Prospective Within-Patient Assessment of the Impact of an Unlabeled Octreotide Pre-dose on the Biodistribution and Tumor Uptake of 68Ga DOTATOC as Assessed by Dynamic Whole-body PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Implications for Diagnosis and Therapy

Monte Carlo investigation of PET [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC activity-administration protocols for consistent image quality

One example of a PET exam that suffers from noise problems is [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC, where patients are generally administered between 100 and 200 MBq [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC, irrespective of size. However, a fixed activity can result in low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in larger patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on image quality with respect to injected activity and patient habitus through Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. Eight anthropomorphic computer phantoms with body mass indices (BMIs) between 19 kg/m2 and 38 kg/m2 and tumours distributed in the liver were simulated using the MC software Gate v8.2 with an activity distribution defined according to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC standardised uptake values. Three activity-administration protocols were simulated: (i) with a fixed activity of 100 MBq, (ii) with the activity scaled by 2 MBq/kg, and (iii) with the activity scaled by a body size-dependent power-function based on the SNR obtained with (ii). BMI, weight, body surface area, and abdominal circumference were evaluated body size parameters. Images were reconstructed with the CASToR software and evaluated for background SNR and lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Large SNR variabilities were obtained with protocols (i) and (ii), while (iii) generated good consistency. Several tumours failed to reach a CNR of 5 for large phantoms with protocol (i), but the CNR was generally improved by (ii) and (iii). An activity scaled by patient habitus generate better image quality consistency, which increases the likelihood that patients receive a similar standard of care.

Impact of Cold Somatostatin Analog Administration on Somatostatin Receptor Imaging: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The interactions between the administration of cold somatostatin analogs (cSAs) and their radiolabeled counterpart remain unclear, and discontinuation before imaging is still advised as a precaution. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the consequences of cSA administration on tumoral and surrounding healthy organs' uptake at somatostatin receptor (SSTR) imaging with SPECT or PET.

METHODS

After registration of the study on Prospero (CRD42022360260), an electronic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: human patients referred for SSTR imaging for oncological purposes; at least 1 examination performed either before cSA administration or after a long-enough withdrawal of cSA treatment; at least 1 examination was performed under cSA treatment. Included articles were independently appraised by 2 authors using the standardized protocol provided by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Discrepancies were solved by consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles were included, 4 using 111In-pentetreotide and 8 using 68Ga-DOTA peptides. Administration of cSAs consistently resulted in decreased spleen and liver uptake (from 6.9% to 80% for spleen, 10% to 60% for liver) and increased tumor-to-background or tumor-to-healthy organ ratios. After cSA treatment, tumor uptake alone was unchanged or moderately decreased. Similar results were noted whether patient was octreotide-naive.

CONCLUSION

Impairment in SSTR imaging quality after cSA administration has not been demonstrated. On the contrary, the administration of cSAs seems to improve the contrast between tumoral lesions and the surroundings.

The effect of long-acting somatostatin analogues on the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE

PURPOSE

According to IAEA/EANM/SNMMI guidelines, long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSAs) should be discontinued 4-6 weeks prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to prevent somatostatin receptor saturation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of continued use of long-acting SSAs during PRRT on the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE on SPECT/CT.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours who were treated with PRRT receiving 7.4 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) control (LA-SSA stopped > 6 weeks prior to PRRT), or continued treatment with (2) long-acting octreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT, or (3) long-acting lanreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT. The uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was quantified in healthy tissues (spleen, liver, kidneys, bone marrow) and tumour lesions on SPECT/CT performed 24 h after PRRT. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine differences in uptake between the long-acting octreotide and long-acting lanreotide groups compared to the control group.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with 135 cycles of PRRT were included: 28 with lanreotide, 50 with octreotide, and 57 cycles without LA-SSAs. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was significantly decreased in liver parenchyma in patients with lanreotide (p < 0.001) and in the spleen in patients with either octreotide or lanreotide (both p < 0.001). No differences were observed for uptake in kidneys, bone marrow, and blood pool. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumours was the same in patients with lanreotide compared to the control (p = 0.862) and in patients with octreotide compared to the control (p = 0.201), independent of tumour location.

CONCLUSION

Long-acting octreotide and lanreotide do not interfere with the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumour lesions 24 h post-injection. Uptake in healthy liver parenchyma significantly decreases after lanreotide administration prior to PRRT, while uptake in healthy spleen tissue significantly decreases with both octreotide and lanreotide administration.

Comparison of somatostatin receptor expression in patients with neuroendocrine tumours with and without somatostatin analogue treatment imaged with [18F]SiTATE

Purpose

Somatostatin analogues (SSA) are frequently used in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. Recently, [18F]SiTATE entered the field of somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the SSR-expression of differentiated gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) measured by [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT in patients with and without previous treatment with long-acting SSAs to evaluate if SSA treatment needs to be paused prior to [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.

Methods

77 patients were examined with standardised [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT within clinical routine: 40 patients with long-acting SSAs up to 28 days prior to PET/CT examination and 37 patients without pre-treatment with SSAs. Maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) of tumours and metastases (liver, lymphnode, mesenteric/peritoneal and bones) as well as representative background tissues (liver, spleen, adrenal gland, blood pool, small intestine, lung, bone) were measured, SUV ratios (SUVR) were calculated between tumours/metastases and liver, likewise between tumours/metastases and corresponding specific background, and compared between the two groups.

Results

SUVmean of liver (5.4 ± 1.5 vs. 6.8 ± 1.8) and spleen (17.5 ± 6.8 vs. 36.7 ± 10.3) were significantly lower (p < 0.001) and SUVmean of blood pool (1.7 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with SSA pre-treatment compared to patients without. No significant differences between tumour-to-liver and specific tumour-to-background SUVRs were observed between both groups (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In patients previously treated with SSAs, a significantly lower SSR expression ([18F]SiTATE uptake) in normal liver and spleen tissue was observed, as previously reported for 68Ga-labelled SSAs, without significant reduction of tumour-to-background contrast. Therefore, there is no evidence that SSA treatment needs to be paused prior to [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.

Somatostatin and Its Receptor System in Colorectal Cancer

Somatostatin (SST)/somatotropin release-inhibiting factor (SRIF) is a well-known neuropeptide, widely distributed in the central and peripheral nervous systems, that regulates the endocrine system and affects neurotransmission via interaction with five SST receptors (SST1-5). In the gastrointestinal tract, the main SST-producing cells include intestinal enteroendocrine cells (EECs) restricted to the mucosa, and neurons of the submucosal and myenteric plexuses. The action of the SRIF system is based on the inhibition of endocrine and exocrine secretion, as well as the proliferative responses of target cells. The SST1–5 share common signaling pathways, and are not only widely expressed on normal tissues, but also frequently overexpressed by several tumors, particularly neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Furthermore, the SRIF system represents the only peptide/G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) system with multiple approved clinical applications for the diagnosis and treatment of several NENs. The role of the SRIF system in the histogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) subtypes (e.g., adenocarcinoma and signet ring-cell carcinoma), as well as diagnosis and prognosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) and pure adenocarcinoma, is poorly understood. Moreover, the impact of the SRIF system signaling on CRC cell proliferation and its potential role in the progression of this cancer remains unknown. Therefore, this review summarizes the recent collective knowledge and understanding of the clinical significance of the SRIF system signaling in CRC, aiming to evaluate the potential role of its components in CRC histogenesis, diagnosis, and potential therapy.