/CT) is more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting prostate cancer (PCa). We evaluated the value of Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with MRI in treatment-naive PCa.This retrospective study was approved by the hospital ethics committee. The MRI and Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging data of 63 cases of highly suspected PCa were enrolled in this study. The SUVmax and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and their ratio, were assessed as diagnostic markers to distinguish PCa from benign disease.There were 107 prostate lesions detected in 63 cases. Forty cases with 64 malignant primary lesions were confirmed PCa, whereas 23 cases had 43 benign lesions. PSMA-avid lesions correlated with hypointense signal on ADC maps and hyperintense signal on diffusion-weighted imaging. The ADC of PCa was lower than that of benign lesions, and SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC of PCa was higher than that of benign lesions (P < .01). ADC had significant negative correlation with Gleason score (GS) and SUVmax, SUVmax, and SUVmax/ADC positively correlated with GS. From ROC analysis, we established cutoff values of ADC, SUVmax, and SUVmax/ADC at 1.02 × 10mm/s, 11.72, and 12.35, respectively, to differentiate PCa from benign lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 90.6%, 58.1%, and 0.816 for ADC, 67.2%, 97.7%, and 0.905 for SUVmax, and 81.2%, 88.4%, and 0.929 for SUVmax/ADC, respectively.Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT combined with MRI offers higher diagnostic efficacy in the detection of PCa than either modality alone.

Dutasteride for the prevention of prostate cancer in men with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: results of a phase III randomized open-label 3-year trial

PURPOSE

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is a potential precursor of prostate cancer (PCa), and patients with HGPIN are at high risk for PCa development. Objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of dutasteride 0.5 mg in PCa prevention among men with isolated HGPIN on biopsy.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, phase III, open-label 3-year trial assessed dutasteride versus active surveillance in patients with HGPIN. Patients were randomized to dutasteride 0.5 mg daily or active surveillance. Per-protocol prostate biopsies were performed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months until cancer detection or study end. The primary end point was cancer-free survival (CFS). An intention-to-treat analysis was done for patients who underwent at least one per-protocol biopsy. An efficacy analysis was done for patients who completed the study. CFS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 220 men were randomized (dutasteride, n = 107; surveillance, n = 113). PCa was detected in 47.6: 49.1 % in the surveillance group and 45.9 % in the treatment group (p = 0.66). The detected PCa differentiation by Gleason score (GS) was GS 6 in 76.9 %, GS 7 in 19.8 %, and GS ≥ 8 in 3.3 %, with no difference between groups. The 3-year PCa-free survival was 43.6 % in the surveillance and 49.6 % in the dutasteride group (log rank p = 0.57). Limitations include a relatively high non-adherence rate, open-label design, and baseline sextant biopsy scheme.

CONCLUSIONS

Dutasteride 0.5 mg for 3 years did not lower the PCa detection rate but did not worsen detected PCa characteristics in men with HGPIN.

3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging improves the prostate cancer detection rate in transrectral ultrasound-guided biopsy

The detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) using traditional biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of 3-Tesla (3-T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to TRUS-guided prostate biopsy and to investigate which subgroup of patients had the most evident improvement in PCa detection rate. A total of 420 patients underwent 3-T MRI examination prior to the first prostate biopsy and the positions of suspicious areas were recorded respectively. TRUS-guided biopsy regimes included systematic 12-core biopsy and targeted biopsy identified by MRI. Patients were divided into subgroups according to their serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, PSA density (PSAD), prostate volume, TRUS findings and digital rectal examination (DRE) findings. The ability of MRI to improve the cancer detection rate was evaluated. The biopsy positive rate of PCa was 41.2% (173/420), and 41 of the 173 (23.7%) patients were detected only by targeted biopsy in the MRI-suspicious area. Compared with the systematic biopsy, the positive rate was significantly improved by the additional targeted biopsy (P=0.0033). The highest improvement of detection rate was observed in patients with a PSA level of 4–10 ng/ml, PSAD of 0.12–0.20 ng/ml², prostate volume >50 ml, negative TRUS findings and negative DRE findings (P<0.05). Therefore, it is considered that 3-T MRI examination could improve the PCa detection rate on first biopsy, particularly in patients with a PSA level of 4–10 ng/ml, PSAD of 0.12–0.20 ng/ml², prostate volume of >50 ml, negative TRUS findings and negative DRE findings.

Current significance of the finding of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the prostate biopsy

INTRODUCTION

High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is regarded as a precursor of prostate cancer (PC). However, its relationship to cancer has changed throughout the literature, being currently poorly defined and remains controversial for urologists in their clinical practice. Because of his frequency and the impact on patient outcomes that the lack of consensus clinical attitude could carry out, it seems advisable to review the understanding of this disease.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this literature review is to summarize the main features of this entity (histopathology, molecular, epidemiological) and evaluate their relationship with prostate adenocarcinoma, explaining the variation of incidence seen in the literature and the clinical significance of their finding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Review of the literature, based on the research and analysis of publications found in Pubmed with the words "prostate" and "intraepithelial neoplasms".

RESULTS

The HGPIN detection rate has increased to the extent that it has increased the number of punctures in prostate biopsies. With the current biopsy schemes (10-12 punctures), the detection rate of PC in repeat biopsies is similar in patients with and without isolated HGPIN. However, HGPIN multifocality predicts increased risk of PC detection in repeat biopsy.

CONCLUSION

HGPIN detection is common with current biopsy schemes. Its genetic relationship with PC is clear and its multifocality is the most important predictor factor of PC.

Distal phalangeal necrosis in the extremities as a paraneoplastic syndrome in prostate cancer: an extremely rare case

Paraneoplastic syndromes (PNSs) are rare disorders which are triggered by an altered immune system response to a neoplasm. Although prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common urological malignancy associated with PNSs, literature is lacking in defining the cases representing different PNSs in PCa. Herein, we present a 50-year-old man with fulminant distal phalangeal necrosis in the lower extremities after a diagnosis of PCa. Additionally, we review the literature in light of this case.

Preneoplasia in the prostate gland with emphasis on high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

There are a variety of morphological patterns and processes that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), inflammation with or without atrophy, and adenosis (atypical adenomatous hyperplasia) have all been given candidate status as precursor lesions of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Based on decades of research, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HPIN), a proliferative lesion of prostatic secretory cells, has emerged as the most likely morphological pre-invasive lesion involved in the evolution of many but not all prostatic adenocarcinomas. In this manuscript, we briefly discuss other proposed precursors of prostatic adenocarcinoma and then focus on the history, diagnostic criteria and morphology of HPIN. The incidence of HPIN and its relationship to prostate cancer is reviewed. The differential diagnosis of large glandular patterns in the prostate is discussed in depth. Finally, we summarise the recent clinicopathological studies evaluating the clinical significance of HPIN and discuss follow-up strategies in men diagnosed with HPIN.

Precursors of prostate cancer

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the only accepted precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma, according to numerous studies of animal models and man; other proposed precursors include atrophy and malignancy-associated changes (with no morphologic changes). PIN is characterized by progressive abnormalities of phenotype and genotype that are intermediate between benign prostatic epithelium and cancer, indicating impairment of cell differentiation and regulatory control with advancing stages of prostatic carcinogenesis. The only method of detection of PIN is biopsy because it does not significantly elevate serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and cannot be detected by ultrasonography. The mean incidence of PIN in biopsies is 9% (range, 4%-16%), representing about 115,000 new cases of isolated PIN diagnosed each year in the United States. The clinical importance of PIN is its high predictive value as a marker for adenocarcinoma, and its identification warrants repeat biopsy for concurrent or subsequent carcinoma, especially when multifocal or observed in association with atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP). Carcinoma develops in most patients with PIN within 10 years. Androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy decrease the prevalence and extent of PIN, suggesting that these forms of treatment may play a role in prevention of subsequent cancer. Multiple clinical trials to date of men with PIN have had modest success in delaying or preventing subsequent cancer.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) has been established as a precursor to prostatic adenocarcinoma. HGPIN shares many morphological, genetic, and molecular signatures with prostate cancer. Its predictive value for the development of future adenocarcinoma during the prostate-specific antigen screening era has decreased, mostly owing to the increase in prostate biopsy cores. Nevertheless, a literature review supports that large-volume HGPIN and multiple cores of involvement at the initial biopsy should prompt a repeat biopsy of the prostate within 1 year. No treatment is recommended for HGPIN to slow its progression to cancer.

Is sampling transitional zone in patients who had prior negative prostate biopsy necessary?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the necessity of transitional zone sampling of the prostate during repeat prostate biopsy procedures.

METHODS

Patients treated for lower urinary tract symptoms with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) from April 2004 to July 2009 whom had at least 1 negative prostate biopsy prior to this treatment were chosen as the study group. A histopathological analysis of surgical specimens was employed to determine cancer detection rates.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with the mean age of 66.1, mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 10.4 ng/mL and mean prostate volume of 63.2 cc were included. Of the patients, 50 had 1 biopsy set, 17 had 2 sets, 4 had 3 sets and 1 patient had 4 sets of consecutive biopsies. All biopsy results were negative for prostate cancer. After the analysis of surgical specimens obtained during TURP, cancer was detected in 3 patients (4.2%). Transitional zone sampling during prostate biopsies did not significantly improve the cancer detection rate. Transitional zone sampling was performed in 29 biopsies taken from 20 patients, one of whom (5%) had prostate cancer. The remaining 71 biopsies were taken from 52 patients without transitional zone sampling, and cancer was detected in 2 (3.8%) of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Since no significant difference was observed between patient groups (those with and those without transitional zone biopsies) in the detection of prostate cancer in the transitional zone, strategies for increasing the number of cores taken from transitional zone during repeat biopsies should be reconsidered.

Significance of atypical small acinar proliferation and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostate biopsy

Purpose

In clinical practice, atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) are two common findings on prostate biopsies. Knowing the frequency of a prostate cancer diagnosis on repeat biopsies would aid primary treating physicians regarding their decisions in suspicious cases.

Materials and Methods

One hundred forty-three patients in whom biopsies revealed ASAP or HGPIN or both were enrolled in the present study; prostate cancer was not reported in the biopsy specimens and at least one repeat biopsy was performed. Age, digital rectal examination findings, prostate volumes, and free and total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and the biopsy results of the patients were recorded.

Results

Of the 97 patients with ASAP on the first set of biopsies, prostate cancer was diagnosed in the second and third biopsies of 32 and 6 patients, respectively. Prostate cancer was not detected in the second or third biopsies of the 40 patients with HGPIN in the first biopsy. Of the 6 patients with ASAP+HGPIN in the first biopsy, prostate cancer was detected in 3 patients in the second biopsy and in 1 patient in the third biopsy.

Conclusions

The diagnosis of ASAP is a strong risk factor for prostate cancer. A repeat biopsy should be performed for the entire prostate subsequent to the diagnosis of ASAP. In patients with HGPIN according to the biopsy result, the clinical decision should be based on other parameters, such as PSA values and rectal examination, and a repeat biopsy should be avoided if the initial biopsy was performed with multiple sampling.

Prostate cancer detection after a negative prostate biopsy: lessons learnt in the Cleveland Clinic experience

Urologists are often faced with the dilemma of managing patients with a negative initial prostate biopsy in whom clinical or pathological risk for prostate cancer still exists. Such real-life challenging scenarios might raise questions such as: Who should undergo further biopsies? What are the optimal predictors for prostate cancer on subsequent biopsies? What is the optimal biopsy protocol that should be used? When to stop the biopsy cascade? The last decade has witnessed numerous studies that have analyzed factors conferring a significant risk for cancer discovered on repeat biopsies. We and others have developed predictive models to aid decision-making regarding pursuing further biopsies. For decades, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia has been considered a strong risk indicator for subsequent cancer. However, it has been recently shown that only through segmentation of this heterogeneous population does the real risk profile emerge. Biopsy templates underwent modification regarding the number and location of cores with emergence of the transrectal or brachytherapy grid transperineal saturation biopsy. However, the best biopsy protocol remains controversial. We have refined the initial biopsy template to a 14 core initial biopsy template that optimizes cancer detection, and have shown that transrectal saturation biopsy significantly improves cancer detection for repeat biopsy. Another concern is the overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer on repeat biopsies, so we explored ways to limit this, and to deal with its ramifications. Through carrying out a Medline literature search, we critically evaluated pertinent articles together with emphasis of our own journey in this arena to assist in the decision-making process for repeat biopsy population.

Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the one well-documented precursor to adenocarcinoma of the prostate. This review article defines both low- and high-grade PIN. Unusual variants of high-grade PIN are illustrated. Benign lesions that may be confused with high-grade PIN, including central zone histology, clear cell cribriform hyperplasia, and basal cell hyperplasia are described and illustrated. High-grade PIN is also differentiated from invasive acinar (usual) and ductal adenocarcinoma. The incidence of high-grade PIN, its relationship to carcinoma (including molecular findings), and risk of cancer on rebiopsy are covered in detail. Finally, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, a controversial entity, is discussed and differentiated from high-grade PIN.