Vertebral morphometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures assessment (VFA)

[Osteoporosis-Definition, risk assessment, diagnosis, prevention and treatment (update 2024) : Guidelines of the Austrian Society for Bone and Mineral Research]

BACKGROUND

Austria is among the countries with the highest incidence and prevalence of osteoporotic fractures worldwide. Guidelines for the prevention and management of osteoporosis were first published in 2010 under the auspices of the then Federation of Austrian Social Security Institutions and updated in 2017. The present comprehensively updated guidelines of the Austrian Society for Bone and Mineral Research are aimed at physicians of all specialties as well as decision makers and institutions in the Austrian healthcare system. The aim of these guidelines is to strengthen and improve the quality of medical care of patients with osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in Austria.

METHODS

These evidence-based recommendations were compiled taking randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as European and international reference guidelines published before 1 June 2023 into consideration. The grading of recommendations used ("conditional" and "strong") are based on the strength of the evidence. The evidence levels used mutual conversions of SIGN (1++ to 3) to NOGG criteria (Ia to IV).

RESULTS

The guidelines include all aspects associated with osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures, such as secondary causes, prevention, diagnosis, estimation of the 10-year fracture risk using FRAX®, determination of Austria-specific FRAX®-based intervention thresholds, drug-based and non-drug-based treatment options and treatment monitoring. Recommendations for the office-based setting and decision makers and institutions in the Austrian healthcare system consider structured care models and options for osteoporosis-specific screening.

CONCLUSION

The guidelines present comprehensive, evidence-based information and instructions for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is expected that the quality of medical care for patients with this clinical picture will be substantially improved at all levels of the Austrian healthcare system.

The Significance of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Examination in Cushing's Syndrome-A Systematic Review

In recent years, the usefulness of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a valuable complementary method of assessing the content and distribution of adipose and lean tissue as well as bone mineral density and estimating the risk of fractures has been increasingly confirmed. The diagnosis and treatment of Cushing's syndrome remain challenging, and monitoring the effects of treatment is often necessary. DXA tests offer a potential solution to many problems related to the availability of a quick, detailed, and reliable analysis of changes in the content and distribution of individual body composition components. The article discusses total body DXA scans (FMI, VAT, ALMI), lumbar spine scans (VFA, TBS), and osteoporosis scans (BMD, T-score, Z-score)-all are of potential interest in Cushing's syndrome. The article discusses the use of the most important indicators obtained from a DXA test (FMI, VAT, ALMI, BMD, T-score, Z-score, VFA, TBS) and their clinical significance in Cushing's syndrome was verified. The literature from the last decade was used for the study, available in MEDLINE, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect.

Recommendations on the post-acute management of the osteoporotic fracture - Patients with "very-high" Re-fracture risk

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease where there is low bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, leading to an increased risk of a fragility fracture. The aim of this clinical guideline from Fragility Fracture Network Hong Kong SAR, is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the post-acute treatment of the osteoporotic fracture patient that presents for clinical care at the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS). It is now well established that the incidence of a second fracture is especially high after the first 2 years of the initial osteoporotic fracture. Therefore, the recent osteoporotic fracture should be categorized as “very-high” re-fracture risk. Due to the significant number of silent vertebral fractures in the elderly population, it is also recommended that vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) should be incorporated into FLS. This would have diagnostic and treatment implications for the osteoporotic fracture patient. The use of a potent anti-osteoporotic agent, and preferably an anabolic followed by an anti-resorptive agent should be considered, as larger improvements in BMD is strongly associated with a reduction in fractures. Managing other risk factors including falls and sarcopenia are imperative during rehabilitation and prevention of another fracture. Although of low incidence, one should remain vigilant of the atypical femoral fracture. The aging population is increasing worldwide, and it is expected that the treatment of osteoporotic fractures will be routine. The recommendations are anticipated to aid in the daily clinical practice for clinicians.

The Translational potential of this article

Fragility fractures have become a common encounter in clinical practise in the hospital setting. This article provides recommendations on the post-acute management of fragility fracture patients at the FLS.

Osteoporosis in children and young adults

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem with serious long-term complications. In children, the definition of osteoporosis is not only based on densitometric criteria but also takes into account vertebral and long bone fragility fractures. Several factors, such as long-term high-dose steroids, chronic inflammation, malnutrition, immobility, lack of sex steroids, and medication can reduce bone density and increase the risk for fragility fractures when left untreated. Also, genetic conditions can predispose to primary bone fragility disorders, with osteogenesis imperfecta being the most common. Furthermore, since the growing skeleton is at an increased rate of bone remodeling, the ability to heal long bone fractures and reshape vertebral fractures differentiates children from adults. The scope of this chapter is to review the risk factors of osteoporosis and fragility fractures and describe the commonest causes of primary and secondary osteoporosis and their management in children and young adults.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: radiologic diagnosis, clinical and radiologic factors affecting surgical decision making: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations

With the varied literature on osteoporotic vertebral fracture that may predispose to diagnostic and management dilemma, it is timely to evaluate and streamline the evidence. The aim of this review is to create recommendations on osteoporotic vertebral fractures regarding radiologic diagnosis, and clinical and radiological factors affecting surgical decision making. A computerized literature search was done using PubMed, Google scholar and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 2010 to 2020. For radiologic diagnosis, the keywords "osteoporotic vertebral fractures" and "radiologic diagnosis" were used yielding 394 articles (19 relevant articles). For clinical and radiological factors affecting surgical decision making, the keywords "osteoporotic vertebral fractures", "radiologic diagnosis", and "surgery" were used yielding 568 articles (25 relevant articles). All pertinent data were reviewed, and consensus statements were obtained in two virtual separate consensus meetings of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine committee. The statements were voted and yielded positive or negative consensus using the Delphi method. This review summarizes the WFNS Spine Committee recommendations on the radiologic diagnosis, and clinical and radiological factors affecting surgical decision making of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Asymptomatic vertebral fracture in Tunisian post-menopausal women at risk: prevalence and risk factors

Data are still scarce regarding the prevalence and the associated factors of vertebral fractures (VF) in the North Africa and the Middle East region. In this study, VF were common in at risk Tunisian women with a prevalence of 26.19%. Lower total hip T-score, having severe back pain, and being physically inactive were independently associated with VF.

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral fractures are related to a marked increase in morbidity and mortality and they are associated with a definite risk of subsequent fracture. Nevertheless, they remain underdiagnosed and little is known about their epidemiology in the African countries. In this first Tunisian study, we aimed to assess the prevalence and the associated factors of asymptomatic VF among at risk Tunisian post-menopausal women.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we included post-menopausal women without a previous diagnosis of VF and who were referred for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. Each participant had had an extensive medical history investigation, a BMD assessment, and a vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) scan using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. VF were defined using Genant semi-quantitative method.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ten post-menopausal women were included. The overall prevalence of VF was 26.19% and 9.52% of our participants had multiple VF. The prevalence of VF was significantly higher in older participants, those having a history of prior severe fragility fracture, or having at least one intrinsic fall. The percentage of low bone mineral density and osteoporosis were significantly higher in women with VF. After binary logistic regression analysis, severe back pain (OR = 3.016; 95% CI 1.304-6.974), regular physical activity (OR = 0.065; 95% CI 0.02-0.213), and total hip T-score (OR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.383-0.820) were independently associated with VF.

CONCLUSION

VF are very prevalent among at risk Tunisian post-menopausal women and their incorporation in a clinical and densitometric tool might identify more effectively subsequent fracture.

Current Applications and Selected Technical Details of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

The application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examinations in the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine, hip, and forearm is the basic diagnostic method for recognition of osteoporosis. The constant development of DXA technique is due to the aging of societies and the increasing importance of osteoporosis as a public health problem. In order to assess the degree of bone demineralization in patients with hyperparathyroidism, forearm DXA examination is recommended. The vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) of the thoracic and lumbar spine, performed by a highly-skilled technician, is an interesting alternative to the X-ray examination. The DXA total body examination can be useful in the evaluation of fat redistribution among patients after bariatric surgery, in patients infected with HIV and receiving antiretroviral therapy, and in patients with metabolic diseases and suspected to have sarcopenia. The assessment of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and detection of abdominal aortic calcifications may be useful in the prediction of cardiovascular events. The positive effect of anti-resorptive therapy may affect some parameters of DXA hip structure analysis (HSA). Long-term anti-resorptive therapy, especially with the use of bisphosphonates, may result in changes in the DXA image, which may herald atypical femur fractures (AFF). Reduction of the periprosthetic BMD in the DXA measurements can be used to estimate the likelihood of loosening the prosthesis and periprosthetic fractures. The present review aims to present current applications and selected technical details of DXA.

Integrating Muscle Health in Predicting the Risk of Asymptomatic Vertebral Fracture in Older Adults

Background: The utility of muscle health for predicting asymptomatic vertebral fracture (VF) is uncertain. We aimed to determine the effects of muscle health on bone quantity and quality in the older adults and to integrate these factors into a predictive model for VF. Methods: We prospectively recruited participants with a body mass index <37 kg/m². The total lean mass (TLM), appendicular skeletal muscle index, presence of sarcopenia, and bone mineral density were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and bone quality by the trabecular bone score (TBS). VF was diagnosed based on spine radiography. Results: A total of 414 females and 186 males were included; 257 participants had VF. Lower TLM was significantly associated with poorer bone quantity and quality in both males and females. A low TBS (OR: 11.302, p = 0.028) and sarcopenia (Odds ratio (OR): 2.820, p = 0.002) were significant predictors of VF in males, but not bone quantity. Moreover, integrating TBS and sarcopenia into the predictive model improved its performance. Conclusions: Although TLM was associated with bone quantity and quality in both sexes, sarcopenia and a low TBS were significant predictors of asymptomatic VF only in male participants.

Vertebral fracture: epidemiology, impact and use of DXA vertebral fracture assessment in fracture liaison services

Vertebral fractures are independent risk factors for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Since vertebral fractures are often missed, the relatively new introduction of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for imaging of the lateral spine during DXA-measurement of the spine and hips may contribute to detect vertebral fractures. We advocate performing a VFA in all patients with a recent fracture visiting a fracture liaison service (FLS). Fracture liaison services (FLS) are important service models for delivering secondary fracture prevention for older adults presenting with a fragility fracture. While commonly age, clinical risk factors (including fracture site and number of prior fracture) and BMD play a crucial role in determining fracture risk and indications for treatment with antiosteoporosis medications, prevalent vertebral fractures usually remain undetected. However, vertebral fractures are important independent risk factors for future vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. A development of the DXA technology, vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), allows for assessment of the lateral spine during the regular DXA bone mineral density measurement of the lumbar spine and hips. Recent approaches to the stratification of antiosteoporosis medication type according to baseline fracture risk, and differences by age in the indication for treatment by prior fracture mean that additional information from VFA may influence initiation and type of treatment. Furthermore, knowledge of baseline vertebral fractures allows reliable definition of incident vertebral fracture events during treatment, which may modify the approach to therapy. In this manuscript, we will discuss the epidemiology and clinical significance of vertebral fractures, the different methods of detecting vertebral fractures, and the rationale for, and implications of, use of VFA routinely in FLS. • Vertebral fracture assessment is a tool available on modern DXA instruments and has proven ability to detect vertebral fractures, the majority of which occur without a fall and without the signs and symptoms of an acute fracture. • Most osteoporosis guidelines internationally suggest that treatment with antiosteoporosis medications should be considered for older individuals (e.g., 65 years +) with a recent low trauma fracture without the need for DXA. • Younger individuals postfracture may be risk-assessed on the basis of FRAX® probability including DXA and associated treatment thresholds. • Future fracture risk is markedly influenced by both site, number, severity, and recency of prior fracture; awareness of baseline vertebral fractures facilitates definition of true incident vertebral fracture events occurring during antiosteoporosis treatment. • Detection of previously clinically silent vertebral fractures, defining site of prior fracture, might alter treatment decisions in younger or older FLS patients, consistent with recent IOF-ESCEO guidance on baseline-risk-stratified therapy, and provides a reliable baseline from which to define new, potentially therapy-altering, vertebral fracture events.

Comparison of the Characteristics of Back Pain in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis with and without Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Retrospective Study at a Single Osteoporosis Center in Poland

Background

The incidence of unspecific back pain and osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures increases significantly with age. Considering the difficulties in the diagnosis of spontaneous osteoporotic vertebral fractures, this retrospective study aimed to compare the characteristics of back pain in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis with and without vertebral compression fractures.

Material/Methods

This study enrolled 334 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis; 150 had vertebral fractures, and 184 had no vertebral fractures. Densitometric vertebral fracture assessment and bone mineral density measurements in the central skeleton were performed for each patient. The participants completed a survey about features of their back pain.

Results

Patients with vertebral fractures had more severe back pain based on the numeric rating scale: 6.14 vs 4.33 (P<0.001, odds ratio [OR]=1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29–1.59). Among these individuals, back pain caused reduction in normal activity during the day (P<0.001, OR=4.68, 95% CI: 2.86–7.68), and pain occurred more often (P<0.001, OR=1.77, 95% CI: 1.47–2.13), lasted longer (P<0.001, OR=2.01, 95% CI: 1.65–2.46), predominantly occurred in the lumbar spine (P<0.001, OR=4.70, 95% CI: 1.96–11.29), and intensified during normal everyday activities (P<0.001). Based on these results, a new survey was created. It demonstrated a sensitivity of 70.67% and a specificity of 67.37% in predicting a current compression fracture.

Conclusions

Patients with vertebral compression fractures experience higher pain intensity and exhibit specific features of back pain. The new survey can be considered a supportive tool in assessing the possibility of vertebral compression fractures.

Management of primary and secondary osteoporosis in children

Osteoporosis in children differs from adults in terms of definition, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment options. Primary osteoporosis comprises primarily of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), but there are significant other causes of bone fragility in children that require treatment. Secondary osteoporosis can be a result of muscle disuse, iatrogenic causes, such as steroids, chronic inflammation, delayed or arrested puberty and thalassaemia major. Investigations involve bone biochemistry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan for bone densitometry and vertebral fracture assessment, radiographic assessment of the spine and, in some cases, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) or peripheral QCT. It is important that bone mineral density (BMD) results are adjusted based on age, gender and height, in order to reflect size corrections in children. Genetics are being used increasingly for the diagnosis and classification of various cases of primary osteoporosis. Bone turnover markers are used less frequently in children, but can be helpful in monitoring treatment and transiliac bone biopsy can assist in the diagnosis of atypical cases of osteoporosis. The management of children with osteoporosis requires a multidisciplinary team of health professionals with expertise in paediatric bone disease. The prevention and treatment of fragility fractures and improvement of the quality of life of patients are important aims of a specialised service. The drugs used most commonly in children are bisphosphonates, that, with timely treatment, can give good results in improving BMD and reshaping vertebral fractures. The data regarding their effect on reducing long bone fractures are equivocal. Denosumab is being used increasingly for various conditions with mixed results. There are more drugs trialled in adults, but these are not yet licenced for children. Increasing awareness of risk factors for paediatric osteoporosis, screening and referral to a specialist team for appropriate management can lead to early detection and treatment of asymptomatic fractures and prevention of further bone damage.

Grade 1 Vertebral Fractures Identified by Densitometric Lateral Spine Imaging Predict Incident Major Osteoporotic Fracture Independently of Clinical Risk Factors and Bone Mineral Density in Older Women

Because prevalent vertebral fracture (VF) is a strong predictor of future fractures, they are important to identify in clinical practice as osteoporosis medications are effective and can be used to reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with VF. Lateral spine imaging (LSI) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can be used to diagnose VFs accurately but is not widespread in clinical practice. The prognostic value of grade 1 (20% to 25% compression) VFs diagnosed by LSI with DXA has been insufficiently studied. The aim of this study was to determine if grade 1 VF is associated with incident fracture in older women. Sahlgrenska University Hospital Prospective Evaluation of Risk of Bone Fractures (SUPERB) is a population-based study of 3028 older women from Gothenburg, Sweden. Included women were 75 to 80 years of age at baseline, answered questionnaires, and were scanned with DXA (Discovery A, Hologic, Waltham, MA, USA). LSI was used to diagnose VFs, which were classified using the Genant semiquantitative method. Cox regression models were used to estimate the association between VFs at baseline and X-ray-verified incident fractures, with adjustment for confounders. Women with a grade 1 VF (n = 264) or a grade 2-3 VF (n = 349) were compared with women without any fracture (n = 1482). During 3.6 years (median, interquartile range [IQR] 1.5 years) of follow-up, 260 women had any incident fracture and 213 a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). Women with only grade 1 VF had increased risk of any fracture (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-2.36) and MOF (HR = 1.86; 95% CI 1.28-2.72). For MOF, this association remained after adjustment for clinical risk factors and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). In conclusion, grade 1 VFs were associated with incident MOF, also after adjustment for clinical risk factors and BMD, indicating that all VF identified by DXA should be considered in the evaluation of fracture risk in older women. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by American Society for Bone and Mineral Research..

Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures using Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women, although most VFs are subclinical. Prevalent VFs are a significant predictor of subsequent fracture and therefore, identification of VF improves the identification of those with high fracture risk. The aim of present study was to systematically review the literature that assessed the prevalence of VF in asymptomatic postmenopausal women, using Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

METHOD

Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched between Jan 1st, 2000 and Jan 31st, 2018, for publications in English that reported the prevalence of VFA-detected VF in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. We also searched for reports, conference papers and grey literature. Reviewers screened studies for eligibility and extracted data for included studies. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate the prevalence of VF. The presence of publication bias was assessed using funnel plots by precision and Egger's Test of the Intercept.

RESULTS

A total of 1777 articles were identified, 94 studies were fully reviewed and 28 studies (n = 25,418) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. More than two thirds of the studies were cross-sectional and the sample size varied widely across the studies (from 63 to 5156). The mean age ranged from 59.5 to 86.2 years old. The prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia varied between 6-57.0% and 25.1-58.9%, respectively. However, among women who had prevalent VFs, up to 43% had osteopenia and as many as 32% had normal bone density. The weighted pooled prevalence of VFA-detected VF in asymptomatic women was 28% (95% CI: 23%-32%).

CONCLUSION

VFA is able to identify prevalent VF in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. The use of VFA identified an average of 28% of asymptomatic women with VFs, many of whom did not have a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Implementation of VFA as a routine screening tool may detect high risk women. Detection of VF might lead to pharmacological treatment in individuals who may not otherwise be treated.

Guidelines for the management of osteoporosis and fragility fractures

The purpose of this document, a result of the harmonisation and revision of Guidelines published separately by the SIMFER, SIOMMMS/SIR, and SIOT associations, is to provide practical indications based on specific levels of evidence and various grades of recommendations, drawn from available literature, for the management of osteoporosis and for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of fragility fractures. These indications were discussed and formally approved by the delegates of the Italian Scientific Associations involved in the project (SIE, SIGG, SIMFER, SIMG, SIMI, SIOMMMS, SIR, and SIOT).

Diagnosis of vertebral deformities on chest CT and DXA compared to routine lateral thoracic spine X-ray

X-ray, CT and DXA enable diagnosis of vertebral deformities. For this study, level of agreement of vertebral deformity diagnosis was analysed. We showed that especially on subject level, these imaging techniques could be used for opportunistic screening of vertebral deformities in COPD patients.

INTRODUCTION

X-ray and CT are frequently used for pulmonary evaluation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and also enable to diagnose vertebral deformities together with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) imaging. The aim of this research was to study the level of agreement of these imaging modalities for diagnosis of vertebral deformities from T4 to L1.

METHODS

Eighty-seven subjects (mean age of 65; 50 males; 57 COPD patients) who had X-ray, chest CT (CCT) and DXA were included. Evaluable vertebrae were scored twice using SpineAnalyzer™ software. ICCs and kappas were calculated to examine intra-observer variability. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated to compare vertebral deformities diagnosed on the different imaging modalities.

RESULTS

ICCs for height measurements were excellent (> 0.94). Kappas were good to excellent (0.64-0.77). At vertebral level, the AUROC was 0.85 for CCT vs. X-ray, 0.74 for DXA vs. X-ray and 0.77 for DXA vs. CCT. Sensitivity (51%-73%) and PPV (57%-70%) were fair to good; specificity and NPV were excellent (≥ 96%). At subject level, the AUROC values were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of height measurements of vertebrae is excellent with all three imaging modalities. On subject level, diagnostic performance of CT (PPV 79-82%; NPV 90-93%), and to a slightly lesser extend of DXA (PPV 73-77%; NPV 80-89%), indicates that these imaging techniques could be used for opportunistic screening of vertebral deformities in COPD patients.

Value and potential limitations of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) compared to conventional spine radiography: experience from a fracture liaison service (FLS) and a meta-analysis

We evaluated the value of VFA in the identification of vertebral fractures using a retrospective study and a meta-analysis. Performance of VFA was adequate in the meta-analysis although this was not demonstrated in our centre. We recommend checking the performance of VFA tools before exclusively relying on this tool.

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral fractures are traditionally diagnosed using conventional radiographs of the spine. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) has been advocated as an alternative tool in the diagnosis of these fractures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study as well as a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of VFA compared to conventional spinal radiography in patients who had sustained a fracture and thus at risk for osteoporosis. A risk of bias analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

The diagnostic study included 542 patients (25% male) with fractures. The sensitivity of low-radiation VFA to detect a patient with a vertebral fracture ≥ Genant grade 2 was 0.77 and its specificity 0.80. Two hundred ninety-seven (55%) patients had ≥1 and 135(25%) ≥3 unevaluable vertebrae. The systematic review identified 16 studies including a total of 3238 subjects (19% male) with a mean age range of 45 to 74 years. Seven studies had a low risk of bias and 9 had an intermediate risk, mainly due to not consecutively including patients. The pooled sensitivity of VFA to detect a patient with a vertebral fracture ≥Genant grade 2 was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72-0.92) and specificity 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings from the meta-analysis suggest an adequate performance of VFA for the detection of vertebral fractures. However, we could not demonstrate these findings in our center, especially the specificity. Our data advocate caution with exclusively relying on VFA in the assessment of vertebral fractures without identifying performance and potential limitations of the technique.

Are bilateral decubitus views necessary in assessing for vertebral compression fractures using DXA vertebral fracture assessment?

The purpose of this study is to assess the differences in VFA diagnostic accuracy when using bilateral decubitus views and whether diagnostic accuracy is affected by scoliosis. Our findings show that the current practice of performing only one side is valid; however, bilateral views can improve specificity in scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION

The diagnostic accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) can be influenced by poor patient position and scoliosis. This study aims to assess the differences in VFA diagnostic accuracy for right and left lateral decubitus views and the effect of scoliosis.

METHODS

One hundred fourteen postmenopausal women received right and left lateral thoracolumbar spine dual-energy VFA and radiography. Cobb angles were measured from the posteroanterior absorptiometry image, and lumbar spine radiography was the standard reference for vertebral fracture and also provides the levels investigated. McNemar's test was used to compare accuracy between the two decubitus position and Fisher's exact test was used for patients with and without scoliosis.

RESULTS

Forty-two vertebral fractures (VFs) were identified. There was no significant difference in sensitivity (p = 0.125) or specificity (p = 0.866) between the left lateral decubitus (64.3, 97.2%) and right lateral decubitus (76.2, 91.1%), respectively, views. Scoliotic patients had a significantly worse specificity (92.7 vs 98.1%, p = 0.003) than patients without scoliosis; however, a combination of both decubitus positions significantly improved specificity (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Right and left side lateral decubitus views have excellent agreement with radiography and similar diagnostic accuracy in the detection of VFs. Thus, the current practice of performing only one side is valid. With scoliosis, bilateral decubitus views can improve the specificity of detecting VF; however, this would increase radiation dose.

Vertebral fracture assessment by DXA is inferior to X-ray in clinical severe osteoporosis

Spine fractures are diagnosed by X-ray or vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning. The use of VFA evaluation by DXA is still debated. We demonstrate that VFA is inferior relative to X-ray in visualizing vertebrae properly in the upper spine and therefore with a reduced diagnostic performance in detecting fractures.

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA has been evaluated for many years, and its use in clinical practice is still debated. In a cross-sectional setting, we aimed to compare VFA with traditional radiography in vertebral fracture (VF) diagnosis in severe osteoporotic patient.

METHODS

A total of 207 patients referred to the outpatient clinic for teriparatide treatment were screened, out of whom 35 (16.9 %) severe osteoporotic patients were identified (mean age 67.5 ± 11.3 years and median T-score -3.2 interquartile range (IQR) (-1.9 to -3.7). VF diagnosis was performed independently using VFA and X-ray in accordance with the semiquantitative (SQ) approach. The same technician performed the primary interpretation on both sets of images, after which a radiologist and an endocrinologist reviewed the evaluation for a conclusive judgement.

RESULTS

In total, 180 radiographic fractures were detected, corresponding to 5.1 fractures per individual. Using VFA, 18.5 % of vertebrae were considered unreadable, compared to 2.0 % on X-ray. The accuracy of VFA in VF detection using X-ray as a reference resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 75.5 and 86.7 %, respectively. Sensitivity decreased from the lumbar to thoracic level. Nevertheless, VFA only identified fractures consistently between Th11 and L3.

CONCLUSION

Our data, based on a severe osteoporotic population, demonstrate that VFA is inferior relative to X-ray in visualizing vertebrae properly in the upper spine, resulting in vertebrae not being assessable for analysis and a reduced diagnostic performance in detecting fractures. Improvements in DXA techniques are needed for it to be comparable with X-ray in VF diagnosis.

A systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in postmenopausal women and elderly men

This systematic review was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) with that of spinal radiography for identification of vertebral fractures (VFs). VFA appeared to have moderate sensitivity and high specificity for detecting VFs when compared with spinal radiography.

INTRODUCTION

VFs are recognized as the hallmark of osteoporosis, and a previous VF increases the risk of a future fracture. Therefore, the timely detection of VFs is important for prevention of further fractures. This systematic review examined the diagnostic accuracy of VFA using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to identify VFs.

METHODS

We searched for potentially relevant studies using electronic databases, including Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, Cochrane library, and four Korean databases, from their inception to May 2013. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of VFA with that of spinal radiography for detection of VFs by analyzing the sensitivity and specificity using a 2 × 2 contingency table. Subgroup analyses were also performed on studies with a low risk of bias and applicability.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were analyzed for the diagnostic accuracy of VFA. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.70-0.93 and 0.95-1.00, respectively, analyzed on a per-vertebra basis, and 0.65-1.00 and 0.74-1.00 on a per-patient basis. The sensitivity and specificity of five studies in subgroups with a low risk of bias in the intervention test were 0.70-0.84 and 0.96-0.99, respectively. In studies with a low risk of bias in the patient selection, those based on a per-vertebra basis in three studies were 0.70-0.93 and 0.96-1.00, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VFA had moderate sensitivity and high specificity for detecting VF when compared with spinal radiography. However, the present findings are insufficient to assess whether spinal radiography should be replaced by VFA.

Accuracy of densitometric vertebral fracture assessment when performed by DXA technicians--a cross-sectional, multiobserver study

Six dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technicians reviewed lateral images of the spine for deformed vertebrae. The images were acquired with a DXA scanner in 235 patients referred for osteoporosis assessment. The outcome was compared to findings on spinal radiographs assessed by two radiologists. Three DXA technicians performed acceptable or better in identifying patients with fractured vertebrae.

INTRODUCTION

This is the first study to evaluate the accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) when used by DXA technicians as a triage test to select patients with deformed vertebrae for spinal radiographs.

METHODS

Lateral single-energy scans and radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine (T4-L4) were acquired in 235 patients aged 65 years or more referred for osteoporosis assessment. Six DXA technicians evaluated lateral scans using dedicated software. The DXA technicians were trained to identify deformed vertebrae, but they did not assess the aetiology of deformity. Two radiologists evaluated the radiographs and their consensus evaluation served as the reference test for vertebral fracture. The main outcome was sensitivity and specificity of the DXA technicians' identification of patients with one or more grade II-III deformities according to Genant's classification.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with one or more grade II-III vertebral fractures was 0.35. Sensitivity ranged from 0.61 to 0.83 and specificity ranged from 0.78 to 0.95 across the DXA technicians. In patients with grade II-III deformities on VFA, the mean probability of one or more grade II-III fractures was 0.74 (range 0.66-0.86). Conversely, in patients without such deformities, the mean probability of grade II-III fractures was 0.14 (range 0.10-0.18). Accuracy was lower for grade I-III deformities for all the DXA technicians.

CONCLUSION

Three of six DXA technicians achieved acceptable or better accuracy when using VFA to triage patients with grade II-III vertebral deformities for spinal radiographs. Heterogeneity between DXA technicians appears to be due to differences in subjective thresholds. VFA triage by DXA technicians to identify patients with grade II-III fractures is feasible.

A critical appraisal of vertebral fracture assessment in paediatrics

PURPOSE

There is a need to improve our understanding of the clinical utility of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in paediatrics and this requires a thorough evaluation of its readability, reproducibility, and accuracy for identifying VF.

METHODS

VFA was performed independently by two observers, in 165 children and adolescents with a median age of 13.4 years (range, 3.6, 18). In 20 of these subjects, VFA was compared to lateral vertebral morphometry assessment on lateral spine X-ray (LVM).

RESULTS

1528 (84%) of the vertebrae were adequately visualised by both observers for VFA. Interobserver agreement in vertebral readability was 94% (kappa, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68, 0.73]). 93% of the non-readable vertebrae were located between T6 and T9. Interobserver agreement per-vertebra for the presence of VF was 99% (kappa, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.79, 0.91]). Interobserver agreement per-subject was 91% (kappa, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66, 0.87]). Per-vertebra agreement between LVM and VFA was 95% (kappa 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62, 0.92]) and per-subject agreement was 95% (kappa, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.58, 1.0]). Accepting LVM as the gold standard, VFA had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95% in per-vertebra analysis and a PPV of 100% and NPV of 93% in per-subject analysis.

CONCLUSION

VFA reaches an excellent level of agreement between observers and a high level of accuracy in identifying VF in a paediatric population. The readability of vertebrae at the mid thoracic region is suboptimal and interpretation at this level should be exercised with caution.

Lifetime, untreated isolated GH deficiency due to a GH-releasing hormone receptor mutation has beneficial consequences on bone status in older individuals, and does not influence their abdominal aorta calcification

The GH/IGF-I axis has essential roles in regulating bone and vascular status. The age-related decrease in GH secretion ("somatopause") may contribute to osteoporosis and atherosclerosis, commonly observed in the elderly. Adult-onset GH deficiency (GHD) has been reported to be associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD), increased risk of fractures, and premature atherosclerosis. We have shown the young adult individuals with isolated GHD (IGHD) due to a homozygous for the c.57+1G>A GHRH receptor gene mutation have normal volumetric BMD (vBMD), and not develop premature atherosclerosis, despite adverse risk factor profile. However, the bone and vascular impact of lifetime GHD on the aging process remains unknown. We studied a group of ten older IGHD subjects (≥60 years) homozygous for the mutation, comparing them with 20 age- and gender-matched controls (CO). Areal BMD was measured, and vBMD was calculated at the lumbar spine and total hip. Vertebral fractures and abdominal aortic calcifications (expressed as calcium score) were also assessed. Areal BMD was lower in IGHD, but vBMD was similar in the two groups. The percent of fractured individuals was similar, but the mean number of fractures per individual was lower in IGHD than CO. Calcium score was similar in the two groups. A positive correlation was found between calcium score and number of fractures. Untreated lifetime IGHD has beneficial consequences on bone status and does not have a deleterious effect on abdominal aorta calcification.

Comprehensive vertebral deformity and vertebral fracture assessment in clinical practice: intra- and inter-reader agreement of a clinical workflow tool

STUDY DESIGN

Study design randomized intra- and inter-reader reproducibility study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate reproducibility of quantitative morphometry (QM) and agreement of dichotomous fracture/no-fracture status on lateral spinal radiographs acquired during routine clinical practice using a clinical workflow tool.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several recent guidelines have underlined the importance of Genant semi-quantitative scoring and selective QM to confirm and grade suspected vertebral fractures in clinical practice.

METHODS

Thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were acquired from 98 consecutive subjects (mean age, 60.1 ± 11.7 yr) attending the clinic for osteoporosis evaluation. For each subject, QM and Genant semi-quantitative scoring were performed on all evaluable vertebrae from L4 to T4 using a software workflow tool. A radiologist and an experienced radiographical technician performed 2 repeat reading sessions of the radiographs 12 months apart, blinded to each other's results; for the second read, the cases were anonymized and the order was randomized.

RESULTS

Inter-reader reproducibility results were 3.1% and 3.2% coefficient of variation (%) for heights, 0.030 and 0.031 root mean square standard deviation for height ratios. For intrareader reproducibility, these values were 2.2% and 3.5% coefficient of variation %; 0.023 and 0.034 root mean square standard deviation. Kappa score results for agreement of dichotomous fracture/no-fracture status were 0.67 and 0.72 (inter-rater) and 0.50 and 0.67 (intrarater).

CONCLUSION

The software assessed in this study is a reliable clinical tool that facilitates QM and Genant semi-quantitative scoring of the spine in routine clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.