The occurrence of atrial fibrillation in dialysis patients and its association with left atrium volume before and after dialysis

Left atrial function evaluation by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in patients with vasovagal syncope

OBJECTIVES

Evidence indicates left atrial (LA) involvement in vasovagal syncope (VVS). The LA regulates left ventricular filling during the cardiac cycle. We aimed to assess LA function in patients with VVS by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography.

METHODS

Sixty-nine consecutive patients with VVS were recruited. Based on the head-up tilt test (HUTT) results, the study population was divided into two groups: HUTT+ (n = 45) and HUTT- (n = 24). Fifty-one consecutive subjects were enrolled as the control group. LA myocardial deformation parameters were measured by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography to evaluate LA function.

RESULTS

Maximal, minimal, and pre-P LA volumes were lower in patients with VVS. Strain and strain rate during reservoir, conduit, and contraction phases in VVS patients with HUTT+ or HUTT- were not statistically significantly different from those in the control group. Additionally, the volumetric parameters of LA function showed no difference in statistical significance between the three study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While LA phasic function was not different between the two groups of VVS patients with HUTT+ or HUTT- and the control group, LA size during the three LA phases was smaller in patients with VVS.

Ultrafiltration rate and incident atrial fibrillation among older individuals initiating hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Higher ultrafiltration (UF) rates are associated with numerous adverse cardiovascular outcomes among individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis. We undertook this study to investigate the association of UF rate and incident atrial fibrillation in a large, nationally representative US cohort of incident, older hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

We used the US Renal Data System linked to the records of a large dialysis provider to identify individuals ≥67 years of age initiating hemodialysis between January 2006 and December 2011. We applied an extended Cox model as a function of a time-varying exposure to compute adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of delivered UF rate and incident atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

Among the 15 414 individuals included in the study, 3177 developed atrial fibrillation. In fully adjusted models, a UF rate >13 mL/h/kg (versus ≤13 mL/h/kg) was associated with a higher hazard of incident atrial fibrillation [adjusted HR 1.19 (95% CI 1.07-1.30)]. Analyses using lower UF rate thresholds (≤10 versus >10 mL/h/kg and ≤8 versus >8 mL/h/kg, separately) yielded similar results. Analyses specifying the UF rate as a cubic spline (per 1 mL/h/kg) confirmed an approximately linear dose-response relationship between the UF rate and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation: risk began at UF rates of ~6 mL/h/kg and the magnitude of this risk flattened, but remained elevated, at rates ≥9 mL/h/kg.

CONCLUSION

In this observational study of older individuals initiating hemodialysis, higher UF rates were associated with higher incidences of atrial fibrillation.

Prevalence and associated factors of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation among end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance haemodialysis: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia worldwide and it aggravates cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; however, this is largely under-diagnosed. Moreover, among end-stage renal disease patients on haemodialysis, AF is substantially more common and serious. The researchers conducted this study to assess the prevalence of, and the factors correlated with AF in Jordanian haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis conducted from October 2018 to February 2019 in four tertiary hospitals, the researchers enrolled all consenting patients aged 18 years or older who were on haemodialysis for at least three months prior to the study. We screened for AF clinically by pulse palpation, precordial auscultation, by an automated blood pressure monitor and an electrocardiogram. The researchers reported qualitative variables as counts and frequencies, while continuous variables were summarised using the mean or median where necessary. We used multiple logistic regression with backward selection to identify independent risk factors of AF.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients were enrolled; mean age was 54.8 ± 15.6 years (from 20 to 86), and 44.3% of them were women. The prevalence of AF was found to be 7.8% (95% CI, 4.8-12.2), with no gender disparity. Age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; p = 0.031), history of ischaemic heart disease (AOR = 3.74; 95% CI, 1.09-12.34; p = 0.033), history of smoking (AOR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.60; p = 0.019), and low interdialytic weight gain (AOR = 0.50: 95% CI, 0.25-0.91; p = 0.031) were independently correlated to AF.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of AF among patients on maintenance haemodialysis is high, but largely undiagnosed. AF is generally associated with advancing age, history of ischaemic heart disease, lower interdialytic weight gain, and history of smoking. We suggest routine check-up of AF in this high-risk group of patients as anticoagulant therapy if indicated may prevent serious complications. However, there is a need for large-scale cohort studies and for the creation of regional chronic kidney disease and dialysis registries in the Middle East region.

[Atrial Fibrillation in Patients on Dialysis Therapy: Epidemiology, Prognosis and Choice of Anticoagulant Therapy]

The review presents data on the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in patients on dialysis therapy. It is shown that dialysis-dependent patients with non-valve atrial fibrillation prognosis is extremely unfavorable, significantly increased risk of death due to both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. Scales to assess the risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation on program dialysis are not validated. The lack of data from randomized clinical trials makes it much more difficult to choose anticoagulant therapy in patients with terminal stage of chronic kidney disease on dialysis who have undergone kidney transplantation. Therefore, the need for anticoagulant therapy and the choice of drugs in patients in this category should be made on the basis of a personalized multidisciplinary approach, taking into account comorbid pathology and the patient's preferences.