Association of continuous positive airway pressure with F2-isoprostanes in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis

Obstructive sleep apnoea heterogeneity and cardiovascular disease

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), characterized by recurrent periods of upper airway obstruction and intermittent hypoxaemia, is prevalent in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), and is therefore important to consider in the prevention and management of CVD. Observational studies indicate that OSA is a risk factor for incident hypertension, poorly controlled blood pressure, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death and all-cause death. However, clinical trials have not provided consistent evidence that treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improves cardiovascular outcomes. These overall null findings might be explained by limitations in trial design and low levels of adherence to CPAP. Studies have also been limited by the failure to consider OSA as a heterogeneous disorder that consists of multiple subtypes resulting from variable contributions from anatomical, physiological, inflammatory and obesity-related risk factors, and resulting in different physiological disturbances. Novel markers of sleep apnoea-associated hypoxic burden and cardiac autonomic response have emerged as predictors of OSA-related susceptibility to adverse health outcomes and treatment response. In this Review, we summarize our understanding of the shared risk factors and causal links between OSA and CVD and emerging knowledge on the heterogeneity of OSA. We discuss the varied mechanistic pathways that result in CVD that also vary across subgroups of OSA, as well as the potential role of new biomarkers for CVD risk stratification.

Common and Novel Markers for Measuring Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Ex Vivo in Research and Clinical Practice-Which to Use Regarding Disease Outcomes?

Many chronic conditions such as cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type-2 diabetes, obesity, peripheral/coronary artery disease and auto-immune diseases are associated with low-grade inflammation. Closely related to inflammation is oxidative stress (OS), which can be either causal or secondary to inflammation. While a low level of OS is physiological, chronically increased OS is deleterious. Therefore, valid biomarkers of these signalling pathways may enable detection and following progression of OS/inflammation as well as to evaluate treatment efficacy. Such biomarkers should be stable and obtainable through non-invasive methods and their determination should be affordable and easy. The most frequently used inflammatory markers include acute-phase proteins, essentially CRP, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen and procalcitonin, and cytokines, predominantly TNFα, interleukins 1β, 6, 8, 10 and 12 and their receptors and IFNγ. Some cytokines appear to be disease-specific. Conversely, OS-being ubiquitous-and its biomarkers appear less disease or tissue-specific. These include lipid peroxidation products, e.g., F2-isoprostanes and malondialdehyde, DNA breakdown products (e.g., 8-OH-dG), protein adducts (e.g., carbonylated proteins), or antioxidant status. More novel markers include also -omics related ones, as well as non-invasive, questionnaire-based measures, such as the dietary inflammatory-index (DII), but their link to biological responses may be variable. Nevertheless, many of these markers have been clearly related to a number of diseases. However, their use in clinical practice is often limited, due to lacking analytical or clinical validation, or technical challenges. In this review, we strive to highlight frequently employed and useful markers of inflammation-related OS, including novel promising markers.