Surgeon perspectives on alternative nerve repair techniques

Heterologous fibrin biopolymer as an emerging approach to peripheral nerve repair: a scoping review

Nerve injuries present a substantial challenge within the medical domain due to their prevalent occurrence and significant impact. In nerve injuries, a range of physiopathological and metabolic responses come into play to stabilize and repair the resulting damage. A critical concern arises from the disruption of connections at neuromuscular junctions, leading to profound degeneration and substantial loss of muscle function, thereby hampering motor tasks. While end-to-end neurorrhaphy serves as the established technique for treating peripheral nerve injuries, achieving comprehensive morphofunctional recovery remains a formidable challenge. In pursuit of enhancing the repair process, alternative and supportive methods are being explored. A promising candidate is the utilization of heterologous fibrin biopolymer, a sealant devoid of human blood components. Notably, this biopolymer has showcased its prowess in establishing a stable and protective microenvironment at the site of use in multiple scenarios of regenerative medicine. Hence, this scoping review is directed towards assessing the effects of associating heterologous fibrin biopolymer with neurorrhaphy to treat nerve injuries, drawing upon findings from prior studies disseminated through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Further discourse delves into the intricacies of the biology of neuromuscular junctions, nerve injury pathophysiology, and the broader utilization of fibrin sealants in conjunction with sutures for nerve reconstruction procedures. The association of the heterologous fibrin biopolymer with neurorrhaphy emerges as a potential avenue for surmounting the limitations associated with traditional sealants while also mitigating degeneration in nerves, muscles, and NMJs post-injury, thereby fostering a more conducive environment for subsequent regeneration. Indeed, queries arise regarding the long-term regenerative potential of this approach and its applicability in reconstructive surgeries for human nerve injuries.

In Vivo Efficacy of a Novel, Sutureless Coaptation Device for Repairing Peripheral Nerve Defects

Although microsuture neurorrhaphy is the accepted clinical standard treatment for severed peripheral nerves, this technique requires microsurgical proficiency and still often fails to provide adequate nerve approximation for effective regeneration. Entubulation utilizing commercially available conduits may enhance the technical quality of the nerve coaptation and potentially provide a proregenerative microenvironment, but still requires precise suture placement. We developed a sutureless nerve coaptation device, Nerve Tape®, that utilizes Nitinol microhooks embedded within a porcine small intestinal submucosa backing. These tiny microhooks engage the outer epineurium of the nerve, while the backing wraps the coaptation to provide a stable, entubulated repair. In this study, we examine the impact of Nerve Tape on nerve tissue and axonal regeneration, compared with repairs performed with commercially available conduit-assisted or microsuture-only repairs. Eighteen male New Zealand white rabbits underwent a tibial nerve transection, immediately repaired with (1) Nerve Tape, (2) conduit plus anchoring sutures, or (3) four 9-0 nylon epineurial microsutures. At 16 weeks postinjury, the nerves were re-exposed to test sensory and motor nerve conduction, measure target muscle weight and girth, and perform nerve tissue histology. Nerve conduction velocities in the Nerve Tape group were significantly better than both the microsuture and conduit groups, while nerve compound action potential amplitudes in the Nerve Tape group were significantly better than the conduit group only. Gross morphology, muscle characteristics, and axon histomorphometry were not statistically different between the three repair groups. In the rabbit tibial nerve repair model, Nerve Tape offers similar regeneration efficacy compared with conduit-assisted and microsuture-only repairs, suggesting minimal impact of microhooks on nerve tissue.

Biomechanical Testing of a Novel Device for Sutureless Nerve Repair

Suboptimal nerve end alignment achieved with conventional nerve repair techniques may contribute to poor clinical outcomes. In this study, we introduce Nerve Tape®, a novel nerve repair device that integrates flexible columns of Nitinol microhooks within a biologic backing to entubulate, align, and secure approximated nerve ends. This study compares the repair strength of Nerve Tape with that of conventional microsuture repairs. Thirty small (2 mm) and 30 large (7 mm) diameter human cadaveric nerves were transected and repaired utilizing Nerve Tape or appropriate microsuture technique. Biomechanical testing was performed using a horizontal tensile tester. The repaired nerves were loaded until failure at a distraction rate of 40 mm/min, and the maximum failure load was determined. In the small nerve groups, the load-to-failure for Nerve Tape repairs (2.33 ± 0.66 N) was significantly higher than for suture repairs (1.22 ± 0.52 N; p < 0.05). In the large nerve groups, no significant difference in load-to-failure was found between Nerve Tape (7.45 ± 2.66 N) and suture repairs (5.82 ± 1.59 N: p = 0.12). Suture repairs tended to fail by rupture, whereas Nerve Tape failures resulted from microhook pullout. Nerve Tape is a novel nerve coaptation device that provides mechanical repair strength equal or greater to clinically relevant microsuture repairs.

Strength Comparison of Fibrin Glue and Suture Constructs in Upper Extremity Peripheral Nerve Coaptations: An In Vitro Study

PURPOSE

To compare in vitro failure loads of nerve coaptations using fibrin glue alone, a suture alone, and a combination of fibrin glue and a suture.

METHODS

The median, radial, and ulnar nerves of 15 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremity specimens (45 nerves in total) were dissected in vitro and transected 5 cm proximal to the wrist crease to simulate an injury requiring coaptation. Three coaptation techniques were used: fibrin glue alone, a suture alone, and a suture augmented with fibrin glue. The load to failure of each repair was measured using a linear servo-actuator with an in-line force sensor. The results were analyzed using 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance tests and pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Both the nerve coaptation technique and the specific nerve that was repaired had a significant effect on failure load. Suture-glue repair had the highest load to failure, 11.2 ± 2.9 N, and significantly increased the load to failure by 2.9 ± 1.7 N compared with glue repair alone. There was no significant difference between suture-glue repair and suture repair alone or between glue repair alone and suture repair alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In this in vitro cadaveric model, nerve injury coaptation using both a suture and fibrin glue resulted in the strongest repair. The addition of fibrin glue may provide some benefit when used to augment suture repair, but when used in isolation, it is inferior to combined suture-and-glue constructs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Combined suture-and-glue nerve coaptations might be useful in the early postoperative period in increasing nerve repair strength and potentially reducing rupture rates.

Comparison of Nylon Suture Versus 2 Fibrin Glue Products for Delayed Nerve Coaptation in an Animal Model

PURPOSE

To compare 2 different, commercially available fibrin glue products with nylon suture with regard to repair strength, muscle function, and axon regeneration after delayed nerve repair in an animal model.

METHODS

A total of 120 Lewis rats underwent transection of the sciatic nerve. On day 3 after transection, the nerves were reexposed. A primary repair was performed on 40 rats from each group using nylon suture, Tisseel fibrin glue, or Evicel fibrin glue. On days 0, 3, and 7 after repair, 10 rats from each group underwent burst strength testing. Seventy days after repair, 10 rats from each group underwent functional muscle testing and histomorphic analysis of the nerve, with the contralateral limb serving as the control.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in burst strength among the groups on days 0 and 3. On day 7, the burst strength of the Evicel and nylon suture groups was significantly greater than that of the Tisseel group. There were 5 total coaptation failures in both fibrin glue groups and none in the suture group. Seventy days after repair, tetanic muscle strength, muscle mass, axon inner diameter, and g-ratio were equivalent among all groups. Axon counts were equivalent between the nylon suture and Evicel groups, although in the nylon group axon counts were higher than for the Tisseel group.

CONCLUSIONS

In an animal model with a 3-day delay in nerve repair, although dehiscences occurred, when the initial repair held, fibrin glue was not inferior to nylon suture with regard to repair strength and muscle recovery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Historical concerns regarding spontaneous fibrin glue-based nerve repair dehiscences are well-founded. However, when coaptation is maintained, commercially available fibrin glues support nerve regeneration.

Implantation of Acellular Nerve Allograft Using Nerve Connectors

Background: Nerve connectors are short nerve conduits used to approximate nerve ends. Acellular nerve allografts are viable alternatives when direct repair is not possible but do not produce exudate essential for fibrin clot formation. We hypothesize that acellular nerve allograft implanted using nerve connectors must have end-to-end contact with the in situ nerve stumps to support nerve regeneration. Methods: Sixty Sprague Dawley rats underwent a 14-mm unilateral tibial nerve injury and subsequent repair using various combinations of acellular nerve grafts and nerve connectors. Proximal repairs for all groups utilized direct contact with the nerve stump within connector. Variations in distal repair methods (allograft length, nerve gap, and connector length) defined our 4 groups-group A: 14 mm allograft, no distal gap, and distal connector; group B: 11.5 mm allograft, 2.5 mm distal gap, and distal connector; group C: 9 mm allograft, 5 mm distal gap, and distal connector; group D: 14 mm allograft, no distal gap, and no distal connector. At 3 months post-repair, function and histomorphology were assessed. Results: Developed muscle force was significantly lower in group C (0.073 ± 0.077 N) compared with the other 3 groups (group A = 0.529 ± 0.312 N, group B = 0.461 ± 0.462 N, and group D = 0.409 ± 0.327 N). Axon counts were significantly lower in group C (2121 ± 389) compared with group A (6401 ± 855), group B (4710 ± 755), and group D (4450 ± 126). There was no statistically significant difference in G-ratios (myelination) between groups (P > .05). Conclusion: Nerve regeneration was significantly impaired as the gap distance between the distal end of the allograft and the distal nerve stump increased to 5 mm.

Hand Surgeon Perspectives on Upper Extremity Allograft: A Survey of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand

INTRODUCTION

Allograft tissue products have widespread applications across surgical specialties, but little data exist about surgeon attitudes toward the use of these products in the upper extremity.

METHODS

Using a web-based survey, we sought to investigate the use of and feelings toward allograft products among hand surgeons. A short questionnaire was distributed to all active members of American Society for Surgery of the Hand as of October 2015 (N = 2,578). Demographic and practice setting information was collected. Additionally, questions concerning the use of human allograft tissue products of various types including bone, skin, and soft tissues were asked.

RESULTS

Of 2,578 American Society for Surgery of the Hand members, 406 hand surgeons (15.8%) responded to the survey. A large majority (92%) reported having used allograft products in the upper extremity. Orthopedic-trained surgeons were more likely to have used bone and tendon allograft, whereas plastic and general surgery-trained surgeons were more likely to have used nerve and dermis allograft. Reduced donor site morbidity and complication rates were factors motivating surgeons to use allograft tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of variation with respect to their use, allograft tissue products are popular and interest in new products, especially to improve flexor tendon pulley reconstruction, is high.

Assessment of Conduit-Assisted Primary Nerve Repair Strength With Varying Suture Size, Number, and Location

Background: Outcomes following digital nerve repair are suboptimal despite much research and various methods of repair. Increased tensile strength of the repair and decreased suture material at the repair site may be 2 methods of improving biologic and biomechanical outcomes, and conduit-assisted repair can aid in achieving both of these goals. Methods: Ninety-nine fresh-frozen digital nerves were equally divided into 11 different groups. Each group uses a different combination of number of sutures at the coaptation site and number of sutures at each end of the nerve-conduit junction, as well as 2 calibers of nylon suture. Nerves were transected, repaired with these various suture configurations using an AxoGuard conduit, and loaded to failure. Results: The 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that repairs performed with 8-0 suture have significantly higher maximum failure load compared with 9-0 suture repairs (P < .01). Increasing the number of sutures in the repair significantly increased the maximum failure load in all groups regardless of suture caliber used (P < .01). Repairs with 9-0 suture at the coaptation site did not jeopardize repair strength when compared with 8-0 suture. Conclusions: Conduit-assisted primary digital nerve repairs with 8-0 suture increases the maximum load to failure compared with repairs with 9-0 suture, as does increasing the overall number of sutures. Using 9-0 suture at the coaptation site with 8-0 suture at the nerve-conduit junction does not jeopardize tensile strength when compared with similar repairs using all 8-0 suture and may decrease inflammation at the repair site while still achieving sufficient tensile strength.

Decision-Making Factors for Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Cubital Tunnel Surgery

Background  We designed a survey to ascertain the current perspectives of hand surgeons on the evaluation and management of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow. The secondary aim was to assess the concordance of hand surgeons on definitions of the terms "subluxated" and "dislocated" for classification of ulnar nerve instability. Methods  A questionnaire, including demographic practice variables, cubital tunnel practice patterns, preoperative imaging and electrodiagnostic evaluation, and a series of standardized intraoperative photographs of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow were developed and distributed to the current American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) membership. Results  A total of 690 (26.8%) members completed the survey; 84.2% of respondents indicated that they evaluate for ulnar nerve instability preoperatively with clinical examination, whereas only 6.1% indicated they routinely obtained dynamic ultrasound. Respondents indicated that the factors most strongly influencing their decision to proceed with anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve were subluxation on physical examination (89.6%), history consistent with ulnar nerve subluxation (85.8%), and muscle atrophy (43.2%). On review of clinical photographs, respondents demonstrated varying degrees of agreement on the terms "subluxated" or "dislocated" and recommendations for ulnar nerve transposition at intermediate degrees of ulnar nerve instability. Conclusion  ASSH members routinely evaluate for ulnar nerve instability with history and clinical examination without uniform use of preoperative ultrasound, and nearly half of the time the decision to transpose the ulnar nerve is made intraoperatively. Definitions for the degree of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow are not uniformly agreed upon, and further development of a classification system may be warranted to standardize treatment.

A novel conduit-based coaptation device for primary nerve repair

BACKGROUND

Conduit-based nerve repairs are commonly used for small nerve gaps, whereas primary repair may be performed if there is no tension on nerve endings. We hypothesize that a conduit-based nerve coaptation device will improve nerve repair outcomes by avoiding sutures at the nerve repair site and utilizing the advantages of a conduit-based repair.

METHODS

The left sciatic nerves of female Sprague-Dawley rats were transected and repaired using a novel conduit-based device. The conduit-based device group was compared to a control group of rats that underwent a standard end-to-end microsurgical repair of the sciatic nerve. Animals underwent behavioral assessments at weekly intervals post-operatively using the sciatic functional index (SFI) test. Animals were sacrificed at four weeks to obtain motor axon counts from immunohistochemistry. A sub-group of animals were sacrificed immediately post repair to obtain MRI images.

RESULTS

SFI scores were superior in rats which received conduit-based repairs compared to the control group. Motor axon counts distal to the injury in the device group at four weeks were statistically superior to the control group. MRI tractography was used to demonstrate repair of two nerves using the novel conduit device.

CONCLUSIONS

A conduit-based nerve coaptation device avoids sutures at the nerve repair site and leads to improved outcomes in a rat model. Conduit-based nerve repair devices have the potential to standardize nerve repairs while improving outcomes.

Technical Assessment of Connector-Assisted Nerve Repair

PURPOSE

Clinical outcomes of nerve repair have not substantially improved over the last several decades. Although clearly a multifactorial problem, basic principles including proper fascicular alignment are not always realized. The use of short conduits as connectors may enhance nerve alignment by entubulating and directing the approximation of nerve ends.

METHODS

Ten hand surgeons (5 experienced and 5 inexperienced) performed a series of in vitro human cadaver nerve repairs. Three small-diameter (2 mm), 3 medium-diameter (3-4 mm), and 3 large-diameter (5-6 mm) nerves were repaired (under 10× magnification) utilizing each of 3 techniques: suture-only, connector-only (sutures placed through the ends of the connector), and connector-assisted (alignment sutures at the nerve interface plus connector). Three judges (blinded to who performed the repairs) assessed each repair for fascicular alignment based on predetermined qualitative scales.

RESULTS

Across all surgeons, 23 of 30 connector-assisted repairs were judged good or excellent versus 18 of 30 of the suture-only and 13 of 30 of the connector-only repairs. Experienced surgeons in general did better repairs and in particular were more likely to obtain superior alignment for conduit-only repairs (73.3% vs 13.3% good or excellent) and suture-only repairs (73.3% vs 46.7% good or excellent) and were not statistically different for connector-assisted repairs (86.7% vs 66.7% good or excellent) compared with inexperienced surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cadaver nerve model, there was no significant difference in the technical alignment of conduit-assisted repairs between experienced and inexperienced surgeons whereas inexperienced surgeons were more likely to achieve inadequate alignment with suture-only or conduit-only repairs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Connector-assisted repairs combining suture-approximation and entubulation may improve the technical alignment of nerve repairs performed, especially by less-experienced surgeons.

One-stage human acellular nerve allograft reconstruction for digital nerve defects

Human acellular nerve allografts have a wide range of donor origin and can effectively avoid nerve injury in the donor area. Very little is known about one-stage reconstruction of digital nerve defects. The present study observed the feasibility and effectiveness of human acellular nerve allograft in the reconstruction of < 5-cm digital nerve defects within 6 hours after injury. A total of 15 cases of nerve injury, combined with nerve defects in 18 digits from the Department of Emergency were enrolled in this study. After debridement, digital nerves were reconstructed using human acellular nerve allografts. The patients were followed up for 6–24 months after reconstruction. Mackinnon-Dellon static two-point discrimination results showed excellent and good rates of 89%. Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test demonstrated that light touch was normal, with an obvious improvement rate of 78%. These findings confirmed that human acellular nerve allograft for one-stage reconstruction of digital nerve defect after hand injury is feasible, which provides a novel trend for peripheral nerve reconstruction.