Site selection for waste vegetable oil and waste battery collection boxes: a GIS-based hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach

Literature analysis of the location selection studies related to the waste facilities within MCDM approaches

The increase in waste and related environmental problems is one of the major problems compromising health and environmental quality in urban and rural areas. There are a number of policies that can be implemented to reduce waste, but since it cannot be completely eliminated, recycling and disposal facilities for waste will always be required. Researchers and professionals are currently grappling with the issue of where to locate waste facilities. In the light of all this information, a literature review is presented so that researchers can easily access and systematically review previous studies on the waste facility location selection problem. At this point, in order to reduce the reviewed studies to a reasonable level and to conduct a more organized research, this literature research has conducted within the framework of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches, which is one of the most applied methods in location selection problems. The subsequent strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis delves into the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the field, offering a concise guide for future research in waste facility location selection problem. The SWOT analysis highlights the strengths of global environmental awareness and versatile MCDM approaches, while addressing weaknesses in emerging technology integration and potential biases. Opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and integration of sustainability metrics provide strategic pathways, but threats such as regulatory changes and limited funding underscore challenges. This analysis serves as a concise guide for future research in waste facility location selection.

MAGDM approach using the hyperbolic sine similarity measure of confidence neutrosophic number credibility sets in a fuzzy credibility multi-valued circumstance

Group decision-making is that individuals collectively make a choice from a set of alternatives. Then, in complex decision-making problems, the decision-making process is no longer subject to a single individual, but group decision-making. Hence, the decision reliability and credibility of the collective evaluation information become more critical. However, current decision-making methods lack the confidence level and credibility measure of group evaluation information. To ensure the confidence level and credibility measure of small-scale group decision-making problems, the aim of this paper is to propose a Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making (MAGDM) approach using a hyperbolic sine similarity measure between Confidence Neutrosophic Number Credibility Sets (CNNCSs) in the circumstance of Fuzzy Credibility Multi-Valued Sets (FCMVSs). To achieve this aim, this paper contains the following works. First, we present FCMVS to represent the mixed information of fuzzy sequences and credibility degree sequences with different and/or identical fuzzy values. Second, according to the normal distribution and confidence level of fuzzy values and credibility degrees in FCMVS, FCMVS is transformed into CNNCS to avoid the operational issue between different fuzzy sequence lengths in FCMVSs and to ensure the confidence neutrosophic numbers/confidence intervals of fuzzy values and credibility degrees. Third, a hyperbolic sine similarity measure of CNNCSs is established in the circumstance of FCMVSs. Fourth, a MAGDM approach is developed based on the weighted hyperbolic sine similarity measure in the circumstance of FCMVSs. Fifth, the proposed MAGDM approach is applied to an actual example of the equipment supplier choice problem to illustrate the efficiency and rationality of the proposed MAGDM approach in a FCMVS circumstance. In general, this study reveals new contributions in the representation, transformation method, and similarity measure of small-scale group assessment information, as well as the proposed MAGDM method subject to the normal distribution and confidence levels in small-scale MAGDM scenarios.

Designing a fuzzy decision support framework for assessing solid waste management in the South European region

The environmental planning of cities and rural regions is associated with monitoring the performance of several services, including solid waste management. This study proposes a new framework for the comparative assessment of the performance of integrated municipal solid waste management. The framework includes the fuzzy MACBETH multi-criteria decision-making model used to investigate the uncertainties and inefficiencies associated with solid waste management systems. The model consists of all major stages in solid waste management and its environmental impact. The applicability of the model was examined in the South European region. According to the global fuzzy values of the criteria weights, the most influential reported criteria were GHG emission (0.113,0.157,0.202), the waste generation growth rate (0.034,0.063,0.141), and waste generation (0.034,0.054,0.127). The other results indicated that Italy (47.26) and France (42.67) had shown a better performance, only to be followed by Spain (37.68), whereas Greece (15.77) and Portugal (12.85) had received the lowest score. In the context of promoting the circular economy in Europe, having a higher recycling rate and less landfilling is beneficial for Greece and Portugal. In addition to this, all these countries should make efforts on decoupling the waste generation-GDP correlation. Furthermore, the applicability of the model depends on an appropriate scale and criteria. The model can be replicated to other developed societies with a few modifications. However, it is necessary to modify the criteria for assessing developing societies based on local conditions.

Clean energy selection for sustainable development by using entropy-based decision model with hesitant fuzzy information

Smart cities development is an ambitious project launched in India in 2015 with around 14 billion USD. Smart city mission program primarily aimed at reducing the carbon footprint and encouraging green and sustainable practices. Under this context, clean energy usage for demand fulfillment became the prime focus. India's geographic location gifts the nation with diverse clean energy sources (CES). Owing to the multiple sustainable criteria that are both conflicting and correlated, there is an urge for a multi-criteria decision approach. Previously, literatures on CES selection have not been able to grab the hesitation properly and handle uncertainty effectively. Since the human mind is dynamic, hesitation is an integral part of choice making. Hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) is a generic set that captures hesitation better. Driven by these claims, in this work, a new framework for CES selection is developed. Attitude-driven entropy measure is proposed for criteria weight assessment, and a mathematical model is formulated for ranking CESs. Together, these methods constitute a decision framework that (i) considers the attitude of experts and captures hesitation during rating process and (ii) acquires partial personal choices from experts before ranking CESs. To testify the framework, a case study from a smart city within Tamil Nadu (a state in India) is explained. Sensitivity analysis reveals the robustness of the framework, and comparison with other works showcases the novel innovations of the proposal.

Assessment of occupational health and safety risks in a Turkish public hospital using a two-stage hesitant fuzzy linguistic approach

Occupational health and safety (OHS) risk assessment studies have gained importance recently as a result of increasing occupational accidents and occupational diseases. The health sector has a greater risk than many sectors for occupational accidents and occupational diseases. Although the health sector is one of the priority sectors in Turkey, OHS practices have not been fully implemented in this field. For this reason, this study adopts a two-stage approach to assess the OHS risks in the health sector by combining the Fine-Kinney and multi-criteria hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (HFLTS) methods. The proposed method was applied to the OHS risks in the operating room of a public hospital in Turkey. As a solution to the problem, first, the potential hazards and related risks in the operating room were determined by the experts. In this first stage, 44 hazards were determined from the opinions of experts and records of past incidents. Parameter weights were then determined using the multi-criteria HFLTS method. The multi-criteria HFLTS method was used to evaluate seven hazards to be categorized as substantial-risk or higher according to the Fine-Kinney method, taking into account parameter weights. Sensitivity analysis was then carried out. Finally, actions were taken to mitigate the risks.

Nominal Land Valuation with Best-Worst Method Using Geographic Information System: A Case of Atakum, Samsun

Land valuation can be used in various areas, such as taxation, property acquisition, rental, expropriation, urban regeneration, and land readjustment. As a result, determining the value of land accurately by considering multiple criteria to eliminate the impact of subjectivity on the value of land is important. Nominal valuation is a statistical method for determining land values based on multiple criteria. In nominal valuation, criteria can be managed, analyzed, and integrated using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). This study produced a land value map using a nominal valuation method based on multiple criteria. The main criteria and sub-criteria have been determined according to the previous studies. Criteria weights were determined using the Best-Worst Method (BWM), which is one of the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods. A nominal land value map of the Atakum district of Samsun was produced by integrating criteria maps using GIS and compared with a value map based on current land sales.

Pandemic hospital site selection: a GIS-based MCDM approach employing Pythagorean fuzzy sets

COVID-19 poses many challenges for hospitals around the world. Each country attempts to solve the problems in its hospitals using different methods. In Turkey, two pandemic hospitals were built in İstanbul, the most crowded province. In addition, some hospitals were designated as pandemic hospitals. This study focuses on the methods used for site selection for a pandemic hospital in Atakum, a district of Samsun City, Turkey. As a solution to the problem, initially, spatial analysis was performed using GIS to produce maps based on seven criteria obtained from the insight of an expert team. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) augmented by interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (PFNs) was then used to determine weights for the criteria. Distance to transportation network was the most important criterion influencing the selection process and the least significant one was the distance to fire stations. Based on the criteria weights, and five rules specified by the expert team, 13 suitable locations for a pandemic hospital were determined using GIS. The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method was used to determine the final ranking of 13 alternative locations (A1-A13). A10 was identified as the most appropriate site and A11 as the least appropriate site for a pandemic hospital. Finally, sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate how changes in weight values of the criteria affect the ranking of the alternatives.

Research on emergency treatment technology for water pollution accidents where the pollutants are not included in the emergency database

At present, emergency treatment methods are selected based on case or technical database, and it is limited to chemicals in pollution accidents covered by the database. Based on the existing emergency treatment technical database, this paper adds a new chemical characteristics database from the physicochemical properties of chemicals such as toxicity and solubility. Combining the weight of characteristic indexes calculated by the Criteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation method combined with the Entropy Weight (CRITIC-EW) method and Manhattan distance, a model is constructed to preliminarily select alternative technologies for a target pollutant. Then, Decision-Makers (DMs) can evaluate alternative technologies using the compound language combined comparative language based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (HFLTS) and single language. And alternative technologies are ranked by applying Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The closest alternative technology is the most suitable. Taking Bisphenol A (BPA) pollution accident as an example, this method is verified. By analyzing physicochemical properties, forms, and uses between similar chemicals and BPA, as well as applicability of alternative technologies, the emergency treatment method proposed in this study is proved feasible.

The Development of Decarbonisation Strategies: A Three-Step Methodology for the Suitable Analysis of Current EVCS Locations Applied to Istanbul, Turkey

One of the solutions to reduce environmental emissions is related to the deployment of electric vehicles (EVs) with sustainable energy. In order to be able to increase the number of electric vehicles in circulation, it is important to implement optimal planning and design of the infrastructure, with particular reference to areas equipped with charging stations. The suitable analysis of the location of current electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs) is the central theme of this document. The research focused on the actual location of the charging stations of five major EVCS companies in the province by selecting Istanbul as the study area. The study was conducted through a three-step approach and specifically (i) the application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method for creating the weights of the 6 main and 18 secondary criteria that influence the location of EVCSs; (ii) a geospatial analysis using GIS considering each criterion and developing the suitability map for the locations of EVCSs, and (iii) application of the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to evaluate the location performance of current EVCSs. The results show that the ratio between the most suitable and unsuitable areas for the location of EVCSs in Istanbul and the study area is about 5% and 4%, respectively. The results achieved means of improving sustainable urban planning and laying the basis for an assessment of other areas where EVCSs could be placed.