1
|
Lof S, Claassen L, Hannink G, Al-Sarireh B, Björnsson B, Boggi U, Burdio F, Butturini G, Capretti G, Casadei R, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Esposito A, Fabre JM, Ferrari G, Fretland AA, Ftériche FS, Fusai GK, Giardino A, Groot Koerkamp B, D’Hondt M, Jah A, Kamarajah SK, Kauffmann EF, Keck T, van Laarhoven S, Manzoni A, Marino MV, Marudanayagam R, Molenaar IQ, Pessaux P, Rosso E, Salvia R, Soonawalla Z, Souche R, White S, van Workum F, Zerbi A, Rosman C, Stommel MWJ, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. Learning Curves of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy in Experienced Pancreatic Centers. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:927-933. [PMID: 37378968 PMCID: PMC10308297 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Importance Understanding the learning curve of a new complex surgical technique helps to reduce potential patient harm. Current series on the learning curve of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) are mostly small, single-center series, thus providing limited data. Objective To evaluate the length of pooled learning curves of MIDP in experienced centers. Design, Setting, and Participants This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included MIDP procedures performed from January 1, 2006, through June 30, 2019, in 26 European centers from 8 countries that each performed more than 15 distal pancreatectomies annually, with an overall experience exceeding 50 MIDP procedures. Consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic distal pancreatectomy for all indications were included. Data were analyzed between September 1, 2021, and May 1, 2022. Exposures The learning curve for MIDP was estimated by pooling data from all centers. Main Outcomes and Measures The learning curve was assessed for the primary textbook outcome (TBO), which is a composite measure that reflects optimal outcome, and for surgical mastery. Generalized additive models and a 2-piece linear model with a break point were used to estimate the learning curve length of MIDP. Case mix-expected probabilities were plotted and compared with observed outcomes to assess the association of changing case mix with outcomes. The learning curve also was assessed for the secondary outcomes of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to open rate, and postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C. Results From a total of 2610 MIDP procedures, the learning curve analysis was conducted on 2041 procedures (mean [SD] patient age, 58 [15.3] years; among 2040 with reported sex, 1249 were female [61.2%] and 791 male [38.8%]). The 2-piece model showed an increase and eventually a break point for TBO at 85 procedures (95% CI, 13-157 procedures), with a plateau TBO rate at 70%. The learning-associated loss of TBO rate was estimated at 3.3%. For conversion, a break point was estimated at 40 procedures (95% CI, 11-68 procedures); for operation time, at 56 procedures (95% CI, 35-77 procedures); and for intraoperative blood loss, at 71 procedures (95% CI, 28-114 procedures). For postoperative pancreatic fistula, no break point could be estimated. Conclusion and Relevance In experienced international centers, the learning curve length of MIDP for TBO was considerable with 85 procedures. These findings suggest that although learning curves for conversion, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss are completed earlier, extensive experience may be needed to master the learning curve of MIDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Lof
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza–Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Linda Claassen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bilal Al-Sarireh
- Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Giovanni Capretti
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas University and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Surgery, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center and Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Jean M. Fabre
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Éloi Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Department of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Asmund A. Fretland
- The Intervention Center and Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Fadhel S. Ftériche
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Giuseppe K. Fusai
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Transplantation, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sivesh K. Kamarajah
- Department of Surgery, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stijn van Laarhoven
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Transplantation, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alberto Manzoni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza–Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco V. Marino
- Department of Emergency and General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Izaak Q. Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Viscerale and Digestive Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil–IHU-Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Zahir Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Regis Souche
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Éloi Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Steven White
- Department of Surgery, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas University and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza–Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pande R, Attard JA, Al-Sarireh B, Bhogal RH, Farrugia A, Fusai G, Harper S, Hidalgo-Salinas C, Jah A, Marangoni G, Mortimer M, Pizanias M, Prachialias A, Roberts KJ, Hee CS, Soggiu F, Srinivasan P, Chatzizacharias NA. Oncological outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in octogenarians: case-control study. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad053. [PMID: 37432365 PMCID: PMC10335165 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND By the end of this decade, 70 per cent of all diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas will be in the elderly. Surgical resection is the only curative option. In the elderly perioperative mortality is higher, while controversy still exists as to whether aggressive treatment offers any survival benefit. This study aimed to assess the oncological benefit of pancreatoduodenectomy in octogenarians with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHOD Retrospective multicentre case-control study of octogenarians and younger controls who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2008 and 2017. The primary endpoint was overall survival and the secondary endpoint was disease-free survival. RESULTS Overall, 220 patients were included. Although the Charlson co-morbidity index was higher in octogenerians, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, ASA and pathological parameters were comparable. Adjuvant therapy was more frequently delivered in the younger group (n = 80, 73 per cent versus n = 58, 53 per cent, P = 0.006). There was no significant difference between octogenarians and controls in overall survival (20 versus 29 months, P = 0.095) or disease-free survival (19 versus 22 months, P = 0.742). On multivariable analysis, age was not an independent predictor of either oncological outcome measured. CONCLUSION Octogenarians with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head and uncinate process may benefit from comparable oncological outcomes to younger patients with surgical treatment. Due to the age- and disease-related frailty and co-morbidities, careful preoperative assessment and patient selection is of paramount importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupaly Pande
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joseph A Attard
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Alexia Farrugia
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Giuseppe Fusai
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Simon Harper
- HPB Unit, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Asif Jah
- HPB Unit, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gabriele Marangoni
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS trust, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | | | - Keith J Roberts
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chloe Sew Hee
- HPB Unit, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen JW, van Ramshorst TME, Lof S, Al-Sarireh B, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, Burdio F, Butturini G, Casadei R, Coratti A, D'Hondt M, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Esposito A, Fabre JM, Ferrari G, Ftériche FS, Fusai GK, Koerkamp BG, Hackert T, Jah A, Jang JY, Kauffmann EF, Keck T, Manzoni A, Marino MV, Molenaar Q, Rau EP, Pessaux P, Pietrabissa A, Soonawalla Z, Sutcliffe RP, Timmermann L, White S, Yip VS, Zerbi A, Hilal MA, Besselink MG. ASO Visual Abstract: Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer-An International Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3035-3037. [PMID: 36809605 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13161-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey W Chen
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tess M E van Ramshorst
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Sanne Lof
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bilal Al-Sarireh
- Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Bergthor Bjornsson
- Department of Surgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fernando Burdio
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Surgery, Sant'Orsola Malphigi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center, Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Jean M Fabre
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Éloi Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Fadhel S Ftériche
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Giuseppe K Fusai
- HPB & Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Free London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Alberto Manzoni
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco V Marino
- Department of Emergency and General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
| | - Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Andrea Pietrabissa
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Steven White
- Department of Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - Vincent S Yip
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Bartshealth NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas University and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balakrishnan A, Barmpounakis P, Demiris N, Jah A, Spiers HV, Talukder S, Martin JL, Gibbs P, Harper SJ, Huguet EL, Kosmoliaptsis V, Liau SS, Praseedom RK, Basu B, de Aretxabala X, Lendoire J, Maithel S, Branes A, Andersson B, Serrablo A, Adsay V. Surgical outcomes of gallbladder cancer: the OMEGA retrospective, multicentre, international cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 59:101951. [PMID: 37125405 PMCID: PMC10130604 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rare but aggressive. The extent of surgical intervention for different GBC stages is non-uniform, ranging from cholecystectomy alone to extended resections including major hepatectomy, resection of adjacent organs and routine extrahepatic bile duct resection (EBDR). Robust evidence here is lacking, however, and survival benefit poorly defined. This study assesses factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and morbidity and mortality following GBC surgery in high income countries (HIC) and low and middle income countries (LMIC). Methods The multicentre, retrospective Operative Management of Gallbladder Cancer (OMEGA) cohort study included all patients who underwent GBC resection across 133 centres between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2020. Regression analyses assessed factors associated with OS, RFS and morbidity. Findings On multivariable analysis of all 3676 patients, wedge resection and segment IVb/V resection failed to improve RFS (HR 1.04 [0.84-1.29], p = 0.711 and HR 1.18 [0.95-1.46], p = 0.13 respectively) or OS (HR 0.96 [0.79-1.17], p = 0.67 and HR 1.48 [1.16-1.88], p = 0.49 respectively), while major hepatectomy was associated with worse RFS (HR 1.33 [1.02-1.74], p = 0.037) and OS (HR 1.26 [1.03-1.53], p = 0.022). Furthermore, EBDR (OR 2.86 [2.3-3.52], p < 0.0010), resection of additional organs (OR 2.22 [1.62-3.02], p < 0.0010) and major hepatectomy (OR 3.81 [2.55-5.73], p < 0.0010) were all associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Compared to LMIC, patients in HIC were associated with poorer RFS (HR 1.18 [1.02-1.37], p = 0.031) but not OS (HR 1.05 [0.91-1.22], p = 0.48). Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments were infrequently used. Interpretation In this large, multicentre analysis of GBC surgical outcomes, liver resection was not conclusively associated with improved survival, and extended resections were associated with greater morbidity and mortality without oncological benefit. Aggressive upfront resections do not benefit higher stage GBC, and international collaborations are needed to develop evidence-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies to minimise surgical morbidity and prioritise prognostic benefit. Funding Cambridge Hepatopancreatobiliary Department Research Fund.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- Corresponding author. Consultant Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgeon and Affiliated Assistant Professor, Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Petros Barmpounakis
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit – Cancer Theme, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Demiris
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit – Cancer Theme, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Harry V.M. Spiers
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Shibojit Talukder
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Jack L. Martin
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Gibbs
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J.F. Harper
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuel L. Huguet
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Siong S. Liau
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Raaj K. Praseedom
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Bristi Basu
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Xavier de Aretxabala
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
| | - Javier Lendoire
- Department of Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Hospital Dr Cosme Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Shishir Maithel
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Alejandro Branes
- Department of HPB Surgery, Hospital Sotero del Rio, Av. Concha y Toro 3459, Puente Alto, Región Metropolitana, Chile
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of HPB Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul 34010, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen JW, van Ramshorst TME, Lof S, Al-Sarireh B, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, Burdio F, Butturini G, Casadei R, Coratti A, D'Hondt M, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Esposito A, Fabre JM, Ferrari G, Ftériche FS, Fusai GK, Groot Koerkamp B, Hackert T, Jah A, Jang JY, Kauffmann EF, Keck T, Manzoni A, Marino MV, Molenaar Q, Pando E, Pessaux P, Pietrabissa A, Soonawalla Z, Sutcliffe RP, Timmermann L, White S, Yip VS, Zerbi A, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: An International, Retrospective, Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3023-3032. [PMID: 36800127 PMCID: PMC10085922 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13054-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is increasingly used as an alternative to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer but comparative multicenter studies confirming the safety and efficacy of RDP are lacking. METHODS An international, multicenter, retrospective, cohort study, including consecutive patients undergoing RDP and LDP for resectable pancreatic cancer in 33 experienced centers from 11 countries (2010-2019). The primary outcome was R0-resection. Secondary outcomes included lymph node yield, major complications, conversion rate, and overall survival. RESULTS In total, 542 patients after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy were included: 103 RDP (19%) and 439 LDP (81%). The R0-resection rate was comparable (75.7% RDP vs. 69.3% LDP, p = 0.404). RDP was associated with longer operative time (290 vs. 240 min, p < 0.001), more vascular resections (7.6% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.030), lower conversion rate (4.9% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.001), more major complications (26.2% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.019), improved lymph node yield (18 vs. 16, p = 0.021), and longer hospital stay (10 vs. 8 days, p = 0.001). The 90-day mortality (1.9% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.268) and overall survival (median 28 vs. 31 months, p = 0.599) did not differ significantly between RDP and LDP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In selected patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, RDP and LDP provide a comparable R0-resection rate and overall survival in experienced centers. Although the lymph node yield and conversion rate appeared favorable after RDP, LDP was associated with shorter operating time, less major complications, and shorter hospital stay. The specific benefits associated with each approach should be confirmed by multicenter, randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey W Chen
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tess M E van Ramshorst
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sanne Lof
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bergthor Bjornsson
- Department of Surgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fernando Burdio
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Surgery, Sant'Orsola Malphigi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center, Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Jean M Fabre
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Éloi Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Fadhel S Ftériche
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Alberto Manzoni
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco V Marino
- Department of Emergency and General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
| | - Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elizabeth Pando
- Department of Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Andrea Pietrabissa
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Steven White
- Department of Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - Vincent S Yip
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Bartshealth NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas University and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Ramshorst TME, Giani A, Mazzola M, Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Esposito A, de Pastena M, Lof S, Edwin B, Sahakyan M, Boggi U, Kauffman EF, Fabre JM, Souche RF, Zerbi A, Butturini G, Molenaar Q, Al-Sarireh B, Marino MV, Keck T, White SA, Casadei R, Burdio F, Björnsson B, Soonawalla Z, Koerkamp BG, Fusai GK, Pessaux P, Jah A, Pietrabissa A, Hackert T, D'Hondt M, Pando E, Besselink MG, Ferrari G, Hilal MA. Benchmarking of robotic and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by using two different methods. Br J Surg 2022; 110:76-83. [PMID: 36322465 PMCID: PMC10364499 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benchmarking is an important tool for quality comparison and improvement. However, no benchmark values are available for minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, either laparoscopically or robotically assisted. The aim of this study was to establish benchmarks for these techniques using two different methods. METHODS Data from patients undergoing laparoscopically or robotically assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy were extracted from a multicentre database (2006-2019). Benchmarks for 10 outcomes were calculated using the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC) and best-patient-in-best-centre methods. RESULTS Overall, 951 laparoscopically assisted (77.3 per cent) and 279 robotically assisted (22.7 per cent) procedures were included. Using the ABC method, the benchmarks for laparoscopically assisted and robotically assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy respectively were: 150 and 207 min for duration of operation, 55 and 100 ml for blood loss, 3.5 and 1.7 per cent for conversion, 0 and 1.7 per cent for failure to preserve the spleen, 27.3 and 34.0 per cent for overall morbidity, 5.1 and 3.3 per cent for major morbidity, 3.6 and 7.1 per cent for pancreatic fistula grade B/C, 5 and 6 days for duration of hospital stay, 2.9 and 5.4 per cent for readmissions, and 0 and 0 per cent for 90-day mortality. Best-patient-in-best-centre methodology revealed milder benchmark cut-offs for laparoscopically and robotically assisted procedures, with operating times of 254 and 262.5 min, blood loss of 150 and 195 ml, conversion rates of 5.8 and 8.2 per cent, rates of failure to salvage spleen of 29.9 and 27.3 per cent, overall morbidity rates of 62.7 and 55.7 per cent, major morbidity rates of 20.4 and 14 per cent, POPF B/C rates of 23.8 and 24.2 per cent, duration of hospital stay of 8 and 8 days, readmission rates of 20 and 15.1 per cent, and 90-day mortality rates of 0 and 0 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION Two benchmark methods for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy produced different values, and should be interpreted and applied differently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess M E van Ramshorst
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.,Amsterdamum UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Giani
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Mazzola
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Fadhel Samir Ftériche
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo de Pastena
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Sanne Lof
- Amsterdamum UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Intervention Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, also Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy, and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marco V Marino
- General and Emergency Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy.,General Surgery Department, Istituto Villa Salus, Siracusa, Italy
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Surgery, Sant'Orsola Malphigi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fernando Burdio
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, theNetherlands
| | - Giuseppe Kito Fusai
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Free London, London, UK
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University Hospital, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrea Pietrabissa
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Elizabeth Pando
- Department of Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdamum UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pande R, Attard J, Al-Sarireh B, Bhogal R, Farrugia A, Fusai G, Harper S, Hidalgo-Salinas C, Jah A, Marangoni G, Mortimer M, Pizanias M, Prachialias A, Roberts K, Hee CS, Soggiu F, Srinivasan P, Chatzizacharias NA. HPB P03 Oncological outcomes are comparable between octogenarians and younger patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac404.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Oncological outcomes are comparable between octogenarians and younger patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Methods
A multicentre case-control study of octogenarians matched on complexity of surgery with consecutive younger controls who underwent PD for PDAC (2008–2017).
Results
Some 220 patients were included, 110 octogenarians (age 81 (80–83)) and 110 controls (age 69 (62–74)). Charlson Comorbidity Index score was higher in octogenarians than controls (7 (6–8) vs 5 (4–6)), p<0.0001) but Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (Groups 0–1: 99 vs 98; 2–3: 5 vs 4, p=0.756) and ASA (ASA 1–2: 72 vs 77; 3–4: 20 vs 18; p=0.635) were comparable. Adjuvant therapy was delivered more commonly in the younger cohort (76.2 vs 58.0%, p= 0.007). Tumour stage, lymph node ratio and resection margin status were comparable between groups. There was no difference between octogenarians and controls in OS (20 (14–26) vs 29, (24–24) months p=0.095) or DFS (19,(13–24) vs 22,(15–29) months p=0.742). On multivariate analysis, age was not a risk predictor.
Conclusions
In selected fit octogenarians, equivalent survival is achievable. Centralisation and multimodal therapy are key. Pre-operative risk stratification using at ECOG and albumin level can be used to identify an appropriate population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupaly Pande
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Attard
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | | | - Ricky Bhogal
- Royal Marsden Hospital , London , United Kingdom
| | - Alexia Farrugia
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS trust , Coventry , United Kingdom
| | | | - Simon Harper
- Cambridge University Hospital , Cambridge , United Kingdom
| | | | - Asif Jah
- Cambridge University Hospital , Cambridge , United Kingdom
| | - Gabriele Marangoni
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS trust , Coventry , United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Keith Roberts
- University Hospitals of Birmingham , Birmingham , United Kingdom
| | - Chloe Sew Hee
- Cambridge University Hospital , Cambridge , United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Balakrishnan A, Jah A, Lesurtel M, Andersson B, Gibbs P, Harper SJF, Huguet EL, Kosmoliaptsis V, Liau SS, Praseedom RK, Ramia JM, Branes A, Lendoire J, Maithel S, Serrablo A, Achalandabaso M, Adham M, Ahmet A, Al-Sarireh B, Albiol Quer M, Alconchel F, Alejandro R, Alsammani M, Alseidi A, Anand A, Anselmo A, Antonakis P, Arabadzhieva E, de Aretxabala X, Aroori S, Ashley S, Ausania F, Banerjee A, Barabino M, Bartlett A, Bartsch F, Belli A, Beristain-Hernandez J, Berrevoet F, Bhatti A, Bhojwani R, Bjornsson B, Blaz T, Byrne M, Calvo M, Castellanos J, Castro M, Cavallucci D, Chang D, Christodoulis G, Ciacio O, Clavien P, Coker A, Conde-Rodriguez M, D'Amico F, D'Hondt M, Daams F, Dasari B, De Beillis M, de Meijer V, Dede K, Deiro G, Delgado F, Desai G, Di Gioia A, Di Martino M, Dixon M, Dorovinis P, Dumitrascu T, Ebata T, Eilard M, Erdmann J, Erkan M, Famularo S, Felli E, Fergadi M, Fernandez G, Fox A, Galodha S, Galun D, Ganandha S, Garcia R, Gemenetzis G, Giannone F, Gil L, Giorgakis E, Giovinazzo F, Giuffrida M, Giuliani T, Giuliante F, Gkekas I, Goel M, Goh B, Gomes A, Gruenberger T, Guevara O, Gulla A, Gupta A, Gupta R, Hakeem A, Hamid H, Heinrich S, Helton S, Heumann A, Higuchi R, Hughes D, Inarejos B, Ivanecz A, Iwao Y, Iype S, Jaen I, Jie M, Jones R, Kacirek K, Kalayarasan R, Kaldarov A, Kaman L, Kanhere H, Kapoor V, Karanicolas P, Karayiannakis A, Kausar A, Khan Z, Kim DS, Klose J, Knowles B, Koh P, Kolodziejczyk P, Komorowski A, Koong J, Kozyrin I, Krishna A, Kron P, Kumar N, van Laarhoven S, Lakhey P, Lanari J, Laurenzi A, Leow V, Limbu Y, Liu YB, Lob S, Lolis E, Lopez-Lopez V, Lozano R, Lundgren L, Machairas M, Magouliotis D, Mahamid A, Malde D, Malek A, Malik H, Malleo G, Marino M, Mayo S, Mazzola M, Memeo R, Menon K, Menzulin R, Mohan R, Morgul H, Moris D, Mulita F, Muttillo E, Nahm C, Nandasena M, Nashidengo P, Nickkholgh A, Nikov A, Noel C, O'Reilly D, O'Rourke T, Ohtsuka M, Omoshoro-Jones J, Pandanaboyana S, Pararas N, Patel R, Patkar S, Peng J, Perfecto A, Perinel J, Perivoliotis K, Perra T, Phan M, Piccolo G, Porcu A, Primavesi F, Primrose J, Pueyo-Periz E, Radenkovic D, Rammohan A, Rowcroft A, Sakata J, Saladino E, Schena C, Scholer A, Schwarz C, Serrano P, Silva M, Soreide K, Sparrelid E, Stattner S, Sturesson C, Sugiura T, Sumo M, Sutcliffe R, Teh C, Teo J, Tepetes K, Thapa P, Thepbunchonchai A, Torres J, Torres O, Torzili G, Tovikkai C, Troncoso A, Tsoulfas G, Tuzuher A, Tzimas G, Umar G, Urbani L, Vanagas T, Varga, Velayutham V, Vigano L, Wakai T, Yang Z, Yip V, Zacharoulis D, Zakharov E, Zimmitti G. Heterogeneity of management practices surrounding operable gallbladder cancer - results of the OMEGA-S international HPB surgical survey. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:2006-2012. [PMID: 35922277 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive, uncommon malignancy, with variation in operative approaches adopted across centres and few large-scale studies to guide practice. We aimed to identify the extent of heterogeneity in GBC internationally to better inform the need for future multicentre studies. METHODS A 34-question online survey was disseminated to members of the European-African Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (EAHPBA), American Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (AHPBA) and Asia-Pacific Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (A-PHPBA) regarding practices around diagnostic workup, operative approach, utilization of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and surveillance strategies. RESULTS Two hundred and three surgeons responded from 51 countries. High liver resection volume units (>50 resections/year) organised HPB multidisciplinary team discussion of GBCs more commonly than those with low volumes (p < 0.0001). Management practices exhibited areas of heterogeneity, particularly around operative extent. Contrary to consensus guidelines, anatomical liver resections were favoured over non-anatomical resections for T3 tumours and above, lymphadenectomy extent was lower than recommended, and a minority of respondents still routinely excised the common bile duct or port sites. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest some similarities in the management of GBC internationally, but also specific areas of practice which differed from published guidelines. Transcontinental collaborative studies on GBC are necessary to establish evidence-based practice to minimise variation and optimise outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Mickael Lesurtel
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Paul Gibbs
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J F Harper
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuel L Huguet
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Siong S Liau
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Raaj K Praseedom
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Jose M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Avenida Pintor Baeza, 12 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | - Alejandro Branes
- Department of HPB Surgery, Hospital Sotero del Rio, Av. Concha y Toro 3459, Puente Alto, Región Metropolitana, Chile
| | - Javier Lendoire
- Department of Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Hospital Dr Cosme Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Shishir Maithel
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322 USA
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of HPB Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Giani A, van Ramshorst T, Mazzola M, Bassi C, Esposito A, de Pastena M, Edwin B, Sahakyan M, Kleive D, Jah A, van Laarhoven S, Boggi U, Kauffman EF, Casadei R, Ricci C, Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, White SA, Kamarajah SK, Butturini G, Frigerio I, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Pando E, Sutcliffe RP, Marudanayagam R, Fusai GK, Fabre JM, Björnsson B, Timmermann L, Soonawalla Z, Burdio F, Keck T, Hackert T, Groot Koerkamp B, d’Hondt M, Coratti A, Pessaux P, Pietrabissa A, Al-Sarireh B, Marino MV, Molenaar Q, Yip V, Besselink M, Ferrari G, Hilal MA. Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1124-1130. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Benchmarking is the process to used assess the best achievable results and compare outcomes with that standard. This study aimed to assess best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (MIDPS).
Methods
This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing MIDPS for any indication, between 2003 and 2019, in 31 European centres. Benchmarks of the main clinical outcomes were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) method. After identifying independent risk factors for severe morbidity and conversion, risk-adjusted ABCs were calculated for each subgroup of patients at risk.
Results
A total of 1595 patients were included. The ABC was 2.5 per cent for conversion and 8.4 per cent for severe morbidity. ABC values were 160 min for duration of operation time, 8.3 per cent for POPF, 1.8 per cent for reoperation, and 0 per cent for mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that conversion was associated with male sex (OR 1.48), BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.42), multivisceral resection (OR 3.04), and laparoscopy (OR 2.24). Increased risk of severe morbidity was associated with ASA fitness grade above II (OR 1.60), multivisceral resection (OR 1.88), and robotic approach (OR 1.87).
Conclusion
The benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represent optimal outcomes from best achievable care, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks should be used to set standards to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Giani
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda , Milan , Italy
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza , Brescia , Italy
| | - Tess van Ramshorst
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza , Brescia , Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Michele Mazzola
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda , Milan , Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital , Verona , Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital , Verona , Italy
| | - Matteo de Pastena
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital , Verona , Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Intervention Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo Norway
| | - Mushegh Sahakyan
- Intervention Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo Norway
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Intervention Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo Norway
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - Stijn van Laarhoven
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Surgery, Sant’Orsola Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Claudio Ricci
- Department of Surgery, Sant’Orsola Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital , Clichy , France
| | - Fadhel Samir Ftériche
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital , Clichy , France
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | | | | | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele , Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital , Rozzano , Italy
| | - Giovanni Capretti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele , Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital , Rozzano , Italy
| | - Elizabeth Pando
- Department of Surgery, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK
| | - Giuseppe Kito Fusai
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Free London , London , UK
| | | | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden
| | | | | | - Fernando Burdio
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein , Campus Lübeck, Lübeck , Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mathieu d’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital , Kortrijk , Belgium
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital , Florence , Italy
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University Hospital, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire de Strasbourg , Strasbourg , France
| | - Andrea Pietrabissa
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo , Pavia , Italy
| | | | - Marco V Marino
- General and Emergency Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello , Palermo , Italy
- General Surgery Department, Istituto Villa Salus , Siracusa , Italy
| | - Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht , the Netherlands
| | - Vincent Yip
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust , London , UK
| | - Marc Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda , Milan , Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza , Brescia , Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zelga P, Hernandez-Barco YG, Qadan M, Ferrone CR, Kambadakone A, Horick N, Jah A, Warshaw AL, Lillemoe KD, Balakrishnan A, Fernández-Del Castillo C. Number of Worrisome Features and Risk of Malignancy in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:1021-1030. [PMID: 35703792 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2017 revised International Association of Pancreatology guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) describe worrisome features (WF) and high-risk stigmata (HRS), recommending resection in the latter and further work-up and close surveillance for patients with WF. The effect of multiple WF on the likelihood of malignancy has not been evaluated. STUDY DESIGN Eight hundred ten patients who underwent pancreatic resection for IPMN in 2 tertiary referral centers were identified from prospective institutional databases. Patients were retrospectively categorized into subgroups according to the number of WF or HRS and presence of malignancy, defined as high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive cancer on final pathology. RESULTS Three hundred seventy-nine (47%) patients had HRS, 370 (46%) had 1 or more WF, and 61 patients (7%) had neither. Malignancy was present in 70% (n = 267) of patients with HRS and in 30% (n = 127) of those with WF. Only 3 of 61 patients without WF/HRS had malignancy, and all only in the form of HGD. The risk of malignancy increased in a stepwise fashion with the number of WF, to 22%, 34%, and 59% with 1, 2, and 3 WF, respectively (p = 0.001), and reached 100% in patients with 4 or more WF. Although the relative risks differed for particular WF, the areas under the curve were not statistically different. CONCLUSION We confirm that presence of HRS in IPMN is associated with a very high likelihood of malignancy. The presence of a single WF has a malignancy risk of 22%, and additional WF increase this risk significantly. When 3 or more WF are present, the risk is similar to that of HRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Zelga
- From the Department of Surgery (Zelga, Qadan, Ferrone, Warshaw, Lillemoe, Fernández-del Castillo), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Zelga, Jah, Balakrishnan)
| | - Yasmin G Hernandez-Barco
- Division of Gastroenterology (Hernandez-Barco), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Motaz Qadan
- From the Department of Surgery (Zelga, Qadan, Ferrone, Warshaw, Lillemoe, Fernández-del Castillo), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- From the Department of Surgery (Zelga, Qadan, Ferrone, Warshaw, Lillemoe, Fernández-del Castillo), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Avinash Kambadakone
- Department of Radiology (Kambadakone), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nora Horick
- Biostatistics Center, Division of Clinical Research (Horick), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Zelga, Jah, Balakrishnan)
| | - Andrew L Warshaw
- From the Department of Surgery (Zelga, Qadan, Ferrone, Warshaw, Lillemoe, Fernández-del Castillo), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- From the Department of Surgery (Zelga, Qadan, Ferrone, Warshaw, Lillemoe, Fernández-del Castillo), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Zelga, Jah, Balakrishnan)
| | - Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo
- From the Department of Surgery (Zelga, Qadan, Ferrone, Warshaw, Lillemoe, Fernández-del Castillo), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zelga P, Hernández-Barco YG, Qadan M, Ferrone CR, Baba T, Bolm L, Jah A, Warshaw AL, Lillemoe KD, Balakrishnan A, Fernández-Del Castillo C. ABO blood group distribution and risk of malignancy in patients undergoing resection for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). Pancreatology 2022; 22:264-269. [PMID: 35000863 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ABO blood type has been associated with risk of development of several malignancies, including pancreatic cancer. Data regarding IPMN is equivocal. To investigate this further, we analyzed the association between the ABO blood group and the presence of malignancy in a large cohort of resected IPMN and its influence in survival. METHODS 819 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for IPMN in the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) from January 1993 to December 2020 were identified from prospective institutional databases. Pathological characteristics and blood type were correlated. RESULTS The distribution of blood types A, B, AB and O was 384 (47%), 92 (11%), 44 (5%) and 299 (37%), respectively. This blood type distribution was different than the reference population of the MGH and the CUH, which is 55% non-O blood group, and 45% type O. There was a significant predominance of non-O blood types when compared with O-blood type in patients with malignant IPMN (i.e. patients with high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer) (67% vs 33%, OR 1.31 95%CI: 0.98-1.75, p = 0.069). The association was stronger for IPMN with invasive cancer (OR 1.43 95%CI: 1.01-2.02, p = 0.039). Blood group did not influence survival. CONCLUSION Non-O blood type is associated with need for resection in IPMN and with presence of invasive carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Zelga
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Yasmin G Hernández-Barco
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Taisuke Baba
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Louisa Bolm
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew L Warshaw
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dewi F, Scroggie D, Pathak S, Blencowe N, Hollowood A, Strong S, Jah A, Smith A, Van Laarhoven S. P-O05 Deconstructing Operations to Improve Recording of Surgical Training Experience. Br J Surg 2021. [PMCID: PMC9383123 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab430.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
A new outcomes-based curriculum is soon to be implemented for UK surgical trainees. Performance will be evaluated against the standard expected of a new consultant. Accurate recording of operative experience and performance will therefore be crucial to demonstrate achievement of this standard. The current eLogbook system for recording surgical experience has many benefits including simplicity and accessibility, but may misrepresent actual experience because most operations are considered as a whole; unlike some colorectal operations, involvement in steps within many upper gastrointestinal (UGI) operations cannot be recorded.
Methods
Impact on training by the COVID-19 pandemic led to discussion and identification of cultural and logistical barriers to accurate recording of experience. To address these, a modification to enhance the current eLogbook system was developed by trainees and trainers at a university teaching hospital. An existing typology was used to deconstruct common UGI operations into their component steps, which can be recorded at this more detailed level.
Results
The modified deconstructed logbook concept is described using a worked example, which can be applied to any operation. We also describe the integration of a component-based training discussion into the surgical team brief and debrief; this complements the deconstructed logbook by promoting a training culture.
Conclusions
Using the described techniques, trainees of all levels can comprehensively and accurately describe their surgical experience. Senior trainees will benefit from recording complex operations which they are not expected to complete in their entirety, whilst less experienced trainees will benefit from the ability to record their involvement in more basic parts of operations. The suggested approach will reduce misrepresentation of experience, encourage proactive planning of training opportunities, and reduce the impact of crises such as pandemics on surgical training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ffion Dewi
- South West Surgical Deanery, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Darren Scroggie
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Samir Pathak
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol, United Kingdom
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Blencowe
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol, United Kingdom
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Hollowood
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Strong
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Asif Jah
- University Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Smith
- Department of Surgery, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Stijn Van Laarhoven
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Attard JA, Al-Sarireh B, Bhogal RH, Farrugia A, Fusai G, Harper S, Hidalgo-Salinas C, Jah A, Marangoni G, Mortimer M, Pizanias M, Prachialias A, Roberts KJ, Sew Hee C, Soggiu F, Srinivasan P, Chatzizacharias NA. Short-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy in octogenarians: multicentre case-control study. Br J Surg 2021; 109:89-95. [PMID: 34750618 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is frequently the surgical treatment indicated for a number of pathologies. Elderly patients may be denied surgery because of concerns over poor perioperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative clinical outcomes and provide evidence on current UK practice in the elderly population after PD. METHODS This was a multicentre retrospective case-control study of octogenarians undergoing PD between January 2008 and December 2017, matched with younger controls from seven specialist centres in the UK. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were index admission mortality, postoperative complications, and 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS In total, 235 octogenarians (median age 81 (range 80-90) years) and 235 controls (age 67 (31-79) years) were included in the study. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (median 0 (range 0-3) versus 0 (0-2); P = 0.010) and Charlson Co-morbidity Index score (7 (6-11) versus 5 (2-9); P = 0.001) were higher for octogenarians than controls. Postoperative complication and 30-day readmission rates were comparable. The 90-day mortality rate was higher among octogenarians (9 versus 3 per cent; P = 0.030). Index admission mortality rates were comparable (4 versus 2 per cent; P = 0.160), indicating that the difference in mortality was related to deaths after hospital discharge. Despite the higher 90-day mortality rate in the octogenarian population, multivariable Cox regression analysis did not identify age as an independent predictor of postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION Despite careful patient selection and comparable index admission mortality, 90-day and, particularly, out-of-hospital mortality rates were higher in octogenarians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A Attard
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Alexia Farrugia
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Giuseppe Fusai
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Simon Harper
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Asif Jah
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gabriele Marangoni
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Michail Pizanias
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Keith J Roberts
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chloe Sew Hee
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiammetta Soggiu
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Thiyagarajan UM, Al-Mohammad A, Goh S, Liau SS, Huguet E, Jah A. EP.TH.1043Outcomes of liver resections by trainee surgeons versus consultant surgeon – a single centre experience. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab309.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Liver resection is a most effective treatment for patients with operable primary or secondary cancer deposits. The role of trainee as a lead surgeon versus consultant surgeon performing liver resections and its impact on surgical outcomes had never been reported.
Methods and Materials
This study was aimed to assess the liver resection outcomes including operative time, acute kidney injury (AKI), bile leak, sepsis, mortality and hospital readmission within 3 months. A total of 320 liver resections from Addenbookes Hospital at Cambridge between 2015 to 2017 were included in this study.
All liver resections were performed under supervision of the consultant surgeon who is either scrubbed or unscrubbed in theatre. Trainee surgeons have performed 116 of 320 as lead surgeon and the consultant surgeons performed the remaining 204.
Results
The mean operative time was 413±129 versus 383±118 (P = 0.41) minutes in trainee surgeons and consultant surgeons respectively. The incidence of postoperative AKI were similar in between the groups (5/116 versus 11/204;P=0.79). Although the bile leak was numerically high in the trainee group, did not reach statistical difference (13/116 versus 12/204;P=0.12); similar results noted in the incidence of sepsis too (3/116 versus 4/204;P=070). Mortality, hospital readmission at 3 months were (1/204 versus 1/116;P=1) and (2/116 versus 4/204;P=1) respectively. No significant difference was observed.
Conclusion
Liver resections performed by the trainee surgeons under supervision appeared to be safe without increasing the operative time, morbidity, mortality and hospital readmission at 90 days. Further multicentre prospective study with long-term follow up is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Asif Jah
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spiers HVM, Thankamma A, Davies S, Duckworth A, Jah A, Liau SS. EP.TH.603Hypofractionated radiotherapy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a world first in response to COVID19. Br J Surg 2021. [PMCID: PMC8574339 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab309.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction COVID-19 has challenged healthcare systems across the world, restricting resources for major hepato-pancreato-biliary resections. We report the experience of a unique temporising measure to overcome unavailability of upfront surgery, for select patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) during the pandemic. Methods Select patients with rPDAC who were assessed to be unsuitable for, or declined, upfront systemic chemotherapy, were considered for hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypoRT) as bridging therapy to Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Results Three patients with EUS-biopsy confirmed rPDAC with no vascular involvement received 5 fractions of hypoRT followed by Whipple’s resection. Median patient age was 68 (range 63-77). All patients successfully completed hypoRT, with one case of transient grade 2 anorexia. Median interval from hypoRT to resection was 75 days (range 41-95 days), with median operative time including anaesthesia of 573 minutes (range 496-661 minutes). R0 resection was achieved in two cases, including one requiring portal vein resection. R1 resection was seen in one patient who required superior mesenteric vein resection. One patient experienced complication in the form of delayed gastric emptying. Median length of stay was 11 days (range 11-58 days). No patient experienced post-operative pancreatic fistula, and no patient has evidence of recurrence on 30-day follow up imaging. Conclusion This report provides initial experience for hypoRT in select patients with rPDAC prior to resection. Further work is required to quantify outcomes and long-term safety profile of this novel approach. The hypoRT programme allowed select patients to obtain treatment whilst awaiting availability of surgical resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susan Davies
- Cambridge Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Unit
| | | | - Asif Jah
- Cambridge Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Unit
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zelga P, Rees J, Iaculli E, Johnson C, Jah A. Patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy to treat acute pancreatitis: An exploratory study. J Dig Dis 2021; 22:604-614. [PMID: 34331420 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study (abbreviated as QUANTUM) was to assess the quality of life (QoL) of patients who underwent minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy (MIRPN) for acute pancreatic necrosis with or without infection of necrotic tissue collections after discharge and to compare the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in these patients with published data in normative population. METHODS Patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent MIRPN between January 2010 and December 2016 were identified and invited to complete the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and EORTC PAN28(CP) questionnaires. PRO were compared using Pearson correlation coefficient and ANOVA (significance P < 0.01) with an age- and sex-matched normative population of western Europe, stratified by age, and also the time duration after MIRPN (<3 y and >3 y). A change >15 points in the PRO score was taken as clinically important. RESULTS Among 52 eligible patients identified, 46 (88%) agreed to participate, 74% returned questionnaires. After the MIRPN all patients had worse physical and social functioning scores with a clinically important (>15 points) reduction in those ≤50 years; while fatigue, pain and insomnia symptom scales had the highest scores (42, 26 and 30 points, respectively). Patients <3 years after MIRPN had similar scores for all functional scales and global health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to the normative population. However, over time their global HRQoL deteriorated and after 3 years their scores for functioning and symptoms were statistically (P < 0.0001) and clinically (>15 points) worse than those in age-matched controls. CONCLUSIONS During the first 3 years after the MIRPN patients have a relatively high QoL but report worse fatigue than the normative population. However, patients should be informed that their HRQoL deteriorates with time, often due to chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic insufficiency. This study supports the use of MIRPN and prospective studies of HRQoL in this setting are indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Zelga
- Cambridge Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Rees
- Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Edoardo Iaculli
- Cambridge Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Colin Johnson
- Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Asif Jah
- Cambridge Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Morton J, Hardwick RH, Tilney HS, Gudgeon AM, Jah A, Stevens L, Marecik S, Slack M. Preclinical evaluation of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access general and colorectal procedures. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:2169-2177. [PMID: 32405893 PMCID: PMC8057987 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07622-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the utility of a new robot-assisted surgical system (the Versius Surgical System, CMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK) for use in minimal access general and colorectal surgery, in a preclinical setting. Robot-assisted laparoscopy has been developed to overcome some of the important limitations of conventional laparoscopy. The new system is designed to assist surgeons in performing minimal access surgery and overcome some of the challenges associated with currently available surgical robots. METHODS Cadaveric sessions were conducted to evaluate the ability of the system to provide adequate surgical access and reach required to complete a range of general and colorectal procedures. Port and bedside unit positions were recorded, and surgical access and reach were evaluated by the lead surgeon using a visual analogue scale. A live animal (porcine) model was used to assess the surgical device's safety in performing cholecystectomy or small bowel enterotomy. RESULTS Nine types of procedure were performed in cadavers by nine lead surgeons; 35/38 procedures were completed successfully. The positioning of ports and bedside units reflected the lead surgeons' preferred laparoscopic set-up and enabled good surgical access and reach. Cholecystectomy (n = 6) and small bowel enterotomy (n = 5) procedures performed in pigs were all completed successfully by two surgeons. There were no device-related intra-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS This preclinical study of a new robot-assisted surgical system for minimal access general and colorectal surgery demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the system in cadaver and porcine models. Further studies are required to assess its clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Morton
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard H Hardwick
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Henry S Tilney
- Department of Surgery, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley Park Hospital, Surrey, UK
| | - A Mark Gudgeon
- Department of Surgery, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley Park Hospital, Surrey, UK
| | - Asif Jah
- Cambridge Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lewis Stevens
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Slawomir Marecik
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital and University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mark Slack
- CMR Surgical Ltd, 1 Evolution Business Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB24 9NG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Martin J, Petrillo A, Smyth EC, Shaida N, Khwaja S, Cheow HK, Duckworth A, Heister P, Praseedom R, Jah A, Balakrishnan A, Harper S, Liau S, Kosmoliaptsis V, Huguet E. Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:761-808. [PMID: 33200074 PMCID: PMC7643190 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i10.761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The liver is the commonest site of metastatic disease for patients with colorectal cancer, with at least 25% developing colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of their illness. The management of CRLM has evolved into a complex field requiring input from experienced members of a multi-disciplinary team involving radiology (cross sectional, nuclear medicine and interventional), Oncology, Liver surgery, Colorectal surgery, and Histopathology. Patient management is based on assessment of sophisticated clinical, radiological and biomarker information. Despite incomplete evidence in this very heterogeneous patient group, maximising resection of CRLM using all available techniques remains a key objective and provides the best chance of long-term survival and cure. To this end, liver resection is maximised by the use of downsizing chemotherapy, optimisation of liver remnant by portal vein embolization, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and combining resection with ablation, in the context of improvements in the functional assessment of the future remnant liver. Liver resection may safely be carried out laparoscopically or open, and synchronously with, or before, colorectal surgery in selected patients. For unresectable patients, treatment options including systemic chemotherapy, targeted biological agents, intra-arterial infusion or bead delivered chemotherapy, tumour ablation, stereotactic radiotherapy, and selective internal radiotherapy contribute to improve survival and may convert initially unresectable patients to operability. Currently evolving areas include biomarker characterisation of tumours, the development of novel systemic agents targeting specific oncogenic pathways, and the potential re-emergence of radical surgical options such as liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Martin
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Department of Precision Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli 80131, Italy, & Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli Italy
| | - Elizabeth C Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Nadeem Shaida
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB22 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Samir Khwaja
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB22 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - HK Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Duckworth
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Paula Heister
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Raaj Praseedom
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Harper
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Siong Liau
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuel Huguet
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Feretis M, Wang T, Ghorani E, Balakrishnan A, Harper SJ, Jah A, Huguet EL, Praseedom RK, Liau SS. A rational approach to postoperative surveillance for resected non-functional pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumours. Pancreatology 2019; 19:1000-1007. [PMID: 31445889 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-PNETs) are rare and have highly variable outcomes. Current guidelines recommend surveillance for NF-PNETs <2 cm. Patients who ultimately have surgical resection are at risk of disease recurrence, and data to support postoperative surveillance protocols are lacking. The aims of this study were to i) identify post-operative predictors of recurrence and ii) risk stratify patients at risk of recurrence. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent surgery for NF-PNETs between 2002 and 2015 were identified retrospectively. Data were collected on demographics, pre-operative laboratory results and histopathological tumour characteristics. Statistical analyses were based on penalised Cox-regression modelling and a decision-tree model. Comparison of the variables identified was performed using ROC curves to identify the most sensitive and specific variable associated with disease recurrence. RESULTS We identified 73 patients (38 males) with a median age of 61.5 years (range: 31-79). The median period of follow-up was 49 months (5-131). During follow up, 10 deaths (13.9%) were recorded and disease recurrence occurred in 12 patients (16.4%). The Kaplan-Meier predicted 1-,3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 98.6% (95% CI = 95.9, 100%), 85.4% (76.9-94.8%) and 72% (58.7-88.2%) respectively. Cox multivariate analysis identified poor tumour differentiation (WHO G3 grade) and lymph node ratio (LNR) as independent predictors for recurrence (p < 0.05). A simple criterion of 'tumour grade G3 or LNR ≥0.1' was found to be sensitive and specific in detecting disease recurrence. CONCLUSION Our results have identified a simple and sensitive criterion for risk stratifying post-resection surveillance. Prospective validation in larger patient cohort is now warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Feretis
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - T Wang
- Department of Statistics, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - E Ghorani
- Department of Oncology, University College London, UK
| | - A Balakrishnan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - S J Harper
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Jah
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - E L Huguet
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - R K Praseedom
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - S-S Liau
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Makris GC, See T, Winterbottom A, Jah A, Shaida N. Minimally invasive pancreatic necrosectomy; a technical pictorial review. Br J Radiol 2017; 91:20170435. [PMID: 29099617 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Necrotizing pancreatitis is the most severe form of acute pancreatitis, which is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Open necrosectomy has been one of the treatment modalities; however, it has been associated with high mortality rates and alternative minimally invasive procedures such as minimal invasive pancreatic necrosectomy (MIPN) were developed to improve on the outcomes. While current clinical evidence on MIPN showed significant advantages in terms of incidence of multiple organ failure, incisional hernias and new-onset diabetes there were no differences in terms of mortality rate. In this pictorial review we are presenting the technical details of MIPN as a minimally invasive procedure for the debridement of the necrotic pancreatic tissue and we will discuss the current evidence around the use of this procedure for the management of pancreatic necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory C Makris
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals , Oxford , UK.,2 Department of Infectious diseases, Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences , Athens , Greece
| | - Teikchoon See
- 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals , Cambridge , UK
| | - Andrew Winterbottom
- 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals , Cambridge , UK
| | - Asif Jah
- 4 Surgical Division, Cambridge University Hospital , Cambridge , UK
| | - Nadeem Shaida
- 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals , Cambridge , UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Amin I, Butler AJ, Defries G, Russell NK, Harper SJF, Jah A, Saeb-Parsy K, Pettigrew GJ, Watson CJE. A single-centre experience of Roux-en-Y enteric drainage for pancreas transplantation. Transpl Int 2017; 30:410-419. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.12920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2016] [Revised: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Irum Amin
- Department of Surgery; Addenbrooke's Hospital; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Andrew J. Butler
- Department of Surgery; Addenbrooke's Hospital; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Gail Defries
- Department of Surgery; Addenbrooke's Hospital; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Neil K. Russell
- Department of Surgery; Addenbrooke's Hospital; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Simon J. F. Harper
- Department of Surgery; Addenbrooke's Hospital; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery; Addenbrooke's Hospital; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Kourosh Saeb-Parsy
- Department of Surgery; Addenbrooke's Hospital; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Gavin J. Pettigrew
- Department of Surgery; Addenbrooke's Hospital; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chatzizacharias NA, Rosich-Medina A, Dajani K, Harper S, Huguet E, Liau SS, Praseedom RK, Jah A. Surgical management of hepato-pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 9:70-77. [PMID: 28255428 PMCID: PMC5314203 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i2.70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 11/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the outcomes of liver and pancreatic resections for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastatic disease.
METHODS This is a retrospective, single centre review of liver and/or pancreatic resections for RCC metastases between January 2003 and December 2015. Descriptive statistical analysis and survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier estimation were performed.
RESULTS Thirteen patients had 7 pancreatic and 7 liver resections, with median follow-up 33 mo (range: 3-98). Postoperative complications were recorded in 5 cases, with no postoperative mortality. Three patients after hepatic and 5 after pancreatic resection developed recurrent disease. Median overall survival was 94 mo (range: 23-94) after liver and 98 mo (range: 3-98) after pancreatic resection. Disease-free survival was 10 mo (range 3-55) after liver and 28 mo (range 3-53) after pancreatic resection.
CONCLUSION Our study shows that despite the high incidence of recurrence, long term survival can be achieved with resection of hepatic and pancreatic RCC metastases in selected cases and should be considered as a management option in patients with oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
|
23
|
Patel K, Dajani K, Iype S, Chatzizacharias NA, Vickramarajah S, Singh P, Davies S, Brais R, Liau SS, Harper S, Jah A, Praseedom RK, Huguet EL. Incidental non-benign gallbladder histopathology after cholecystectomy in an United Kingdom population: Need for routine histological analysis? World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8:685-692. [PMID: 27830040 PMCID: PMC5081550 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i10.685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Revised: 06/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To analyse the range of histopathology detected in the largest published United Kingdom series of cholecystectomy specimens and to evaluate the rational for selective histopathological analysis.
METHODS Incidental gallbladder malignancy is rare in the United Kingdom with recent literature supporting selective histological assessment of gallbladders after routine cholecystectomy. All cholecystectomy gallbladder specimens examined by the histopathology department at our hospital during a five year period between March 2008 and March 2013 were retrospectively analysed. Further data was collected on all specimens demonstrating carcinoma, dysplasia and polypoid growths.
RESULTS The study included 4027 patients. The majority (97%) of specimens exhibited gallstone or cholecystitis related disease. Polyps were demonstrated in 44 (1.09%), the majority of which were cholesterol based (41/44). Dysplasia, ranging from low to multifocal high-grade was demonstrated in 55 (1.37%). Incidental primary gallbladder adenocarcinoma was detected in 6 specimens (0.15%, 5 female and 1 male), and a single gallbladder revealed carcinoma in situ (0.02%). This large single centre study demonstrated a full range of gallbladder disease from cholecystectomy specimens, including more than 1% neoplastic histology and two cases of macroscopically occult gallbladder malignancies.
CONCLUSION Routine histological evaluation of all elective and emergency cholecystectomies is justified in a United Kingdom population as selective analysis has potential to miss potentially curable life threatening pathology.
Collapse
|
24
|
Naeem T, Kumar S, Fareed K, Jah A, Hindmarsh A, Shah N, Sujendran V. Spontaneous diaphragmatic rupture following robotic prostatectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 99:e44-e46. [PMID: 27659378 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Robotic surgery is an established therapy for localised prostate cancer and is replacing conventional laparoscopic prostatectomy in developed countries. Port-site hernia is a recognised, albeit small, risk following laparoscopic or robotic surgery. We report a case of spontaneous rupture of the right hemidiaphragm following robotic prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Naeem
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - S Kumar
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - K Fareed
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - A Jah
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - A Hindmarsh
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - N Shah
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - V Sujendran
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chatzizacharias NA, Bradley JA, Harper S, Butler A, Jah A, Huguet E, Praseedom RK, Allison M, Gibbs P. Successful surgical management of ruptured umbilical hernias in cirrhotic patients. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:3109-3113. [PMID: 25780312 PMCID: PMC4356934 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.3109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2014] [Revised: 09/11/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute umbilical hernia rupture in patients with hepatic cirrhosis and ascites is an unusual, but potentially life-threatening complication, with postoperative morbidity about 70% and mortality between 60%-80% after supportive care and 6%-20% after urgent surgical repair. Management options include primary surgical repair with or without concomitant portal venous system decompression for the control of the ascites. We present a retrospective analysis of our centre’s experience over the last 6 years. Our cohort consisted of 11 consecutive patients (median age: 53 years, range: 36-63 years) with advanced hepatic cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Appropriate patient resuscitation and optimisation with intravenous fluids, prophylactic antibiotics and local measures was instituted. One failed attempt for conservative management was followed by a successful primary repair. In all cases, with one exception, a primary repair with non-absorbable Nylon, interrupted sutures, without mesh, was performed. The perioperative complication rate was 25% and the recurrence rate 8.3%. No mortality was recorded. Median length of hospital stay was 14 d (range: 4-31 d). Based on our experience, the management of ruptured umbilical hernias in patients with advanced hepatic cirrhosis and refractory ascites is feasible without the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt routinely in the preoperative period, provided that meticulous patient optimisation is performed.
Collapse
|
26
|
Elias A, Chatzizacharias NA, Xanthis A, Corrie P, Davies S, Brais RJ, Jamieson NV, Praseedom RK, Huguet E, Harper SJF, Jah A. Salvage pancreaticoduodenectomy after complete response to chemoradiotherapy for a previously unresectable pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94:e499. [PMID: 25674740 PMCID: PMC4602766 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000000499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is known for its typically late presentation and poor survival rates, with overall 5-year survival of less than 5%. The role of chemotherapy alone or with radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced tumors continues to be an area of debate.We report a case of locally advanced, pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma that was initially deemed unresectable intraoperatively. Nonetheless, the tumor was resected after radiological response to gemcitabine-capecitabine chemoradiotherapy regimen similar to the Selective Chemoradiation in Advanced LOcalised Pancreatic cancer trial. Histological examination revealed complete pathological response with extensive fibrosis (ypT0 N0). On 12-month follow-up CT, a single liver lesion in the left lateral segment was identified and confirmed to be a metastasis with cytological diagnosis via EUS and FNA. The disease remained stable and confined to the solitary hepatic metastasis after further gemcitabine chemotherapy. Therefore, a further successful resection was performed.The 2 main strategies for the management of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer are chemotherapy induction followed by consolidation chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, with conflicting published evidence. Evidence for the optimal management of the rare histological type of adenosquamous carcinoma is scant. We present a case of such tumor with a complete pathological response to chemoradiotherapy. The results of future studies in the area are eagerly awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Elias
- From the Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery (AE, NAC, AX, NVJ, RKP, EH, SJFH, AJ); Department of Oncology (PC); and Department of Histopathology (SD, RJB), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zelga P, Ali JM, Brais R, Harper SJF, Liau SS, Huguet EL, Jamieson NV, Praseedom RK, Jah A. Negative predictive value of drain amylase concentration for development of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreatology 2014; 15:179-84. [PMID: 25579809 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Revised: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the major source of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy. A predictive indicator would be highly advantageous. One potential marker is drain amylase concentration (DAC). However, its predictive value has not been fully established. METHODS 405 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at our centre over a 10 year period were reviewed to determine the value of DAC as a predictive indicator for the development of POPF. RESULTS POPF developed in 58 patients (14%). These patients suffered greater morbidity. Overall 30-day mortality was 1.5%. Male gender (OR: 5.1; p = 0.0082) and age > 70 (OR 2; p = 0.0372) were independent risk factors for POPF, whilst Type 2 diabetes (OR: 0.2321; p = 0.0090) and pancreatic ductal-adenocarcinoma (OR: 0.3721; p = 0.0039) decreased POPF risk. The DACs post-operatively were significantly higher in those developing POPF, but with significant overlap. ROC curves revealed optimal threshold values for differentiating POPF and non-POPF patients. A DAC°<°1400 U/ml on day 1 and <768 U/ml on day 2, although having a poor positive predictive value (32-44%), had a very strong negative predictive value (97-99%). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that post-operative DAC below the determined optimal threshold values on day 1 and 2 following pancreaticoduodenectomy carries high negative predictive value for POPF development and identifies patients in whom early drain removal, and enhanced recovery may be considered, with simultaneous assessment of operative and clinical factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Zelga
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jason M Ali
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Rebecca Brais
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon J F Harper
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Siong-Seng Liau
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emmanuel L Huguet
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Neville V Jamieson
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raaj K Praseedom
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Asif Jah
- HPB & Transplant Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Iype S, Butler A, Jamieson N, Middleton S, Jah A. Delayed dynamic abdominal wall closure following multi-visceral transplantation. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014; 5:988-91. [PMID: 25460454 PMCID: PMC4276090 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2014] [Revised: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary closure of the abdominal wall following intestinal transplantation or multivisceral transplantation could become a challenging problem in a significant number of patients. PRESENTATION OF CASE A 38-year-old woman with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) underwent a multi-visceral transplantation for short gut syndrome. She subsequently developed acute graft rejection that proved resistant to conventional treatment. She was relisted and underwent re-transplantation along with kidney transplantation. Abdominal wall closure could not be achieved because of the large size of the graft and bowel oedema. The wound was initially managed with laparostomy followed by insertion of the delayed dynamic abdominal closure (DDAC) device (Abdominal Retraction Anchor – ABRA® system). Continuous dynamic traction to the wound edges resulted in gradual approximation and complete closure of the abdominal wound was achieved within 3 weeks. DISCUSSION Successful abdominal closure after multivisceral transplantation or isolated intestinal transplantation often requires biological mesh, vascularised flaps or abdominal wall transplantation. DDAC eliminated the need for a prosthetic mesh or skin graft and provided an excellent cosmetic result. Adjustment of the dynamic traction at the bedside minimised the need for multiple returns to the operating theatre. It resulted in a well-healed linear scar without a hernia. CONCLUSION Dynamic traction allows delayed closure of laparotomy resulting in strong and cosmetically sound wound healing with native tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satheesh Iype
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Andrew Butler
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Neville Jamieson
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Stephen Middleton
- Department of Gastrenterology, Cambridge University Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ali JM, See TC, Wiseman O, Griffiths WJH, Jah A. Salvage of liver transplant with hepatolithiasis by percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic hepatolithotomy. Transpl Int 2014; 27:e126-8. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.12387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M. Ali
- Cambridge Transplant Unit; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust; Cambridge UK
| | - Teik C. See
- Department of Interventional Radiology; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust; Cambridge UK
| | - Oliver Wiseman
- Department of Urology; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust; Cambridge UK
| | | | - Asif Jah
- Cambridge Transplant Unit; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust; Cambridge UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Balakrishnan A, Abbadi R, Oakland K, Jamdar S, Harper SJ, Jamieson NV, Huguet EL, Jah A, Praseedom RK. Outcomes following liver trauma in equestrian accidents. J Trauma Manag Outcomes 2014; 8:13. [PMID: 25177363 PMCID: PMC4148498 DOI: 10.1186/1752-2897-8-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Equestrian sports are common outdoor activities that may carry a risk of liver injury. Due to the relative infrequency of equestrian accidents the injury patterns and outcomes associated with liver trauma in these patients have not been well characterized. Methods We examined our experience of the management of equestrian liver trauma in our regional hepatopancreaticobiliary unit at a tertiary referral center. The medical records of patients who sustained liver trauma secondary to equestrian activities were analysed for parameters such as demographic data, liver function tests, patterns of injury, radiological findings, the need for intervention and outcomes. Results 20 patients sustained liver trauma after falling from or being kicked by a horse. The majority of patients were haemodynamically stable on admission. Alanine transaminase (ALT) levels were elevated in all patients and right-sided rib fractures were a frequently associated finding. CT demonstrated laceration of the liver in 12 patients, contusion in 3 and subcapsular haematoma in 2. The right lobe of the liver was most commonly affected. Only two patients required laparotomy and liver resection; the remaining 18 were successfully managed conservatively. Conclusions The risk of liver injury following a horse kick or falling off a horse should not be overlooked. Early CT imaging is advised in these patients, particularly in the presence of high ALT levels and concomitant chest injuries such as rib fractures. Despite significant liver trauma, conservative management in the form of close observation, ideally in a high-dependency setting, is often sufficient. Laparotomy is only rarely warranted and associated with a significantly higher risk of post-operative bile leaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital and Cambridge University, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Reyad Abbadi
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Marlborough Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Kathryn Oakland
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital and Cambridge University, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Saurabh Jamdar
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Simon Jf Harper
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital and Cambridge University, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Neville V Jamieson
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital and Cambridge University, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Emmanual L Huguet
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital and Cambridge University, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital and Cambridge University, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Raaj K Praseedom
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital and Cambridge University, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abbadi RA, Sadat U, Jah A, Praseedom RK, Jamieson NV, Cheow HK, Whitley S, Ford HE, Wilson CB, Harper SJF, Huguet EL. Improved long-term survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases following staging with FDG positron emission tomography. J Surg Oncol 2014; 110:313-9. [PMID: 24737685 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Actual long-term survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases staged by PET CT has not been reported. Objectives were to investigate whether PET CT staging results in actual improved long-term survival, to examine outcome in patients with 'equivocal' PET CT scans, and those excluded from hepatectomy by PET CT. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases between March 1998 and September 2008. RESULTS Overall 5- and 10-year survival was 44.8% and 23.9%. PET CT staging resulted in management changes in 23% of patients. PET CT staged patients showed significantly better survival than those staged by CT alone at 3 years (79.8% vs. 54.1%) and at 5 years (54.1% vs. 37.3%) with median survivals of 6.4 years versus 3.9 years (log rank P = 0.018). Patients with equivocal PET CT scans showed worse median survival than those with favourable PET CT (log rank P = 0.002), but may include a subpopulation whose prognosis trends towards a more favourable outcome than those excluded from liver resection by PET CT, whose median survival remains limited to 21 months. CONCLUSIONS Staging of patients with colorectal liver metastases by PET CT is associated with significantly improved actual long-term survival, and provides valuable prognostic information which guides surgical and oncological treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reyad A Abbadi
- Department of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ejtehadi F, Chatzizacharias NA, Brais RJ, Hall NR, Godfrey EM, Huguet E, Praseedom RK, Jah A. Colonic and anal metastases from pancreato-biliary malignancies. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:3693-3697. [PMID: 24707155 PMCID: PMC3974539 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Revised: 11/30/2013] [Accepted: 01/20/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreato-biliary malignancies often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment although less than 20% of tumours are suitable for resection at presentation. Common sites for metastases are liver, lungs, lymph nodes and peritoneal cavity. Metastatic disease carries poor prognosis, with median survival of less than 3 mo. We report two cases where metastases from pancreato-biliary cancers were identified in the colon and anal canal. In both cases specific immunohistochemical staining was utilised in the diagnosis. In the first case, the presenting complaint was obstructive jaundice due to an ampullary tumour for which a pancreato-duodenectomy was carried out. However, the patient re-presented 4 wk later with an atypical anal fissure which was found to be metastatic deposit from the primary ampullary adenocarcinoma. In the second case, the patient presented with obstructive jaundice due to a biliary stricture. Subsequent imaging revealed sigmoid thickening, which was confirmed to be a metastatic deposit. Distal colonic and anorectal metastases from pancreato-biliary cancers are rare and can masquerade as primary colorectal tumours. The key to the diagnosis is the specific immunohistochemical profile of the intestinal lesion biopsies.
Collapse
|
33
|
Ali JM, Liau SS, Gunning K, Jah A, Huguet EL, Praseedom RK, Jamieson NV. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Auditing the 10 year experience of a single centre. Surgeon 2012; 10:267-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2011.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2011] [Revised: 08/13/2011] [Accepted: 08/15/2011] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
34
|
Ma R, Balakrishnan A, See TC, Liau SS, Praseedom R, Jah A. Extra-hepatic portal vein aneurysm: A case report, overview of the literature and suggested management algorithm. Int J Surg Case Rep 2012; 3:555-8. [PMID: 22922358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2012.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2012] [Accepted: 07/23/2012] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Portal venous aneurysms are a rare finding. The reported incidence is on the rise with increasing use of modern imaging techniques in clinical practice. However, there is still much to be elicited regarding their aetiology, natural history, and management. PRESENTATION OF CASE An 80-year-old woman presented with abdominal pain and nausea. Investigations showed a hypoechoic area in the region of the head of pancreas on ultrasound, which was found to be a portal venous aneurysm on CT. In view of her multiple comorbidities, a conservative approach was taken. DISCUSSION Portal venous aneurysms represent approximately 3% of all venous aneurysms with a reported prevalence of 0.43%. They may be congenital, due to failure of complete regression of the right vitelline vein, or acquired secondary to portal hypertension. The primary presentation of portal vein aneurysm is abdominal pain, followed by incidental detection on imaging, with a minority of patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding. Complications of PVA include thrombosis, biliary tract obstruction, inferior vena cava obstruction, and duodenal compression. On the whole PVAs are stable and have a low risk of complications with 88% of patients showing no progression of aneurysm size or complications on subsequent follow up scans. CONCLUSION We recommend that portal venous aneurysms be assessed using colour Doppler ultrasonography in the first instance with CT scans reserved for indeterminate cases or symptomatic patients. Due to the slow progression of such aneurysms, surgery is recommended only for symptomatic patients or those with complications secondary to portal venous aneurysms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruichong Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Brais RJ, Davies SE, O'Donovan M, Simpson BW, Cook N, Darbonne WC, Chilcott S, Lolkema MP, Neesse A, Lockley M, Corrie PG, Jodrell DI, Praseedom RK, Huguet EL, Jah A, Jamieson NV, de Sauvage FJ, Tuveson DA, Carroll NR. Direct histological processing of EUS biopsies enables rapid molecular biomarker analysis for interventional pancreatic cancer trials. Pancreatology 2012; 12:8-15. [PMID: 22487467 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2011.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current practice to diagnose pancreatic cancer is accomplished by endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) using a cytological approach. This method is time consuming and often fails to provide suitable specimens for modern molecular analyses. Here, we compare the cytological approach with direct formalin fixation of pancreatic EUS-FNA micro-cores and evaluate the potential to perform molecular biomarker analysis on these specimen. METHODS 130 specimens obtained by EUS-FNA with a 22G needle were processed by the standard cytological approach and compared to a separate cohort of 130 specimens that were immediately formalin fixed to preserve micro-cores of tissue prior to routine histological processing. RESULTS We found that direct formalin fixation significantly shortened the time required for diagnosis from 3.6 days to 2.9 days (p<0.05) by reducing the average time (140 vs 33 min/case) and number of slides (9.65 vs 4.67 slides/case) for histopathological processing. Specificity and sensitivity yielded comparable results between the two approaches (82.3% vs 77% and 90.9% vs 100%). Importantly, EUS-FNA histology preserved the tumour tissue architecture with neoplastic glands embedded in stroma in 67.89% of diagnostic cases compared to 27.55% with the standard cytological approach (p < 0.001). Furthermore, micro-core samples were suitable for molecular studies including the immunohistochemical detection of intranuclear Hes1 in malignant cells, and the laser-capture microdissection-mediated measurement of Gli-1 mRNA in tumour stromal myofibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS Direct formalin fixation of pancreatic EUS-FNA micro-cores demonstrates superiority regarding diagnostic delay, costs, and specimen suitability for molecular studies. We advocate this approach for future investigational trials in pancreatic cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Brais
- Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dawwas MF, Jah A, Griffiths WJH, Winterbottom AP, Huguet EL, Gimson AE. Image of the month. Jejunal diverticular perforation secondary to delayed distal migration of biliary endoprosthesis. Arch Surg 2011; 146:483-4. [PMID: 21502461 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.54-a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad F Dawwas
- Cambridge Hepatobiliary Service, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
The authors report the case of a 62-year-old lady who had never lived overseas and who presented with symptoms of gastric outflow obstruction with weight loss. Endoscopic investigation demonstrated a tight, impassable stricture in the second part of the duodenum, with CT demonstrating a mass and surrounding lymphadenopathy. Extrinsic compression at this site in UK residents in late middle age usually heralds a diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy. In this case, investigation by endoscopic ultrasound with sampling of an otherwise inaccessible lymph node to obtain 'micro biopsies' by fine needle aspiration allowed a diagnosis of duodenal tuberculosis. The patient has responded to appropriate antibiotic therapy and is now well.
Collapse
|
38
|
Xiu PY, Iype S, Vyas V, Jah A. Corrigendum to “Surgical site infection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective analysis of a single-centre experience” [Int J Surg 8 (2010) 528]. Int J Surg 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
39
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute sigmoid volvulus is one of the commonest causes of benign large bowel obstruction. Its incidence varies considerably from one geographic area to another. OBJECTIVE To review the management of acute sigmoid volvulus in a relatively high prevalence area. METHODS All adult patients with acute sigmoid volvulus seen at the Royal Victoria Teaching Hospital (RVTH) Banjul, between September 2000 and January 2005 were studied. Information obtained for analysis from the records included age, sex, clinical features, test results, and outcomes. RESULTS A total of 48 patients, 45 (93.8%) males and three (6.3%) females, with a male: female ratio of 14.3:1, age range of 19 to 78 years and mean age of 45.8 +17.6 years, underwent treatment for acute sigmoid volvulus. Twenty-one (43.8%) of the patients were aged 40 to 59 years. Two (4.2%) had rectal tube detortion followed by elective sigmoidectomy and primary anastomosis on the same admission, while 24 (50%) had emergency laparotomy at which bowel decompression, one-stage resection and primary anastomosis without on-table lavage was done. The rest of the patients, 22 (45.8%) had gangrenous sigmoid colons at laparotomy and consequently had Hartmann's procedure done. Fourteen patients (29.1%) developed wound infection and five (10.4%) had prolonged ileus that was managed conservatively. There was no anastomotic leak. The mean hospital stay was 11.1 days. There were five deaths giving a mortality rate of 10.4%. CONCLUSION Acute sigmoid volvulus in the Gambia is almost exclusively a male disease. Sigmoid colectomy and primary anastomosis can be carried out safely in those with viable colon without on-table colonic lavage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Nuhu
- Department of Surgery, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, P.M.B. 1414, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Monk IP, Lahiri R, Sivaprakasam R, Malhotra S, Praseedom RK, Jah A. Adrenocortical oncocytoma: Review of imaging and histopathological implications. Int J Surg Case Rep 2010; 1:30-2. [PMID: 22096671 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2010.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2010] [Accepted: 08/30/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncocytomas are rare tumours of the adrenal glands whose malignant potential is difficult to assess with certainty. We report a case of an adrenal oncocytoma and present a review of the literature particularly with regards to the radiological and histopathological features and their impact on the management.Adrenal oncocytomas are usually identified incidentally on imaging and can achieve large sizes. They should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any large upper abdominal lesion including those apparently arising from the liver as in this case report. MRI scan appears to be the ideal imaging modality to characterise such lesions. There seems to be little benefit in biopsying these masses and surgery remains the most optimal management. It remains difficult to predict metastatic behaviour based on histological findings and so long term surveillance is advisable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I P Monk
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ausania F, Cook N, Jamieson N, Huguet E, Jah A, Praseedom R. Impact of pancreatic leaks on survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP 2010; 11:226-229. [PMID: 20442516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Pancreatic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy has a major impact on postoperative mortality. However, it is not clear whether pancreatic leaks affect long term survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to compare the long term outcome in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, with and without postoperative pancreatic leak. PATIENTS All 133 patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy at the HepatoPancreatoBiliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, between June 2002 and June 2007 were identified from a prospectively held database. The study was restricted to 47 patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. SETTING Pancreatic leak was defined as drain fluid amylase more than three times the serum level for more than 3 days post operatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Long term survival of patients with and without leaks were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and significance was measured using the log-rank test. RESULTS Median follow-up was 30.8 months. The median actuarial survival of all ductal adenocarcinoma patients was 19 months. Pancreatic leaks occurred in 9 patients (19.1%). There were no significant differences in the overall survival or presence of recurrence between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy does not appear to impact on long-term outcome of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Ausania
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rosich-Medina A, Liau S, Jah A, Huguet E, See T, Jamieson N, Praseedom R. Cutaneous metastases from cholangiocarcinoma following percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: Case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 2010. [PMCID: PMC6099555 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2010.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is commonly used in the management of cholangiocarcioma. Major and minor complications of PTBD such as cholangitis, haemorrhage and catheter dislocation are well documented. A lesser reported complication are cutaneous metastases following PTBD for cholangiocarcinoma. We report a case of a 79 year old man who presented with right upper quadrant pain, jaundice and weight loss, with dilated intra-hepatic bile ducts on imaging. The cytology results from a sample taken during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were highly suspicious of cholangiocarcioma. A PTBD was subsequently performed and bilateral metal biliary stents were placed without external drainage. Five months after the PTBD he was found to have a hard nodule under the PTBD puncture site. The nodule was excised and the histology confirmed a cholangiocarcinoma metastasis. A review of the literature identified twelve cases of cutaneous metastases from cholangiocarcinoma, following PTBD. In addition, tumour seeding along the catheter tract following PTBD, with metastatic deposits on the abdominal wall, peritoneoum, chest wall, pleural space, and liver parenchyma have also been reported. Health care professionals should be aware of this rare complication and offer appropriate management options to patients.
Collapse
|
43
|
Sivaprakasam R, Lahiri R, Mohamed S, Liau S, Huguet E, Jamieson N, Praseedom R, Jah A. Outcome Following Whipple\'S Pancreatoduodenectomy in the Elderly: The Cambridge Experience. Int J Surg 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
44
|
Iype S, Xiu PY, Jah A. Surgical Site Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Analysis of A Single-Centre Experience. Int J Surg 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
45
|
Liau SS, Jah A, Huguet E, Jamieson N, Praseedom R. A useful reconstruction arrangement following Whipple's resection for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009; 91:618-9. [PMID: 19842250 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2009.91.7.618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Siong-Seng Liau
- Hepato-pancreato-biliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Jah A, Jamieson N, Huguet E, Praseedom R. The implications of the presence of an aberrant right hepatic artery in patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Today 2009; 39:669-74. [PMID: 19639433 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-009-3947-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2008] [Accepted: 01/07/2009] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE An aberrant right hepatic artery (ARHA) is a common anomaly and its implications for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have not yet been previously reported. We compared the outcomes following PD in patients with and without an ARHA. A novel classification of the anatomical course of ARHA, and surgical techniques for its identification and preservation are described herein. METHODS All patients undergoing PD between June 1, 2002, and May 31, 2007, were divided into two groups, one with ARHA and the other without. These groups were compared to identify differences in the intraoperative variables, the oncological clearance, the postoperative complications, and the survival. RESULTS A total of 135 patients underwent PD of which 28 (20.8%) patients were found to have either accessory or replaced right hepatic arteries (ARHA group). There were no significant differences in the intraoperative variables (blood loss and operative time) and the incidence of postoperative complications (pancreatic leak and delayed gastric emptying). Oncological clearance (nodal yield and resection margins) and survival were also similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The surgical and oncological outcomes of PD remain unaffected by the presence of ARHA provided that the anatomy is recognized and appropriately managed. Aberrant right hepatic artery can be classified into three types according to their anatomical relationship with the head of the pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asif Jah
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kullar P, Stonard C, Jamieson N, Huguet E, Praseedom R, Jah A. Primary hepatic embryonal sarcoma masquerading as metastatic ovarian cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2009; 7:55. [PMID: 19549298 PMCID: PMC2705365 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-7-55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2009] [Accepted: 06/23/2009] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic embryonal sarcoma (HES) is a rare but aggressive primary tumor of the liver occurring most frequently in childhood. CASE PRESENTATION We report a case of a 52 year old woman having previously undergone treatment for ovarian serous papillary carcinoma who subsequently presented with a large solitary mass in the liver. Initially this was presumed to be metastasis from the ovarian primary however, on further examination it was shown to be a primary hepatic embryonal sarcoma. CONCLUSION Primary liver tumors should be considered in differential diagnoses in patients with ovarian cancer who subsequently present with liver tumors. This is particularly important when there is no direct evidence of recurrence of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Kullar
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Saeb-Parsy K, Jah A, Butler AJ, Large S, Pettigrew GJ, Praseedom RK, Watson CJ, Jamieson NV. Use of a donor aortic interposition allograft to treat stenosis of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2009; 15:662-5. [PMID: 19479812 DOI: 10.1002/lt.21655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kourosh Saeb-Parsy
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Al-Ghnaniem R, Jah A, Huguet EL, Jamieson NV, Praseedom RK. Interposition graft with polytetrafluoroethylene for mesenteric and portal vein reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 247-252). Br J Surg 2009; 96:692; author reply 692-3. [PMID: 19434711 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published in the Journal. Letters must be no more than 250 words in length.
Collapse
|
50
|
Jah A, Jamieson N, Huguet E, Griffiths W, Carroll N, Praseedom R. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided drainage of an abdominal fluid collection following Whipple’s resection. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14:6867-8. [PMID: 19058316 PMCID: PMC2773885 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.6867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous aspiration and drainage of post-operative abdominal fluid collections is a well established standard technique. However, some fluid collections are not amenable to percutaneous drainage either due to location or the presence of surrounding visceral structures. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) has been widely used for the drainage of pancreatitis-related abdominal fluid collections. However, there are no reports on the use of this technique in the post-operative setting. We report a case where the EUS-guided technique was used to drain a percutaneously inaccessible post-operative collection which had developed after Whipple’s resection.
Collapse
|