Comparison of Complications Following Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placements

Safety of elective enteral access in elderly patients: a comparative analysis of perioperative risk

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients can experience torpid hospitalization that is often characterized by malnutrition. In this setting, enteral feeding may facilitate improvement in nutritional status. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes between elderly (age of ≥65 years old) and nonelderly (age of <65 years old) patients undergoing elective enteral access placement.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent enteral access procedures between 2018 and 2020 at a tertiary care facility were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in baseline characteristics between nonelderly and elderly patients were adjusted using entropy-balanced weights. Subsequently, multivariate logistic and linear regression models were developed to evaluate the association between elderly status and outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Overall, 914 patients with enteral access met the inclusion criteria, of whom 471 (51.5%) were elderly. Elderly patients more commonly received percutaneous gastrostomy and had a higher burden of comorbidities as measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index than nonelderly patients. Multivariate risk adjustment generated a strongly balanced distribution of baseline covariates between patient groups. After adjustment, despite no significant association with inhospital mortality, reoperation, or time to feeding goals, elderly status was linked to an approximately 8-day reduction in length of stay (95% CI, -14.28 to -2.30; P = .007) and significantly lower odds of total parenteral nutrition (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94; P = .026) and nonelective readmission (AOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86; P = .003). In addition, elderly status was associated with significantly greater odds of nonhome discharge (AOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.17-2.13; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Despite having more comorbidities than their nonelderly counterparts, elderly patients experienced favorable nutritional and perioperative outcomes after enteral access placement.

Gastrostomy Tube Outcomes Among Surgical and Non-Surgical Services: A Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to evaluate differences in baseline characteristics, complications, and mortality among patients receiving a gastrostomy tube (GT) by surgical or non-surgical services.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent GT placement from 2014 to 2017 at a single institution. Using bivariate and multivariable analyses, we compared baseline characteristics, complications, and overall 30-day mortality of patients undergoing GT placement with surgical or non-surgical services.

RESULTS

Of the 1339 adults who underwent GT placement, surgical and non-surgical services performed 45% (n = 609) and 55% (n = 730) procedures, respectively. Gastrostomy tube-related complications were similar (29.6% surgical vs 28.8% non-surgical, P = .76). Thirty-day mortality was higher among non-surgical services (23.7% vs 16.5%, P = .004). On multivariable analysis, this was not significant (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.83; 1.77).

CONCLUSION

Surgical and non-surgical service placement of GTs had equivalent GT-related mortality and complication rates.

Laparoscopic tubularized continent gastrostomy: an alternative to tube gastrostomies

Gastrostomy tubes, placed either endoscopically or laparoscopically, are the most widely used method to deliver enteral feeding to patients unable to be fed by mouth. Tube gastrostomy is quick and low cost and allows the health care professionals for a convenient route to deliver enteral nutrition to their patients. Nevertheless, bearing an indwelling gastric tube could not be as convenient for patients. Complications, such as bowel perforation, tube dislodgement, peristomal infection or bleeding occur in up to 17% of patients, and some other drawbacks of gastric tubes, such as peristomal pain, are often understated. We present our technique for laparoscopic creation of a tubularized continent gastrostomy, originally conceived for the emergency treatment of patients with a dislodged percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, to provide them with a reliable new route for gastric feeding. After healing, this gastrostomy does not need an indwelling tube to stay patent, requires only a light gauze dressing and can be used by intermittent catheterization at conventional feeding times during the day. Laparoscopic tubularized continent gastrostomy can be offered to patients as a reliable alternative to tube gastrostomy.

Percutaneous Transesophageal Access for Enteral Feeding Tube Placement

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to describe our experience with percutaneous transesophageal enteral feeding tube placement when percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement is not feasible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed from July 2018 to March 2019. Thirteen patients (9 females, 4 males), (age range 22-80 years; mean age, 55 years; mean body mass index of 24.6) underwent placement of 14 percutaneous transesophageal enteral feeding tubes. Relative contraindications to standard gastrostomy tube placement included: prior gastric surgery (5 patients), severe contractures/large body habitus (2), abdominal mesh (1), high riding stomach (1), interposition of bowel (1), ascites (1), and refractory gastrostomy tract leak (1). Patients were evaluated for functionality of the tube, complications, and patients' satisfaction with physical examination at 24 h, review of electronic medical record and phone interviews at 1 month, and 3-month follow-up. Complications were classified according to the CIRSE guidelines.

RESULTS

Technical success rate was 100% with placement of seven percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy tubes and seven percutaneous transesophageal jejunostomy tubes. One patient underwent tube placement twice after dislodgement. At 3-month follow-up, two patients had died, one patient was lost to follow-up, and 11 patients had properly working tubes. No major complications occurred. Minor complication rate was 43% (6/14). Patient's satisfaction scores ranged from "poor" 2/11 (18%) or "neutral" 4/11 (36.4%) to "satisfied/very satisfied" 5/11 (45.3%).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous transesophageal enteral feeding tube placement is feasible with a low complication rate. A majority of patients were either satisfied or neutral with the transesophageal enteral tube.