1
|
Chandra P, Sacks GD. Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:941. [PMID: 38473303 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Chandra
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY 10010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Galli R, Siciliano T, Aust D, Korn S, Kirsche K, Baretton GB, Weitz J, Koch E, Riediger C. Label-free multiphoton microscopy enables histopathological assessment of colorectal liver metastases and supports automated classification of neoplastic tissue. Sci Rep 2023; 13:4274. [PMID: 36922643 PMCID: PMC10017791 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31401-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
As the state of resection margins is an important prognostic factor after extirpation of colorectal liver metastases, surgeons aim to obtain negative margins, sometimes elaborated by resections of the positive resection plane after intraoperative frozen sections. However, this is time consuming and results sometimes remain unclear during surgery. Label-free multimodal multiphoton microscopy (MPM) is an optical technique that retrieves morpho-chemical information avoiding all staining and that can potentially be performed in real-time. Here, we investigated colorectal liver metastases and hepatic tissue using a combination of three endogenous nonlinear signals, namely: coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) to visualize lipids, two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) to visualize cellular patterns, and second harmonic generation (SHG) to visualize collagen fibers. We acquired and analyzed over forty thousand MPM images of metastatic and normal liver tissue of 106 patients. The morphological information with biochemical specificity produced by MPM allowed discriminating normal liver from metastatic tissue and discerning the tumor borders on cryosections as well as formalin-fixed bulk tissue. Furthermore, automated tissue type classification with a correct rate close to 95% was possible using a simple approach based on discriminant analysis of texture parameters. Therefore, MPM has the potential to increase the precision of resection margins in hepatic surgery of metastases without prolonging surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Galli
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Tiziana Siciliano
- Center for Regenerative Therapies (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 105, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniela Aust
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Partner Site Dresden: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandra Korn
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katrin Kirsche
- Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo B Baretton
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Partner Site Dresden: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Partner Site Dresden: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Edmund Koch
- Clinical Sensoring and Monitoring, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carina Riediger
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Partner Site Dresden: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ai XN, Tao M, Wang HY, Li JL, Sun T, Xiu DR. Analysis of survival factors after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases: Does the R1 margin matter? Front Surg 2023; 9:1020240. [PMID: 36684119 PMCID: PMC9852629 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1020240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The effect of liver margin on colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) after hepatectomy has been controversial. In this study, we conducted a postoperative follow-up study of 205 patients with CRLM to clarify whether a positive margin is significant and to define the risk factors affecting CRLM survival. Methods The data of 205 patients with CRLM who underwent surgical treatment at the Third Hospital of Peking University in the Department of General Surgery from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The general data, surgical data and postoperative follow-up of the patients were statistically analyzed. Results There were 130 cases (63.4%) of R0 resection and 75 cases (36.6%) of R1 resection. There were 136 males and 69 females, age 61 ± 11 years, and body mass index (BMI 24.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2). The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the entire cohort were 93.4%, 68.4%, and 45.5% in the R0 resection group vs. 93.2%, 53.7%, and 42% in the R1 resection group, respectively, which were not statistically significant (P = 0.520). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates of 63.2%, 33.3%, and 29.7% were significantly better in the R0 resection group than in the R1 resection group of 47.9%, 22.7%, and 17.7% (P = 0.016), respectively. After multivariable analysis, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) > 39 U/ml (HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.39-3.79, P = 0.001), primary tumor perineural invasion (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.01-3.13, P = 0.047), and BMI > 24 kg/m2 (HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.05-2.93, P = 0.033) were independently associated with poorer overall patient survival. The number of liver metastases >2 (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.10-2.47, P = 0.016), the maximum diameter of metastases ≥50 mm (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.06-2.64, P = 0.026), and vascular invasion of the primary tumor (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.03-2.64, P = 0.038) were also independently associated with poorer disease-free survival. Conclusion In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM, the negative effect of the R1 margin should be downplayed, and although the disease-free survival of the R1 margin is shorter than that of the R0 margin, it has no impact on overall survival. To improve overall survival, extra attention should be given to the factors of preoperative BMI, preoperative CA19-9, and the presence of perineural invasion of the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang-nan Ai
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Tao
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hang-yan Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jing-lin Li
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dian-rong Xiu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China,Correspondence: Dian-rong Xiu
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Symeonidis D, Tepetes K, Tzovaras G, Kissa L, Samara AA, Bompou E, Zacharoulis D. Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted? Clin Pract 2022; 12:1102-1110. [PMID: 36547120 PMCID: PMC9777184 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract12060112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with a rather dismal 5-year overall survival. The liver is the most commonly affected organ. Improved 5-year survival rates after successful hepatic resections for metastases confined to the liver have been reported. Certainly, a hepatectomy that results in an incomplete tumor resection, in terms of leaving macroscopic residual tumor in the future liver remnant, is not associated with survival benefits. However, the prognostic implications of a microscopically positive surgical margin or a clear margin of less than 1 mm (R1) on pathology are debatable. Although it has been a field of extensive research, the relevant literature often reports contradictory results. The purpose of the present study was to define, assess the risk factors for, and, ultimately, analyze the effect that an R1 hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases might have on local recurrence rates and long-term prognosis by reviewing the relevant literature. Achieving an R0 hepatic resection, optimally with more than 1 mm of clear margin, should always be the goal. However, in the era of the aggressive multimodality treatment of liver metastatic colorectal cancer, an R1 resection might be the cost of increasing the pool of patients finally eligible for resection. The majority of literature reports have highlighted the detrimental effect of R1 resections on local recurrence and overall survival. However, there are indeed studies that degraded the prognostic handicap as a consequence of an R1 resection in selected patients and highlighted the presence of RAS mutations, the response to chemotherapy, and, in general, factors that reflect the biology of the disease as important, if not the determinant, prognostic factors. In these patients, the aggressive disease biology seems to outperform the resection margin status as a prognostic factor, and the recorded differences between R1 and R0 resections are equalized. Properly and accurately defining this patient group is a future challenge in the field of the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ahmed S, Bosma N, Moser M, Ahmed S, Brunet B, Davies J, Doll C, Dueck DA, Kim CA, Ji S, Le D, Lee-Ying R, Lim H, McGhie JP, Mulder K, Park J, Ravi D, Renouf DJ, Schellenberg D, Wong RPW, Zaidi A. Systemic Therapy and Its Surgical Implications in Patients with Resectable Liver Colorectal Cancer Metastases. A Report from the Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:1796-1807. [PMID: 35323347 PMCID: PMC8947455 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WCGCCC) convened virtually on 4 November 2021. The WCGCCC is an interactive multi-disciplinary conference attended by health care professionals, including surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists; radiologists; and allied health care professionals from across four Western Canadian provinces, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. They participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing recommendations on the role of systemic therapy and its optimal sequence in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahid Ahmed
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, 20 Campus Drive, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (B.B.); (D.-A.D.); (D.L.)
| | - Nicholas Bosma
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (N.B.); (J.D.); (H.L.); (D.J.R.)
| | - Michael Moser
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada;
| | - Shahida Ahmed
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; (S.A.); (C.A.K.); (R.P.W.W.)
| | - Bryan Brunet
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, 20 Campus Drive, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (B.B.); (D.-A.D.); (D.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
| | - Janine Davies
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (N.B.); (J.D.); (H.L.); (D.J.R.)
| | - Corinne Doll
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Service, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (C.D.); (R.L.-Y.)
| | - Dorie-Anna Dueck
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, 20 Campus Drive, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (B.B.); (D.-A.D.); (D.L.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
| | - Christina A. Kim
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; (S.A.); (C.A.K.); (R.P.W.W.)
| | - Shuying Ji
- Shared Health, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2K6, Canada;
| | - Duc Le
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, 20 Campus Drive, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (B.B.); (D.-A.D.); (D.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
| | - Richard Lee-Ying
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Service, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (C.D.); (R.L.-Y.)
| | - Howard Lim
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (N.B.); (J.D.); (H.L.); (D.J.R.)
| | | | - Karen Mulder
- Cross Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada;
| | - Jason Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada;
| | - Deepti Ravi
- Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, SK S7K 0M7, Canada;
| | - Daniel J. Renouf
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (N.B.); (J.D.); (H.L.); (D.J.R.)
| | | | - Ralph P. W. Wong
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; (S.A.); (C.A.K.); (R.P.W.W.)
| | - Adnan Zaidi
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, 20 Campus Drive, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (B.B.); (D.-A.D.); (D.L.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ausania F, Landi F, Martínez-Pérez A, Sandomenico R, Cuatrecasas M, Pages M, Maurel J, Garcia R, Fuster J, Garcia-Valdecasas JC. Impact of microscopic incomplete resection for colorectal liver metastases on surgical margin recurrence: R1-Contact vs R1 < 1 mm margin width. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:449-459. [PMID: 34995418 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies highlighted an inferior outcome of R1 resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM); it is still unclear whether directly involved margins (R1-contact) are associated with a poorer outcome compared to R1 < 1 mm. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact on surgical margin recurrence (SMR) of R1-contact vs R1 < 1 mm patients. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for CRLM between 2009-2018 with both R1 resections on final histology were included and compared in terms of recurrence and survival. Factors associated with SMR were assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Out of 477, 77 (17.2%) patients showed R1 resection (53 R1-Contact and 24 R1 < 1 mm). Overall recurrence rate was 79.2% (R1 < 1 mm = 70.8% vs R1-contact group = 83%, P = .222). Median disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were significantly higher in R1 < 1 mm vs R1-contact group (93 vs 55 months; P = .025 and 69 vs 46 months; P = .038, respectively). The SMR rate was higher in R1-contact compared to R1 < 1 mm group (30.2% vs 8.3%; P = .036). At univariate analysis, age, number of metastases, open surgical approach, RAS status, and R1-contact were associated with SMR. At multivariate analysis, R1-contact margin was the only factor independently associated with higher SMR (OR = 5.6; P = .046). CONCLUSIONS R1-contact margin is independently associated with SMR after liver resection for CRLM. Patients with R1-contact margin will also experience poorer DFS and DSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Ausania
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Filippo Landi
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Raffaele Sandomenico
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mario Pages
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rocio Garcia
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Fuster
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Universidad de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guo M, Jin N, Pawlik T, Cloyd JM. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: A contemporary review of the literature. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:1043-1061. [PMID: 34616511 PMCID: PMC8465453 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i9.1043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and up to 50% of patients with CRC develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). For these patients, surgical resection remains the only opportunity for cure and long-term survival. Over the past few decades, outcomes of patients with metastatic CRC have improved significantly due to advances in systemic therapy, as well as improvements in operative technique and perioperative care. Chemotherapy in the modern era of oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-containing regimens has been augmented by the introduction of targeted biologics and immunotherapeutic agents. The increasing efficacy of contemporary systemic therapies has led to an expansion in the proportion of patients eligible for curative-intent surgery. Consequently, the use of neoadjuvant strategies is becoming progressively more established. For patients with CRLM, the primary advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is the potential to down-stage metastatic disease in order to facilitate hepatic resection. On the other hand, the routine use of NCT for patients with resectable metastases remains controversial, especially given the potential risk of inducing chemotherapy-associated liver injury prior to hepatectomy. Current guidelines recommend upfront surgery in patients with initially resectable disease and low operative risk, reserving NCT for patients with borderline resectable or unresectable disease and high operative risk. Patients undergoing NCT require close monitoring for tumor response and conversion of CRLM to resectability. In light of the growing number of treatment options available to patients with metastatic CRC, it is generally agreed that these patients are best served at tertiary centers with an expert multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Guo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Ning Jin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Timothy Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chavez MI, Gholami S, Kim BJ, Margonis GA, Ethun CG, Tsai S, Christians KK, Clarke C, Mogal H, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM, D'Angelica MI, Aloia TA, Eastwood D, Gamblin TC. Two-Stage Hepatectomy for Bilateral Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multi-institutional Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:1457-1465. [PMID: 33393036 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09459-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) is an important tool in the management of bilateral colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study sought to examine the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients completing TSH in major hepatobiliary centers in the United States (US). METHODS A retrospective review from five liver centers in the US identified patients who completed a TSH procedure for bilateral CRLM. RESULTS From December 2000 to March 2016, a total of 196 patients were identified. The majority of procedures were performed using an open technique (n = 194, 99.5%). The median number of tumors was 7 (range 2-33). One-hundred and twenty-eight (65.3%) patients underwent portal vein embolization. More patients received chemotherapy prior to the first stage than chemotherapy administration preceding the second stage (92% vs. 60%, p = 0.308). Median overall survival (OS) was 50 months, with a median follow-up of 28 months (range 2-143). Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy was administered to 64 (32.7%) patients with similar OS as those managed without an infusion pump (p = 0.848). Postoperative morbidity following the second-stage resection was 47.4%. Chemotherapy prior to the second stage did not demonstrate an increased complication rate (p = 0.202). Readmission following the second stage was 10.3% and was associated with a decrease in disease-free survival (p = 0.003). OS was significantly decreased by positive resection margins and increased estimated blood loss (EBL; p = 0.036 and p = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION This is the largest TSH series in the US and demonstrates evidence of safety and feasibility in the management of bilateral CRLM. Outcomes are influenced by margin status and operative EBL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana I Chavez
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Susan Tsai
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Callisia Clarke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Harveshp Mogal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Timothy M Pawlik
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel Eastwood
- Division of Biostatistics at Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - T Clark Gamblin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Burlaka AA, Paliichuk AV, Iatsyna OI, Kolesnik ОО. Colorectal cancer liver metastases within the central and peripheral segments: Parenchymal sparing surgery adaptation. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020; 58:8-13. [PMID: 32874570 PMCID: PMC7452121 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The debate over the surgical strategy optimization in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases (mCRC) has been ongoing in the last 20 years. However, parenchyma sparing surgery (PPS) in cases of hard to reach liver cites (HTRLC) remain to be controversial. Methods A prospective analysis of 185 mCRC patients performed who were devided in two groups depending by predominant liver cite localization. Peripherally localized metastases (PLM) (n = 107) (S2, S3, S6, S7, Spiegel lobe and subcapsular area 1-2 cm below the liver surface). Group 2 included those with metastases localized in HTRLC (n = 78) - metastatic lesions of the "right venous core", portal and caval hilum, paracaval part of S1, "deep" parenchyma cites of S5, S8 and S4. Results In 26 (33,3%) and 32 (29,9%) patients of HTRLC and PLM, respectively, performed one liver re-resection (0,62). In HTRLC group 2 and more re-resection were performed in 7 (8,9%) cases while in PLM in 11 (10,3%), p = 0,76. Postoperative major morbidity was 24,4%, 21,8% (p = 0,15) and mortality 8,9%, 4,6% for HTRLC and PLM groups, respectively. R1v principles were implemented in 24 (30,7%) cases with centrally located metastases and in only 6 cases (5.6%) with peripheral localized metastases (p = 0,001). Cumulative 3-year disease-free survival (DSF) for PLM and HTRLC groups was 63% and 41% (p = 0,008). DFS for R1v (n = 24) and R0 (54) cochorts in HTRLC group was 33% and 43%, respeсtively (p = 0,44). Conclusions Principles of the PPS tactic provides an adequate removal of metastatic lesions in hard to reach liver cites allowing to maintain organ functions and increases the feasibility of the repeated liver resections in case of the initial disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Burlaka
- Colorectal Cancer Department of National Cancer Institute, Ukraine
| | | | - O I Iatsyna
- Medical Director of National Cancer Institute, Ukraine
| | - О О Kolesnik
- Main Researcher of Colorectal Cancer Department of National Cancer Institute, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lai H, Zhang J, Zuo H, Liu H, Xu J, Feng Y, Lin Y, Mo X. Overexpression of miR-17 is correlated with liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19265. [PMID: 32118734 PMCID: PMC7478658 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men and women. The presence of systemic disease, with metastatic spread to distant sites such as the liver, considerably reduces the survival rate in CRC. Cancer stem cells contribute to the metastatic potential of CRC. However, the mechanism underlying metastasis in CRC remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to examine the expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) in CRC stem cells in cases of liver metastases and assess their correlation with clinicopathological features. METHODS miRNAs showing high expression in liver metastases and primary lesions were selected through data mining of gene expression omnibus datasets, and miRNAs characteristic of stem cells were selected through COREMINE medical text mining. Subsequently, paired formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples of primary CRC and liver metastasis from 30 patients were examined for the expression of miRNAs common to these lists (hsa-miR-20a, hsa-miR-26b, hsa-miR-146a, hsa-miR-17, hsa-miR-451, hsa-miR-23a, and hsa-miR-29a) using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Further, miRNA expression was compared between liver metastases and the primary tumor in each patient and the factors associated with differential expression were analyzed. RESULTS hsa-miR-17 was significantly upregulated in liver metastases (P < .05), but no significant difference in the expression of hsa-miR-26b, hsa-miR-146a, hsa-miR-451, hsa-miR-23a, and hsa-miR-29a was observed between primary tumors and liver metastases. The higher expression of hsa-miR-17 in liver metastases was associated with the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and tumor differentiation (P < .05) but was not associated with age, sex, tumor location, or lymphatic metastasis. CONCLUSIONS High expression of miR-17 may contribute to liver metastasis in CRC. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of its downstream pathways could help in elucidating the mechanisms underlying liver metastases in CRC. However, additional studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Lai
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer
| | - Jie Zhang
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer
| | - Hongqun Zuo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer
| | - Haizhou Liu
- Research Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P.R. China
| | - Jing Xu
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer
| | - Yan Feng
- Research Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P.R. China
| | - Yuan Lin
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer
| | - Xianwei Mo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Proposal of Two Prognostic Models for the Prediction of 10-Year Survival after Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases. HPB SURGERY : A WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATIC, PANCREATIC AND BILIARY SURGERY 2018; 2018:5618581. [PMID: 30420795 PMCID: PMC6215566 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5618581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background One-third of 5-year survivors after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) develop recurrence or tumor-related death. Therefore 10-year survival appears more adequate in defining permanent cure. The aim of this study was to develop prognostic models for the prediction of 10-year survival after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Methods N=965 cases of liver resection for CLM were retrospectively analyzed using univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Receiver operating curve analyses were used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of developed prognostic models and their potential clinical usefulness. Results The 10-year survival rate was 15.2%. Age at liver resection, application of chemotherapies of the primary tumor, preoperative Quick's value, hemoglobin level, and grading of the primary colorectal tumor were independent significant predictors for 10-year patient survival. The generated formula to predict 10-year survival based on these preoperative factors displayed an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.716. In regard to perioperative variables, the distance of resection margins and performance of right segmental liver resection were additional independent predictors for 10-year survival. The logit link formula generated with pre- and perioperative variables showed an AUROC of 0.761. Conclusion Both prognostic models are potentially clinically useful (AUROCs >0.700) for the prediction of 10-year survival. External validation is required prior to the introduction of these models in clinical patient counselling.
Collapse
|