Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions

Establishing and evaluating the gradient of item naming difficulty in post-stroke aphasia and semantic dementia

Anomia is a common consequence following brain damage and a central symptom in semantic dementia (SD) and post-stroke aphasia (PSA), for instance. Picture naming tests are often used in clinical assessments and experience suggests that items vary systematically in their difficulty. Despite clinical intuitions and theoretical accounts, however, the existence and determinants of such a naming difficulty gradient remain to be empirically established and evaluated. Seizing the unique opportunity of two large-scale datasets of semantic dementia and post-stroke aphasia patients assessed with the same picture naming test, we applied an Item Response Theory (IRT) approach and we (a) established that an item naming difficulty gradient exists, which (b) partly differs between patient groups, and is (c) related in part to a limited number of psycholinguistic properties - frequency and familiarity for SD, frequency and word length for PSA. Our findings offer exciting future avenues for new, adaptive, time-efficient, and patient-tailored approaches to naming assessment and therapy.

Evaluation of covariate effects in item response theory models

Item response theory (IRT) models are usually the best way to analyze composite or rating scale data. Standard methods to evaluate covariate or treatment effects in IRT models do not allow to identify item-specific effects. Finding subgroups of patients who respond differently to certain items could be very important when designing inclusion or exclusion criteria for clinical trials, and aid in understanding different treatment responses in varying disease manifestations. We present a new method to investigate item-specific effects in IRT models, which is based on inspection of residuals. The method was investigated in a simulation exercise with a model for the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. We also provide a detailed discussion as a guidance on how to build a robust covariate IRT model.

Psychometric evidence of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II): an item response theory analysis in university students from Chile

BACKGROUND

Experiential avoidance (EA) is a psychological mechanism associated with several mental health disorders and is regarded as a relevant target by third-generation cognitive behavioral therapies. It has been mainly assessed through self-report questionnaires, and the AAQ-II is the most used tool. Its psychometric evidence has been mostly tested through the classical test theory (CTT) and very scarcely assessed through Item Response Theory (IRT).

METHODS

We used the Graded Response Model to examine its psychometric properties in Spanish-speaking university students (n = 1503; women = 995 (66.2%), mean age = 19.29, SD = 2.45). We tested whether the empirical data fit the model's predictions and estimated the dispersion of persons and items along the experiential avoidance continuum. Moreover, we examined category probability curves to identify the response probability of each answer. Likewise, an item-person map was made where the measurement of persons and items, both on the same scale and along the experiential avoidance continuum, could be observed jointly. Finally, we tested the gender invariance of the scale.

RESULTS

We found that the values of the individuals and the items were in the established range to be considered an adequate measure of EA. Additionally, we observed high discrimination indices for all items. The current version with seven answer options could not be optimal and should be tested in future studies. Finally, we found evidence of differential functioning by gender in one of the seven items of the instrument.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the AAQ-II is a suitable tool for measuring EA and accurately classifying and differentiating EA levels in university students.

DIF Analysis with Unknown Groups and Anchor Items

Ensuring fairness in instruments like survey questionnaires or educational tests is crucial. One way to address this is by a Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis, which examines if different subgroups respond differently to a particular item, controlling for their overall latent construct level. DIF analysis is typically conducted to assess measurement invariance at the item level. Traditional DIF analysis methods require knowing the comparison groups (reference and focal groups) and anchor items (a subset of DIF-free items). Such prior knowledge may not always be available, and psychometric methods have been proposed for DIF analysis when one piece of information is unknown. More specifically, when the comparison groups are unknown while anchor items are known, latent DIF analysis methods have been proposed that estimate the unknown groups by latent classes. When anchor items are unknown while comparison groups are known, methods have also been proposed, typically under a sparsity assumption - the number of DIF items is not too large. However, DIF analysis when both pieces of information are unknown has not received much attention. This paper proposes a general statistical framework under this setting. In the proposed framework, we model the unknown groups by latent classes and introduce item-specific DIF parameters to capture the DIF effects. Assuming the number of DIF items is relatively small, an L 1 -regularised estimator is proposed to simultaneously identify the latent classes and the DIF items. A computationally efficient Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm is developed to solve the non-smooth optimisation problem for the regularised estimator. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated by simulation studies and an application to item response data from a real-world educational test.

Accuracy of mixture item response theory models for identifying sample heterogeneity in patient-reported outcomes: a simulation study

PURPOSE

Mixture item response theory (MixIRT) models can be used to uncover heterogeneity in responses to items that comprise patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This is accomplished by identifying relatively homogenous latent subgroups in heterogeneous populations. Misspecification of the number of latent subgroups may affect model accuracy. This study evaluated the impact of specifying too many latent subgroups on the accuracy of MixIRT models.

METHODS

Monte Carlo methods were used to assess MixIRT accuracy. Simulation conditions included number of items and latent classes, class size ratio, sample size, number of non-invariant items, and magnitude of between-class difference in item parameters. Bias and mean square error in item parameters and accuracy of latent class recovery were assessed.

RESULTS

When the number of latent classes was correctly specified, the average bias and MSE in model parameters decreased as the number of items and latent classes increased, but specification of too many latent classes resulted in modest decrease (i.e., < 10%) in the accuracy of latent class recovery.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of MixIRT model is largely influenced by the overspecification of the number of latent classes. Appropriate choice of goodness-of-fit measures, study design considerations, and a priori contextual understanding of the degree of sample heterogeneity can guide model selection.

Validation of the Moral Reasoning Questionnaire against Rasch Measurement Theory

To support teachers in facilitating students’ moral reasoning development as specified within the Singapore Ministry of Education Character and Citizenship Education curriculum, the Moral Reasoning Questionnaire (MRQ) was developed and underwent preliminary validation. Based upon expert reviews, cognitive interviews and a classical test theory-based factor analytic approach, the development and preliminary validation found evidence (i.e., content appropriateness, response processes and internal structure) to support the validity and reliability of the MRQ. This study aims to extend the validation by examining the purported MRQ items and scale at a deeper level on the Rasch Measurement Theory, given that it is the only model that presents appropriate properties of interval measurement on a log-linear scale. The Rasch analysis found anomalies including differential item functioning and disordered thresholds in the initial set of items. Upon remediation and a second Rasch analysis, the MRQ responses were consistent with that expressed by the Rasch model (i.e., an item with an endorsability higher than what a respondent would tend to endorse would have a lower probability of being endorsed than an item exhibiting an endorsability below what that respondent would tend to endorse) and hence, there was sufficient evidence to support measurement invariance, and that MRQ scores could be concluded to characterise persons invariantly across a continuum.

A View of the Development of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures, their Clinical Integration, Electronification, and Potential Impact on Rehabilitation Service Delivery

Recognition of the importance of a patient's perception of their status and experience has become central to medical care and its evaluation. This recognition has led to a growing reliance on the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Nevertheless, while awareness of PROMs and acceptance of their utility has increased markedly, few of us have a good insight into their development; their utility relative to clinician-rated and performance measures such as the FIM and 6-Minute Walk Test or how their "electronification" and incorporation into electronic health records (EHRs) may improve the individualization, value, and quality of medical care. In all, the goal of this commentary is to provide some insight into historical factors and technology developments that we believe have shaped modern clinical PROMs as they relate to medicine in general and to rehabilitation in particular. In addition, we speculate that while the growth of PROM use may have been triggered by an increased emphasis on the centrality of the patient in their care, future uptake will be shaped by their embedding in EHRs and use to improve clinical decision support though their integration with other sources of clinical and sociodemographic data.

Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Public Health

Patient-reported outcomes are recognized as essential for the evaluation of medical and public health interventions. Over the last 50 years, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) research has grown exponentially from 0 to more than 17,000 papers published annually. We provide an overview of generic HRQoL measures used widely in epidemiological studies, health services research, population studies, and randomized clinical trials [e.g., Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS^®)-29]. In addition, we review methods used for economic analysis and calculation of the quality-adjusted life year (QALY). These include the EQ-5D, the Health Utilities Index (HUI), the self-administered Quality of Well-being Scale (QWB-SA), and the Health and Activities Limitation Index (HALex). Furthermore, we consider hybrid measures such as the SF-6D and the PROMIS-Preference (PROPr). The plethora of HRQoL measures has impeded cumulative science because incomparable measures have been used in different studies. Linking among different measures and consensus on standard HRQoL measurement should now be prioritized. In addition, enabling widespread access to common measures is necessary to accelerate future progress. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health, Volume 43 is April 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Not all DIF is shaped similarly

In response to the target article by Teresi et al. (2021), we explain why the article is useful and we also present a different approach. An alternative category of differential item functioning (DIF) is presented with a corresponding way of modeling DIF, based on random person and random item effects and explanatory covariates.

Examination of the measurement equivalence of the Functional Assessment in Acute Care MCAT (FAMCAT) mobility item bank using differential item functioning analyses

OBJECTIVE

To assess differential item functioning (DIF) in an item pool measuring the mobility of hospitalized patients across educational, age, and gender groups.

DESIGN

Measurement evaluation cohort study. Content experts generated DIF hypotheses to guide the interpretation. The graded response item response theory (IRT) model was used. Primary DIF tests were Wald statistics; sensitivity analyses were conducted using the IRT ordinal logistic regression procedure. Magnitude and impact were evaluated by examining group differences in expected item and scale score functions.

SETTING

Hospital-based rehabilitation PARTICIPANTS: 2216 hospitalized patients MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 111 self-reported mobility items RESULTS: Two linking items among those used to set the metric across forms evidenced DIF for gender and age: 'difficulty climbing stairs step-over-step without a handrail (alternating feet)' and 'difficulty climbing 3 to 5 steps without a handrail'. Conditional on the mobility state, the items were more difficult for women and older people (aged 65 and over). An additional 18 items were identified with DIF. Items with both high DIF magnitude and hypotheses related to age were difficulty: 'crossing road at a 4-lane traffic light with curbs'; 'jumping/landing on one leg'; 'strenuous activities'; 'descending 3-5 steps with no handrail'. Although DIF of higher magnitude was observed for several items, the scale-level impact was relatively small and the exposure rate for the most problematic items was low (0.35, 0.27 and 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study to evaluate measurement equivalence of the hospital-based rehabilitation mobility item bank. Although 20 items evidenced high magnitude DIF, five related to stairs, the scale-level impact was minimal; however, it is recommended that such items be avoided in the development of short-form measures. No items with salient DIF were removed from calibrations, supporting the use of the item bank across groups differing in education, age, and gender. The bank may thus be useful to assist clinical assessment and decision-making regarding risk for specific mobility restrictions at discharge as well as identifying mobility-related functions targeted for post- discharge interventions. Additionally, with the goal of avoiding long and burdensome assessments for patients and clinical staff; these results could be informative for those using the item bank to construct short forms.