Genetic and biochemical characterization of poly 3-hydroxybutyrate depolymerase from Diaphorobacter sp. PCA039

Can bioplastics always offer a truly sustainable alternative to fossil-based plastics?

Bioplastics, comprised of bio-based and/or biodegradable polymers, have the potential to play a crucial role in the transition towards a sustainable circular economy. The use of biodegradable polymers not only leads to reduced greenhouse gas emissions but also might address the problem of plastic waste persisting in the environment, especially when removal is challenging. Nevertheless, biodegradable plastics should not be considered as substitutes for proper waste management practices, given that their biodegradability strongly depends on environmental conditions. Among the challenges hindering the sustainable implementation of bioplastics in the market, the development of effective downstream recycling routes is imperative, given the increasing production volumes of these materials. Here, we discuss about the most advisable end-of-life scenarios for bioplastics. Various recycling strategies, including mechanical, chemical or biological (both enzymatic and microbial) approaches, should be considered. Employing enzymes as biocatalysts emerges as a more selective and environmentally friendly alternative to chemical recycling, allowing the production of new bioplastics and added value and high-quality products. Other pending concerns for industrial implementation of bioplastics include misinformation among end users, the lack of a standardised bioplastic labelling, unclear life cycle assessment guidelines and the need for higher financial investments. Although further research and development efforts are essential to foster the sustainable and widespread application of bioplastics, significant strides have already been made in this direction.

Biodegradation of Biodegradable Polymers in Mesophilic Aerobic Environments

Finding alternatives to diminish plastic pollution has become one of the main challenges of modern life. A few alternatives have gained potential for a shift toward a more circular and sustainable relationship with plastics. Biodegradable polymers derived from bio- and fossil-based sources have emerged as one feasible alternative to overcome inconveniences associated with the use and disposal of non-biodegradable polymers. The biodegradation process depends on the environment's factors, microorganisms and associated enzymes, and the polymer properties, resulting in a plethora of parameters that create a complex process whereby biodegradation times and rates can vary immensely. This review aims to provide a background and a comprehensive, systematic, and critical overview of this complex process with a special focus on the mesophilic range. Activity toward depolymerization by extracellular enzymes, biofilm effect on the dynamic of the degradation process, CO2 evolution evaluating the extent of biodegradation, and metabolic pathways are discussed. Remarks and perspectives for potential future research are provided with a focus on the current knowledge gaps if the goal is to minimize the persistence of plastics across environments. Innovative approaches such as the addition of specific compounds to trigger depolymerization under particular conditions, biostimulation, bioaugmentation, and the addition of natural and/or modified enzymes are state-of-the-art methods that need faster development. Furthermore, methods must be connected to standards and techniques that fully track the biodegradation process. More transdisciplinary research within areas of polymer chemistry/processing and microbiology/biochemistry is needed.

Long-term field performance of a conventional and modified bioretention system for removing dissolved nitrogen species in stormwater runoff

Bioretention systems are efficient at removing particulates, metals, and hydrocarbons from stormwater runoff. However, managing dissolved nitrogen (N) species (dissolved organic N, NH₄⁺, NO₂^-, NO₃^-) is a challenge for these systems. This paper reports the results of a long-term field study comparing N removal of: 1) a modified bioretention system that included an internal water storage zone containing wood chips to promote denitrification and 2) a conventional bioretention system. The systems were studied, without and with plants, under varying hydraulic loading rates (HLRs) and antecedent dry conditions (ADCs). Both bioretention designs were efficient at removing NH₄⁺ (83% modified, 74% conventional), while removal of NOx (NO₂^--N + NO₃^--N) was significantly higher in the modified system (81% modified, 29% conventional). Results show that the addition of an internal water storage zone promotes denitrification, resulting in lower effluent TN concentrations (<0.75 mg/L modified, ∼1.60 mg/L conventional). The lowest HLR studied, 4.1 cm/h, provided the longest hydraulic retention time in the internal water storage zone (∼3 h) and had the greatest TN removal efficiency (90% modified, 59% conventional). In contrast to prior short-term studies, ADCs between 0 and 13 days did not significantly affect DOC export or TN removal. A short-term study with Florida friendly vegetation indicated that TN removal performance was enhanced in the conventional bioretention system. This field study provides promising results for improving dissolved N removal by modifying bioretention systems to include an internal water storage zone containing wood chips.