Quantitative Effects of Contrast Enhanced CT Attenuation Correction on PET SUV Measurements

Comprehensive literature review of oral and intravenous contrast-enhanced PET/CT: a step forward?

The integration of diagnostic CT scans into PET/CT facilitates a comprehensive single examination, presenting potential advantages for patients seeking a thorough one-shot check-up. The introduction of iodinated contrast media during PET scanning raises theoretical concerns about potential interference with uptake quantification, due to the modification of tissue density on CT. Nevertheless, this impact appears generally insignificant for clinical use, compared to the intrinsic variability of standardized uptake values. On the other hand, with the growing indications of PET, especially 18F-FDG PET, contrast enhancement increases the diagnostic performances of the exam, and provides additional information. This improvement in performance achieved through contrast-enhanced PET/CT must be carefully evaluated considering the associated risks and side-effects stemming from the administration of iodinated contrast media. Within this article, we present a comprehensive literature review of contrast enhanced PET/CT, examining the potential impact of iodinated contrast media on quantification, additional side-effects and the pivotal clinically demonstrated benefits of an all-encompassing examination for patients. In conclusion, the clinical benefits of iodinated contrast media are mainly validated by the large diffusion in PET protocols. Contrary to positive oral contrast, which does not appear to offer any major advantage in patient management, intravenous iodine contrast media provides clinical benefits without significant artifact on images or quantification. However, studies on the benefit-risk balance for patients are still lacking.

Optimized 18F-FDG PET-CT Method to Improve Accuracy of Diagnosis of Metastatic Cancer

The diagnosis of cancer by FDG PET-CT is often inaccurate owing to subjectivity of interpretation. We compared the accuracy of a novel normalized (standardized) method of interpretation with conventional non-normalized SUV. Patients (n = 393) with various malignancies were studied with FDG PET/CT to determine the presence or absence of cancer. Target lesions were assessed by two methods: (1) conventional SUV_max (conSUV_max) and (2) a novel method that combined multiple factors to optimize SUV (optSUVmax), including the patient's normal liver SUV_max, a liver constant (k) derived from a review of the literature, and use of site-specific thresholds for malignancy. The two methods were compared to pathology findings in 154 patients being evaluated for mediastinal and/or hilar lymph node (MHLNs) metastases, 143 evaluated for extra-thoracic lymph node (ETLNs) metastases, and 96 evaluated for liver metastases. OptSUV_max was superior to conSUV_max for all patient groups. For MHLNs, sensitivity was 83.8% vs. 80.7% and specificity 88.7% vs. 9.6%, respectively; for ETLNs, sensitivity was 92.1% vs. 77.8% and specificity 80.1% vs. 27.6%, respectively; and for lesions in the liver parenchyma, sensitivity was 96.1% vs. 82.3% and specificity 88.8% vs. 23.0%, respectively. Optimized SUV_max increased diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET-CT for cancer when compared with conventional SUV_max interpretation.

Performance of quantitative measurements in [18F]fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography for parathyroid imaging (P2TH study)

Objective

[¹⁸F]Fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is used frequently in addition to [^99mTc]Tc-Sestamibi scintigraphy and ultrasonography for the location of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of quantitative criteria in [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT for localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands. The secondary objective is to highlight a correlation between the detection rate of [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT and serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level.

Materials and methods

In two academic centers, we retrospectively included patients with biological hyperparathyroidism (HPT) and who had [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT. After a visual analysis, to measure the overall performance of [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT, a blind reading was carried out with standardized measurements of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), liver ratio, thyroid ratio, and size ratio. We analyzed the quantitative criteria of [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT compared to the histological results, in particular to identify differences between adenomas and hyperplasias. We compared the performance of each quantitative criterion to the overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT. The detection rate of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands was calculated in subgroups of serum PTH level.

Results

The quantitative criteria in [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT were measured for 120 patients (135 lesions). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve representing SUV_max and liver ratio were significantly increased. The optimal cut-off values represented by the maximum Youden index was >4.12 for SUV_max and >27.4 for liver ratio. Beyond certain threshold values of SUV_max (>4.12) or liver ratio (>38.1), all the lesions were histologically proven adenomas. SUV_max and liver ratio were significantly higher for adenomas than for hyperplasias and differential diagnosis (p = 0.0085 and p = 0.0002). The positivity of [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT was correlated with PTH level. Detection rates were 55.56, 75.56, and 87.5%, respectively, for serum PTH < 70, 70 to 120, and >120 ng/ml.

Conclusion

Semi-quantitative measurements (SUV_max and liver ratio) should be considered as additional tools in interpretation of [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT. These quantitative parameters have lower overall performance but higher specificity than overall visual analysis in identifying an adenoma. Above certain threshold values, all lesions are adenomas. [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT confirms excellent performance for the detection of hyperfunctional parathyroids. For serum PTH levels < 70 ng/ml, the detection rate of [¹⁸F]fluorocholine PET/CT is strongly decreased.

68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT: The Optimum Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) Internal Reference

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) is an important semiquantitative measurement used in the clinical and research domains to assess radiopharmaceutical concentration in tumors versus normal organs, but is susceptible to many factors beyond the tumor biological environment. So, the aim of this study is to identify the optimum internal reference among organs with physiological uptake in ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (DOTA PET/CT) scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved study with waiver of consent included retrospective imaging review of 180 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumors presenting for DOTA PET/CT image acquisition: Ga-⁶⁸ DOTATATE dose was reported as (0.054 mCi/Kg) scans between September 2018 and May 2019. Mean value of body weight normalized SUV (SUV_bw) and lean body mass normalized SUV (SUL) of liver and spleen were measured. Information about the patients and scan characteristics were collected. The paired Grambsch test was used to compare variance among the measured SUVs. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between SUVs and potential patient- and scan-specific confounding factors.

RESULTS

Variance of SUL was significantly lower than variance of SUV_bw in both liver and spleen (p-value < 0.0001). Variances of liver SUV_bw and SUL were significantly lower than the corresponding spleen SUVs. Liver SUL showed the lowest variance (3.69% ± 1.25%) among all measured SUVs.

CONCLUSION

SUL is a more reproducible, less variable, and therefore more reliable quantitative measure in DOTA PET/CT scans, compared SUV_bw. Among the available organs with physiological uptake, liver SUL is the optimum internal reference given the liver's larger size and uniform SUL values resulting in lower variability and better reproducibility.

An account of data entry inconsistencies and their impact on positron emission tomography quantification

Reproducibility is essential to clinical application of positron emission tomography (PET) quantification. Human lapses in data registration and protocol compliance are pervasive sources of intrasite quantification variability. Although rarely assessed or reported, these lapses are ultimately a limitation to harmonization in multicenter clinical trials. A comprehensive account of their possible extent is relayed here.This is a retrospective audit of errors in manual registration of study parameters and in protocol adherence across a sample of in-center research projects over one year (201 patients, 222 PET/CT scans). Discrepancies in patient height and weight; tracer type; dose; injection; and scan times were listed. Correspondent variances in standardized uptake values (SUVs) normalized by body weight, SUV (BW), and body surface area, SUV (BSA), were assessed.Manual misregistrations totalled 41.8%. These were mainly small, but with a few large deviations, and most significant in weight (range: -1-100 kg) and dose (-19 to 12 MBq). Errors were more frequent and generally larger in non-routine studies. This also applied to protocol compliance. A 50.7% noncompliance was found with significant deviations in dose (-106 to 208 MBq) and especially in early scan uptake times (-37 to 54 min). Although misregistrations did not overall translate into significant SUV variability, noncompliance did. These errors contributed a factor 0.02 to 1.45 and 0.71 to 3.09 SUV (BW) change, respectively. SUV (BSA) saw a significant 21% to 22% decrease with mistyped height and weight.Inconsistency was frequent but less prominent in data entry than in protocol compliance. As both caused some substantial SUV variances, intra-site assessments and data checking are required for clinical trials.

Contrast-enhanced small-animal PET/CT in cancer research: strong improvement of diagnostic accuracy without significant alteration of quantitative accuracy and NEMA NU 4-2008 image quality parameters

Background

The use of iodinated contrast media in small-animal positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) could improve anatomic referencing and tumor delineation but may introduce inaccuracies in the attenuation correction of the PET images. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance and accuracy of quantitative values in contrast-enhanced small-animal PET/CT (_CEPET/CT) as compared to unenhanced small animal PET/CT (_UEPET/CT).

Methods

Firstly, a NEMA NU 4–2008 phantom (filled with ¹⁸F-FDG or ¹⁸F-FDG plus contrast media) and a homemade phantom, mimicking an abdominal tumor surrounded by water or contrast media, were used to evaluate the impact of iodinated contrast media on the image quality parameters and accuracy of quantitative values for a pertinent-sized target. Secondly, two studies in 22 abdominal tumor-bearing mice and rats were performed. The first animal experiment studied the impact of a dual-contrast media protocol, comprising the intravenous injection of a long-lasting contrast agent mixed with ¹⁸F-FDG and the intraperitoneal injection of contrast media, on tumor delineation and the accuracy of quantitative values. The second animal experiment compared the diagnostic performance and quantitative values of _CEPET/CT versus _UEPET/CT by sacrificing the animals after the tracer uptake period and imaging them before and after intraperitoneal injection of contrast media.

Results

There was minimal impact on IQ parameters (%SD_unif and spillover ratios in air and water) when the NEMA NU 4–2008 phantom was filled with ¹⁸F-FDG plus contrast media. In the homemade phantom, measured activity was similar to true activity (−0.02%) and overestimated by 10.30% when vials were surrounded by water or by an iodine solution, respectively. The first animal experiment showed excellent tumor delineation and a good correlation between small-animal (SA)-PET and ex vivo quantification (r² = 0.87, P < 0.0001). The second animal experiment showed a good correlation between _CEPET/CT and _UEPET/CT quantitative values (r² = 0.99, P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy of _CEPET/CT versus _UEPET/CT (senior researcher, area under the curve (AUC) 0.96 versus 0.77, P = 0.004; junior researcher, AUC 0.78 versus 0.58, P = 0.004).

Conclusions

The use of iodinated contrast media for small-animal PET imaging significantly improves tumor delineation and diagnostic performance, without significant alteration of SA-PET quantitative accuracy and NEMA NU 4–2008 IQ parameters.

PET/CT mediastinal and liver FDG uptake: effects of biological and procedural factors

INTRODUCTION

To establish the effects of biological and procedural factors on mediastinal and liver [(18) F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in oncological FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 557 patients who had a baseline FDG PET/CT scan in 2008 and 2009. Mediastinal and liver standardised uptake values mean normalised to lean body mass (SUVlbm mean) were measured in each patient. Univariate and multivariate regression models were established. Study population was then dichotomised into low and high body mass index (BMI) groups, and linear regression models were established for the effects of age, incubation period and blood glucose levels.

RESULTS

BMI had the highest adjusted effect (standardised beta coefficient, b = 0.43) (P < 0.001) and partial correlation, adjusting for covariates included in the final model (r = 0.45; P < 0.001) on mediastinal FDG uptake. Partial correlations (r) were 0.22 for age, -0.17 for male gender, -0.25 for incubation period and 0.14 for blood glucose (P < 0.001). The linear regression models showed significant differences in mediastinal FDG uptake between the low and high BMI groups and the effects of age, incubation period and basal blood glucose levels (P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for liver FDG uptake except the partial correlation for incubation period was r = -0.09 (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

BMI has the highest effect and correlation on mediastinal and liver FDG uptake. FDG uptake time has a greater effect on mediastinal than liver SUVlbm mean.

Quantifying the effects of iodine contrast media on standardised uptake values of FDG PET/CT images: an anthropomorphic phantom study

This study aimed to quantify the amount of change in Standardised Uptake Values (SUVs) of PET/CT images by simulating the set-up as closely as possible to the actual patient scanning. The experiments were conducted using an anthropomorphic phantom, which contained an amount of radioactivity in the form of Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in a primary plastic test tube and one litre saline bags, including the insertion of bony structures and another two test tubes containing different concentrations of iodine contrast media. Standard scanning protocols were employed for the PET/CT image acquisition. The highest absolute differences in the SUVmax and SUVmean values of the saline bags were found to be about 0.2 and 0.4, respectively. The primary test tube showed the largest change of 1.5 in both SUVs; SUV max and SUVmean. However, none of these changes were found to be statistically significant. The clinical literature also contains no evidence to suggest that the changes of this magnitude would change the final diagnosis. Based on these preliminary data, we propose that iodine contrast media can be used during the CT scan of PET/CT imaging, without significantly affecting the diagnostic quality of this integrated imaging modality.

Established, emerging and future applications of FDG-PET/CT in the uterine cancer

Integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) is a useful technique to acquire both glucose metabolic and anatomic imaging data using a single device in a single diagnostic session and has opened a new field in clinical oncologic imaging. FDG-PET/CT has been used successfully for the staging, optimization of treatment, re-staging, therapy monitoring, and prognostic prediction of uterine cervical cancer and endometrial cancer as well as various malignant tumours. The present review discusses the current role of FDG-PET/CT in the management of uterine cancer, discussing its usefulness and limitations in the imaging of these patients.

Present and future of FDG-PET/CT in ovarian cancer

Integrated FDG-PET/CT has been used successfully for the diagnosis, staging, restaging, therapy monitoring and prognostic prediction of ovarian cancer as well as various other malignant tumors. Compared with conventional PET/non-contrast CT images, combined PET/contrast-enhanced CT images with intravenous iodine contrast medium and sufficient radiation dose may contribute to a more accurate diagnosis with higher confidence. In the future, tracers other than FDG and integrated PET/MRI will be realized. We herein review the place and role of FDG-PET/CT in the management of ovarian cancer, discussing its usefulness and limitations in the imaging of these patients.

A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements

OBJECTIVE

There is growing interest in using PET/CT for evaluating early response to therapy in cancer treatment. Although widely available and convenient to use, standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements can be influenced by a variety of biologic and technologic factors. Many of these factors can be addressed with close attention to detail and appropriate quality control. This article will review factors potentially affecting SUV measurements and provide recommendations on ways to minimize when using serial PET to assess early response to therapy.

CONCLUSION

Scanner and reconstruction parameters can significantly affect SUV measurements. When using serial SUV measurements to assess early response to therapy, imaging should be performed on the same scanner using the same image acquisition and reconstruction protocols. In addition, attention to detail is required for accurate determination of the administered radiopharmaceutical dose.

PET/CT (and CT) instrumentation, image reconstruction and data transfer for radiotherapy planning

The positron emission tomography in combination with CT in hybrid, cross-modality imaging systems (PET/CT) gains more and more importance as a part of the treatment-planning procedure in radiotherapy. Positron emission tomography (PET), as a integral part of nuclear medicine imaging and non-invasive imaging technique, offers the visualization and quantification of pre-selected tracer metabolism. In combination with the structural information from CT, this molecular imaging technique has great potential to support and improve the outcome of the treatment-planning procedure prior to radiotherapy. By the choice of the PET-Tracer, a variety of different metabolic processes can be visualized. First and foremost, this is the glucose metabolism of a tissue as well as for instance hypoxia or cell proliferation. This paper comprises the system characteristics of hybrid PET/CT systems. Acquisition and processing protocols are described in general and modifications to cope with the special needs in radiooncology. This starts with the different position of the patient on a special table top, continues with the use of the same fixation material as used for positioning of the patient in radiooncology while simulation and irradiation and leads to special processing protocols that include the delineation of the volumes that are subject to treatment planning and irradiation (PTV, GTV, CTV, etc.). General CT acquisition and processing parameters as well as the use of contrast enhancement of the CT are described. The possible risks and pitfalls the investigator could face during the hybrid-imaging procedure are explained and listed. The interdisciplinary use of different imaging modalities implies a increase of the volume of data created. These data need to be stored and communicated fast, safe and correct. Therefore, the DICOM-Standard provides objects and classes for this purpose (DICOM RT). Furthermore, the standard DICOM objects and classes for nuclear medicine (NM, PT) and computed tomography (CT) are used to communicate the actual image data created by the modalities. Care must be taken for data security, especially when transferring data across the (network-) borders of different hospitals. Overall, the most important precondition for successful integration of functional imaging in RT treatment planning is the goal orientated as well as close and thorough communication between nuclear medicine and radiotherapy departments on all levels of interaction (personnel, imaging protocols, GTV delineation, and selection of the data transfer method).

Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies

Purpose

This review aims to provide insight into the factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET images in oncology as well as their influence on repeated measures studies (i.e. treatment response assessment), offering improved understanding both for clinical practice and research.

Methods

Structural PubMed searches have been performed for the many factors affecting quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET. Review articles and references lists have been used to supplement the search findings.

Results

Biological factors such as fasting blood glucose level, FDG uptake period, FDG distribution and clearance, patient motion (breathing) and patient discomfort (stress) all influence quantification. Acquisition parameters should be adjusted to maximize the signal to noise ratio without exposing the patient to a higher than strictly necessary radiation dose. This is especially challenging in pharmacokinetic analysis, where the temporal resolution is of significant importance. The literature is reviewed on the influence of attenuation correction on parameters for glucose metabolism, the effect of motion, metal artefacts and contrast agents on quantification of CT attenuation-corrected images. Reconstruction settings (analytical versus iterative reconstruction, post-reconstruction filtering and image matrix size) all potentially influence quantification due to artefacts, noise levels and lesion size dependency. Many region of interest definitions are available, but increased complexity does not necessarily result in improved performance. Different methods for the quantification of the tissue of interest can introduce systematic and random inaccuracy.

Conclusions

This review provides an up-to-date overview of the many factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET.