Concomitant endoscopic carpal and cubital tunnel release: safety and efficacy

Effectiveness of chitosan phonophoresis on ulnar nerve conduction velocity, pain relief, and functional outcomes for mild to moderate cubital tunnel syndrome: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CBTS) impairs hand function, with limited conservative options often leading to surgery. Chitosan neuroregenerative effects delivered via phonophoresis provide a rationale for testing this emerging treatment approach.

PURPOSE

The primary goal of this research was to assess the impact of chitosan phonophoresis on the conductivity of the ulnar nerve, as well as its effects on pain levels and functional outcomes in individuals diagnosed with mild to moderate CBTS.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study. The participants consisted of 54 individuals aged between 20-35 years who were randomly assigned using block randomization. The control group (n = 27) received standard hand therapy alone, while the experimental group (n = 27) received both standard hand therapy and chitosan phonophoresis. Both groups underwent three treatment sessions per week, each lasting for 60-72 minutes, over a period of five weeks. Pre- and post-intervention evaluations included assessments of ulnar nerve conduction velocity (NCV), pain assessment using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), as well as hand function evaluated using the Quick Disabilities of Arm Shoulder Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire.

RESULTS

After the intervention, the experimental group significantly improved in all outcome measures compared to the control group. Accordingly, ulnar NCV (MD = 2.233 m/sec; CI = 1.63:2.83; p < 0.001; η2p = 0.516), NPRS (MD = -1.11; CI = -1.71: -0.50; p < 0.001; η2p = 0.208) and QuickDASH (MD = -2.72; CI = -4.54:0.87; p < 0.007; η2p = 0.133).

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that chitosan phonophoresis may have the potential as a supplementary treatment to hand therapy for individuals with mild to moderate CBTS. This approach demonstrated significant improvements in nerve conduction, pain reduction, and enhancement of hand function.

Demographics of Common Compressive Neuropathies in the Upper Extremity

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the demographic differences of the most common peripheral nerve compressions in the upper extremity-carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), ulnar nerve compression (UNC) at the elbow, combined CTS and UNC, radial tunnel syndrome (RTS), and posterior interosseous nerve syndrome (PINS)-as a means to better understand the etiologies of each.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients over the age of 18 years seen at our institution in the 2018 calendar year. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients with diagnoses of upper extremity peripheral nerve compressions. Demographic details and relevant comorbidities were recorded for each patient and compared with controls, who were seen the same calendar year with no neuropathies. χ2 analyses, independent-samples t tests, and multivariate logistic regressions were performed (P < .05).

RESULTS

A total of 7448 patients were identified. Those with CTS were mainly women, former smokers, and diabetic (all P < .001) and with a greater average body mass index (BMI) (P = .006) than controls. Patients with UNC were more often men and younger when compared with controls (both P < .001). A history of smoking, diabetes, and average BMI were similar between patients with UNC and controls (all P > .05). Those patients with combined CTS/UNC were mainly men, former smokers, and diabetic (all P < .001) when compared with controls. Patients with RTS/PINS were also mostly men (P = .007), diabetic (P = .042), and were more often current smokers (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The demographics of patients with various compressive neuropathies were not homogeneous, suggesting different etiologies.

The prevalence of double- and multiple crush syndromes in patients surgically treated for peripheral nerve compression in the upper limb

OBJECTIVE

The double crush syndrome describes a condition characterized by multifocal entrapment of a nerve. In the upper limb, the high prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome makes it a common diagnosis of assumption in the setting of median neuropathy. More proximal compressions may tend to be overlooked, under-diagnosed and under-treated in the population. This study aims to map the prevalence of peripheral upper limb nerve compressions among patients undergoing peripheral nerve decompression.

METHODS

A prospective case series was conducted on 183 patients undergoing peripheral nerve decompression in a private hand surgery clinic. Level(s) of nerve compression in the median, ulnar and radial nerves were determined by history and physical examination. The prevalence of each nerve compression syndrome or combination of syndromes was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 320 upper limbs in 183 patients were analyzed. A double crush of the median nerve at the levels of the lacertus fibrosus and carpal tunnel was identified in 78% of upper limbs with median neuropathy, whereas isolated lacertus syndrome and carpal tunnel syndrome were present in only 5% and 17% of affected limbs respectively. Cubital tunnel syndrome affected 12.5% of upper limbs, and 80% of these had concomitant lacertus and carpal tunnel syndromes, compared to only 7.5% with isolated cubital tunnel syndrome.

CONCLUSION

A high prevalence should prompt clinicians towards more routine assessment for double crush syndrome to avoid misdiagnosis, inadequate treatment, recurrence, and revision surgeries.

The association between surgery for carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome: analysis of incidence and risk factors within a geographical area

The relationship between surgery for cubital tunnel and carpal tunnel syndrome was examined in this retrospective study. Between 1997 and 2018, data from consecutive patients who underwent carpal tunnel release (8352 patients), cubital tunnel release (1681 patients) or both procedures (692 patients) were analysed. The relative risk of undergoing cubital tunnel release in the population who had carpal tunnel release compared with those with no carpal tunnel release was 15.3 (male 20.3; female 12.5). The relative risk of undergoing carpal tunnel release in the population who had cubital tunnel release compared with those who did not undergo carpal tunnel release was 11.5 (male 16.5; female 9.1). Our study showed that men and women who undergo carpal tunnel release are over 20 times and 10 times more likely to have cubital tunnel release than those who did not undergo carpal tunnel release, respectively. These findings suggest that the two conditions may share a similar aetiology.Level of evidence: IV.

Simultaneous Bilateral Carpal and Cubital Tunnel Releases: Quadruple Tunnel Release

The authors retrospectively reviewed the first 30 patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous carpal and cubital releases (quadruple tunnel release). Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire over the phone regarding their satisfaction with the procedures and willingness to make the same choice of bilateral carpal and cubital releases simultaneously, as well as the time to return to unrestricted use. Of 24 patients who responded to the questionnaire, 23 (95.8%) were satisfied or highly satisfied with their care, and 23 (95.8%) would again choose to have release of the 4 tunnels simultaneously. Time to unrestricted use in this patient cohort averaged 27 days. Quadruple tunnel release is technically feasible and well tolerated. This procedure has the potential to save considerable amounts of recuperation time and is less expensive than performing 4 individual procedures for patients who have bilateral carpal and bilateral cubital tunnel syndrome. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e592-e594.].

Classification and Treatment of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation Following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release

Purpose

Endoscopic cubital tunnel release (ECuTR) is an effective procedure to alleviate cubital tunnel syndrome. To improve patient outcomes and lessen concerns regarding ulnar nerve subluxation (UNS) after ECuTR, the current study proposes an intraoperative UNS classification system and subsequent treatment protocol. We present a preliminary report of patients treated under these guidelines.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 87 patients (100 ECuTRs). Nerve mobility was classified during surgery, in which grade 1 = no movement or partial subluxation; deep retrocondylar groove and/or no generalized hypermobility (no further intervention); grade 2 = partial subluxation; shallow retrocondylar groove and/or inherent generalized hypermobility (required medial epicondylectomy); and grade 3 = complete anterior dislocation (required medial epicondylectomy or anterior transposition). Clinical outcomes at final follow-up (mean ± SD, 34 ± 20.3 weeks; range, 5–89 weeks) were collected and included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaires, visual analog scale pain score, grip and pinch strength, 2-point discrimination, and range of motion.

Results

We report 37 patients (42 cases), grade 1 (n = 30), grade 2 (n = 1), and grade 3 (n = 11). Gross grip strength, lateral, 3-jaw chuck, and precision pinch strength recovered 87%, 90%, 105%, and 87%, respectively. Wrist and elbow range of motion returned to normal limits, 2-point discrimination improved to normal scores at final follow-up, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were reduced from 59.8 before to 29.9 after surgery, and visual analog scale pain score improved from 7.2 before to 2.5 after surgery (P < .001).

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study to classify UNS after ECuTR and describe a guideline for ensuing treatment. Our preliminary report of patients shows satisfactory outcomes, which suggests that our intraoperative UNS classification system has promise in preventing adverse complications of ulnar nerve hypermobility after ECuTR.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

The Association Between Concomitant Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Background: Many patients treated for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow (UNE) are concomitantly treated for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We sought to investigate the association between the conditions. Methods: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was used to determine the number of patients with UNE concomitantly treated for CTS in New York State from 2003 to 2014. We then retrospectively reviewed each patient who received surgical treatment for UNE (n = 222 patients) or CTS (n = 1063 patients) at our tertiary care institution in 2014 and 2015 to assess concomitant treatment. Results: In the SPARCS database, the percentage of patients surgically treated for concomitant UNE and CTS steadily increased from 23% in 2003 to 45% in 2014. At our institution, 50 of 222 patients (23%) surgically treated for UNE underwent concomitant carpal tunnel releases. For concomitantly treated patients, 94% had examinations consistent with UNE and CTS, 87% of patients had median nerve compression on electrodiagnostic tests, and 72% of patients had UNE on electrodiagnostic tests. Conclusions: Most patients concomitantly treated for UNE and CTS have objective findings of both conditions. At least one-fourth of patients indicated for operative ulnar nerve release also require a carpal tunnel release-far beyond the prevalence of CTS in the general population. A diagnosis of UNE merits a comprehensive workup by the treating surgeon and a high suspicion for concomitant median nerve compression.

A minimally invasive approach for cubital tunnel release and ulnar nerve transposition

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to introduce a new minimally invasive technique for ulnar nerve release and transposition.

METHODS

From January 2010 to May 2011, 51 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome were treated through a 1.5 to 2 cm incision. Limb functional recovery, scar esthetics, sensitivity of scar, numbness of the operating area, and patient satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

No wound hematoma nor infection was observed in the group. The time of operation was 36 ± 17.2 minutes. At the final follow-up of 63 ± 7.3 months, 2-point discrimination of the small finger was improved from 6.3 ± 2.2 mm to 5.2 ± 2.4 mm. Grip and pinch strength of the hand were improved from 14.2 ± 7.7 kg and 3.7 ± 2.4 kg to 35.2 ± 12.7 kg and 4.1 ± 2.8 kg, respectively. The motor nerve conduction velocity was improved from 36.5 ± 11.2 to 44.6 ± 6.7 (m/sec). The Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand questionnaire score was improved from 37.2 ± 23.8 to 10.5 ± 9.6. No patients reported scar pain, sensitivity of scar, or numbness of the operating area. No revision surgery was needed. Michigan Hand Outcome score for aesthetics was 94.6%±5.1 and satisfaction was 92 ± 8, respectively. We obtained 33 excellent, 12 good, 5 fair, and 1 poor result.

CONCLUSION

Ulnar nerve decompression with anterior transposition can be safely and effectively accomplished through the small incision. It can be an alternative technique producing good appearance.