1
|
Nijs J, Mostaqim K, Oostendorp R. Exercise therapy and physical activity in the paradigm shift from a tissue- and disease-based pain management approach towards multimodal lifestyle interventions for chronic pain. Braz J Phys Ther 2024; 28:101101. [PMID: 39096869 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Chronic pain rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physical Therapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium; Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physical Therapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Kenza Mostaqim
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Research Foundation Flanders - FWO, Belgium
| | - Rob Oostendorp
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spinella S, McCarthy R. Buprenorphine for Pain: A Narrative Review and Practical Applications. Am J Med 2024; 137:406-413. [PMID: 38340973 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Chronic noncancer pain affects about 20% of US adults and can significantly affect function and quality of life. Current guidelines recommend multimodal pain control. Despite risks associated with long-term opioid therapy, opioids are commonly prescribed. Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist with an improved safety profile compared to full agonists. Some formulations are approved for chronic pain and others for opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine is an option for patients who use chronic daily opioids for pain. This review summarizes the literature on buprenorphine's efficacy and safety for chronic pain and provides recommendations to generalists on initiation, titration, and monitoring of buprenorphine-based pain treatment. We also discuss a communication approach when considering buprenorphine for pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Spinella
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pa.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bello CM, Mackert S, Harnik MA, Filipovic MG, Urman RD, Luedi MM. Shared Decision-Making in Acute Pain Services. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:193-202. [PMID: 37155131 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01111-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) in acute pain services (APS) is still in its infancies especially when compared to other medical fields. RECENT FINDINGS Emerging evidence fosters the value of SDM in various acute care settings. We provide an overview of general SDM practices and possible advantages of incorporating such concepts in APS, point out barriers to SDM in this setting, present common patient decisions aids developed for APS and discuss opportunities for further development. Especially in the APS setting, patient-centred care is a key component for optimal patient outcome. SDM could be included into everyday clinical practice by using structured approaches such as the "seek, help, assess, reach, evaluate" (SHARE) approach, the 3 "MAking Good decisions In Collaboration"(MAGIC) questions, the "Benefits, Risks, Alternatives and doing Nothing"(BRAN) tool or the "the multifocal approach to sharing in shared decision-making"(MAPPIN'SDM) as guidance for participatory decision-making. Such tools aid in the development of a patient-clinician relationship beyond discharge after immediate relief of acute pain has been accomplished. Research addressing patient decision aids and their impact on patient-reported outcomes regarding shared decision-making, organizational barriers and new developments such as remote shared decision-making is needed to advance participatory decision-making in acute pain services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina M Bello
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Freiburgstrasse Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Simone Mackert
- Department of Anaesthesiology Spital Grabs, Spitalregion Rheintal Werdenberg Sarganserland, Spitalstrasse 44, Grabs, St. Gallen, 9472, Switzerland
| | - Michael A Harnik
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Freiburgstrasse Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mark G Filipovic
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Freiburgstrasse Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anaesthesiology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Markus M Luedi
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Freiburgstrasse Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krebs EE, Becker WC, Nelson D, DeRonne BM, Nugent S, Jensen AC, Amundson EC, Manuel JK, Borsari B, Kats AM, Seal KH. Design, methods, and recruitment outcomes of the Veterans' Pain Care Organizational Improvement Comparative Effectiveness (VOICE) study. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 124:107001. [PMID: 36384218 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
The Veterans' Pain Care Organizational Improvement Comparative Effectiveness (VOICE) study is a 12-month pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial conducted at ten United States Veterans Affairs (VA) health care sites. The overall goal was to test interventions to improve pain while reducing opioid use among VA patients with moderate-severe chronic pain despite treatment with long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). Aims were 1) to compare lower-intensity telecare collaborative pain management (TCM) versus higher-intensity integrated pain team management (IPT), and 2) to test the option of switching to buprenorphine (versus no option) in a high-dose subgroup. Recruitment challenges included secular trends in opioid prescribing and the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were recruited over 3.5 years. Of 6966 potentially eligible patients, 4731 (67.9%) were contacted for telephone eligibility interview; of those contacted, 3398 (71.8%) declined participation, 359 (7.6%) were ineligible, 821 (24.2%) enrolled, and 820 (24.1%) were randomized. The most common reason for declining was satisfaction with pain care (n = 731). The most common reason for ineligibility was not having moderate-severe chronic pain (n = 110). Compared with the potentially eligible population, randomized participants were slightly younger, more often female, had similar prescribed opioids, and had similar or higher rates of pain and mental health diagnoses. The enrolled patient number was lower than the original target, but sufficient to power planned analyses. In conclusion, the VOICE trial enrolled a diverse sample similar to the population of VA patients receiving LTOT. Results will add substantially to limited existing evidence for interventions to improve pain while reducing opioid use. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03026790.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Krebs
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America; University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
| | - William C Becker
- Connecticut VA Health Care System, West Haven, CT, United States of America; Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - David Nelson
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America; University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Beth M DeRonne
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Sean Nugent
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Agnes C Jensen
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Erin C Amundson
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Jennifer K Manuel
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Brian Borsari
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Allyson M Kats
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Karen H Seal
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boyle EM, Fary RE, Lee S, Mikhailov A, Evans K, Rebbeck T, Beales DJ. Patient perspectives of care pathways for people with low back pain: A qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 62:102657. [PMID: 36058010 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) care pathways aim to enhance health outcomes through patient-clinician mutual decision-making and care coordination. However, challenges to successful translation into practice include patients' understanding, expectation, and acceptance of treatment and management strategies for LBP. This study explored patients' perspectives and/or experience of care pathways and their involvement in decision-making in primary care. METHODS A qualitative descriptive design was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 participants with LBP recruited from the community. Inductive thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted within the design framework to enable a systematic comparison of experiences across participants and within individual cases. RESULTS Five themes described participant perspectives and understanding of care pathways: i) care pathways can guide decision-making; ii) familiarity with no and/or stepped care pathway, but preference for matched or blend of care pathways; iii) engaging in shared decision-making; iv) patient-related barriers to implementation; v) patient-related facilitators to implementation. CONCLUSIONS Participants felt that existing care pathways did not meet their needs when pain persisted. Participants preferred matched or hybrid care pathways and suggested that implementation of such pathways should focus on addressing an individual's needs. Adopting a holistic approach, and clarity in shared decision-making, were deemed crucial for effective implementation of LBP pathways in practice. Consumer (patient) engagement in the design of LBP care pathways is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen M Boyle
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Robyn E Fary
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Samantha Lee
- Department of Allied Health, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore
| | - Anton Mikhailov
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kerrie Evans
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Healthia Limited, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Darren J Beales
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Henry SG, Fenton JJ, Campbell CI, Sullivan M, Weinberg G, Naz H, Graham WM, Dossett ML, Kravitz RL. Development and Testing of a Communication Intervention to Improve Chronic Pain Management in Primary Care: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin J Pain 2022; 38:620-631. [PMID: 36037051 PMCID: PMC9481730 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Effective communication skills are essential for optimally managing chronic pain and opioids. This exploratory, sequential mixed methods study tested the effect of a novel framework designed to improve pain-related communication and outcomes. METHODS Study 1 developed a novel 5-step framework for helping primary care clinicians discuss chronic pain and opioids with patients. Study 2 pilot tested an intervention for teaching this framework using standardized patient instructors-actors trained to portray patients and provide immediate clinician feedback-deployed during regular clinic hours. Primary care physicians were randomized to receive either the intervention or pain management recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Primary outcomes were pain-related interference at 2 months and clinician use of targeted communication skills (coded from transcripts of audio-recorded visits); secondary outcomes were pain intensity at 2 months, clinician self-efficacy for communicating about chronic pain, patient experience, and clinician-reported visit difficulty. RESULTS We enrolled 47 primary care physicians from 2 academic teaching clinics and recorded visits with 48 patients taking opioids for chronic pain who had an appointment scheduled with an enrolled physician. The intervention was not associated with significant changes in primary or secondary outcomes other than clinician self-efficacy, which was significantly greater in the intervention group. DISCUSSION This study developed a novel framework and intervention for teaching clinician pain-related communications skills. Although the intervention showed promise, more intensive or multicomponent interventions may be needed to have a significant impact on clinicians' pain-related communication and pain outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen G Henry
- Departments of Internal Medicine
- University of California Davis Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, CA
| | - Joshua J Fenton
- Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA
- University of California Davis Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, CA
| | - Cynthia I Campbell
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Mark Sullivan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Gary Weinberg
- University of California Davis Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, CA
| | - Hiba Naz
- University of California Davis Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, CA
| | - Wyatt M Graham
- University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - Richard L Kravitz
- Departments of Internal Medicine
- University of California Davis Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, CA
| |
Collapse
|