1
|
Yogo A, Nakakura EK. ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Prototypical Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5537-5538. [PMID: 38822170 PMCID: PMC11300467 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15562-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Akitada Yogo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric K Nakakura
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yogo A, Paciorek A, Kasai Y, Moon F, Hirose K, Corvera CU, Bergsland EK, Nakakura EK. Long-Term Survival Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Surgery for Ileal Neuroendocrine Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5507-5514. [PMID: 38797790 PMCID: PMC11300575 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15468-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal neuroendocrine tumors (i-NETs) are characterized by their multifocality and bulky mesenteric mass. Having shown that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) utilizing a hand-access port device has favorable short-term outcomes and achieves the goals of surgery for i-NETs, we sought to analyze long-term survival outcomes of MIS. METHODS One hundred and sixty-eight patients who underwent resection of primary i-NETs at a single institution between January 2007 and February 2023 were retrospectively studied. Patients were categorized into the MIS or open surgery cohorts on an intention-to-treat basis. Open surgery was selected mainly based on the need for hepatectomy or bulky mesenteric mass resection. Overall survival was analyzed using log-rank tests with propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards regression. PSM was performed to reduce standardized mean differences of the variables to <0.2. RESULTS Overall, 129 (77%) patients underwent MIS and 39 (23%) underwent open surgery. Twenty-seven MIS patients were converted to an open procedure. The median follow-up time was 49 months (interquartile range 23-87 months). In the PSM cohorts, overall survival did not differ significantly between the MIS and open surgery cohorts {median 99 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 91-not applicable [NA]) vs. 103 months (95% CI 86-NA), p = 0.77; hazard ratio 0.87 (95% CI 0.33-2.2), p = 0.77}. CONCLUSIONS MIS is an alternative to open surgery for i-NETs, achieving similar short- and long-term oncological outcomes. Bulky mesenteric mass and a plan for concurrent liver resection are potential criteria for open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akitada Yogo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alan Paciorek
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yosuke Kasai
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Farhana Moon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kenzo Hirose
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Carlos U Corvera
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emily K Bergsland
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric K Nakakura
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Padmanabhan Nair Sobha R, Jensen CT, Waters R, Calimano-Ramirez LF, Virarkar MK. Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Comprehensive Review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024; 48:545-562. [PMID: 37574653 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) is the most common adult appendiceal malignant tumor, constituting 16% of gastrointestinal NENs. They are versatile tumors with varying morphology, immunohistochemistry, secretory properties, and cancer genomics. They are slow growing and clinically silent, to begin with, or present with features of nonspecific vague abdominal pain. Most acute presentations are attributed clinically to appendicitis, with most cases detected incidentally on pathology after an appendectomy. Approximately 40% of them present clinically with features of hormonal excess, which is likened to the functional secretory nature of their parent cell of origin. The symptoms of carcinoid syndrome render their presence clinically evident. However, slow growing and symptomatically silent in its initial stages, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the appendix are aggressive and usually have hepatic and lymph node metastasis at presentation. This review article focuses on imaging characteristics, World Health Organization histopathological classification and grading, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union or International Cancer Control, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society standardized guidelines for reporting, data interpretation, early-stage management protocols, and advanced-stage appendiceal NENs. Guidelines are also set for the follow-up and reassessment. The role of targeted radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and high-dose somatostatin analogs in treating advanced disease are discussed, along with types of ablative therapies and liver transplantation for tumor recurrence. The search for newer location-specific biomarkers in NEN is also summarized. Regarding the varying aggressiveness of the tumor, there is a scope for research in the field, with plenty of data yet to be discovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Corey T Jensen
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Rebecca Waters
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Mayur K Virarkar
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eneholm J, Beka E, Kotán R, Gimm O. A retrospective study comparing minimally invasive versus open surgical resection of small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms at a tertiary referral center. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107936. [PMID: 38176259 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NEN) are the commonest malignancies of the small intestine. Traditionally, surgical treatment for SI-NEN has been open surgery. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with the traditional open surgery approach for treating SI-NEN in a Swedish population. METHODS Patients with histopathological confirmed SI-NEN who underwent open surgery or MIS resection within 2009-2021 were extracted from the hospital's medical records. RESULTS 65 patients were included in this study, with 35 (54 %) undergoing MIS and 30 (46 %) undergoing open surgery. We found no statistically significant difference (p = 0.173) in the frequency of R0 resections (MIS group n = 34 (97 %), open surgery group n = 26 (87 %)). Nor was there a significant difference (p = 0.101) when comparing the median number of resected lymph nodes (MIS group n = 13.5, open surgery group n = 10). A post-operative paralytic ileus was more often reported (p = 0.052) in the MIS group (n = 9, 26 %) compared to the open surgery group (n = 2, 7 %). In light of this, the days of hospital stay did not differ significantly (MIS group median = 6, IQR (5-8), open surgery group median = 6, IQR (5-9)). The Kaplan-Meier analysis did not reveal differences concerning cancer-related deaths (p = 0.109). CONCLUSION The results from this study support that a MIS approach for the treatment of SI-NEN may not be inferior to open surgery. The higher number of resected lymph nodes and R0 resections may even speak in favor for a MIS approach. More studies with a longer time of observation are needed to further support this conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Eneholm
- Department of Surgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58185, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ervin Beka
- Department of Surgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58185, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Róbert Kotán
- Department of Surgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58185, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Oliver Gimm
- Department of Surgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58185, Linköping, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaçmaz E, Engelsman AF, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Nieveen van Dijkum EJM. International survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive surgery in small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:1251-1257. [PMID: 34823919 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although minimally invasive surgery is becoming the standard technique in gastrointestinal surgery, implementation for small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms (SB-NEN) is lagging behind. The aim of this international survey was to gain insights into attitudes towards minimally invasive surgery for resection of SB-NEN and current practices. METHODS An anonymous survey was sent to surgeons between February and May 2021 via (neuro)endocrine and colorectal societies worldwide. The survey consisted of questions regarding experience of the surgeon with minimally invasive SB-NEN resection and training. RESULTS A total of 58 responses from five societies across 20 countries were included. Forty-one (71%) respondents worked at academic centers. Thirty-seven (64%) practiced colorectal surgery, 24 (41%) endocrine surgery and 45 (78%) had experience in advanced minimally invasive surgery. An open, laparoscopic or robotic approach was preferred by 23 (42%), 24 (44%), and 8 (15%) respondents, respectively. Reasons to opt for a minimally invasive approach were mainly related to peri-operative benefits, while an open approach was preferred for optimal mesenteric lymphadenectomy and tactile feedback. Additional training in minimally invasive SB-NEN resection was welcomed by 29 (52%) respondents. Forty-three (74%) respondents were interested in collaborating in future studies, with a cumulative median (IQR) annual case load of 172 (86-258). CONCLUSIONS Among respondents, 69% applies minimally invasive surgery for resection of SB-NEN. Arguments for specific operative approaches differ, and insufficient training in advanced laparoscopic techniques seems to be a barrier. Future collaborative studies can provide better insight in selection criteria and optimal technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enes Kaçmaz
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Center for Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumours, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Anton F Engelsman
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Center for Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumours, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Center for Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumours, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth J M Nieveen van Dijkum
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Center for Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumours, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaçmaz E, Chen JW, Tanis PJ, Nieveen van Dijkum EJM, Engelsman AF. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after surgical resection of small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroendocrinol 2021; 33:e13008. [PMID: 34235792 PMCID: PMC8459236 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although small bowel resection is generally considered a low risk gastrointestinal procedure, this might not be true for small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms (SB-NEN) as a result of potential central mesenteric involvement. We aimed to determine the reported morbidity and mortality after resection of SB-NEN in the literature and assess the effect of hospital volume on postoperative morbidity and mortality. A systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE and Embase in March 2021. All studies reporting morbidity and/or mortality after SB-NEN resection were included. Pooled proportions of overall morbidity (Clavien-Dindo I-IV), severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III-IV), 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were calculated, as well as the association with hospital volume (high volume defined as the fourth quartile). Thirteen studies were included, with a total of 1087 patients. Pooled proportions revealed an overall morbidity of 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7%-24%, I2 = 90%), severe morbidity of 7% (95% CI = 4%-14%, I2 = 70%), 30-day mortality of 2% (95% CI = 1%-3%, I2 = 0%), 90-day mortality of2% (95% CI = 2%-4%, I2 = 35%) and in-hospital mortality of 1% (95% CI = 0%-2%, I2 = 0%). An annual hospital volume of nine or more resections was associated with lower overall and severe morbidity compared to lower volume: 10% vs 15% and 4% vs 9%, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was similar (2% vs 1%) and 90-day mortality was higher in high-volume hospitals: 4% vs 1%. This systematic review with meta-analyses showed severe morbidity of 7% and low mortality rates after resection of SB-NEN. The currently available literature suggests a certain impact of hospital volume on postoperative outcomes, although heterogeneity among the included studies constrains interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enes Kaçmaz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey W Chen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
| | - Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
| | - Anton F Engelsman
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|