Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: a Cohort Analysis

Optimal treatment strategy and prognostic analysis for patients with non-metastatic pT4 colon adenocarcinoma

Objective

This study endeavored to explore the optimal treatment strategy and conduct a prognostic analysis for patients diagnosed with pT4M0 (pathologic stage T4) colon adenocarcinoma (COAD).

Methods and materials

A total of 8,843 patients diagnosed with pT4M0 COAD between January 2010 and December 2015 were included in this study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. These patients were randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set using a 7:3 ratio. Variables that demonstrated statistical significance (P<0.05) in univariate COX regression analysis or held clinical significance were incorporated into the multivariate COX regression model. Subsequently, this model was utilized to formulate a nomogram. The predictive accuracy and discriminability of the nomogram were assessed using the C-index, area under the curve (AUC), and calibration curves. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to confirm the clinical validity of the model.

Results

In the entire SEER cohort, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate (74.22% vs. 63.20%, P<0.001) and the 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate (76.25% vs. 66.98%, P<0.001) in the surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant therapy (S+ADT) group surpassed those in the surgery (S) group. Multivariate COX regression analysis of the training set unveiled correlations between age, race, N stage, serum CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen), differentiation, number of resected lymph nodes, and treatment modalities with OS and CSS. Nomograms for OS and CSS were meticulously crafted based on these variables, achieving C-indexes of 0.692 and 0.690 in the training set, respectively. The robust predictive ability of the nomogram was further affirmed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves in both the training and validation sets.

Conclusion

In individuals diagnosed with pT4M0 COAD, the integration of surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy demonstrated a substantial extension of long-term survival. The nomogram, which incorporated key factors such as age, race, differentiation, N stage, serum CEA level, tumor size, and the number of resected lymph nodes, stood as a dependable tool for predicting OS and CSS rates. This predictive model held promise in aiding clinicians by identifying high-risk patients and facilitating the development of personalized treatment plans.

Adaptive radiotherapy of locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer with intra‑fractional motion using the MRIdian system: A case report

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, when combined with radiotherapy, serves as an optional treatment for patients with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer and is usually performed in conjunction with complete mesocolic excision. The substantial movement of surrounding organs in cases of sigmoid colon cancer frequently leads to toxicity in normal tissues. The present report details the case of a 76-year-old man diagnosed with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer. Initially, treatment using the Tomotherapy Hi-Art system was selected; however, during image guidance from the first to the sixth fractions, the tumor location underwent a marked change, exceeding the range of the planning target volume. Efforts to recapture the image were unsuccessful, leading to a decision to transition the patient to the MRIdian system for daily treatment with online adaptive radiotherapy. The positional variations in the tumor were evident in each treatment using the MRIdian system, with mean shifts of 2.58 cm in the right-left direction, 1.24 cm in the cranial-caudal direction and 0.40 cm in the anterior-posterior direction. The mean time from the entry of the patient to treatment completion was 41 min. Adaptive treatment plans were performed for all 19 fractions, with two treatments repeated due to the tumor moving out of tracking range. Following irradiation using the MRIdian system, the gross tumor volume decreased by 62%. Notably, the patient experienced no side effects during treatment. A CT scan conducted 3 months after radiotherapy revealed a marked reduction in the tumor size, consistent with a partial response, leading to the scheduling of surgery. Following surgery, a CT scan after 6 months revealed no local recurrence in the surgical bed region. The findings in the present case support the feasibility of implementing an adaptive treatment plan using the MRIdian system for locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer in the context of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

The impact of laparoscopic, open, extended right, and left colectomy on clinical outcomes of splenic flexure colon cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention is the recommended line for the management of colon cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different surgical techniques (laparoscopic, open, extended right, and left colectomy) on clinical outcomes such as mortality, postoperative complications, operation and hospitalization time, and oncological factors.

METHODS

A total of 15 studies have been included in the current study. The outcomes of these studies were analyzed using a random-effect model and it was used to calculate the mean difference with 95% confidence intervals to quantify the impact of open, laparoscopic, extended right, and left colectomy. Inclusion criteria included studies in which subjects undergo splenic flexure colon cancer surgery with 2 comparable different surgical techniques.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic splenic flexure colon cancer surgery showed a significant beneficial impact on the length of hospital stay (P < .001), the volume of blood loss during surgery (P < .001), postoperative complications (P < .001), and time to an oral diet (P < .001). On the other hand, there was no significance regarding anastomotic leakage, infection of the surgical site, and operation time. Regarding the comparison between extended right colectomy (ERC) and lift colectomy (LC), analysis findings showed a significant (P = .001) higher efficacy of ERC in harvested number of lymph nodes compared with LC. On the other hand, there was no significant difference for the rest of the parameters. The neoadjuvant therapy as an influencing factor on postoperative outcome showed a beneficial impact regarding the overall survival rate.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic splenic flexure colon cancer surgery showed a significant beneficial impact compared with open surgery as proved by clinical outcomes. On the other hand, ERC and LC resulted in similar findings except for harvested lymph nodes, results were in favor of ERC.

Postoperative locoregional recurrence pattern and treatment management of stage pT4 sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the pattern of locoregional recurrence after surgery in patients with non-metastatic stage pT4 sigmoid colon cancer and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 208 patients who underwent surgery in our hospital. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation groups at a 1:1 ratio. Patients at high risk for locoregional recurrence were screened using Cox regression analysis. Based on the data of 2,886 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Of the 208 patients, 57 (27.4%) presented with locoregional recurrences (14 anastomotic and 43 abdominal or pelvic lymph node recurrences). Multivariate analysis showed that serum CEA, differentiation, lymph node dissection number, and N stage were independent predictors of locoregional recurrence-free survival (all p < 0.05). A risk-stratification model was constructed, and a total score of ≥ 6.5 points was considered the high-risk group for locoregional recurrence. Both the training and validation sets presented that the model had a good predictive ability (area under the curve = 0.828 and 0.724, respectively). Analysis of SEER data revealed that adjuvant radiotherapy significantly prolonged OS and CSS in the high-risk population (all p < 0.05, vs. no radiotherapy).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a total risk score of 6.5 or more had a high likelihood of locoregional recurrence, and perhaps adjuvant radiotherapy could improve their survival.

Neoadjuvant therapy versus direct to surgery for T4 colon cancer: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite persistently poor oncological outcomes, approaches to the management of T4 colonic cancer remain variable, with the role of neoadjuvant therapy unclear. The aim of this review was to compare oncological outcomes between direct-to-surgery and neoadjuvant therapy approaches to T4 colon cancer.

METHODS

A librarian-led systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL up to 11 February 2020 was performed. Inclusion criteria were primary research articles comparing oncological outcomes between neoadjuvant therapies or direct to surgery for primary T4 colonic cancer. Based on PRISMA guidelines, screening and data abstraction were undertaken in duplicate. Quality assessment was carried out using Cochrane risk-of-bias tools. Random-effects models were used to pool effect estimates. This study compared pathological resection margins, postoperative morbidity, and oncological outcomes of cancer recurrence and overall survival.

RESULTS

Four studies with a total of 43 063 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with direct to surgery, neoadjuvant therapy was associated with increased rates of margin-negative resection (odds ratio (OR) 2.60, 95 per cent c.i. 1.12 to 6.02; n = 15 487) and 5-year overall survival (pooled hazard ratio 1.42, 1.10 to 1.82, I2 = 0 per cent; n = 15 338). No difference was observed in rates of cancer recurrence (OR 0.42, 0.15 to 1.22; n = 131), 30-day minor (OR 1.12, 0.68 to 1.84; n = 15 488) or major (OR 0.62, 0.27 to 1.44; n = 15 488) morbidity, or rates of treatment-related adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Compared with direct to surgery, neoadjuvant therapy improves margin-negative resection rates and overall survival.

Critical reappraisal of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) is associated with surgical challenges during R0 resection, increased postoperative complications, and unfavorable treatment outcomes. Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection is an effective treatment strategy that can increase the complete surgical resection rate and improve the patient survival rate. This study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with LACC as well as the prognosis and long-term clinical outcomes of these patients.

MATERIALS

From January 2012 to July 2020, we retrospectively reviewed the real-world data of 75 patients with LACC who received neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). The following data were obtained from medical records: patients' characteristics, pathologic results, toxicity, and long-term oncologic outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 75 patients, 13 (17.3%) had pathologic complete responses. Hematologic adverse effects were the most common (grade 1 anemia: 80.0% and leukopenia: 82.7%). Conversely, grade 2 or 3 adverse effects were relatively uncommon (<10%). Pathologic N downstaging, ypT0, and pathologic complete responses were significant prognostic factors for patient survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that pathologic N downstaging was an independent predictor of patients' overall survival (P = 0.019). The estimated 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 68.6% and 50.6%, and the medians of overall and disease-free survival periods were 72.3 and 58.7 months, respectively. Moreover, patients with pathologic complete responses had improved overall survival (P = 0.039) and an improved local recurrence control rate (P = 0.042) but an unfavorable distant metastasis control rate (P = 0.666) in the long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The long-term oncologic outcome of patients with LACC following concurrent chemoradiotherapy is acceptable, and the adverse effects seem to be tolerable. Pathologic N downstaging was an independent prognostic factor for patients' overall survival. However, a large prospective, randomized control study is required to confirm the current results.

Prognostic analysis and beneficiary identification of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy for stage pT4b sigmoid colon cancer

The clinical efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy in sigmoid colon cancer remains questioned. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with pathologic stage T4b sigmoid colon cancer. Patients with stage pT4b sigmoid colon cancer receiving adjuvant EBRT or not followed by surgery between 2004 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Analysis of overall survival (OS) was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and prognostic factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression models with 95% confidence intervals within the entire cohort. A risk-stratification system was then developed based on the β regression coefficient. Among 2073 patients, 284 (13.7%) underwent adjuvant EBRT. The median OS in the group receiving adjuvant EBRT was significantly longer than that in the non-radiotherapy group (p < 0.001). Age, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, perineural invasion, lymph node dissection (LND) number, and adjuvant EBRT were independent factors associated with OS. A risk-stratification system was generated, which showed that low-risk patients had a higher 5-year survival rate than high-risk patients (75.6% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.001). Adjuvant EBRT significantly prolonged the 5-year survival rate of high-risk patients (62.6% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.009) but showed no survival benefit among low-risk patients (87.7% vs. 73.2%, p = 0.100). Our risk-stratification model comprising age, serum CEA, perineural invasion, and LND number predicted the outcomes of patients with stage pT4b sigmoid colon cancer based on which subgroup of high-risk patients should receive adjuvant EBRT.

Interventions and Outcomes for Neoadjuvant Treatment of T4 Colon Cancer: A Scoping Review

While adjuvant treatment of colon cancers that penetrate the serosa (T4) have been well-established, neoadjuvant strategies have yet to be formally evaluated. Our objective was to perform a scoping review of eligibility criteria, treatment regimens, and primary outcomes for neoadjuvant approaches to T4 colon cancer. A librarian-led, systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL up to 11 February 2020 was performed. Primary research evaluating neoadjuvant treatment in T4 colon cancer were included. Screening and data abstraction were performed in duplicate; analyses were descriptive or thematic. A total of twenty studies were included, most of which were single-arm, single-center, and retrospective. The primary objectives of the literature to date has been to evaluate treatment feasibility, tumor response, disease-free survival, and overall survival in healthy patients. Conventional XELOX and FOLFOX chemotherapy were the most commonly administered interventions. Rationale for selecting a specific regimen and for treatment eligibility criteria were poorly documented across studies. The current literature on neoadjuvant strategies for T4 colon cancer is overrepresented by single-center, retrospective studies that evaluate treatment feasibility and efficacy in healthy patients. Future studies should prioritize evaluating clear selection criteria and rationale for specific neoadjuvant strategies. Validation of outcomes in multi-center, randomized trials for XELOX and FOLFOX have the most to contribute to the growing evidence for this poorly managed disease.

Outcomes of Partial or Total Cystectomy in Advanced Colon Cancer with Suspected Bladder Invasion-Our 8-Year Experience and Literature Review

PURPOSE

Advanced colon cancers with bladder invasion pose a heavy burden and challenge towards patients and surgeons. Herein, we report our series with regards to operative and oncological outcomes in our 8 years of experience.

METHODS

All patients with advanced colonic tumours and suspected bladder invasion being operated from 2012 to 2020 were included. The histological findings, clinical and oncological outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included. Partial cystectomy was performed in 17 of them (77%). No neoadjuvant treatment was prescribed. All preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showed bladder invasion or colovesical fistula. True tumour invasion to bladder (T4b disease) was confirmed in 17 patients (77%) by histopathology. The 3-year overall survival and recurrence rates were 82% and 9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

En bloc resection of colonic tumour with adherent bladder in advanced colon cancers can achieve a good operative and oncological outcome without neoadjuvant therapy. The relatively low concordance rate between preoperative CT scan and final histopathology may limit the benefit of routine administration of neoadjuvant therapy as it may overtreat and delay subsequent oncological treatment of our patients with possible added morbidity.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable radically locally advanced colon cancer: a potential improvement to overall survival and decrease to multivisceral resection

Background

The management of unresectable locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) remains controversial, as resection is not feasible. The goal of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with unresectable radically LACC.

Methods

We included patients who were diagnosed at our institution, 2010–2018. The neoadjuvant regimen consisted of radiotherapy and capecitabine/ 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Results

One hundred patients were identified. The median follow-up time was 32 months. The R0 resection rate, adjusted nonmultivisceral resection rate and bladder preservation rate were 83.0, 43.0 and 83.3%, respectively. The pCR and clinical-downstaging rates were 18, and 81.0%%, respectively. The 3-year PFS and OS rates for all patients were 68.6 and 82.1%, respectively. Seventeen patients developed grade 3–4 myelosuppression, which was the most common adverse event observed after NACRT. Tumor perforation occurred in 3 patients during NACRT. The incidence of grade 3–4 surgery-related complications was 7.0%. Postoperative anastomotic leakage was observed in 3 patients.

Conclusions

NACRT followed by surgery was feasible and safe for selected patients with LACC, and can be used as a conversion treatment to achieve satisfactory downstaging, long-term survival and quality of life, with acceptable toxicities.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07894-6.

Assessing the Effect of Radiotherapy in Addition to Surgery in Colon Adenocarcinomas: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Evidence

PURPOSE

This study aims to review the contemporary evidence investigating radiotherapy (RT) in addition to surgery for colon adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

We searched the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, ASCOpubs, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies (since January 2005) comparing outcomes of high-risk colon adenocarcinomas who underwent RT in addition to surgery versus no RT were eligible. Pooling of outcomes from published results or from analysis of survival curves was done. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine if the efficacy of RT varies with RT timing.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included (five retrospective cohorts, three population-based studies). Pooled analysis from retrospective cohorts showed a reduction in 5-year LR (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.21-0.79; p = 0.007) in the RT group. A benefit in 3-year (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.15-2.87; p = 0.01) and 5-year (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.21-3.63; p = 0.008) DFS and in 3-year (OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.43-4.54; p = 0.001) and 5-year (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.17-3.41; p = 0.01) OS was seen in the RT group. The OS benefit was demonstrated in the subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant RT, but not with adjuvant RT. The improvement in OS with neoadjuvant RT was supported by a population-based study from NCDB, while results from two population-based studies investigating adjuvant RT were conflicting.

CONCLUSION

Taking into account the limitations of the studies, our review of evidence suggests a possible role of RT in improving oncologic outcomes of select colon adenocarcinomas. Prospective studies are needed to definitively assess the value of RT for colon cancer.

The survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T4N2M0 colon cancer in the Modern Chemotherapy Era: evidence from the SEER database 2004-2015

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been established as the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the role of radiotherapy (RT) has not been fully confirmed in advanced colon cancer (LACC). We postulated that patients with pathological T4N2 locally advanced colon cancer would benefit more from RT. 6715 pT4N2M0 colon cancer patients were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards' models was performed to estimate prognosis. Before PSM, patients underwent RT had better OS and CSS as compared to patients did not receive RT (OS: 40.1% vs 27.6%, p < .001; CSS: 49.6% vs 41.1%, p = .002). After PSM, 239 matched pairs were formed for further analysis. RT group also presented significantly improved prognosis (OS: 40.1% vs 25.7%, p = .008; CSS: 49.6% vs 38.2%, p = .042). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that RT was a protective factor [OS：Hazard ratio (HR) =0.677, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.532-0.862, p = .002; CSS: HR = 0.708, 95% CI: 0.533-0.941, p = .018]. For pT4N2M0 colon cancer patients, the addition of RT seems to confer survival benefit as compared to patients who did not receive RT.

Preoperative radiation as part of a multidisciplinary strategy for a medically inoperable patient with a bleeding colon cancer

An 84-year-old man with a history of deep vein thrombosis on warfarin and coronary artery disease presented with haematochezia and was diagnosed with an ascending colon cancer. He was short of breath with lower extremity oedema at the initial surgical consultation. Evaluation revealed an acute exacerbation of congestive heart failure, and further workup and treatment were recommended by the cardiology team. After multidisciplinary discussion, he underwent radiation for the control of bleeding, followed by cardiac catheterisation and placement of a bare metal stent. The patient subsequently underwent robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy. Pathology demonstrated a complete response, and the patient recovered uneventfully. He is alive swith no evidence of disease recurrence 12 months after surgery and 18 months after initial diagnosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography colonography for tumor depth in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accurate preoperative determination of tumor depth is a major concern in colorectal cancer. Assessment of tumor depth can influence the treatment strategy for colorectal cancer, but there is currently no universal diagnostic standard. This review sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography for tumor infiltration depth in colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched to identify studies that compared the tumor depth using CT colonography with that determined using pathological assessment. Relevant data were extracted from the eligible studies by two review authors working independently. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The diagnostic performance of CT colonography for tumor depth in colorectal cancer was evaluated by meta-analysis using sensitivity and specificity values and diagnostic odds ratios.

RESULTS

The systematic literature search identified 16 eligible studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values and diagnostic odds ratios were 97.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1-99.6), 76.4% (95% CI 59.9-87.5), and 142.6 (95% CI 20.0-1071.0) for T2 invasion, 97.7% (95% CI 92.1-99.3), 83.5% (95% CI 75.9-89.0), and 212.1 (95% CI 50.6-888.1) for T3 invasion, and 84.9% (95% CI 61.7-95.1), 97.5% (95% CI 93.2-99.1), and 219.5 (95% CI 37.8-1273.6) for T4 invasion, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CT colonography was found to have high diagnostic performance and was useful for determining tumor depth in colorectal cancer.

A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Despite the progress in the treatment of colorectal cancer, there is still no optimal strategy for tumours located adjacent to the anal sphincter. This study aims to evaluate oncological and functional results of surgery for rectal cancer in unfavourable locations in proximity to anal sphincters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with rectal cancer, which was either initially infiltrating the anal sphincter or located in the close proximity of the sphincter, were included in the study. Patients were submitted to extralevator abdominoperineal resection (APR), intersphincteric resection, or transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Primary outcomes were perioperative data: operative time, blood loss, complications, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were pathological quality of the specimens and functional outcome 6 months after defunctioning ileostomy closure.

RESULTS

Among patients with cancer adjacent to the anal sphincter, 13 (25%) underwent APR, 14 (27%) patients were submitted to intersphincteric resection, and 25 (48%) patients were treated with the TaTME approach. Operative time was 240 (210-270 IQR) for APR, 212.5 (170-260 IQR) for intersphincteric resection, and 270 (240-330 IQR) for TaTME (p = 0.018). Perioperative morbidity was 31% for APR, 36% for intersphincteric resections, and 12% for the TaTME group (p = 0.181). Complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 92% of specimens in the TaTME group, 93% in intersphincteric resections, and 78% in the APR group (p = 0.72). Median circumferential resection margin in APR was 6 mm (4-7 IQR), in intersphincteric resections 7.5 mm (2.5-10 IQR), and in the TaTME group 4 mm (2.8-8 IQR). All patients after intersphincteric resections developed major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Four patients in the TaTME group developed minor LARS, and 21 had major LARS.

CONCLUSION

Sphincter-saving rectal resections are a feasible alternative to APR with good clinical, pathological, and oncological outcomes. Intersphincteric resections and TaTME seem to be equal in terms of clinicopathological results. The functional outcome is yet to be investigated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was retrospectively registered in Thai Clinical Trials Registry (23-07-2018, ID TCTR20180724001 ).

How to save both transverse colon and continence after extensive left colon surgery: A case report of a new procedure

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, after wide left colectomy, it is necessary to choose one of the following procedures: a definitive transverse colostomy, an ileo-rectal anastomosis or a right colo-rectal anastomosis (Deloyers procedure).

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We performed our new procedure on a 63 years-old man. After an extensive left proctocolectomy, the intestinal continuity between the transverse colon and rectum was obtained by transposition and rotation of the right colon into the pelvis. After recanalization the patient never lost the functions of the large intestine and progressively restored continence.

DISCUSSION

Saving the transverse colon and the right colon mean achieving not only continence but also a better degree of reabsorption of liquids and vitamin K and group B production in order to keep intestinal functions as similar as possible to the normal physiology.

CONCLUSION

The one-year follow-up surgical and clinical outcomes are encouraging to support the feasibility of this procedure in terms of improving the quality of life: avoiding diarrhea, incontinence and post-operative urgency.