Nerve transfers for adult traumatic brachial plexus palsy (brachial plexus nerve transfer)

[Anatomical cartography of the radial nerve at the elbow level for intraradial nerve transfers for finger extension reconstruction in spastic upper limb - A cadaveric study]

INTRODUCTION

Upper limb spasticity is a surgical challenge, both in diminishing agonists spasticity and reconstructing antagonist function. Brachioradialis (BR) is often involved in elbow flexors spasticity. Finger extension is often impaired in spastic patients. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of BR motor branch to posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) during BR selective neurectomies, and to describe fascicles topography inside the radial nerve to facilitate PIN dissection.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Ten upper limbs from 10 fresh frozen anatomical specimens were dissected. Motor branches to the BR, wrist extensors, supinator, PIN and radial sensory branch were identified. BR to PIN transfer was realized and its feasibility was studies (donor length, tensionless suture).

RESULTS

BR to PIN transfer was achievable in 9 out of 10 cases. The position of the sensory branch of the radial nerve was inferior or medial in all cases. The position of the PIN was lateral in 90% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

BR to PIN nerve transfer is achievable in most cases (90%). The lateral topography of the PIN and the inferomedial topography of the sensory branch in most cases allows for an easier intraoperative finding of the PIN when stimulation is not possible.

LEVEL

IV, feasibility study.

Positive effect of ulnar nerve fascicle transfer to musculocutaneous nerve seeded with allogeneic adipose tissue derived stem cells on nerve regeneration for repairing upper brachial plexus injury in a rat model: A preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Traumatic peripheral nerve injury, with an annual incidence reported to be approximately 13-23 per 100,000 people, is a serious clinical condition that can often lead to significant functional impairment and permanent disability. Although nerve transfer has become increasingly popular in the treatment of brachial plexus injuries, satisfactory results cannot be obtained even with total nerve root transfer, especially after serious injuries. To overcome this problem, we hypothesize that the application of stem cells in conjunction with nerve transfer procedures may be a viable alternative to more aggressive treatments that do not result in adequate improvement. Similarly, some preliminary studies have shown that adipose stem cells combined with acellular nerve allograft provide promising results in the repair of brachial plexus injury. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of combining adipose-derived stem cells with nerve transfer procedure in a rat brachial plexus injury model.

METHODS

Twenty female Wistar rats weighing 300-350 g and aged 8-10 weeks were randomly divided into two groups: a nerve transfer group (NT group) and a nerve transfer combined adipose stem cell group (NT and ASC group). The upper brachial plexus injury model was established by gently avulsing the C5-C6 roots from the spinal cord with microforceps. A nerve transfer from the ulnar nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin procedure) was performed with or without seeded allogeneic adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells at a rate of 2 × 106 cells were injected locally to the surface of the nerve transfer area with a 23-gauge needle. Immunohistochemistry (S100 and PGP 9.5 antibodies) and electrophysiological data were used to evaluate the effect of nerve repair 12 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean latency was significantly longer in the NT group (2.0 ± 0.0 ms, 95% CI: 1.96-2.06) than in the NT and ASC group (1.7 ± 0.0 ms, 95% CI: 1.7-1.7) (p < .001). The mean peak value was higher in the NT group (1.7 ± 0.0 mV, 95% CI: 1.7-1.7) than in the NT and ASC group (1.7 ± 0.3 mV, 95% CI: 1.6-1.9) with no significant difference (p = .61). Although S100 and PGP 9.5 positive areas were observed in higher amounts in the NT and ASC group compared to the NT group, the differences were not statistically significant (p = .26 and .08, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study conducted on rats provides preliminary evidence that adipose-derived stem cells may have a positive effect on nerve transfer for the treatment of brachial plexus injury. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings.

Anatomical considerations for nerve transfer in axillary nerve injury

This study investigated the anatomical details of the axillary and radial nerves in 50 upper limbs from 29 adult formalin-embalmed cadavers, and ten fresh upper limbs. The focus was on understanding the course, division, and ramifications of these nerves to improve treatment of shoulder dysfunction caused by axillary nerve damage. The axillary nerve divided anteriorly and posteriorly before passing the quadrangular space in all specimens, with specific distances to the first ramifications. It was found that the deltoid muscle's clavicular and acromial parts were always innervated by the anterior division of the axillary nerve, whereas the spinous part was variably innervated. The longest and thickest branches of the radial nerve to the triceps muscles were identified, with no statistically significant differences in fiber numbers among triceps branches. The study concludes that nerve transfer to the anterior division of the axillary nerve can restore the deltoid muscle in about 86% of shoulders, and the teres minor muscle can be restored by nerve transfer to the posterior division. The medial head branch and long head branch of radial nerve were identified as the best donor options.

Factors Associated with Poorer Outcomes from Triceps Motor Branch to Anterior Axillary Nerve Transfer: A Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

We sought to identify predictors of failed triceps motor branch transfer to the anterior division of the axillary nerve (AN) for shoulder abduction reconstruction after a brachial plexus injury (BPI).

METHODS

A case-control study of adult AN or brachial plexus patients treated with a triceps motor branch transfer to the anterior division of the AN with a minimum 18 months of follow-up was performed. The failure group (case group) was defined as modified British Medical Research Council muscle scale (mBMRC) postoperative deltoid grade ≤2 and was compared to the successful outcome group (control group), defined as mBMRC postoperative deltoid grade ≥3. Clinical variables, injury mechanism, time from injury to surgery, root avulsion status, electrodiagnostic studies, rotator cuff injuries, scapula fracture, Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand scores, and preoperative triceps strength were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with isolated AN injuries and those with BPI.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria, of whom 23 regained ≥M3 deltoid muscle strength and 52° ± 69° of shoulder abduction (successful outcome group) and 46 regained ≤M2 deltoid muscle strength and 27° ± 30° of shoulder abduction (failure group). Preoperative triceps weakness (M ≤4) was significantly more common in the failure group (63% vs. 30%, P = 0.032); preoperative triceps muscle fibrillations were significantly more common in the failure group (61% vs. 30%, P = 0.02). Isolated AN injuries presented better preoperative motion and postoperative outcomes results compared to BPI.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of triceps motor branch associated with fibrillations or weakness resulted in statistically poorer outcomes compared to the use of a normal triceps motor branch in the restoration of anterior AN function after nerve transfer.

Interdisciplinary perspectives of rehabilitation in adult brachial plexus palsies

The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the interdisciplinary approach could have a positive result on the rehabilitation program in brachial plexus paralysis in adults. The prevalence of brachial plexus injuries is currently increasing worldwide, mainly due to the growing number of car accidents, extreme sports or work-related injuries. In this study we chose to present an analysis of one complex surgical case of brachial plexus paralysis, with clinical and electrophysiological investigations. (1) Background: Current reconstructive surgical nerve transfer procedures aim to rehabilitate elbow flexion in such cases. Surgical strategies are based not only on clinical evaluation or investigations by magnetic resonance imaging but also on classical electrophysiological methods, such as electromyography (EMG). (2) Methods: Along with the other types of therapies already established, in the case of this pathology, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is also used, which provides valuable information about cortical reorganization models concomitant with surgical procedures for nerve reconstruction in the last 3 decades. (3) Results: The study shows that interdisciplinary leads to a faster and more complex rehabilitation of the patient with brachial plexus paralysis and that electrophysiological signals could predict constant motor benefits when associated with rehabilitation programs. Keywords: brachial plexus; electromyography; transcranial magnetic stimulation; neuroplasticity;

Localization of Brachial Plexopathies Using a Novel Diagnostic Program

Background: Assessing the extent and specific location of brachial plexus injuries can be difficult given the variety of mechanisms of injury and anatomic complexity of the plexus. We developed a program to accurately assess the location of a patient's neurologic injury based on electromyographic data. Purpose: We sought to test our hypothesis that the location of traumatic brachial plexopathies could be accurately assessed with a novel program that processed electromyogram (EMG) and mechanism of injury data. Methods: This retrospective diagnostic cohort study was carried out with a novel diagnostic algorithm developed with the Python programming language. The program accepts user input of muscles demonstrating decreased motor unit recruitment, positive sharp waves, or fibrillation potentials. The testing data set was derived from a registry of brachial plexus injuries treated at our center. The primary outcome was the percent concordance of the algorithm's diagnosis with the surgical diagnosis. Results: Ninety-five cases met the inclusion criteria. Median time from injury onset to EMG examination was 4 months; median time from EMG examination to surgery was 1.2 months. The program diagnosis matched the surgical diagnosis in 92 out of 95 (97%) of cases, including cases with multilevel injuries and additional peripheral nerve injuries. Conclusion: This program accurately localized brachial plexopathies in nearly all cases, including those involving polytrauma or complex patterns of injury. This algorithm may be valuable as an aid to complete electrodiagnostic examinations, a diagnostic adjunct when planning treatment of severe plexus palsies, or an educational tool.

Roles of preoperative and early postoperative electrodiagnosis in brachial plexus injury patients undergoing nerve transfer operations: retrospective feasibility study

Objective

The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to assess the feasibility of electrodiagnostic parameters, perioperatively, and to discover optimal values as prognostic factors for patients with brachial plexus injury undergoing nerve transfer operations.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 11 patients who underwent nerve transfer surgery. The patients underwent perioperative electrodiagnosis (EDX) before and approximately 6 months after surgery. We evaluated the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) ratio, motor unit recruitment, and their interval changes. To evaluate motor strength, we used the Medical Research Council (MRC) grade, 6 and 12 months after surgery. We evaluated the relationships between improved CMAP ratio, and motor unit recruitment and MRC grade changes 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

All parameters increased significantly after surgery. The CMAP ratio improvement 6 months after surgery correlated with the MRC grade change from baseline to 12 months, with a correlation coefficient of 0.813.

Conclusion

EDX parameters improved significantly postoperatively, and the CMAP ratio improvement 6 months after surgery correlated with the clinical outcomes at 1 year. The results of perioperative EDX might help establish long-term treatment plans for patients who undergo nerve transfer surgery.

Brachial Plexus Injuries - Review of the Anatomy and the Treatment Options

Brachial plexus injuries are still challenging for every surgeon taking part in treating patients with BPI. Injuries of the brachial plexus can be divided into injuries of the upper trunk, extended upper trunk, injuries of the lower trunk and swinging hand where all of the roots are involved in this type of the injury. Brachial plexus can be divided in five anatomical sections from its roots to its terminal branches: roots, trunks, division, cords and terminal branches. Brachial plexus ends up as five terminal branches, responsible for upper limb innervation, musculocutaneous, median nerve, axillary nerve, radial and ulnar nerve. According to the findings from the preoperative investigation combined with clinically found functional deficit, the type of BPI will be confirmed and that is going to determine which surgical procedure, from variety of them (neurolysis, nerve graft, neurotization, arthrodesis, tendon transfer, free muscle transfer, bionic reconstruction) is appropriate for treating the patient.

Comparison between long and lower medial head triceps branches in dual neurotization for shoulder function restoration in upper brachial plexus palsy

PURPOSE

In upper brachial plexus injury (UBPI), restoring shoulder function is crucial. This study compares the transfer of long and lower medial heads of triceps branches to the axillary nerve to achieve proper restoration of function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted between two groups of patients with (UBPI). Group I patients (10) [mean age: 19 ± 10.6 years] were managed by transferring triceps long head branch to axillary nerve while group II patients (8) [mean age: 26 ± 9.6 years] were managed by triceps lower medial head branch transfer. The mean time from injury to surgery was 6 ± 1.3 and 5 ± 1.7 months respectively. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months with the assessment of VAS, DASH score, active range of motion (AROM) and strength of shoulder abduction and external rotation; in addition to shoulder endurance and strengths of donors. Postoperative, three-monthly, electrodiagnostic assessments were performed.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the mean VAS and DASH scores; in addition to endurance time, showed significant enhancement in both groups. Patients in both groups have accomplished a mean abduction (AROM) of 98° ± 27.9 and 97° ± 11.9 respectively. The mean external rotation (AROM) was 48° ± 18.4 and 47° ± 9.2 respectively. Furthermore, group II patients had less triceps morbidity in addition to earlier and enhanced electrophysiological recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual neurotization for shoulder function restoration in (UBPI) is capable of providing proper functional results with minimal donor morbidity. The triceps lower medial branch provides an excelling donor due to less triceps morbidity, extra length; yet, earlier and enhanced electrophysiological recovery.

Double Fascicular Nerve Transfer to Musculocutaneous Branches for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Brachial Plexus Injury

Background

Restriction of elbow flexion significantly limits upper extremity function following brachial plexus injuries. In recent years, the double fascicular nerve transfer procedure utilizing ulnar and median nerve transfer to musculocutaneous branches has shown promising functional outcomes.

Objective

To evaluate restoration of elbow flexion following a double fascicular transfer in patients with brachial plexus injuries and identify predictors of poor outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective review included 10 consecutive patients with brachial plexus injuries involving C5-C6 root avulsions who underwent the double nerve transfer procedure. The mean follow-up was 12 months and the primary outcome was assessment of elbow flexion with the use of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale.

Results

This procedure achieved elbow flexion of MRC grade M3 or higher in 50% of our cohort. Time interval from injury to surgery showed a statistically significant inverse association with functional recovery (r = -0.73, p = 0.016). Patients who had the surgery within six months of the injury, demonstrated higher MRC grades during the follow-up (p = 0.048). There was no association between elbow flexion recovery and age, body mass index (BMI), gender, hypertension, diabetes or smoking status.

Conclusions

The double fascicular transfer to musculocutaneous may be a safe and effective treatment for restoration of elbow flexion. The procedure is associated with superior functional outcomes when performed within the first six months from the injury.

Case Report: Double Oberlin Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion Following C5-C6 Avulsion Injury

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

The use of nerve transfers to restore nerve function following traumatic avulsion injuries has been described, though there is still a paucity in the literature documenting technique and long-term outcomes for these procedures. The double Oberlin nerve transfer involves transferring fascicles from the median and ulnar nerves to the musculocutaneous nerve to restore elbow flexion in patients with a C5-C6 avulsion injury. The purpose of this case report is to present our indications and technique for a double Oberlin transfer in addition to exhibiting video footage at follow-up time points documenting the incremental improvement in elbow flexion following the injury.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The patient is a 25-yr old, left-hand dominant male who presented 5 mo following a motor vehicle accident. He had 0/5 biceps muscle strength on the left with a computed tomography myelogram that demonstrated pseudomeningoceles from C2-C3 to C7-T1 with root avulsions of C5 and C6. He was subsequently indicated for a double Oberlin nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion.

CONCLUSION

In this case report, we present our technique and outcomes for a double Oberlin transfer with restoration of elbow flexion at 1-yr follow-up for a patient with traumatic brachial plexus injury. We believe that the double Oberlin transfer serves as a safe and effective method to restore elbow flexion in this patient population.

A new model for the study of neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury

The study was to introduce a new and reliable behavioral model of upper trunk of brachial plexus avulsion for the study of persistent neuropathic pain. 60 rats were divided into three groups randomly: upper trunk of brachial plexus avulsion (UTBPA) group (20), global brachial plexus avulsion (GBPA) group (20), and sham- operated group (20). The animals were tested for behavioral responsiveness before surgeries and 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, 84days after surgeries. The injured level of spinal cord was resected and the sections were processed for GFAP (astrocyte) and Iba1 (microglia) immunohistochemistry 3 weeks after surgeries. The UTBPA group developed significant signs both of mechanical and cold hypersensitivity, which matched the immunohistochemistry result, as well as the nature of avulsion was close to the clinical type of injury, the UTBPA group could be used as a suitable and effective persistent neuropathic pain model following brachial plexus injury.

Peripheral Nerve Injury: Stem Cell Therapy and Peripheral Nerve Transfer

Peripheral nerve injury can lead to great morbidity in those afflicted, ranging from sensory loss, motor loss, chronic pain, or a combination of deficits. Over time, research has investigated neuronal molecular mechanisms implicated in nerve damage, classified nerve injury, and developed surgical techniques for treatment. Despite these advancements, full functional recovery remains less than ideal. In this review, we discuss historical aspects of peripheral nerve injury and introduce nerve transfer as a therapeutic option, as well as an adjunct therapy to transplantation of Schwann cells and their stem cell derivatives for repair of the damaged nerve. This review furthermore, will provide an elaborated discussion on the sources of Schwann cells, including sites to harvest their progenitor and stem cell lines. This reflects the accessibility to an additional, concurrent treatment approach with nerve transfers that, predicated on related research, may increase the efficacy of the current approach. We then discuss the experimental and clinical investigations of both Schwann cells and nerve transfer that are underway. Lastly, we provide the necessary consideration that these two lines of therapeutic approaches should not be exclusive, but conversely, should be pursued as a combined modality given their mutual role in peripheral nerve regeneration.

Nerve Transfers to Restore Upper Extremity Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Update and Preliminary Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cervical spinal cord injury can result in profound loss of upper extremity function. Recent interest in the use of nerve transfers to restore volitional control is an exciting development in the care of these complex patients. In this article, the authors review preliminary results of nerve transfers in spinal cord injury.

METHODS

Review of the literature and the authors' cases series of 13 operations in nine spinal cord injury nerve transfer recipients was performed. Representative cases were reviewed to explore critical concepts and preliminary outcomes.

RESULTS

The nerve transfers used expendable donors (e.g., teres minor, deltoid, supinator, and brachialis) innervated above the level of the spinal cord injury to restore volitional control of missing function such as elbow extension, wrist extension, and/or hand function (posterior interosseous nerve or anterior interosseous nerve/finger flexors reinnervated). Results from the literature and the authors' patients (after a mean postsurgical follow-up of 12 months) indicate gains in function as assessed by both manual muscle testing and patients' self-reported outcomes measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve transfers can provide an alternative and consistent means of reestablishing volitional control of upper extremity function in people with cervical level spinal cord injury. Early outcomes provide evidence of substantial improvements in self-reported function despite relatively subtle objective gains in isolated muscle strength. Further work to investigate the optimal timing and combination of nerve transfer operations, the combination of these with traditional treatments (tendon transfer and functional electrical stimulation), and measurement of outcomes is imperative for determining the precise role of these operations.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

The role of elective amputation in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Despite undergoing complex brachial plexus, surgical reconstructions, and rehabilitation, some patients request an elective amputation. This study evaluates the role of elective amputation after brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for all the 2140 patients with brachial plexus injuries treated with elective amputation between 1999 and 2012 at a single institution. Analysis was conducted on the potential predisposing factors for amputation, amputation level, and postamputation complications. Patients were evaluated using pre- and postamputation Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and hand scores in addition to visual analog pain scores.

RESULTS

The following three conditions were observed in all nine patients who requested an elective amputation: (1) Pan-plexus injury; (2) non-recovery (mid-humeral amputation) or elbow flexion recovery only (forearm amputation) 1 year after all other surgical options were performed; and (3) at least one chronic complication (chronic infection, nonunion fractures, full-thickness burns, chronic neck pain with arm weight, etc.). Pain improvement was found in five patients. Subjective patient assessments and visual analog pain scores before and after amputation did not show a statistically significant improvement in Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand Scores. However, four patients reported that their shoulder pain felt "better" than it did before the amputation, and two patients indicated they were completely cured of chronic pain after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective amputation after brachial plexus injury should be considered as an option in the above circumstances. When the informed and educated decision is made, patients can have satisfactory outcomes regarding amputation.

Comparative study of phrenic and intercostal nerve transfers for elbow flexion after global brachial plexus injury

BACKGROUND

Global brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) are devastating events frequently resulting in severe functional impairment. The widely used nerve transfer sources for elbow flexion in patients with global BPIs include intercostal and phrenic nerves.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare phrenic and intercostal nerve transfers for elbow flexion after global BPI.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 33 patients treated with phrenic and intercostal nerve transfer for elbow flexion in posttraumatic global root avulsion BPI was carried out. In the phrenic nerve transfer group, the phrenic nerve was transferred to the anterolateral bundle of the anterior division of the upper trunk (23 patients); in the intercostal nerve transfer group, three intercostal nerves were coapted to the anterolateral bundles of the musculocutaneous nerve. The British Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system, angle of elbow flexion, and electromyography (EMG) were used to evaluate the recovery of elbow flexion at least 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The efficiency of motor function in the phrenic nerve transfer group was 83%, while it was 70% in the intercostal nerve transfer group. The two groups were not statistically different in terms of the MRC grade (p=0.646) and EMG results (p=0.646). The outstanding rates of angle of elbow flexion were 48% and 40% in the phrenic and intercostal nerve transfer groups, respectively. There was no significant difference of outstanding rates in the angle of elbow flexion between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Phrenic nerve transfer had a higher proportion of good prognosis for elbow flexion than intercostal nerve transfer, but the effective and outstanding rate had no significant difference for biceps reinnervation between the two groups according to MRC grading, angle of elbow flexion, and EMG.

Brachial plexus injuries: diagnosis performance and reliability of everyday tools

PURPOSE

Determining the patterns of brachial plexus injuries is challenging. Diagnostic methods have been used to facilitate diagnosis, but there is no consensus regarding which tool best complements physical examination (PE). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nerve conduction studies (NCSs) are instruments with widespread use and feasibility for everyday assessment. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of these diagnostic instruments and PE. We also assessed the agreement in the PE and diagnostic instrument findings of two experienced and certified hand surgeons.

METHODS

We reviewed data gathered from medical records and compared these data with the results of operative findings. We divided data according to the site of injury and the root injury patterns for all three diagnostic instruments (PE, MRI, and NCSs).

RESULTS

We considered 102 assessments. We found poor inter-observer agreement for the PE assessments and poor agreement among the PE, NCS, and MRI assessments. Diagnostic performance was higher for PE: sensitivity = 97.8 [95% confidence interval (C.I.) = 92.1-99.7]; specificity = 30.8 [95% C.I. = 9.1-61.4], and NCSs (sensitivity = 98.9 [95% C.I. = 93.9-100]; specificity = 23.1 [95% C.I. = 5-53.8]. MRI had inferior performance for all measurements. Separate analysis using pre- and post-ganglionic injuries revealed that PE had the lowest sensitivity, 46.7 (95% C.I. = 21.3-73.4) despite having the highest specificity, 81.6 (95% C.I. = 71.9-89.1).

DISCUSSION

Low agreement among the findings using different diagnostic instruments demonstrated that PE is the most specific tool, despite its low sensitivity. Detailed PE is cornerstone for evaluating brachial plexus injuries and NCSs are better than MRI for scrutinizing injuries not found in PE.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In our study, NCSs exhibited superior performance to MRI, and should be considered a more reliable supporting tool after detailed PE.

Brachial plexopathy

Brachial plexus injury can occur as a result of trauma, inflammation or malignancies, and associated complications. The current topic is concerned with various forms of brachial plexopathy, its clinical features, pathophysiology, imaging findings, and management. Idiopathic brachial neuritis (IBN), often preceded with antecedent events such as infection, commonly present with abruptonset painful asymmetric upper limb weakness with associated wasting around the shoulder girdle and arm muscles. Idiopathic hypertrophic brachial neuritis, a rare condition, is usually painless to begin with, unlike IBN. Hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy is an autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by repeated episodes of paralysis and sensory disturbances in an affected limb, which is preceded by severe pain. While the frequency of the episodes tends to decrease with age, affected individuals suffer from residual deficits. Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome affects the lower trunk of the brachial plexus. It is diagnosed on the basis of electrophysiology and is amenable to surgical intervention. Cancer-related brachial plexopathy may occur secondary to metastatic infiltration or radiation therapy. Traumatic brachial plexus injury is commonly encountered in neurology, orthopedic, and plastic surgery set-ups. Trauma may be a direct blow or traction or stretch injury. The prognosis depends on the extent and site of injury as well as the surgical expertise.

Functional outcome of nerve transfers for traumatic global brachial plexus avulsion

BACKGROUND

The treatment of global brachial plexus avulsion is a demanding field of hand and upper extremity surgery. The recent development of functional and quality-of-life (QOL) assessment tools has improved quantifying these functional outcomes after surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to combine Medical Research Council (MRC) grading with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaires and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain to evaluate the functional outcome of patients who suffered complete brachial plexus avulsion before and after nerve transfers.

METHODS

The author carried out a retrospective review of 37 patients with global avulsion of the brachial plexus between 2000 and 2007. All of them underwent nerve transfers in Hua Shan Hospital in Shanghai. They were followed up for over 3 years for physical examination and responding to the questionnaires of DASH, NRS, as well as the satisfaction with the surgery.

RESULTS

The mean time to surgery was less than 6 months and the mean follow-up period was 4.59 years (range: 3-9 years). The effective motor recovery rate was 54%, 86%, 46% and 43%, respectively, in supraspinatus, biceps, triceps and finger flexor. Patients who underwent nerve transfers scored consistently better on the DASH score and NRS score than those before surgery. There was also a significant correlation between the change in NRS scores and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

This study validated the effect of nerve transfers for global brachial plexus avulsions from objective MRC grading combining with patients' self-assessments. Neurolysis after neurotisations correlated positively with functional outcomes.

What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?

Brachial plexus injuries, in all their severity and complexity, have been extensively studied. Although brachial plexus injuries are associated with serious and often definitive sequelae, many concepts have changed since the 1950s, when this pathological condition began to be treated more aggressively. Looking back over the last 20 years, it can be seen that the entire approach, from diagnosis to treatment, has changed significantly. Some concepts have become better established, while others have been introduced; thus, it can be said that currently, something can always be offered in terms of functional recovery, regardless of the degree of injury. Advances in microsurgical techniques have enabled improved results after neurolysis and have made it possible to perform neurotization, which has undoubtedly become the greatest differential in treating brachial plexus injuries. Improvements in imaging devices and electrical studies have allowed quick decisions that are reflected in better surgical outcomes. In this review, we intend to show the many developments in brachial plexus surgery that have significantly changed the results and have provided hope to the victims of this serious injury.

Neurotization from two medial pectoral nerves to musculocutaneous nerve in a pediatric brachial plexus injury

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries can be devastating, causing partial to total denervation of the muscles of the upper extremities. Surgical reconstruction can restore motor and/or sensory function following nerve injuries. Direct nerve-to-nerve transfers can provide a closer nerve source to the target muscle, thereby enhancing the quality and rate of recovery. Restoration of elbow flexion is the primary goal for patients with brachial plexus injuries. A 4-year-old right-hand-dominant male sustained a fracture of the left scapula in a car accident. He was treated conservatively. After the accident, he presented with motor weakness of the left upper extremity. Shoulder abduction was grade 3 and elbow flexor was grade 0. Hand function was intact. Nerve conduction studies and an electromyogram were performed, which revealed left lateral and posterior cord brachial plexopathy with axonotmesis. He was admitted to Rehabilitation Medicine and treated. However, marked neurological dysfunction in the left upper extremity was still observed. Six months after trauma, under general anesthesia with the patient in the supine position, the brachial plexus was explored through infraclavicular and supraclavicular incisions. Each terminal branch was confirmed by electrophysiology. Avulsion of the C5 roots and absence of usable stump proximally were confirmed intraoperatively. Under a microscope, neurotization from the musculocutaneous nerve to two medial pectoral nerves was performed with nylon 8-0. Physical treatment and electrostimulation started 2 weeks postoperatively. At a 3-month postoperative visit, evidence of reinnervation of the elbow flexors was observed. At his last follow-up, 2 years following trauma, the patient had recovered Medical Research Council (MRC) grade 4+ elbow flexors. We propose that neurotization from medial pectoral nerves to musculocutaneous nerve can be used successfully to restore elbow flexion in patients with brachial plexus injuries.

Nerve transfers

Nerve transfers have been performed for many years, but the technique is further developing and gaining increased recognition as a time-tested procedure. The original operations are continually modified to treat a wide variety of peripheral nerve injuries, and yield reliable results. In addition, nerve transfers can be used in conjunction with tendon transfers or nerve grafts in order to best treat a specific patient's set of deficits. This review of nerve transfers briefly discusses the evolution of the technique, general principles, some specific transfers, post-operative rehabilitation, and their place on the reconstructive ladder.

Use of bioabsorbable nerve conduits as an adjunct to brachial plexus neurorrhaphy

PURPOSE

The use of bioabsorbable conduits in digital nerve repair has demonstrated increased efficacy compared to direct repair (for gaps ≤ 4mm) and nerve grafting (for gaps ≥ 8 mm) for sensory recovery in a level 1 human trial. Although nonhuman primate studies on mixed motor-sensory nerves have documented comparable efficacy of the bioabsorbable nerve conduits when compared to nerve repair or grafting, there is minimal human clinical data on motor recovery following bioabsorbable nerve conduit repair. This study investigates the outcomes of bioabsorbable nerve conduits in pure motor nerve reconstruction for adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

METHODS

Over a 3-year period, 21 adult patients had 1 or more nerve-to-nerve transfers for traumatic brachial plexus palsy performed using the operative microscope. Ten nerve transfers were performed by advancing the nerve ends into a semi-permeable type I collagen conduit stabilized with 8-0 nylon sutures (conduit-assisted neurorrhaphy). Twenty-eight concurrent nerve transfers were performed using standard end-to-end neurorrhaphy and 8-0 or 9-0 nylon sutures. Clinical evaluation using the Medical Research Council grading system (MRC) was performed at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Postoperative electromyographic studies were performed in 28 of 38 transfers at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty transfers (17 patients) were available for 2-year follow-up evaluation. All 10 transfers performed with nerve conduits demonstrated clinical recovery and electromyographic reinnervation at 2 years. Eighteen of 20 transfers performed without conduits demonstrated clinical recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no statistical difference in functional recovery was seen in nerve transfers performed with collagen nerve conduits or by traditional neurorrhaphy, this pilot series demonstrated clinical and electromyographic recovery in 10 of 10 motor nerve repairs performed using conduits. These findings warrant continued investigation into the efficacy of conduit-assisted repair for motor nerves, especially in regards to operative time, precision of repair, and speed of nerve recovery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Health-related quality of life and functional outcomes following nerve transfers for traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries

We report the patient-scored Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and functional outcomes of a cohort of 21 consecutive patients undergoing nerve transfer surgery for traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries. Outcomes were assessed using the British Medical Research Council power grading system, Short-Form 36, Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, and Pain Visual Analogue Scale (PVAS). The mean age of our cohort was 29.8 years (range 18-53 years), with a mean follow-up period of 42.9 months. At follow-up, elbow flexion ≥ M3 strength was achieved in 17/21 patients. Shoulder abduction ≥ M3 was achieved in 14/19 patients. External rotation ≥ M3 strength was achieved in 11/15 patients. Delayed surgical repair correlated negatively with HRQoL outcomes. Higher injury severity scores and smoking were associated with higher PVAS scores. These findings provide key prognostic information for patients and peripheral nerve surgeons embarking upon this intensive pathway to potential recovery.

Nerve transfers for the upper extremity: new horizons in nerve reconstruction

Nerve transfers are key components of the surgeon's armamentarium in brachial plexus and complex nerve reconstruction. Advantages of nerve transfers are that nerve regeneration distances are shortened, pure motor or sensory nerve fascicles can be selected as donors, and nerve grafts are generally not required. Similar to the principle of tendon transfers, expendable donor nerves are transferred to denervated nerves with the goal of functional recovery. Transfers may be subdivided into intraplexal, extraplexal, and distal types; each has a unique role in the reconstructive process. A thorough diagnostic workup and intraoperative assessment help guide the surgeon in their use. Nerve transfers have made a positive impact on the outcomes of nerve surgery and are essential tools in complex nerve reconstruction.

Outcome of nerve transfers for traumatic complete brachial plexus avulsion: results of 28 patients by DASH and NRS questionnaires

The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients who suffered complete brachial plexus avulsion before and after nerve transfers by assessing upper extremity function and pain using the DASH and NRS questionnaires. Patients who underwent nerve transfers improved their DASH and NRS scores compared with before surgery. Although individually there was no correlation with improved scores, the triple combination of rehabilitation exercises, electrical stimulation therapy and neurotrophic drugs postoperatively correlated positively with improved functional outcomes. This study suggested a positive effect of the passage of time and nerve transfers in total brachial plexus avulsions from patients' self assessments.

Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis

BACKGROUND

In treating patients with brachial plexus injury, there are no comparative data on the outcomes of nerve grafts or nerve transfers for isolated upper trunk or C5-C6-C7 root injuries. The purpose of our study was to compare, with systematic review, the outcomes for modern intraplexal nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow function with autogenous nerve grafting for upper brachial plexus traumatic injuries.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies in which patients had surgery for traumatic upper brachial plexus palsy within one year of injury and with a minimum follow-up of twelve months. Strength and shoulder and elbow motion were assessed as outcome measures. The Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare outcomes, with an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred and forty-seven (83%) and 286 (96%) of 299 patients with nerve transfers achieved elbow flexion strength of grade M4 or greater and M3 or greater, respectively, compared with thirty-two (56%) and forty-seven (82%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). Forty (74%) of fifty-four patients with dual nerve transfers for shoulder function had shoulder abduction strength of grade M4 or greater compared with twenty (35%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve transfer to a single nerve and thirteen (46%) of twenty-eight patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). The average shoulder abduction and external rotation was 122° (range, 45° to 170°) and 108° (range, 60° to 140°) after dual nerve transfers and 50° (range, 0° to 100°) and 45° (range, 0° to 140°) in patients with nerve transfers to a single nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with demonstrated complete traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries of C5-C6, the pooled international data strongly favors dual nerve transfer over traditional nerve grafting for restoration of improved shoulder and elbow function. These data may be helpful to surgeons considering intraoperative options, particularly in cases in which the native nerve root or trunk may appear less than optimal, or when long nerve grafts are contemplated.

Use of quantitative intra-operative electrodiagnosis during partial ulnar nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion

The transfer of part of the ulnar nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve, first described by Oberlin, can restore flexion of the elbow following brachial plexus injury. In this study we evaluated the additional benefits and effectiveness of quantitative electrodiagnosis to select a donor fascicle. Eight patients who had undergone transfer of a simple fascicle of the ulnar nerve to the motor branch of the musculocutaneous nerve were evaluated. In two early patients electrodiagnosis had not been used. In the remaining six patients, however, all fascicles of the ulnar nerve were separated and electrodiagnosis was performed after stimulation with a commercially available electromyographic system. In these procedures, recording electrodes were placed in flexor carpi ulnaris and the first dorsal interosseous. A single fascicle in the flexor carpi ulnaris in which a high amplitude had been recorded was selected as a donor and transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve. In the two patients who had not undergone electrodiagnosis, the recovery of biceps proved insufficient for normal use. Conversely, in the six patients in whom quantitative electrodiagnosis was used, elbow flexion recovered to an M4 level.

Quantitative intra-operative electrodiagnosis is an effective method of selecting a favourable donor fascicle during the Oberlin procedure. Moreover, fascicles showing a high-amplitude in reading flexor carpi ulnaris are donor nerves that can restore normal elbow flexion without intrinsic loss.

Clinical outcomes following median to radial nerve transfers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with radial nerve palsy who underwent nerve transfers using redundant fascicles of median nerve (innervating the flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor carpi radialis muscles) to the posterior interosseous nerve and the nerve to the extensor carpi radialis brevis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of the clinical records of 19 patients with radial nerve injuries who underwent nerve transfer procedures using the median nerve as a donor nerve. All patients were evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system. The mean age of patients was 41 years (range, 17-78 y). All patients received at least 12 months of follow-up (range, 20.3 ± 5.8 mo). Surgery was performed at a mean of 5.7 ± 1.9 months postinjury.

RESULTS

Postoperative functional evaluation was graded according to the following scale: grades MRC 0/5 to MRC 2/5 were considered poor outcomes, whereas an MRC grade of 3/5 was a fair result, 4/5 was a good result, and 4+/5 was an excellent outcome. Postoperatively, all patients except one had good to excellent recovery of wrist extension. A total of 12 patients recovered good to excellent finger and thumb extension, 2 had fair recovery, and 5 had poor recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The radial nerve is commonly injured, causing severe morbidity in affected patients. The median nerve provides a reliable source of donor nerve fascicles for radial nerve reinnervation. The important nuances of both surgical technique and motor reeducation critical for the success of this transfer have been identified and are discussed.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.