1
|
Ren Y, Yu Y, Xu K, Li Z, Wang X. Meta-Analysis of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of PMRT. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48:1940-1948. [PMID: 37380747 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03430-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is still a controversial debate that which type of immediate breast reconstruction should be operated on breast cancer patients in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy. This meta-analysis compared incidence of complications requiring reoperation (CRR), reconstruction failure (RF) and patient-reported outcome between immediate autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), tissue expander/implant reconstruction mostly, in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy. METHODS Systematic and thorough research was conducted to search for studies published before August 1, 2022, by using three online databases. Studies that covered complications or reconstruction failure between two cohorts were included. To evaluate the possible bias in the included studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied. RESULTS Eight studies presenting 1261 patients were enrolled. The relative risk associated with reconstructive failure favored IBBR (RR = 8.61; 95% CI, 2.84-26.08; P = 0.0001). While the risk for complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between two groups, either include reconstruction failure (RR = 1.45 95% CI, 0.82-2.55; P = 0.20) or not (RR = 0.63 95% CI, 0.28-1.43; P = 0.27). However, because statistical definitions and methodologies vary, the synthesized result should be taken critically. CONCLUSION Patients with IBBR have more possibility experiencing RF compared that with ABR, while the chance for CRR is not that different between two groups. For the purpose of clinical practice refinement, more high-quality studies are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanxin Ren
- Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050018, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Yu
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Kexin Xu
- Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050018, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhoujian Li
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
- Hebei North University, Shijiazhuang, 075000, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dai L, Cui H, Bao Y, Hu L, Zhou Z, Lin S, Zhang X, Wu H, Kang H, Ma X. Prognostic effect of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients underwent immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1010088. [PMID: 36408183 PMCID: PMC9667104 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1010088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is still unclear whether radiotherapy affects the long-term survival of breast cancer (BC) patients after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). This study aims to evaluate the actual prognostic impact of radiotherapy on BC patients undergoing IBR, and to construct survival prediction models to predict the survival benefit of radiotherapy. METHODS Data on eligible BC patients were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Competing risk models were used to assess breast cause-specific death (BCSD) and non-breast cancer cause-specific death (NBCSD). Kaplan-Meier curve, Cox risk regression model and forest map were used to evaluate and demonstrate overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Survival prediction nomograms were used to predict OS and BCSS probabilities. RESULTS A total of 22,218 patients were selected, 24.9% received radiotherapy and 75.1% were without radiotherapy. Competing risk models showed that whether BCSD or NBCSD, the cumulative long-term risk of death in the radiotherapy group was higher than that in the non-radiotherapy group. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that patients with different lymph node metastasis had different radiotherapy benefits. Multivariate stratified analysis showed that radiotherapy after autologous reconstruction was associated with poor BCSS in patients with stage N0, and radiotherapy after autologous reconstruction and combined reconstruction improved OS and BCSS in patients with stage N3. The C-indexes of nomogram (between 0.778 and 0.847) and calibration curves showed the good prediction ability of survival prediction model. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy can improve OS and BCSS in N3 stage BC patients undergoing immediate autologous reconstruction after mastectomy. The practical nomograms can be used to predict OS and BCSS of patients with or without radiotherapy, which is helpful for individualized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luyao Dai
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hanxiao Cui
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yuanhang Bao
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Liqun Hu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhangjian Zhou
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shuai Lin
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hao Wu
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi’an Key Laboratory of Immune Related Diseases, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China,*Correspondence: Hao Wu, ; Huafeng Kang, ; Xiaobin Ma,
| | - Huafeng Kang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China,*Correspondence: Hao Wu, ; Huafeng Kang, ; Xiaobin Ma,
| | - Xiaobin Ma
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China,*Correspondence: Hao Wu, ; Huafeng Kang, ; Xiaobin Ma,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Comparison between two packages for pectoral muscle removal on mammographic images. Radiol Med 2022; 127:848-856. [PMID: 35816260 PMCID: PMC9349098 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01521-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Pectoral muscle removal is a fundamental preliminary step in computer-aided diagnosis systems for full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Currently, two open-source publicly available packages (LIBRA and OpenBreast) provide algorithms for pectoral muscle removal within Matlab environment. Purpose To compare performance of the two packages on a single database of FFDM images. Methods Only mediolateral oblique (MLO) FFDM was considered because of large presence of pectoral muscle on this type of projection. For obtaining ground truth, pectoral muscle has been manually segmented by two radiologists in consensus. Both LIBRA’s and OpenBreast’s removal performance with respect to ground truth were compared using Dice similarity coefficient and Cohen-kappa reliability coefficient; Wilcoxon signed-rank test has been used for assessing differences in performances; Kruskal–Wallis test has been used to verify possible dependence of the performance from the breast density or image laterality. Results FFDMs from 168 consecutive women at our institution have been included in the study. Both LIBRA’s Dice-index and Cohen-kappa were significantly higher than OpenBreast (Wilcoxon signed-rank test P < 0.05). No dependence on breast density or laterality has been found (Kruskal–Wallis test P > 0.05). Conclusion: Libra has a better performance than OpenBreast in pectoral muscle delineation so that, although our study has not a direct clinical application, these results are useful in the choice of packages for the development of complex systems for computer-aided breast evaluation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Karaman N, Bahcecitapar M, Ozaslan C. Oncoplastic Level II Surgical Techniques for Breast Cancer Treatment: Long-Term Outcomes. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:24-30. [PMID: 35355700 PMCID: PMC8914188 DOI: 10.1159/000514468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Problems in patients who could not get adequate surgical margins (SM) and good cosmetic results with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) have been overcome with the introduction of oncoplastic surgery (OPS) methods. The purpose of this study was the documentation of level II techniques and the presentation of long-term survival results. Methods The data on patients who had been prospectively registered in the database between 2007 and 2017 and who had been treated with level II OPS due to invasive breast cancer were examined. Results A total of 1,074 patients were included in the study. The most commonly applied level II oncoplastic techniques were performed in the upper outer quadrantectomy with racquet incision in 334 (31%) patients, inferior pedicle flaps in 294 (27.3%), and vertical mammoplasty in 140 (13%). Reexcision was performed in 96 patients (8.9%). Total breast conservation rate was 96%. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 88%, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) 93.6%, and overall survival (OS) 96%. Ten-year DFS was 72%, LRFS 85.4%, and OS 90.2%. Conclusion Level II OPS techniques have low reoperation and complication rates and a high rate of breast protection. The success of these techniques has been demonstrated in terms of long-term local control. Awareness of the fact that many patients who undergo OPS will not lose their breasts should be created, and regular training programs for OPS techniques should be conducted especially in developing countries. By revealing these results, it is hoped that the OPS and breast conservation rates will increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Ali Gulcelik
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Lutfi Dogan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey,*Lutfi Dogan, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06200 (Turkey),
| | - Niyazi Karaman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Melike Bahcecitapar
- Department of Statistics, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Science, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cihangir Ozaslan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Surgical and Satisfaction Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3910. [PMID: 34765389 PMCID: PMC8575424 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Adjuvant radiotherapy could be a necessary step in the oncological treatment for breast cancer. However, radiotherapy may have negative effects on implant-based immediate breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on surgical results and patient-reported satisfaction outcomes in women undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A systematic search in PubMed was conducted on September 2019 and updated on April 2021. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Observational Studies. RevMan 5 was used for statistical analysis. We obtained relative risks to determine the complication incidence and mean differences for 2-year BREAST-Q scores. Results Fourteen studies were included. A total of 11,958 implant-based immediate reconstructions were performed, 2311 received postmastectomy radiation therapy, and 9647 were considered as control group. Surgical complications, reoperation rates, and reconstruction failure were significantly higher among irradiated breasts. Significantly lower BREAST-Q scores were reported by irradiated women receiving radiotherapy. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis combines reconstruction complication rates with aesthetic and patient-reported satisfaction outcomes. Adjuvant radiotherapy is consistently associated with greater complication rates and poorer aesthetic and satisfaction outcomes. The magnitude of association is significantly lower when the reconstruction is based on autologous tissues.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bellardita L, Colciago RR, Frasca S, De Santis MC, Gay S, Palorini F, La Rocca E, Valdagni R, Rancati T, Lozza L. Breast cancer patient perspective on opportunities and challenges of a genetic test aimed to predict radio-induced side effects before treatment: Analysis of the Italian branch of the REQUITE project. Radiol Med 2021; 126:1366-1373. [PMID: 34268681 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01395-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM To explore breast cancer patient's perspective on future genetic testing for prediction of toxicity after breast radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study involved patient enrolled in the Italian branch of the REQUITE project conducted at the National Cancer Institute in Milan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted within one month from the end of radiotherapy treatment by two radiation oncologists and a radiotherapy technician previously trained by a clinical psychologist with experience in the oncology field. Semi-structured interviews are characterized by a set of pre-defined questions and developed ad hoc by researchers in Leicester within the REQUITE project. The interview questions investigated interest in undergoing the genetic test and expectations on its usefulness and disadvantages. RESULTS Eighteen interviews were conducted and analysed. Forty-five initial codes were combined into nine themes which were then clustered in two main macro-areas (i) Opportunities and (ii) Challenges. Overall, all patients understand the aim of the genetic test and considered its intrinsic opportunity to make the physician more confident with the treatment. Regarding side effects, most of patients felt prepared to RT but not without fear. Many women considered important to have the largest and reliable information, also about negative experiences. Prevailing emotions were anxiety and fear but not connected to genetic test's result. CONCLUSIONS A genetic test could be an opportunity because generate knowledge and give patients a dynamic role in the decision-making approach. Prediction of single patient radiosensitivity before RT could prompt suggestion to entail a more and more tailored radiation treatment in the era of personalized approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Bellardita
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sarah Frasca
- Radiation Oncology 1 Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Simona Gay
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Palorini
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Eliana La Rocca
- Radiation Oncology 1 Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Radiotherapy, Università Degli Studi Di Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,Radiation Oncology 1 Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Lozza
- Radiation Oncology 1 Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meattini I, Becherini C, Bernini M, Bonzano E, Criscitiello C, De Rose F, De Santis MC, Fontana A, Franco P, Gentilini OD, Livi L, Meduri B, Parisi S, Pasinetti N, Prisco A, Rocco N. Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy: An Italian expert Delphi consensus statements and critical review. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 99:102236. [PMID: 34126314 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Breast conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiation therapy (RT) or mastectomy have shown comparable oncological outcomes in early-stage breast cancer and are considered standard of care treatments. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) targeted to both the chest wall and regional lymph nodes is recommended in high-risk patients. Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS) represents a significant recent improvement in breast surgery. Nevertheless, it represents a challenge for radiation oncologists as it triggers different decision-making strategies related to treatment volume definition and target delineation. Hence, the choice of the best combination and timing when offering RT to breast cancer patients who underwent or are planned to undergo reconstruction procedures should be carefully evaluated and based on individual considerations. We present an Italian expert Delphi Consensus statements and critical review, led by a core group of all the professional profiles involved in the management of breast cancer patients undergoing reconstructive procedures and RT. The report was structured as to consider the main recommendations on breast reconstruction and RT and analyse the current open issues deserving investigation and consensus. We used a three key-phases and a Delphi process. The final expert panel of 40 colleagues selected key topics as identified by the core group of the project. A final consensus on 26 key statements on RT and breast reconstruction after three rounds of the Delphi voting process and harmonisation was reached. An accompanying critical review of available literature was summarized. A clear communication and cooperation between surgeon and radiation oncologist is of paramount relevance both in the setting of breast reconstruction following mastectomy when PMRT is planned and when extensive glandular rearrangements as OBCS is performed. A shared-decision making, relying on outcome-based and patient-centred considerations, is essential, while waiting for higher level-of-evidence data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy.
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Marco Bernini
- Breast Surgery Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Bonzano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Foundation & PhD School in Experimental Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Department of Oncology and Haematology (DIPO), University of Milan & Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Maria Carmen De Santis
- Radiation Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Antonella Fontana
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Latina, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont & Radiation Oncology Unit, AOU "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Silvana Parisi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Radiation Oncology Service, ASST Valcamonica, Esine, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Agnese Prisco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, ASUFC, Udine, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Nicola Rocco
- Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements (G.RE.T.A.), Milan, Naples, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Quilichini O, Barrou J, Bannier M, Rua S, Van Troy A, Sabiani L, Lambaudie E, Cohen M, Houvenaeghel G. Mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: Results of a mono-centric 4-years cohort. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020; 61:172-179. [PMID: 33437474 PMCID: PMC7787913 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Oncological safety, quality of life and cosmetic outcomes seems to be similar between breast conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). We report our experience of IBR for consecutive mastectomies realized in a recent period of four years in order to determined immediate surgical results according to type of mastectomy and type of reconstruction, as mains objectives. Methods All mastectomies with IBR during years 2016–2019 were included. A retrospective analysis with prospective data collection was performed. Results We analyzed 748 IBR: 353 nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM), 391 skin-sparing mastectomies (SSM) and 4 standard mastectomies, 551 with definitive implant or expanders and 196 with latissimus dorsi-flap (LDF). More NSM were performed during the 2 last years and more LDF were performed for high BMI, high breast cup-size, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy and local recurrence. We realized 111 robotic NSM and 125 robotic LDF. Longer duration of surgery was significantly associated with the robotic procedures. The overall complications crude rate was 31.4% with 9.9% of re-operations and 5.8% of implant loss. Grade 2–3 complications were significantly associated with smoking. Breast complications occurred in 32.9% of mastectomies with principally skin or nipple-areola-complex suffering or necrosis, hematomas and infections. A predictive score was determined to evaluate risk of complications before surgery. Conclusion Mastectomy with IBR seems to be a safe technique with an acceptable complication rate which is increased by tobacco use, high breast cup-size and IBR-type. Mastectomy with immediate breast to determined immediate surgical results. More Nipple Sparing Mastectomy performed during the 2 last years. More Latissimus dorsi-flap performed for high BMI, high breast cup-size, after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Quilichini
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Julien Barrou
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Marie Bannier
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Sandrine Rua
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Aurore Van Troy
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Laura Sabiani
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Monique Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Department of Surgery, Paoli Calmettes Institute & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pereira ST, Silva CR, Nuñez SC, Ribeiro MS. Safety and Clinical Impact of a Single Red Light Irradiation on Breast Tumor-Bearing Mice. Photochem Photobiol 2020; 97:435-442. [PMID: 33011980 DOI: 10.1111/php.13338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Low-level light therapy has been used in health care as a therapeutic strategy for different diseases. However, its effects on cancer are controversial. This work evaluated the effects of three energies on breast cancer-bearing mice after a single red light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation. 4T1 cells were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of female BALB/c mice. When tumor volume reached 100 mm3 , animals were irradiated by a LED irradiator (660 ± 11 nm) with energies of 1.2, 3.6, and 6.0 J. Control without irradiation and healthy animals were also evaluated. Mice were monitored regarding tumor volume and total blood count. After euthanasia, their organs were examined. We observed that a single irradiation does not increase tumor volume. All irradiated groups exhibited better clinical conditions than control, which presented a significant decrease in platelet and red blood cell levels compared with healthy mice. The energy of 3.6 J arrested neutrophil-lymphocyte rate besides promoting longer survival and a lower number of metastatic nodules in the lungs. These findings suggest that a single red LED irradiation causes no impact on the course of the disease. Besides, the intermediary dose-effect should be further investigated since it seems to promote better outcomes on breast cancer-bearing mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saulo T Pereira
- Center for Lasers and Applications, Energy and Nuclear Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Camila R Silva
- Center for Lasers and Applications, Energy and Nuclear Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Silvia C Nuñez
- Department of Bioengineering, University Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Martha S Ribeiro
- Center for Lasers and Applications, Energy and Nuclear Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|