Predicting [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE kidney and tumor accumulation based on [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE diagnostic imaging using semi-physiological population pharmacokinetic modeling

BACKGROUND

Prediction of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE kidney and tumor uptake based on diagnostic [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE imaging would be a crucial step for precision dosing of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. In this study, the population pharmacokinetic (PK) differences between [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE and [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE were assessed and subsequently [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was predicted based on [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE imaging.

METHODS

A semi-physiological nonlinear mixed-effects model was developed for [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE and [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE, including six compartments (representing blood, spleen, kidney, tumor lesions, other somatostatin receptor expressing organs and a lumped rest compartment). Model parameters were fixed based on a previously developed physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE. For [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE, PK parameters were based on literature values or estimated based on scan data (four time points post-injection) from nine patients. Finally, individual [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE uptake into tumors and kidneys was predicted based on individual [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE scan data using Bayesian estimates. Predictions were evaluated compared to observed data using a relative prediction error (RPE) for both area under the curve (AUC) and absorbed dose. Lastly, to assess the predictive value of diagnostic imaging to predict therapeutic exposure, individual prediction RPEs (using Bayesian estimation) were compared to those from population predictions (using the population model).

RESULTS

Population uptake rate parameters for spleen, kidney and tumors differed by a 0.29-fold (15% relative standard error (RSE)), 0.49-fold (15% RSE) and 1.43-fold (14% RSE), respectively, for [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE compared to [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE. Model predictions adequately described observed data in kidney and tumors for both peptides (based on visual inspection of goodness-of-fit plots). Individual predictions of tumor uptake were better (RPE AUC -40 to 28%) compared to kidney predictions (RPE AUC -53 to 41%). Absorbed dose predictions were less predictive for both tumor and kidneys (RPE tumor and kidney -51 to 44% and -58 to 82%, respectively). For most patients, [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE tumor accumulation predictions based on individual PK parameters estimated from diagnostic imaging outperformed predictions based on population parameters.

CONCLUSION

Our semi-physiological PK model indicated clear differences in PK parameters for [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE and [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. Diagnostic images provided additional information to individually predict [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE tumor uptake compared to using a population approach. In addition, individual predictions indicated that many aspects, apart from PK differences, play a part in predicting [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE distribution.

The effect of long-acting somatostatin analogues on the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE

PURPOSE

According to IAEA/EANM/SNMMI guidelines, long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSAs) should be discontinued 4-6 weeks prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to prevent somatostatin receptor saturation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of continued use of long-acting SSAs during PRRT on the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE on SPECT/CT.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours who were treated with PRRT receiving 7.4 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) control (LA-SSA stopped > 6 weeks prior to PRRT), or continued treatment with (2) long-acting octreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT, or (3) long-acting lanreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT. The uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was quantified in healthy tissues (spleen, liver, kidneys, bone marrow) and tumour lesions on SPECT/CT performed 24 h after PRRT. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine differences in uptake between the long-acting octreotide and long-acting lanreotide groups compared to the control group.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with 135 cycles of PRRT were included: 28 with lanreotide, 50 with octreotide, and 57 cycles without LA-SSAs. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was significantly decreased in liver parenchyma in patients with lanreotide (p < 0.001) and in the spleen in patients with either octreotide or lanreotide (both p < 0.001). No differences were observed for uptake in kidneys, bone marrow, and blood pool. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumours was the same in patients with lanreotide compared to the control (p = 0.862) and in patients with octreotide compared to the control (p = 0.201), independent of tumour location.

CONCLUSION

Long-acting octreotide and lanreotide do not interfere with the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumour lesions 24 h post-injection. Uptake in healthy liver parenchyma significantly decreases after lanreotide administration prior to PRRT, while uptake in healthy spleen tissue significantly decreases with both octreotide and lanreotide administration.

Somatostatin receptor saturation after administration of high peptide amounts of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE: when enough is enough

BACKGROUND

Receptor saturation during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) could result in altered [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE uptake in tumors and organs. Therefore, receptor expression status and effects of different (unlabeled) administered peptide amounts during PRRT need to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess potential receptor saturation during PRRT by comparing organ and tumor uptake after administration of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE with low, standard and high administered peptide amounts in patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

METHODS

Data of NET patients that received 7.4 GBq 177-Lutetium labeled to a low or high amount of HA-DOTATATE were retrospectively included. From included patients other PRRT cycles, containing standard administered peptide amounts, were included for intra-patient comparison. Uptake quantification was performed for spleen, liver, kidney, bone marrow, blood pool and tumor lesions on post-treatment SPECT/CT scans. A paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to determine uptake differences between two adjacent cycles for each patient.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients received [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE with a high administered peptide amount (mean 346 µg vs 178 µg standard peptide amount). Low peptide amounts were administered to fifteen patients (mean 109 µg vs 202 µg standard peptide amount). High administered peptide amount resulted in significantly lower [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE uptake in the spleen (p = 0.00012), kidney (p = 0.013) and tumor lesions (p < 0.0001) versus standard peptide amounts. For low administered peptide amount, uptake was increased in the spleen (p = 0.015), while tumor uptake was significantly reduced (p = 0.015) compared to uptake after administration of standard peptide amounts.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirmed a peptide amount-dependent organ and tumor accumulation for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE, with receptor saturation in spleen for high and standard peptide amounts, while tumor and kidney receptor saturation occur only with high administered peptide amounts. A high peptide amount (~ 350 µg) is not recommended for standard-dose PRRT and standard amounts (~ 200 µg) seem more suitable to achieve optimal tumor accumulation with limited organ uptake.

Post-PRRT scans: which scans to make and what to look for

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of SPECT/CT (imaging of uptake in tumor lesions and additional findings) and the additional value of planar imaging in order to simplify clinical imaging protocols and decrease patients burden.

Materials and methods

One hundred consecutive patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) treated with PRRT were included. Post-therapy imaging was performed 24 h after each PRRT cycle by both whole-body planar imaging and abdominal- and thoracic SPECT/CT. All images were evaluated for (1) the presence of new lesions, (2) discordant lesions between the two acquisitions (planar or SPECT), (3) location of lesions on SPECT (abdominal, thoracic, or both), and (4) additional findings on non-contrast enhanced CT imaging.

Results

In total 368 PRRT cycles including post-therapy imaging were performed in 100 patients. 45 patients had abdominal disease only, whilst in 55 patients the disease was observed on both abdominal and thoracic SPECT. 16 patients had known bone lesions that were visible only on planar imaging as these were out of range of the SPECT/CT. During PRRT, one patient developed multiple new bone metastases after the second cycle of PRRT, which were visible on both planar and SPECT/CT images. In 11 patients additional findings were found on CT images, the most common and relevant being bowel obstruction, pleural effusion, and ascites. Patients who developed ascites during PRRT appeared to do extremely poor; a post-hoc analysis showed that overall survival was 13.2 months in patients that showed ascites during PRRT at any moment and 37.9 months in patients without ascites (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

From a clinical point of view, thoracoabdominal SPECT/CT imaging is the preferred method for post-PRRT imaging; planar imaging had no added value over SPECT/CT in this cohort. In patients with abdominal disease only on baseline imaging, SPECT/CT of the abdomen only might be sufficient for imaging during the PRRT course. All accompanying CT images should be reviewed for additional findings, especially ascites, which is suggested to be a poor prognostic factor in patients receiving PRRT.