Local Referral of High-Risk Pancreatectomy Patients to Improve Surgical Outcomes and Minimize Travel Burden

Neighborhood Deprivation, Hospital Quality, and Mortality After Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if receipt of complex cancer surgery at high-quality hospitals is associated with a reduction in disparities between individuals living in the most and least deprived neighborhoods.

BACKGROUND

The association between social risk factors and worse surgical outcomes for patients undergoing high-risk cancer operations is well documented. To what extent neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation as an isolated social risk factor known to be associated with worse outcomes can be mitigated by hospital quality is less known.

METHODS

Using 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims, we analyzed data on 212,962 Medicare beneficiaries more than age 65 undergoing liver resection, rectal resection, lung resection, esophagectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer between 2014 and 2018. Clinical risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality rates were used to stratify hospitals into quintiles of quality. Beneficiaries were stratified into quintiles based on census tract Area Deprivation Index. The association of hospital quality and neighborhood deprivation with 30-day mortality was assessed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 212,962 patients in the cohort including 109,419 (51.4%) men with a mean (SD) age of 73.8 (5.9) years old. At low-quality hospitals, patients living in the most deprived areas had significantly higher risk-adjusted mortality than those from the least deprived areas for all procedures; esophagectomy: 22.3% versus 20.7%; P <0.003, liver resection 19.3% versus 16.4%; P <0.001, pancreatic resection 15.9% versus 12.9%; P <0.001, lung resection 8.3% versus 7.8%; P <0.001, rectal resection 8.8% versus 8.1%; P <0.001. Surgery at a high-quality hospitals was associated with no significant differences in mortality between individuals living in the most compared with least deprived neighborhoods for esophagectomy, rectal resection, liver resection, and pancreatectomy. For example, the adjusted odds of mortality between individuals living in the most deprived compared with least deprived neighborhoods following esophagectomy at low-quality hospitals (odds ratio=1.22, 95% CI: 1.14-1.31, P <0.001) was higher than at high-quality hospitals (odds ratio=0.98, 95% CI: 0.94-1.02, P =0.03).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Receipt of complex cancer surgery at a high-quality hospital was associated with no significant differences in mortality between individuals living in the most deprived neighborhoods compared with least deprived. Initiatives to increase access referrals to high-quality hospitals for patients from high deprivation levels may improve outcomes and contribute to mitigating disparities.

Association of Dual Medicare and Medicaid Eligibility With Outcomes and Spending for Cancer Surgery in High-Quality Hospitals

IMPORTANCE

Although dual eligibility (DE) status for Medicare and Medicaid has been used for social risk stratification in value-based payment programs, little is known about the interplay between hospital quality and disparities in outcomes and spending by social risk.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether treatment at high-quality hospitals mitigates DE-associated disparities in outcomes and spending for cancer surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, evaluating inpatient surgery at acute care hospitals. A total of 119 757 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who underwent colectomy, rectal resection, lung resection, or pancreatectomy were evaluated. Data were analyzed between November 1, 2020, and April 30, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Medicare and Medicaid DE status and hospital quality.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Postoperative complications, readmission, and mortality by DE status and hospital quality.

RESULTS

Overall, 119 757 Medicare beneficiaries underwent colectomy, rectal resection, lung resection, or pancreatectomy. The mean (SD) age was 75.3 (6.7) years, 61 617 (51.5%) were women, 7677 (6.4%) were Black, 106 099 (88.6%) were White, and 5981 (5.0%) identified as another race or ethnicity; 11.3% had DE status. Dually eligible patients were more likely to be discharged to a facility (colectomy, 15.0% [95% CI, 14.7%-15.3%] vs 23.9% [95% CI, 22.9%-24.9%]; proctectomy, 18.7% [95% CI, 18.0%-19.3%] vs 26.9% [95% CI, 24.9%-28.9%]; lung resection, 11.0% [95% CI, 10.7%-11.3%] vs 17.9% [95% CI, 16.8%-18.9%]; pancreatectomy, 23.5% [95% CI, 22.5%-24.4%] vs 30.0% [95% CI, 26.5%-33.5%]). Differences in postacute care use persisted even after accounting for postoperative complications and contributed to variation in spending. Compared with the lowest-quality hospitals, DE patients had improved rates of discharge to a facility (22.7% vs 19.3%) and spending ($22 577 vs $20 100) but rates remained increased compared with Medicare patients even at the highest-quality hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study indicate that, even among the highest-quality hospitals, DE patients had poorer outcomes and higher spending. Dually eligible patients were more likely to be discharged to a facility and therefore incurred higher postacute care costs. Although treatment at high-quality hospitals is associated with reduced differences in outcomes, DE patients remain at high risk for adverse postoperative outcomes and increased readmissions and postacute care use.

Accessing surgical care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Patient variation in travel distance and choice to bypass hospitals to reach higher volume centers

BACKGROUND

While better outcomes at high-volume surgical centers have driven regionalization of complex surgical care, access to high-volume centers often requires travel over longer distances. We sought to evaluate travel patterns of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer to assess willingness of patients to travel for surgical care.

METHODS

The California Office of Statewide Health Planning database was used to identify patients who underwent PD between 2005 and 2016. Total distance traveled, as well as whether a patient bypassed the nearest hospital that performed PD to get to a higher-volume center was assessed. Multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with bypassing a local hospital for a higher-volume center.

RESULTS

Among 23 014 patients who underwent PD, individuals traveled a median distance of 18.0 miles to get to a hospital that performed PD. The overwhelming majority (84%) of patients bypassed the nearest providing hospital and traveled a median additional 16.6 miles to their destination hospital. Among patients who bypassed the nearest hospital, 13,269 (68.6%) did so for a high-volume destination hospital. Specifically, average annual PD volume at the nearest "bypassed" vs final destination hospital was 29.6 vs 56 cases, respectively. Outcomes at bypassed vs destination hospitals varied (incidence of complications: 39.2% vs 32.4%; failure-to-rescue: 14.5% vs 9.1%). PD at a high-volume center was associated with lower mortality (OR = 0.46 95% CI, 0.22-0.95). High-volume PD ( > 20 cases) was predictive of hospital bypass (OR = 3.8 95% CI, 3.3-4.4). Among patients who had surgery at a low-volume center, nearly 20% bypassed a high-volume hospital in route. Furthermore, among patients who did not bypass a high-volume hospital, one-third would have needed to travel only an additional 30 miles or less to reach the nearest high-volume hospital.

CONCLUSION

Most patients undergoing PD bypassed the nearest providing hospital to seek care at a higher-volume hospital. While these data reflect increased regionalization of complex surgical care, nearly 1 in 5 patients still underwent PD at a low-volume center.