A Real-World Study of Patients with Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes

Access to Diagnostics and Treatment for People With Metastatic EGFR-Positive NSCLC: Lessons From Project PRIORITY

Introduction

The treatment landscape for people diagnosed with EGFR-mutated (EGFR-m) NSCLC has rapidly evolved, yet there remains limited self-reported information about the lived experience. In this paper, we describe the clinical characteristics and treatment experiences of people living with EGFR-m lung cancer from Project PRIORITY, a patient-driven study.

Methods

An online survey was distributed among the EGFR Resisters community between April 2019 and January 2020. The survey captured participants' demographics and lung cancer risk factors, diagnostic and treatment pathways, and prevalence of side effects. Descriptive statistics were used and included subgroups based on residency and cancer stage.

Results

Of the 425 participants, most were female (67%), under 60 years old (53%), and resided in the United States (74%). The most frequently reported symptom at diagnosis was cough (54%), though 18% reported no symptoms. In addition, 89% reported receiving at least one tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); osimertinib was the most prescribed first-line TKI for stage IV participants diagnosed after 2017. Participants residing in the United States were more likely to have access to advanced diagnostic (next-generating sequencing) and newer treatments such as osimertinib. Just under half of the sample (47%) had experienced progressive disease and were no longer on first-line treatment.

Conclusion

The TKI era has been practice changing; however, little is understood from the perspective of people living with EGFR-m NSCLC. This paper is the first to explore this and found it is possible to have people self-report complex health information about their lung cancer. In addition, although most participants were diagnosed after osimertinib became guideline-recommended treatment, disparities in treatment were identified.

Real-world pharmacovigilance analysis unveils the toxicity profile of amivantamab targeting EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

While clinical trials have demonstrated enduring responses to amivantamab among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients bearing EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, the associated toxicity profile in real-world scenarios remains elusive.

METHODS

This pharmacovigilance study analyzed data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate adverse events associated with amivantamab over the period from September 2021 to December 2023. A comprehensive disproportionality analysis was performed, employing the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM), and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network to calculate information components (ICs), to identify statistically significant adverse events.

RESULTS

A significant proportion of adverse events (AEs) was attributable to injury, poisoning, and procedural complications, cutaneous disorders, respiratory ailments, infections, as well as vascular and lymphatic system disturbances. There were noteworthy incidences of AEs including infusion-related reactions, rash, dyspnea, pneumonitis, paronychia, pulmonary embolism, thrombocytopenia, nausea, acneiform dermatitis, deep vein thrombosis, febrile neutropenia, peripheral edema, hypokalemia, and neutropenia. Furthermore, the majority of AEs occurred within the first month following the initiation of amivantamab treatment, accounting for 51.74% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The reversibility of amivantamab-related toxicities suggests its promising utility in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations NSCLC.

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy may be efficacious for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with near-loop insertions of EGFR exon 20: A retrospective analysis

ObjectiveThe sensitivity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy is low in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins). This study aims at investigating the effectiveness of the combination of ICI and chemotherapy (ICI-combined regimen) in a real-world population of NSCLC patients harboring near-loop insertions of EGFR exon 20.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins from April 2016 to March 2021 at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, China. A total of 126 cases of EGFR ex20ins were screened from 1610 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations and 62 cases were further analyzed for different therapeutic efficacy.ResultsThe first-line ICI-combined regimen showed marked efficacy for near-loop insertions of EGFR exon 20, with an ORR of 71.4% and a mPFS of 11.5 months, compared to ORRs of 12.5% for traditional targeted therapy (P = .003) and 18.8% for chemotherapy (P = .013). The first-line mPFS of traditional EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy were only 5.6 and 5.8 months, respectively. Similar results were observed for any-line therapy of ICI-combined regimen, with an ORR of 80%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of any-line therapy of ICI-combined regimen was 11.5 months, which were significantly longer than that of traditional targeted therapy (4.5 months, P = .026) and chemotherapy (5.0 months, P = .013).ConclusionsICI-combined regimen may be superior compared to targeted therapy and chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC with near-loop insertions of EGFR exon 20. Further exploration is warranted to confirm the efficacy of ICI-combined regimen.

A real‑world study of clinical characteristics, treatment sequence and outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

OBJECTIVES

EGFR exon 20 insertion (EGFRex20ins) mutations are found in up to 4% of all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These patients are often insensitive to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and have worse prognosis than patients with more common EGFR mutations. In this multicenter, retrospective, real-world study, we sought to determine whether the administration of recently approved treatments that specifically target EGFRex20ins mutations could significantly improve outcomes in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the clinical features of 41 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and EGFRex20ins mutations, their evolution, and response to treatments received across 7 hospitals in the Valencian Community, Spain, between 31st December 2012 and 31st December 2022.

RESULTS

32 patients (72%) developed metastatic disease, and 29 (71%) of them received oncological treatment. We found that administering a targeted therapy against EGFRex20ins mutations (amivantamab, mobocertinib and/or sunvozertinib) at some point during the course of treatment, significantly increased the median OS of metastatic patients from 8 months (95% CI 0-21.7) to 30 months (95% CI 11.1-48.8; Hazard ratio = 0.297, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Our findings contribute to the evolving standard of care for this specific population and highlight the clinical benefits of targeted cancer therapies.

Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Egfr-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Osimertinib: Real-World Outcomes and Insights

Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), demonstrated superior efficacy over first-generation TKIs in the FLAURA trial, resulting in its approval as first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world application of these trial results requires an evaluation of sequential therapeutic strategies. Methods: This retrospective, non-interventional study utilized data from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) platform, which includes information on patients treated for lung cancer since 2015. Out of 39,974 patients in the database, 624 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first-line (L1, n = 198) or second-line (L2, n = 426) treatment after first- or second-generation TKIs (n = 1262) were identified. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment strategies, and disease progression were examined. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: In the study population (n = 624), 73.4% were female, with a median age of 70 years (range 28-93). Brain metastases at the start of osimertinib treatment were observed in 282 patients. ECOG PS-2 was reported in 29.4% of patients. The T790M mutation in exon 20 was identified in 257/426 patients (60.3%) receiving osimertinib in L2. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% CI [10.7-14.7]) for L1 and 7.4 months (95% CI [6.2-8.7]) for L2. Median overall survival (OS) from advanced diagnosis was 28.5 months (95% CI [26.3-38.7]) for osimertinib L1 and 29.9 months (95% CI [28.6-31.8]) for osimertinib L2 (HR = 0.93; 95% CI [0.75-1.16]; p = 0.50). For L1, median OS was 27.1 months (95% CI [22.0-30.2]) for patients with cerebral metastases and 38.7 months (95% CI [26.3-52.8]) for those without (HR = 0.73; 95% CI [0.48-1.11]; p = 0.15). Discussion: Patients in the real-world ESME database exhibited a poorer prognosis compared to those in the FLAURA trial. The presence of cerebral metastases at diagnosis worsens the prognosis.

'Plasma first' approach for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The treatment approach for recently diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations primarily relies on confirming the tissue diagnosis as non-squamous NSCLC. This routine clinical practice of tissue diagnosis imposes several barriers and delays in turnaround time (TAT) for biomarker testing, significantly delaying the time to treatment. The objective of this study is to investigate the 'plasma first' approach for detection of EGFR mutation in advanced stage treatment naïve NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We prospectively collected blood samples of treatment naïve patients with clinical and radiological suspicion of advanced stage NSCLC prior to obtaining tissue biopsy. Plasma cfDNA was tested for EGFR mutation using two different methods. We compared the sensitivity and TAT of liquid biopsy with tissue biopsy.

RESULTS

In total, we analyzed plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of 236 patients suspected of having advanced NSCLC for EGFR mutations. We observed a notably shorter turnaround time (TAT) of 3 days, which was significantly quicker compared to the 12-day TAT for tissue biopsy (p < 0.05). The ddPCR method had a sensitivity of 82.8%, which was higher than 66.34% sensitivity of ARMS-PCR. The current study also highlights that there is no significant difference in the clinical outcome of the patients whether treated based on liquid biopsy only or tissue biopsy (median progression-free survival of 11.56 vs. 11.9 months; p = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing a 'plasma first' strategy, given its shorter turnaround time, strong positive concordance and comparable outcomes to tissue biopsy, emerges as a highly specific and reliable method for detecting EGFR mutations in advanced-stage NSCLC.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutation

The discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has greatly changed the clinical outlook for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unlike the most common EGFR mutations, such as exon 19 deletion (del19) and exon 21 L858R point mutation, EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation (EGFR ex20ins) is a rare mutation of EGFR. Due to its structural specificity, it exhibits primary resistance to traditional epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), leading to poor overall survival prognosis for patients. In recent years, there has been continuous progress in the development of new drugs targeting EGFR ex20ins, bringing new hope for the treatment of this patient population. In this regard, we conducted a systematic review of the molecular characteristics, diagnostic advances, and treatment status of EGFR ex20ins. We summarized the latest data on relevant drug development and clinical research, aiming to provide reference for clinical diagnosis, treatment, and drug development.

The state of the art of EGFR exon 20 insertions in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and future perspectives

Insertions in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 (Ex20Ins) are the third most incident mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The hypervariable nature of these driver mutations hinders their identification by traditional polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, requiring a comprehensive sequencing approach to detect all possible insertions. The prognosis of patients with EGFR Ex20Ins is similar to those with wild-type NSCLC, since no targeted drugs are approved in the first-line setting, and platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the front-line treatment. However, the new generation of drugs currently being tested in first and post-platinum settings will likely change the management of this entity. Here, we summarize the latest data on EGFR Ex20Ins molecular characteristics, patient profile, identification challenges, and emerging therapies to help lung clinicians face a growing treatment landscape.

EGFR and ERBB2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Chinese Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Pathological and Molecular Characterization, and First-Line Systemic Treatment Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Data from studies looking at both EGFR and ERBB2 exon 20 insertion mutations (-20ins) in the same cohort of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze EGFR/ERBB2-20ins in all-stage NSCLC patients to reveal their histological and molecular features, and to retrospectively evaluate the results of first-line real-world systemic treatments in patients with advanced-stage disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected 13,920 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded NSCLC specimens. Clinicopathological features were recorded and DNA-based next-generation sequencing was performed. First-line systemic treatment data were obtained via chart review.

RESULTS

In total, 414 (2.97%) EGFR-20ins cases and 666 (4.78%) ERBB2-20ins cases were identified. Both were more common in women, non-smokers, and patients with adenocarcinoma. The incidence of EGFR/ERBB2-20ins in adenocarcinoma is inversely proportional to the degree of invasion; 77 and 26 variants were detected in EGFR-20ins and ERBB2-20ins cases, respectively. The most common concurrently mutated genes were TP53 and RB1. In invasive adenocarcinoma, lepidic components were more common in EGFR/ERBB2-20ins-alone cases than in those with other concurrent mutated genes. In EGFR-/ERBB2-20ins patients, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or treatment response to first-line systemic treatments in this study. There was no significant difference in PFS or treatment response among patients with different EGFR/ERBB2-20ins variants and those with or without concurrent mutated genes.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR/ERBB2-20ins is more common in early lung adenocarcinoma. EGFR-20ins had more variants. In both cohorts, the results for first-line systemic treatments showed no significant difference.

Oncogenic alterations in advanced NSCLC: a molecular super-highway

Lung cancer ranks among the most common cancers world-wide and is the first cancer-related cause of death. The classification of lung cancer has evolved tremendously over the past two decades. Today, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly lung adenocarcinoma, comprises a multitude of molecular oncogenic subsets that change both the prognosis and management of disease.Since the first targeted oncogenic alteration identified in 2004, with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), there has been unprecedented progress in identifying and targeting new molecular alterations. Almost two decades of experience have allowed scientists to elucidate the biological function of oncogenic drivers and understand and often overcome the molecular basis of acquired resistance mechanisms. Today, targetable molecular alterations are identified in approximately 60% of lung adenocarcinoma patients in Western populations and 80% among Asian populations. Oncogenic drivers are largely enriched among non-smokers, east Asians, and younger patients, though each alteration has its own patient phenotype.The current landscape of druggable molecular targets includes EGFR, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1), Kirstin rat sarcoma virus (KRAS), human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2), c-MET proto-oncogene (MET), neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK), rearranged during transfection (RET), neuregulin 1 (NRG1). In addition to these known targets, others including Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) have garnered significant attention and are the subject of numerous ongoing trials.In this era of personalized, precision medicine, it is of paramount importance to identify known or potential oncogenic drivers in each patient. The development of targeted therapy is mirrored by diagnostic progress. Next generation sequencing offers high-throughput, speed and breadth to identify molecular alterations in entire genomes or targeted regions of DNA or RNA. It is the basis for the identification of the majority of current druggable alterations and offers a unique window into novel alterations, and de novo and acquired resistance mechanisms.In this review, we discuss the diagnostic approach in advanced NSCLC, focusing on current oncogenic driver alterations, through their pathophysiology, management, and future perspectives. We also explore the shortcomings and hurdles encountered in this rapidly evolving field.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of YK-029A in Treatment-Naive Patients With Advanced NSCLC Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations: A Phase 1 Trial

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations are limited. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of YK-029A, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and the preliminary efficacy of YK-029A in treatment-naive patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation.

METHODS

This multicenter, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion phase 1 clinical trial enrolled patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. During the dose-escalation phase, YK-029A was orally administered using the traditional 3+3 principle at 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mg/d. In the dose-expansion phase, treatment-naive patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations were enrolled and administered YK-029A 200 mg/d. The primary end point was safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

The safety analysis included 108 patients. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (50.9%), diarrhea (49.1%), and rash (34.3%). There was minimal drug accumulation after multiple doses. A total of 28 treatment-naive patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations were enrolled in the dose-expansion and 26 were included in the efficacy analysis. According to the independent review committee evaluation, the objective response rate was 73.1% (95% confidence interval: 52.21%-88.43%), and the disease control rate was 92.3% (95% confidence interval: 74.87%-99.05%).

CONCLUSIONS

YK-029A was found to have manageable safety and be tolerable in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations and have promising antitumor activity in untreated patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations.

Epidemiological characteristics and therapeutic advances of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

The third most prevalent type of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, EGFR exon 20 insertions (EGFRex20ins), involves 2%-12% of all cases of EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approximately 90% of the mutations occur within the loop structure region, and the most frequently reported subtypes are A767_V769dup and S768_D770dup, which together account for almost 50% of instances. Apart from the unique subtype of A763_Y764insFQEA, NSCLCs with EGFRex20ins are resistant to approved EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and are also insensitive to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. A new modality of treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFRx20ins has been established with the approval of mobocertinib and amivantamab. There are also numerous novel targeted treatments for NSCLC with EGFRex20ins in development, which are anticipated to improve this patient population's survival even further. This review provides a reference for the clinical management of these patients by summarizing the most recent epidemiological, and clinicopathological characteristics, diagnostic techniques, and therapeutic advances of EGFRex20ins in NSCLC.

A comprehensive overview of the heterogeneity of EGFR exon 20 variants in NSCLC and (pre)clinical activity to currently available treatments

Activating EGFR mutations are commonly observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). About 4-10 % of all activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are heterogenous in-frame deletion and/or insertion mutations clustering within exon 20 (EGFRex20+). NSCLC patients with EGFRex20+ mutations are treated as a single disease entity, irrespective of the type and location of the mutation. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature reporting both in vitro and clinical drug sensitivity across different EGFRex20+ mutations. The activating A763_Y764insFQEA mutation has a better tumor response in comparison with mutations in the near- and far regions directly following the C-helix and should therefore be treated differently. For other EGFRex20+ mutations marked differences in treatment responses have been reported indicating the need for a classification beyond the exon-based classification. A further classification can be achieved using a structure-function modeling approach and experimental data using patient-derived cell lines. The detailed overview of TKI responses for each EGFRex20+ mutation can assist treating physicians to select the most optimal drug for individual NSCLC patients.

Indirect comparison of mobocertinib and real-world therapies for pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

OBJECTIVES

Mobocertinib, a novel oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is available for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations after platinum chemotherapy. We performed an indirect comparison of clinical trial data and real-world data (RWD) to determine the relative efficacy of mobocertinib vs. other treatments for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on the efficacy of mobocertinib from a phase I/II trial (NCT02716116) were compared to RWD from a retrospective study in 12 German centers using inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, smoking status, presence of brain metastasis, time from advanced diagnosis, and histology. Tumor response assessment was based on RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

The analysis included 114 patients in the mobocertinib group and 43 in the RWD group. The confirmed overall response rate (cORR) according to investigator assessment was 0% for standard treatments and 35.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.4-44.6) for mobocertinib (p < 0.0001). Compared to standard regimens in the weighted population, mobocertinib prolonged overall survival (OS, median [95% CI] = 9.8 [4.3-13.7] vs. 20.2 [14.9-25.3] months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42 [0.25-0.69], p = 0.0035), progression-free survival (PFS, median [95% CI] = 2.6 [1.5-5.7] vs. 7.3 [5.6-8.8] months; HR = 0.28 [0.18-0.44], p < 0.0001), and time to treatment discontinuation (median [95% CI] = 2.1 [1.2-3.1] vs. 7.4 [6.4-8.5] months; HR = 0.34 [0.18-0.65], p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

Mobocertinib was associated with an improved cORR and prolonged PFS and OS compared to standard treatments for patients with EGFR ex20ins-positive NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

An Adjusted Treatment Comparison Comparing Amivantamab Versus Real-World Clinical Practice in Europe and the United States for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with Exon 20 insertion mutations (Exon20ins) have poor prognoses, exacerbated by a previous lack of specific treatment guidelines and unmet need for targeted therapies. Amivantamab, an EGFR and MET bispecific antibody, demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with Exon20ins following platinum-based therapy in CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776; Cohort D+). Since CHRYSALIS was single-arm, individual patient data (IPD)-based adjusted analyses versus similar patients in real-world clinical practice (RWCP) were conducted to generate comparative evidence.

METHODS

RWCP cohorts were derived from seven European and US real-world sources, comprising patients fulfilling CHRYSALIS Cohort D+ eligibility criteria. Amivantamab was compared with a basket of RWCP treatments. Differences in prognostic characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability weighting (IPW; average treatment effect among the treated [ATT]). Balance between cohorts was assessed using standardized mean differences (SMDs). Overall response rate (ORR; investigator- [INV] and independent review committee-assessed [IRC]), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS; INV and IRC) and time-to-next treatment (TTNT) were compared. Binary and time-to-event endpoints were analyzed using weighted logistic regression and proportional hazards regression, respectively.

RESULTS

Pre-adjustment, baseline characteristics were comparable between cohorts. IPW ATT-adjustment improved comparability, giving closely matched characteristics. ORR (INV) was 36.8% for amivantamab versus 17.0% for the adjusted EU + US cohort (response rate ratio [RR]: 2.16). Median OS, PFS (INV) and TTNT were 22.77 versus 12.52 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47; p < 0.0001), 6.93 versus 4.17 months (HR: 0.55; p < 0.0001) and 12.42 versus 5.36 months (HR: 0.44; p < 0.0001) for amivantamab versus the adjusted EU + US cohort, respectively. Results were consistent versus EU- and US-only cohorts, and when using IRC assessment.

CONCLUSION

Adjusted comparisons demonstrated significantly improved outcomes for amivantamab versus RWCP, highlighting the value of amivantamab in addressing unmet need in patients with advanced EGFR Exon20ins NSCLC following platinum-based therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CHRYSALIS: NCT02609776.

Optimizing diagnosis and treatment of EGFR exon 20 insertions mutant NSCLC

The Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon (ex) 20 insertions (ins) has been considered as an "undruggable target" for a long time, with platinum-pemetrexed combination recommended as upfront standard treatment for newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Recent preliminary data from early phase clinical trials have demonstrated that pharmacological inhibition of EGFRex20ins is possible, offering new treatment opportunities to 1-2% of advanced NSCLC patients harboring such hard-to-treat molecular alteration. Among the different drugs under clinical investigation, both amivantamab and mobocertinib have received regulatory approval in the United States, by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), while amivantamab has been recently approved also in Europe, for the clinical treatment of advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFRex20ins who failed at least one prior line of systemic therapy, representing a major breakthrough in lung cancer treatment over the last year. With novel effective targeted options on the horizon, there is a renewed interest on optimizing the molecular screening of advanced NSCLC, and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genotyping is currently considered the gold standard approach to profile advanced NSCLC patients, as recommended by international guidelines. Herein we provide an updated overview of the most recent findings and upcoming challenges regarding both molecular detection and therapeutic management of EGFR ex20ins mutant advanced NSCLC patients.

Real-World Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Mutation Testing Patterns Among US Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 15% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm). Mutation testing (including EGFRm) is recommended for patients with advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) prior to initiating first-line therapy (L1) or after progression on targeted therapy. To elucidate current and future unmet needs, the present study characterized real-world EGFR testing patterns and treatment patterns in patients with aNSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated newly diagnosed adult patients with aNSCLC (stage IIIB or higher) from the Flatiron Health database. Eligible patients received at least L1 during 2015-2020 (testing cohorts) or 2011-2020 (treatment cohorts). Eligible patients for the treatment cohorts had an EGFR mutation.

RESULTS

The testing cohort included 22,726 patients, 75.5% had at least one EGFR test and 15.2% of those tested were positive for EGFR mutation. From 2015 to 2020, the median time from sample collection to test results decreased substantially while the proportion of NGS EGFR tests and use of plasma samples increased. The treatment cohort included 3701 patients (95% common mutations [cEGFR], 5.0% exon 20 insertions [ex20ins]). Three or more lines of therapy (LOTs) were observed in approximately 30% of patients. For L1, most cEGFR patients received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI, 68.1%) or platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC, 24.8%); most ex20ins patients received PBC (66.1%) or EGFR-TKI (17.5%). The most common L2 was EGFR-TKI (54.1%) or PBC (22.8%) for cEGFR and immunotherapy (25.9%) or PBC (25.9%) for ex20ins. No predominant L3 was evident in either group.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study, among the largest analyses of testing patterns for patients with aNSCLC, demonstrates a comprehensive view of treatment patterns for patients with EGFR mutations, including ex20ins. Despite recent improvement, increased use of EGFR testing, including advanced methods, is needed to optimize treatment pathways and outcomes. Additionally, the lack of a predominant therapy in later lines indicates a need for new therapies.

Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer in Europe: A Pragmatic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Information on the epidemiology of uncommon EGFR mutations including exon 20 insertions amongst non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lacking.

Objective

The objective of this pragmatic literature review (PLR) and meta-analysis was to generate robust prevalence and incidence estimates based on ranges of exon 20 insertion mutations reported in the literature.

Materials and methods

Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, congresses and reference lists for articles published from 2013 in key European countries of interest (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom) were performed. Articles were reviewed against pre-specified criteria and their quality was appraised using a published checklist. Prevalence estimates were synthesised by random-effects meta-analyses.

Results

Eighty unique studies of moderate-to-high quality were included in the PLR. The meta-analysed prevalence for EGFR mutations was 12.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.0, 14.1) in any stage NSCLC and 14.8% (12.8, 17.1) in advanced/metastatic NSCLC. The prevalence of exon 20 insertions was 0.7% (0.4, 1.1) in any stage NSCLC and 6.1% (4.0, 9.4) in any stage EGFR-positive NSCLC. Mutation status was primarily measured using direct sequencing or a combination of methods. One study reporting exon 20 insertions in advanced/metastatic disease was identified, which reported a prevalence of 0.5% in overall NSCLC and 4.0% in EGFR-positive NSCLC.

Conclusions

EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations are rare in NSCLC. There is a high unmet need in patients with exon 20 insertions, including effective therapies. Prospective cohort studies are needed to better clinically characterise these patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-022-00868-z.