Performance of risk assessment tools for predicting osteoporosis in south Indian rural elderly men

Diabetes and Osteoporosis

Bone fragility is an emerging complication of diabetes. People with diabetes are at a significantly higher risk of fractures compared to the general population. Bone fragility occurs in diabetes as a result of complex and poorly understood mechanisms occurring at the cellular level contributed by vascular, inflammatory and mechanical derangements. Bone mineral density (BMD) as assessed by DEXA is low in type 1 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes has a high risk of fracture despite a normal to raised BMD. DEXA thus underestimates the fracture risk in diabetes. Data are scare regarding the efficacy of the available therapies in this low bone turnover state.

Routine chest CT combined with the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA): a screening tool for patients with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

The osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) is a common screening tool for osteoporosis. The seventh thoracic CT (CT-T7) Hounsfield unit (HU) measured by chest CT correlates with osteoporosis. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of OSTA alone, CT-T7 alone, or the combination of OSTA and CT-T7 in osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 1268 participants were grouped into 586 men and 682 women. We established multiple linear regression models by combining CT-T7 and OSTA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the ability to diagnose osteoporosis.

RESULTS

In the male group, the mean age was 59.02 years, and 108 patients (18.4%) had osteoporosis. In the female group, the mean age was 63.23 years, and 308 patients (45.2%) had osteoporosis. By ROC curve comparison, the CT-T7 (male, AUC = 0.789, 95% CI 0.745-0.832; female, AUC = 0.835, 95% CI 0.805-0.864) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis was greater than the OSTA (male, AUC = 0.673, 95% CI 0.620-0.726; female, AUC = 0.775, 95% CI 0.741-0.810) in both the male and female groups (p < 0.001). When OSTA was combined with CT, the equation of multiple linear regression (MLR) was obtained as follows: female = 3.020-0.028*OSTA-0.004*CT-T7. In the female group, it was found that the AUC of MLR (AUC = 0.853, 95% CI 0.825-0.880) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis was larger than that of CT-T7 (p < 0.01). When the MLR was 2.65, the sensitivity and specificity were 53.9% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For a patient who has completed chest CT, CT-T7 (HU) combined with OSTA is recommended to identify the high-risk population of osteoporosis, and it has a higher diagnostic value than OSTA alone or CT-T7 alone, especially among females. For a female with MLR greater than 2.65, further DXA examination is needed.

OSTA as a screening tool to predict osteoporosis in Indian postmenopausal women - a nationwide study

This cross-sectional study done on 5356 postmenopausal women showed that OSTA may be used as a reliable screening tool for osteoporosis across different regions of India, a country known for its ethno-linguistic, cultural, and genetic diversity.

BACKGROUND

The gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis is DXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) scan, and this is not widely available across India. OSTA (Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians) score predicts risk of osteoporosis and can be used as reference tool for DXA. At a cutoff of ≤  + 1, OSTA predicted femoral neck osteoporosis with a sensitivity of 88% in a previous study among south Indian postmenopausal women. This study was done to validate the OSTA score in postmenopausal women across India.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study in 5356 postmenopausal women from four regions of India namely south, east, north, and west. Bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) were assessed by DXA. The performance of OSTA in predicting BMD and TBS was assessed using ROC curve.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age was 61.6 (7.6) years. The performance of OSTA in predicting osteoporosis was fair (P < 0.001) with an AUC of 0.727 (95% CI 0.705-0.749) in the south, 0.693 (95% CI 0.664-0.723) in east India, 0.730 (95% CI 0.700-0.759) in the north, and 0.703 (95% CI 0.672-0.735) in the western region. At a cut-off below + 1.0, sensitivity was 76-84% and specificity was 45-53% in diagnosing osteoporosis at any site. In predicting degraded microarchitecture, the AUC was 0.500-0.600.

CONCLUSION

OSTA may be reliably used as a screening tool for women at high risk of osteoporosis across India and may circumvent the limited availability of DXA scanners across the country.

The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults

The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) has herein drafted clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis for the people of India. Implementation of the position statement in clinical practice is expected to improve the overall care of patients with osteoporosis in India.

PURPOSE

In India, osteoporosis is a major public health problem. However, in the absence of any robust regional guidelines, the screening, treatment, and follow-up of patients with osteoporosis are lagging behind in the country.

METHODS

The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR), which is a multidisciplinary group of physicians, researchers, dietitians, and epidemiologists and who study bone and related tissues, in their annual meeting, drafted the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis that would be appropriate in a resource constraint setting like India.

RESULTS

Diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in a patient with minimal trauma fracture without the aid of any other diagnostic tools. In others, bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry remains the modality of choice. Data indicates that osteoporotic fractures occur at an earlier age in Indians than in the West; hence, screening for osteoporosis should begin at an earlier age. FRAX can be used for fracture risk estimation; however, it may underestimate the risk of future fractures in our population and still needs validation. Maintaining optimum serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels is essential, which, in most cases, would require regular vitamin D supplementation. Pharmacotherapy should be guided by the presence/absence of vertebral/hip fractures or the severity of risk based on clinical factors, although bisphosphonates remain the first choice in most cases. Regular follow-up is essential to ensure adherence and response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the position statement in clinical practice is expected to improve the overall care of patients with osteoporosis in India.

Clinician's guide for the management and research of osteoporosis in North African men: a guidelines comparison, a cost-effectiveness analysis, and a local algorithm

A local management algorithm and practice recommendations for the management of osteoporosis in Egyptian males were developed after assessing the applicability of current international recommendations and the cost effectiveness of local drugs. A systematic review and sensitivity analyses augmented the quality of the research efforts.

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis affects both men and women; however, no local recommendations for the condition are available for the male population. Therefore, this study was undertaken to produce recommendations for men based on the applicability of current international recommendations and the cost effectiveness of local drugs.

METHODS

The International Osteoporosis Foundation website, EMBASE, and SUMSEARCH-2 databases were searched to identify all guidelines that included recommendations for males. Regional and international guidelines were then appraised using the Advancing Guideline Development, Reporting, and Evaluation in Healthcare-II tool. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the perspective of an uninsured patient, international outcomes, and local costs. Recommendations were then formulated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines, and symbolic representations.

RESULTS

Twenty-six guidelines were found. Only one of the guidelines focused entirely on males, with the remainder making inferences based on recommendations for females. Six regional guidelines were mainly of low quality. Alendronate was considered to be the most cost-effective drug, while teriparatide was found to be unaffordable.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations for men with osteoporosis are based on that of women, and the topic lacks exploration in the Middle East. International recommendations and other guidelines were evaluated and adopted to create guidance for the management of osteoporosis in men for application in Egypt.

The performance of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) in identifying the risk of osteoporosis among Malaysian population aged 40 years and above

The concordance between osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was fair in the study. Modification of OSTA cutoff values improved its sensitivity to identify subjects at risk for suboptimal bone health (osteopenia/osteoporosis) and osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) is a convenient screening algorithm used widely to identify patients at risk of osteoporosis. Currently, the number of studies validating OSTA in Malaysian population is limited. This study aimed to validate the performance of OSTA in identifying subjects with osteoporosis determined with DXA.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study recruited 786 Malaysians in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Their bone health status was assessed by DXA and OSTA. The association and agreement between OSTA and bone mineral density assessment by DXA were determined by Pearson's correlation and Cohen's kappa, respectively. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for OSTA.

RESULTS

OSTA and DXA showed a fair association in the study (r = 0.382, κ = 0.159, p < 0.001). OSTA (cutoff < - 1) revealed a sensitivity of 32.3%, specificity of 92.3%, and AUC of 0.618 in identifying subjects with suboptimal bone health. The sensitivity of OSTA (cutoff < - 4) in determining subjects at risk of osteoporosis was better among women (sensitivity = 20%) than men (sensitivity = 0%). Modified OSTA cutoff values improved the sensitivity of OSTA in identifying subjects with suboptimal bone health (men = 81.0% at cutoff 3.4, women = 82.8% at cutoff 2.0) and osteoporosis (men = 81.8% at cutoff 1.8, women = 81.3% at cutoff 0.8).

CONCLUSION

OSTA with its original cutoff values is ineffective in identifying individuals at risk for osteoporosis. Adjusting the cutoff values significantly increases the sensitivity of OSTA, thus highlighting the need to validate this instrument among the local population before using it for osteoporosis screening clinically.

Referral pattern for DXA scanning in a tertiary care centre from southern India

Referral patterns for bone mineral density testing by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning are seldom studied. In our study, the overall proportion of referrals from specialties remained low. This highlights the need for adequate utilisation of DXA by specialties treating subjects at risk for osteoporosis.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

The knowledge of referral patterns for DXA scanning (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is relevant in a developing country like India. We studied the referral source and clinical and densitometric profile of patients referred for DXA scanning at a south Indian tertiary care centre.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study over 3 months and included subjects referred during this period for BMD assessment (lumbar spine and femoral neck) by DXA scan. Details regarding referring departments and reasons for referral were collected. The number of patients seen in individual departments was obtained during the study period and respective proportions of patients referred were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 1932 subjects included in the study, we observed a definite female preponderance (90.2%), with a mean (SD) age of 51.6 (13.3) years. The greatest number of referrals came from the departments of rheumatology (37%; n = 724) and endocrinology (20%; n = 382). Overall, 36% were referred for inflammatory arthritis or systemic inflammatory disorders (n = 696) and 34% for postmenopausal state screening (n = 657). In relation to the individual outpatient strength, the departments who referred the highest proportion of their patients were rheumatology (6.8%), endocrinology (1.76%) and geriatrics (1.05%). A diagnosis of osteoporosis at any one site was made in 41% (448 of 1107) and the BMD was below the expected range for age in 37% (304 of 825) of the referrals.

CONCLUSION

Most referrals for DXA scanning were from rheumatology. Among the referred patients, about two fifth had osteoporosis and over one third had BMD below expected range for age. Although referrals by rheumatology were relatively higher, overall referrals from all departments remained low. This underscores the need for adequate utilisation of DXA by specialties treating subjects at risk for osteoporosis.

Performance of Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST) in Predicting Osteoporosis-A Review

Bone health screening plays a vital role in the early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis to prevent fragility fractures among the elderly and high-risk individuals. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which detects bone mineral density, is the gold standard in diagnosing osteoporosis but is not suitable for screening. Therefore, many screening tools have been developed to identify individuals at risk for osteoporosis and prioritize them for DXA scanning. The Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool (OST) is among the first tools established to predict osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. It can identify the population at risk for osteoporosis, but its performance varies according to ethnicity, gender, and age. Thus, these factors should be considered to ensure the optimal use of OST worldwide. Overall, OST is a simple and economical screening tool to predict osteoporosis and it can help to optimize the use of DXA.