Minimally Invasive Approach in the Setting of ALPPS Procedure: a Systematic Review of the Literature

Current Perspectives and Progress in Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization with Stem Cell Augmentation (PVESA)

Portal vein embolization with stem cell augmentation (PVESA) is an emerging approach for enhancing the growth of the liver segment that will remain after surgery (i.e., future liver remnant, FLR) in patients with liver cancer. Conventional portal vein embolization (PVE) aims to induce preoperative FLR growth, but it has a risk of failure in patients with underlying liver dysfunction and comorbid illnesses. PVESA combines PVE with stem cell therapy to potentially improve FLR size and function more effectively and efficiently. Various types of stem cells can help improve liver growth by secreting paracrine signals for hepatocyte growth or by transforming into hepatocytes. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), unrestricted somatic stem cells, and small hepatocyte-like progenitor cells have been used to augment liver growth in preclinical animal models, while clinical studies have demonstrated the benefit of CD133 + bone marrow-derived MSCs and hematopoietic stem cells. These investigations have shown that PVESA is generally safe and enhances liver growth after PVE. However, optimizing the selection, collection, and application of stem cells remains crucial to maximize benefits and minimize risks. Additionally, advanced stem cell technologies, such as priming, genetic modification, and extracellular vesicle-based therapy, that could further enhance efficacy outcomes should be evaluated. Despite its potential, PVESA requires more investigations, particularly mechanistic studies that involve orthotopic animal models of liver cancer with concomitant liver injury as well as larger human trials.

Robotic ALPPS for primary and metastatic liver tumours: short-term outcomes versus open approach

Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is one of the strategies available for patients initially unresectable. High risk of peri-operative morbidity and mortality limited its application and diffusion. We aimed to analyse short-term outcomes of robotic ALPPS versus open approach, to assess safety and reproducibility of this technique. A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia on patients that underwent ALPPS between January 2015 and September 2022 was conducted. The main aim of the study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of robotic approach, either full robotic or only first-stage robotic, compared to a control group of patients who underwent open ALPPS in the same Institution. 23 patients were included. Nine patients received a full open ALPPS (O-ALPPS), 7 received a full robotic ALPPS (R-ALPPS), and 7 underwent a robotic approach for stage 1, followed by an open approach for stage 2 (R + O-ALPPS). PHLF grade B-C after stage 1 was 0% in all groups, rising to 58% in the R + O-ALPPS group after stage 2 and remaining 0% in the R-ALPPS group. 86% of R-ALPPS cases were discharged from the hospital between stages 1 and 2, and median total in-hospital stay and ICU stay favoured full robotic approach as well. This contemporary study represents the largest series of robotic ALPPS, showing potential advantages from full robotic ALPPS over open approach, resulting in reduced hospital stay and complications and lower incidence of 90-day mortality.

Laparoscopic Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (L-ALPPS) After Conversion Therapy for BCLC-B Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Video Article

BACKGROUND

Despite the ALPPS technique remains a controversy, various ALPPS techniques have made many attempts.1-6 This video discusses the technical tips for L-ALPPS after conversion therapy.

METHODS

A 56-year-old, HCC patient who performed the abdominal CT showed a 6.0*5.7-cm-sized mass with intrahepatic metastasis. After four cycles of conversion therapy, the patient achieved a radiologic complete response. However, the standardized, remnant liver volume ratio (SRLVR) was only 34%. Thus, L-ALPPS was contemplated.

RESULTS

After full mobilization, intraoperative ultrasonography marked the main trunk of MHV. The concept of "Laennec membrane anatomy" was introduced.7 The anterior pedicle (AP) and the posterior pedicle (PP) were elastically suspended along the Laennec membrane. The conventional hilar dissection approach was used to isolate and suspend RHA and the right portal vein (RPV). Then, IRHV and short hepatic vein were clipped and cut. The Pringle maneuver was used intermittently during the parenchymal transection. Hepatic resection was performed from the caudal to the cranial side along MHV after RPV was ligated. The RHV was elastically suspended after hepatic resection. The omentum was used to cover the resection surface. Stage 2, preoperative SRLVR increased to 68.3%. The adhesion of the right hemiliver was bluntly separated. AP, PP, and RHV were divided by the stapler respectively. Operation time and bleeding volume for stage-1 surgery and stage-2 surgery were 240 min and 80 min, 200 ml and 250 ml, respectively. The postoperative recovery was uneventful.

CONCLUSIONS

L-ALPPS as a surgical option seems to be feasible and safe for intermediate-advanced HCC after conversion therapy.

Liver Venous Deprivation for Rapid Liver Hypertrophy Before Major Hepatectomy: A Case Report

Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is an emerging, minimally invasive strategy to induce rapid liver hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) before a major hepatectomy. LVD (aka "double vein embolization") entails same-session percutaneous embolization of the portal and hepatic veins of the planned liver resection. This report discusses LVD's utilization and technical challenges in managing a 49-year-old male with recurrent multifocal colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The patient initially underwent neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy followed by a simultaneous laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy and liver surgery (microwave ablation of segment V and wedge resections of segment one and IVb), followed by completion of chemotherapy. The patient had an R0 resection with clear colon and liver surgical margins. Nine months after the initial surgery, the patient had a rise in tumor markers, and surveillance imaging demonstrated recurrence of liver metastases in segments I and V. LVD was performed by interventional radiology, which led to a 28% increase in FLR (segments II, III, and IV); initially measuring 464 cm3 before LVD and measuring 594 cm3 on post-procedure day 21. The patient underwent right hemi-hepatectomy and caudate resection on post-procedure day 29. The patient did not have any complications and was discharged on postoperative day 6. The patient remains disease-free with no evidence of recurrence at 12 months follow-up.

International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023

The robotic liver resection (RLR) has been increasingly applied in recent years and its benefits shown in some aspects owing to the technical advancement of robotic surgical system, however, controversies still exist. Based on the foundation of the previous consensus statement, this new consensus document aimed to update clinical recommendations and provide guidance to improve the outcomes of RLR clinical practice. The guideline steering group and guideline expert group were formed by 29 international experts of liver surgery and evidence-based medicine (EBM). Relevant literature was reviewed and analyzed by the evidence evaluation group. According to the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, the Guidance Principles of Development and Amendment of the Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment in China 2022, a total of 14 recommendations were generated. Among them were 8 recommendations formulated by the GRADE method, and the remaining 6 recommendations were formulated based on literature review and experts' opinion due to insufficient EBM results. This international experts consensus guideline offered guidance for the safe and effective clinical practice and the research direction of RLR in future.

Proceedings of the 27th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society

After a virtual congress in 2021 and a previous absence in 2020 because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the 27th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society was held from May 4 to 7, 2022, in a hybrid format in Istanbul, with 1123 (58% on-site) liver transplant professionals from 61 countries attending the meeting. The hybrid format successfully achieved a balance of much yearned-for "in-person interaction" and global online participation. Almost 500 scientific abstracts were presented. In this report, the Vanguard Committee aims to present a summary of key invited lectures and selected abstracts for the liver transplant community.

Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Right or Extended Right Hemi Hepatectomy Following Modulation of the Future Liver Remnant in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review

Background: Major hepatectomies after future liver remnant (FLR) modulation are technically demanding procedures, especially when performed as minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to assess current evidence regarding the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomies after FLR modulation. Materials and Methods: The Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for studies involving laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomies after FLR modulation, from their inception to December 2021. Two reviewers independently selected eligible articles and assessed their quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted from the included studies and summarized. Results: Six studies were included. In these studies, the median length of stay after the second stage ranged from 4.5 to 15.5 days and postoperative complication rates between 4.5% and 42.8%. Overall, 7.4% of patients developed liver failure, and 90-day mortality occurred in 3.2% of patients. The R0 resection rate was 93.5%. Only one study reported long-term outcomes, describing comparable 3-year overall survival rates following laparoscopic and open surgery (80% versus 54%, P = .154). Conclusions: The current evidence is scarce, but it suggests that in experienced centers, laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomy, following FLR modulation, is a safe and feasible procedure.

Evolution of minimally invasive techniques and surgical outcomes of ALPPS in Italy: a comprehensive trend analysis over 10 years from a national prospective registry

BACKGROUND

Since 2012, Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has encountered several modifications of its original technique. The primary endpoint of this study was to analyze the trend of ALPPS in Italy over a 10-year period. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate factors affecting the risk of morbidity/mortality/post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF).

METHODS

Data of patients submitted to ALPPS between 2012 and 2021 were identified from the ALPPS Italian Registry and evaluation of time trends was performed.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2021, a total of 268 ALPPS were performed within 17 centers. The number of ALPPS divided by the total number of liver resections performed by each center slightly declined (APC = - 2.0%, p = 0.111). Minimally invasive (MI) approach significantly increased over the years (APC = + 49.5%, p = 0.002). According to multivariable analysis, MI completion of stage 1 was protective against 90-day mortality (OR = 0.05, p = 0.040) as well as enrollment within high-volume centers for liver surgery (OR = 0.32, p = 0.009). Use of interstage hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and biliary tumors were independent predictors of PHLF.

CONCLUSIONS

This national study showed that use of ALPPS only slightly declined over the years with an increased use of MI techniques, leading to lower 90-day mortality. PHLF still remains an open issue.

Current status of minimally invasive liver surgery for cancers

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have chronic liver disease with functional deterioration and multicentric oncogenicity. Liver surgeries for the patients should be planned on both oncological effects and sparing liver function. In colorectal patients with post-chemotherapy liver injury and multiple bilateral tumors, handling multiple tumors in a fragile/easy-to-bleed liver is an important issue. Liver surgery for biliary tract cancers is often performed as a resection of large-volume functioning liver with extensive lymphadenectomy and bile duct resection/reconstruction. Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for HCC is applied with the advantages of laparoscopic for cases of cirrhosis or repeat resections. Small anatomical resections using the Glissonian, indocyanine green-guided, and hepatic vein-guided approaches are under discussion. In many cases of colorectal liver metastases, MILS is applied combined with chemotherapy owing to its advantage of better hemostasis. Two-stage hepatectomy and indocyanine green-guided tumor identification for multiple bilateral tumors are under discussion. In the case of biliary tract cancers, MILS with extensive lymphadenectomy and bile duct resection/reconstruction are developing. A robot-assisted procedure for dissection of major vessels and handling fragile livers may have advantages, and well-simulated robot-assisted procedure may decrease the difficulty for biliary tract cancers.

Individualized Selection Criteria Based on Tumor Burden in Future Remnant Liver for Staged Hepatectomy of Advanced CRLM: Conventional TSH or ALPPS

Staged hepatectomy is a promising strategy for curative resection of advanced colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) to prevent inadequate future remnant liver (FRL). However, the selection criteria for conventional two-stage hepatectomy (cTSH) and associating liver partitioning and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) remain unclear. This study aimed to propose a selection criterion for determining the optimal staged hepatectomy for patients with advanced CRLM. A selection criterion based on the degree of metastatic tumors within the FRL was established to determine staged hepatectomy approaches. Generally, ALPPS is recommended for patients with ≤3 metastatic nodules and whose nodules do not measure >3 cm in the FRL. cTSH is performed for patients whose tumor burden in FRL beyond the selection criteria. Data of 37 patients who underwent staged hepatectomy and curative intent of CRLM were analyzed. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of the two approaches were compared. Overall, cTSH and ALPPS were performed for 27 (73.0%) and 10 (27.0%) patients, respectively. Of those, 20 patients in the cTSH group and all patients in the ALPPS group had completed staged hepatectomy. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 91.6%, 62.4%, and 45.4% for all patients, respectively. The outcomes of patients who had successfully completed the staged hepatectomy were significantly better than those of other patients who failed to achieve staged hepatectomy. However, no significant difference was observed in the overall survival of patients who underwent staged hepatectomy between the two groups, but those in the ALPPS group had 100% survival at the end of this study. The individualized selection criteria based on tumor burden in the FRL that could balance the operative risk and oncologic outcome appear to be a promising strategy for achieving complete staged hepatectomy in patients with advanced CRLM.

Evolution of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy from 2012 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis. Review

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has become increasingly popular during the past few decades, and its indications have extended from patients with normal liver to post-chemotherapy patients and even patients with cirrhosis. However, few studies have assessed the publications in relation to ALPPS.

METHODS

Web of Science was searched to identify studies related to ALPPS published from 2012 to 2021. The analysis was performed using the bibliometric package (Version 3.1.0) in R software.

RESULTS

In total, 486 publications were found. These articles were published in 159 journals and authored by 2157 researchers from 694 organizations. The most prolific journal was Annals of Surgery (24 articles and 1170 citations). The most frequently cited article was published in Annals of Surgery (average citations, 72.7; total citations, 727). China was the most productive country for ALPPS publications but had comparatively less interaction with other countries. Both thematic evolution and co-occurrence network analysis showed low numbers of topics such as failure, resection, and safety among the publications but large numbers of highly cited papers on outcomes, prediction, mechanisms, multicenter analysis, and novel procedures such as liver venous deprivation. A total of 196 studies focused the clinical application of ALPPS, and most studies were IDEAL Stages I and II. The specific mechanism of ALPPS liver regeneration remains unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first bibliometric analysis offering an overview of the development of ALPPS research publications. Our findings identified prominent studies, countries, institutions, journals, and authors to indicate the future direction of ALPPS research. The role of ALPPS in liver regeneration and the long-term results of ALPPS need further study. Future research directions include comparison of ALPPS with portal vein embolization, liver venous deprivation, and other two-stage hepatectomies as well as patients' quality of life after ALPPS.

Pure laparoscopic major liver resection after yttrium90 radioembolization: a case-matched series analysis of feasibility and outcomes

Background

Liver surgery after radioembolization (RE) entails highly demanding and challenging procedures due to the frequent combination of large tumors, severe RE-related adhesions, and the necessity of conducting major hepatectomies. Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and its associated advantages could provide benefits, as yet unreported, to these patients. The current study evaluated feasibility, morbidity, mortality, and survival outcomes for major laparoscopic liver resection after radioembolization.

Material and methods

In this retrospective, single-center study patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or metastases from colorectal cancer undergoing major laparoscopic hepatectomy after RE were identified from institutional databases. They were matched (1:2) on several pre-operative characteristics to a group of patients that underwent major LLR for the same malignancies during the same period but without previous RE.

Results

From March 2011 to November 2020, 9 patients underwent a major LLR after RE. No differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss (50 vs. 150 ml; p = 0.621), operative time (478 vs. 407 min; p = 0.135) or pedicle clamping time (90.5 vs 74 min; p = 0.133) between the post-RE LLR and the matched group. Similarly, no differences were observed on hospital stay (median 3 vs. 4 days; p = 0.300), Clavien–Dindo ≥ III complications (2 vs. 1 cases; p = 0.250), specific liver morbidity (1 vs. 1 case p = 1.000), or 90 day mortality (0 vs. 0; p = 1.000).

Conclusion

The laparoscopic approach for post radioembolization patients may be a feasible and safe procedure with excellent surgical and oncological outcomes and meets the current standards for laparoscopic liver resections. Further studies with larger series are needed to confirm the results herein presented.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02474-z.

Synchronous Two-Stage Hepatectomy With Associated Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation in Addition to Low Anterior Resection for Metastatic Rectal Cancer

The associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for a staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure is an excellent treatment strategy for patients with advanced primary or metastatic liver cancer and small liver remnants. This report discusses the surgical management of a 51-year-old male who was diagnosed with stage IV rectal cancer with multiple heterogeneous hypoenhancing solid masses seen in both lobes of the liver consistent with metastatic disease. He completed six cycles of preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy with Avastin. Follow-up imaging demonstrated a good response. A combined low anterior resection and two-stage hepatectomy with ALPPS were discussed with the patient who agreed to proceed with the plan. He underwent a combined open low anterior resection with colorectal anastomosis in addition to the first stage of ALPPS. The patient tolerated the procedure well, and the immediate postoperative period was uncomplicated. Volumetric assessment of the left hepatic lobe on postoperative day seven demonstrated 26.7% of the original liver volume. The decision was made to take the patient back to the operating room on postoperative day nine for completion of the ALPPS, which entailed a total right hepatectomy. He tolerated the procedure well and was discharged home on postoperative day 16. No complications from the surgical procedure were reported on subsequent follow-up visits.

Robotic liver partition and portal vein embolization for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is one of the most complex challenges for hepatobiliary surgeons. Poor results and high incidence of morbidity after Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for pCCA discouraged this indication. It has been proposed that minimally invasive approach for ALPPS first stage, as well as combination of surgical liver partition and radiologic portal vein embolization (PVE), may improve outcomes reducing interstage morbidity. We report a case of right trisectionectomy with enbloc caudatectomy ALPPS scheduled for pCCA with robotic approach at stage-1, the full video is provided as supplementary material. Due to intraoperative presence of portal vein tumor infiltration during hilar dissection (no evidence in the pre-operative work-up), a radiologic right PVE was performed after stage-1 instead of portal vein ligation, followed by portal vein resection and biductal hepatico-jejunostomy at stage-2 with open approach. The patient was a 74-year-old female diagnosed with 3-cm mass-forming pCCA. The total clean liver volume was 1231 cc, with future liver remnant (FLR) volume of 25.1% (segments II and III). She was discharged in the interstage interval on postoperative day (POD) 4; CT scan on POD 12 showed that FLR increased up to 33% (369 cc) (Fig. 1). ALPPS was completed on POD 17, the postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged in good general condition on POD 19 after stage-2. Besides the already demonstrated advantages in terms of reduced interstage morbidity, robotic ALPPS represents a promising strategy to expand surgical indication in patients with pCCA. The combination of liver partition and PVE may increase the opportunities to perform radical resections in selected patients with pCCA and portal vein infiltration.

Oncological benefits of portal vein embolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Portal vein embolization (PVE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was first introduced in 1986 and has been continuously developed throughout the years. Basically, PVE has been applied to expand the indication of liver resection for HCC patients of insufficient future liver remnant. Importantly, PVE can result in tumor progression in both embolized and non-embolized livers; however, long-term survival after liver resection following PVE is at least not inferior compared with liver resection alone despite the smaller future liver remnant volume. Five-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival were 17% to 49% and 12% to 53% in non-PVE patients, and 21% to 78% and 44% to 72% in PVE patients, respectively. At present, it has proven that PVE has multiple oncological advantages for both surgical and nonsurgical treatments. PVE can also enhance the anticancer effects of transarterial chemoembolization and can avoid intraportal tumor cell dissemination. Additional interventional transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic vein embolization as well as surgical two-stage hepatectomy and associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy can enhance the oncological benefit of PVE monotherapy. Taken together, PVE is an important treatment which we recommend for listing in the guidelines for HCC treatment strategies.

Parenchyma-sparing vessel-guided major hepatectomy: nonsense or new paradigm in liver surgery?

Advanced liver surgery.

Total robotic ALPPS approach for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common indication for associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Robotic liver resection has been done for HCC, but robotic ALPPS is a rare procedure.

METHODS

To present three cases of totally robotic ALPPS in cirrhotic patients with HCC.

RESULTS

Three cirrhotic male patients with HCC underwent ALPPS; the mean age was 54.3 years. MELD score was ≤9 and tumour size between 90 and 140 mm. The mean hypertrophy of the future liver remnant after the first stage was 77.5% and no postoperative liver failure was reported. Mean operative time of stage 1 was 7:30 h and of stage 2 was 4:37 h, without blood transfusion. The mean hospital stay for the first stage was 10 days and for the second stage was 9.3 days. No postoperative complication was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic ALPPS in cirrhotic patients with HCC is safe and feasible.

The SMART-ALPPS Protocol: Strategy to Minimize ALPPS Risks by Targeting Invasiveness

BACKGROUND

The range of procedures with documented feasibility by laparoscopic approach is widening in the setting of liver resections. Many technical limits have been overcome in the attempt to reduce the biological impact of major procedures [1-8]. Similarly, associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)-which could be assumed as the paradigm of maxi-invasiveness-has recently been proposed in a minimally invasive fashion to reduce the impact of this procedure [9-12]. Technical insights to perform laparoscopic ALPPS are provided.

METHODS

Perioperative and intraoperative tips for laparoscopic ALPPS are provided within a SMART (Strategy to Minimize ALPPS Risks by Targeting invasiveness) protocol. Stage 1: After volumetric and functional assessment, partial liver transection is performed, keeping intact both the hilum and the caval plane (to prevent adhesions), therefore avoiding portal ligation. No inert material is left inside the abdominal cavity at the end of procedure to keep the liver surfaces apart. Radiologic portography with portal vein embolization is scheduled on postoperative day (POD) 1. Liver volume (pre-PVE: 29%; post-PVE: 52%) and liver function measured through a Technetium-99 hepatobiliary scintigraphy [13] (pre-PVE: 2.15%/min/sqm; post-PVE: 3.67%/min/sqm) of the future remnant liver are reassessed within 10 days to verify whether size and function are adequate. Stage 2: After 2 weeks from the first stage, laparoscopic right hepatectomy is performed following an anterior approach.

RESULTS

No conversion to open was required. Operative time was 100 and 300 minutes for stage 1 and 2, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss was 50 and 300 ml for the two procedures. Postoperative course was uneventful; patient was discharged on POD 6 of the second operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a perioperative protocol to prevent the risk of liver failure by both assessing volume and function of FLR and targeting the invasiveness of the surgical procedure may allow to minimize and control risks of a maximally invasive procedure, such as ALPPS.

[Evidence of minimally invasive oncological surgery of the liver]

BACKGROUND

The evidence for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the liver has significantly increased with the increasing number of publications on this topic in recent years; however, this technique has not yet gained broad acceptance among surgeons.

OBJECTIVE

Analysis and presentation of the current literature on MIS of the liver.

MATERIAL UND METHODS

Structured PubMed literature search and analysis.

RESULTS

According to the literature, MIS and open liver surgery are equivalent regarding the oncological quality. In addition to parenchyma-preserving resections, major hepatectomies (e.g. hemihepatectomy and sectorectomy), two-stage concepts and re-resections have increasingly been reported. The MIS of the liver is associated with less blood loss and other immunological advantages in addition to a shorter hospital stay. The highest level of evidence has been achieved for colorectal liver metastases for which a systematic review even revealed a survival benefit for patients undergoing MIS surgery. From an oncological perspective, laparoscopic and robotic liver surgery are considered to be equivalent.

CONCLUSION

According to the current literature MIS of the liver is recommended for the resection of colorectal liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives

The liver is the commonest site of metastatic disease for patients with colorectal cancer, with at least 25% developing colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of their illness. The management of CRLM has evolved into a complex field requiring input from experienced members of a multi-disciplinary team involving radiology (cross sectional, nuclear medicine and interventional), Oncology, Liver surgery, Colorectal surgery, and Histopathology. Patient management is based on assessment of sophisticated clinical, radiological and biomarker information. Despite incomplete evidence in this very heterogeneous patient group, maximising resection of CRLM using all available techniques remains a key objective and provides the best chance of long-term survival and cure. To this end, liver resection is maximised by the use of downsizing chemotherapy, optimisation of liver remnant by portal vein embolization, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and combining resection with ablation, in the context of improvements in the functional assessment of the future remnant liver. Liver resection may safely be carried out laparoscopically or open, and synchronously with, or before, colorectal surgery in selected patients. For unresectable patients, treatment options including systemic chemotherapy, targeted biological agents, intra-arterial infusion or bead delivered chemotherapy, tumour ablation, stereotactic radiotherapy, and selective internal radiotherapy contribute to improve survival and may convert initially unresectable patients to operability. Currently evolving areas include biomarker characterisation of tumours, the development of novel systemic agents targeting specific oncogenic pathways, and the potential re-emergence of radical surgical options such as liver transplantation.

Minimally Invasive Stage 1 to Protect Against the Risk of Liver Failure: Results from the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Series of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Italian Registry

Introduction: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been described to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but burdened, in its pioneering phase, by high morbidity and mortality. With the advent of minimally invasive (MI) techniques in liver surgery, surgical complications, including posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), have been dramatically reduced. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of MI- versus open-ALPPS for HCC, with specific focus on PHLF. Methods: Data of patients submitted to ALPPS for HCC between 2012 and 2020 were identified from the ALPPS Italian Registry. Patients receiving an MI Stage 1 (MI-ALPPS) constituted the study group, whereas the patients who received an open Stage 1 (open-ALPPS) constituted the control group. Results: Sixty-six patients were enrolled from 12 Italian centers. Stage 1 of ALPPS was performed in 14 patients using an MI approach (21.2%). MI-ALPPS patients were discharged after Stage 1 at a significantly higher rate compared with open-ALPPS (78.6% versus 9.6%, P < .001). After Stage 2, major morbidity after MI-ALPPS was 8.3% compared with 28.6% reported after open-ALPPS. Mortality was nil after MI-ALPPS. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in MI-ALPPS (12 days versus 22 days, P < .001). Univariate logistic regression analysis (Firth method) found that both MI-ALPPS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.05, P = .040) and partial parenchymal transection (OR = 0.04, P = .027) were protective against PHLF. Conclusion: This national multicenter study showed that a less invasive approach to ALPPS first stage was associated with a lower overall risk of PHLF.

Fully Robotic ALPPS and Simultaneous Left Colectomy for Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a recent surgical advancement for increasing the rate of successful liver resection. This technique is particularly important for patients with advanced tumor burden in whom future liver remnant volume is estimated to be too small to meet hepatic metabolic demands. With increasing acceptance of laparoscopic liver surgery and the related experience, even complex liver resection techniques such as ALPPS have been performed laparoscopically to improve patient outcomes. However, conventional laparoscopy has certain technical limitations that can result in a lack of dexterity. By overcoming these limitations, robot-assisted laparoscopy could become the preferred procedure for complex liver resection. In this study, we describe the technique of fully robotic ALPPS with simultaneous left colectomy in a patient with stage IV colorectal cancer. We emphasize on the performance of the robotic platform during certain difficult steps of the procedure.

First Case of Full Robotic ALPPS for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) demonstrated good long-term outcomes1 and can increase the rate of resectability in locally advanced ICC;2 however, the rates of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III) and mortality range between 13.6 and 44% and 0 and 29%, respectively.3 Minimally invasive strategies may reduce the risk of postoperative morbidity, with the same oncologic outcomes.4,5 We report the first case of full robotic ALPPS for advanced ICC.

METHODS

The patient was a 61-year-old male diagnosed with a 6.5 cm ICC involving segments IV, V, and VIII. The total clean liver volume was 1553 cc³, with a future liver remnant (FLR) volume of 21.6% (segments I, II, and III: 337 cc³). The procedure was performed by a senior hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeon at the robotic console and a junior HPB surgeon at the table side.

RESULTS

Computed tomography scan on postoperative day (POD) 9 after stage 1 showed that FLR increased up to 38%. The indocyanine green clearance test showed a plasma disappearance rate of 19.8%/min and a retention rate at 15 min of 5.1%; complete blood tests are available at the end of the video. ALPPS was completed on POD 14, the postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged in good general condition on POD 5. Final pathology showed a 6 cm ICC, G3, R0 margin (10 mm), T2-N0-M0. The patient started adjuvant capecitabine, and after 6 months was in good general condition without signs of local or systemic recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic ALPPS combines the opportunity to perform a curative resection in patients presenting with insufficient FLR with the advantages of a minimally invasive approach. It is feasible and oncologically accurate for ICC when performed in fully trained HPB centers.

Current status of laparoscopic liver resection for the management of colorectal liver metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide. The commonest site of spread is the liver, with up to 40% of patients developing colorectal liver metastasis (CLRM) during the course of their lifetime. Significant advances in surgical techniques, as well as breakthroughs in chemotherapy and biologic agents, have resulted in dramatic improvements in prognosis. A multimodal approach comprising of liver resection coupled with systemic therapy offers these patients the best chance of cure. The arrival of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) within the last 3 decades has added a whole new dimension to the management of this condition. Today, CLRM is one of the most frequent indications for LLR globally. Meta-analyses of retrospective studies and two randomized trials have demonstrated superior short-term outcomes following LLR, with no differences in mortality rates. Oncologically, R0 resection rates are comparable to the open approach, while overall and disease-free survival rates are also similar. As surgeons gain confidence, boundaries are pushed even further. High-volume centers have published their early experiences with complex LLR of recurrent CLRM as well as totally laparoscopic synchronous resection of CRC and liver metastases, with very encouraging results. In the presence of extensive bilobar CLRM, two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) and associating liver partition with portal vein ligation (ALPPS) may be adopted to augment an inadequate future liver remnant to facilitate metastasectomy. Interestingly, the adoption of LLR for these techniques also seem to confer additional benefits. Despite the plethora of advantages, LLR comes with its own unique set of limitations such as a steep learning curve and high cost. The surgical world eagerly awaits the results of prospective trials currently underway in order to further advance the management of this disease.

Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure for colorectal liver metastasis

Since first described, Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) has garnered boisterous praise and fervent criticism. Its rapid adoption and employment for a variety of indications resulted in high perioperative morbidity and mortality. However recent risk stratification, refinement of technique to reduce the impact of stage I and progression along the learning curve have resulted in improved outcomes. The first randomized trial comparing ALPPS to two stage hepatectomy (TSH) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) was recently published demonstrating comparable perioperative morbidity and mortality with improved resectability and survival following ALPPS. In this review, as ALPPS enters the thirteenth year since conception, the current status of this contentious two stage technique is presented and best practices for deployment in the treatment of CRLM is codified.