Solitary lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer

Feasibility and Efficacy of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis is a critical prognostic factor for patients with gastric carcinoma (GC). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has the potential to identify the initial site of draining lymph node metastasis and reduce the extent of surgical lymphadenectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SLN mapping in GC.

METHODS

The study enrolled 129 GC patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and indocyanine green fluorescence-guided SLN mapping. The primary outcomes were the negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity of SLN mapping. The secondary outcomes were clinicopathologic factors associated with SLN mapping accuracy and successful SLN mapping.

RESULTS

The SLN detection rate in this study was 86.8 %. The study had an overall NPV of 83.1 % and an overall sensitivity of 65.8 %. The NPV was found to be significantly higher in the patients with no lymphovascular invasion (LVI) than in those with LVI (96.0 % vs 59.3 %; p < 0.001) and in the patients whose pathologic T (pT) stage lower than 3 than in those whose T stage was 3 or higher (92.0 % vs 66.7 %; p = 0.009). The sensitivity of SLN mapping was 50 % in the patients with no LVI and 33 % in the patients with a pT stage lower than 3.

CONCLUSION

The study results showed that for patients with early-stage GC with no LVI, negative SLN findings may represent a potential additive predictor indicating the absence of regional LN metastasis. However, given the low sensitivity rates noted, further research is needed to identify specific patient populations that may benefit from SLN mapping in GC.

Long-term survival after repetitive lymphadenectomy for nodal recurrence of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a report of two cases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are rare, but their incidence has increased in recent years. Curative surgery is recommended in several global guidelines for resectable PNENs. Lymph node recurrence after R0 resection for PNENs is infrequent, and global guidelines recommend surgical resection for recurrence, if resectable. However, data on the prognosis after surgical resection for nodal recurrence of PNENs are limited. We herein report two cases in which long-term survival was achieved after repetitive lymphadenectomy for nodal recurrence of PNENs. In both cases, the pathological findings for primary PNEN showed well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms and R0 resection was successfully performed. The Ki-67 index increased with each resection in both cases. Both patients showed long-term survival (10 and 14 years, respectively). Repetitive lymphadenectomy for nodal recurrence of PNENs may improve patient prognosis.

A slowly-growing solitary skip lymph nodule of occult gastric cancer above the neck of pancreas: a case report

BACKGROUND

Skip lymphatic metastasis (SK) is an exceptional and characteristic pattern of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) with infrequent incidence. This is an extremely rare report of occult gastric cancer with solitary skip lymphatic metastasis as the initial and primary observation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old woman, who complained of epigastric discomfort for several years, presented a solitary nodule upon pancreas neck examination by CT without performance on the primary lesion, even gastroscopy. During the preoperative 4-month follow-up, the nodule stayed stable without any therapy. The postoperative pathological examination confirmed the consistent diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma between the nodule and the stomach lesion, which was found by preoperative random biopsy of the mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the concentration on vigilance to the SK of GC and a closer observation for intra-abdominal nodules, even radiological suspicion of a benign lesion.

Burgeoning study of sentinel-node analysis on management of early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) represents an organ-preserving alternative to surgical resection of early gastric cancer. However, even with ESD yielding en-bloc resection specimens, there are concerns regarding tumor spread such as with larger lesions, ulcerated lesions, undifferentiated pathology and submucosal invasion. Sentinel node navigational surgery (SNNS) when combined with ESD offers a minimally invasive alternative to the traditional extended gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy if lack of lymph node spread can be confirmed. This would have a clear advantage in terms of potential complications and quality of life. However, SNNS, though useful in other malignancies such as breast cancer and melanoma, may not have a sufficient sensitivity for malignancy and negative predictive value in EGC to justify this as standard practice after ESD. The results of SNNS may improve with greater standardization and more involved dissection, technological innovations and more experience and validation such that the paradigm for post-ESD resection of EGC may change and include SNNS.

Techniques and Current Role of Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Concept in Gastric Cancer Surgery

Gastric cancer patients represent a rather divergent patient group and in certain carefully selected cases of early forms of gastric cancer the D2 gastrectomy could be considered a more radical procedure than the biological and oncological characteristics of the primary tumor on the gastric wall would require. As any unnecessary dissection increases morbidity without always respective survival benefits, an approach that could accurately predict and actually dictate the exact extent of lymph node dissection would be ideal. It is more than logical the assumption that the standard D2 lymphadenectomy could represent an overtreatment in distinct patients groups such as patients with early gastric cancer with favorable pathological characteristics and clinically negative nodes not suitable for endoscopic treatment because this early stage disease shows limited lymph node metastasis incidence and excellent overall survival. Considering that the D2 gastrectomy has a negative impact on the quality of life of gastric cancer patients due to the post-gastrectomy functional results, a concept of a more targeted lymph node dissection, when appropriate, is certainly appealing. It is yet to be proven whether sentinel lymph node navigation surgery can fulfill such expectations providing the appropriate balance between morbidity and oncological safety in selected gastric cancer patients.

Prognostic Significance of Solitary Lymphnode Metastasis and Micrometastasis in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) used to be one of the most common malignancies in the world and still is the second leading cause of malignancy-related death in the Far East. The most significant factors that were found to be associated with the clinical outcome in patients with non-metastatic (M₀) gastric cancer is tumor's depth of invasion, the presence and the extend of lymphnode involvement, as well as the histological type according to Lauren (intestinal or diffuse). Although it is generally accepted that D2 gastrectomy is the procedure of choice to achieve adequate oncologic excision, there are quite many concerns for its use in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), where N_o or N₁ specimens are frequently reported. The last two decades, with the evolvement of cancer cell detection techniques, the attend of the medical community is focused on GC patients with solitary lymphnode metastasis (SLN) or micrometastasis (mM). There is a discussion whether SLN should be attributed as the “real” sentinel node (SN) and its projection on patients' survival. The aim of this study is to review the recent literature and attempt to clarify the clinical significance of SLN in gastric cancer.

Value and impact factors of multidetector computed tomography in diagnosis of preoperative lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) exhibited wide ranges of sensitivities and specificities for lymph node assessment of gastric cancer (GC) in several individual studies. This present meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the value of MDCT in diagnosis of preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) and to explore the impact factors that might explain the heterogeneity of its diagnostic accuracy in GC.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted to collect all the relevant studies about the value of MDCT in assessing LNM of GC within the PubMed, Cochrane library and Embase databases up to Feb 2, 2016. Two investigators independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of included studies. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under ROC curve (AUC) were pooled to estimate the overall accuracy of MDCT. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were carried out to identify the possible factors influencing the heterogeneity of the accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies with 6519 subjects were finally included. Overall, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.56-0.77), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89), respectively. Meta-regression revealed that MDCT section thickness, proportion of serosal invasion, and publication year were the main significant impact factors in sensitivity, and MDCT section thickness, multiplanar reformation (MPR), and reference standard were the main significant impact factors in specificity. After the included studies were divided into 2 groups (Group A: studies with proportion of serosa-invasive GC subjects ≥50%; Group B: studies with proportion of serosa-invasive GC subjects <50%), the pooled sensitivity in Group A was significantly higher than in Group B (0.84 [95% CI: 0.75-0.90] vs 0.55 [95% CI: 0.41-0.68], P < .01). For early gastric cancer (EGC), the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.34 (95% CI: 0.15-0.61), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95), and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86), respectively.

CONCLUSION

To summarize, MDCT tends to be adequate to assess preoperative LNM in serosa-invasive GC, but insufficient for non-serosa-invasive GC (particularly for EGC) owing to its low sensitivity. Proportion of serosa-invasive GC subjects, MDCT section thickness, MPR, and reference standard are the main factors influencing its diagnostic accuracy.

Lymph node mapping with carbon nanoparticles and the risk factors of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer

The study aimed to examine the applicability of carbon nanoparticles as a tracer for lymph node mapping and the related factors of lymph node and No.8p subgroup metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Clinical data of 50 patients with gastric cancer, who had not received treatment preoperatively and underwent gastrectomy in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Wuhan Union Hospital, between October 2014 and August 2015, were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were found to have no distant metastasis preoperatively. Thirty-five out of 50 patients were subjected to lymphatic mapping technique using carbon nanoparticles as the tracer, and the rest 15 cases did not experience the lymphatic mapping and served as controls. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate and false negative rate were calculated according to the number of lymph nodes, and the staining and metastasis condition of lymph nodes. The diagnostic value of carbon nanoparticles on metastatic lymph nodes was evaluated. The relationship between the metastasis of lymph nodes or subgroup No.8p lymph nodes and clinicopathologic features was analyzed by χ²-test or Fisher's exact test. All patients underwent D2 surgery (lymph node dissection including all the group 1 and group 2 nodes) plus the dissection of the subgroup No.8p lymph nodes. It was found that the average number of harvested lymph nodes in lymphatic mapping technique group (45.7±14.5) was greater than that in control group (39.2±11.7), but the difference was not significantly different (P=0.138>0.05). The success rate, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and false negative rate was 97%, 57%, 28%, 62% and 72% respectively. The metastasis of lymph nodes was correlated to the depth of cancer invasion (T stage) (P=0.004<0.05), and the metastasis of No.8p lymph nodes was correlated to the extent of lymph node involvement (N stage) (P=0.007<0.05). Six cases had lymph node metastasis in subgroup No.8p, and their TNM stages and clinical stages were as follows: T1N2M0 IIA, T3N3M0 IIIB, T4aN3M0 IIIC, T4aN3M0 IIIC, T4aN3M0 IIIC, and T4bN3M0 IIIC. In conclusion, our study indicated that carbon nanoparticles failed to show good selectivity for metastatic lymph nodes; the result of lymphatic mapping does not achieve a satisfactory performance; the incidence of lymph node metastasis may increase, accompanying with the increase of the depth of cancer invasion; No.8p lymph node metastasis tends to occur for gastric carcinoma patients with the extent of lymph node metastasis over N2 stage.

Prognostic impact of lymph node skip metastasis in Stage III colorectal cancer

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymph node skip metastasis (LNSM) in patients with Stage III colorectal cancer.

METHOD

Between April 2003 and December 2014, a total of 41 patients with lymph node skip metastasis (skip+) were compared with 86 patients with pericolic lymph node metastases [lymph node distribution (LND)1] and 57 patients with intermediate and/or main lymph node metastasis (LND2+3). All patients had radical D3 lymphadenectomy, performed either laparoscopically or as open surgery.

RESULTS

The frequency of pT1-2 stage cancer was significantly higher in the skip+ group than in the LND1 group (26.8% vs 5.8%, P = 0.001). The number of metastatic lymph nodes in the skip+ group was lower than in the LND2+3 group (1.9 ± 1.5 vs 6.5 ± 6.0, P < 0.001). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of the skip+, LND1 and LND2+3 groups was 64.8%, 69.7% and 40.1%, respectively (P = 0.008). The 3-year systemic recurrence rates of the skip+, LND1 and LND2+3 groups were 30.2%, 20.3% and 48.1%, respectively; (P = 0.002). Cox regression analysis revealed that preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) of ≥ 5 ng/ml [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.2, P = 0.029], poor differentiation (HR = 3.8, P = 0.001) and skip+ (HR = 0.2, P = 0.021) were independently prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis for the LND1-negative lymph node skip metastasis group was better than for the LND2+3 group and was comparable with that of the LND1 group after radical D3 lymphadenectomy.

Impact on long-term survival of the number of lymph nodes resected in patients with pT1N0 gastric cancer after R0 resection: A multicenter study in China

Although studies on the association between the number of lymph nodes resected and prognosis in patients with pT2-4N0 stages of gastric cancer have reported consistent results, there is no consensus on the optimal number of lymph nodes to be examined for pT1N0 stage gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of the number of lymph nodes removed on the outcomes of patients with pT1N0 stage gastric cancer after R0 resection.From December 2009 to December 2011, 227 patients undergoing R0 resection of pT1N0 stage gastric cancer at 4 Chinese centers were enrolled in this study. Patients were assigned to 2 groups according to the number of lymph nodes dissected (≤15 or > 15). Standard survival methods and restricted multivariable Cox regression models were applied.More women (P = 0.031) were in the ≤15 group than in the >15 group. The mean number of lymph nodes removed from women was greater than that from men (P = 0.007). The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the >15 lymph nodes resected group than the ≤15 group. The number of lymph nodes resected was identified as an independent prognostic factor and was significantly correlated with overall survival (OS).A lymphadenectomy with dissection of more than 15 lymph nodes improved the long-term survival of patients with pT1N0 gastric cancer after R0 resection. Therefore, it is necessary to consider removing more than 15 lymph nodes among such patients.

Skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: is it skipping or skipped?

BACKGROUND

Skip metastasis is the presence of a metastatic lymph node (LN) in an extraperigastric (EP) area without perigastric (PG) involvement. The mechanism and prognosis of skip metastasis are still unknown. The purpose of this study was to scrutinize the clinical significance of skip metastasis in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Data were reviewed from 6,025 patients who had undergone gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer. Patients were categorized as a PG-only group when the metastatic LNs were limited to only the PG area, as a PG + EP group if metastatic LNs extended to both the PG area and the EP area, and as a skip group if metastatic LNs were in the EP area but there were no metastatic LNs in the PG area.

RESULTS

After we had performed matching, the prognosis of the skip group was worse than that of the PG-only group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.54) and was similar to that of the PG + EP group (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.54, 95% confidence interval 0.92-2.59). The number of retrieved LNs was less in the skip group than in the other groups, especially from the PG area (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of the skip group was worse than that of the PG-only group and was similar to that of the PG + EP group when the tumor stage was considered. It is difficult to conclude whether skip metastasis is real skipping of cancer cells or a result of inadequate LN sampling. Further evaluation of LNs in the PG area of the skip group could provide more clues for the mechanism of skip metastasis.

Sentinel node navigation surgery for gastric cancer: Overview and perspective

The sentinel node (SN) technique has been established for the treatment of some types of solid cancers to avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomy. If node disease were diagnosed before surgery, minimal surgery with omission of lymph node dissection would be an option for patients with early gastric cancer. Although SN biopsy has been well ascertained in the treatment of breast cancer and melanoma, SN navigation surgery (SNNS) in gastric cancer has not been yet universal due to the complicated lymphatic flow from the stomach. Satisfactory establishment of SNNS will result in the possible indication of minimally invasive surgery of gastric cancer. However, the results reported in the literature on SN biopsy in gastric cancer are widely divergent and many issues are still to be resolved, such as the collection method of SN, detection of micrometastasis in SN, and clinical benefit. The difference in the procedural technique and learning phase of surgeons is also varied the accuracy of SN mapping. In this review, we outline the current status of application for SNNS in gastric cancer.

Clinical significance of skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

Given the recent increase in the incidence of early gastric cancer, there is greater interest in identifying a minimally invasive therapy. The purpose of this study was to analyze the patterns of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer and to elucidate the clinical significance of skip metastasis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patterns of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and clinicopathologic factors related to skip metastasis.

RESULTS

Among 2963 patients with gastric cancer, 997 patients (33.6%) were detected as having LNM, and 27 patients (2.7%) with skip metastasis were detected among 997 patients with LNM. Skip metastasis were detected more frequently in the elderly. Compared with the N1 group, the skip metastasis group showed lower frequency of vascular invasion, and compared with the stepwise N2 group, the skip metastasis group showed smaller tumor size and a significantly higher incidence of negative lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently there is no way to predict N2 station LNM including skip metastasis, D2 LN dissection for gastric cancer is thought to be the appropriate treatment, even during early stage disease. Minimally invasive therapy should be performed cautiously in consideration of possible skip metastasis.

Characterization of lymph node metastasis and its clinical significance in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer

This study aimed to characterize lymph node metastasis and determine its clinical significance in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. The medical charts of 920 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical surgical resection between March, 2010 and March, 2013, were retrospectively reviewed and statistically analyzed. Lymphatic metastasis was observed in 69.6% of the patients (640/920). The frequency of lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage gastric cancer was 21.4% (18/84). Lymph node metastasis was observed in all the patients with stage IIIC-IV gastric cancer. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was higher among patients with tumors >7 cm in size. The most frequently affected lymph nodes in patients with proximal, central and distal gastric cancer were station no. 1 (34.2%), no. 3 (33.8%) and no. 6 (34.3%) lymph nodes, respectively. The frequency of lymph node metastasis in patients with Borrmann type IV cancer was significantly higher compared to that in patients with other Borrmann type cancers. Our study further demonstrated that lymphatic metastasis is closely correlated with TNM stage, location, depth of invasion and size of gastric tumors. Therefore, we recommend that a sufficient number of lymph nodes be examined from each patient to determine the extent of lymph node dissection based on Borrmann type, location, size, depth of invasion and histology of the cancer.

Prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and solitary lymph node metastasis

AIM: To investigate the relationship of solitary lymph node metastasis (SLNM) and age with patient survival in gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS: The medical records databases of China’s Beijing Cancer Hospital at the Peking University School of Oncology and Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital affiliated to Tongji University were searched retrospectively to identify patients with histologically proven GC and SLNM who underwent surgical resection between October 2003 and December 2012. Patients with distant metastasis or gastric stump carcinoma following resection for benign disease were excluded from the analysis. In total, 936 patients with GC + SLNM were selected for analysis and the recorded parameters of clinicopathological disease and follow-up (range: 13-2925 d) were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to stratify patients by age (≤ 50 years-old, n = 198; 50-64 years-old, n = 321; ≥ 65 years-old, n = 446) and by metastatic lymph node ratio [MLR < 0.04 (1/25), n = 180; 0.04-0.06 (1/25-1/15), n = 687; ≥ 0.06 (1/15), n = 98] for 5-year survival analysis. The significance of intergroup differences between the survival curves was assessed by a log-rank test.

RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate of the entire GC + SLNM patient population was 49.9%. Stratification analysis showed significant differences in survival time (post-operative days) according to age: ≤ 50 years-old: 950.7 ± 79.0 vs 50-64 years-old: 1697.8 ± 65.9 vs≥ 65 years-old: 1996.2 ± 57.6, all P < 0.05. In addition, younger age (≤ 50 years-old) correlated significantly with mean survival time (r = 0.367, P < 0.001). Stratification analysis also indicated an inverse relationship between increasing MLR and shorter survival time: < 0.04: 52.8% and 0.04-0.06: 51.1% vs≥ 0.06: 40.5%, P < 0.05. The patients with the shortest survival times and rates were younger and had a high MLR (≥ 0.06): ≤ 50 years-old: 496.4 ± 133.0 and 0.0% vs 50-65 years-old: 1180.9 ± 201.8 and 21.4% vs≥ 65 years-old: 1538.4 ± 72.4 and 37.3%, all P < 0.05. The same significant trend in shorter survival times and rates for younger patients was seen with the mid-range MLR group (0.04-0.06), but the difference between the two older groups was not significant. No significant differences were found between the age groups of patients with MLR < 0.04. Assessment of clinicopathological parameters identified age group, Borrmann type, histological type and tumor depth as the most important predictors of the survival rates and times observed for this study population.

CONCLUSION: GC patients below 51 years of age with MLR of SLNM above 0.06 have shorter life expectancy than their older counterparts.

Analysis of the lymphatic stream to predict sentinel nodes in gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the pattern of lymphatic drainage in gastric cancer patients to predict sentinel node placement according to tumor location.

METHODS

A total of 462 pT1 or T2 gastric adenocarcinoma patients with metastasis to 1-3 lymph nodes (LNs) who had undergone lymphadenectomy greater than D1+β were included in the study. The distribution of metastatic LNs was evaluated according to tumor longitudinal and circumferential location. The incidence rate of atypical metastasis (skip or transversal metastasis) and related clinicopathologic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The rates of skip and transversal metastasis were 15.8 % (73 of 462) and 10.3 % (23 of 224), respectively. Atypical metastasis was observed regardless of tumor location. Tumors that showed the most frequent atypical metastasis were located in the lower third and lesser curvature (LC) of the stomach (29.0 % for skip metastasis and 18.0 % for transversal metastasis). In uni- and multivariate analyses, an LC tumor was a risk factor for skip metastasis, and tumor located circumferentially in the LC or longitudinally in the lower third of the stomach was an independent risk factor for transversal metastasis. There was no correlation between tumor aggressiveness and atypical metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumors at any location had a chance of atypical metastasis; however, those located longitudinally in the lower or circumferentially at the LC had a significantly higher chance of atypical metastasis compared to other locations. When sentinel node navigation surgery is applied, special care should be taken with tumors at these locations to prevent false-negative results.

Lymph node, peritoneal and bone marrow micrometastases in gastric cancer: Their clinical significance

The 7th TNM classification clearly states that micrometastases detected by morphological techniques (HE stain and immunohistochemistry) should always be reported and calculated in the staging of the disease (pN1mi or M1), while patients in whom micrometastases are detected by non-morphological techniques (e.g., flow cytometry, reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) should still be classified as N0 or M0. In gastric cancer patients, micrometastases have been detected in lymph nodes, the peritoneal cavity and bone marrow. However, the clinical implications and/or their prognostic significance are still a matter of debate. Current literature suggests that lymph node micrometastases should be encountered for the loco-regional staging of the disease, while skip lymph node micrometastases should also be encountered in the total number of infiltrated lymph nodes. Peritoneal fluid cytology examination should be obligatorily performed in pT3 or pT4 tumors. A positive cytology classifies gastric cancer patients as stage IV. Although a curative resection is not precluded, these patients face an overall dismal prognosis. Whether patients with a positive cytology should be treated similarly to patients with macroscopic peritoneal recurrence should be evaluated further. Gastric cancer cells are detected with high incidence in the bone marrow. However, the published results make comparison of data between groups almost impossible due to severe methodological problems. If these methodological problems are overcome in the future, specific target therapies may be designed for specific groups of patients.

Prognostic significance of lymph node station 7 for patients with gastric cancers underwent radical surgery

BACKGROUND

To investigate the validity of gastric cancers with nodes metastasis at Level II stations limited to No. 7 being classified as level-based n1 stage disease and the impact of this revision on lymph node staging.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of 1,606 node positive gastric cancers were retrospectively reviewed. Four patient groups were classified according to the status of node involvement: Group A, 734 patients with node metastasis at Level I stations; Group B, 317 patients with nodes metastasis at Level II stations limited to No. 7; Group C, 501 patients with nodes metastasis at Level II stations besides No. 7; and Group D, 54 patients with nodes metastasis at Level III stations.

RESULTS

Although the extent of node metastasis for patients in Group B was more severe than that for patients in Group A, clinicopathologic features (especially pT stage) were not significantly different. Although overall survival for patients in Group B was significantly worse than that for patients in Group A, no significant differences in prognosis could be observed when stratified by pN or rN category. A revised level-based n category was established by considering cancers in Group B as level-based n1 stage disease. Multivariate analysis confirmed rN category and the revised level-based n category independently predicted patients' survival. A novel N category was established by combining rN category and the revised level-based n category. Further analysis revealed the novel N category had better homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients than the other node categories, indicating the novel N system might be the most valuable node staging system for prognostic assessment.

CONCLUSION

It might be more suitable for cancers in Group B being classified as level-based n1 stage disease. And we recommend the anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes also being considered in the categorization of lymph node metastasis.

A novel insight of sentinel lymph node concept based on 1-3 positive nodes in patients with pT1-2 gastric cancer

Background

Sentinel node (SN) biopsy has been practiced in gastric cancer in recent years, and many studies focused on the distribution of solitary lymph node metastasis (SLM) to assess the pattern of SN. In fact, there is usually more than one SN existing in gastric cancer. The distribution of SNs needs to be further re-evaluated.

Methods

A total of 289 patients in pT1-2 stage with 1-3 positive nodes confined to same compartment were included in this study with informed consents. The primary lesion was solitary (≤ 5.0 cm in diameter) and D2 or D3 lymph node dissection had been performed. The location of metastatic lymph nodes was analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Most positive nodes occurred in N1 compartment, with frequency of 79.6% to 85.7% based on site of tumor. In the lower third of stomach, no. 6 was the most common metastatic site and no. 3 was the second; the order was reversed for SLM. With increasing depth of tumor invasion, a progressively augmented nodal involvement was shown. Nearly a half appeared transverse metastasis when the tumor located at the lesser or greater curvature. Among skip metastasis, no. 7, 8a, 9 and 11p were the most common metastatic sites and the prognosis was as similar as that of patients with N1 involved only.

Conclusions

The 1-3 positive nodes in the same compartment should be possible SNs, and most of which are restricted in N1 in pT1-2 gastric cancer. Transversal and 2 stations lymph node metastasis are common.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in gastric cancer: possible applications and limits

AIMS

To explore the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with clinical T1 and T2 N0 M0 gastric cancer less than 5 cm in diameter underwent SLN biopsy with the intraoperative Patent blue method. The procedure continued with radical gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy. We investigated all technical aspects of the blue dye technique and determined the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the SLN technique.

RESULTS

SLNs were detected in 28 of 29 patients; the total number of excised SLNs was 45, with a median of two (range 1-3). Seventeen patients had metastatic SLN, with 21 lymph nodes retrieved. Twenty-two patients had SLNs located at the first level. Four patients had SLNs at the second level, one at the first and second levels, and one at the first and third levels. Five patients had false negative SLNs. The ability of SLN biopsy to predict the status of the other lymph nodes was summarised by an accuracy of 75%, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value of 88%, and a negative predictive value of 55%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that pick-up SLN biopsy in gastric cancer is technically feasible but has very low sensitivity. Regarding the utility of SLN navigation when attempting to detect the nodal basin, the high rate of false negative SLNs and lymph node level jumping warrant further studies with a large accrual before the method can be introduced into daily practice.

Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy

AIM: To investigate the prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio (rN) on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy.

METHODS: A total of 634 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection (R0) of lymph nodes at distal gastrectomy in 1995-2004. Correlations between positive nodes and retrieved nodes, between rN and retrieved nodes, and between rN and negative lymph node (LN) count were analyzed respectively. Prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Staging accuracy of the pN category (5th UICC/TNM system) and the rN category was compared according to the survival rates of patients. A linear regression model was used to identify the relation between rN and 5-year survival rate of the patients.

RESULTS: The number of dissected LNs was related with metastatic LNs but not related with rN. Cox regression analysis showed that depth of invasion, pN and rN category were the independent predictors of survival (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in survival between LN stages classified by the rN category or by the pN category (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found in survival rate between LN stages classified by the pN category or by the rN category (P > 0.05). Linear regression model showed a significant linear correlation between rN and the 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer patients (β = 0.862, P < 0.001). Pearson’s correlation test revealed that negative LN count was negatively correlated with rN (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: rN category is a better prognostic tool than the 5th UICC pN category for gastric cancer patients after curative distal gastrectomy. Increased negative LN count can reduce rN and improve the survival rate of gastric cancer patients.

Current status of sentinel lymph node biopsy in adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, gastric cardia, and proximal stomach

The resection of the adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction should be considered to the extent of the lymphatic drainage. This, on the other hand, depends on the possible lymphatic metastasizing. As an adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is located along the borderline between two visceral cavities (mediastinal/abdominal), it can, in principle, metastasize in both cavities. There is not, however, an imaging (CT, MRI, PET) that can adequately assure the detection of a beginning lymph node metastasis in particular. The sentinel lymph node biopsy could provide the beginning of a solution in this case. The initial results, with all of the necessary accompanying technical work, have been encouraging. The paper presented here provides an introduction to the challenge of the SLNB and the background of a specialized surgical therapy of the AEG. If a lymph nodal metastasis can be definitely confirmed or ruled out, many patients could be spared an unnecessary lymphadenectomy. This is especially important at the AEG because minimizing the evasiveness of the surgery with adequate radical oncological resection (e.g., without thoracotomy) would mean a substantial reduction of postoperative mortality.

Routine modified D2 lymphadenectomy performance in pT1-T2N0 gastric cancer

AIM: To evaluate routine modified D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer, based on immunohistochemically detected skip micrometastases in level II lymph nodes.

METHODS: Among 95 gastric cancer patients who were routinely submitted to curative modified D2 lymphadenectomy, from January 2004 to December 2008, 32 were classified as pN0. All level I lymph nodes of these 32 patients were submitted to immunohistochemistry for micrometastases detection. Patients in whom micrometastases were detected in the level I lymph node stations (n = 4) were excluded from further analysis. The level II lymph nodes of the remaining 28 patients were studied immunohistochemically for micrometastases detection and constitute the material of the present study.

RESULTS: Skip micrometastases in the level II lymph nodes were detected in 14% (4 out of 28) of the patients. The incidence was further increased to 17% (4 out of 24) in the subgroup of T1-2 gastric cancer patients. All micrometastases were detected in the No. 7 lymph node station. Thus, the disease was upstaged from stage IA to IB in one patient and from stage IB to II in three patients.

CONCLUSION: In gastric cancer, true R0 resection may not be achieved without modified D2 lymphadenectomy. Until D2+/D3 lymphadenectomy becomes standard, modified D2 lymphadenectomy should be performed routinely.

Prognostic impact of dissected lymph node count on patients with node-negative gastric cancer

AIM: To investigate the long-term effect of the number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) on the prognosis of patients with node-negative gastric cancer.

METHODS: Clinical data of 211 patients with gastric cancer, without nodal involvement, were analyzed retrospectively after D2 radical operation. We analyzed the relationship between the number of resected LNs with the 5-year survival, the recurrence rate and the post-operative complication rate.

RESULTS: The 5-year survival of the entire cohort was 82.2%. The total number of dissected LNs was one of the independent prognostic factors. Among patients with comparable depth of invasion, the larger the number of resected LNs, the better the survival (P < 0.05). A cut-point analysis provided the possibility to detect a significant survival difference among subgroups. Patients had a better long-term survival outcomes with LN counts ≥ 15 for pT1-2, ≥ 20 for pT3-4, and ≥ 15 for the entire cohort. The overall recurrence rate was 29.4% within 5 years after surgery. There was a statistically significant, negative correlation between the number of resected LNs and the recurrence rate (P < 0.01). The post-operative complication rate was 10.9% and was not significantly correlated with the number of dissected LNs (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: For node-negative gastric cancer, sufficient number of dissected LNs is recommended during D2 lymphadenectomy, to improve the long-term survival and reduce the recurrence. Suitable increments of the dissected LN count would not increase the post-operative complication rate.

Sentinel node mapping and skip metastases in patients with early gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to identify the characteristics of patients with early gastric cancers that have skip metastases.

BACKGROUND

The possibility of lymph node metastasis is the most important factor to consider when deciding on the resection procedure for patients with early gastric cancer.

METHODS

From February 2003 through July 2008, 739 patients with early gastric adenocarcinoma underwent gastric resection at the National Cancer Center, Korea, and were included in this study. Patients with skip metastases were analyzed and compared with those without skip metastases.

RESULTS

Skip metastases were found in 2.8% of patients with early gastric cancer. Tumor size and the presence of lymphatic invasion were associated with skip metastases by both univariate and multivariate analysis. All skip metastases were metastases to the extraperigastric lymph nodes that skipped across the perigastric lymph nodes. Sixteen patients (66.7%) with these metastases had metastatic lymph nodes at No. 7, 8, and 9 stations.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size should be considered during sentinel lymph node mapping to prevent false-negative results in patients with early gastric cancer. If sentinel nodes are not found in the perigastric lymph nodes, No. 7, 8, and 9 stations should be explored for prevention of false-negative sentinel node mapping results.