1
|
Zhang M, Tong J, Ma W, Luo C, Liu H, Jiang Y, Qin L, Wang X, Yuan L, Zhang J, Peng F, Chen Y, Li W, Jiang Y. Predictors of Lung Adenocarcinoma With Leptomeningeal Metastases: A 2022 Targeted-Therapy-Assisted molGPA Model. Front Oncol 2022; 12:903851. [PMID: 35795063 PMCID: PMC9252592 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.903851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore prognostic indicators of lung adenocarcinoma with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) and provide an updated graded prognostic assessment model integrated with molecular alterations (molGPA). Methods A cohort of 162 patients was enrolled from 202 patients with lung adenocarcinoma and LM. By randomly splitting data into the training (80%) and validation (20%) sets, the Cox regression and random survival forest methods were used on the training set to identify statistically significant variables and construct a prognostic model. The C-index of the model was calculated and compared with that of previous molGPA models. Results The Cox regression and random forest models both identified four variables, which included KPS, LANO neurological assessment, TKI therapy line, and controlled primary tumor, as statistically significant predictors. A novel targeted-therapy-assisted molGPA model (2022) using the above four prognostic factors was developed to predict LM of lung adenocarcinoma. The C-indices of this prognostic model in the training and validation sets were higher than those of the lung-molGPA (2017) and molGPA (2019) models. Conclusions The 2022 molGPA model, a substantial update of previous molGPA models with better prediction performance, may be useful in clinical decision making and stratification of future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Accurate Diagnosis, Treatment, Research and Development, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jiayi Tong
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Weifeng Ma
- Department of Neurology, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Accurate Diagnosis, Treatment, Research and Development, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Chongliang Luo
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Huiqin Liu
- Department of Neurology, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Accurate Diagnosis, Treatment, Research and Development, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yushu Jiang
- Department of Neurology, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Accurate Diagnosis, Treatment, Research and Development, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lingzhi Qin
- Department of Neurology, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Accurate Diagnosis, Treatment, Research and Development, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaojuan Wang
- Department of Neurology, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Accurate Diagnosis, Treatment, Research and Development, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lipin Yuan
- Department of Neurology, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Accurate Diagnosis, Treatment, Research and Development, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jiewen Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Accurate Diagnosis, Treatment, Research and Development, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Fuhua Peng
- Department of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Neurology, Henan Joint International Research Laboratory of Accurate Diagnosis, Treatment, Research and Development, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ying Jiang
- Department of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng Y, Fu S, He T, Yan Q, Di W, Wang J. Predicting prognosis in resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using a clinical nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1199-1204. [PMID: 29784506 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Development demand of precise medicine in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) require to recognize patients at high risk treated by surgery alone. Thus, our aim was to construct a clinical nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to predict long-term survival in ESCC treated by surgery alone. METHODS Based on the patients with ESCC who treated by three-incisional esophagectomy and two-field lymphadenectomy alone, we identified and integrated significant prognostic factors for survival to build a nomogram. The nomogram was calibrated for overall survival (OS) and the predictive accuracy and discriminative ability was measured by concordance index (c-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Based on the nomogram, the RPA was performed for risk stratification. RESULTS A total of 747 patients were included for analysis. Five independent prognostic factors were identified and entered into the nomogram. The calibration curves for probability of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS showed optimal agreement between nomogram prediction and actual observation. The AIC value of the nomogram was lower than that of the 7th edition staging system, whereas the c-index of the nomogram was higher than that of the 7th edition staging system. The risk groups stratified by RPA allowed significant distinction between survival curves within respective TNM categories. CONCLUSION The RPA based on a clinical nomogram appears to be suitable for risk stratification in OS for resected ESCC. This practical system may help clinicians in decision making and design of clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhen Zheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Shenshen Fu
- Department of Ultrasonography, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Tiancheng He
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Qihang Yan
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Wenyu Di
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China
| | - Junye Wang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang H, Shen L, Geng J, Wu Y, Xiao H, Zhang F, Si H. Prognostic value of cancer antigen -125 for lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis: A random survival forest prognostic model. Sci Rep 2018; 8:5670. [PMID: 29618796 PMCID: PMC5884842 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23946-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Using random survival forest, this study was intended to evaluate the prognostic value of serum markers for lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis (BM), and tried to integrate them into a prognostic model. During 2010 to 2015, the patients were retrieved from two medical centers. Besides the Cox proportional hazards regression, the random survival forest (RSF) were also used to develop prognostic model from the group A (n = 142). In RSF of the group A, the factors, whose minimal depth were greater than the depth threshold or had a negative variable importance (VIMP), were firstly excluded. Subsequently, C-index and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to guide us finding models with higher prognostic ability and lower overfitting possibility. These RSF models, together with the Cox, modified-RPA and lung-GPA index were validated and compared, especially in the group B (CAMS, n = 53). Our data indicated that the KSE125 model (KPS, smoking, EGFR-20 (exon 18, 19 and 21) and Ca125) was the best in survival prediction, and performed well in internal and external validation. In conclusions, for lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis, a validated prognostic nomogram (KPS, smoking, EGFR-20 and Ca125) can more accurately predict 1-year and 2-year survival of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, 230022, China
| | - Liuhai Shen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, 230022, China
| | - Jianhua Geng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yitian Wu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Huan Xiao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, 230022, China
| | - Fan Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, 230022, China
| | - Hongwei Si
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, 230022, China.
| |
Collapse
|