1
|
Breyre AM, Wang DH, Brooten JK, Colwell CB, Hanson KC, Taigman M, Lyng JW. EMS Care of Adult Hospice Patients- a Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP and AAHPM. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2023; 27:560-565. [PMID: 36961936 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2193978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
Emergency medical services (EMS) systems are designed to provide care in the field and while transporting patients to a hospital; however, patients enrolled in hospice may not want invasive therapies nor benefit from hospitalization. For many reasons, encounters with hospice patients can be challenging for EMS systems, EMS clinicians, hospice clinicians, hospice patients, and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia M Breyre
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David H Wang
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Scripps Health, San Diego, California
| | - Justin K Brooten
- Department of Emergency Medicine & Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Christopher B Colwell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco Zuckerburg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Kenneth C Hanson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Central Michigan University College of Medicine-East Campus, Saginaw, Michigan
| | | | - John W Lyng
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gettel CJ, Yiadom MYA, Bernstein SL, Grudzen CR, Nath B, Li F, Hwang U, Hess EP, Melnick ER. Pragmatic clinical trial design in emergency medicine: Study considerations and design types. Acad Emerg Med 2022; 29:1247-1257. [PMID: 35475533 PMCID: PMC9790188 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) focus on correlation between treatment and outcomes in real-world clinical practice, yet a guide highlighting key study considerations and design types for emergency medicine investigators pursuing this important study type is not available. Investigators conducting emergency department (ED)-based PCTs face multiple decisions within the planning phase to ensure robust and meaningful study findings. The PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2 (PRECIS-2) tool allows trialists to consider both pragmatic and explanatory components across nine domains, shaping the trial design to the purpose intended by the investigators. Aside from the PRECIS-2 tool domains, ED-based investigators conducting PCTs should also consider randomization techniques, human subjects concerns, and integration of trial components within the electronic health record. The authors additionally highlight the advantages, disadvantages, and rationale for the use of four common randomized study design types to be considered in PCTs: parallel, crossover, factorial, and stepped-wedge. With increasing emphasis on the conduct of PCTs, emergency medicine investigators will benefit from a rigorous approach to clinical trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J. Gettel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Maame Yaa A.B. Yiadom
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Corita R. Grudzen
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bidisha Nath
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Fan Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ula Hwang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Erik P. Hess
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Edward R. Melnick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
End of life care pathways in the Emergency Department and their effects on patient and health service outcomes: An integrative review. Int Emerg Nurs 2022; 61:101153. [PMID: 35240435 DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION End of life (EOL) care in the Emergency Department (ED) requires focused, person-centred care to meet the needs of this vulnerable cohort of patients. METHODS An integrative review of the literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was conducted. Studies were included if they were primary research relating to patients in the ED at the EOL, and/or evaluated EOL care pathways in the ED. Databases OVID Emcare, OVID Medline, and Scopus were searched from 1966-September 2021; followed by screening and appraisal. Articles were compared and data grouped into categories. RESULTS Eleven research articles were included generating three categories for EOL care in ED. 1) tools/criteria to identify patients who may require EOL care in ED; 2) processes for providing EOL care, and 3) implementation methods/frameworks to support the uptake of EOL care processes. CONCLUSION There were some commonalities in the criteria used to identify patients who may be at their EOL and the interventions implemented thereafter. There was no standardised process for screening for or treating EOL care needs in the ED. Further research is required to determine the impact that EOL care pathways have on patient and health service outcomes to inform strategies for future policy development.
Collapse
|
4
|
Richesson RL, Marsolo KS, Douthit BJ, Staman K, Ho PM, Dailey D, Boyd AD, McTigue KM, Ezenwa MO, Schlaeger JM, Patil CL, Faurot KR, Tuzzio L, Larson EB, O'Brien EC, Zigler CK, Lakin JR, Pressman AR, Braciszewski JM, Grudzen C, Fiol GD. Enhancing the use of EHR systems for pragmatic embedded research: lessons from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2626-2640. [PMID: 34597383 PMCID: PMC8633608 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We identified challenges and solutions to using electronic health record (EHR) systems for the design and conduct of pragmatic research. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since 2012, the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory has served as the resource coordinating center for 21 pragmatic clinical trial demonstration projects. The EHR Core working group invited these demonstration projects to complete a written semistructured survey and used an inductive approach to review responses and identify EHR-related challenges and suggested EHR enhancements. RESULTS We received survey responses from 20 projects and identified 21 challenges that fell into 6 broad themes: (1) inadequate collection of patient-reported outcome data, (2) lack of structured data collection, (3) data standardization, (4) resources to support customization of EHRs, (5) difficulties aggregating data across sites, and (6) accessing EHR data. DISCUSSION Based on these findings, we formulated 6 prerequisites for PCTs that would enable the conduct of pragmatic research: (1) integrate the collection of patient-centered data into EHR systems, (2) facilitate structured research data collection by leveraging standard EHR functions, usable interfaces, and standard workflows, (3) support the creation of high-quality research data by using standards, (4) ensure adequate IT staff to support embedded research, (5) create aggregate, multidata type resources for multisite trials, and (6) create re-usable and automated queries. CONCLUSION We are hopeful our collection of specific EHR challenges and research needs will drive health system leaders, policymakers, and EHR designers to support these suggestions to improve our national capacity for generating real-world evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Richesson
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Keith S Marsolo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brian J Douthit
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,US Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Karen Staman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Dana Dailey
- Center for Health Sciences, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, Iowa and Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Andrew D Boyd
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kathleen M McTigue
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Miriam O Ezenwa
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida, College of Nursing, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Judith M Schlaeger
- Department of Human Development Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Crystal L Patil
- Department of Human Development Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keturah R Faurot
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leah Tuzzio
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Emily C O'Brien
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christina K Zigler
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Palliative Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alice R Pressman
- Center for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health Center for Health Systems Research, Walnut Creek, California, USA
| | - Jordan M Braciszewski
- Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Corita Grudzen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|