Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection (DP-CAR) for Pancreatic Cancer. How I do It

Periarterial divestment following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer with celiac axis invasion: A safe and effective surgical procedure

BACKGROUND

Modern pancreatic surgery has gradually changed with the introduction of neoadjuvant therapy. For patients with pancreatic cancer involving peripancreatic visceral arteries who have received neoadjuvant therapy, periarterial divestment has gradually gained popularity, which represents an alternative to arterial resection. There is ongoing debate about whether this approach achieves curative tumor resection comparable to that of arterial resection, and the differences in terms of postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes between the 2 surgical procedures.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative and survival outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients with celiac axis invasion who underwent distal pancreatectomy in our center from December 2016 to March 2023.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy as a priority after diagnosis, among whom 42.1% (n = 40) underwent distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis periarterial divestment, whereas 57.9% (n = 55) underwent distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis periarterial divestment showed lower rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, intraabdominal infection, and postoperative hepatic ischemia compared with distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection, with no significant differences in R0 resection rate, postoperative tumor recurrence, and survival. Furthermore, 46 patients diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer involving the celiac axis underwent upfront surgery of distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection without neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy patients exhibited significant advantages in terms of tumor pathologic outcomes and survival compared with those undergoing upfront surgery of distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection.

CONCLUSION

After neoadjuvant therapy, distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis periarterial divestment in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients with celiac axis invasion is deemed safe and feasible on the basis of adequate imaging evaluation combined with intraoperative judgment of the surgeons. This technique is recommended to be performed at high-volume pancreatic centers by experienced surgeons.

Embolize, supercharge, resect: Embolization to enhance hepatic vascularization prior to en-bloc pancreas and arterial resection

INTRODUCTION

Embolization could increase the resectability of pancreatic tumors by supercharging visceral arterial perfusion prior to pancreatic surgery with arterial en-bloc resection. Its indications, however, are controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the results of a single-center database of patients undergoing pancreatic surgery with arterial resection (AR) after preoperative arterial embolization (PAE) to increase hepatic vascular flow and spare arterial reconstruction.

RESULTS

PAE was planned in 15 patients with arterial involvement due to pancreatic tumors. Three patients were excluded due to the finding of irresectable disease during surgery. Twelve cases were resected because of pancreatic cancer (10), distal cholangiocarcinoma (1), and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (1). Arterial involvement in these cases required embolization of the substitute right hepatic artery (RHA) (5), left hepatic artery (1), and common hepatic artery (CHA) (6) to enhance liver vascularization. Two patients presented migration of the vascular plug after PAE. Six pancreatoduodenectomies and 6 distal pancreatectomies were performed, the latter associated with en-bloc celiac trunk and CHA resection. R0 was achieved in 7 out of 12 patients, and pathological vascular involvement was confirmed in 8. Postoperative complications included one patient who developed gastric ischemia and underwent gastrectomy, and one patient who underwent reoperation for acute cholecystitis with liver abscesses.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative arterial embolization before pancreatic surgery with hepatic arterial resection enables surgeons to precondition hepatic vascularization and prevent hepatic ischemia. In addition, this avoids having to perform arterial anastomosis in the presence of pancreatic suture.

Minimally invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an entropy balancing analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of minimally invasive radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (MI-RAMPS) remain to be established in pancreatic cancer (PDAC) METHODS: Eighty-five open (O)-RAMPS were compared to 93 MI-RAMPS. The entropy balance matching approach was used to compare the two cohorts, eliminating the selection bias. Three models were created. Model 1 made O-RAMPS equal to the MI-RAMPS cohort (i.e., compared the two procedures for resectable PDAC); model 2 made MI-RAMPS equal to O-RAMPS (i.e., compared the two procedures for borderline-resectable PDAC); model 3, compared robotic and laparoscopic RAMPS.

RESULTS

O-RAMPS and MI-RAMPS showed "non-small" differences for BMI, comorbidity, back pain, tumor size, vascular resection, anterior or posterior RAMPS, multi-visceral resection, stump management, grading, and neoadjuvant therapy. Before reweighting, O-RAMPS had fewer clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulae (CR-POPF) (20.0% vs. 40.9%; p = 0.003), while MI-RAMPS had a higher mean of lymph nodes (25.7 vs. 31.7; p = 0.011). In model 1, MI-RAMPS and O-RAMPS achieved similar results. In model 2, O-RAMPS was associated with lower comprehensive complication index scores (MD = 11.2; p = 0.038), and CR-POPF rates (OR = 0.2; p = 0.001). In model 3, robotic-RAMPS had a higher probability of negative resection margins.

CONCLUSION

In patients with anatomically resectable PDAC, MI-RAMPS is feasible and as safe as O-RAMPS.

Distal Pancreatectomy With En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection (DP-CAR) for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Safe and Effective Procedure

OBJECTIVE

To determine perioperative and oncologic outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac axis (DP-CAR).

BACKGROUND

DP-CAR can be used in a selective group of patients to resect locally advanced pancreatic cancer involving the celiac axis or common hepatic artery without arterial reconstruction by preserving retrograde blood flow via the gastroduodenal artery to the liver and stomach.

METHODS

We analyzed all consecutive patients who had undergone DP-CAR between May 2003 and April 2022 at a tertiary hospital specialized in pancreatic surgery and present one of the largest single-center studies.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients underwent DP-CAR. Additional venous resection (VR) of the mesenterico-portal axis was performed in 31 patients (44%) and multivisceral resection (MVR) in 42 patients (59%). Margin-free (R0) resection was achieved in 40 patients (56%). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 8.4% for the entire patient cohort. After a cumulated experience of 16 cases, the 90-day mortality dropped to 3.6% in the following 55 patients. Extended procedures with (+) additional MVR with or without (+/-) VR resulted in higher major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIB; standard DP-CAR: 19%; DP-CAR + MVR +/- VR: 36%) and higher 90-day mortality (standard DP-CAR: 0%; DP-CAR + MVR +/- VR: 11%). Median overall survival after DP-CAR was 28 months.

CONCLUSIONS

DP-CAR is a safe and effective procedure but requires experience. Frequently, surgical resection has to be extended with MVR and VR to accomplish tumor resection, which results in promising oncologic outcomes. However, extended resections were associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Modified Appleby procedure for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A primer for the radiologist

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most prevalent pancreatic neoplasm accounting for more than 90% of pancreatic malignancies. Surgical resection with adequate lymphadenectomy remains the only available curative strategy for patients with PDAC. Despite improvements in both chemotherapy regimen and surgical care, body/neck PDAC still conveys a poor prognosis because of the vicinity of major vascular structures, including celiac trunk, which favors insidious disease spread at the time of diagnosis. Body/neck PDAC involving the celiac trunk is considered locally advanced PDAC in most guidelines and therefore not eligible for upfront resection. However, a more aggressive surgical approach (i.e., distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and en-bloc celiac trunk resection [DP-CAR]) was recently proposed to offer hope for cure in selected patients with locally advanced body/neck PDAC responsive to induction therapy at the cost of higher morbidity. The so-called "modified Appleby procedure" is highly demanding and requires optimal preoperative staging as well as appropriate patient preparation for surgery (i.e., preoperative arterial embolization). Herein, we review current evidence regarding DP-CAR indications and outcomes as well as the critical role of diagnostic and interventional radiology in patient preparation before DP-CAR, and early identification and management of DP-CAR complications.

"Conversion surgery" for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A position paper by the study group at the joint meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) & Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) 2022

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), which progresses locally and surrounds major vessels, has historically been deemed unresectable. Surgery alone failed to provide curative resection and improve overall survival. With the advancements in treatment, reports have shown favorable results in LAPC after undergoing successful chemotherapy therapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by surgical resection, so-called "conversion surgery", at experienced high-volume centers. However, recognizing significant regional and institutional disparities in the management of LAPC, an international consensus meeting on conversion surgery for LAPC was held during the Joint Congress of the 26th Meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the 53rd Annual Meeting of Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) in Kyoto in July 2022. During the meeting, presenters reported the current best multidisciplinary practices for LAPC, including preoperative modalities, best systemic treatment regimens and durations, procedures of conversion surgery with or without vascular resections, biomarkers, and genetic studies. It was unanimously agreed among the experts in this meeting that "cancer biology is surpassing locoregional anatomical resectability" in the era of effective multiagent treatment. The biology of pancreatic cancer has yet to be further elucidated, and we believe it is essential to improve the treatment outcomes of LAPC patients through continued efforts from each institution and more international collaboration. This article summarizes the agreement during the discussion amongst the experts in the meeting. We hope that this will serve as a foundation for future international collaboration and recommendations for future guidelines.

A more radical perspective on surgical approach and outcomes in pancreatic cancer-a narrative review

Background and Objective

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a dismal disease and is expected to become an even greater burden in the near future. This review focuses on the different surgical aspects for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), distal and total pancreatectomy (TP), incorporating lessons from both the western and eastern visions in treating pancreatic cancer.

Methods

We conducted an extensive literature review through PubMed, prioritizing papers published in the last 5 years, but older emblematic papers were also included. We included articles that explored the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with focus on the surgical aspect and strategies to improve outcomes. References of selected articles were also reviewed to identify any missed studies. Only papers in English were included.

Key Content and Findings

As evidence continues to build, it is clear that both systemic and surgical therapies have a fundamental and complementary role. State of art surgical treatment encompasses complete mesopancreas excision for radical lymphadenectomy. Preoperative planning of dissection planes, extensive knowledge of vascular anatomic variations, oncological principles and expertise for vascular resections are mandatory to perform a more radical operation, in pursuit of improved outcomes.

Conclusions

Based on current data, patient selection remains key and a more radical surgical approach brings more accomplishing results bringing as to believe that more is better.

Distal pancreatectomy with or without radical approach, vascular resections and splenectomy: Easier does not always mean easy

Because distal pancreatectomy (DP) has no reconstructive steps and less frequent vascular involvement, it is thought to be the easier counterpart of pancreaticoduodenectomy. This procedure has a high surgical risk and the overall incidences of perioperative morbidity (mainly pancreatic fistula), and mortality are still high, in addition to the challenges that accompany delayed access to adjuvant therapies (if any) and prolonged impairment of daily activities. Moreover, surgery to remove malignancy of the body or tail of the pancreas is associated with poor long-term oncological outcomes. From this perspective, new surgical approaches, and aggressive techniques, such as radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy and DP with celiac axis resection, could lead to improved survival in those affected by more locally advanced tumors. Conversely, minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopic and robotic surgeries and the avoidance of routine concomitant splenectomy have been developed to reduce the burden of surgical stress. The purpose of ongoing surgical research has been to achieve significant reductions in perioperative complications, length of hospital stays and the time between surgery and the beginning of adjuvant chemotherapy. Because a dedicated multidisciplinary team is crucial to pancreatic surgery, hospital and surgeon volumes have been confirmed to be associated with better outcomes in patients affected by benign, borderline, and malignant diseases of the pancreas. The purpose of this review is to examine the state of the art in distal pancreatectomies, with a special focus on minimally invasive approaches and oncological-directed techniques. The widespread reproducibility, cost-effectiveness and long-term results of each oncological procedure are also taken into deep consideration.

Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are best treated with surgical resection of the primary tumour and systemic chemotherapy, which provides considerably longer overall survival (OS) durations than either modality alone. Regardless, most patients will have disease relapse owing to micrometastatic disease. Although currently a matter of some debate, considerable research interest has been focused on the role of neoadjuvant therapy for all forms of resectable PDAC. Whilst adjuvant combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to improve OS without necessarily increasing the resection rate in those with borderline-resectable disease. Furthermore, around 20% of patients with unresectable non-metastatic PDAC might undergo resection following 4-6 months of induction combination chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy, even in the absence of a clear radiological response, leading to improved OS outcomes in this group. Distinct molecular and biological responses to different types of therapies need to be better understood in order to enable the optimal sequencing of specific treatment modalities to further improve OS. In this Review, we describe current treatment strategies for the various clinical stages of PDAC and discuss developments that are likely to determine the optimal sequence of multimodality therapies by integrating the fundamental clinical and molecular features of the cancer.

Preoperative liver arterial conditioning in patients scheduled for a Mayo Clinic class Ia distal pancreatectomy: embolization or ligation?

BACKGROUND

Liver ischemia may occur during intraoperative common hepatic artery ligation in Mayo Clinic class I distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR). Preoperative liver arterial conditioning could be used to avoid this outcome. This retrospective study compared arterial embolization (AE) or laparoscopic ligation (LL) of the common hepatic artery before class Ia DP-CAR.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2022, 18 patients were scheduled for class Ia DP-CAR after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment. Two were excluded due to hepatic artery variation, six underwent AE, ten underwent LL.

RESULTS

Two procedural complications occurred in the AE group: an incomplete dissection of the proper hepatic artery and a distal migration of coils in the right branch of the hepatic artery. Neither complication prevented surgery. The median delay between conditioning and DP-CAR was 19 days; decreased to five days in the last six patients. None required arterial reconstruction. Morbidity and 90-day mortality rates were 26.7% and 12.5%, respectively. No patient developed postoperative liver insufficiency after LL.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative AE and LL seem comparable in averting arterial reconstruction and postoperative liver insufficiency in patients scheduled for class Ia DP-CAR. However, serious complications that may arise during AE led us to prefer the LL technique.

Preoperative hepatic artery embolization before distal pancreatectomy plus celiac axis resection does not improve surgical results: A Spanish multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) is a surgical procedure with high morbidity and mortality performed in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Preoperative embolization of hepatic artery (PHAE) has been postulated as a technical option to increase resection rate.

OBJECTIVE

comparison of morbidity and mortality at 90 days, operative time, hospital stay and survival between patients that performed DP-CAR with and without PHAE.

METHODS

Observational retrospective multicentre study.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

patient operated in Spanish centers with DP-CAR for pancreatic cancer from April 2004 until 23 June 2018. Preoperative (PHAE, neodjuvant treatment), intraoperative (operative time and blood loss) and postoperative data (morbidity, hospital stay, R0 and survival) were studied. Complications were measured with Clavien classification at 90 days. Specific pancreatic complications were measured using ISGPS classifications. Data were analyzed using R version 3.1.3 (http://www.r-project.org). Level of significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

41 patients were studied. 26 patients were not embolized (NO-PHAE group) and 15 patients received PHAE. Preoperative BMI and percentage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the only preoperative variables different between both groups. The operative time in the PHAE group was shorter (343 min) than in the non-PHAE group (411 min) (p < 0.06). Major morbidity (Clavien > IIIa) and mortality at 90 days were higher in the PHAE group than in the non-PHAE group (60% vs 23% and 26.6% vs 11.6% respectively) (p < 0.004). No statistical difference in overall survival was observed between both groups (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

In our study PHAE is not related with less postoperative morbidity. Even more, major morbidity (Clavien III-IV) and mortality was higher in PHAE group.

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and vascular resections in the era of neoadjuvant therapy

While pancreatic cancer is still characterized by early systemic spread and poor outcomes, the treatment of this disease has changed significantly in recent years due to major advancements in systemic therapy and advanced surgical techniques. Broader use of effective neoadjuvant approaches combined with aggressive surgical operations within a multidisciplinary setting has improved outcomes. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is characterized by tumor vascular invasion, and is a setting where the combination of potent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and aggressive surgical methods, including vascular resections and reconstructions, shows its full potential. Hopefully, this will lead to improved local control and curative treatment in a number of patients with this aggressive malignancy.

State of the art robotic distal pancreatectomy: a review of the literature

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy has become increasingly used in practice. While laparoscopic approach is the most commonly used technique, robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) has emerged as a safe, feasible and effective approach for distal pancreatectomy. Most studies have shown that RDP improved perioperative surgical outcomes and has equivalent oncologic outcomes to open technique. Widespread adoption is limited by a steep learning curve, higher costs and the need for institutional training protocols in place for safe integration of the platform into practice.

Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The literature is conflicting regarding the feasibility and survival outcomes of distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR), although this procedure, in selected cases, represents the only therapeutical option for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The available studies often include small surgical populations, and there are important variations in the inclusion criteria and pre- and post-operative treatment. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the literature of the last 15 years, to evaluate the efficacy and the clinical safety of this procedure. This could help physicians in the choice of a multidisciplinary targeted therapeutical plan for patients. The combination of neoadjuvant chemo/radiochemotherapy and demolitive surgeries such as DP-CAR could have a role in changing the survival outcomes of patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Abstract

Background: Major vascular invasion represents one of the most frequent reasons to consider pancreatic adenocarcinomas unresectable, although in the last decades, demolitive surgeries such as distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) have become a therapeutical option. Methods: A meta-analysis of studies comparing DP-CAR and standard DP in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma was conducted. Moreover, a systematic review of studies analyzing oncological, postoperative and survival outcomes of DP-CAR was conducted. Results: Twenty-four articles were selected for the systematic review, whereas eleven were selected for the meta-analysis, for a total of 1077 patients. Survival outcomes between the two groups were similar in terms of 1 year overall survival (OS) (odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 1.31, p = 0.24). Patients who received DP-CAR were more likely to have T4 tumors (OR 28.45, 95% CI 10.46 to 77.37, p < 0.00001) and positive margins (R+) (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.17, p = 0.008). Overall complications (OR, 1.72, 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.58, p = 0.008) were more frequent in the DP-CAR group, whereas rates of pancreatic fistula (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.65, p = 0.41) were similar. Conclusions: DP-CAR was not associated with higher mortality compared to standard DP; however, overall morbidity was higher. Celiac axis involvement should no longer be considered a strict contraindication to surgery in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Considering the different baseline tumor characteristics, DP-CAR may need to be compared with palliative therapies instead of standard DP.

Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection-with Posterior Ramps Approach-for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Celiac Trunk Infiltration (Modified Appleby Procedure) (with Video)

With the advent of FOLFIRINOX and neoadjuvant radiotherapy, the surgical indications for adenocarcinoma have expanded. Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas of the body/tail with infiltration of the celiac trunk which have a good clinical, biological, and radiological response to neoadjuvant treatment may therefore be eligible for caudal pancreatectomy with resection of the celiac trunk (modified Appleby procedure). In addition to rigorous patient selection and surgical expertise, this procedure also requires experience in interventional radiology.

Sub-adventitial divestment technique for resecting artery-involved pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To introduce sub-adventitial divestment technique (SDT), a procedure to remove the tumor while preserving the artery during curative pancreatectomy. Peri-operative safety profile was also evaluated.

METHODS

In a single center consecutive series of pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, the outcome of patients who had pancreatectomy with SDT was compared to standard pancreatic surgery.

RESULTS

From June 2014 to June 2016, 72 patients had pancreatectomy with SDT and 235 had standard surgery. Tumor stage was T4 in all 72 (100%) tumors removed using SDT compared to four (2%) with standard pancreatectomy (p < 0.001). All 72 (100%) tumors in the SDT group were stage III compared to 24 (10%) in the standard surgery group (p < 0.001). Both groups had a high proportion of poorly differentiated tumors (52 (72%) and 163 (69%) respectively) and perineural tumor invasion (62 (86%) and 186 (79%) respectively). R1 (< 1 mm) was found in 24 (86%) of 28 tumors in the SDT group, and in 72 (60%) out of 120 standard pancreatectomy tumors (p = 0.01). Complications occurred in 29 (40%) of the SDT group and in 88 (37%) of the standard group. The in-hospital mortality was four (6%) in the SDT group and one (0.4%) in the standard group (p = 0.01), with a 90-day mortality of 5 (8%)/60 and 6 (3%)/209 (p = 0.07) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The sub-adventitial divestment technique appeared to be an effective surgical technique to remove the tumor while preserving the artery. This approach warrants further validation in prospective studies.

Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes in consecutive patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter prospective cohort

INTRODUCTION

Since current studies on locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) mainly report from single, high-volume centers, it is unclear if outcomes can be translated to daily clinical practice. This study provides treatment strategies and clinical outcomes within a multicenter cohort of unselected patients with LAPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with LAPC according to Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group criteria, were prospectively included in 14 centers from April 2015 until December 2017. A centralized expert panel reviewed response according to RECIST v1.1 and potential surgical resectability. Primary outcome was median overall survival (mOS), stratified for primary treatment strategy.

RESULTS

Overall, 422 patients were included, of whom 77% (n = 326) received chemotherapy. The majority started with FOLFIRINOX (77%, 252/326) with a median of six cycles (IQR 4-10). Gemcitabine monotherapy was given to 13% (41/326) of patients and nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine to 10% (33/326), with a median of two (IQR 3-5) and three (IQR 3-5) cycles respectively. The mOS of the entire cohort was 10 months (95%CI 9-11). In patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine monotherapy, or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, mOS was 14 (95%CI 13-15), 9 (95%CI 8-10), and 9 months (95%CI 8-10), respectively. A resection was performed in 13% (32/252) of patients after FOLFIRINOX, resulting in a mOS of 23 months (95%CI 12-34).

CONCLUSION

This multicenter unselected cohort of patients with LAPC resulted in a 14 month mOS and a 13% resection rate after FOLFIRINOX. These data put previous results in perspective, enable us to inform patients with more accurate survival numbers and will support decision-making in clinical practice.

Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR): Optimal perioperative outcome in a patient with locally advanced pancreas adenocarcinoma

•

DP-CAR: A rare, technically demanding operation with significant morbidity & mortality.

•

DP-CAR may provide curative (R0) resection of an otherwise unresectable cancer.

•

Our patient had optimal perioperative outcome and excellent histology result.

•

To the best of our knowledge this is the first DP-CAR case in Greece.

Introduction

Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) is an operation technically demanding, uncommonly performed, even in high-volume pancreatic centers, which may offer a curative resection in patients with locally advanced cancer of the body of the pancreas, otherwise considered unresectable.

Presentation of case

We present, in clinical and technical detail, a patient with DP-CAR with a very good intraoperative and postoperative course, no complications, short hospital stay, and histology consistent with a curative resection.

Discussion

Because of the scarcity of DP-CAR, even high-volume individual centers have been able to gather relatively limited experience, and only in a time frame of more than a decade each.

Conclusion

DP-CAR can be curative for a minority of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and is performed only in centers with a long, dedicated interest in advanced pancreatic surgery with a well-known track record in resection of borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer involving major peripancreatic veins.

Perioperative CT angiography assessment of locally advanced distal pancreatic carcinoma to evaluate feasibility of the modified Appleby procedure

PURPOSE

To study the perioperative CT angiography (CTA) findings of modified Appleby procedure candidates for the surgical feasibility in patients with locally advanced distal pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and to assess CTA performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated CTA of patients with distal LAPC who underwent modified Appleby procedure between March 2004 and October 2017. Preoperative CT scans performed within up to three months prior to the surgery and postoperative scans, at least one of which was within one month of surgery, were reviewed. Data was collected reporting tumor size, relation to vessels, changes from neoadjuvant chemoradiation, modifications to the surgery and complications. The CTA findings were correlated with operative notes and surgical pathology. Statistical analysis was performed using binary classification method to evaluate CTA performance.

RESULTS

Consecutive 20 patients underwent modified Appleby procedure in the study period. In 18/20 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, mean pancreatic mass size significantly reduced from 4.58 + 1.17 cm to 3.55 + 0.84 cm (p = 0.002). The celiac axis (CA) was encased in all, whereas none of the patients had encasement of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or involvement of gastroduodenal artery (GDA). The CTA had 88.89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 90% accuracy for evaluating the arterial involvement.

CONCLUSION

Distal LAPC patients, in particular those who have significant size reduction after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, with encasement of CA and without encasement of SMA and GDA can undergo a technically successful modified Appleby procedure. CTA offers accurate and valuable perioperative assessment of the surgical candidates.

Factors predicting survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy with arterial resection

Pancreatectomy with arterial resection is a treatment option in selected patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to identify factors predicting cancer-specific survival in this patient population. A single-Institution prospective database was used. Pre-operative prognostic factors were identified and used to develop a prognostic score. Matching with pathologic parameters was used for internal validation. In a patient population with a median Ca 19.9 level of 19.8 U/mL(IQR: 7.1–77), cancer-specific survival was predicted by: metabolic deterioration of diabetes (OR = 0.22, p = 0.0012), platelet count (OR = 1.00; p = 0.0013), serum level of Ca 15.3 (OR = 1.01, p = 0.0018) and Ca 125 (OR = 1.02, p = 0.00000137), neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (OR = 1.16; p = 0.00015), lymphocytes-to-monocytes ratio (OR = 0.88; p = 0.00233), platelets-to-lymphocytes ratio (OR = 0.99; p = 0.00118), and FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 0.57; p = 0.00144). A prognostic score was developed and three risk groups were identified. Harrell’s C-Index was 0.74. Median cancer-specific survival was 16.0 months (IQR: 12.3–28.2) for the high-risk group, 24.7 months (IQR: 17.6–33.4) for the intermediate-risk group, and 39.0 months (IQR: 22.7–NA) for the low-risk group (p = 0.0003). Matching the three risk groups against pathology parameters, N2 rate was 61.9, 42.1, and 23.8% (p = 0.04), median value of lymph-node ratio was 0.07 (IQR: 0.05–0.14), 0.04 (IQR:0.02–0.07), and 0.03 (IQR: 0.01–0.04) (p = 0.008), and mean value of logarithm odds of positive nodes was − 1.07 ± 0.5, − 1.3 ± 0.4, and − 1.4 ± 0.4 (p = 0.03), in the high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk groups, respectively. An online calculator is available at www.survivalcalculator-lapdac-arterialresection.org. The prognostic factors identified in this study predict cancer-specific survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and low Ca 19.9 levels undergoing pancreatectomy with arterial resection.

Borderline or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A single center experience on the FOLFIRINOX induction regimen

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine the impact of FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant therapy on patients with non-metastatic borderline/locally advanced (BL/LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), in current practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 2010 to 2017, 258 patients with BL/LA PDAC from a single high-volume institution received FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

The 258 patients received a median number of 6 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (range, 3-16); 98 (38%) patients underwent curative surgery, and 160 (62%) continued medical treatment. A venous resection was performed in 57 patients (58%), and an arterial resection in 12 (12%). The postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 6.1% and 8.2%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 57 patients (59%). The median overall survival (OS) in patients who did (n = 98) or did not (n = 160) undergo surgical resection were 39 months and 19 months, respectively (P < 0.001). In resected patients, the ASA 3 score (P < 0.01), venous resection (P < 0.01), hemorrhage (P < 0.01), and R1 margin status (P = 0.03) were found to negatively influence the OS. The median OS was significantly higher in patients who did not require a venous resection (not reached vs. 26.5 months, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX provided a survival benefit in BL/LA PDAC patients, particularly in those who did not ultimately require venous resection.

Robotic Pancreatic Surgery for Solid, Cystic, and Mixed Lesions

Robotic surgery is flourishing worldwide. Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Most pancreatic operations are undertaken for the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Therefore, it is essential for all physicians caring for patients with cancer to understand the role and importance of molecular tumor markers. This article details our technique and application of the robotic platform to robotic pancreatectomy. The use of the robot does not change the nature of pancreatic operations, but it is our belief that it will improve patient outcomes and, possibly, survival by reducing perioperative complications.

Impact of structured report on the quality of preoperative CT staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: assessment of intra- and inter-reader variability

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a structured radiology report improves the completeness of preoperative CT staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) compared to conventional free-text reports.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 27 patients (mean age, 64 ± 11.1 years) referred for pancreatic preoperative CT scan for staging of PDA between 2015 and 2018 and in whom a diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma was ultimately confirmed. Four readers independently reported CT scans with both conventional free-text and structured reports. Differences in reported morphologic and vascular features with the two reports were assessed through McNemar Test. Intra-reader and inter-reader were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 216 reports were completed by four different readers including 108 free-text and 108 structured reports. Overall, 139 of 540 morphologic characteristics of PDA and 869 of 1188 vascular key features were only described in structured reports. Encasement of left gastric artery, gastroduodenal artery and splenic artery was described in up to 14.8% using free-text reports and in up to 29.6% using structured report, resulting in low-intra-reader agreement (k = 0.033-0.216). Inter-reader agreement improved with structured report compared to free-text one for left gastric artery (ICC = 0.844 vs. ICC = 0.493, respectively), gastroduodenal artery (ICC = 0.730 vs. ICC = 0.449, respectively), portal vein (ICC = 0.847 vs. ICC = 0.638, respectively), portal confluence (ICC = 0.848 vs. ICC = 0.422, respectively) superior mesenteric vein (ICC = 0.765 vs. ICC = 0.695, respectively), and splenic vein (ICC = 0.921 vs. ICC = 0.841, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Structured reports for PDA staging significantly reduces the number of missing morphological and vascular features of PDA and improves the inter-reader agreement compared to free-text reports.

[Pure laparoscopic DP-CAR procedure with portal vein resection]

OBJECTIVE

To improve short- and long-term outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic body-tail cancer followed by major vessels invasion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A case report of pure laparoscopic DP-CAR procedure with portal vein resection for locally advanced pancreatic body-tail cancer followed by severe abdominal pain in a 49-year-old patient is presented.

RESULTS

Liver or stomach ischemia was not observed. Portal wall resection wasn't associated with any complication and resulted R0-resection. Postoperative period was complicated by Grade B pancreatic fistula. Preoperative abdominal pain completely disappeared after surgery. Surgery time was 330 min, intraoperative blood loss - 300 ml. The patient is currently undergoing FOLFIRINOX adjuvant chemotherapy. CT in 90 days after surgery confirmed no progression of disease or liver/stomach blood supply congestion.

CONCLUSION

Modern technologies provide the opportunity to perform pure laparoscopic advanced surgical procedures with major vessels resection. Pure laparoscopic DP-CAR procedure with portal vein resection is effective and safe procedure that can be performed with all principles of open surgery and is associated with acceptable short- and long-term results.

Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Work-Up, Staging, and Local Intervention Strategies

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has several definitions but essentially is a nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer, in which upfront resection is considered not beneficial due to extensive vascular involvement and consequent high chance of a nonradical resection. The introduction of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (gem-nab) has had major implications for the management and outcome of patients with LAPC. After 4-6 months induction chemotherapy, the majority of patients have stable disease or even tumor-regression. Of these, 12 to 35% are successfully downstaged to resectable disease. Several studies have reported a 30-35 months overall survival after resection; although it currently remains unclear if this is a result of the resection or the good response to chemotherapy. Following chemotherapy, selection of patients for resection is difficult, as contrast-enhanced computed-tomography (CT) scan is unreliable in differentiating between viable tumor and fibrosis. In case a resection is not considered possible but stable disease is observed, local ablative techniques are being studied, such as irreversible electroporation, radiofrequency ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Pragmatic, multicenter, randomized studies will ultimately have to confirm the exact role of both surgical exploration and ablation in these patients. Since evidence-based guidelines for the management of LAPC are lacking, this review proposes a standardized approach for the treatment of LAPC based on the best available evidence.

Gastroduodenal artery: single key for many locks

Gastroduodenal artery (GDA) commonly arises from common hepatic artery, a branch of celiac axis. It holds a unique anatomical position that connects the foregut and midgut due to its intimate communications with foregut and midgut arterial supply. Its numerous anatomical variations have a significant impact on planning and performance of hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery. Its close relation to the first part of duodenum, common bile duct and head of pancreas makes it susceptible for inadvertent bleeding during or after surgery, or due to various HPB pathologies. Also, a large number of vascular interventions rely on GDA and its branches. Careful preoperative planning is the key and a detailed knowledge and awareness of its variant anatomy is of paramount importance, be it liver resections, liver transplant, biliary and pancreatic resections and pancreatic transplant or transarterial procedures involving these arteries. GDA can also be a cause of gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to true or pseudoaneurysms and anatomy has significant implications on its management. The article provides a succinct review on relevance of GDA anatomy and variations and highlights that preoperative planning and intraoperative awareness of variations is the key to performance of safe HPB surgery and interventions.

Appleby Procedure (Distal Pancreatectomy With Celiac Artery Resection) for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: Indications, Outcomes, and Imaging

OBJECTIVE. We describe the indications, surgical technique, outcome, and imaging findings in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with distal pancreatectomy and celiac artery resection (modified Appleby procedure). CONCLUSION. Distal pancreatectomy and celiac artery resection is a feasible surgery in selected patients with locally advanced PDAC. Knowledge of surgical technique and imaging features may aid radiologists in identifying patients with locally invasive PDAC who might benefit from resection and identifying characteristic distal pancreatectomy and celiac artery resection complications.