Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--radiological assessment of fundus size and sleeve voiding

The effect of antral resection start point on post sleeve gastrectomy gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and weight loss outcomes

PURPOSE

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has gained worldwide popularity by surgeons due to acceptable results in weight loss and obesity-associated medical problems. Distance from the pylorus during antral resection in SG may be effective in decreasing the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate GERD symptoms and weight loss outcomes in two groups of SG patients with different start points of antral resection.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study on 220 patients who underwent SG between June 2019 and July 2021, aged 18 and above, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m², or BMI > 35 kg/m² with at least one obesity-associated medical problem. According to the start point of antral resection the patients were divided in two groups (group A: from 2 cm of pylorus and group B: from 4 cm of pylorus). Evaluation of GERD was performed using GerdQ questionnaire at 12-month follow up.

RESULTS

Mean age and BMI of all patients were 37.6 ± 10 year and 44.8 ± 5.7 kg/m² at the time of SG. Totally 153(69.5%) of the patients were female. De novo GERD after 12 months in the groups A and B was found in 18 (20%) and 19 (21%) patients. TWL% at 12-month follow ups, were 33.9% and 32.5% in group A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Antral resection's start point has no statistically significant effect on the excess and total weight loss indices, resolution of the obesity-related medical problems and De novo GERD between 2 and 4 cm start point for antral resection during SG.

Sleeve gastrectomy morphology and long-term weight-loss and gastroesophageal reflux disease outcomes

BACKGROUND

The relationship between sleeve gastrectomy (SG) morphology and long-term weight-loss and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

All patients (n = 268) undergoing SG performed by 3 surgeons at a single academic institution from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012 were included. Long-term weight-loss and GERD outcomes were available for 90 patients which were incorporated in analyses. SG morphology was determined from postoperative day 1 upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) available from 50 patients. Images were independently categorized using previously published methodology as Dumbbell (38%), Lower Pouch (22%), Tubular (26%), or Upper Pouch (14%) by Radiologist and Surgeon. Radiologist categorization was used when disagreement occurred (8%). Univariable analyses were conducted to explore potential associations between SG morphology, weight loss, and GERD outcomes.

RESULTS

Follow-up was 8.2 ± 0.9 years. Population characteristics included age of 45.1 ± 10.8 years, female sex in 83.3%, and hiatal hernia repair (HHR) performed at index SG in 17.8%. Surgeons did not preferentially achieve a specific SG morphology. Changes from preoperative obesity and associated diseases comprised body mass index (BMI) (49.5 ± 7.6 vs. 39.2 ± 9.4 kg/m²; p < 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (30.0 vs. 12.2%; p = 0.0006), hypertension (70.0 vs. 54.4%; p = 0.0028), hyperlipidemia (42.2 vs. 24.2%;p = 0.0017), obstructive sleep apnea (41.1 vs. 15.6%; p < 0.0001), osteoarthritis (48.9 vs. 13.3%; p < 0.0001), back pain (46.5 vs. 28.9%; p = 0.0035), and medications (4.8 ± 3.3 vs. 3.7 ± 3.5; p < 0.0001). Dumbbell SG morphology was associated with lesser reduction in BMI at follow-up (--6.8 ± 7.2 vs. -12.4 ± 8.3 kg/m²; p = 0.0196) while greater BMI change was appreciated with Lower Pouch SG shape (-16.9 ± 9.9 vs. -8.4 ± 6.8 kg/m²; p = 0.0017). GERD was more prevalent at follow-up than baseline (67.8 vs. 47.8%; p < 0.0001). GERD-specific outcomes included de novo (51.1%), persistent (27.9%), worsened (58.1%), and resolved (14.0%) disease. Ten patients underwent reoperation for refractory GERD with SG morphology corresponding to Dumbbell (n = 5) and Upper Pouch (n = 1) for those with available UGIS. Univariable analyses showed that patients with GERD experienced a larger reduction in BMI compared with patients without GERD (-11.8 ± 7.7 vs. -7.0 ± 5.1 kg/m²; p = 0.0007). Patient age, surgeon, morphology category, and whether a HHR was done at index SG were not associated with the presence of any, de novo, or worsened GERD. Female sex was associated with worsened GERD (96.0 vs. 4.0%; p = 0.0455). Type of calibration device, distance from staple line to pylorus, and whether staple line reinforcement was used were not associated with SG morphology classification.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study assessing the impact of SG morphology on long-term weight loss and GERD. Our data suggest an association between SG morphology and long-term weight loss but not with GERD outcomes. Current technical standards may be limited in reproducing the same SG morphology. This information may help guide the technical optimization and standardization of SG. Surgeons did not favor a specific SG morphology (1). Our results signal to a relationship between radiographic assessment of SG morphology and long-term weight-loss outcomes with Dumbbell classification correlated with lesser reduction in BMI (2a) and Lower Pouch morphology associated with superior weight loss (2b). SG, sleeve gastrectomy; BMI, body mass index.

Is there a role for upper gastrointestinal contrast study to predict the outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy? Lessons learnt from a prospective study

Context:

The importance of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast study following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is equivocal. It can, however, yield anatomical and functional details, the significance of which mostly remains unknown.

Settings and Design:

This prospective, single-center study included SG patients between January 2018 and January 2019.

Materials and Methods:

UGI contrast study was done on post-operative day 1. The findings of the study namely gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) holdup time, presence of fundus, gastroduodenal emptying (GDE) time, and sleeve shape were compared with weight loss, improvement of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up.

Results:

There were 138 patients with 100% follow-up. Radiological sleeve patterns observed were: tubular (62.3%), superior (16.0%), and inferior (21.7%) pouches. GEJ holdup time had no effect on percentage total weight loss (%TWL) (P = 0.09) or HbA1c improvement (P = 0.077). The absence of fundus led to greater %TWL at 6 months (P = 0.048). GDE time <15 s led to higher %TWL (P = 0.028) and lower HbA1c (P = 0.010) at 12 months. Antrum size <2 cm was associated with higher %TWL (P = 0.022) and lower HbA1c level (P = 0.047) at 12 months. Vomiting and regurgitation were common with tubular sleeves.

Conclusion:

UGI contrast study can predict weight loss, HbA1c improvement, and GERD symptoms. The absence of fundus, small antrum, and rapid GDE are associated with better weight loss. HbA1c improvement is better with small antrum and rapid GDE. Tubular sleeve predisposes to vomiting and regurgitation.

Radiographic Measurement of Gastric Remnant Volume After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Assessment of Reproducibility and Correlation with Weight Loss

BACKGROUND

As a restrictive procedure, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) relies primarily on the reduction of gastric volume. It has been suggested that an immediate postoperative gastric remnant volume (GRV) may influence long-term results of LSG; however, there are no consensus in this matter. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of different radiographic methods of GRV calculation and evaluate their correlation with the weight loss (WL) after surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 174 patients who underwent LSG in the period from 2014 to 2017. Using UGI, GRV was measured with 3 different mathematical methods by 2 radiologists. Intraobserver and interobserver calculations were made. Correlation between GRV and WL were estimated with calculations percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) after 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

During analysis of intraobserver similarities, the results of ICC calculation showed that reproducibility was good to excellent for all GRV calculation methods. The intraobserver reproducibility for Reader I was highest for cylinder and truncated cone formula and for Reader II for ellipsoid formula. The interobserver reproducibility was highest for ellipsoid formula. Regarding correlation between GRV and WL, significant negative correlation has been shown on the 12th month after LSG in %TWL and %EWL for every method of GRV calculation, most important for ellipsoid formula (%TWL - r(X,Y) = -0.335, p < 0.001 and %EWL - r(X,Y) = -0.373, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Radiographic methods of GRV calculation are characterized by good reproducibility and correlate with the postoperative WL.

Imaging after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy - literature review with practical recommendations

In the XXI century obesity has become one of the most demanding epidemiological threats worldwide. At the same time, bariatric surgery has established itself as an effective treatment for morbidly obese patients, with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) emerging as the most popular bariatric procedure. This paper reviews the role of imaging studies of patients after LSG. Computed tomography is widely considered as the method of choice in detection of complications in early postoperative period. The dynamic character of upper gastrointestinal examination allows for the assessment of passage through the gastric remnant. The paper also discusses evaluation of the shape and volume of the gastric remnant assessed by imaging studies.

Acceleration of Gastric Emptying and Improvement of GERD Outcome After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Non-diabetic Obese Patients

PURPOSE

Obesity has become a pandemic nowadays. Bariatric surgery is increasingly performed to manage obesity. Currently, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a widely accepted procedure given its feasibility and efficacy. Previous studies revealed conflicting results regarding the change of gastric emptying following sleeve gastrectomy. The primary aim of the present study is to assess gastric motor function by gastric emptying scintigraphy in a cohort of non-diabetic patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for treatment of severe obesity.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 100 obese, non-diabetic patients attending the surgery clinic at Cairo University Hospitals and Al Azhar University Hospitals. LSG was performed following a standardized protocol, with no complications observed. All patients had gastric emptying scintigraphy done through a standard semisolid meal (250 kcal), marked with 0.5 mCiTc 99, pre-operatively and 3 months after LSG.

RESULTS

The mean age was 38.71 years (9.2) and males comprised 57% of the cohort. The body mass index, low-density lipoproteins, and glycated hemoglobin declined significantly at 3-month postsurgery. The scintigraphy study revealed a significantly reduced percent retention at equivalent time points 3 months after LSG. In addition, the percent of patients suffering from GERD decreased significantly after LSG.

CONCLUSION

Gastric emptying becomes faster after LSG in morbidly obese non-diabetic patients. GERD symptoms improve after surgery.

Sleeve Volume and Preoperative Gastric Volume Assessment Using Three-dimensional MDCT Gastrography and Their Correlation to Short-term Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy Weight Loss

PURPOSE

Several factors including preoperative stomach capacity and sleeve volume impact weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We aimed at measuring these volumes using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) gastrography and correlating them with postoperative weight losses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Morbidly obese patients prepared for LSG during 2018 were included in the study. MDCT gastrography was performed 1 week before, 6 and 12 months after LSG. Preoperative gastric volume and postoperative sleeve volumes were measured. Correlation with preoperative BMI and postoperative %TWL was performed. The change in sleeve volume at 6 and 12 months was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients (62 F) were included. Mean preoperative BMI was47 ± 7 kg/m². Follow-up was achieved in 89 patients (91%) and 82 patients (83%) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Mean %TWL was 24 ± 3 and 32.8 ± 3 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.05). Preoperative gastric volume ranged from 800 to 1800 ml (mean ± SD, 1310 ± 307) and dropped significantly to range from 140 to 170 ml (158 ± 9) and from 165 to 210 ml (181 ± 12) at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Pouch was not significantly dilated at 12 vs. 6 months postoperatively. Preoperative gastric volume was significantly correlated with preoperative BMI (p = 0.006*) but not with postoperative weight losses. Correlation between postoperative pouch volumes and weight losses at 6 and 12 months postoperatively showed no significance.

CONCLUSION

Sleeve pouch is significantly smaller than preoperative stomach, but not significantly correlated to weight loss. Restriction is an important, but not the only factor controlling weight loss after LSG.

Is the Resected Gastric Volume Effective in the Complication of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy?

BACKGROUND

To determine the relationship between the resected gastric volume (RGV) and the results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHODS

The study included 333 patients with LSG. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to RGV: 600 to 999 cm as Group 1, 1000 to 1499 cm as Group 2, 1500 to 1999 cm as Group 3, and ≥2000 cm consists the Group 4. Prospectively collected data at first month, sixth month, and at first year were retrospectively reviewed. The percentage of the reduction in body mass index and the excess weight loss and remission of comorbid diseases were recorded.

RESULTS

Preoperative demographic data were similar within groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of the changes in excess weight loss. The major complication rates were highest in Group 4 and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that different RGV do not affect the results of LSG, furthermore in patients with RGV ≥2000 cm, surgeons should be careful for major complications.

A Higher Preoperative Glycemic Profile Is Associated with Rapid Gastric Emptying After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obese Subjects

BACKGROUND

Recent reports have shown that sleeve gastrectomy (SG) accelerates gastric emptying (GE), but the etiology remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting GE before and after SG.

METHODS

We enrolled 35 normal weight healthy subjects and 23 obese patients receiving SG. The normal individuals and obese patients before and 3 months after SG received oatmeal-based scintigraphy to measure GE. Gastrointestinal symptoms and circulating levels of peptide YY (PYY) were also measured.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the GE parameters, including simple half-time at 3 h and percentage of gastric retention at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 h between healthy controls and pre-SG obese subjects. SG led to accelerated GE, more gastrointestinal symptoms, and increased fasting PYY levels postoperatively. Based on our previously established normal GE values, 18 (78.3%) obese patients with rapid postoperative GE had higher levels of preoperative fasting glucose and glycated hemoglobin, and homeostasis model assessment of the insulin resistance index than those with normal postoperative GE. Twelve (52.2%) obese patients had preoperative diabetes mellitus (DM), and only four (17.4%) remained diabetic after SG. The post-SG gastric retention at 0.5 and 1 h was lower in patients with preoperative DM than in those without preoperative DM. Neither severity of gastrointestinal symptoms nor fasting PYY levels were associated with postoperative GE alterations.

CONCLUSION

Most of the obese patients had accelerated GE after SG. A higher preoperative glycemic profile was associated with rapid post-SG GE.

Alterations of Gastric Emptying Features Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Chinese Patients with Obesity: a Self-Controlled Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become an increasingly popular metabolic surgical procedure. Alteration in motor gastric function is a fundamental feature following LSG but still remains controversial.

PURPOSE

To determine the gastric emptying time 3 month after LSG, correlations between gastric emptying time and body weight, weight loss, and glycemia levels, alongside determining predictive factors of weight loss at the 3-month follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients were recruited in this study. Gastric emptying time was measured using a standard solid-phase gastric emptying scan at both baseline and 3 months after LSG. Paired sample t tests and a general linear model with repeated measures were applied to investigate the alterations in major parameters after surgery. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate the factors predicting weight loss at the 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline levels, gastric emptying time, body weight, and HbA_1c levels decreased significantly at 3 months after LSG (P < 0.001). Significant positive correlations were detected between HbA_1c levels and gastric emptying time at baseline (P = 0.03). Significant positive correlations were detected between HbA_1c levels at baseline and change in gastric emptying time (P = 0.03). Univariate logistic regression revealed a lower baseline BMI level to be independently associated with %EWL (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of gastric emptying increased following LSG. Patients with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes at baseline had longer gastric emptying times prior to treatment and significantly shortened emptying times following surgery.

Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Gastrointestinal Motility

Objective

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was considered mainly as a restrictive procedure due to anatomic alterations in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Additionally, due to neurohormonal alterations, LSG modifies the gastrointestinal motility, which controls appetite and feeling of satiety.

Aim

The aim of the study was to review the impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on gastrointestinal motility.

Material and Methods

A search of the medical literature was undertaken in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library. Esophageal, gastric, bowel motility were assessed separately.

Results

Nine studies assessed esophageal motility. The data remain debatable attributing to the heterogeneity of follow-up timing, surgical technique, bougie size, and distance from pylorus. The stomach motility was assessed in eighteen studies. Functionally, the sleeve was divided into a passive sleeve and an accelerated antrum. All scintigraphic studies revealed accelerated gastric emptying after LSG except of one. Patients demonstrated a rapid gastroduodenal transit time. The resection of the gastric pacemaker had as a consequence aberrant distal ectopic pacemaking or bioelectrical quiescence after LSG. The bowel motility was the least studied. Small bowel transit time was reduced; opposite to that the initiation of cecal filling and the ileocecal valve transit was delayed.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has impacts on gastrointestinal motility. The data remain debatable for esophageal motility. Stomach and small bowel motility were accelerated, while the initiation of cecal filling and the ileocecal valve transit was delayed. Further pathophysiological studies are needed to evaluate the correlation of motility data with clinical symptoms.

Antral resection versus antral preservation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is an established operation for severe obesity, there is controversy regarding the extent to which the antrum is excised. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the effect on perioperative complications and medium-term outcomes of antral resecting versus antral preserving sleeve gastrectomy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1946 to April 2017. Eligible studies compared antral resection (staple line commencing 2-3 cm from pylorus) with antral preservation (>5 cm from pylorus) in patients undergoing primary sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Meta-analyses were performed with a random-effects model, and risk of bias within and across studies was assessed using validated scoring systems. Eight studies (619 participants) were included: 6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies. Overall follow-up was 94% for the specified outcomes of each study. Mean percentage excess weight loss was 62% at 12 months (7 studies; 574 patients) and 67% at 24 months (4 studies; 412 patients). Antral resection was associated with significant improvement in percentage excess weight loss at 24-month follow-up (mean 70% versus 61%; standardized mean difference .95; confidence interval .35-1.58, P<.005), an effect that remained significant when cohort studies were excluded. There was no difference in incidence of perioperative bleeding, leak, or de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease. According to the available evidence, antral resection is associated with better medium-term weight loss compared with antral preservation, without increased risk of surgical complications. Further randomized clinical trials are indicated to confirm this finding.

The role of proximal versus distal stomach resection in the weight loss seen after vertical sleeve gastrectomy

The mechanisms involved in the weight loss seen after vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) are not clear. The rat stomach has two morphologically and functionally distinct proximal and distal parts. The rat model for VSG involves complete removal of the proximal part and 80% removal of the distal part along the greater curvature. The purpose of this study was to understand the potential independent contributions of removal of these distinct gastric sections to VSG outcomes. We prepared four surgical groups of male Long-Evans rats: VSG, sham surgery (control), selective proximal section removal (PR), and selective distal section removal (DR). Gastric emptying rate (GER) was highest after VSG compared with all other groups. However, PR, in turn, had significantly greater GER compared with both DR and sham groups. The surgery-induced weight loss followed the same pattern with VSG causing the greatest weight loss and PR having greater weight loss compared with DR and sham groups. The results were robust for rats fed regular chow or a high-fat diet. Body mass analysis revealed that the weight loss was due to the loss of fat mass, and there was no change in lean mass after the surgeries. In conclusion, removal of the proximal stomach contributes to most, but not all, of the physiological impact of VSG.

Impact of sleeve gastrectomy volumes on weight loss results: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Causes of weight loss failure after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are still controversial. The impact of the size of the sleeve continues to be debated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to determine the impact of sleeve volumes assessed at 3 months using gastric computed tomography (CT) on weight loss at 18 months.

SETTING

University Hospital, France.

METHODS

Sixty-seven obese patients eligible for SG were prospectively evaluated. Sleeve volumes were assessed postsurgery using 3-dimensional gastric CT with gas at 3 months and weight loss outcomes recorded up to 18 months. The population was divided into 2 groups: the first tertile (n = 22) with the smallest gastric volume was defined as the "small sleeve" group (SSG) and the rest of the population (n = 45) was defined as the "without small sleeve" group (WSSG).

RESULTS

No patients were lost to follow-up. In the SSG, overall gastric volume was 133±7 mL versus 264±11 mL for the WSSG (P<.0001). Percentage excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) during the first postoperative 18 months was significantly greater in the SSG compared with the WSSG (P = .04). Although the volume of the gastric tube was not correlated with weight loss (r =-.04, P = .78), there was a negative linear correlation between the volume of the antrum and the %EBMIL at 18 months (r =-.39, P = .005). A narrow gastric tube was also associated with a high digestive intolerance and reflux.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that performing the sleeve with a not-too-small bougie size and a radical antrectomy could improve weight loss and digestive tolerance.

[Outcomes, controversies and gastric volume after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of obesity]

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a surgical procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity. However, there are still controversies regarding its efficiency in terms of weight reduction and incidence of complications. In this prospective study, the experience is presented of a referral centre for the treatment of morbid obesity with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study on 73 patients subjected to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy from February 2009 to September 2013. Patients were followed-up for a period of 12 months, evaluating the development of complications, reduction of gastric volume, and the weight loss associated with the surgery, as well as their impact on the improvement of comorbidities present at beginning of the study.

RESULTS

There was a statistically a significantly reduction between the preoperative body mass index (BMI) and the BMI at 12 months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (p < 0.001), despite there being an increase in the gastric volume during follow-up, measured at one month and 12 months after surgery (p < 0.001). Five patients (6.85%) had complications, with none of them serious and with no deaths in the whole series.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of morbid obesity. Its use is associated with a significant reduction in the presence of comorbidities associated with obesity. Multicentre studies with a longer period of monitoring are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of this surgical technique.

Relationship between gastric pouch and weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is considered safe and effective even as conversion procedure after primary bariatric operations. The correlation between gastric pouch volumes and patients weight loss remains unclear.

METHODS

To assess a correlation between the gastric remnant size and the weight loss, we reviewed 49 consecutive barium swallow UGS performed at our institute from August 2012 through May 2014 in LSG patients with symptoms and/or unsatisfactory weight loss. The anteroposterior (AP), laterolateral (LL) and vertical (CC) diameters of the gastric pouch were measured to calculate the volume by the formula of the ellipsoid (AP × LL × CC × 0.5). Patients were divided in two groups: group 1 without gastric pouch (n = 36) and group 2 with gastric pouch (n = 13). Correlation between pouch volume and weight loss data was calculated with t Student's and Fisher tests to compare the percent excess body mass index (BMI) and percent excess body mass loss (EBL) between two groups, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean percent EBL was 26.54 ± 11.02 and 27.12 ± 12.35 kg/m(2) in groups with and without pouch, respectively. The mean volume of the pouch after LSG was 17.13 ± 21.56 mm(3). Pouch volume, when present, was not significantly correlated to weight loss (P = 0.88 95% CI, CL 19.88-33.20 group 2; CL 22.94-31.30 group 1).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistical correlation was found between the volume of the gastric pouch and weight loss (percent EBL) after LSG in symptomatic or with unsatisfactory weight loss patients.

[Dumping syndrome: Diagnostics and therapeutic options]

BACKGROUND

Dumping syndrome is a common complication after surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract with symptoms ranging from mild gastrointestinal discomfort and moderate vasomotor disturbances, to severe hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Due to the increasing number of bariatric procedures being performed worldwide, bariatric surgery has become the most common cause for this disease entity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to highlight the evidence for the physiological mechanisms contributing to dumping syndrome after the two most common bariatric surgery procedures, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, to discuss technical aspects of the procedures underlying the development of the syndrome, patient-related predictive factors and other differential diagnoses, together with diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms.

Residual gastric volume estimated with a new radiological volumetric model: relationship with weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The volume of the gastric reservoir appears crucial to explain the success of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the treatment of morbid obesity. The aims of this study were to describe a new, easy model to estimate gastric reservoir volume after LSG; to evaluate the volumetric changes 1 year after surgery; and to analyze their relationship with weight loss.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of all patients undergoing LSG in the Department of Surgery at our institution. The gastric reservoir was evaluated radiologically considering the image as a complex geometrical shape with two components: a cylinder (gastric body) and a truncated cone (antrum). Radiologic assessment using this new model was performed at 1 and 12 months after surgery. Moreover, body mass index and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after LSG.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (34 F/11 M) with a mean age of 46.9 years were included. A significant increase in total gastric reservoir volume (124.8 ± 58.7 and 188.6 ± 76.4 mL at 1 and 12 months, respectively; p = 0.001) was observed. No statistically significant differences were observed comparing volume of the two components at the two time points. The %EWL at 18 months was inversely correlated with reservoir volume changes at 12 months after LSG (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe an easy volumetric model to estimate the size of the gastric reservoir after LSG. Moreover, a direct relationship between an increase in gastric reservoir volume and a lower weight loss after surgery was documented.

Radical resection of the pyloric antrum and its effect on gastric emptying after sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The surgical technique of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has not been fully standardized yet and there is the unresolved question of what is the optimum size of retained pyloric antrum. The aim of our research was to prove that even after a radical resection of the pyloric antrum the physiological stomach evacuation function can still be preserved.

METHODS

Our study was based on 12 patients, who were randomly divided into two groups. Patients undergoing radical antrum resection (RA group) underwent gastric emptying scintigraphy to determine the evacuation half-time (T1/2) and food retention in the 90th minute of the test (%GE) both before the operation and 3 months afterward. Patients in whom the antrum was preserved (PA group) served as a control group for comparison of postoperative weight loss (in kilogram), decrease in body mass index (BMI), and decline in excess weight (%EWL). The resulting changes were statistically processed.

RESULTS

In the RA group, the average time T1/2 declined from 57.5 to 32.25 min (p = 0.016) and average retention %GE dropped from 20.5 to 9.5% (p = 0.073). Differences in the average values of weight, BMI, or %EWL between both groups were of no statistical significance (p > 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

In the RA group, an increase in gastric emptying postoperatively was noted. Complications such as failure of stomach evacuation were not observed in the RA group. Our results suggest that even more radical resection of the pyloric antrum performed by LSG is possible without concerns of postoperative disorder of the stomach evacuation function.

Mechanisms underlying weight loss after bariatric surgery

The clinical efficacy of bariatric surgery has encouraged the scientific investigation of the gut as a major endocrine organ. Manipulation of gastrointestinal anatomy through surgery has been shown to profoundly affect the physiological and metabolic processes that control body weight and glycaemia. The most popular bariatric surgical procedures are gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding and vertical sleeve gastrectomy. Even though these procedures were designed with the aim of causing restriction of food intake and nutrient malabsorption, evidence suggests that their contributions to weight loss are minimal. Instead, these interventions reduce body weight by decreasing hunger, increasing satiation during a meal, changing food preferences and energy expenditure. In this Review, we have explored these mechanisms as well as their mediators. The hope is that that their in-depth investigation will enable the optimization and individualization of surgical techniques, the development of equally effective but safer nonsurgical weight-loss interventions, and even the understanding of the pathophysiology of obesity itself.

Excessive weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as a primary bariatric intervention is still under debate. This article aims to systematically analyze excessive weight loss (EWL) in patients after SG.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on SG from the period January 2003 to December 2010 was performed. Data described from systematic reviews dealing with gastric bypass procedures was used as comparator.

RESULTS

The final study included 123 papers describing 12,129 patients. Most of the papers describe EWL at 12 months (43.9% of all papers). For SG, the maximum EWL occurred 24 and 36 months postoperatively with a mean EWL of 64.3% (minimum 46.1%, maximum 75.0%) and 66.0% (minimum 60.0%, maximum 77.5%), respectively. At 12 months, the mean EWL in patients receiving SG was significantly lower when compared to patients who underwent gastric bypass (SG 56.1%, gastric bypass 68.3%; p < 0.01, two-sided Wilcoxon test). Although patients with gastric bypass still had higher EWL rates at 24 months compared to patients after SG, these differences were not significant (SG 61.3%, gastric bypass 69.6%; p = 0.09, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Reoperations after SG are necessary in 6.8% (range 0.7-25%) of cases with patients receiving SG as a stand alone procedure and in 9.6-28.5% of cases with patients undergoing SG as a planned first stage procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

SG is an effective bariatric procedure with a lasting effect on EWL. Compared with gastric bypasses, there is no difference in EWL at the time point of 24 months.

Sleeve gastrectomy and crural repair in obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatal hernia

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with or without hiatal hernia (HH) is now recognized as an obesity-related co-morbidity. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has been proved to be the most effective bariatric procedure for the treatment of morbidly obese patients with GERD and/or HH. In contrast, the indication for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in these patients is still debated. Our objective was to report our experience with 97 patients who underwent SG and HH repair (HHR). The setting was a university hospital in Italy.

METHODS

From July 2009 to December 2011, 378 patients underwent a preoperative workup for SG. In 97 patients, SG was performed with HHR. The clinical outcome was evaluated considering GERD symptom resolution or improvement, interruption of antireflux medications, and radiographic evidence of HH recurrence.

RESULTS

Before surgery, symptomatic GERD was present in 60 patients (15.8%), and HH was diagnosed in 42 patients (11.1%). In 55 patients (14.5%), HH was diagnosed intraoperatively. The mean follow-up was 18 months. GERD remission occurred in 44 patients (73.3%). In the remaining 16 patients, antireflux medications were diminished, with complete control of symptoms in 5 patients. No HH recurrences developed. "De novo" GERD symptoms developed in 22.9% of the patients undergoing SG alone compared with 0% of patients undergoing SG plus HHR.

CONCLUSION

SG with HHR is feasible and safe, providing good management of GERD in obese patients with reflux symptoms. Small hiatal defects could be underdiagnosed at preoperative endoscopy and/or upper gastrointestinal contrast study. Thus, a careful examination of the crura is always recommended intraoperatively.

Tests of correlation between immediate postoperative gastroduodenal transit times and weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown accelerated gastric emptying after sleeve gastrectomy. This study aimed to determine whether a correlation exists between immediate postoperative gastroduodenal transit time and weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Specifically, correlation tests were conducted to determine whether more rapid transit after LSG correlated with increased weight loss.

METHODS

Data were collected from an institutional review board-approved electronic registry. All LSGs were performed over a 40-Fr bougie, starting 5 to 7 cm proximal to the pylorus. Gastroduodenal transit time (antrum to duodenum) was calculated from a postoperative day 1 esophagram. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis included 62 consecutive LSG patients. The mean gastroduodenal transit time was 12.3 ± 19.8 s. Almost all the patients (99%) had a transit time less than 60 s. The mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 23.8 ± 9.8% at 3 months, 37.9 ± 11.8% at 6 months, and 52.2 ± 10.8% at 12 months. No correlation was found between gastroduodenal transit time and %EWL at 3, 6, or 12 months.

CONCLUSION

No correlation was found between gastroduodenal transit time and weight loss after LSG.

Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the management of patients with BMI < 50 kg/m2

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is currently the gold standard bariatric procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a relatively innovative procedure which has been increasingly applied lately as a sole bariatric procedure. A randomized trial was conducted in a Greek population to evaluate perioperative safety and 3-years results.

METHODS

Sixty patients with body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 Kg/m(2) were randomized to LRYGB or LSG. Patients were monitored for 3 years postoperatively and throughout the study period weight loss, in terms of percent excess weight loss (%EWL), early and late complications, improvement of obesity related comorbidities and nutritional deficiencies were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There was no death in either group and there was no significant difference in early (10% after LRYGB and 13% after LSG, P > 0.05) and late morbidity (10% in each group). Weight loss was significantly better after LSG in the first years of the study and at 3 years %EWL reached 62% after LRYGB and 68% after LSG (p = 0.13). There was no significant difference in the overall improvement of comorbidities. Nutritional deficiencies occurred at the same rate in the two groups except to vitamin B(12) deficiency which was more common after LRYGB (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LSG and LRYGB are equally safe and effective in the amelioration of comorbidities, while LSG is associated with fewer postoperative metabolic deficiencies, without the need of supplementation. Furthermore, LSG is a promising bariatric procedure, equally effective to LRYGB at 3 years follow up on weight reduction.