Efficacy of risedronate with cholecalciferol on bone mineral density in Korean patients with osteoporosis

Effect of supplemental vitamin D3 on bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Context

There is still controversy over the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on bone health.

Objective

The effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover, as well as the dose-response relationship between vitamin D3 and bone health in adults, were evaluated.

Data Sources

The PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and AGRIS databases were searched for articles published through April 30, 2022. Thirty-nine of the 6409 records identified met the inclusion criteria

Data Extraction

Data were extracted from articles by 2 authors, and data extraction was cross-checked independently. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled effect size and the associated 95%CI for the effect of vitamin D3 for each outcome. A one-stage random-effects dose-response model was used to estimate the dose-response relationship between vitamin D3 supplementation and BMD.

Data Analysis

Results of meta-analysis showed a beneficial effect of vitamin D3 at the lumbar spine (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.06; 95%CI, 0.01–0.12) and femoral neck (SMD = 0.25; 95%CI, 0.09–0.41). Dose-response analysis revealed a linear relationship between vitamin D3 supplementation doses and BMD at the femoral neck, lumbar spine, and total hip sites. No significant effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on whole-body or total hip BMD was observed (P > 0.05). Vitamin D3 supplementation significantly decreased BMD at both proximal and distal forearm (SMD = −0.16; 95%CI, −0.26 to −0.06). The variables of ethnicity, age, baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), menopause status, vitamin D3 dosing frequency, and bone health status (P interaction = 0.02) altered the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on BMD. Additionally, a nonlinear relationship between vitamin D3 supplement doses and markers of bone turnover was found.

Conclusion

A protective effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip is implicated.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO registration number CRD42017054132.

Quality of life and patient satisfaction with raloxifene/cholecalciferol combination therapy in postmenopausal women

This study was performed to evaluate quality of life (QOL) and patient satisfaction with raloxifene/cholecalciferol combination therapy in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. This multicenter, prospective, noninterventional observational study included 3907 postmenopausal women who received a combination of raloxifene 60 mg and cholecalciferol 800 IU daily to treat or prevent osteoporosis. Changes in QOL and patient satisfaction were evaluated after 3 and 6 months of treatment. In addition, the safety profile was assessed. Mean age was 67.7 ± 9.3 years old. QOL, assessed by European Quality of life instrument 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index, improved significantly after 3 months (0.81 ± 0.11, P < 0.001) and 6 months (0.82 ± 0.11, P < 0.001) of treatment compared to the baseline (0.78 ± 0.14). Improvement in QOL was also significant regardless of previous regimens both in women who were switched from other drugs (bisphosphonates or selective estrogen receptor modulators) and in women who received the study drug for the first time (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Percentage of women satisfied with the effects (from 37.3 to 67.7%, P < 0.001) and convenience (from 42.8 to 74.1%, P < 0.001) of treatment compared to previous medication significantly increased after 6 months of treatment. In addition, serious adverse drug reactions did not occur, and hot flushes were observed only in 12 women (0.3%). Combination therapy with raloxifene and cholecalciferol significantly improves quality of life with no serious adverse events and high patient satisfaction at 6 months. Our real-world data suggest that this regimen is a promising option for postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Fracture recurrence in hip fracture with menopausal hormone therapy versus risedronate: a clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

An open-label, randomized trial was conducted to examine the effects of risedronate versus menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in postmenopausal women with recent hip fracture.

METHODS

Among 1165 eligible women, 281 were recruited and randomly assigned to receive oral risedronate (35 mg/week) or percutaneous estradiol gel (1.5 mg/day) plus oral micronized progesterone (100 mg/day) for 4 years. The primary end point was recurrent fracture and the secondary end points were mortality and bone mineral density (BMD).

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no significant differences in fracture recurrence and mortality between the two groups. The incidence of any new fracture per 100 person-years (PY) was 8.63 in the risedronate group and 12.86 in the MHT group (p = 0.180); that of clinical fracture was 4.75 and 6.99, respectively (p = 0.265); and that of asymptomatic vertebral fracture was 4.87 and 5.58, respectively (p = 0.764). The respective incidence of death per 100 PY was 3.58 and 4.40 (p = 0.503). BMD increased comparably at the lumbar spine in both groups. BMD at the total hip did not change in the risedronate group, but increased significantly by 2.8% in the MHT group.

CONCLUSIONS

MHT might not differ from risedronate in the prevention of secondary fractures and death among postmenopausal women with recent hip fracture.