1
|
Scott AW, Alancherry ASP, Lee C, Eastman E, Zhou Y. Computed tomography dose index determination in dose modulation prospectively involving the third-generation iterative reconstruction and noise index. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14167. [PMID: 37812733 PMCID: PMC11005991 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Optimizing CT protocols is challenging in the presence of automatic dose modulation because the CT dose index (CTDIvol) at different patient sizes is unknown to the operator. The task is more difficult when both the image quality index and iterative reconstruction prospectively affect the dose determination. It is of interest in practice to be informed of the CTDIvol during the protocol initialization and evaluation. It was our objective to obtain a predictive relationship between CTDIvol, the image quality index, and iterative reconstruction strength at various patient sizes. METHODS Dose modulation data were collected on a GE Revolution 256-slice scanner utilizing a Mercury phantom and selections of the noise index (NI) from 8 to 17, the third generation iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) from 0% to 80%, and phantom diameters from 16 to 36 cm. The fixed parameters were 120 kVp, a pitch of .984, and a collimation of 40 mm with a primary slice width of 2.5 mm. The CTDIvol per diameter was based on the average tube current over three adjacent slices (same or similar diameter) multiplied by a conversion factor between the average mA of the series and the reported CTDIvol. The relationship between CTDIvol, NI, and ASIR-V for each diameter was fitted with a 2nd order polynomial of ASIR-V multiplied by a power law of NI. RESULTS The ASIR-V fit parameters versus diameter followed a Lorentz function while the NI exponent versus diameter followed an exponential growth function. The CTDIvol predictions were accurate within 15% compared to phantom results on a separate GE Revolution. For clinical relevance, the phantom diameter was converted to an abdomen or chest equivalent diameter and was well matched to patient data. CONCLUSION The fitted relationship for CTDIvol. for given values of NI and ASIR-V blending for a range of phantom sizes was a good match to phantom and patient data. The results can be of direct help for selecting adequate parameters in CT protocol development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander W. Scott
- Department of ImagingCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Christina Lee
- Department of ImagingCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Emi Eastman
- Department of ImagingCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yifang Zhou
- Department of ImagingCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Congedo A, Mallardi D, Danti G, De Muzio F, Granata V, Miele V. An Updated Review on Imaging and Staging of Anal Cancer-Not Just Rectal Cancer. Tomography 2023; 9:1694-1710. [PMID: 37736988 PMCID: PMC10514831 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9050135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Anal cancer is a rare disease, but its incidence has been increasing steadily. Primary staging and assessment after chemoradiation therapy are commonly performed using MRI, which is considered to be the preferred imaging modality. CT and PET/CT are useful in evaluating lymph node metastases and distant metastatic disease. Anal squamous-cell carcinoma (ASCC) and rectal adenocarcinoma are typically indistinguishable on MRI, and a biopsy prior to imaging is necessary to accurately stage the tumor and determine the treatment approach. This review discusses the histology, MR technique, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of anal cancer, with a particular focus on the differences in TNM staging between anal and rectal carcinomas. PURPOSE This review discusses the histology, MR technique, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of anal cancer, with a particular focus on the differences in TNM staging between anal squamous-cell carcinoma (ASCC) and rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS To conduct this updated review, a comprehensive literature search was performed using prominent medical databases, including PubMed and Embase. The search was limited to articles published within the last 10 years (2013-2023) to ensure their relevance to the current state of knowledge. INCLUSION CRITERIA (1) articles that provided substantial information on the diagnostic techniques used for ASCC, mainly focusing on imaging, were included; (2) studies reporting on emerging technologies; (3) English-language articles. EXCLUSION CRITERIA articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, case reports, or articles with insufficient data. The primary outcome of this review is to assess the accuracy and efficacy of different diagnostic modalities, including CT, MRI, and PET, in diagnosing ASCC. The secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) to identify any advancements or innovations in diagnostic techniques for ASCC over the past decade; (2) to highlight the challenges and limitations of the diagnostic process. RESULTS ASCC is a rare disease; however, its incidence has been steadily increasing. Primary staging and assessment after chemoradiation therapy are commonly performed using MRI, which is considered to be the preferred imaging modality. CT and PET/CT are useful in evaluating lymph node metastases and distant metastatic disease. CONCLUSION ASCC and rectal adenocarcinoma are the most common histological subtypes and are typically indistinguishable on MRI; therefore, a biopsy prior to imaging is necessary to stage the tumor accurately and determine the treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Congedo
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.C.); (D.M.); (V.M.)
| | - Davide Mallardi
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.C.); (D.M.); (V.M.)
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.C.); (D.M.); (V.M.)
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.C.); (D.M.); (V.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reginelli A, Giacobbe G, Del Canto MT, Alessandrella M, Balestrucci G, Urraro F, Russo GM, Gallo L, Danti G, Frittoli B, Stoppino L, Schettini D, Iafrate F, Cappabianca S, Laghi A, Grassi R, Brunese L, Barile A, Miele V. Peritoneal Carcinosis: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111974. [PMID: 37296826 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinosis is a condition characterized by the spread of cancer cells to the peritoneum, which is the thin membrane that lines the abdominal cavity. It is a serious condition that can result from many different types of cancer, including ovarian, colon, stomach, pancreatic, and appendix cancer. The diagnosis and quantification of lesions in peritoneal carcinosis are critical in the management of patients with the condition, and imaging plays a central role in this process. Radiologists play a vital role in the multidisciplinary management of patients with peritoneal carcinosis. They need to have a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of the condition, the underlying neoplasms, and the typical imaging findings. In addition, they need to be aware of the differential diagnoses and the advantages and disadvantages of the various imaging methods available. Imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and quantification of lesions, and radiologists play a critical role in this process. Ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and PET/CT scans are used to diagnose peritoneal carcinosis. Each imaging procedure has advantages and disadvantages, and particular imaging techniques are recommended based on patient conditions. Our aim is to provide knowledge to radiologists regarding appropriate techniques, imaging findings, differential diagnoses, and treatment options. With the advent of AI in oncology, the future of precision medicine appears promising, and the interconnection between structured reporting and AI is likely to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes for patients with peritoneal carcinosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Giuliana Giacobbe
- General and Emergency Radiology Department, "Antonio Cardarelli" Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Del Canto
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Marina Alessandrella
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Balestrucci
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Urraro
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Gaetano Maria Russo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Gallo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Barbara Frittoli
- Department of Radiology, Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Stoppino
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Daria Schettini
- Department of Radiology, Villa Scassi Hospital, Corso Scassi 1, 16121 Genova, Italy
| | - Franco Iafrate
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza-University of Rome, Radiology Unit-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agostini A, Borgheresi A, Mariotti F, Ottaviani L, Carotti M, Valenti M, Giovagnoni A. New frontiers in oncological imaging with Computed Tomography: from morphology to function. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2023; 44:214-227. [DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
5
|
Montella M, Ciani G, Granata V, Fusco R, Grassi F, Ronchi A, Cozzolino I, Franco R, Zito Marino F, Urraro F, Monti R, Sirica R, Savarese G, Chianese U, Nebbioso A, Altucci L, Vietri MT, Nardone V, Reginelli A, Grassi R. Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12111896. [PMID: 36422072 PMCID: PMC9698369 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the qualitative relationship between liquid biopsy and conventional tissue biopsy. As a secondary target, we evaluated the relationship between the liquid biopsy results and the T stage, N stage, M stage, and compared to grading. Methods: The Local Ethics Committee of the “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, with the internal resolution number 24997/2020 of 12.11.2020, approved this spontaneous prospective study. According to the approved protocol, patients with lung cancer who underwent Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC), CT-guided biopsy, and liquid biopsy were enrolled. A Yates chi-square test was employed to analyze differences in percentage values of categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using the Matlab Statistic Toolbox (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Results: When a genetic mutation is present on the pathological examination, this was also detected on the liquid biopsy. ROS1 and PDL1 mutations were found in 2/29 patients, while EGFR Exon 21 was identified in a single patient. At liquid biopsy, 26 mutations were identified in the analyzed samples. The mutations with the highest prevalence rate in the study populations were: ALK (Ile1461Val), found in 28/29 patients (96.6%), EML4 (Lys398Arg), identified in 16/29 (55.2%) patients, ALK (Asp1529Glu), found in 14/29 (48.3%) patients, EGFR (Arg521Lys), found in 12/29 (41.4%) patients, ROS (Lys2228Gln), identified in 11/29 (37.9%) patients, ROS (Arg167Gln) and ROS (Ser2229Cys), identified in 10/29 (34.5%) patients, ALK (Lys1491Arg) and PIK3CA (Ile391Met), identified in 8/29 (27.6%) patients, ROS (Thr145Pro), identified in 6/29 (20.7%) patients, and ROS (Ser1109Leu), identified in 4/29 (13.8%) patients. No statistically significant differences can be observed in the mutation rate between the adenocarcinoma population and the squamous carcinoma population (p > 0.05, Yates chi-square test). Conclusions: We showed that, when a genetic mutation was detected in pathological examination, this was always detected by liquid biopsy, demonstrating a very high concordance rate of genomic testing between tissues and their corresponding mutations obtained by liquid biopsy, without cases of false-negative results. In addition, in our study, liquid biopsy highlighted 26 mutations, with the prevalence of ALK mutation in 96.6% of patients, supporting the idea that this approach could be an effective tool in cases with insufficient tumor tissue specimens or in cases where tissue specimens are not obtainable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Montella
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ciani
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Andrea Ronchi
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Immacolata Cozzolino
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Franco
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Federica Zito Marino
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Urraro
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Monti
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Sirica
- AMES-Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, SRL, 80013 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Ugo Chianese
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Angela Nebbioso
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Lucia Altucci
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Vietri
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Multimodality Imaging Assessment of Desmoid Tumors: The Great Mime in the Era of Multidisciplinary Teams. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071153. [PMID: 35887650 PMCID: PMC9319486 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Desmoid tumors (DTs), also known as desmoid fibromatosis or aggressive fibromatosis, are rare, locally invasive, non-metastatic soft tissue tumors. Although histological results represent the gold standard diagnosis, imaging represents the fundamental tool for the diagnosis of these tumors. Although histological analysis represents the gold standard for diagnosis, imaging represents the fundamental tool for the diagnosis of these tumors. DTs represent a challenge for the radiologist, being able to mimic different pathological conditions. A proper diagnosis is required to establish an adequate therapeutic approach. Multimodality imaging, including ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), should be preferred. Different imaging techniques can also guide minimally invasive treatments and monitor their effectiveness. The purpose of this review is to describe the state-of-the-art multidisciplinary imaging of DTs; and its role in patient management.
Collapse
|
7
|
De Muzio F, Grassi F, Dell’Aversana F, Fusco R, Danti G, Flammia F, Chiti G, Valeri T, Agostini A, Palumbo P, Bruno F, Cutolo C, Grassi R, Simonetti I, Giovagnoni A, Miele V, Barile A, Granata V. A Narrative Review on LI-RADS Algorithm in Liver Tumors: Prospects and Pitfalls. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12071655. [PMID: 35885561 PMCID: PMC9319674 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver cancer is the sixth most detected tumor and the third leading cause of tumor death worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy with specific risk factors and a targeted population. Imaging plays a major role in the management of HCC from screening to post-therapy follow-up. In order to optimize the diagnostic-therapeutic management and using a universal report, which allows more effective communication among the multidisciplinary team, several classification systems have been proposed over time, and LI-RADS is the most utilized. Currently, LI-RADS comprises four algorithms addressing screening and surveillance, diagnosis on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diagnosis on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and treatment response on CT/MRI. The algorithm allows guiding the radiologist through a stepwise process of assigning a category to a liver observation, recognizing both major and ancillary features. This process allows for characterizing liver lesions and assessing treatment. In this review, we highlighted both major and ancillary features that could define HCC. The distinctive dynamic vascular pattern of arterial hyperenhancement followed by washout in the portal-venous phase is the key hallmark of HCC, with a specificity value close to 100%. However, the sensitivity value of these combined criteria is inadequate. Recent evidence has proven that liver-specific contrast could be an important tool not only in increasing sensitivity but also in diagnosis as a major criterion. Although LI-RADS emerges as an essential instrument to support the management of liver tumors, still many improvements are needed to overcome the current limitations. In particular, features that may clearly distinguish HCC from cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and combined HCC-CCA lesions and the assessment after locoregional radiation-based therapy are still fields of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81100 Naples, Italy; (F.G.); (F.D.); (R.G.)
| | - Federica Dell’Aversana
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81100 Naples, Italy; (F.G.); (F.D.); (R.G.)
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Division of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (G.D.); (F.F.); (G.C.); (V.M.)
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (P.P.); (F.B.)
| | - Federica Flammia
- Division of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (G.D.); (F.F.); (G.C.); (V.M.)
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (P.P.); (F.B.)
| | - Giuditta Chiti
- Division of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (G.D.); (F.F.); (G.C.); (V.M.)
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (P.P.); (F.B.)
| | - Tommaso Valeri
- Department of Clinical Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (T.V.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Torrette, Italy
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (T.V.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Torrette, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (P.P.); (F.B.)
- Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (P.P.); (F.B.)
- Emergency Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, Via Lorenzo Natali 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81100 Naples, Italy; (F.G.); (F.D.); (R.G.)
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (P.P.); (F.B.)
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (I.S.); (V.G.)
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (T.V.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Torrette, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Division of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (G.D.); (F.F.); (G.C.); (V.M.)
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (P.P.); (F.B.)
| | - Antonio Barile
- Emergency Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, Via Lorenzo Natali 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (I.S.); (V.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Imaging Severity COVID-19 Assessment in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients: Comparison of the Different Variants in a High Volume Italian Reference Center. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12060955. [PMID: 35743740 PMCID: PMC9224665 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the vaccine effect by comparing five groups: unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant, unvaccinated patients with Delta variant, vaccinated patients with Delta variant, unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, and vaccinated patients with Omicron variant, assessing the “gravity” of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement, based on CT findings in critically ill patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: Patients were selected by ICU database considering the period from December 2021 to 23 March 2022, according to the following inclusion criteria: patients with proven Omicron variant COVID-19 infection with known COVID-19 vaccination with at least two doses and with chest Computed Tomography (CT) study during ICU hospitalization. Wee also evaluated the ICU database considering the period from March 2020 to December 2021, to select unvaccinated consecutive patients with Alpha variant, subjected to CT study, consecutive unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with Delta variant, subjected to CT study, and, consecutive unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, subjected to CT study. CT images were evaluated qualitatively using a severity score scale of 5 levels (none involvement, mild: ≤25% of involvement, moderate: 26−50% of involvement, severe: 51−75% of involvement, and critical involvement: 76−100%) and quantitatively, using the Philips IntelliSpace Portal clinical application CT COPD computer tool. For each patient the lung volumetry was performed identifying the percentage value of aerated residual lung volume. Non-parametric tests for continuous and categorical variables were performed to assess statistically significant differences among groups. Results: The patient study group was composed of 13 vaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron V). As control groups we identified: 20 unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant (Alpha NV); 20 unvaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta NV); 18 vaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta V); and 20 unvaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron NV). No differences between the groups under examination were found (p value > 0.05 at Chi square test) in terms of risk factors (age, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, immunosuppression, chronic kidney, cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, and liver disease, etc.). A different median value of aerated residual lung volume was observed in the Delta variant groups: median value of aerated residual lung volume was 46.70% in unvaccinated patients compared to 67.10% in vaccinated patients. In addition, in patients with Delta variant every other extracted volume by automatic tool showed a statistically significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated group. Statistically significant differences were observed for each extracted volume by automatic tool between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant of COVID-19. Good statistically significant correlations among volumes extracted by automatic tool for each lung lobe and overall radiological severity score were obtained (ICC range 0.71−0.86). GGO was the main sign of COVID-19 lesions on CT images found in 87 of the 91 (95.6%) patients. No statistically significant differences were observed in CT findings (ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidation or crazy paving sign) among patient groups. Conclusion: In our study, we showed that in critically ill patients no difference were observed in terms of severity of disease or exitus, between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients. The only statistically significant differences were observed, with regard to the severity of COVID-19 pulmonary parenchymal involvement, between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant, and between unvaccinated patients with Delta variant and vaccinated patients with Delta variant.
Collapse
|
9
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Belli A, Danti G, Bicci E, Cutolo C, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in abdominal oncological setting: why and when. Infect Agent Cancer 2022; 17:25. [PMID: 35681237 PMCID: PMC9185934 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00441-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This article provides an overview of diffusion kurtosis (DKI) imaging in abdominal oncology. DKI allows for more data on tissue structures than the conventional diffusion model (DWI). However, DKI requires high quality images at b-values greater than 1000 s/mm2 and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that traditionally MRI systems are not able to acquire and therefore there are generally amplified anatomical distortions on the images due to less homogeneity of the field. Advances in both hardware and software on modern MRI scanners have currently enabled ultra-high b-value imaging and offered the ability to apply DKI to multiple extracranial sites. Previous studies have evaluated the ability of DKI to characterize and discriminate tumor grade compared to conventional DWI. Additionally, in several studies the DKI sequences used were based on planar echo (EPI) acquisition, which is susceptible to motion, metal and air artefacts and prone to low SNRs and distortions, leading to low quality images for some small lesions, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Another problem is the optimal b-value of DKI, which remains to be explored and not yet standardized, as well as the manual selection of the ROI, which could affect the accuracy of some parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy.
| | | | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.,Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bicci
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Imaging Features of Main Posthepatectomy Complications: A Radiologist’s Challenge. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12061323. [PMID: 35741133 PMCID: PMC9221607 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In the recent years, the number of liver resections has seen an impressive growth. Usually, hepatic resections remain the treatment of various liver diseases, such as malignant tumors, benign tumors, hydatid disease, and abscesses. Despite technical advancements and tremendous experience in the field of liver resection of specialized centers, there are moderately high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially in high-risk and older patient populations. Although ultrasonography is usually the first-line imaging examination for postoperative complications, Computed Tomography (CT) is the imaging tool of choice in emergency settings due to its capability to assess the whole body in a few seconds and detect all possible complications. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the imaging modality of choice for delineating early postoperative bile duct injuries and ischemic cholangitis that may arise in the late postoperative phase. Moreover, both MDCT and MRCP can precisely detect tumor recurrence. Consequently, radiologists should have knowledge of these surgical procedures for better comprehension of postoperative changes and recognition of the radiological features of various postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
11
|
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Crohn’s Disease: A Review of Recent Literature. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051236. [PMID: 35626391 PMCID: PMC9140029 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is the term used to identify a form of chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract that primarily contemplates two major entities: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). The classic signs are abdominal pain and diarrhoea that correlate with the localization of gastro-enteric disease, although in this pathology extraintestinal symptoms may coexist. The diagnosis of CD relies on a synergistic combination of clinical, laboratory (stool and biochemical), cross-sectional imaging evaluation, as well as endoscopic and histologic assessments. The purpose of this paper is to prove the role of imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with CD with particular focus on recent innovations of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) as a pivotal diagnostic tool, analysing the MRE study protocol and imaging features during the various phases of disease activity and its complications.
Collapse
|
12
|
Granata V, Fusco R, De Muzio F, Cutolo C, Setola SV, Simonetti I, Dell’Aversana F, Grassi F, Bruno F, Belli A, Patrone R, Pilone V, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Complications Risk Assessment and Imaging Findings of Thermal Ablation Treatment in Liver Cancers: What the Radiologist Should Expect. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102766. [PMID: 35628893 PMCID: PMC9147303 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the major fields of application of ablation treatment is liver tumors. With respect to HCC, ablation treatments are considered as upfront treatments in patients with early-stage disease, while in colorectal liver metastases (CLM), they can be employed as an upfront treatment or in association with surgical resection. The main prognostic feature of ablation is the tumor size, since the goal of the treatment is the necrosis of all viable tumor tissue with an adequate tumor-free margin. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are the most employed ablation techniques. Ablation therapies in HCC and liver metastases have presented a challenge to radiologists, who need to assess response to determine complication-related treatment. Complications, defined as any unexpected variation from a procedural course, and adverse events, defined as any actual or potential injury related to the treatment, could occur either during the procedure or afterwards. To date, RFA and MWA have shown no statistically significant differences in mortality rates or major or minor complications. To reduce the rate of major complications, patient selection and risk assessment are essential. To determine the right cost-benefit ratio for the ablation method to be used, it is necessary to identify patients at high risk of infections, coagulation disorders and previous abdominal surgery interventions. Based on risk assessment, during the procedure as part of surveillance, the radiologists should pay attention to several complications, such as vascular, biliary, mechanical and infectious. Multiphase CT is an imaging tool chosen in emergency settings. The radiologist should report technical success, treatment efficacy, and complications. The complications should be assessed according to well-defined classification systems, and these complications should be categorized consistently according to severity and time of occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.S.); (I.S.); (A.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy;
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.C.); (V.P.)
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.S.); (I.S.); (A.P.)
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.S.); (I.S.); (A.P.)
| | - Federica Dell’Aversana
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy; (F.D.); (F.G.)
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy; (F.D.); (F.G.)
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (R.P.); (F.I.)
| | - Renato Patrone
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (R.P.); (F.I.)
| | - Vincenzo Pilone
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.C.); (V.P.)
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.S.); (I.S.); (A.P.)
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (R.P.); (F.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pulmonary Lymphangitis Poses a Major Challenge for Radiologists in an Oncological Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12040624. [PMID: 35455740 PMCID: PMC9024504 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the increasing number of COVID-19-infected and vaccinated individuals, radiologists continue to see patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis and recall pneumonitis, which could result in additional workups and false-positive results. Moreover, cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy may show therapy-related pneumonitis during imaging management. This is otherwise known as immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis. Following on from this background, radiologists should seek to know their patients’ COVID-19 infection and vaccination history. Knowing the imaging features related to COVID-19 infection and vaccination is critical to avoiding misleading results and alarmism in patients and clinicians.
Collapse
|
14
|
Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: What the Multidisciplinary Team Should Know. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12040890. [PMID: 35453938 PMCID: PMC9026907 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare type of primary liver malignancy. Among the risk factors, hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections, cirrhosis, and male gender are widely reported. The clinical appearance of cHCC-CCA is similar to that of HCC and iCCA and it is usually silent until advanced states, causing a delay of diagnosis. Diagnosis is mainly based on histology from biopsies or surgical specimens. Correct pre-surgical diagnosis during imaging studies is very problematic and is due to the heterogeneous characteristics of the lesion in imaging, with overlapping features of HCC and CCA. The predominant histological subtype within the lesion establishes the predominant imaging findings. Therefore, in this scenario, the radiological findings characteristic of HCC show an overlap with those of CCA. Since cHCC-CCAs are prevalent in patients at high risk of HCC and there is a risk that these may mimic HCC, it is currently difficult to see a non-invasive diagnosis of HCC. Surgery is the only curative treatment of HCC-CCA. The role of liver transplantation (LT) in the treatment of cHCC-CCA remains controversial, as is the role of ablative or systemic therapies in the treatment of this tumour. These lesions still remain challenging, both in diagnosis and in the treatment phase. Therefore, a pre-treatment imaging diagnosis is essential, as well as the identification of prognostic factors that could stratify the risk of recurrence and the most adequate therapy according to patient characteristics.
Collapse
|
15
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Belli A, Borzillo V, Palumbo P, Bruno F, Grassi R, Ottaiano A, Nasti G, Pilone V, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Conventional, functional and radiomics assessment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Infect Agent Cancer 2022; 17:13. [PMID: 35346300 PMCID: PMC8961950 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00429-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This paper offers an assessment of diagnostic tools in the evaluation of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods Several electronic datasets were analysed to search papers on morphological and functional evaluation in ICC patients. Papers published in English language has been scheduled from January 2010 to December 2021.
Results We found that 88 clinical studies satisfied our research criteria. Several functional parameters and morphological elements allow a truthful ICC diagnosis. The contrast medium evaluation, during the different phases of contrast studies, support the recognition of several distinctive features of ICC. The imaging tool to employed and the type of contrast medium in magnetic resonance imaging, extracellular or hepatobiliary, should change considering patient, departement, and regional features. Also, Radiomics is an emerging area in the evaluation of ICCs. Post treatment studies are required to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of therapies so as the patient surveillance. Conclusions Several morphological and functional data obtained during Imaging studies allow a truthful ICC diagnosis.
Collapse
|
16
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Vallone P, Setola SV, Picone C, Grassi F, Patrone R, Belli A, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Not only lymphadenopathy: case of chest lymphangitis assessed with MRI after COVID 19 vaccine. Infect Agent Cancer 2022; 17:8. [PMID: 35300727 PMCID: PMC8929244 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00419-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, no paper reports cases of lymphangitis after COVID 19 vaccination. We present a case of lymphangitis after vaccination from COVID 19, in a patient with colorectal liver metastases. METHODS We described the case of a 56-year-old woman with history of a surgical resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases, without any kind of drug therapy for about a month. In addition, a recent administration (2 days ago) of Spikevax (mRNA-1273, Moderna vaccine), as a booster dose, on the right arm was reported. RESULTS The magnetic resonance (MR) examination showed the effects of the previous surgical resection and five new hepatic metastases, located in the VIII, VI, V, IV and II hepatic segments. As an accessory finding the presence of lymphadenopathy in the axillary area and lymphangitis of the right breast and chest were identified. The computed tomography scan performed a week earlier, and re-evaluated in light of the MR data, did not identify the presence of lymphadenopathy in the axillary area and lymphangitis signs. CONCLUSIONS Lymphangitis could occur after COVID 19 vaccine and it is important to know this data to avoid alarmism in patients and clinicians and economic waste linked to the execution of various radiological investigations for the search for a tumour that probably does not exist. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy.
| | | | - Paolo Vallone
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Carmine Picone
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Division of Radiology, "Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Patrone
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Granata V, Grassi R, Fusco R, Belli A, Cutolo C, Pradella S, Grazzini G, La Porta M, Brunese MC, De Muzio F, Ottaiano A, Avallone A, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Diagnostic evaluation and ablation treatments assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Infect Agent Cancer 2021; 16:53. [PMID: 34281580 PMCID: PMC8287696 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-021-00393-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This article provides an overview of diagnostic evaluation and ablation treatment assessment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Only studies, in the English language from January 2010 to January 202, evaluating the diagnostic tools and assessment of ablative therapies in HCC patients were included. We found 173 clinical studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria.HCC may be noninvasively diagnosed by imaging findings. Multiphase contrast-enhanced imaging is necessary to assess HCC. Intravenous extracellular contrast agents are used for CT, while the agents used for MRI may be extracellular or hepatobiliary. Both gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine may be used in hepatobiliary phase imaging. For treatment-naive patients undergoing CT, unenhanced imaging is optional; however, it is required in the post treatment setting for CT and all MRI studies. Late arterial phase is strongly preferred over early arterial phase. The choice of modality (CT, US/CEUS or MRI) and MRI contrast agent (extracelllar or hepatobiliary) depends on patient, institutional, and regional factors. MRI allows to link morfological and functional data in the HCC evaluation. Also, Radiomics is an emerging field in the assessment of HCC patients.Postablation imaging is necessary to assess the treatment results, to monitor evolution of the ablated tissue over time, and to evaluate for complications. Post- thermal treatments, imaging should be performed at regularly scheduled intervals to assess treatment response and to evaluate for new lesions and potential complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology SIRM, SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Silvia Pradella
- Radiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Grazzini
- Radiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Abdominal Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Abdominal Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|